Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-05-30DOI: 10.5603/cj.101925
Maksymilian J Mielczarek, Tomasz Michalski, Wojciech Wańha, Dariusz Ciećwierz, Grzegorz Smolka, Marta Marcinkowska, Michał Chmielecki, Brunon Tomasiewicz, Piotr Kubler, Michał Kasprzak, Marta Chamera, Jarosław Gorol, Stanisław Bartuś, Jacek Kubica, Krzysztof Reczuch, Michał Hawranek, Andrzej Ochała, Wojciech Wojakowski, Marcin Gruchała, Miłosz Jaguszewski
Background: Stentys drug-eluting stent (Stentys DES) was proposed to possess potential benefits over balloon-expandable platforms in large bifurcations, mainly distal left main stem (LMS). Several registries demonstrated favourable one-year clinical results of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using Stentys DES for LMS disease. However, long-term follow- up data have been lacking hitherto.
Methods: The study enrolled 175 consecutive patients who underwent PCI with Stentys DES for unprotected LMS and categorized them into acute- and chronic coronary syndrome (ACS/CCS). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) composed of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and stroke assessed at five years. The secondary endpoints were stent thrombosis (ST), restenosis and target vessel revascularization (TVR).
Results: Clinical follow-up at five years was completed for 124 out of 175 patients (70.9%), encompassing 85 with ACS and 39 with CCS. At five years, MACCE occurred in 55 out of 124 patients (44.4%). Although, there was a higher rate of MACCE (53% vs 28.2%, p = 0.018), MI (27.1% vs 2.6%, p = 0.016) and TLR (20% vs 2.6%, p = 0.036) in ACS vs. CCS patients, the rates of cardiac deaths were similar (27.1% vs. 25.6%, p = 0.77, respectively).
Conclusions: Herein, favourable long-term outcome of LMS PCI with Stentys DES in the CCS setting are shown. In the ACS setting, worse one-year outcome persisted at five years and was partially related to high rate of acute/subacute ST that might be optimized by immediate loading with potent antiplatelet drugs.
背景:Stentys药物洗脱支架(Stentys DES)被认为在大分叉,主要是左主干(LMS)远端具有比球囊可膨胀平台更大的潜在优势。几个注册显示使用Stentys DES治疗LMS疾病的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)一年的临床效果良好。然而,长期的随访资料一直缺乏。方法:该研究招募了175例连续使用Stentys DES接受PCI治疗无保护LMS的患者,并将其分为急性和慢性冠状动脉综合征(ACS/CCS)。主要终点是主要心脏和大脑不良事件(MACCE),包括心源性死亡、心肌梗死(MI)、靶病变血运重建术(TLR)和5年卒中评估。次要终点为支架内血栓形成(ST)、再狭窄和靶血管重建术(TVR)。结果:175例患者中有124例(70.9%)完成了5年的临床随访,其中85例为ACS, 39例为CCS。5年时,124例患者中有55例(44.4%)发生MACCE。虽然ACS与CCS患者的MACCE (53% vs 28.2%, p = 0.018)、MI (27.1% vs 2.6%, p = 0.016)和TLR (20% vs 2.6%, p = 0.036)发生率较高,但心源性死亡率相似(27.1% vs 25.6%, p = 0.77)。结论:在此,LMS PCI与Stentys DES在CCS环境下的长期预后良好。在ACS患者中,较差的1年预后持续到5年,这部分与急性/亚急性ST发生率高有关,这可能通过立即加载强效抗血小板药物来优化。
{"title":"Long-term safety and efficacy of self-apposing Stentys drug-eluting stent in left main stem percutaneous coronary intervention: final results of multicentre LM-STENTYS registry.","authors":"Maksymilian J Mielczarek, Tomasz Michalski, Wojciech Wańha, Dariusz Ciećwierz, Grzegorz Smolka, Marta Marcinkowska, Michał Chmielecki, Brunon Tomasiewicz, Piotr Kubler, Michał Kasprzak, Marta Chamera, Jarosław Gorol, Stanisław Bartuś, Jacek Kubica, Krzysztof Reczuch, Michał Hawranek, Andrzej Ochała, Wojciech Wojakowski, Marcin Gruchała, Miłosz Jaguszewski","doi":"10.5603/cj.101925","DOIUrl":"10.5603/cj.101925","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stentys drug-eluting stent (Stentys DES) was proposed to possess potential benefits over balloon-expandable platforms in large bifurcations, mainly distal left main stem (LMS). Several registries demonstrated favourable one-year clinical results of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using Stentys DES for LMS disease. However, long-term follow- up data have been lacking hitherto.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study enrolled 175 consecutive patients who underwent PCI with Stentys DES for unprotected LMS and categorized them into acute- and chronic coronary syndrome (ACS/CCS). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) composed of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and stroke assessed at five years. The secondary endpoints were stent thrombosis (ST), restenosis and target vessel revascularization (TVR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical follow-up at five years was completed for 124 out of 175 patients (70.9%), encompassing 85 with ACS and 39 with CCS. At five years, MACCE occurred in 55 out of 124 patients (44.4%). Although, there was a higher rate of MACCE (53% vs 28.2%, p = 0.018), MI (27.1% vs 2.6%, p = 0.016) and TLR (20% vs 2.6%, p = 0.036) in ACS vs. CCS patients, the rates of cardiac deaths were similar (27.1% vs. 25.6%, p = 0.77, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Herein, favourable long-term outcome of LMS PCI with Stentys DES in the CCS setting are shown. In the ACS setting, worse one-year outcome persisted at five years and was partially related to high rate of acute/subacute ST that might be optimized by immediate loading with potent antiplatelet drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":" ","pages":"239-247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12221320/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144188701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Early-onset severe cardiomyopathy in a Danon disease patient with a novel LAMP2 mutation.","authors":"Keyi Mei, Hanlin Zhang, Ming Yang, Xiaoxiao Guo","doi":"10.5603/cj.103640","DOIUrl":"10.5603/cj.103640","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":"32 5","pages":"530-531"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12582789/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145403209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Anna M Imiela, Katarzyna Kurnicka, Dorota Piotrowska-Kownacka, Marek Gołębiowski, Piotr Pruszczyk
{"title":"Unique coincidence of mitral valve prolapse and left ventricular hypertrabeculation in a patient with ventricular arrythmia.","authors":"Anna M Imiela, Katarzyna Kurnicka, Dorota Piotrowska-Kownacka, Marek Gołębiowski, Piotr Pruszczyk","doi":"10.5603/cj.102843","DOIUrl":"10.5603/cj.102843","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":"32 4","pages":"440-441"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410918/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144982388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Łukasz Leśnowolski, Aleksandra Dudek, Jacek Lewandowski, Piotr Jędrusik, Piotr Abramczyk
{"title":"Hyperkalemia: Is it always about slow rhytm?","authors":"Łukasz Leśnowolski, Aleksandra Dudek, Jacek Lewandowski, Piotr Jędrusik, Piotr Abramczyk","doi":"10.5603/cj.103837","DOIUrl":"10.5603/cj.103837","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":"32 4","pages":"442-443"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410940/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144982427","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2024-12-20DOI: 10.5603/cj.101837
Tomasz Podolecki, Robert Pudlo, Michał Mazurek, Monika Kozieł-Siołkowska, Joanna Boidol, Oskar Kowalski, Radosław Lenarczyk, Zbigniew Kalarus
Background: The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and clinical significance of depression in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (CRT-D). The study was also to evaluate the impact of shock therapy on depression development and long-term prognosis.
Methods: The prospective study encompassed 396 consecutive heart failure (HF) patients implanted with CRT-D. All patients completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and underwent a psychiatric examination at baseline. 221 patients free of depressive symptoms at baseline were included into the final analysis. The assessment of psychiatric status was routinely repeated every 6 months as well as after the shock delivery. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of death or hospitalization for HF.
Results: During long-term observation (median 37.1 months) 52 (23.5%) patients suffered from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock, whereas 48 (21.8%) subjects developed depression. The incidence of new-onset depression was significantly higher in patients after shock delivery (Shock Group), CRT non-responders and subjects with atrial fibrillation. The risk for a composite endpoint was higher in the Shock Group than subjects without an ICD intervention: 57.7% vs. 25.4% and in patients with new-onset depression compared to the population free of this disorder: 62.5% vs. 24.9% (all p < 0.001). New-onset depression (HR 1.7) and an ICD shock (HR 2.1) were strong independent predictors of poor prognosis.
Conclusions: Depression is a common mental disorder in CRT-D recipients, that adversely affects long-term prognosis. Subjects suffering from ICD shocks and those with HF progression are at higher risk of experiencing depressive symptoms.
{"title":"The impact of shock therapy on depression development and remote prognosis in cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients.","authors":"Tomasz Podolecki, Robert Pudlo, Michał Mazurek, Monika Kozieł-Siołkowska, Joanna Boidol, Oskar Kowalski, Radosław Lenarczyk, Zbigniew Kalarus","doi":"10.5603/cj.101837","DOIUrl":"10.5603/cj.101837","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and clinical significance of depression in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (CRT-D). The study was also to evaluate the impact of shock therapy on depression development and long-term prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The prospective study encompassed 396 consecutive heart failure (HF) patients implanted with CRT-D. All patients completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and underwent a psychiatric examination at baseline. 221 patients free of depressive symptoms at baseline were included into the final analysis. The assessment of psychiatric status was routinely repeated every 6 months as well as after the shock delivery. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of death or hospitalization for HF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During long-term observation (median 37.1 months) 52 (23.5%) patients suffered from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock, whereas 48 (21.8%) subjects developed depression. The incidence of new-onset depression was significantly higher in patients after shock delivery (Shock Group), CRT non-responders and subjects with atrial fibrillation. The risk for a composite endpoint was higher in the Shock Group than subjects without an ICD intervention: 57.7% vs. 25.4% and in patients with new-onset depression compared to the population free of this disorder: 62.5% vs. 24.9% (all p < 0.001). New-onset depression (HR 1.7) and an ICD shock (HR 2.1) were strong independent predictors of poor prognosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Depression is a common mental disorder in CRT-D recipients, that adversely affects long-term prognosis. Subjects suffering from ICD shocks and those with HF progression are at higher risk of experiencing depressive symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":" ","pages":"26-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11870010/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142866638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-03-20DOI: 10.5603/cj.99973
Jacek Kubica, Piotr Adamski, Jolita Badariene, Marc Bonaca, Piotr Buszman, Rahima Gabulova, Robert Gajda, Tobias Geisler, Robert Gil, Diana A Gorog, Paul A Gurbel, Tomasz Hajdukiewicz, Bartosz Hudzik, Stefan James, Young-Hoon Jeong, Adam Kern, Wacław Kochman, Aldona Kubica, Wiktor Kuliczkowski, Przemysław Magielski, Piotr Niezgoda, Małgorzata Ostrowska, Paolo Raggi, Uzeyir Rahimov, Grzegorz Skonieczny, Jolanta M Siller-Matula, Giuseppe Specchia, Łukasz Szarpak, Paweł Szymański, Udaya Tantry, Julia Umińska, Eliano Pio Navarese
The 2023 ESC guidelines changed previously recommended a strategy of early treatment in patients with STEMI. Pre-treatment with a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor may be considered in patients undergoing a primary PCI strategy (Class IIb, Level of evidence B). However, the available scientific evidence justifies a personalized approach differentiating the indications for pre-treatment with oral P2Y12 receptor inhibitors depending on the concomitant administration of opioids. In our opinion, in patients undergoing primary PCI not treated with opioids, pre-treatment with an oral P2Y12 receptor inhibitor should be applied, while in patients undergoing primary PCI treated with opioids, pre-treatment with an oral P2Y12 receptor inhibitor should be considered.
{"title":"Early treatment with inhibitors of P2Y12 receptor in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction - 2023 ESC recommendations and scientific evidence. Is clinical evidence sufficient to suggest a move towards precision medicine? The ELECTRA-SIRIO 2 investigators' viewpoint.","authors":"Jacek Kubica, Piotr Adamski, Jolita Badariene, Marc Bonaca, Piotr Buszman, Rahima Gabulova, Robert Gajda, Tobias Geisler, Robert Gil, Diana A Gorog, Paul A Gurbel, Tomasz Hajdukiewicz, Bartosz Hudzik, Stefan James, Young-Hoon Jeong, Adam Kern, Wacław Kochman, Aldona Kubica, Wiktor Kuliczkowski, Przemysław Magielski, Piotr Niezgoda, Małgorzata Ostrowska, Paolo Raggi, Uzeyir Rahimov, Grzegorz Skonieczny, Jolanta M Siller-Matula, Giuseppe Specchia, Łukasz Szarpak, Paweł Szymański, Udaya Tantry, Julia Umińska, Eliano Pio Navarese","doi":"10.5603/cj.99973","DOIUrl":"10.5603/cj.99973","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 2023 ESC guidelines changed previously recommended a strategy of early treatment in patients with STEMI. Pre-treatment with a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor may be considered in patients undergoing a primary PCI strategy (Class IIb, Level of evidence B). However, the available scientific evidence justifies a personalized approach differentiating the indications for pre-treatment with oral P2Y12 receptor inhibitors depending on the concomitant administration of opioids. In our opinion, in patients undergoing primary PCI not treated with opioids, pre-treatment with an oral P2Y12 receptor inhibitor should be applied, while in patients undergoing primary PCI treated with opioids, pre-treatment with an oral P2Y12 receptor inhibitor should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":" ","pages":"189-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12068194/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143665729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-01-01Epub Date: 2025-03-20DOI: 10.5603/cj.100458
Nadine Molitor, Vera Graup, Daniel Hofer, Pascal Rüegg, Deniza Avdi, Ardan M Saguner, Alexander Breitenstein, Jan Steffel
Background: Infections related to cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Antibiotic-eluting envelopes have been introduced as a technology to prevent CIED infections. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the antibacterial envelope in the real-world population of a tertiary center.
Methods: This cohort study includes consecutively enrolled patients undergoing a device procedure from 01/2014 to 12/2020 at the University Hospital in Zurich. During period A (01/2014-12/2019) antibacterial envelopes were not used, whereas during period B (01/2020-12/2020) antibacterial envelopes were used in all device interventions. Follow-up was conducted by assessing all available patient records from patient visits and hospitalization.
Results: 1757 patients (male 70.5%, mean age 67.1 ± 16 years), were analyzed during a follow-up of 24 months. In 302 patients (17.2%) an antibacterial envelope was used. The overall occurrence of a device infection was low (n = 15, 0.85%). Factors that were associated with the incidence of an infection were not undergoing a primary implantation procedure (p = 0.024) and a CRT-P/D intervention (p = 0.022). There was no difference in the rate of infection between patients in whom a bacterial envelope was implanted vs. those in whom it was not used (0.6 vs. 0.9%, p = 0.693).
Conclusion: In a contemporary cohort of consecutive, unselected patients undergoing a device intervention at a large tertiary care center, the rate of device infection was low and not significantly different with vs. without the use of an antibacterial envelope. The data have important practical as well as economic implications for physicians performing such procedures.
背景:与心脏植入式电子装置(CIED)相关的感染具有显著的发病率和死亡率。抗生素洗脱包膜作为一种预防CIED感染的技术已经被引入。本研究的目的是评估抗菌包膜的有效性在现实世界的人口三级中心。方法:该队列研究包括2014年1月至2020年12月在苏黎世大学医院接受器械手术的连续入组患者。A期(2014年1月- 2019年12月)未使用抗菌信封,而B期(2020年1月- 2020年12月)所有器械干预均使用抗菌信封。通过评估所有可获得的患者就诊和住院记录进行随访。结果:随访24个月,共纳入1757例患者,男性70.5%,平均年龄67.1±16岁。302例患者(17.2%)使用抗菌包膜。器械感染的总体发生率较低(n = 15, 0.85%)。与感染发生率相关的因素是未接受初次植入手术(p = 0.024)和CRT-P/D干预(p = 0.022)。植入细菌包膜的患者与未使用细菌包膜的患者之间的感染率没有差异(0.6 vs 0.9%, p = 0.693)。结论:在一个大型三级医疗中心连续的、未选择的患者队列中,使用抗菌膜的器械感染率很低,与不使用抗菌膜的器械感染率没有显著差异。这些数据对医生进行此类手术具有重要的实际意义和经济意义。
{"title":"The effect of an antibacterial envelope on cardiac implantable device-related infection - A real-world analysis from a tertiary center.","authors":"Nadine Molitor, Vera Graup, Daniel Hofer, Pascal Rüegg, Deniza Avdi, Ardan M Saguner, Alexander Breitenstein, Jan Steffel","doi":"10.5603/cj.100458","DOIUrl":"10.5603/cj.100458","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infections related to cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Antibiotic-eluting envelopes have been introduced as a technology to prevent CIED infections. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the antibacterial envelope in the real-world population of a tertiary center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study includes consecutively enrolled patients undergoing a device procedure from 01/2014 to 12/2020 at the University Hospital in Zurich. During period A (01/2014-12/2019) antibacterial envelopes were not used, whereas during period B (01/2020-12/2020) antibacterial envelopes were used in all device interventions. Follow-up was conducted by assessing all available patient records from patient visits and hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1757 patients (male 70.5%, mean age 67.1 ± 16 years), were analyzed during a follow-up of 24 months. In 302 patients (17.2%) an antibacterial envelope was used. The overall occurrence of a device infection was low (n = 15, 0.85%). Factors that were associated with the incidence of an infection were not undergoing a primary implantation procedure (p = 0.024) and a CRT-P/D intervention (p = 0.022). There was no difference in the rate of infection between patients in whom a bacterial envelope was implanted vs. those in whom it was not used (0.6 vs. 0.9%, p = 0.693).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a contemporary cohort of consecutive, unselected patients undergoing a device intervention at a large tertiary care center, the rate of device infection was low and not significantly different with vs. without the use of an antibacterial envelope. The data have important practical as well as economic implications for physicians performing such procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":" ","pages":"301-307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12221329/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143665743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}