首页 > 最新文献

Critical care explorations最新文献

英文 中文
Family-Partnered Delirium Care in the ICU: Feasible Today, Essential Tomorrow? ICU家庭合作谵妄护理:今天可行,明天必要?
IF 2.7 Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-09 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001318
Vanessa Vater, Peter Nydahl, Pam Ramsay
{"title":"Family-Partnered Delirium Care in the ICU: Feasible Today, Essential Tomorrow?","authors":"Vanessa Vater, Peter Nydahl, Pam Ramsay","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001318","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001318","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 9","pages":"e1318"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422771/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145031354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Monocyte Anisocytosis Can Discriminate Between Sepsis and Sterile Inflammation, but not Mortality, in Critically Ill Surgical/Trauma Patients: A Secondary Prospective Analysis. 在外科/创伤危重患者中,单核细胞异数可以区分败血症和无菌性炎症,但不能区分死亡率:一项次要的前瞻性分析。
IF 2.7 Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-09 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001309
Miguel Hernández-Ríos, Ruoxuan Wu, Valerie A Polcz, Rachel D Burnside, Lael M Yonker, Daniel Irimia, Feifei Xiao, Jaimar C Rincon, Tyler J Loftus, Lyle L Moldawer, Robert Maile, Philip A Efron, Muxuan Liang

Objectives background: Monocyte anisocytosis (monocyte distribution width [MDW]) has been previously validated to predict sepsis and outcome in patients presenting in the emergency department and mixed-population ICUs. Determining sepsis in a critically ill surgical/trauma population is often difficult due to concomitant inflammation and stress. We examined whether MDW could identify sepsis among patients admitted to a surgical/trauma ICU and predict clinical outcome.

Design: Secondary analysis of three prospective observational clinical studies.

Setting: Single institution ICU.

Patients/subjects: Two hundred thirty-eight participants were included in this study: 107 patients who were admitted to the ICU and adjudicated to have sepsis, 80 patients who were considered critically ill nonseptic (CINS), and 51 healthy control participants.

Interventions: MDW was measured among hospitalized patients admitted to the ICU with the diagnosis of sepsis or CINS patients at risk of developing sepsis. Blood samples were collected at admission and at intervals during ICU admission.

Measurements and main results: MDW significantly differed between septic and CINS patients on ICU admission (26.4, interquartile range [IQR, 23.5-30.8] vs. 20.1 [IQR, 17.9-21.9]; p < 0.001) and could discriminate with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.79-0.91; p < 0.001). An MDW of greater than 22.0 at admission to the ICU could identify sepsis with a 78% specificity and a 90% sensitivity but could not discriminate in-hospital, 30-day, or 90-day mortality.

Limitations: Small sample size from a single institution. Our analysis did not include other relevant biomarkers such as procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6. In the imputation of missing values, linear mixed-effect models were used, risking model misspecification and the violation of the missing-at-random assumption.

Conclusions: Among surgical/trauma ICU patients, MDW can discriminate between sepsis and nonseptic inflammation, but it is a weak predictor of mortality.

目的背景:单核细胞异数(单核细胞分布宽度[MDW])先前已被证实可以预测急诊科和混合人群icu患者的脓毒症和预后。由于伴随的炎症和应激,在危重外科/创伤人群中确定败血症通常是困难的。我们研究了MDW是否可以在外科/创伤ICU收治的患者中识别败血症并预测临床结果。设计:对三项前瞻性观察性临床研究进行二次分析。环境:单机构ICU。患者/受试者:本研究纳入了238名参与者:107名被诊断为脓毒症的ICU患者,80名被认为是重症非脓毒症(CINS)的患者,以及51名健康对照参与者。干预措施:在诊断为败血症的ICU住院患者或有发生败血症风险的CINS患者中测量MDW。在入院时和ICU住院期间每隔一段时间采集一次血样。测量结果及主要结果:脓毒症患者与CINS患者在ICU入院时的MDW差异显著(26.4,四分位数范围[IQR, 23.5-30.8] vs. 20.1 [IQR, 17.9-21.9], p < 0.001),可与受试者工作特征曲线下面积0.85区分(95% CI, 0.79-0.91, p < 0.001)。ICU入院时MDW大于22.0可以以78%的特异性和90%的敏感性识别脓毒症,但不能区分住院、30天或90天死亡率。局限性:来自单一机构的样本量小。我们的分析没有包括其他相关的生物标志物,如降钙素原、c反应蛋白和白细胞介素-6。在缺失值的imputation中,使用了线性混合效应模型,这有可能导致模型规格错误和违反missing-at-random假设。结论:在外科/创伤ICU患者中,MDW可以区分脓毒症和非脓毒症炎症,但它是死亡率的弱预测因子。
{"title":"Monocyte Anisocytosis Can Discriminate Between Sepsis and Sterile Inflammation, but not Mortality, in Critically Ill Surgical/Trauma Patients: A Secondary Prospective Analysis.","authors":"Miguel Hernández-Ríos, Ruoxuan Wu, Valerie A Polcz, Rachel D Burnside, Lael M Yonker, Daniel Irimia, Feifei Xiao, Jaimar C Rincon, Tyler J Loftus, Lyle L Moldawer, Robert Maile, Philip A Efron, Muxuan Liang","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001309","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001309","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives background: </strong>Monocyte anisocytosis (monocyte distribution width [MDW]) has been previously validated to predict sepsis and outcome in patients presenting in the emergency department and mixed-population ICUs. Determining sepsis in a critically ill surgical/trauma population is often difficult due to concomitant inflammation and stress. We examined whether MDW could identify sepsis among patients admitted to a surgical/trauma ICU and predict clinical outcome.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of three prospective observational clinical studies.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single institution ICU.</p><p><strong>Patients/subjects: </strong>Two hundred thirty-eight participants were included in this study: 107 patients who were admitted to the ICU and adjudicated to have sepsis, 80 patients who were considered critically ill nonseptic (CINS), and 51 healthy control participants.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>MDW was measured among hospitalized patients admitted to the ICU with the diagnosis of sepsis or CINS patients at risk of developing sepsis. Blood samples were collected at admission and at intervals during ICU admission.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>MDW significantly differed between septic and CINS patients on ICU admission (26.4, interquartile range [IQR, 23.5-30.8] vs. 20.1 [IQR, 17.9-21.9]; p < 0.001) and could discriminate with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.79-0.91; p < 0.001). An MDW of greater than 22.0 at admission to the ICU could identify sepsis with a 78% specificity and a 90% sensitivity but could not discriminate in-hospital, 30-day, or 90-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Small sample size from a single institution. Our analysis did not include other relevant biomarkers such as procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6. In the imputation of missing values, linear mixed-effect models were used, risking model misspecification and the violation of the missing-at-random assumption.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among surgical/trauma ICU patients, MDW can discriminate between sepsis and nonseptic inflammation, but it is a weak predictor of mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 9","pages":"e1309"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422779/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145031360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Immune Response Subphenotyping to Predict Mortality in Sepsis: A Prospective Study in Resource-Limited Setting. 免疫反应亚表型预测脓毒症死亡率:一项资源有限的前瞻性研究。
IF 2.7 Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-09 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001315
Velma Herwanto, Robert Sinto, Leonard Nainggolan, Adityo Susilo, Evy Yunihastuti, Ceva Wicaksono Pitoyo, Hamzah Shatri, Khie Chen Lie

Importance: Sepsis remains a leading cause of death in infectious cases. The heterogeneity of immune responses is a major challenge in the management and prognostication of patients with sepsis. Identifying distinct immune response subphenotypes using parsimonious classifiers may improve outcome prediction, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate whether classification of the immune response can serve as a predictor of mortality.

Design, setting, and participants: This prospective cohort study was conducted in the emergency department, inpatient wards, and ICU of a tertiary hospital. Adult patients diagnosed with sepsis within the previous 24 hours were included. Exclusion criteria were history of RBC transfusion, major thalassemia, decompensated cirrhosis, hematologic malignancy, or use of immunosuppressive or chronic corticosteroid therapy. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data-including serum ferritin and monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR/Human Leukocyte Antigen-DR) (mHLA-DR) levels-were collected.

Main outcomes and measures: Subjects were classified into the following immune subphenotypes: macrophage activation-like syndrome (MALS) (if ferritin > 4420 ng/mL), immunoparalysis (if mHLA-DR < 10,000 receptors/cell and ferritin ≤ 4420 ng/mL), and unclassified (if they did not meet the criteria for either MALS or immunoparalysis). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

Results: Of the 200 subjects recruited, 54 (27%) were classified into the MALS group, 19 (9.5%) into the immunoparalysis group, and the remainder into the unclassified group. The in-hospital mortality rates for the MALS, immune paralysis, and unclassified groups were 83.3%, 68.4%, and 51.1%, respectively. The proportional hazards assumption was met between the MALS and unclassified groups (crude hazard ratio [HR] 2.3; 95% CI, 1.56-3.35) but not between the immunoparalysis and unclassified groups (crude HR 1.4; 95% CI, 0.76-2.50). After adjusting for confounding variables, MALS's adjusted HR was 1.7 (95% CI, 1.13-2.49; p = 0.01).

Conclusions and relevance: The MALS subphenotype is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in sepsis.

重要性:败血症仍然是感染性病例死亡的主要原因。免疫反应的异质性是脓毒症患者管理和预后的主要挑战。使用简约分类器识别不同的免疫反应亚表型可以改善结果预测,特别是在资源有限的情况下。目的:本研究旨在评估免疫反应的分类是否可以作为死亡率的预测因子。设计、环境和参与者:本前瞻性队列研究在一家三级医院的急诊科、住院病房和ICU进行。在过去24小时内诊断为败血症的成年患者被纳入研究。排除标准为红细胞输注史、重度地中海贫血史、失代偿性肝硬化史、血液恶性肿瘤史、使用免疫抑制剂或慢性皮质类固醇治疗史。收集了人口统计学、临床和实验室数据,包括血清铁蛋白和单核细胞人白细胞抗原dr /人白细胞抗原dr (mHLA-DR)水平。主要结果和指标:受试者被分为以下免疫亚表型:巨噬细胞激活样综合征(MALS)(如果铁蛋白> 4420 ng/mL),免疫麻痹(如果mHLA-DR < 10,000受体/细胞,铁蛋白≤4420 ng/mL),和未分类(如果他们不符合MALS或免疫麻痹的标准)。主要终点是住院死亡率。结果:纳入的200例受试者中,MALS组54例(占27%),免疫麻痹组19例(占9.5%),其余为未分类组。MALS组、免疫麻痹组和未分类组的住院死亡率分别为83.3%、68.4%和51.1%。MALS组和未分类组之间符合比例风险假设(粗风险比[HR] 2.3; 95% CI, 1.56-3.35),但免疫麻痹组和未分类组之间不符合比例风险假设(粗风险比[HR] 1.4; 95% CI, 0.76-2.50)。校正混杂变量后,MALS的校正HR为1.7 (95% CI, 1.13-2.49; p = 0.01)。结论和相关性:MALS亚表型是脓毒症住院死亡率的独立预测因子。
{"title":"Immune Response Subphenotyping to Predict Mortality in Sepsis: A Prospective Study in Resource-Limited Setting.","authors":"Velma Herwanto, Robert Sinto, Leonard Nainggolan, Adityo Susilo, Evy Yunihastuti, Ceva Wicaksono Pitoyo, Hamzah Shatri, Khie Chen Lie","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001315","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001315","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Sepsis remains a leading cause of death in infectious cases. The heterogeneity of immune responses is a major challenge in the management and prognostication of patients with sepsis. Identifying distinct immune response subphenotypes using parsimonious classifiers may improve outcome prediction, particularly in resource-limited settings.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate whether classification of the immune response can serve as a predictor of mortality.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This prospective cohort study was conducted in the emergency department, inpatient wards, and ICU of a tertiary hospital. Adult patients diagnosed with sepsis within the previous 24 hours were included. Exclusion criteria were history of RBC transfusion, major thalassemia, decompensated cirrhosis, hematologic malignancy, or use of immunosuppressive or chronic corticosteroid therapy. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data-including serum ferritin and monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR/Human Leukocyte Antigen-DR) (mHLA-DR) levels-were collected.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Subjects were classified into the following immune subphenotypes: macrophage activation-like syndrome (MALS) (if ferritin > 4420 ng/mL), immunoparalysis (if mHLA-DR < 10,000 receptors/cell and ferritin ≤ 4420 ng/mL), and unclassified (if they did not meet the criteria for either MALS or immunoparalysis). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 200 subjects recruited, 54 (27%) were classified into the MALS group, 19 (9.5%) into the immunoparalysis group, and the remainder into the unclassified group. The in-hospital mortality rates for the MALS, immune paralysis, and unclassified groups were 83.3%, 68.4%, and 51.1%, respectively. The proportional hazards assumption was met between the MALS and unclassified groups (crude hazard ratio [HR] 2.3; 95% CI, 1.56-3.35) but not between the immunoparalysis and unclassified groups (crude HR 1.4; 95% CI, 0.76-2.50). After adjusting for confounding variables, MALS's adjusted HR was 1.7 (95% CI, 1.13-2.49; p = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The MALS subphenotype is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 9","pages":"e1315"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12422772/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145031332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Vitamin C Does Not Affect Platelet Counts in Patients With Sepsis: A Post hoc Analysis of the Lessening Organ Dysfunction With Vitamin C Randomized Trial. 维生素C不影响败血症患者的血小板计数:维生素C减轻器官功能障碍的随机试验的事后分析。
IF 2.7 Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-05 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001310
Mattia M Müller, Ruxandra Pinto, François Lamontagne, Neill K J Adhikari, Lorenzo Del Sorbo

Objective: Vitamin C has been linked to alterations in platelet count and aggregation behavior. Given recent findings suggesting an association between vitamin C and adverse outcomes in patients with septic shock, we aimed to investigate whether vitamin C influences mortality in septic patients through its impact on platelets.

Design: Post hoc analysis of the Lessening Organ Dysfunction With Vitamin C (LOVIT) randomized trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03680274).

Setting: Multicenter international study.

Patients: Patients were included with an ICU stay of more than 24 hours, confirmed or suspected infection, vasopressor requirement, and availability of platelet count data.

Intervention: Vitamin C (50 mg/kg body weight) every 6 hours for 4 days, or placebo.

Measurements and main results: Of the 863 patients enrolled in the LOVIT trial, 859 had available platelet count data at any time. Although the longitudinal trajectory of platelet count was significantly associated with 28-day mortality (hazard ratio 0.97 per 10 × 109/L increase, 95% CI, 0.96-0.98), there was no interaction between the effect of vitamin C on mortality and either platelet count at baseline or over time.

Conclusions: These results do not support the hypothesis that vitamin C administration increases mortality risk by affecting platelet count.

目的:维生素C与血小板计数和聚集行为的改变有关。鉴于最近的研究结果表明维生素C与感染性休克患者的不良结局之间存在关联,我们的目的是研究维生素C是否通过对血小板的影响影响感染性休克患者的死亡率。设计:维生素C减轻器官功能障碍(LOVIT)随机试验的事后分析(clinicaltrials.gov NCT03680274)。环境:多中心国际学习。患者:纳入ICU住院时间超过24小时、确诊或疑似感染、血管加压药物需求和血小板计数数据可用性的患者。干预:每6小时服用维生素C (50mg /kg体重),持续4天,或服用安慰剂。测量和主要结果:在参加LOVIT试验的863名患者中,859名患者在任何时候都有可用的血小板计数数据。虽然血小板计数的纵向轨迹与28天死亡率显著相关(风险比0.97 / 10 × 109/L增加,95% CI, 0.96-0.98),但维生素C对死亡率的影响与基线或随时间推移的血小板计数之间没有相互作用。结论:这些结果不支持维生素C通过影响血小板计数增加死亡风险的假设。
{"title":"Vitamin C Does Not Affect Platelet Counts in Patients With Sepsis: A Post hoc Analysis of the Lessening Organ Dysfunction With Vitamin C Randomized Trial.","authors":"Mattia M Müller, Ruxandra Pinto, François Lamontagne, Neill K J Adhikari, Lorenzo Del Sorbo","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001310","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001310","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Vitamin C has been linked to alterations in platelet count and aggregation behavior. Given recent findings suggesting an association between vitamin C and adverse outcomes in patients with septic shock, we aimed to investigate whether vitamin C influences mortality in septic patients through its impact on platelets.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Post hoc analysis of the Lessening Organ Dysfunction With Vitamin C (LOVIT) randomized trial (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03680274).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Multicenter international study.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients were included with an ICU stay of more than 24 hours, confirmed or suspected infection, vasopressor requirement, and availability of platelet count data.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Vitamin C (50 mg/kg body weight) every 6 hours for 4 days, or placebo.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Of the 863 patients enrolled in the LOVIT trial, 859 had available platelet count data at any time. Although the longitudinal trajectory of platelet count was significantly associated with 28-day mortality (hazard ratio 0.97 per 10 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L increase, 95% CI, 0.96-0.98), there was no interaction between the effect of vitamin C on mortality and either platelet count at baseline or over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results do not support the hypothesis that vitamin C administration increases mortality risk by affecting platelet count.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 9","pages":"e1310"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417011/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145031304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mean Airway Pressure-An Informative but Overlooked Indicator of Mechanical Power. 平均气道压力——一个有用但被忽视的机械动力指标。
IF 2.7 Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-05 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001305
Michael G Michalik, Philip S Crooke, John J Marini

Mean airway pressure, a monitored variable continuously available on the modern ventilator, is the pressure measured at the airway opening averaged over the time needed to complete the entire respiratory cycle. Mean airway pressure is well recognized to connect three key physiologic processes in mechanical ventilation: physical stretch, cardiovascular dynamics, and pulmonary gas exchange. Although other parameters currently employed in adults to determine "safe" ventilation are undoubtedly valuable for daily practice, all have limitations for continuous monitoring of ventilation hazard. The purpose of this communication is to explore the often-underappreciated link between mean airway pressure and the mechanical power (cumulative inflation energy/min) that helps determine the adverse consequences of invasive ventilation (ventilator-induced lung injury).

平均气道压力是在现代呼吸机上连续监测的变量,是在完成整个呼吸周期所需时间内,在气道开口处测量的平均压力。平均气道压力被公认为连接机械通气中的三个关键生理过程:物理拉伸、心血管动力学和肺气体交换。虽然目前用于成人确定“安全”通风的其他参数在日常实践中无疑是有价值的,但对于持续监测通风危害都有局限性。本文的目的是探讨平均气道压力和机械功率(累计充气能量/分钟)之间经常被低估的联系,这有助于确定有创通气的不良后果(呼吸机诱导的肺损伤)。
{"title":"Mean Airway Pressure-An Informative but Overlooked Indicator of Mechanical Power.","authors":"Michael G Michalik, Philip S Crooke, John J Marini","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001305","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001305","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mean airway pressure, a monitored variable continuously available on the modern ventilator, is the pressure measured at the airway opening averaged over the time needed to complete the entire respiratory cycle. Mean airway pressure is well recognized to connect three key physiologic processes in mechanical ventilation: physical stretch, cardiovascular dynamics, and pulmonary gas exchange. Although other parameters currently employed in adults to determine \"safe\" ventilation are undoubtedly valuable for daily practice, all have limitations for continuous monitoring of ventilation hazard. The purpose of this communication is to explore the often-underappreciated link between mean airway pressure and the mechanical power (cumulative inflation energy/min) that helps determine the adverse consequences of invasive ventilation (ventilator-induced lung injury).</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 9","pages":"e1305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145007006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hemodynamic Effects of Guideline-Based Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Adults: A Multicenter Observational Analysis. 基于指南的镇静对机械通气成人的血流动力学影响:一项多中心观察分析。
IF 2.7 Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-05 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001313
Kiyan Heybati, Guozhen Xie, Jiawen Deng, Allan J Walkey, Ognjen Gajic, Hemang Yadav

Importance: Propofol is a first-line sedative for adults receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). However, it can contribute to hemodynamic instability, especially during intubation. The magnitude, timing, risk factors, and variability of sedation-associated mean arterial pressure (MAP) changes remain poorly characterized in ICU settings.

Objectives: To quantify MAP changes following propofol sedation, identify risk factors for hemodynamic instability, and characterize associated interventions.

Design: Retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was MAP change within 2 hours following sedation. Secondary outcomes included vasopressor use and hypotension (MAP ≤ 60 mm Hg). Mixed-effects modeling was used to account for individual patient differences.

Setting and participants: Adults (≥ 18 yrs old) who required IMV and received greater than or equal to 6 consecutive hours of propofol infusion, between May 5th, 2018, and July 31st, 2024, in 11 ICUs across the Mayo Clinic, spanning 5 hospitals in 4 states.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the change in MAP within 2 hours following the initiation of propofol-based sedation.

Results: Across 16,418 patients, 25.2% were on vasopressors before sedation initiation. Among the remaining 12,281 patients, 40.3% required vasopressors and 7.7% experienced hypotension within 2 hours of sedation. Propofol-based sedation was associated with a MAP reduction within the first 30 minutes (-6.58 mm Hg; 95% CI, -6.85 to -6.32; p < 0.001). There was substantial interpatient variability in both baseline MAP, and MAP decline after sedation (9.5 and 40.9% between-patient differences, respectively). Higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores (-0.31 mm Hg/point), older age (-0.04 mm Hg/yr), and male sex (-0.47 mm Hg) were associated with lower MAP. Patients with higher illness severity experienced progressively greater MAP decline over time (-0.20 mm Hg/hr/SOFA point; p < 0.001).

Conclusions and relevance: Propofol-based sedation was associated with clinically significant hemodynamic effects requiring intervention in the early post-intubation period. The marked interpatient variability in hemodynamic responses highlights the importance of personalized management approaches, including risk stratification based on age, sex, and illness severity.

重要性:异丙酚是接受有创机械通气(IMV)的成人的一线镇静剂。然而,它可能导致血流动力学不稳定,特别是在插管期间。在ICU环境中,镇静相关的平均动脉压(MAP)变化的幅度、时间、危险因素和可变性仍然缺乏特征。目的:量化异丙酚镇静后MAP的变化,确定血流动力学不稳定的危险因素,并确定相关干预措施的特征。设计:回顾性队列研究。主要终点是镇静后2小时内MAP的变化。次要结局包括使用血管加压剂和低血压(MAP≤60 mm Hg)。混合效应模型用于解释个体患者的差异。环境和参与者:2018年5月5日至2024年7月31日期间,在梅奥诊所横跨4个州5家医院的11个icu中,需要IMV并接受大于或等于连续6小时异丙酚输注的成年人(≥18岁)。主要结局和指标:主要结局为异丙酚镇静开始后2小时内MAP的变化。结果:在16,418例患者中,25.2%的患者在镇静开始前使用血管加压药物。在剩余的12281例患者中,40.3%需要血管加压药物,7.7%在镇静2小时内出现低血压。基于异丙酚的镇静与前30分钟内MAP降低相关(-6.58 mm Hg; 95% CI, -6.85至-6.32;p < 0.001)。镇静后基线MAP和MAP下降的患者间差异很大(患者间差异分别为9.5%和40.9%)。较高的顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分(-0.31 mm Hg/分)、年龄(-0.04 mm Hg/年)和男性(-0.47 mm Hg)与较低的MAP相关。随着时间的推移,病情严重程度越高的患者MAP下降越严重(-0.20 mm Hg/hr/SOFA点;p < 0.001)。结论及相关性:异丙酚镇静与临床显著的血流动力学影响相关,需要在插管后早期进行干预。患者血流动力学反应的显著差异突出了个性化管理方法的重要性,包括基于年龄、性别和疾病严重程度的风险分层。
{"title":"Hemodynamic Effects of Guideline-Based Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Adults: A Multicenter Observational Analysis.","authors":"Kiyan Heybati, Guozhen Xie, Jiawen Deng, Allan J Walkey, Ognjen Gajic, Hemang Yadav","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001313","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001313","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Propofol is a first-line sedative for adults receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). However, it can contribute to hemodynamic instability, especially during intubation. The magnitude, timing, risk factors, and variability of sedation-associated mean arterial pressure (MAP) changes remain poorly characterized in ICU settings.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To quantify MAP changes following propofol sedation, identify risk factors for hemodynamic instability, and characterize associated interventions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was MAP change within 2 hours following sedation. Secondary outcomes included vasopressor use and hypotension (MAP ≤ 60 mm Hg). Mixed-effects modeling was used to account for individual patient differences.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Adults (≥ 18 yrs old) who required IMV and received greater than or equal to 6 consecutive hours of propofol infusion, between May 5th, 2018, and July 31st, 2024, in 11 ICUs across the Mayo Clinic, spanning 5 hospitals in 4 states.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the change in MAP within 2 hours following the initiation of propofol-based sedation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 16,418 patients, 25.2% were on vasopressors before sedation initiation. Among the remaining 12,281 patients, 40.3% required vasopressors and 7.7% experienced hypotension within 2 hours of sedation. Propofol-based sedation was associated with a MAP reduction within the first 30 minutes (-6.58 mm Hg; 95% CI, -6.85 to -6.32; p < 0.001). There was substantial interpatient variability in both baseline MAP, and MAP decline after sedation (9.5 and 40.9% between-patient differences, respectively). Higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores (-0.31 mm Hg/point), older age (-0.04 mm Hg/yr), and male sex (-0.47 mm Hg) were associated with lower MAP. Patients with higher illness severity experienced progressively greater MAP decline over time (-0.20 mm Hg/hr/SOFA point; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Propofol-based sedation was associated with clinically significant hemodynamic effects requiring intervention in the early post-intubation period. The marked interpatient variability in hemodynamic responses highlights the importance of personalized management approaches, including risk stratification based on age, sex, and illness severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 9","pages":"e1313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416995/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145006916","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mean Airway Pressure-An Informative but Overlooked Indicator of Mechanical Power. 平均气道压力——一个有用但被忽视的机械动力指标。
IF 2.7 Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-05 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001305
Michael G Michalik, Philip S Crooke, John J Marini

Mean airway pressure, a monitored variable continuously available on the modern ventilator, is the pressure measured at the airway opening averaged over the time needed to complete the entire respiratory cycle. Mean airway pressure is well recognized to connect three key physiologic processes in mechanical ventilation: physical stretch, cardiovascular dynamics, and pulmonary gas exchange. Although other parameters currently employed in adults to determine "safe" ventilation are undoubtedly valuable for daily practice, all have limitations for continuous monitoring of ventilation hazard. The purpose of this communication is to explore the often-underappreciated link between mean airway pressure and the mechanical power (cumulative inflation energy/min) that helps determine the adverse consequences of invasive ventilation (ventilator-induced lung injury).

平均气道压力是在现代呼吸机上连续监测的变量,是在完成整个呼吸周期所需时间内,在气道开口处测量的平均压力。平均气道压力被公认为连接机械通气中的三个关键生理过程:物理拉伸、心血管动力学和肺气体交换。虽然目前用于成人确定“安全”通风的其他参数在日常实践中无疑是有价值的,但对于持续监测通风危害都有局限性。本文的目的是探讨平均气道压力和机械功率(累计充气能量/分钟)之间经常被低估的联系,这有助于确定有创通气的不良后果(呼吸机诱导的肺损伤)。
{"title":"Mean Airway Pressure-An Informative but Overlooked Indicator of Mechanical Power.","authors":"Michael G Michalik, Philip S Crooke, John J Marini","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001305","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001305","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mean airway pressure, a monitored variable continuously available on the modern ventilator, is the pressure measured at the airway opening averaged over the time needed to complete the entire respiratory cycle. Mean airway pressure is well recognized to connect three key physiologic processes in mechanical ventilation: physical stretch, cardiovascular dynamics, and pulmonary gas exchange. Although other parameters currently employed in adults to determine \"safe\" ventilation are undoubtedly valuable for daily practice, all have limitations for continuous monitoring of ventilation hazard. The purpose of this communication is to explore the often-underappreciated link between mean airway pressure and the mechanical power (cumulative inflation energy/min) that helps determine the adverse consequences of invasive ventilation (ventilator-induced lung injury).</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 9","pages":"e1305"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12416999/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145031368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Phenotypes After Stem Cell Transplantation: A Latent Class Analysis. 干细胞移植后急性呼吸窘迫综合征表型:一个潜在类别分析。
IF 2.7 Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-05 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001312
Svetlana Herasevich, Kiyan Heybati, William J Hogan, Mehrdad Hefazi, Hassan B Alkhateeb, Zhenmei Zhang, Kelly M Pennington, Ognjen Gajic, Carolyn Calfee, Hemang Yadav

Objective: To identify distinct phenotypes of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) developing after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), using routinely available clinical data at ICU admission.

Design: Multicenter retrospective cohort study using latent class analysis.

Setting: ICUs across three Mayo Clinic campuses (Minnesota, Florida, and Arizona).

Patients: A total of 166 adult patients who developed ARDS within 120 days following HCT (96 allogeneic, 70 autologous).

Intervention: None.

Measurements and main results: Model selection was based on multiple metrics including Bayesian information criteria, entropy, and Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin Likelihood Ratio testing. A two-class model optimally described the cohort. Class 1 (n = 81) was characterized by worse hypoxemia (P/F ratio 157 vs. 210, p = 0.002), higher Pco2 (41 vs. 36 mm Hg, p < 0.001), and higher bilirubin (1.4 vs. 0.9 mg/dL, p < 0.001) compared with class 2 (n = 85). Both classes included a mix of transplant types, transcending a simple autologous/allogeneic dichotomy, although class 1 had more allogeneic recipients (70.4% vs. 45.9%, p = 0.001). Although time-from-transplant was not a class-defining variable, class 1 occurred later after transplant (30.0 vs. 11.9 d, p < 0.001) with higher frequency of idiopathic pneumonia syndrome (14.8% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.004). Class 2 had more frequent neutropenia (leukocytes 0.4 vs. 5.9 × 109, p < 0.001) and higher frequency of peri-engraftment respiratory distress syndrome (29.4% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.005). Outcomes were significantly worse for class 1 (90-d mortality: 72.8% vs. 48.2%, p = 0.001). An exploratory parsimonious model had good classification accuracy (0.90) using just six variables: leukocyte count, platelet count, bilirubin, Pco2, body mass index, and temperature.

Conclusions: ARDS after HCT comprises two distinct phenotypes with distinct clinical characteristics and outcomes. These phenotypes align with recognized post-HCT lung injury syndromes and may reflect different underlying biological processes. This framework provides a foundation for investigating targeted therapeutic approaches.

目的:利用ICU入院时的常规临床资料,识别造血细胞移植(HCT)后发生的急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的不同表型。设计:采用潜在分类分析的多中心回顾性队列研究。环境:梅奥诊所三个校区(明尼苏达州、佛罗里达州和亚利桑那州)的icu。患者:共有166例成人患者在HCT后120天内发生ARDS(96例异体,70例自体)。干预:没有。测量和主要结果:模型选择基于多个指标,包括贝叶斯信息标准、熵和Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin似然比检验。两类模型最优地描述了队列。1级(n = 81)与2级(n = 85)相比,低氧血症更严重(P/F比157对210,P = 0.002),二氧化碳分压更高(41对36 mm Hg, P < 0.001),胆红素更高(1.4对0.9 mg/dL, P < 0.001)。这两种类型都包括移植类型的混合,超越了简单的自体/异体二分类,尽管1类有更多的异体受体(70.4% vs. 45.9%, p = 0.001)。虽然从移植开始的时间不是分类定义变量,但1级发生在移植后较晚(30.0天对11.9天,p < 0.001),特发性肺炎综合征的发生率较高(14.8%对2.4%,p = 0.004)。2类患者中性粒细胞减少发生率较高(白细胞0.4比5.9 × 109, p < 0.001),种植体周围呼吸窘迫综合征发生率较高(29.4%比9.9%,p = 0.005)。1级患者的预后明显更差(90天死亡率:72.8% vs. 48.2%, p = 0.001)。探索性简约模型仅使用6个变量:白细胞计数、血小板计数、胆红素、二氧化碳分压、体重指数和温度,分类精度为0.90。结论:HCT后ARDS包括两种不同的表型,具有不同的临床特征和结局。这些表型与公认的hct后肺损伤综合征一致,可能反映了不同的潜在生物学过程。该框架为研究靶向治疗方法提供了基础。
{"title":"Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Phenotypes After Stem Cell Transplantation: A Latent Class Analysis.","authors":"Svetlana Herasevich, Kiyan Heybati, William J Hogan, Mehrdad Hefazi, Hassan B Alkhateeb, Zhenmei Zhang, Kelly M Pennington, Ognjen Gajic, Carolyn Calfee, Hemang Yadav","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001312","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001312","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify distinct phenotypes of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) developing after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), using routinely available clinical data at ICU admission.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter retrospective cohort study using latent class analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>ICUs across three Mayo Clinic campuses (Minnesota, Florida, and Arizona).</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 166 adult patients who developed ARDS within 120 days following HCT (96 allogeneic, 70 autologous).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Model selection was based on multiple metrics including Bayesian information criteria, entropy, and Vuong-Lo-Mendell-Rubin Likelihood Ratio testing. A two-class model optimally described the cohort. Class 1 (n = 81) was characterized by worse hypoxemia (P/F ratio 157 vs. 210, p = 0.002), higher Pco2 (41 vs. 36 mm Hg, p < 0.001), and higher bilirubin (1.4 vs. 0.9 mg/dL, p < 0.001) compared with class 2 (n = 85). Both classes included a mix of transplant types, transcending a simple autologous/allogeneic dichotomy, although class 1 had more allogeneic recipients (70.4% vs. 45.9%, p = 0.001). Although time-from-transplant was not a class-defining variable, class 1 occurred later after transplant (30.0 vs. 11.9 d, p < 0.001) with higher frequency of idiopathic pneumonia syndrome (14.8% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.004). Class 2 had more frequent neutropenia (leukocytes 0.4 vs. 5.9 × 109, p < 0.001) and higher frequency of peri-engraftment respiratory distress syndrome (29.4% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.005). Outcomes were significantly worse for class 1 (90-d mortality: 72.8% vs. 48.2%, p = 0.001). An exploratory parsimonious model had good classification accuracy (0.90) using just six variables: leukocyte count, platelet count, bilirubin, Pco2, body mass index, and temperature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ARDS after HCT comprises two distinct phenotypes with distinct clinical characteristics and outcomes. These phenotypes align with recognized post-HCT lung injury syndromes and may reflect different underlying biological processes. This framework provides a foundation for investigating targeted therapeutic approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 9","pages":"e1312"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417010/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145006978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Progesterone for Traumatic Brain Injury, Experimental Clinical Treatment III Trial Revisited: Objective Classification of Traumatic Brain Injury With Brain Imaging Segmentation and Biomarker Levels. 黄体酮在创伤性脑损伤中的应用,实验临床治疗ⅲ:再谈:脑成像分割和生物标志物水平对创伤性脑损伤的客观分类。
IF 2.7 Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-05 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001306
Scarlett Cheong, Rishabh Gupta, Sharada Kadaba Sridhar, Alex J Hall, Michael Frankel, David W Wright, Yuk Y Sham, Uzma Samadani

Objective: This post hoc study of the Progesterone for Traumatic Brain Injury, Experimental Clinical Treatment (ProTECT) III trial investigates whether improving traumatic brain injury (TBI) classification, using serum biomarkers (glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP] and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal esterase L1 [UCH-L1]) and algorithmically assessed total lesion volume, could identify a subset of responders to progesterone treatment, beyond broad measures like the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E), which may fail to capture subtle changes in TBI recovery.

Design: Brain lesion volumes on CT scans were quantified using Brain Lesion Analysis and Segmentation Tool for CT. Patients were classified into true-positive and true-negative groups based on an optimization scheme to determine a threshold that maximizes agreement between radiological assessment and objectively measured lesion volume. True-positives were further categorized into low (> 0.2-10 mL), medium (> 10-50 mL), and high (> 50 mL) lesion volumes for analysis with protein biomarkers and injury severity. Correlation analyses linked Rotterdam scores (RSs) with biomarker levels and lesion volumes, whereas Welch's t-test evaluated biomarker differences between groups and progesterone's effects.

Setting: Forty-nine level 1 trauma centers in the United States.

Patient: Patients with moderate-to-severe TBI.

Interventions: Progesterone.

Measurements and main results: GFAP and UCH-L1 levels were significantly higher in true-positive cases with low to medium lesion volume. Only UCH-L1 differed between progesterone and placebo groups at 48 hours. Both biomarkers and lesion volume in the true-positive group correlated with the RS. No sex-specific or treatment differences were found.

Conclusions: This study reaffirms elevated levels of GFAP and UCH-L1 as biomarkers for detecting TBI in patients with brain lesions and for predicting clinical outcomes. Despite improved classification using CT-imaging segmentation and serum biomarkers, we did not identify a subset of progesterone responders within 24 or 48 hours of progesterone treatment. More rigorous and quantifiable measures for classifying the nature of injury may be needed to enable development of therapeutics as neither serum markers nor algorithmic CT analysis performed better than the older metrics of Rotterdam or GCS metrics.

摘要目的:黄体酮对创伤性脑损伤的事后研究,实验临床治疗(ProTECT) III试验研究了改善创伤性脑损伤(TBI)分类,使用血清生物标志物(胶质纤维酸性蛋白[GFAP]和泛素羧基末端酯酶L1 [UCH-L1])和算法评估的总病变体积,是否可以识别对黄体酮治疗有反应的亚群。超出了格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)和格拉斯哥结局扩展量表(GOS-E)等广泛的测量方法,这些方法可能无法捕捉到TBI恢复的细微变化。设计:使用CT脑病变分析和分割工具对CT扫描上的脑病变体积进行量化。根据优化方案将患者分为真阳性组和真阴性组,以确定一个阈值,使放射学评估与客观测量的病变体积之间的一致性最大化。真阳性进一步分为低(> 0.2-10 mL)、中(> 10-50 mL)和高(> 50 mL)病变体积,用于蛋白质生物标志物和损伤严重程度的分析。相关分析将鹿特丹评分(RSs)与生物标志物水平和病变体积联系起来,而韦尔奇t检验评估了组间生物标志物差异和黄体酮的作用。环境:美国有49个一级创伤中心。患者:中重度脑外伤患者。干预措施:孕激素。测量和主要结果:GFAP和UCH-L1水平在病变体积低至中等的真阳性病例中显著升高。孕酮组和安慰剂组在48小时时只有UCH-L1不同。真阳性组的生物标志物和病变体积与RS相关,没有发现性别特异性或治疗差异。结论:本研究重申GFAP和UCH-L1水平升高是检测脑损伤患者TBI和预测临床结果的生物标志物。尽管使用ct成像分割和血清生物标志物改进了分类,但我们没有在黄体酮治疗24或48小时内确定黄体酮应答的子集。可能需要更严格和可量化的措施来分类损伤的性质,以促进治疗方法的发展,因为血清标志物和算法CT分析都没有比旧的鹿特丹指标或GCS指标表现更好。
{"title":"Progesterone for Traumatic Brain Injury, Experimental Clinical Treatment III Trial Revisited: Objective Classification of Traumatic Brain Injury With Brain Imaging Segmentation and Biomarker Levels.","authors":"Scarlett Cheong, Rishabh Gupta, Sharada Kadaba Sridhar, Alex J Hall, Michael Frankel, David W Wright, Yuk Y Sham, Uzma Samadani","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001306","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001306","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This post hoc study of the Progesterone for Traumatic Brain Injury, Experimental Clinical Treatment (ProTECT) III trial investigates whether improving traumatic brain injury (TBI) classification, using serum biomarkers (glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP] and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal esterase L1 [UCH-L1]) and algorithmically assessed total lesion volume, could identify a subset of responders to progesterone treatment, beyond broad measures like the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E), which may fail to capture subtle changes in TBI recovery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Brain lesion volumes on CT scans were quantified using Brain Lesion Analysis and Segmentation Tool for CT. Patients were classified into true-positive and true-negative groups based on an optimization scheme to determine a threshold that maximizes agreement between radiological assessment and objectively measured lesion volume. True-positives were further categorized into low (> 0.2-10 mL), medium (> 10-50 mL), and high (> 50 mL) lesion volumes for analysis with protein biomarkers and injury severity. Correlation analyses linked Rotterdam scores (RSs) with biomarker levels and lesion volumes, whereas Welch's t-test evaluated biomarker differences between groups and progesterone's effects.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Forty-nine level 1 trauma centers in the United States.</p><p><strong>Patient: </strong>Patients with moderate-to-severe TBI.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Progesterone.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>GFAP and UCH-L1 levels were significantly higher in true-positive cases with low to medium lesion volume. Only UCH-L1 differed between progesterone and placebo groups at 48 hours. Both biomarkers and lesion volume in the true-positive group correlated with the RS. No sex-specific or treatment differences were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reaffirms elevated levels of GFAP and UCH-L1 as biomarkers for detecting TBI in patients with brain lesions and for predicting clinical outcomes. Despite improved classification using CT-imaging segmentation and serum biomarkers, we did not identify a subset of progesterone responders within 24 or 48 hours of progesterone treatment. More rigorous and quantifiable measures for classifying the nature of injury may be needed to enable development of therapeutics as neither serum markers nor algorithmic CT analysis performed better than the older metrics of Rotterdam or GCS metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 9","pages":"e1306"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12417008/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145006988","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Organ Failure, Endotoxin Activity, and Mortality in Septic Shock. 感染性休克的器官衰竭、内毒素活性和死亡率。
IF 2.7 Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-28 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001308
Luca Molinari, Mark A Tidswell, Ali Al-Khafaji, Danielle Davison, Claude Galphin, Esha Kamaluddin, Debra M Foster, John A Kellum

Importance: The relationship between endotoxin activity, organ failure, and mortality is not well understood.

Objective: To test whether the combination of endotoxin activity and organ failure identifies patients at higher risk of death from sepsis and determine the relationship to previously described sepsis phenotypes.

Design, setting, and participants: Prospective observational study in four ICUs enrolling critically ill patients with septic shock.

Main outcomes and measures: Endotoxin activity assay (EAA) results, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and multiple organ dysfunction (MODS) and 28-day mortality.

Results: We enrolled 90 patients aged 25-95 years and set an EAA cutoff of greater than or equal to 0.6 together with SOFA greater than 11 or MODS greater than 9 to define endotoxic septic shock (ESS). At baseline mean EAA was 0.64 (sd = 0.19), whereas mean SOFA and MODS were 10.3 (sd 3.2) and 5.8 (sd 3.1), respectively. EAA greater than or equal to 0.6 and SOFA greater than 11 were present in 20 patients (23.3%) and these patients had 60% mortality. EAA greater than or equal to 0.6 and SOFA less than or equal to 11 occurred in 31 (36.0%) with mortality 12.9%. Of the 35 remaining patients with EAA less than 0.6, 29 (33.7%) had SOFA less than or equal to 11 and 5 of them (17.2%) died. Only six patients (7.0%) had EAA less than 0.6 and SOFA greater than 11 and none died (p < 0.001). All patients with MODS greater than 9 also had EAA greater than or equal to 0.6 (12 patients) with 75% mortality. EAA greater than or equal to 0.6 with MODS less than or equal to 9 occurred in 39 patients with 17.9% mortality (p < 0.001). ESS (EAA ≥ 0.6 together with SOFA > 11 or MODS > 9) occurred in 21 patients and they had significantly higher mortality (57.1% vs. 15.9%, p < 0.001) compared with non-ESS, with a relative risk for death of 3.58 (95% CI, 1.86-6.91). Among ESS patients, 7 (33.3%) had δ phenotype, whereas only 4 (5.8%) had δ among non-ESS (p = 0.001).

Conclusions and relevance: ESS compromises patients with the highest mortality rate from sepsis. Such patients are most appropriate for trials testing anti-endotoxin therapy for improving survival.

重要性:内毒素活性、器官衰竭和死亡率之间的关系尚不清楚。目的:测试内毒素活性和器官衰竭的结合是否能识别脓毒症死亡风险较高的患者,并确定其与先前描述的脓毒症表型的关系。设计、环境和参与者:在4个icu中纳入脓毒性休克危重患者的前瞻性观察研究。主要结局和指标:内毒素活性测定(EAA)结果、顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、多器官功能障碍(MODS)和28天死亡率。结果:我们纳入了90例年龄在25-95岁之间的患者,设定EAA≥0.6、SOFA≥11或MODS≥9的临界值来定义内毒素感染性休克(ESS)。基线时平均EAA为0.64 (sd = 0.19),而平均SOFA和MODS分别为10.3 (sd 3.2)和5.8 (sd 3.1)。EAA≥0.6、SOFA≥11的患者20例(23.3%),死亡率为60%。EAA大于等于0.6,SOFA小于等于11者31例(36.0%),死亡率12.9%。其余35例EAA < 0.6的患者中,SOFA≤11者29例(33.7%),死亡5例(17.2%)。只有6例(7.0%)患者EAA小于0.6,SOFA大于11,无死亡(p < 0.001)。所有MODS大于9的患者EAA也大于或等于0.6(12例),死亡率为75%。39例EAA大于等于0.6,MODS小于等于9,死亡率为17.9% (p < 0.001)。21例患者发生ESS (EAA≥0.6,并合并SOFA > 11或MODS > 9),与非ESS患者相比,其死亡率明显更高(57.1% vs. 15.9%, p < 0.001),相对死亡风险为3.58 (95% CI, 1.86-6.91)。ESS患者中有7人(33.3%)具有δ表型,而非ESS患者中只有4人(5.8%)具有δ表型(p = 0.001)。结论和相关性:ESS危及败血症死亡率最高的患者。这类患者最适合进行抗内毒素治疗以提高生存率的试验。
{"title":"Organ Failure, Endotoxin Activity, and Mortality in Septic Shock.","authors":"Luca Molinari, Mark A Tidswell, Ali Al-Khafaji, Danielle Davison, Claude Galphin, Esha Kamaluddin, Debra M Foster, John A Kellum","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001308","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001308","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The relationship between endotoxin activity, organ failure, and mortality is not well understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test whether the combination of endotoxin activity and organ failure identifies patients at higher risk of death from sepsis and determine the relationship to previously described sepsis phenotypes.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Prospective observational study in four ICUs enrolling critically ill patients with septic shock.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Endotoxin activity assay (EAA) results, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and multiple organ dysfunction (MODS) and 28-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 90 patients aged 25-95 years and set an EAA cutoff of greater than or equal to 0.6 together with SOFA greater than 11 or MODS greater than 9 to define endotoxic septic shock (ESS). At baseline mean EAA was 0.64 (sd = 0.19), whereas mean SOFA and MODS were 10.3 (sd 3.2) and 5.8 (sd 3.1), respectively. EAA greater than or equal to 0.6 and SOFA greater than 11 were present in 20 patients (23.3%) and these patients had 60% mortality. EAA greater than or equal to 0.6 and SOFA less than or equal to 11 occurred in 31 (36.0%) with mortality 12.9%. Of the 35 remaining patients with EAA less than 0.6, 29 (33.7%) had SOFA less than or equal to 11 and 5 of them (17.2%) died. Only six patients (7.0%) had EAA less than 0.6 and SOFA greater than 11 and none died (p < 0.001). All patients with MODS greater than 9 also had EAA greater than or equal to 0.6 (12 patients) with 75% mortality. EAA greater than or equal to 0.6 with MODS less than or equal to 9 occurred in 39 patients with 17.9% mortality (p < 0.001). ESS (EAA ≥ 0.6 together with SOFA > 11 or MODS > 9) occurred in 21 patients and they had significantly higher mortality (57.1% vs. 15.9%, p < 0.001) compared with non-ESS, with a relative risk for death of 3.58 (95% CI, 1.86-6.91). Among ESS patients, 7 (33.3%) had δ phenotype, whereas only 4 (5.8%) had δ among non-ESS (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>ESS compromises patients with the highest mortality rate from sepsis. Such patients are most appropriate for trials testing anti-endotoxin therapy for improving survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"7 9","pages":"e1308"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398369/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144982483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Critical care explorations
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1