Cardiology journal最新文献

Background: Stent underexpansion is a challenge in interventional cardiology. Some off-label treatments, such as rotational atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) and coronary lasing, have been used to overcome the problem. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of coronary laser atherectomy with simultaneous contrast injection and subsequent balloon dilation to optimize stent expansion.

Methods: Coronary laser atherectomy with simultaneous contrast injection was used. After lasing, non-compliant balloon dilation at high pressure was performed to overcome the underexpanded point. The average increase in the minimum stent area (MSA) was measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and any complication related to the technique was evaluated. Additionally, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), consisting of death from any cause, new myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR), were scrutinized in a long-term follow-up.

Results: Sixteen underexpanded stents were treated with laser between August 2017 and November 2022. In all cases but one, IVUS was used to evaluate the MSA before and after lasing. The MSA showed an average increase of 2.34 ± 1.57 mm² (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.47-3.21; p < 0.001) after laser application and balloon inflation. No complication related to the technique was detected. During a follow-up period of a median (interquartile range) of 457 (50-973) days, the combined MACE assessed by Kaplan-Meier estimator showed an event-free rate of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.59-1).

Conclusions: Coronary laser with simultaneous contrast injection is a safe method to optimize a stent underexpansion, with an acceptable event-free rate in long-term follow-up.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted many acute coronary syndrome (ACS) care aspects. The aim was to compare the patient profile, ACS characteristics, and the outcomes in patients referred to the invasive cardiology department before (March 2019 - February 2020) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020 - February 2021).

Methods: Clinical and demographic features, comorbidities, laboratory parameters at admission, and periprocedural data were recorded. The relationship of these parameters with in-hospital mortality was assessed.

Results: Before the COVID-19 pandemic, 664 patients were admitted due to ACS (mean age 67.16 ± 11.94 years, females 32.1%), and during the COVID-19 pandemic 545 ACS patients were recorded [mean age 66.02 ± 12.02 years (p = 0.463), females 31% (p = 0.706)]. A 17.8% decrease in the ACS rate was observed. During the pandemic, there were more STEMI patients (44.3% vs. 52.1%, p < 0.001) and fewer patients treated conservatively (24.9% vs. 8%, p < 0.001). Most lesions were located in the left anterior descending artery (53.4% vs. 54.7%), but post-percutaneous coronary intervention TIMI 3 was observed more frequently before the pandemic (83.9% vs. 75.1%, p < 0.001). Periprocedural complication rates did not differ between the groups. In-hospital outcomes did not differ between analyzed periods regarding all-cause death nor cardiac death rates, 5.3% vs. 4.6% (p = 0.598) and 4.5% vs. 3.7% (p = 0.473), respectively.

Conclusions: Based on the analysis of 1209 patients, a decrease in ACS patients admitted during the pandemic was recorded, but in-hospital mortality remained similar.

Backgroud: Left ventricular remodeling (LVR) is a major predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). This study aimed to prospectively evaluate LVR in patients with STEMI who were successfully treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and examine the relationship between early left ventricular dilation and late LVR.

Methods: Overall 301 consecutive patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI were included. Serial echocardiography was performed on the first day after PCI, on the day of discharge, at 1 month, and 6 months after discharge.

Results: Left ventricular remodeling occurred in 57 (18.9%) patients during follow-up. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) reduced from day 1 postoperative to discharge in the LVR group compared with that in the non-LVR (n-LVR) group. The rates of change in LVEDV (ΔLVEDV%) were -5.24 ± 16.02% and 5.05 ± 16.92%, respectively (p < 0.001). LVEDV increased in patients with LVR compared with n-LVR at 1-month and 6-month follow-ups (ΔLVEDV% 13.05 ± 14.89% vs. -1.9 ± 12.03%; 26.46 ± 14.05% vs. -3.42 ± 10.77%, p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that early changes in LVEDV, including ΔLVEDV% at discharge and 1-month postoperative, predicted late LVR with an area under the curve value of 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.74-0.87, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Decreased LVEDV at discharge and increased LVEDV at 1-month follow-up were both associated with late LVR at 6-month. Comprehensive and early monitoring of LVEDV changes may help to predict LVR.

Background: Liver dysfunction contributes to worse clinical outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients. However, studies exploring temporal evolutions of liver function parameters in chronic HF (CHF) pa- tients, and their associations with clinical outcome, are scarce. Detailed temporal patterns of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGTP), total bilirubin (TBIL) and albumin (ALB) were investigated, and their relation with clinical outcome, in patients with stable CHF with reduced ejection fraction.

Methods: Tri-monthly plasma samples were collected from 250 patients during 2.2 (1.4-2.5) years of follow-up. ALP, GGTP, ALB, and TBIL were measured in 749 selected samples and the relationship between repeatedly measured biomarker levels and the primary endpoint (PEP; composite of cardiovas- cular death, heart transplantation, left ventricular assist device implantation, and hospitalization for worsened HF) was evaluated by joint models.

Results: Mean age was 66 ± 13 years; 74% were men, 25% in New York Heart Association class III-IV. 66 (26%) patients reached the PEP. Repeatedly measured levels of TBIL, ALP, GGTP, and ALB were associated with the PEP after adjustment for N-terminal prohormone B-type natriuretic peptide and high sensitivity troponin T (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] per doubling of biomarker level: 1.98 [1.32; 2.95], p = 0.002; 1.84 [1.09; 3.05], p = 0.018, 1.33 [1.08; 1.63], p = 0.006 and 1.14 [1.09; 1.20], p < 0.001, respectively). Serial levels of ALP and GGTP, and slopes of the temporal evolutions of ALB and TBIL, adjusted for clinical variables, were also significantly associated with the PEP.

Conclusions: Changes in serum levels of TBIL, ALP, GGTP, and ALB precede adverse cardiovascular events in patients with CHF. These routine liver function parameters may provide additional prognostic information in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction patients in clinical practice.

The diagnosis of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is made when the estimated glomerular filtration rate is less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m2. Most patients with that stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD) are eligible for renal replacement treatment, which includes kidney transplantation, hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. It is well recognized that CKD raises the risk of cardiovascular disease and is linked to a higher cardiovascular death rate in this population. Additionally, the largest risk of cardiovascular events is seen in ESRD patients. Heart failure (HF) and dangerous arrhythmias, which are more common in the advanced stages of CKD, are two additional causes of cardiovascular death in addition to atherosclerosis-related complications such as myocardial infarction and stroke. In this review the significance of natriuretic peptides and other HF biomarkers in hemodialysis patients, as tools for cardiovascular risk assessment will be discussed.

Introduction: Predictors of heart failure with recovered ejection fraction (HFrecEF) remain to be fully elucidated. This study investigated the impact of heart rate and its change on the recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

Material and methods: From 398 outpatients who had a history of hospitalisation for heart failure, 138 subjects diagnosed as HFrEF (LVEF < 40%) on heart failure hospitalisation were enrolled and longitudinally surveyed. During follow-up periods more than one year, 64 and 46 patients were identified as HFrecEF (improved LVEF to ≥ 40% and its increase of ≥ 10 points) and persistent HFrEF, respectively.

Results: In the overall subjects, the reduction of heart rate through the observation periods was closely correlated with the improvement of LVEF (r = -0.508, p < 0.001). Heart rate on hospital admission for heart failure was markedly higher in patients with HFrecEF (112 ± 26 bpm) than in those with persistent HFrEF (90±18 bpm). Whereas heart rate at the first outpatient visit after discharge was already lower in the HFrecEF group (80 ± 13 vs. 85 ± 13 bpm in the persistent HFrEF group). A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the decrease in heart rate from admission to the first visit after discharge was a significant determinant of HFrecEF (p < 0.001), independently of confounding factors such as ischemic heart disease and baseline LVEF and left ventricular dimension.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that heart rate reduction in the early phase after heart failure onset is a powerful independent predictor of the subsequent recovery of LVEF in HFrEF patients.