Bladder cancer encapsulates a wide spectrum of disease severities, with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) representing an entirely different entity from muscle-invasive disease. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is one of the most successful intravesical treatment methods for patients diagnosed. However, a considerable proportion of patients fail to respond to BCG treatment. Given the propensity for recurrence in patients with high-risk bladder cancer, these patients present with surgical dilemmas. There is currently no gold standard for salvage treatment post-BCG failure or unified definition as to what that means. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of action and pathophysiology of BCG, potential theories behind BCG failure, and the scope of novel treatments for this surgical conundrum.
Chemotherapy remains the standard-of-care for many patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but acquired resistance presents challenges. The aim of this open-label, multicenter phase 2 clinical trial was to determine the efficacy and safety of utidelone, a novel genetically engineered epothilone analog and microtubule-stabilizing agent, as a third- or later-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC.
Patients who had failed standard second-line treatment (including platinum-containing chemotherapy or targeted therapy) received utidelone (40 mg/m2 via intravenous injection daily, day 1–5) every 21 days. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were the duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.
From March 12, 2019 to January 18, 2021, 26 pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC (100% of patients had received prior platinum and 65.4% patients had received prior taxane treatment) were enrolled (80.8% of patients had adenocarcinoma). At baseline, nine (34.6%) patients had received second-line treatment, 10 (38.5%) patients had received third-line treatment, and seven (26.9%) patients had received fourth- or later-line treatment. By the data cut-off date of August 10, 2021, the median follow-up was 7.49 months (range, 1.4–26.7 months). The ORR was 15.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4%–34.9%) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) cohort (N = 26) and 19.0% (95% CI, 5.4%–41.9%) in the per-protocol (PP) cohort (N = 21). The disease control rate was 69.2% (95% CI, 48.2%–85.7%) and 81.0% (95% CI, 58.1%–94.6%) in the ITT and PP cohorts, respectively. The median DoR was 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.1–5.1 months) in the ITT cohort. The median PFS was 4.37 months (95% CI, 2.50–5.29 months) in the ITT cohort and 4.37 months (95% CI, 2.50–9.76 months) in the PP cohort. The median OS was not reached, and the 12-month OS rate was 69% (95% CI, 45.1%–84.1%). Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 38.5% of patients, and the most common was peripheral neuropathy (23.1%, all Grade 3), which was manageable with dose modifications.
In this clinical trial, utidelone showed promising efficacy and had a manageable safety profile. Further clinical studies are warranted to confirm its role in NSCLC treatment.
No.NCT03693547; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov.
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous hematopoietic malignancy whose prognosis is associated with several biomarkers. Decitabine, a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitor, combined with cytarabine, aclarubicin hydrochloride, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (DCAG), has been used in patients newly diagnosed with AML. This regimen has been especially used in older and fragile patients who are immunocompromised or have co-morbidities, as well as those with specific gene mutations. However, the integration of molecular risk stratification and treatment guidance for the DCAG regimen has not been well defined. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the genetic mutations associated with AML and establish appropriate treatment strategies for patients newly diagnosed with AML.
This study analyzed the clinical data and genetic mutations based on next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 124 newly diagnosed patients with AML who received the DCAG regimen at the People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital from January 2008 to August 2020. Factors associated with the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) in patients newly diagnosed with AML were analyzed.
The most adverse prognosis of DCAG-treated patients was observed in those with FLT3-ITD, KIT, PTPN11, GATA2, or IDH1 mutations during univariable analysis, whereas PTPN11 mutation was solely significant in multivariable analysis, with an increased likelihood of CIR (P = 0.001) and reduced LFS duration (P = 0.077). Hyperleukocytosis was maintained as an independent risk factor for increased CIR risk (P = 0.044) and decreased LFS duration (P = 0.042) in multivariable analysis. In this study, we validated the risk classification of patients with AML receiving an epigenetic modifier-based induction regimen across a broad age range.
NGS demonstrated a dismal overall outcome in patients with the rare PTPN11 mutations, indicating the need for new therapies that target this high-risk subtype of AML. These results offer a potential molecular stratification and treatment guidance for patients with AML.
RNA splicing alterations are widespread and play critical roles in cancer pathogenesis and therapy. Lung cancer is highly heterogeneous and causes the most cancer-related deaths worldwide. Large-scale multi-omics studies have not only characterized the mutational landscapes but also discovered a plethora of transcriptional and post-transcriptional changes in lung cancer. Such resources have greatly facilitated the development of new diagnostic markers and therapeutic options over the past two decades. Intriguingly, altered RNA splicing has emerged as an important molecular feature and therapeutic target of lung cancer. In this review, we provide a brief overview of splicing dysregulation in lung cancer and summarize the recent progress on key splicing events and splicing factors that contribute to lung cancer pathogenesis. Moreover, we describe the general strategies targeting splicing alterations in lung cancer and highlight the potential of combining splicing modulation with currently approved therapies to combat this deadly disease. This review provides new mechanistic and therapeutic insights into splicing dysregulation in cancer.