Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1007/s43678-025-01063-5
P Olszynski, C Bell, D J Kim
{"title":"Other people's money: why healthcare systems fail to reinvest in POCUS.","authors":"P Olszynski, C Bell, D J Kim","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-01063-5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-01063-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":"27 12","pages":"939-940"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145716966","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-06-04DOI: 10.1007/s43678-025-00928-z
Richard Golonka, Mary V Modayil, Razieh Mansouri, Fayaz Kurji, Jane Q Huang, Wei Zhao, Denise Watt, Jake Hayward, Patricia Chambers, Carolyn Grolman, Judy Seidel, Robin L Walker
Objectives: Alberta's Virtual MD program was established to enhance nurse tele-triage and divert low-acuity patients from the emergency department (ED). This study describes the use of Virtual MD and its impact on healthcare utilization.
Methods: Demographic and clinical characteristics of Virtual MD patients were compared with Health Link 811 callers and the overall Alberta population between April 1, 2022, and March 31, 2023. Virtual MD recommendations included seeing a primary care provider, going to ED/urgent care, and self-management at home. Concordance with recommendations was determined using linked health administrative data.
Results: Virtual MD patients (n = 19,312) had a mean age of 34.8 years and were mostly female (62.3%). Compared to Health Link 811 callers, Virtual MD patients were slightly older (≥ 55 years) (20.8% vs. 25.0%). Of patients called within 4 h, 55.7% visited primary care within 14 days as advised, 60.0% visited ED within 2 days as advised and 52.5% of those advised to self-manage care at home did not use any healthcare within 14 days. Those advised to seek primary care had a higher odds [OR = 1.65 (95%CI: 1.24-2.21)] of family practice-sensitive conditions when they presented at ED compared to those advised to seek ED care. Hospitalization within 2 weeks was lower for patients advised to see primary care compared to those advised to see ED [4 h callback: OR = 0.33 (95%CI: 0.26 - 0.43), 24 h callback: OR = 0.15 (95%CI 0.08 - 0.28)].
Conclusion: Virtual MD effectively triaged patients, with over half following through on recommendations to see primary care, see ED, or self-manage care at home. Patients referred to primary care, but instead choosing to visit ED, were more likely to present with family practice-sensitive conditions, demonstrating appropriateness of the initial primary care advice. Overall, the Virtual MD service enables patients to access more appropriate levels of care for their healthcare needs.
目的:建立艾伯塔省的虚拟医学博士计划,以加强护士远程分诊和转移急诊科(ED)的低视力患者。本研究描述了虚拟医学的使用及其对医疗保健利用的影响。方法:比较2022年4月1日至2023年3月31日期间Health Link 811呼叫者和艾伯塔省总人口中虚拟MD患者的人口学和临床特征。虚拟医学博士的建议包括看初级保健提供者,去急诊科/紧急护理,以及在家自我管理。使用相关的卫生管理数据确定与建议的一致性。结果:虚拟MD患者(n = 19312)平均年龄34.8岁,以女性为主(62.3%)。与Health Link 811呼叫者相比,虚拟MD患者年龄稍大(≥55岁)(20.8% vs. 25.0%)。在4小时内打电话的患者中,55.7%在建议的14天内就诊,60.0%在建议的2天内就诊,52.5%被建议在家自我管理护理的患者在14天内没有使用任何医疗服务。那些被建议寻求初级保健的患者在急诊科就诊时,与那些被建议寻求急诊科治疗的患者相比,有更高的几率[OR = 1.65 (95%CI: 1.24-2.21)]出现对家庭实践敏感的疾病。与建议看急诊的患者相比,建议看初级保健的患者2周内住院率更低[4小时回诊:OR = 0.33 (95%CI: 0.26 - 0.43), 24小时回诊:OR = 0.15 (95%CI 0.08 - 0.28)]。结论:虚拟医学有效地对患者进行了分类,超过一半的患者按照建议去看初级保健、看急诊科或在家自我管理护理。患者转到初级保健,而不是选择访问急诊科,更有可能呈现家庭实践敏感的条件,证明了最初的初级保健建议的适当性。总的来说,虚拟医学博士服务使患者能够获得更合适的护理水平,以满足他们的医疗保健需求。
{"title":"Health system utilization following medical advice from Alberta's Virtual MD: a descriptive analysis.","authors":"Richard Golonka, Mary V Modayil, Razieh Mansouri, Fayaz Kurji, Jane Q Huang, Wei Zhao, Denise Watt, Jake Hayward, Patricia Chambers, Carolyn Grolman, Judy Seidel, Robin L Walker","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-00928-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s43678-025-00928-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Alberta's Virtual MD program was established to enhance nurse tele-triage and divert low-acuity patients from the emergency department (ED). This study describes the use of Virtual MD and its impact on healthcare utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographic and clinical characteristics of Virtual MD patients were compared with Health Link 811 callers and the overall Alberta population between April 1, 2022, and March 31, 2023. Virtual MD recommendations included seeing a primary care provider, going to ED/urgent care, and self-management at home. Concordance with recommendations was determined using linked health administrative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Virtual MD patients (n = 19,312) had a mean age of 34.8 years and were mostly female (62.3%). Compared to Health Link 811 callers, Virtual MD patients were slightly older (≥ 55 years) (20.8% vs. 25.0%). Of patients called within 4 h, 55.7% visited primary care within 14 days as advised, 60.0% visited ED within 2 days as advised and 52.5% of those advised to self-manage care at home did not use any healthcare within 14 days. Those advised to seek primary care had a higher odds [OR = 1.65 (95%CI: 1.24-2.21)] of family practice-sensitive conditions when they presented at ED compared to those advised to seek ED care. Hospitalization within 2 weeks was lower for patients advised to see primary care compared to those advised to see ED [4 h callback: OR = 0.33 (95%CI: 0.26 - 0.43), 24 h callback: OR = 0.15 (95%CI 0.08 - 0.28)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Virtual MD effectively triaged patients, with over half following through on recommendations to see primary care, see ED, or self-manage care at home. Patients referred to primary care, but instead choosing to visit ED, were more likely to present with family practice-sensitive conditions, demonstrating appropriateness of the initial primary care advice. Overall, the Virtual MD service enables patients to access more appropriate levels of care for their healthcare needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"974-983"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12695989/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144217856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-11-12DOI: 10.1007/s43678-025-01026-w
Logan Haynes, Travis Black, Philip J Davis, Taofiq Olusegun Oyedokun, Sachin V Trivedi
Objectives: D-dimer testing can reduce imaging utilization in the workup of pulmonary embolism, but the optimal cutoff remains unclear. The conventional D-dimer cutoff is < 500 µg/L Fibrinogen Equivalent Units, while the age-adjusted cutoff in patients over 50 is age × 10. Newer probability-adjusted strategies-the YEARS criteria and PEGeD algorithm-allow a higher threshold (D-dimer < 1000 µg/L) for select low-risk patients. We aimed to retrospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of four evidence-based pathways to exclude pulmonary embolism without imaging among our emergency department patients who were imaged.
Methods: A historical patient cohort was generated including all adults who received computed tomography pulmonary angiography or ventilation-perfusion scans after D-dimer testing in three emergency departments in a large urban Canadian center. Electronic medical records were reviewed to retrospectively compare the test performance of four D-dimer pathways: (i) conventional, (ii) age-adjusted, (iii) YEARS, and (iv) PEGeD.
Results: Of 1092 patients, 129 had pulmonary embolism. Conventional and age-adjusted cutoffs were both 100% sensitive (95% CI, 97.1-100.0), with specificities of 3.5% (2.5-4.9) and 6.4% (5.1-8.2). YEARS was 93.8% sensitive (88.2-96.8) and 30.4% specific (27.6-33.4), with PPV of 15.3% (13.0-18.0) and NPV of 97.3% (94.8-98.6). PEGeD was the least sensitive (92.2%, 86.3-95.7), but most specific (39.1%, 36.1-42.3), with PPV of 16.9% (14.3-19.8) and NPV of 97.4% (95.3-98.6). PEGeD would have resulted in the most patients managed without imaging (35.4%), followed by YEARS (27.6%), age-adjusted (5.7%), and the conventional cutoff (3.1%).
Conclusion: While implementation of a probability-adjusted D-dimer pathway, such as YEARS or PEGeD, would have substantially reduced imaging utilization, these strategies may miss some cases of pulmonary embolism detectable by both age-adjusted and conventional cutoffs. We add to the heterogeneity of safety data, suggesting that adjustment of D-dimer to clinical probability represents a trade-off between sensitivity and imaging utilization.
{"title":"Evaluation of probability-adjusted D-dimer algorithms among patients imaged for pulmonary embolism in three Canadian emergency departments.","authors":"Logan Haynes, Travis Black, Philip J Davis, Taofiq Olusegun Oyedokun, Sachin V Trivedi","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-01026-w","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s43678-025-01026-w","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>D-dimer testing can reduce imaging utilization in the workup of pulmonary embolism, but the optimal cutoff remains unclear. The conventional D-dimer cutoff is < 500 µg/L Fibrinogen Equivalent Units, while the age-adjusted cutoff in patients over 50 is age × 10. Newer probability-adjusted strategies-the YEARS criteria and PEGeD algorithm-allow a higher threshold (D-dimer < 1000 µg/L) for select low-risk patients. We aimed to retrospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of four evidence-based pathways to exclude pulmonary embolism without imaging among our emergency department patients who were imaged.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A historical patient cohort was generated including all adults who received computed tomography pulmonary angiography or ventilation-perfusion scans after D-dimer testing in three emergency departments in a large urban Canadian center. Electronic medical records were reviewed to retrospectively compare the test performance of four D-dimer pathways: (i) conventional, (ii) age-adjusted, (iii) YEARS, and (iv) PEGeD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1092 patients, 129 had pulmonary embolism. Conventional and age-adjusted cutoffs were both 100% sensitive (95% CI, 97.1-100.0), with specificities of 3.5% (2.5-4.9) and 6.4% (5.1-8.2). YEARS was 93.8% sensitive (88.2-96.8) and 30.4% specific (27.6-33.4), with PPV of 15.3% (13.0-18.0) and NPV of 97.3% (94.8-98.6). PEGeD was the least sensitive (92.2%, 86.3-95.7), but most specific (39.1%, 36.1-42.3), with PPV of 16.9% (14.3-19.8) and NPV of 97.4% (95.3-98.6). PEGeD would have resulted in the most patients managed without imaging (35.4%), followed by YEARS (27.6%), age-adjusted (5.7%), and the conventional cutoff (3.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While implementation of a probability-adjusted D-dimer pathway, such as YEARS or PEGeD, would have substantially reduced imaging utilization, these strategies may miss some cases of pulmonary embolism detectable by both age-adjusted and conventional cutoffs. We add to the heterogeneity of safety data, suggesting that adjustment of D-dimer to clinical probability represents a trade-off between sensitivity and imaging utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"961-968"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145497876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1007/s43678-025-01027-9
{"title":"Abstracts from the 24th Annual International Conference on Emergency Medicine : 23-28 May, 2025; Montreal, Canada, Palais des congrès de Montréal.","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-01027-9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-01027-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":"27 Suppl 1","pages":"1-234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145776481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-23DOI: 10.1007/s43678-025-01028-8
Kerstin de Wit, Federico Germini
{"title":"D-dimer in the high risk patient: why taxonomy and mythology matter.","authors":"Kerstin de Wit, Federico Germini","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-01028-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s43678-025-01028-8","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"946-948"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145350513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-04DOI: 10.1007/s43678-025-01007-z
Ming K Li, Rohit Mohindra
{"title":"Need to Know: CJEM Journal Club-Does IV tenecteplase treatment before endovascular thrombectomy lead to improved functional outcomes than endovascular thrombectomy alone in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion?","authors":"Ming K Li, Rohit Mohindra","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-01007-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s43678-025-01007-z","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"957-958"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145226510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-25DOI: 10.1007/s43678-025-01008-y
Bertille Griveau, Mathilde Papin, Chloé Thibaud, Claire Mordant, Christophe Berranger, Emmanuel Montassier, Philippe L E Conte, Éric Batard, Quentin Le Bastard
Background and aim: Predicting the need for urgent urological care in Emergency Department (ED) patients with suspected renal colic remains challenging, with no validated strategy available at initial presentation. We aimed to develop a prediction model and a clinical score combining point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) and clinical findings to identify patients at low risk of requiring urgent urological care.
Methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective study between December 2022 and June 2023 in three French EDs. Adult patients with suspected uncomplicated acute renal colic underwent POCUS examination to assess hydronephrosis severity and identify potential complications. The primary outcome was urgent urological care within 30 days, defined as inhospital admission, urological procedure within 24 h after ED admission, or new ED admission within 30 days leading to urgent urological procedure within 24 h.
Results: Among 168 patients (mean 46.1 years old, 49% female), 25 (15%) required urgent urological care within 30 days, including 8 (5%) urgent decompressions after initial ED admission and 6 (4%) following new ED admission within 30 days. Three independent predictors were identified: age over 65 years (adjusted OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.4-9.9), moderate to severe hydronephrosis (adjusted OR, 4.8; 95% CI, 2.1-11.8) and persistent pain 4 h after analgesic administration (adjusted OR, 12.5; 95% CI, 4.6-35). The derived ECOLIC score (range, 0-6) showed that a score ≤ 1 was associated with a 98% negative predictive value for urgent urological care.
Conclusion: The ECOLIC score combines POCUS findings (absence of moderate/severe hydronephrosis), clinical features (age < 65 years), and treatment response (pain relief 4 h after analgesia) to identify patients at low risk of requiring urgent urological care at 30 days. This tool may help emergency physicians safely discharge low-risk patients without immediate CT imaging or urgent urological referral but require external validation before clinical implementation.
{"title":"Point-of-care ultrasound for risk stratification of urgent urological care in acute uncomplicated renal colic.","authors":"Bertille Griveau, Mathilde Papin, Chloé Thibaud, Claire Mordant, Christophe Berranger, Emmanuel Montassier, Philippe L E Conte, Éric Batard, Quentin Le Bastard","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-01008-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s43678-025-01008-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Predicting the need for urgent urological care in Emergency Department (ED) patients with suspected renal colic remains challenging, with no validated strategy available at initial presentation. We aimed to develop a prediction model and a clinical score combining point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) and clinical findings to identify patients at low risk of requiring urgent urological care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter prospective study between December 2022 and June 2023 in three French EDs. Adult patients with suspected uncomplicated acute renal colic underwent POCUS examination to assess hydronephrosis severity and identify potential complications. The primary outcome was urgent urological care within 30 days, defined as inhospital admission, urological procedure within 24 h after ED admission, or new ED admission within 30 days leading to urgent urological procedure within 24 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 168 patients (mean 46.1 years old, 49% female), 25 (15%) required urgent urological care within 30 days, including 8 (5%) urgent decompressions after initial ED admission and 6 (4%) following new ED admission within 30 days. Three independent predictors were identified: age over 65 years (adjusted OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.4-9.9), moderate to severe hydronephrosis (adjusted OR, 4.8; 95% CI, 2.1-11.8) and persistent pain 4 h after analgesic administration (adjusted OR, 12.5; 95% CI, 4.6-35). The derived ECOLIC score (range, 0-6) showed that a score ≤ 1 was associated with a 98% negative predictive value for urgent urological care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ECOLIC score combines POCUS findings (absence of moderate/severe hydronephrosis), clinical features (age < 65 years), and treatment response (pain relief 4 h after analgesia) to identify patients at low risk of requiring urgent urological care at 30 days. This tool may help emergency physicians safely discharge low-risk patients without immediate CT imaging or urgent urological referral but require external validation before clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"984-994"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145369102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-10-14DOI: 10.1007/s43678-025-01019-9
Jace C Bradshaw, Harry Lambert, Edana Mann
{"title":"Conservative management of glottic stenosis in the setting of psychogenic non-epileptiform seizures: a case report.","authors":"Jace C Bradshaw, Harry Lambert, Edana Mann","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-01019-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s43678-025-01019-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"1010-1012"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145294572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-06-23DOI: 10.1007/s43678-025-00953-y
Roy Khalife, Brit Long, Hans Rosenberg
{"title":"Just the facts: emergency department approach to vaso-occlusive episodes in sickle cell disease.","authors":"Roy Khalife, Brit Long, Hans Rosenberg","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-00953-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s43678-025-00953-y","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"952-956"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144478242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-07-26DOI: 10.1007/s43678-025-00995-2
Derek Lanoue, Adam Byrne, D Blair Macdonald, Ariel Hendin
{"title":"Just the facts: contrast allergy in the emergency department.","authors":"Derek Lanoue, Adam Byrne, D Blair Macdonald, Ariel Hendin","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-00995-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s43678-025-00995-2","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":"949-951"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144736073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}