CJEM最新文献

Background: Emergency department (ED) crowding is a significant challenge to providing safe and quality care to patients. We know that hospital and ED crowding is exacerbated on Mondays because fewer in-patients are discharged on the weekend. We evaluated barriers and potential solutions to improve in-patient flow and diminished weekend discharges, in hopes of decreasing the severe ED crowding observed on Mondays.

Methods: In this observational study, we conducted interviews of (a) leaders at The Ottawa Hospital, a major academic health sciences centre (nursing, allied health, physicians), and (b) leaders of community facilities (long-term care and chronic hospital) that receive patients from the hospital, and (c) home care. Each interview was conducted individually and addressed perceived barriers to the discharge of hospital in-patients on weekends as well as potential solutions. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted whereby themes were organized into a summary table of barriers and solutions.

Results: We interviewed 40 leaders including 30 nursing, physician, and allied health leaders from the hospital as well as 10 senior personnel from community facilities and home care. Many barriers to weekend discharges were identified, highlighting that this problem is complex with many interdependent internal and external factors. Fortunately, many specific potential solutions were suggested, in immediate, short-term and long-term time horizons. While many solutions require additional resources, others require a culture change whereby hospital and community stakeholders recognize that services must be provided consistently, seven days a week.

Interpretation: We have identified the complex and interdependent barriers to weekend discharges of in-patients. There are numerous specific opportunities for hospital staff and services, physicians, and community facilities to provide the same patient care on weekends as on weekdays. This will lead to improved patient flow and safety, and to decreased ED crowding on Mondays.

Objectives: Intranasal (IN) midazolam is the most common anxiolytic for children in the emergency department (ED), but evidence of benefit is conflicting. We synthesized the evidence on IN midazolam for procedural distress in children undergoing ED painful procedures.

Methods: We included trials involving painful ED procedures in children 0-18 years involving IN midazolam. Primary outcome was procedural distress. We summarized results using Tricco et al.'s classification of "neutral" (p ≥ 0.05), "favorable," and "unfavorable" (p < 0.05), supporting IN midazolam or comparator, respectively, or "indeterminate" (unable to judge). Where possible, we pooled results using meta-analysis. Methodologic quality of evidence was evaluated using Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool and GRADE system.

Results: We included 41 trials (n = 2973 participants). Thirty trials involved intravenous insertion. IN midazolam was superior to placebo (RR = 7.2; 95% CI: 3.43, 15.25; 3 trials; I² = 0%). However, 56-90% of the IN midazolam group resisted the procedure. Focusing on the three trials that used validated measures, IN midazolam was "neutral" versus IN ketamine and either "neutral" or "unfavorable" versus IN dexmedetomidine. There was no difference in the proportion of children with a satisfactory distress score between IN midazolam and oral midazolam (RR = 1.1; 95% CI: 0.74, 1.73; 2 trials; I² = 53%), IN ketamine (RR = 1.1; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.25; 6 trials; I² = 0%), or IN dexmedetomidine (RR = 0.4; 95% CI: 0.17, 1.05; 3 trials; I² = 84%). Ten trials involved laceration repair. IN midazolam was "favorable" versus placebo; however, both groups scored in the anxious range. There was no difference in distress between IN midazolam and oral midazolam (SMD = 0.01; 95% CI:-0.32, 0.34; 2 trials; I² = 0%) (Fig. 3E) [64,65]. Using validated instruments, IN midazolam was "unfavorable" versus IN dexmedetomidine but "favorable" versus oral diazepam and placebo.

Conclusions: There is limited methodologically rigorous evidence that IN midazolam is better than placebo for IV insertion and laceration repair. At the doses studied, preliminary evidence suggests that IN dexmedetomidine may be superior to IN midazolam for both IV insertion and laceration repair.

Background: We believe that hospital and emergency department (ED) crowding is exacerbated on Mondays because fewer in-patients are discharged on the weekend. In part 1 of 3 concurrent studies, we documented the number of weekend discharges and the extent of hospital and ED crowding on the days following weekends.

Methods: We conducted a data analysis study at The Ottawa Hospital, a major academic health sciences center with two EDs. We created reports of the 18-month period (January 1, 2022-June 30, 2023) regarding the status of in-patients at the two campuses. We compared the total admissions, discharges, and hospital occupancy on weekends (or long weekends), the Monday following weekends (or Tuesday following long weekends), or Tuesdays-Fridays. For these three time periods, we also compared the proportion of ED beds occupied by admitted patients to all ED beds, as well as the proportion of days with > 70% admitted patients housed in the ED at 8:00am.

Results: Our data for 55,692 patients demonstrated that on weekends compared to weekdays, there were almost 50% fewer discharges with the ratio of admissions to discharges averaging 1.16 (95% CI 1.10-1.22). This was accompanied by a 2.4% absolute increase (P < 0.001) in hospital occupancy on Mondays or Tuesdays, often exceeding 100%. Both EDs are particularly crowded on these Mondays and Tuesdays with the proportion of admitted patients to regular ED beds averaging 68%. We observed serious crowding with > 70% occupancy with admitted patients on almost 50% of Mondays.

Interpretation: We have demonstrated that there are much fewer discharges on weekends, and this is associated with significant hospital and ED crowding on Mondays. This blocks safe and timely access to beds for newly arriving patients in the ED. These results should spur Canadian hospitals to evaluate their own data and seek solutions to this important problem.

Background: Hospital and emergency department (ED) crowding is exacerbated on Mondays because fewer in-patients are discharged during the weekend. We evaluated the experiences and attitudes of in-patient ward nurses to better understand the challenges they face when considering the weekend discharge of their patients.

Methods: We conducted a qualitative study of in-patient ward nurses, using the theoretical domains framework (TDF), at two campuses of a major academic health sciences centre. The interview guides consisted of, first, a series of questions to explore the typical processes involved for safe patient discharges and, second, exploration of the influence of the 14 TDF domains. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and anonymized and then imported into NVivo qualitative software for data management and analysis. Analysis was conducted in three stages (coding, generation of specific beliefs, identification of relevant and nonrelevant domains).

Results: The 28 interviewed nurses represented a variety of medical, surgical and other wards, and reported being acutely aware of the pressures to discharge patients on weekends (knowledge). They believed that increasing weekend discharges would improve hospital flow and aid in decanting the ED (beliefs about consequences). However, they also acknowledged that the weekend discharge pressures might result in patients being discharged prematurely and bouncing back to the hospital (beliefs about consequences). Overall, the nurses reported that as a hospital culture, discharging patients was not much of a priority (goals; environmental context and resources).

Conclusion: We know there are much fewer discharges on weekends, and this is associated with significant hospital and ED crowding on Mondays. This study has illuminated the many challenges faced by in-patient ward nurses when considering the discharge of admitted patients on weekends. In order to decrease ED and hospital crowding related to decreased weekend discharges, hospitals will need to effect a culture change amongst all staff.

Objective: Based on programs implemented in 2011-2013 in three Canadian provinces to improve the support paramedics provide to people receiving palliative care, the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer and Healthcare Excellence Canada provided support and funding from 2018 to 2022 to spread this approach in Canada. The study objectives were to conduct an economic evaluation of "the Program" compared to the status quo.

Methods: A probabilistic decision analytic model was used to compare the expected costs, the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the return on investment associated with the Program compared to the status quo from a publicly funded healthcare payer perspective. Effectiveness data and Program costs, expressed in 2022 Canadian dollars, from each jurisdiction were supplemented with literature data. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses varying key model assumptions were conducted.

Results: Analyses of 5416 9-1-1 calls from five jurisdictions where paramedics provided support to people with palliative care needs between April 1, 2020 and March 31, 2022 indicated that 60% of the 9-1-1 calls under the Program enabled people to avoid transport to the emergency department and receive palliative care at home. Treating people at home saved paramedics an average of 31 min (range from 15 to 67). The Program was associated with cost savings of $2773 (95% confidence interval [CI] $1539-$4352) and an additional 0.00069 QALYs (95% CI 0.00024-0.00137) per 9-1-1 palliative care call. The Program return on investment was $4.6 for every $1 invested. Threshold analyses indicated that in order to be cost saving, 33% of 9-1-1 calls should be treated at home under the Program, the Program should generate a minimum of 97 calls per year with each call costing no more than $2773.

Conclusion: The Program was cost-effective in the majority of the scenarios examined. These results support the implementation of paramedic-based palliative care at home programs in Canada.