Cardiology最新文献

Introduction: Despite contemporary practice guidelines, a substantial number of post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients fail to achieve guideline-recommended LDL-C thresholds. Our study aimed to investigate this guideline recommendations-to-practice care gap. Specifically, we aimed to identify opportunities where additional lipid-lowering therapies are indicated and explore reasons for the non-prescription of guideline-recommended therapies.

Methods: ACS patients with LDL-C ≥1.81 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) despite maximally tolerated statin ± ezetimibe therapy (including those intolerant of ≥2 statins) were enrolled 1-12 months post-event from 27 Canadian and US sites from September 2018 to October 2020 and followed up for three visits during the 12 months post-event. We determined the proportion of patients who did not achieve Canadian/US guideline-recommended LDL-C thresholds, the number of patients who would have been eligible for additional lipid-lowering therapies, and reasons behind lack of escalation in lipid-lowering therapies when indicated. Individual patient and aggregate practice feedback, including guideline-recommended intensification suggestions, were provided to each physician.

Results: Of the 248 patients enrolled in the pilot study (median age 64 [57, 73] years, 31.5% female and STEMI 27.4%), 75.4% were on high-intensity statins on the first visit. A total of 18.5% of those who attended all 3 visits had an LDL-C measured only at the first visit which was above the threshold. After 1 year of follow-up, 51.9% of patients achieved LDL-C thresholds at either visit 2 or 3. In the context of feedback reminding physicians about guideline-directed LDL-C-modifying therapy in their individual participating patients, we observed an increase in the use of ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitor therapy at 3-12 months. This was associated with a significant lowering of the mean LDL-C (from 2.93 mmol/L [baseline] to 2.09 mmol/L [3-6 months] to 1.87 mmol/L [6-12 months]) and a significantly greater proportion of patients (from 0% [baseline] to 38.6% [3-6 months] to 53.4% [6-12 months]) achieving guideline-recommended LDL-C thresholds. The most prevalent reasons behind the non-intensification of LDL-C-lowering therapy with ezetimibe and/or PCSK9i were LDL-C levels being close to target, the pre-existing use of other lipid-lowering therapies, patient refusal, and cost.

Conclusion: Although most patients post-ACS were on high-intensity statin therapy, almost 50% failed to achieve guideline-recommended LDL-C thresholds by 1-year follow-up. Furthermore, additional lipid-lowering therapies in this high-risk group were underprescribed, and this might be linked to several factors including potential gaps in physician knowledge, treatment inertia, patient refusal, and cost.

Introduction: Mortality from acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains substantial. The current study is aimed at developing a novel simple risk score for AMI.

Methods: The Coronary Artery Tree description and Lesion EvaluaTion (CatLet) extended validation trial (ChiCTR2000033730) and the CatLet validation trial (ChiCTR-POC-17013536), both being registered with chictr.org, served as the derivation and validation datasets, respectively. Both datasets included 1,018 and 308 patients, respectively. They all suffered from AMI and underwent percutaneous intervention (PCI). The endpoint was 4-year all-cause death. Lasso regression analysis was used for covariate selection and coefficient estimation.

Results: Of 26 candidate predictor variables, the four strongest predictors for 4-year mortality were included in this novel risk score with an acronym of BACEF (serum alBumin, Age, serum Creatinine, and LVEF). This score was well calibrated and yielded an AUC (95% CI) statistics of 0.84 (0.80-0.87) in internal validation, 0.89 (0.83-0.95) in internal-external (temporal) validation, and 0.83 (0.77-0.89) in external validation. Notably, it outperformed the ACEF, ACEF II, GRACE scores with respect to 4-year mortality prediction.

Conclusion: A simple risk score for 4-year mortality risk stratification was developed, extensively validated, and calibrated in patients with AMI. This novel BACEF score may be a useful risk stratification tool for patients with AMI.

Introduction: Our team once proposed a correction of transitional zone index (CTZI) based on the transitional zone index (TZI) in view of achieving a more precise prediction of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmia (OTVA). The predictive accuracy of these two electrocardiogram (ECG) algorithms has not been validated and compared. The purpose of this study was to compare the predictive accuracy of TZI and CTZI in a much larger population with idiopathic OTVA.

Methods: The predictive accuracy of TZI and CTZI was compared in 695 individuals with idiopathic premature ventricular complex or ventricular tachycardia which exhibited a left bundle branch block pattern and inferior axis QRS morphology. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, decision curve analysis, and calibration curve were used to compare the predictive accuracy of TZI and CTZI.

Results: TZI and CTZI manifested the similar area under the curve. While a TZI of <0 predicted a left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) origin with a high specificity of 88.2% but a low sensitivity of 67.1%, a CTZI of <0 yielded a high sensitivity of 84.3% but a low specificity of 59.5% in the overall analysis. Similar results were yielded in the sub-analysis of participants with a precordial transition occurring at lead V3. In the sub-analysis of participants with a TZI = 0, CTZI demonstrated a bit higher but not satisfactory predictive accuracy than TZI.

Conclusion: Based on the scientific spirit of self-criticism and seeking truth from facts, our team disproves the correction of TZI proposed previously.

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia associated with aging. Many known risk factors are associated with AF, but many senior individuals do not develop AF despite having multiple risk factors. This finding suggests that other factors may be involved in AF onset. This study aimed to identify upregulated genes in the peripheral blood and left atrium of patients with AF. These genes may serve as potential biomarkers to predict AF onset risk and its complications.

Methods: Gene expression data were analyzed from blood (n = 3) and left atrial samples (n = 15) of patients with AF and sinus rhythm. We evaluated the significant genes identified using p value analysis of weighted average difference to confirm their rankings. We created figures for the genes using GeneMANIA and performed a functional analysis using Cytoscape3.10.1. Hub and bottleneck genes were identified based on degree and betweenness centrality. We used reference expression (RefEx) to confirm the organs in which the extracted genes were expressed. Heatmaps and Gene ontology term evaluation were performed to further elucidate the biological functions of the genes.

Results: We identified 12 upregulated genes (CAST, ASAH1, MAFB, VCAN, DDIT4, FTL, HEXB, PROS1, BNIP3L, PABPC1, YBX3, and S100A6) in both the blood and left atrium of patients with AF. We analyzed the gene functions using GeneMANIA and Cytoscape. The identified genes were involved in a variety of pathways, including lysosomal function and lipid and sphingolipid catabolism. Next, we investigated whether the 12 identified genes identified were systemically expressed or had high organ specificity. Finally, RefEx was used to analyze the gene expression levels in various tissues. Four genes, FTL, ASAH1, S100A6, and PABPC1, were highly expressed in the normal heart tissue. Finally, we evaluated the expression levels of the 12 genes in the blood of patients with AF using a heatmap. Our findings suggest that the 12 genes identified in this study, especially the lysosome-related genes (FTL and ASAH1), may be involved in AF pathogenesis.

Conclusion: Lysosome-related genes may be important to understand the AF pathophysiology and to develop AF-related future studies.

Introduction: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a main contributor of sudden cardiac death worldwide. The discovery of new biomarkers that can improve AMI risk prediction meets a major clinical need for the identification of high-risk patients and the tailoring of medical treatment. Previously, we reported that autophagy a highly conserved catabolic mechanism for intracellular degradation of cellular components is involved in atherosclerotic plaque phenotype and cardiac pathological remodeling. The crucial role of autophagy in the normal and diseased heart has been well described, and its activation functions as a pro-survival process in response to myocardial ischemia. However, autophagy is dysregulated in ischemia/reperfusion injury, thus promoting necrotic or apoptotic cardiac cell death. Very few studies have focused on the plasma levels of autophagy markers in cardiovascular disease patients, even though they could be companion biomarkers of AMI injury. The aims of the present study were to evaluate (1) whether variations in plasma levels of two key autophagy regulators autophagy-related gene 5 (ATG5) and Beclin 1 (the mammalian yeast ortholog Atg6/Vps30) are associated with AMI and (2) their potential for predicting AMI risk.

Methods: The case-control study population included AMI patients (n = 100) and control subjects (n = 99) at high cardiovascular risk but without known coronary disease. Plasma levels of ATG5 and Beclin 1 were measured in the whole population study by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Results: Multivariate analyses adjusted on common cardiovascular factors and medical treatments, and receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrated that ATG5 and Beclin 1 levels were inversely associated with AMI and provided original biomarkers for AMI risk prediction.

Conclusion: Plasma levels of autophagy regulators ATG5 and Beclin 1 represent relevant candidate biomarkers associated with AMI.