首页 > 最新文献

Critical care explorations最新文献

英文 中文
Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Patients Suffering Cardiogenic Shock. 肝素诱导的心源性休克患者血小板减少症。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-22 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001117
Enzo Lüsebrink, Hugo Lanz, Leonhard Binzenhöfer, Sabine Hoffmann, Julia Höpler, Marie Kraft, Nils Gade, Jonas Gmeiner, Daniel Roden, Inas Saleh, Christian Hagl, Georg Nickenig, Steffen Massberg, Sebastian Zimmer, Raúl Nicolás Jamin, Clemens Scherer

Objectives: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with high mortality. Patients treated for CS mostly require heparin therapy, which may be associated with complications such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT represents a serious condition associated with platelet decline and increased hypercoagulability and remains a poorly researched field in intensive care medicine. Primary purpose of this study was to: 1) determine HIT prevalence in CS, 2) assess the performance of common diagnostic tests for the workup of HIT, and 3) compare outcomes in CS patients with excluded and confirmed HIT.

Design: Retrospective dual-center study including adult patients 18 years old or older with diagnosed CS and suspected HIT from January 2010 to November 2022.

Setting: Cardiac ICU at the Ludwig-Maximilians University hospital in Munich and the university hospital of Bonn.

Patients and interventions: In this retrospective analysis, adult patients with diagnosed CS and suspected HIT were included. Differences in baseline characteristics, mortality, neurologic and safety outcomes between patients with excluded and confirmed HIT were evaluated.

Measurements and main results: In cases of suspected HIT, positive screening antibodies were detected in 159 of 2808 patients (5.7%). HIT was confirmed via positive functional assay in 57 of 2808 patients, corresponding to a prevalence rate of 2.0%. The positive predictive value for anti-platelet factor 4/heparin screening antibodies was 35.8%. Total in-hospital mortality (58.8% vs. 57.9%; p > 0.999), 1-month mortality (47.1% vs. 43.9%; p = 0.781), and 12-month mortality (58.8% vs. 59.6%; p > 0.999) were similar between patients with excluded and confirmed HIT, respectively. Furthermore, no significant difference in neurologic outcome among survivors was found between groups (Cerebral Performance Category [CPC] score 1: 8.8% vs. 8.8%; p > 0.999 and CPC 2: 7.8% vs. 12.3%; p = 0.485).

Conclusions: HIT was a rare complication in CS patients treated with unfractionated heparin and was not associated with increased mortality. Also, HIT confirmation was not associated with worse neurologic outcome in survivors. Future studies should aim at developing more precise, standardized, and cost-effective strategies to diagnose HIT and prevent complications.

目的:心源性休克(CS)死亡率很高。治疗心源性休克的患者大多需要肝素治疗,而肝素治疗可能会引起肝素诱导血小板减少症(HIT)等并发症。HIT 是一种与血小板减少和高凝状态增加有关的严重病症,在重症监护医学领域仍是一个研究较少的领域。本研究的主要目的是1)确定 HIT 在重症监护中的发病率;2)评估用于 HIT 检查的常用诊断测试的性能;3)比较排除和确诊 HIT 的重症监护患者的预后:设计:回顾性双中心研究,包括2010年1月至2022年11月期间确诊为CS和疑似HIT的18岁或18岁以上成年患者:慕尼黑路德维希-马克西米利安大学医院和波恩大学医院心脏重症监护室:在这项回顾性分析中,纳入了确诊为CS和疑似HIT的成年患者。评估了排除 HIT 和确诊 HIT 患者在基线特征、死亡率、神经系统和安全结果方面的差异:在疑似 HIT 患者中,2808 例患者中有 159 例(5.7%)检测到阳性筛查抗体。在 2808 例患者中,有 57 例通过阳性功能测试确诊为 HIT,患病率为 2.0%。抗血小板因子 4/肝素筛查抗体的阳性预测值为 35.8%。排除型和确诊型 HIT 患者的院内总死亡率(58.8% 对 57.9%;P > 0.999)、1 个月死亡率(47.1% 对 43.9%;P = 0.781)和 12 个月死亡率(58.8% 对 59.6%;P > 0.999)分别相似。此外,各组幸存者的神经系统预后无明显差异(脑功能分类 [CPC] 评分 1:8.8% 对 8.8%;P > 0.999;CPC 评分 2:7.8% 对 12.3%;P = 0.485):HIT是接受非分叶肝素治疗的CS患者中罕见的并发症,与死亡率的增加无关。此外,HIT的确认与幸存者神经系统预后的恶化无关。未来的研究应致力于开发更精确、更标准化、更具成本效益的策略来诊断 HIT 并预防并发症。
{"title":"Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Patients Suffering Cardiogenic Shock.","authors":"Enzo Lüsebrink, Hugo Lanz, Leonhard Binzenhöfer, Sabine Hoffmann, Julia Höpler, Marie Kraft, Nils Gade, Jonas Gmeiner, Daniel Roden, Inas Saleh, Christian Hagl, Georg Nickenig, Steffen Massberg, Sebastian Zimmer, Raúl Nicolás Jamin, Clemens Scherer","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001117","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001117","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with high mortality. Patients treated for CS mostly require heparin therapy, which may be associated with complications such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT represents a serious condition associated with platelet decline and increased hypercoagulability and remains a poorly researched field in intensive care medicine. Primary purpose of this study was to: 1) determine HIT prevalence in CS, 2) assess the performance of common diagnostic tests for the workup of HIT, and 3) compare outcomes in CS patients with excluded and confirmed HIT.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective dual-center study including adult patients 18 years old or older with diagnosed CS and suspected HIT from January 2010 to November 2022.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Cardiac ICU at the Ludwig-Maximilians University hospital in Munich and the university hospital of Bonn.</p><p><strong>Patients and interventions: </strong>In this retrospective analysis, adult patients with diagnosed CS and suspected HIT were included. Differences in baseline characteristics, mortality, neurologic and safety outcomes between patients with excluded and confirmed HIT were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>In cases of suspected HIT, positive screening antibodies were detected in 159 of 2808 patients (5.7%). HIT was confirmed via positive functional assay in 57 of 2808 patients, corresponding to a prevalence rate of 2.0%. The positive predictive value for anti-platelet factor 4/heparin screening antibodies was 35.8%. Total in-hospital mortality (58.8% vs. 57.9%; p > 0.999), 1-month mortality (47.1% vs. 43.9%; p = 0.781), and 12-month mortality (58.8% vs. 59.6%; p > 0.999) were similar between patients with excluded and confirmed HIT, respectively. Furthermore, no significant difference in neurologic outcome among survivors was found between groups (Cerebral Performance Category [CPC] score 1: 8.8% vs. 8.8%; p > 0.999 and CPC 2: 7.8% vs. 12.3%; p = 0.485).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HIT was a rare complication in CS patients treated with unfractionated heparin and was not associated with increased mortality. Also, HIT confirmation was not associated with worse neurologic outcome in survivors. Future studies should aim at developing more precise, standardized, and cost-effective strategies to diagnose HIT and prevent complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265775/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141753592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Patients Suffering Cardiogenic Shock. 肝素诱导的心源性休克患者血小板减少症。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-22 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001117
Enzo Lüsebrink, Hugo Lanz, Leonhard Binzenhöfer, Sabine Hoffmann, Julia Höpler, Marie Kraft, Nils Gade, Jonas Gmeiner, Daniel Roden, Inas Saleh, Christian Hagl, Georg Nickenig, Steffen Massberg, Sebastian Zimmer, Raúl Nicolás Jamin, Clemens Scherer

Objectives: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with high mortality. Patients treated for CS mostly require heparin therapy, which may be associated with complications such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT represents a serious condition associated with platelet decline and increased hypercoagulability and remains a poorly researched field in intensive care medicine. Primary purpose of this study was to: 1) determine HIT prevalence in CS, 2) assess the performance of common diagnostic tests for the workup of HIT, and 3) compare outcomes in CS patients with excluded and confirmed HIT.

Design: Retrospective dual-center study including adult patients 18 years old or older with diagnosed CS and suspected HIT from January 2010 to November 2022.

Setting: Cardiac ICU at the Ludwig-Maximilians University hospital in Munich and the university hospital of Bonn.

Patients and interventions: In this retrospective analysis, adult patients with diagnosed CS and suspected HIT were included. Differences in baseline characteristics, mortality, neurologic and safety outcomes between patients with excluded and confirmed HIT were evaluated.

Measurements and main results: In cases of suspected HIT, positive screening antibodies were detected in 159 of 2808 patients (5.7%). HIT was confirmed via positive functional assay in 57 of 2808 patients, corresponding to a prevalence rate of 2.0%. The positive predictive value for anti-platelet factor 4/heparin screening antibodies was 35.8%. Total in-hospital mortality (58.8% vs. 57.9%; p > 0.999), 1-month mortality (47.1% vs. 43.9%; p = 0.781), and 12-month mortality (58.8% vs. 59.6%; p > 0.999) were similar between patients with excluded and confirmed HIT, respectively. Furthermore, no significant difference in neurologic outcome among survivors was found between groups (Cerebral Performance Category [CPC] score 1: 8.8% vs. 8.8%; p > 0.999 and CPC 2: 7.8% vs. 12.3%; p = 0.485).

Conclusions: HIT was a rare complication in CS patients treated with unfractionated heparin and was not associated with increased mortality. Also, HIT confirmation was not associated with worse neurologic outcome in survivors. Future studies should aim at developing more precise, standardized, and cost-effective strategies to diagnose HIT and prevent complications.

目的:心源性休克(CS)死亡率很高。治疗心源性休克的患者大多需要肝素治疗,而肝素治疗可能会引起肝素诱导血小板减少症(HIT)等并发症。HIT 是一种与血小板减少和高凝状态增加有关的严重病症,在重症监护医学领域仍是一个研究较少的领域。本研究的主要目的是1)确定 HIT 在重症监护中的发病率;2)评估用于 HIT 检查的常用诊断测试的性能;3)比较排除和确诊 HIT 的重症监护患者的预后:设计:回顾性双中心研究,包括2010年1月至2022年11月期间确诊为CS和疑似HIT的18岁或18岁以上成年患者:慕尼黑路德维希-马克西米利安大学医院和波恩大学医院心脏重症监护室:在这项回顾性分析中,纳入了确诊为CS和疑似HIT的成年患者。评估了排除 HIT 和确诊 HIT 患者在基线特征、死亡率、神经系统和安全结果方面的差异:在疑似 HIT 的病例中,2808 例患者中有 159 例(5.7%)检测到阳性筛查抗体。在 2808 例患者中,有 57 例通过阳性功能测试确诊为 HIT,患病率为 2.0%。抗血小板因子 4/肝素筛查抗体的阳性预测值为 35.8%。排除型和确诊型 HIT 患者的院内总死亡率(58.8% 对 57.9%;P > 0.999)、1 个月死亡率(47.1% 对 43.9%;P = 0.781)和 12 个月死亡率(58.8% 对 59.6%;P > 0.999)分别相似。此外,各组幸存者的神经系统预后无明显差异(脑功能分类 [CPC] 评分 1:8.8% 对 8.8%;P > 0.999;CPC 评分 2:7.8% 对 12.3%;P = 0.485):HIT是接受非分叶肝素治疗的CS患者中罕见的并发症,与死亡率的增加无关。此外,HIT的确认与幸存者神经系统预后的恶化无关。未来的研究应致力于开发更精确、更标准化、更具成本效益的策略来诊断 HIT 并预防并发症。
{"title":"Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Patients Suffering Cardiogenic Shock.","authors":"Enzo Lüsebrink, Hugo Lanz, Leonhard Binzenhöfer, Sabine Hoffmann, Julia Höpler, Marie Kraft, Nils Gade, Jonas Gmeiner, Daniel Roden, Inas Saleh, Christian Hagl, Georg Nickenig, Steffen Massberg, Sebastian Zimmer, Raúl Nicolás Jamin, Clemens Scherer","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001117","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001117","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with high mortality. Patients treated for CS mostly require heparin therapy, which may be associated with complications such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). HIT represents a serious condition associated with platelet decline and increased hypercoagulability and remains a poorly researched field in intensive care medicine. Primary purpose of this study was to: 1) determine HIT prevalence in CS, 2) assess the performance of common diagnostic tests for the workup of HIT, and 3) compare outcomes in CS patients with excluded and confirmed HIT.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective dual-center study including adult patients 18 years old or older with diagnosed CS and suspected HIT from January 2010 to November 2022.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Cardiac ICU at the Ludwig-Maximilians University hospital in Munich and the university hospital of Bonn.</p><p><strong>Patients and interventions: </strong>In this retrospective analysis, adult patients with diagnosed CS and suspected HIT were included. Differences in baseline characteristics, mortality, neurologic and safety outcomes between patients with excluded and confirmed HIT were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>In cases of suspected HIT, positive screening antibodies were detected in 159 of 2808 patients (5.7%). HIT was confirmed via positive functional assay in 57 of 2808 patients, corresponding to a prevalence rate of 2.0%. The positive predictive value for anti-platelet factor 4/heparin screening antibodies was 35.8%. Total in-hospital mortality (58.8% vs. 57.9%; <i>p</i> > 0.999), 1-month mortality (47.1% vs. 43.9%; <i>p</i> = 0.781), and 12-month mortality (58.8% vs. 59.6%; <i>p</i> > 0.999) were similar between patients with excluded and confirmed HIT, respectively. Furthermore, no significant difference in neurologic outcome among survivors was found between groups (Cerebral Performance Category [CPC] score 1: 8.8% vs. 8.8%; <i>p</i> > 0.999 and CPC 2: 7.8% vs. 12.3%; <i>p</i> = 0.485).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HIT was a rare complication in CS patients treated with unfractionated heparin and was not associated with increased mortality. Also, HIT confirmation was not associated with worse neurologic outcome in survivors. Future studies should aim at developing more precise, standardized, and cost-effective strategies to diagnose HIT and prevent complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265775/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141753591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning COVID-19 Veteran (COVet) Deterioration Risk Score. 机器学习 COVID-19 退伍军人 (COVet) 病情恶化风险评分的开发与验证。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-19 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001116
Sushant Govindan, Alexandra Spicer, Matthew Bearce, Richard S Schaefer, Andrea Uhl, Gil Alterovitz, Michael J Kim, Kyle A Carey, Nirav S Shah, Christopher Winslow, Emily Gilbert, Anne Stey, Alan M Weiss, Devendra Amin, George Karway, Jennie Martin, Dana P Edelson, Matthew M Churpek

Background and objective: To develop the COVid Veteran (COVet) score for clinical deterioration in Veterans hospitalized with COVID-19 and further validate this model in both Veteran and non-Veteran samples. No such score has been derived and validated while incorporating a Veteran sample.

Derivation cohort: Adults (age ≥ 18 yr) hospitalized outside the ICU with a diagnosis of COVID-19 for model development to the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) (n = 80 hospitals).

Validation cohort: External validation occurred in a VHA cohort of 34 hospitals, as well as six non-Veteran health systems for further external validation (n = 21 hospitals) between 2020 and 2023.

Prediction model: eXtreme Gradient Boosting machine learning methods were used, and performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and compared with the National Early Warning Score (NEWS). The primary outcome was transfer to the ICU or death within 24 hours of each new variable observation. Model predictor variables included demographics, vital signs, structured flowsheet data, and laboratory values.

Results: A total of 96,908 admissions occurred during the study period, of which 59,897 were in the Veteran sample and 37,011 were in the non-Veteran sample. During external validation in the Veteran sample, the model demonstrated excellent discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88. This was significantly higher than NEWS (0.79; p < 0.01). In the non-Veteran sample, the model also demonstrated excellent discrimination (0.86 vs. 0.79 for NEWS; p < 0.01). The top three variables of importance were eosinophil percentage, mean oxygen saturation in the prior 24-hour period, and worst mental status in the prior 24-hour period.

Conclusions: We used machine learning methods to develop and validate a highly accurate early warning score in both Veterans and non-Veterans hospitalized with COVID-19. The model could lead to earlier identification and therapy, which may improve outcomes.

背景和目的:针对因 COVID-19 而住院的退伍军人的临床恶化情况制定 COVid 退伍军人(COVet)评分,并在退伍军人和非退伍军人样本中进一步验证该模型。衍生队列:在重症监护室外住院并诊断为 COVID-19 的成人(年龄≥ 18 岁),用于退伍军人健康管理局 (VHA) 的模型开发(n = 80 家医院)。验证队列:外部验证在退伍军人健康管理局的 34 家医院队列中进行,并在 2020 年至 2023 年期间在 6 家非退伍军人健康系统中进行进一步外部验证(n = 21 家医院)。预测模型:使用梯度提升机器学习方法,使用接收器操作特征曲线下面积评估性能,并与国家预警评分(NEWS)进行比较。主要结果是在观察到每个新变量后的 24 小时内转入重症监护室或死亡。模型预测变量包括人口统计学、生命体征、结构化流程表数据和实验室值:研究期间共有96908人入院,其中退伍军人样本为59897人,非退伍军人样本为37011人。在退伍军人样本的外部验证中,该模型表现出了极佳的辨别能力,接收者操作特征曲线下面积为 0.88。这明显高于 "新闻"(0.79;P < 0.01)。在非退伍军人样本中,该模型也表现出了极佳的辨别能力(0.86,而 NEWS 为 0.79;p < 0.01)。最重要的三个变量是嗜酸性粒细胞百分比、前24小时的平均血氧饱和度和前24小时的最差精神状态:我们使用机器学习方法开发并验证了一种高度准确的预警评分,适用于因 COVID-19 而住院的退伍军人和非退伍军人。该模型可以提前识别和治疗,从而改善预后。
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Machine Learning COVID-19 Veteran (COVet) Deterioration Risk Score.","authors":"Sushant Govindan, Alexandra Spicer, Matthew Bearce, Richard S Schaefer, Andrea Uhl, Gil Alterovitz, Michael J Kim, Kyle A Carey, Nirav S Shah, Christopher Winslow, Emily Gilbert, Anne Stey, Alan M Weiss, Devendra Amin, George Karway, Jennie Martin, Dana P Edelson, Matthew M Churpek","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001116","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001116","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>To develop the COVid Veteran (COVet) score for clinical deterioration in Veterans hospitalized with COVID-19 and further validate this model in both Veteran and non-Veteran samples. No such score has been derived and validated while incorporating a Veteran sample.</p><p><strong>Derivation cohort: </strong>Adults (age ≥ 18 yr) hospitalized outside the ICU with a diagnosis of COVID-19 for model development to the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) (n = 80 hospitals).</p><p><strong>Validation cohort: </strong>External validation occurred in a VHA cohort of 34 hospitals, as well as six non-Veteran health systems for further external validation (n = 21 hospitals) between 2020 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Prediction model: </strong>eXtreme Gradient Boosting machine learning methods were used, and performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and compared with the National Early Warning Score (NEWS). The primary outcome was transfer to the ICU or death within 24 hours of each new variable observation. Model predictor variables included demographics, vital signs, structured flowsheet data, and laboratory values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 96,908 admissions occurred during the study period, of which 59,897 were in the Veteran sample and 37,011 were in the non-Veteran sample. During external validation in the Veteran sample, the model demonstrated excellent discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88. This was significantly higher than NEWS (0.79; p < 0.01). In the non-Veteran sample, the model also demonstrated excellent discrimination (0.86 vs. 0.79 for NEWS; p < 0.01). The top three variables of importance were eosinophil percentage, mean oxygen saturation in the prior 24-hour period, and worst mental status in the prior 24-hour period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We used machine learning methods to develop and validate a highly accurate early warning score in both Veterans and non-Veterans hospitalized with COVID-19. The model could lead to earlier identification and therapy, which may improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262818/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141728468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COVID-19 Across Pandemic Variant Periods: The Severe Acute Respiratory Infection-Preparedness (SARI-PREP) Study. 跨越大流行变异期的 COVID-19:严重急性呼吸道感染准备(SARI-PREP)研究。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-18 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001122
Vikramjit Mukherjee, Radu Postelnicu, Chelsie Parker, Patrick S Rivers, George L Anesi, Adair Andrews, Erin Ables, Eric D Morrell, David M Brett-Major, M Jana Broadhurst, J Perren Cobb, Amy Irwin, Christopher J Kratochvil, Kelsey Krolikowski, Vishakha K Kumar, Douglas P Landsittel, Richard A Lee, Janice M Liebler, Leopoldo N Segal, Jonathan E Sevransky, Avantika Srivastava, Timothy M Uyeki, Mark M Wurfel, David Wyles, Laura E Evans, Karen Lutrick, Pavan K Bhatraju

Importance: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has evolved through multiple phases in the United States, with significant differences in patient centered outcomes with improvements in hospital strain, medical countermeasures, and overall understanding of the disease. We describe how patient characteristics changed and care progressed over the various pandemic phases; we also emphasize the need for an ongoing clinical network to improve the understanding of known and novel respiratory viral diseases.

Objectives: To describe how patient characteristics and care evolved across the various COVID-19 pandemic periods in those hospitalized with viral severe acute respiratory infection (SARI).

Design: Severe Acute Respiratory Infection-Preparedness (SARI-PREP) is a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Foundation-funded, Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery-housed, longitudinal multicenter cohort study of viral pneumonia. We defined SARI patients as those hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infection and an acute syndrome of fever, cough, and radiographic infiltrates or hypoxemia. We collected patient-level data including demographic characteristics, comorbidities, acute physiologic measures, serum and respiratory specimens, therapeutics, and outcomes. Outcomes were described across four pandemic variant periods based on a SARS-CoV-2 sequenced subsample: pre-Delta, Delta, Omicron BA.1, and Omicron post-BA.1.

Setting: Multicenter cohort of adult patients admitted to an acute care ward or ICU from seven hospitals representing diverse geographic regions across the United States.

Participants: Patients with SARI caused by infection with respiratory viruses.

Main outcomes and results: Eight hundred seventy-four adult patients with SARI were enrolled at seven study hospitals between March 2020 and April 2023. Most patients (780, 89%) had SARS-CoV-2 infection. Across the COVID-19 cohort, median age was 60 years (interquartile range, 48.0-71.0 yr) and 66% were male. Almost half (430, 49%) of the study population belonged to underserved communities. Most patients (76.5%) were admitted to the ICU, 52.5% received mechanical ventilation, and observed hospital mortality was 25.5%. As the pandemic progressed, we observed decreases in ICU utilization (94% to 58%), hospital length of stay (median, 26.0 to 8.5 d), and hospital mortality (32% to 12%), while the number of comorbid conditions increased.

Conclusions and relevance: We describe increasing comorbidities but improved outcomes across pandemic variant periods, in the setting of multiple factors, including evolving care delivery, countermeasures, and viral variants. An understanding of patient-level factors may inform treatment options for subsequent variants and future novel pathogens.

重要性:严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)大流行在美国经历了多个阶段,随着医院应变能力、医疗对策和对疾病整体认识的提高,以患者为中心的治疗效果也出现了显著差异。我们描述了患者特征在不同大流行阶段的变化和护理进展;我们还强调了建立持续临床网络的必要性,以提高对已知和新型呼吸道病毒性疾病的认识:描述在 COVID-19 大流行的不同时期,因病毒性严重急性呼吸道感染 (SARI) 而住院的患者的特征和护理是如何演变的:严重急性呼吸道感染防备(SARI-PREP)是一项由美国疾病控制与预防中心基金会资助、重症医学发现协会主持的病毒性肺炎纵向多中心队列研究。我们将 SARI 患者定义为经实验室确诊为呼吸道病毒感染并伴有发热、咳嗽、影像学浸润或低氧血症等急性综合征的住院患者。我们收集了患者层面的数据,包括人口统计学特征、合并症、急性生理指标、血清和呼吸道标本、治疗方法和结果。根据 SARS-CoV-2 测序子样本,描述了四个大流行变异期的结果:Delta 前、Delta、Omicron BA.1 和 Omicron 后-BA.1:多中心队列:来自美国不同地区七家医院的急症病房或重症监护室的成年患者:由呼吸道病毒感染引起的SARI患者:2020年3月至2023年4月期间,七家研究医院共招募了874名SARI成年患者。大多数患者(780 人,89%)感染了 SARS-CoV-2。在 COVID-19 组群中,年龄中位数为 60 岁(四分位数间距为 48.0-71.0 岁),66% 为男性。近一半(430 人,49%)的研究人群属于服务不足的社区。大多数患者(76.5%)住进了重症监护室,52.5%接受了机械通气,观察到的住院死亡率为25.5%。随着疫情的发展,我们观察到重症监护室的使用率(94% 到 58%)、住院时间(中位数,26.0 到 8.5 天)和医院死亡率(32% 到 12%)均有所下降,而合并症的数量却有所增加:我们描述了在大流行变异时期,在多种因素(包括不断变化的医疗服务、应对措施和病毒变异)的影响下,合并症增加但治疗效果改善的情况。了解患者层面的因素可为后续变异和未来新型病原体的治疗方案提供参考。
{"title":"COVID-19 Across Pandemic Variant Periods: The Severe Acute Respiratory Infection-Preparedness (SARI-PREP) Study.","authors":"Vikramjit Mukherjee, Radu Postelnicu, Chelsie Parker, Patrick S Rivers, George L Anesi, Adair Andrews, Erin Ables, Eric D Morrell, David M Brett-Major, M Jana Broadhurst, J Perren Cobb, Amy Irwin, Christopher J Kratochvil, Kelsey Krolikowski, Vishakha K Kumar, Douglas P Landsittel, Richard A Lee, Janice M Liebler, Leopoldo N Segal, Jonathan E Sevransky, Avantika Srivastava, Timothy M Uyeki, Mark M Wurfel, David Wyles, Laura E Evans, Karen Lutrick, Pavan K Bhatraju","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001122","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001122","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has evolved through multiple phases in the United States, with significant differences in patient centered outcomes with improvements in hospital strain, medical countermeasures, and overall understanding of the disease. We describe how patient characteristics changed and care progressed over the various pandemic phases; we also emphasize the need for an ongoing clinical network to improve the understanding of known and novel respiratory viral diseases.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe how patient characteristics and care evolved across the various COVID-19 pandemic periods in those hospitalized with viral severe acute respiratory infection (SARI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Severe Acute Respiratory Infection-Preparedness (SARI-PREP) is a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Foundation-funded, Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery-housed, longitudinal multicenter cohort study of viral pneumonia. We defined SARI patients as those hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infection and an acute syndrome of fever, cough, and radiographic infiltrates or hypoxemia. We collected patient-level data including demographic characteristics, comorbidities, acute physiologic measures, serum and respiratory specimens, therapeutics, and outcomes. Outcomes were described across four pandemic variant periods based on a SARS-CoV-2 sequenced subsample: pre-Delta, Delta, Omicron BA.1, and Omicron post-BA.1.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Multicenter cohort of adult patients admitted to an acute care ward or ICU from seven hospitals representing diverse geographic regions across the United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients with SARI caused by infection with respiratory viruses.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and results: </strong>Eight hundred seventy-four adult patients with SARI were enrolled at seven study hospitals between March 2020 and April 2023. Most patients (780, 89%) had SARS-CoV-2 infection. Across the COVID-19 cohort, median age was 60 years (interquartile range, 48.0-71.0 yr) and 66% were male. Almost half (430, 49%) of the study population belonged to underserved communities. Most patients (76.5%) were admitted to the ICU, 52.5% received mechanical ventilation, and observed hospital mortality was 25.5%. As the pandemic progressed, we observed decreases in ICU utilization (94% to 58%), hospital length of stay (median, 26.0 to 8.5 d), and hospital mortality (32% to 12%), while the number of comorbid conditions increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>We describe increasing comorbidities but improved outcomes across pandemic variant periods, in the setting of multiple factors, including evolving care delivery, countermeasures, and viral variants. An understanding of patient-level factors may inform treatment options for subsequent variants and future novel pathogens.</p","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11259394/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141636149","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Lung Protective Ventilation Adherence and Outcomes for Patients With COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Treated in an Intermediate Care Unit Repurposed to ICU Level of Care. 在中级护理病房接受治疗的 COVID-19 急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的肺保护性通气坚持率和疗效,改用重症监护病房护理级别。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-17 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001127
Chad H Hochberg, Aaron S Case, Kevin J Psoter, Daniel Brodie, Rebecca H Dezube, Sarina K Sahetya, Carrie Outten, Lara Street, Michelle N Eakin, David N Hager

Objective: During the COVID-19 pandemic, some centers converted intermediate care units (IMCUs) to COVID-19 ICUs (IMCU/ICUs). In this study, we compared adherence to lung protective ventilation (LPV) and outcomes for patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) treated in an IMCU/ICU versus preexisting medical ICUs (MICUs).

Design: Retrospective observational study using electronic medical record data.

Setting: Two academic medical centers from March 2020 to September 2020 (period 1) and October 2020 to May 2021 (period 2), which capture the first two COVID-19 surges in this health system.

Patients: Adults with COVID-19 receiving invasive mechanical ventilation who met ARDS oxygenation criteria (Pao2/Fio2 ≤ 300 mm Hg or Spo2/Fio2 ≤ 315).

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: We defined LPV adherence as the percent of the first 48 hours of mechanical ventilation that met a restrictive definition of LPV of, tidal volume/predicted body weight (Vt/PBW) less than or equal to 6.5 mL/kg and plateau pressure (Pplat) less than or equal to 30 cm H2o. In an expanded definition, we added that if Pplat is greater than 30 cm H2o, Vt/PBW had to be less than 6.0 mL/kg. Using the restricted definition, period 1 adherence was lower among 133 IMCU/ICU versus 199 MICU patients (92% [95% CI, 50-100] vs. 100% [86-100], p = 0.05). Period 2 adherence was similar between groups (100% [75-100] vs. 95% CI [65-100], p = 0.68). A similar pattern was observed using the expanded definition. For the full study period, the adjusted hazard of death at 90 days was lower in IMCU/ICU versus MICU patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73 [95% CI, 0.55-0.99]), whereas ventilator liberation by day 28 was similar between groups (adjusted subdistribution HR 1.09 [95% CI, 0.85-1.39]).

Conclusions: In patients with COVID-19 ARDS treated in an IMCU/ICU, LPV adherence was similar to, and observed survival better than those treated in preexisting MICUs. With adequate resources, protocols, and staffing, IMCUs provide an effective source of additional ICU capacity for patients with acute respiratory failure.

目的:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,一些中心将中级护理病房 (IMCU) 转为 COVID-19 重症监护病房 (IMCU/ICU)。在这项研究中,我们比较了在 IMCU/ICU 和原有的内科 ICU(MICU)中接受治疗的 COVID-19 相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者坚持肺保护性通气(LPV)的情况和结果:设计:使用电子病历数据进行回顾性观察研究:两个学术医疗中心,时间分别为 2020 年 3 月至 2020 年 9 月(第一阶段)和 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 5 月(第二阶段),这两个阶段是该医疗系统前两次 COVID-19 高峰期:患者:接受有创机械通气且符合 ARDS 氧合标准(Pao2/Fio2 ≤ 300 mm Hg 或 Spo2/Fio2 ≤ 315)的 COVID-19 成人:测量和主要结果我们将LPV依从性定义为符合LPV限制性定义的前48小时机械通气的百分比,即潮气量/预测体重(Vt/PBW)小于或等于6.5 mL/kg,高原压(Pplat)小于或等于30 cm H2o。在扩展定义中,我们增加了一条:如果 Pplat 大于 30 cm H2o,则 Vt/PBW 必须小于 6.0 mL/kg。使用限制性定义后,133 名 IMCU/ICU 患者与 199 名 MICU 患者相比,第一阶段的依从性较低(92% [95% CI, 50-100] vs. 100% [86-100],P = 0.05)。各组患者在第二阶段的依从性相似(100% [75-100] vs. 95% CI [65-100],p = 0.68)。使用扩展定义也观察到类似的模式。在整个研究期间,IMCU/ICU 患者与 MICU 患者相比,调整后的 90 天死亡风险较低(风险比 [HR] 0.73 [95% CI, 0.55-0.99]),而第 28 天脱离呼吸机的情况组间相似(调整后的子分布 HR 1.09 [95% CI, 0.85-1.39]):结论:在 IMCU/ICU 接受治疗的 COVID-19 ARDS 患者中,LPV 的依从性与在原有 MICU 接受治疗的患者相似,观察到的存活率也高于后者。如果有足够的资源、方案和人员,IMCU 可以有效地为急性呼吸衰竭患者提供额外的 ICU 容量。
{"title":"Lung Protective Ventilation Adherence and Outcomes for Patients With COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Treated in an Intermediate Care Unit Repurposed to ICU Level of Care.","authors":"Chad H Hochberg, Aaron S Case, Kevin J Psoter, Daniel Brodie, Rebecca H Dezube, Sarina K Sahetya, Carrie Outten, Lara Street, Michelle N Eakin, David N Hager","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001127","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001127","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, some centers converted intermediate care units (IMCUs) to COVID-19 ICUs (IMCU/ICUs). In this study, we compared adherence to lung protective ventilation (LPV) and outcomes for patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) treated in an IMCU/ICU versus preexisting medical ICUs (MICUs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study using electronic medical record data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two academic medical centers from March 2020 to September 2020 (period 1) and October 2020 to May 2021 (period 2), which capture the first two COVID-19 surges in this health system.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults with COVID-19 receiving invasive mechanical ventilation who met ARDS oxygenation criteria (Pao2/Fio2 ≤ 300 mm Hg or Spo2/Fio2 ≤ 315).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We defined LPV adherence as the percent of the first 48 hours of mechanical ventilation that met a restrictive definition of LPV of, tidal volume/predicted body weight (Vt/PBW) less than or equal to 6.5 mL/kg and plateau pressure (Pplat) less than or equal to 30 cm H2o. In an expanded definition, we added that if Pplat is greater than 30 cm H2o, Vt/PBW had to be less than 6.0 mL/kg. Using the restricted definition, period 1 adherence was lower among 133 IMCU/ICU versus 199 MICU patients (92% [95% CI, 50-100] vs. 100% [86-100], p = 0.05). Period 2 adherence was similar between groups (100% [75-100] vs. 95% CI [65-100], p = 0.68). A similar pattern was observed using the expanded definition. For the full study period, the adjusted hazard of death at 90 days was lower in IMCU/ICU versus MICU patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73 [95% CI, 0.55-0.99]), whereas ventilator liberation by day 28 was similar between groups (adjusted subdistribution HR 1.09 [95% CI, 0.85-1.39]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with COVID-19 ARDS treated in an IMCU/ICU, LPV adherence was similar to, and observed survival better than those treated in preexisting MICUs. With adequate resources, protocols, and staffing, IMCUs provide an effective source of additional ICU capacity for patients with acute respiratory failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257666/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141636150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Opioid Administration Practice Patterns in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure Who Undergo Invasive Mechanical Ventilation. 接受侵入性机械通气的急性呼吸衰竭患者的阿片类药物应用实践模式。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-17 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001123
Laura C Myers, Nicholas A Bosch, Lauren Soltesz, Kathleen A Daly, Cynthia I Campbell, Emma Schwager, Emmanuele Salvati, Jennifer P Stevens, Hannah Wunsch, Justin M Rucci, S Reza Jafarzadeh, Vincent X Liu, Allan J Walkey

Importance: The opioid crisis is impacting people across the country and deserves attention to be able to curb the rise in opioid-related deaths.

Objectives: To evaluate practice patterns in opioid infusion administration and dosing for patients with acute respiratory failure receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting and participants: Patients from 21 hospitals in Kaiser Permanente Northern California and 96 hospitals in Philips electronic ICU Research Institute.

Main outcomes and measures: We assessed whether patients received opioid infusion and the dose of said opioid infusion.

Results: We identified patients with a diagnosis of acute respiratory failure who were initiated on invasive mechanical ventilation. From each patient, we determined if opioid infusions were administered and, among those who received an opioid infusion, the median daily dose of fentanyl infusion. We used hierarchical regression models to quantify variation in opioid infusion use and the median daily dose of fentanyl equivalents across hospitals. We included 13,140 patients in the KPNC cohort and 52,033 patients in the eRI cohort. A total of 7,023 (53.4%) and 16,311 (31.1%) patients received an opioid infusion in the first 21 days of mechanical ventilation in the KPNC and eRI cohorts, respectively. After accounting for patient- and hospital-level fixed effects, the hospital that a patient was admitted to explained 7% (95% CI, 3-11%) and 39% (95% CI, 28-49%) of the variation in opioid infusion use in the KPNC and eRI cohorts, respectively. Among patients who received an opioid infusion, the median daily fentanyl equivalent dose was 692 µg (interquartile range [IQR], 129-1341 µg) in the KPNC cohort and 200 µg (IQR, 0-1050 µg) in the eRI cohort. Hospital explained 4% (95% CI, 1-7%) and 20% (95% CI, 15-26%) of the variation in median daily fentanyl equivalent dose in the KPNC and eRI cohorts, respectively.

Conclusions and relevance: In the context of efforts to limit healthcare-associated opioid exposure, our findings highlight the considerable opioid exposure that accompanies mechanical ventilation and suggest potential under and over-treatment with analgesia. Our results facilitate benchmarking of hospitals' analgesia practices against risk-adjusted averages and can be used to inform usual care control arms of analgesia and sedation clinical trials.

重要性:阿片类药物危机正影响着全国各地的人们,为遏制阿片类药物相关死亡人数的上升,这一问题值得关注:评估接受有创机械通气的急性呼吸衰竭患者阿片类药物输注管理和剂量的实践模式:设计:回顾性队列研究:来自北加州凯撒医疗集团 21 家医院和飞利浦电子 ICU 研究所 96 家医院的患者:我们对患者是否接受阿片类药物输注以及输注剂量进行了评估:我们确定了诊断为急性呼吸衰竭并开始接受有创机械通气的患者。我们确定了每位患者是否接受了阿片类药物输注,并确定了接受阿片类药物输注者的芬太尼每日输注剂量中位数。我们使用分层回归模型来量化各家医院在阿片类药物输注使用和芬太尼当量日剂量中位数方面的差异。我们将 13140 名患者纳入 KPNC 队列,将 52033 名患者纳入 eRI 队列。在 KPNC 和 eRI 队列中,分别有 7023 名(53.4%)和 16311 名(31.1%)患者在机械通气的前 21 天接受了阿片类药物输注。在考虑了患者和医院层面的固定效应后,患者入院的医院分别解释了 KPNC 和 eRI 队列中阿片类药物输注使用变化的 7% (95% CI, 3-11%) 和 39% (95% CI, 28-49%)。在接受阿片类药物输注的患者中,KPNC队列和eRI队列的每日芬太尼等效剂量中位数分别为692微克(四分位距[IQR]为129-1341微克)和200微克(四分位距[IQR]为0-1050微克)。在KPNC队列和eRI队列中,医院分别解释了4%(95% CI,1-7%)和20%(95% CI,15-26%)的每日芬太尼当量中位剂量变化:在努力限制医疗相关阿片类药物暴露的背景下,我们的研究结果突显了伴随机械通气而来的大量阿片类药物暴露,并表明可能存在镇痛治疗不足或过度的情况。我们的研究结果有助于将医院的镇痛措施与风险调整后的平均值进行比较,并可用于镇痛和镇静临床试验的常规护理对照组。
{"title":"Opioid Administration Practice Patterns in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure Who Undergo Invasive Mechanical Ventilation.","authors":"Laura C Myers, Nicholas A Bosch, Lauren Soltesz, Kathleen A Daly, Cynthia I Campbell, Emma Schwager, Emmanuele Salvati, Jennifer P Stevens, Hannah Wunsch, Justin M Rucci, S Reza Jafarzadeh, Vincent X Liu, Allan J Walkey","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001123","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001123","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>The opioid crisis is impacting people across the country and deserves attention to be able to curb the rise in opioid-related deaths.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate practice patterns in opioid infusion administration and dosing for patients with acute respiratory failure receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Patients from 21 hospitals in Kaiser Permanente Northern California and 96 hospitals in Philips electronic ICU Research Institute.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>We assessed whether patients received opioid infusion and the dose of said opioid infusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified patients with a diagnosis of acute respiratory failure who were initiated on invasive mechanical ventilation. From each patient, we determined if opioid infusions were administered and, among those who received an opioid infusion, the median daily dose of fentanyl infusion. We used hierarchical regression models to quantify variation in opioid infusion use and the median daily dose of fentanyl equivalents across hospitals. We included 13,140 patients in the KPNC cohort and 52,033 patients in the eRI cohort. A total of 7,023 (53.4%) and 16,311 (31.1%) patients received an opioid infusion in the first 21 days of mechanical ventilation in the KPNC and eRI cohorts, respectively. After accounting for patient- and hospital-level fixed effects, the hospital that a patient was admitted to explained 7% (95% CI, 3-11%) and 39% (95% CI, 28-49%) of the variation in opioid infusion use in the KPNC and eRI cohorts, respectively. Among patients who received an opioid infusion, the median daily fentanyl equivalent dose was 692 µg (interquartile range [IQR], 129-1341 µg) in the KPNC cohort and 200 µg (IQR, 0-1050 µg) in the eRI cohort. Hospital explained 4% (95% CI, 1-7%) and 20% (95% CI, 15-26%) of the variation in median daily fentanyl equivalent dose in the KPNC and eRI cohorts, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In the context of efforts to limit healthcare-associated opioid exposure, our findings highlight the considerable opioid exposure that accompanies mechanical ventilation and suggest potential under and over-treatment with analgesia. Our results facilitate benchmarking of hospitals' analgesia practices against risk-adjusted averages and can be used to inform usual care control arms of analgesia and sedation clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257673/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141636109","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Deriving Automated Device Metadata From Intracranial Pressure Waveforms: A Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury ICU Physiology Cohort Analysis. 从颅内压波形得出自动设备元数据:创伤性脑损伤重症监护室生理学队列分析的研究与临床知识变革。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-16 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001118
Sophie E Ack, Rianne G F Dolmans, Brandon Foreman, Geoffrey T Manley, Eric S Rosenthal, Morteza Zabihi

Importance: Treatment for intracranial pressure (ICP) has been increasingly informed by machine learning (ML)-derived ICP waveform characteristics. There are gaps, however, in understanding how ICP monitor type may bias waveform characteristics used for these predictive tools since differences between external ventricular drain (EVD) and intraparenchymal monitor (IPM)-derived waveforms have not been well accounted for.

Objectives: We sought to develop a proof-of-concept ML model differentiating ICP waveforms originating from an EVD or IPM.

Design, setting, and participants: We examined raw ICP waveform data from the ICU physiology cohort within the prospective Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury multicenter study.

Main outcomes and measures: Nested patient-wise five-fold cross-validation and group analysis with bagged decision trees (BDT) and linear discriminant analysis were used for feature selection and fair evaluation. Nine patients were kept as unseen hold-outs for further evaluation.

Results: ICP waveform data totaling 14,110 hours were included from 82 patients (EVD, 47; IPM, 26; both, 9). Mean age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) total, and GCS motor score upon admission, as well as the presence and amount of midline shift, were similar between groups. The model mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AU-ROC) exceeded 0.874 across all folds. In additional rigorous cluster-based subgroup analysis, targeted at testing the resilience of models to cross-validation with smaller subsets constructed to develop models in one confounder set and test them in another subset, AU-ROC exceeded 0.811. In a similar analysis using propensity score-based rather than cluster-based subgroup analysis, the mean AU-ROC exceeded 0.827. Of 842 extracted ICP features, 62 were invariant within every analysis, representing the most accurate and robust differences between ICP monitor types. For the nine patient hold-outs, an AU-ROC of 0.826 was obtained using BDT.

Conclusions and relevance: The developed proof-of-concept ML model identified differences in EVD- and IPM-derived ICP signals, which can provide missing contextual data for large-scale retrospective datasets, prevent bias in computational models that ingest ICP data indiscriminately, and control for confounding using our model's output as a propensity score by to adjust for the monitoring method that was clinically indicated. Furthermore, the invariant features may be leveraged as ICP features for anomaly detection.

重要性:颅内压 (ICP) 治疗越来越多地参考机器学习 (ML) 导出的 ICP 波形特征。然而,由于心室外引流管(EVD)和实质内监护仪(IPM)得出的波形之间的差异尚未得到很好的解释,因此在了解 ICP 监护仪类型如何可能使这些预测工具使用的波形特征产生偏差方面还存在差距:我们试图建立一个概念验证 ML 模型,以区分源自 EVD 或 IPM 的 ICP 波形:我们检查了前瞻性脑损伤研究与临床知识转化多中心研究中 ICU 生理队列的原始 ICP 波形数据:在特征选择和公平性评估中,采用了嵌套式患者五倍交叉验证和分组分析,并使用了袋式决策树(BDT)和线性判别分析。九名患者作为未见过的候选者接受进一步评估:82名患者(EVD,47人;IPM,26人;两者,9人)共14110小时的ICP波形数据。各组患者入院时的平均年龄、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)总分和 GCS 运动评分以及中线移位的存在和程度相似。所有折线的接收者操作特征曲线下的模型平均面积(AU-ROC)都超过了 0.874。在额外的基于群组的严格亚组分析中,AU-ROC 超过了 0.811,该分析的目的是用较小的子集来测试模型对交叉验证的适应性,以便在一个混杂因素集中建立模型,并在另一个子集中进行测试。在一项类似的分析中,使用基于倾向得分而非基于聚类的子集分析,平均 AU-ROC 超过了 0.827。在提取的 842 个 ICP 特征中,有 62 个在每次分析中都是不变的,代表了 ICP 监护仪类型之间最准确、最稳健的差异。对于 9 名暂缓治疗的患者,使用 BDT 得出的 AU-ROC 为 0.826:所开发的概念验证 ML 模型识别了 EVD 和 IPM 导出的 ICP 信号的差异,可为大规模回顾性数据集提供缺失的上下文数据,防止计算模型在不加区分地摄取 ICP 数据时出现偏差,并利用我们的模型输出作为倾向得分来控制混杂因素,从而调整临床上指示的监测方法。此外,不变量特征还可用作异常检测的 ICP 特征。
{"title":"Deriving Automated Device Metadata From Intracranial Pressure Waveforms: A Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury ICU Physiology Cohort Analysis.","authors":"Sophie E Ack, Rianne G F Dolmans, Brandon Foreman, Geoffrey T Manley, Eric S Rosenthal, Morteza Zabihi","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001118","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001118","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Treatment for intracranial pressure (ICP) has been increasingly informed by machine learning (ML)-derived ICP waveform characteristics. There are gaps, however, in understanding how ICP monitor type may bias waveform characteristics used for these predictive tools since differences between external ventricular drain (EVD) and intraparenchymal monitor (IPM)-derived waveforms have not been well accounted for.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to develop a proof-of-concept ML model differentiating ICP waveforms originating from an EVD or IPM.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>We examined raw ICP waveform data from the ICU physiology cohort within the prospective Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury multicenter study.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Nested patient-wise five-fold cross-validation and group analysis with bagged decision trees (BDT) and linear discriminant analysis were used for feature selection and fair evaluation. Nine patients were kept as unseen hold-outs for further evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ICP waveform data totaling 14,110 hours were included from 82 patients (EVD, 47; IPM, 26; both, 9). Mean age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) total, and GCS motor score upon admission, as well as the presence and amount of midline shift, were similar between groups. The model mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AU-ROC) exceeded 0.874 across all folds. In additional rigorous cluster-based subgroup analysis, targeted at testing the resilience of models to cross-validation with smaller subsets constructed to develop models in one confounder set and test them in another subset, AU-ROC exceeded 0.811. In a similar analysis using propensity score-based rather than cluster-based subgroup analysis, the mean AU-ROC exceeded 0.827. Of 842 extracted ICP features, 62 were invariant within every analysis, representing the most accurate and robust differences between ICP monitor types. For the nine patient hold-outs, an AU-ROC of 0.826 was obtained using BDT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The developed proof-of-concept ML model identified differences in EVD- and IPM-derived ICP signals, which can provide missing contextual data for large-scale retrospective datasets, prevent bias in computational models that ingest ICP data indiscriminately, and control for confounding using our model's output as a propensity score by to adjust for the monitoring method that was clinically indicated. Furthermore, the invariant features may be leveraged as ICP features for anomaly detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11254120/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141629583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Time-Dependent Changes in Pulmonary Turnover of Thrombocytes During Critical COVID-19. 危重症 COVID-19 期间血栓细胞肺周转率的时间依赖性变化
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-16 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001128
Nikolai Ravn Aarskog, Ronja Hallem, Jakob Strand Godhavn, Morten Rostrup

Objectives background: Under normal conditions, pulmonary megakaryocytes are an important source of circulating thrombocytes, causing thrombocyte counts to be higher in arterial than venous blood. In critical COVID-19, thrombocytes may be removed from the circulation by the lungs because of immunothrombosis, possibly causing venous thrombocyte counts to be higher than arterial thrombocyte counts. In the present study, we investigated time-dependent changes in pulmonary turnover of thrombocytes during critical COVID-19 by measuring arteriovenous thrombocyte differences. We hypothesized that the early stages of the disease would be characterized by a net pulmonary removal of circulating thrombocytes because of immunothrombosis and that later stages would be characterized by a net pulmonary release of thrombocytes as normal pulmonary function is restored.

Design: Cohort study with repeated measurements of arterial and central venous thrombocyte counts.

Setting: ICU in a large university hospital.

Patients: Thirty-one patients with critical COVID-19 that were admitted to the ICU and received invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: We found a significant positive association between the arteriovenous thrombocyte difference and time since symptom debut. This finding indicates a negative arteriovenous thrombocyte difference and hence pulmonary removal of thrombocytes in the early stages of the disease and a positive arteriovenous thrombocyte difference and hence pulmonary release of thrombocytes in later stages. Most individual arteriovenous thrombocyte differences were smaller than the variance coefficient of the analysis.

Conclusions: The results of this study support our hypothesis that early stages of critical COVID-19 are characterized by pulmonary removal of circulating thrombocytes because of immunothrombosis and that later stages are characterized by the return of normal pulmonary release of thrombocytes. However, in most cases, the arteriovenous thrombocyte difference was too small to say anything about pulmonary thrombocyte removal and release on an individual level.

目标背景:正常情况下,肺巨核细胞是循环中血小板的重要来源,导致动脉血中的血小板计数高于静脉血。在危重的 COVID-19 中,由于免疫血栓形成,血小板可能会被肺从血液循环中清除,这可能会导致静脉血中的血小板计数高于动脉血中的血小板计数。在本研究中,我们通过测量动静脉血小板差异,研究了 COVID-19 危重症期间肺部血小板周转随时间的变化。我们假设,在疾病的早期阶段,由于免疫血栓形成,循环中的血小板会在肺部净清除,而在后期阶段,随着肺部功能恢复正常,血小板会在肺部净释放:设计:队列研究,重复测量动脉和中心静脉血小板计数:地点:一所大型大学医院的重症监护室:31名危重COVID-19患者入住重症监护室,接受有创或无创机械通气:测量和主要结果我们发现动静脉血小板差异与症状出现时间之间存在明显的正相关。这一结果表明,在疾病的早期阶段,动静脉血小板差异为负值,因此肺部会清除血小板;在晚期阶段,动静脉血小板差异为正值,因此肺部会释放血小板。大多数个体动静脉血小板差异小于分析的方差系数:这项研究的结果支持了我们的假设,即危重 COVID-19 早期的特点是由于免疫血栓形成导致循环中的血小板被肺部清除,而晚期的特点是血小板的肺部释放恢复正常。然而,在大多数病例中,动静脉血小板差异太小,无法从个体层面说明肺部血小板清除和释放的情况。
{"title":"Time-Dependent Changes in Pulmonary Turnover of Thrombocytes During Critical COVID-19.","authors":"Nikolai Ravn Aarskog, Ronja Hallem, Jakob Strand Godhavn, Morten Rostrup","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001128","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001128","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives background: </strong>Under normal conditions, pulmonary megakaryocytes are an important source of circulating thrombocytes, causing thrombocyte counts to be higher in arterial than venous blood. In critical COVID-19, thrombocytes may be removed from the circulation by the lungs because of immunothrombosis, possibly causing venous thrombocyte counts to be higher than arterial thrombocyte counts. In the present study, we investigated time-dependent changes in pulmonary turnover of thrombocytes during critical COVID-19 by measuring arteriovenous thrombocyte differences. We hypothesized that the early stages of the disease would be characterized by a net pulmonary removal of circulating thrombocytes because of immunothrombosis and that later stages would be characterized by a net pulmonary release of thrombocytes as normal pulmonary function is restored.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cohort study with repeated measurements of arterial and central venous thrombocyte counts.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>ICU in a large university hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Thirty-one patients with critical COVID-19 that were admitted to the ICU and received invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We found a significant positive association between the arteriovenous thrombocyte difference and time since symptom debut. This finding indicates a negative arteriovenous thrombocyte difference and hence pulmonary removal of thrombocytes in the early stages of the disease and a positive arteriovenous thrombocyte difference and hence pulmonary release of thrombocytes in later stages. Most individual arteriovenous thrombocyte differences were smaller than the variance coefficient of the analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study support our hypothesis that early stages of critical COVID-19 are characterized by pulmonary removal of circulating thrombocytes because of immunothrombosis and that later stages are characterized by the return of normal pulmonary release of thrombocytes. However, in most cases, the arteriovenous thrombocyte difference was too small to say anything about pulmonary thrombocyte removal and release on an individual level.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11254116/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141636110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Organ Involvement Related to Death in Critically Ill Patients With Leptospirosis: Unsupervised Analysis in a French West Indies ICU. 与钩端螺旋体病重症患者死亡有关的器官受累情况:法属西印度群岛重症监护病房的无监督分析。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-08 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001126
Laurent Camous, Jean-David Pommier, Benoît Tressières, Frederic Martino, Mathieu Picardeau, Cecile Loraux, Marc Valette, Hugo Chaumont, Michel Carles, Alexandre Demoule, Sebastien Breurec

Objectives: To identify distinct phenotypes of critically ill leptospirosis patients upon ICU admission and their potential associations with outcome.

Design: Retrospective observational study including all patients with biologically confirmed leptospirosis admitted to the ICU between January 2014 and December 2022. Subgroups of patients with similar clinical profiles were identified by unsupervised clustering (factor analysis for mixed data and hierarchical clustering on principal components).

Setting: All patients admitted to the ICU of the University Hospital of Guadeloupe on the study period.

Patients: One hundred thirty critically ill patients with confirmed leptospirosis were included.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: At ICU admission, 34% of the patients had acute respiratory failure, and 26% required invasive mechanical ventilation. Shock was observed in 52% of patients, myocarditis in 41%, and neurological involvement in 20%. Unsupervised clustering identified three clusters-"Weil's Disease" (48%), "neurological leptospirosis" (20%), and "multiple organ failure" (32%)-with different ICU courses and outcomes. Myocarditis and neurological involvement were key components for cluster identification and were significantly associated with death in ICU. Other factors associated with mortality included shock, acute respiratory failure, and requiring renal replacement therapy.

Conclusions and relevance: Unsupervised analysis of critically ill patients with leptospirosis revealed three patient clusters with distinct phenotypic characteristics and clinical outcomes. These patients should be carefully screened for neurological involvement and myocarditis at ICU admission.

目的确定重症钩端螺旋体病患者在进入重症监护室时的不同表型及其与预后的潜在关联:设计:回顾性观察研究,包括2014年1月至2022年12月期间入住重症监护室的所有经生物证实的钩端螺旋体病患者。通过无监督聚类(混合数据的因子分析和主成分的分层聚类)确定了具有相似临床特征的患者亚群:研究期间瓜德罗普大学医院重症监护室收治的所有患者:干预措施:无:测量和主要结果入住重症监护室时,34%的患者出现急性呼吸衰竭,26%的患者需要有创机械通气。52%的患者出现休克,41%的患者出现心肌炎,20%的患者出现神经系统受累。无监督聚类确定了三个聚类--"魏氏病"(48%)、"神经系统钩端螺旋体病"(20%)和 "多器官衰竭"(32%)--它们在重症监护室的病程和结果各不相同。心肌炎和神经系统受累是确定集群的关键因素,与在重症监护室的死亡有显著关联。其他与死亡相关的因素包括休克、急性呼吸衰竭和需要肾脏替代治疗:对钩端螺旋体病重症患者的无监督分析显示,有三个患者群具有不同的表型特征和临床结果。这些患者在进入重症监护室时应仔细筛查是否有神经系统受累和心肌炎。
{"title":"Organ Involvement Related to Death in Critically Ill Patients With Leptospirosis: Unsupervised Analysis in a French West Indies ICU.","authors":"Laurent Camous, Jean-David Pommier, Benoît Tressières, Frederic Martino, Mathieu Picardeau, Cecile Loraux, Marc Valette, Hugo Chaumont, Michel Carles, Alexandre Demoule, Sebastien Breurec","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001126","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001126","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify distinct phenotypes of critically ill leptospirosis patients upon ICU admission and their potential associations with outcome.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study including all patients with biologically confirmed leptospirosis admitted to the ICU between January 2014 and December 2022. Subgroups of patients with similar clinical profiles were identified by unsupervised clustering (factor analysis for mixed data and hierarchical clustering on principal components).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>All patients admitted to the ICU of the University Hospital of Guadeloupe on the study period.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>One hundred thirty critically ill patients with confirmed leptospirosis were included.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>At ICU admission, 34% of the patients had acute respiratory failure, and 26% required invasive mechanical ventilation. Shock was observed in 52% of patients, myocarditis in 41%, and neurological involvement in 20%. Unsupervised clustering identified three clusters-\"Weil's Disease\" (48%), \"neurological leptospirosis\" (20%), and \"multiple organ failure\" (32%)-with different ICU courses and outcomes. Myocarditis and neurological involvement were key components for cluster identification and were significantly associated with death in ICU. Other factors associated with mortality included shock, acute respiratory failure, and requiring renal replacement therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Unsupervised analysis of critically ill patients with leptospirosis revealed three patient clusters with distinct phenotypic characteristics and clinical outcomes. These patients should be carefully screened for neurological involvement and myocarditis at ICU admission.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11233108/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141560498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Onset of Prolonged High-Potency Benzodiazepine Use Among ICU Survivors: A Nationwide Cohort Study. 重症监护室幸存者开始长期使用高浓度苯二氮卓类药物:一项全国性队列研究。
Q4 Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-08 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001124
Ann-Charlotte Lindström, Erik von Oelreich, Jesper Eriksson, Mikael Eriksson, Johan Mårtensson, Emma Larsson, Anders Oldner

Objectives: Exposure to critical illness and intensive care may lead to long-term psychologic and physical impairments. To what extent ICU survivors become prolonged users of benzodiazepines after exposure to critical care is not fully explored. This study aimed to describe the extent of onset of prolonged high-potency benzodiazepine use among ICU survivors not using these drugs before admission, identify factors associated with this use, and analyze whether such usage is associated with increased mortality.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Sweden, including all registered ICU admissions between 2010 and 2017.

Patients: ICU patients surviving for at least 3 months, not using high-potency benzodiazepine before admission, were eligible for inclusion.

Interventions: Admission to intensive care.

Measurements and main results: A total of 237,904 patients were screened and 137,647 were included. Of these 5338 (3.9%) became prolonged users of high-potency benzodiazepines after ICU discharge. A peak in high-potency benzodiazepine prescriptions was observed during the first 3 months, followed by sustained usage throughout the follow-up period of 18 months. Prolonged usage was associated with older age, female sex, and a history of both somatic and psychiatric comorbidities, including substance abuse. Additionally, a longer ICU stay, a high estimated mortality rate, and prior consumption of low-potency benzodiazepines were associated with prolonged use. The risk of death between 6 and 18 months post-ICU admission was significantly higher among high-potency benzodiazepine users, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.8 (95% CI, 1.7-2.0; p < 0.001). No differences were noted in causes of death between users and nonusers.

Conclusions: Despite the lack of evidence supporting long-term treatment, prolonged usage of high-potency benzodiazepines 18 months following ICU care was notable and associated with an increased risk of death. Considering the substantial number of ICU admissions, prevention of benzodiazepine misuse may improve long-term outcomes following critical care.

目的:接触危重病和重症监护可能会导致长期的心理和身体损伤。重症监护室幸存者在经历重症监护后在多大程度上会长期使用苯二氮卓类药物尚未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在描述入院前未使用苯二氮卓类药物的 ICU 存活者长期使用高浓度苯二氮卓类药物的程度,确定与使用此类药物相关的因素,并分析使用此类药物是否与死亡率增加有关:设计:回顾性队列研究:瑞典,包括2010年至2017年间所有登记入院的ICU患者:存活至少3个月的ICU患者,入院前未使用过高浓度苯二氮卓类药物:干预措施:入住重症监护室:共筛查了 237904 名患者,纳入 137647 名患者。其中 5338 人(3.9%)在重症监护室出院后长期服用高浓度苯二氮卓类药物。在最初的 3 个月中,高浓度苯二氮卓类药物的处方量达到高峰,随后在 18 个月的随访期间持续使用。长期使用苯二氮卓类药物与年龄较大、性别为女性、躯体和精神并发症病史(包括药物滥用)有关。此外,重症监护室住院时间较长、估计死亡率较高以及之前服用过低效苯并二氮杂卓也与长期用药有关。高浓度苯并二氮杂卓使用者在入院后 6 到 18 个月内的死亡风险明显更高,调整后的危险比为 1.8 (95% CI, 1.7-2.0; p < 0.001)。服用者和非服用者的死亡原因没有差异:尽管缺乏支持长期治疗的证据,但ICU治疗后18个月内长期使用高浓度苯二氮卓类药物的效果显著,且与死亡风险增加有关。考虑到 ICU 的入院人数众多,预防苯二氮卓类药物的滥用可能会改善重症监护后的长期预后。
{"title":"Onset of Prolonged High-Potency Benzodiazepine Use Among ICU Survivors: A Nationwide Cohort Study.","authors":"Ann-Charlotte Lindström, Erik von Oelreich, Jesper Eriksson, Mikael Eriksson, Johan Mårtensson, Emma Larsson, Anders Oldner","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001124","DOIUrl":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001124","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Exposure to critical illness and intensive care may lead to long-term psychologic and physical impairments. To what extent ICU survivors become prolonged users of benzodiazepines after exposure to critical care is not fully explored. This study aimed to describe the extent of onset of prolonged high-potency benzodiazepine use among ICU survivors not using these drugs before admission, identify factors associated with this use, and analyze whether such usage is associated with increased mortality.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Sweden, including all registered ICU admissions between 2010 and 2017.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>ICU patients surviving for at least 3 months, not using high-potency benzodiazepine before admission, were eligible for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Admission to intensive care.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>A total of 237,904 patients were screened and 137,647 were included. Of these 5338 (3.9%) became prolonged users of high-potency benzodiazepines after ICU discharge. A peak in high-potency benzodiazepine prescriptions was observed during the first 3 months, followed by sustained usage throughout the follow-up period of 18 months. Prolonged usage was associated with older age, female sex, and a history of both somatic and psychiatric comorbidities, including substance abuse. Additionally, a longer ICU stay, a high estimated mortality rate, and prior consumption of low-potency benzodiazepines were associated with prolonged use. The risk of death between 6 and 18 months post-ICU admission was significantly higher among high-potency benzodiazepine users, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.8 (95% CI, 1.7-2.0; <i>p</i> < 0.001). No differences were noted in causes of death between users and nonusers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the lack of evidence supporting long-term treatment, prolonged usage of high-potency benzodiazepines 18 months following ICU care was notable and associated with an increased risk of death. Considering the substantial number of ICU admissions, prevention of benzodiazepine misuse may improve long-term outcomes following critical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11233102/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141565373","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Critical care explorations
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1