Pub Date : 2026-02-04DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2026.01.028
Renate Pichler, José Daniel Subiela, Félix Guerrero-Ramos
{"title":"Re: Maria De Santis, Joan Palou Redorta, Hiroyuki Nishiyama, et al. Durvalumab in Combination with BCG for BCG-naive, High-risk, Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (POTOMAC): Final Analysis of a Randomised, Open-label, Phase 3 trial. Lancet 2025;406:2221-34.","authors":"Renate Pichler, José Daniel Subiela, Félix Guerrero-Ramos","doi":"10.1016/j.eururo.2026.01.028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2026.01.028","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94000,"journal":{"name":"European urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146128168","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Re: A Multicenter Randomized Phase II Trial of Lenvatinib plus Everolimus Versus Cabozantinib in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell RCC that Progressed on PD-1 Immune Checkpoint Inhibition (LenCabo).","authors":"Wenhao Xu, Aihetaimujiang Anwaier, Siqi Zhou, Yu Zhu, Hailiang Zhang, Dingwei Ye","doi":"10.1016/j.eururo.2025.11.020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.11.020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94000,"journal":{"name":"European urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145992306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-14DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2026.01.002
Martina Benešová-Schäfer, Uwe Haberkorn, John W Babich
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting strategies in prostate cancer have evolved rapidly from early antibody-based approaches to highly effective diagnostic and therapeutic agents. While PSMA remains a central benchmark in metastatic disease, biological heterogeneity and therapy resistance underscore the need for continued innovation and rational combination strategies.
{"title":"The Discovery of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligands: The Long Road to Changes in Clinical Practice for Prostate Cancer.","authors":"Martina Benešová-Schäfer, Uwe Haberkorn, John W Babich","doi":"10.1016/j.eururo.2026.01.002","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2026.01.002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeting strategies in prostate cancer have evolved rapidly from early antibody-based approaches to highly effective diagnostic and therapeutic agents. While PSMA remains a central benchmark in metastatic disease, biological heterogeneity and therapy resistance underscore the need for continued innovation and rational combination strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94000,"journal":{"name":"European urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145992397","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-31DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.12.022
Pietro Scilipoti, Paolo Zaurito, Mattia Longoni, Maurizio Colecchia, Francesco Montorsi, Andrea Salonia, Chiara Mercinelli, Brigida Maiorano, Andrea Necchi, Alberto Briganti, Marco Moschini
Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy remains the cornerstone for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), but up to 40% of patients experience disease recurrence or progression within 2 yr. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of three phase 3 randomized trials POTOMAC, CREST, and ALBAN; n = 2590) in BCG-naïve high-risk NMIBC disease treated with a combination of BCG and an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). Overall risk of bias was low for all studies. Combination therapy with BCG maintenance was associated with better event-free survival (EFS) in comparison to BCG alone (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-0.99; Q = 3.29, p = 0.2). Using the HR for high-grade recurrence from ALBAN, the pooled estimate was directionally consistent, but not statistically significant (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.58-1.04; Q = 3.94, p = 0.1). Overall survival was comparable between groups (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.67-1.26). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were more frequent with combination therapy (risk ratio [RR] 3.66, 95% CI 2.56-5.24 for BCG induction only; RR 3.97, 95% CI 2.54-6.21 for BCG induction + maintenance). There was a moderate decline in patient-reported quality of life in the ICI + BCG maintenance arms. These findings are supported by moderate-certainty evidence for EFS. BCG monotherapy remains the benchmark for BCG-naïve high-risk NMIBC. ICI addition improves EFS but increases high-grade toxicity, which should prompt cautious and individualized adoption pending mature survival data.
膀胱内卡介苗(BCG)治疗仍然是高风险非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的基础,但高达40%的患者在2年内出现疾病复发或进展。我们对三个3期随机试验POTOMAC、CREST和ALBAN进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析;n = 2590)在BCG-naïve高危NMIBC疾病中使用卡介苗和免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)联合治疗。所有研究的总体偏倚风险均较低。与单独使用卡介苗相比,联合治疗与卡介苗维持具有更好的无事件生存(EFS)(合并风险比[HR] 0.77, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.60-0.99; Q = 3.29, p = 0.2)。使用ALBAN高级别复发的HR,合并估计方向一致,但无统计学意义(HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.58-1.04; Q = 3.94, p = 0.1)。两组间总生存率比较(HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.67-1.26)。≥3级治疗相关不良事件在联合治疗组更为频繁(仅卡介苗诱导组风险比[RR] 3.66, 95% CI 2.56-5.24;卡介苗诱导+维持组风险比[RR] 3.97, 95% CI 2.54-6.21)。在ICI + BCG维持组中,患者报告的生活质量有中度下降。这些发现得到了关于EFS的中等确定性证据的支持。卡介苗单药治疗仍然是BCG-naïve高危NMIBC的基准。添加ICI改善了EFS,但增加了高级别毒性,在成熟的生存数据之前,应谨慎和个性化地采用。
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Checkpoint Inhibitors Combined with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in BCG-naïve High-risk Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Synthesis of Evidence from the ALBAN, CREST, and POTOMAC Trials.","authors":"Pietro Scilipoti, Paolo Zaurito, Mattia Longoni, Maurizio Colecchia, Francesco Montorsi, Andrea Salonia, Chiara Mercinelli, Brigida Maiorano, Andrea Necchi, Alberto Briganti, Marco Moschini","doi":"10.1016/j.eururo.2025.12.022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.12.022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy remains the cornerstone for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), but up to 40% of patients experience disease recurrence or progression within 2 yr. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of three phase 3 randomized trials POTOMAC, CREST, and ALBAN; n = 2590) in BCG-naïve high-risk NMIBC disease treated with a combination of BCG and an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). Overall risk of bias was low for all studies. Combination therapy with BCG maintenance was associated with better event-free survival (EFS) in comparison to BCG alone (pooled hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60-0.99; Q = 3.29, p = 0.2). Using the HR for high-grade recurrence from ALBAN, the pooled estimate was directionally consistent, but not statistically significant (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.58-1.04; Q = 3.94, p = 0.1). Overall survival was comparable between groups (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.67-1.26). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were more frequent with combination therapy (risk ratio [RR] 3.66, 95% CI 2.56-5.24 for BCG induction only; RR 3.97, 95% CI 2.54-6.21 for BCG induction + maintenance). There was a moderate decline in patient-reported quality of life in the ICI + BCG maintenance arms. These findings are supported by moderate-certainty evidence for EFS. BCG monotherapy remains the benchmark for BCG-naïve high-risk NMIBC. ICI addition improves EFS but increases high-grade toxicity, which should prompt cautious and individualized adoption pending mature survival data.</p>","PeriodicalId":94000,"journal":{"name":"European urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145890714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-31DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.12.018
Nikhil Mayor, Anna Silvanto, Greg Shaw, Hashim U Ahmed, Francesca Fiorentino, Mathias Winkler
{"title":"Reply to Gonglin Tang and Hongwei Zhao's Letter to the Editor re: Nikhil Mayor, Alexander Light, Anna Silvanto, et al. IP8-FLUORESCE: A Prospective Paired Cohort Study Evaluating the Diagnostic Accuracy of Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy for Real-time Assessment of Surgical Margins in Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.09.4171.","authors":"Nikhil Mayor, Anna Silvanto, Greg Shaw, Hashim U Ahmed, Francesca Fiorentino, Mathias Winkler","doi":"10.1016/j.eururo.2025.12.018","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.12.018","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94000,"journal":{"name":"European urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145890697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.11.026
Armando Stabile, Giorgio Gandaglia, Arturo Chiti, Francesco Montorsi
{"title":"Re: Ken Herrmann, Jochen Walz, Steven MacLennan, et al. SPARC: The Standardised Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Analysis and Reporting Consensus: A Delphi Analysis. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.08.005.","authors":"Armando Stabile, Giorgio Gandaglia, Arturo Chiti, Francesco Montorsi","doi":"10.1016/j.eururo.2025.11.026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.11.026","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94000,"journal":{"name":"European urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145866904","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.10.026
Gonglin Tang, Hongwei Zhao
{"title":"Re: Nikhil Mayor, Alexander Light, Anna Silvanto, et al. IP8-FLUORESCE: A Prospective Paired Cohort Study Evaluating the Diagnostic Accuracy of Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy for Real-time Assessment of Surgical Margins in Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.09.4171.","authors":"Gonglin Tang, Hongwei Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.eururo.2025.10.026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.10.026","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94000,"journal":{"name":"European urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145866970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-22DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.12.016
Matthew Lee, Daniel D Eun
{"title":"Reply to Nikita Bhatt, Benoit Peyronnet, and Lee Zhao's Letter to the Editor re: Matthew Lee, Michael Lesgart, Connor McPartland, Randall Lee, Daniel D. Eun. Robotic Transvesical Bladder Neck Reconstruction: A Novel Approach to Managing Vesicourethral Anastomotic Stenosis. Eur Urol. 2025;88:519-24.","authors":"Matthew Lee, Daniel D Eun","doi":"10.1016/j.eururo.2025.12.016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.12.016","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94000,"journal":{"name":"European urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145822524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.11.024
Emanuele Messina, Antonella Borrelli, Alessandro Sciarra, Ludovica Laschena, Debora Antonini, David Shaholli, Fabio M Magliocca, Simone Novelli, Daniele Santini, Giuseppe La Torre, Valeria Panebianco
Background and objective: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for prostate cancer (PCa) has limited accuracy, and it is linked to overdiagnosis. The PROSA trial aimed to evaluate whether a contrast-free biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI)-first screening strategy improves the detection of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) as the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes included overall PCa detection, benefit-harm metrics, and cost effectiveness from a health care payer perspective.
Methods: This single-center, randomized controlled trial enrolled 816 asymptomatic men aged 49-69 yr (≥40 yr with a PCa family history). Participants were randomized into two arms: arm A underwent bpMRI regardless of the PSA levels; arm B received bpMRI only if PSA ≥3 ng/ml (or 2.5 ng/ml with a family history). Men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score ≥3 were directed to a targeted biopsy. Imaging and pathology assessors were blinded; csPCa is defined as International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥2. The primary outcomes included csPCa detection, benefit-harm metrics, and cost effectiveness from a health care payer perspective.
Key findings and limitations: Among 759 randomized men, biopsy and csPCa detection rates were higher in arm A (10.8% and 4.6%, respectively) than in arm B (5.2% and 1.8%, respectively), with a relative risk of 2.6 (95% confidence interval 1.1-6.1; p = 0.05) for the csPCa detection rate. Benefit-harm metrics favored the MRI-first strategy, showing higher grade selectivity (1.89 vs 1.75), biopsy efficiency (0.74 vs 0.54), and biopsy avoidance (23.1 vs 11.9). No serious adverse event was recorded. The MRI-first strategy yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €2201.75 per csPCa case detected. Limitations include single-round design and short follow-up.
Conclusions and clinical implications: In this randomized screening trial, a contrast-free MRI-first pathway improved csPCa detection, enhanced benefit-harm metrics, and showed favorable cost effectiveness.
背景和目的:基于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)的前列腺癌(PCa)筛查的准确性有限,并且与过度诊断有关。PROSA试验旨在评估无对比双参数磁共振成像(bpMRI)优先筛查策略是否能改善临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)的检测。次要结果包括总体PCa检测、受益-危害指标和医疗保健支付者角度的成本效益。方法:该单中心随机对照试验纳入816名无症状男性,年龄49-69岁(≥40岁,有前列腺癌家族史)。参与者被随机分为两组:无论PSA水平如何,A组接受bpMRI;B组仅当PSA≥3ng /ml(或有家族史的2.5 ng/ml)时接受bpMRI。前列腺影像学报告和数据系统评分≥3分的男性直接进行靶向活检。影像学和病理评估者采用盲法;csPCa定义为国际泌尿病理学会分级组≥2级。主要结果包括csPCa检测、利益-危害度量和从医疗保健支付者角度来看的成本效益。主要发现和局限性:在759名随机男性中,A组活检和csPCa检出率(分别为10.8%和4.6%)高于B组(分别为5.2%和1.8%),csPCa检出率的相对风险为2.6(95%可信区间为1.1-6.1;p = 0.05)。受益-危害指标倾向于mri优先策略,显示出更高的分级选择性(1.89 vs 1.75)、活检效率(0.74 vs 0.54)和活检避免(23.1 vs 11.9)。无严重不良事件记录。mri优先策略产生的增量成本效益比为每例检测到的csPCa病例2201.75欧元。局限性包括单轮设计和随访时间短。结论和临床意义:在这项随机筛选试验中,无对比mri优先途径改善了csPCa检测,增强了收益-危害指标,并显示出良好的成本效益。
{"title":"Primary Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial (PROSA).","authors":"Emanuele Messina, Antonella Borrelli, Alessandro Sciarra, Ludovica Laschena, Debora Antonini, David Shaholli, Fabio M Magliocca, Simone Novelli, Daniele Santini, Giuseppe La Torre, Valeria Panebianco","doi":"10.1016/j.eururo.2025.11.024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2025.11.024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for prostate cancer (PCa) has limited accuracy, and it is linked to overdiagnosis. The PROSA trial aimed to evaluate whether a contrast-free biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI)-first screening strategy improves the detection of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) as the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes included overall PCa detection, benefit-harm metrics, and cost effectiveness from a health care payer perspective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, randomized controlled trial enrolled 816 asymptomatic men aged 49-69 yr (≥40 yr with a PCa family history). Participants were randomized into two arms: arm A underwent bpMRI regardless of the PSA levels; arm B received bpMRI only if PSA ≥3 ng/ml (or 2.5 ng/ml with a family history). Men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score ≥3 were directed to a targeted biopsy. Imaging and pathology assessors were blinded; csPCa is defined as International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥2. The primary outcomes included csPCa detection, benefit-harm metrics, and cost effectiveness from a health care payer perspective.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Among 759 randomized men, biopsy and csPCa detection rates were higher in arm A (10.8% and 4.6%, respectively) than in arm B (5.2% and 1.8%, respectively), with a relative risk of 2.6 (95% confidence interval 1.1-6.1; p = 0.05) for the csPCa detection rate. Benefit-harm metrics favored the MRI-first strategy, showing higher grade selectivity (1.89 vs 1.75), biopsy efficiency (0.74 vs 0.54), and biopsy avoidance (23.1 vs 11.9). No serious adverse event was recorded. The MRI-first strategy yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €2201.75 per csPCa case detected. Limitations include single-round design and short follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>In this randomized screening trial, a contrast-free MRI-first pathway improved csPCa detection, enhanced benefit-harm metrics, and showed favorable cost effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":94000,"journal":{"name":"European urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145784024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.12.003
Ashesh B Jani, Vishal R Dhere, Subir Goyal, Eduard Schreibmann, Pretesh R Patel, Bruce Hershatter, Joseph W Shelton, Sheela Hanasoge, Nikhil T Sebastian, Sagar A Patel, Raghuveer Halkar, Sherrie Cooper, Bridget Fielder, Olayinka A Abiodun-Ojo, Ismaheel Lawal, Aliza Mushtaq, Viraj A Master, Shreyas S Joshi, Omer Kucuk, Mehmet A Bilen, David M Schuster
Background and objective: In EMPIRE-1, [18F]-fluciclovine positron emission tomography (PET) imaging to guide salvage radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer recurrence after prostatectomy resulted in an improvement in event-free survival (EFS) over conventional imaging alone. The aim of EMPIRE-2 was to explore the impact of RT dose escalation to sites of uptake on PET in comparison to EMPIRE-1.
Methods: EMPIRE-2 was a randomized trial of [18F]-fluciclovine versus [68Ga]-PSMA-11 in a cohort of men with biochemical progression after prostatectomy and negative conventional imaging findings. After stratification, patients were randomized to RT guided by [18F]-fluciclovine PET (arm 1) or [68Ga]-PSMA-11 PET (arm 2). PET findings were used for treatment decisions and for RT dose escalation (≤76.0 Gy to the prostate bed and ≤56.0 Gy to the pelvis). The primary endpoint was 2-yr EFS in comparison to the [18F]-fluciclovine RT arm in EMPIRE-1. The secondary endpoint was a planned EFS comparison for [18F]-fluciclovine versus [68Ga]-PSMA-11 in EMPIRE-2.
Key findings and limitations: In the cohort of 140 patients, 59 randomized to arm 1 patients and 60 randomized to arm 2 completed RT. Median follow-up was 2.6 yr (interquartile range 1.8-4.0). The 2-yr EFS rates were 87% for the overall EMPIRE-2 cohort versus 80% for the EMPIRE-1 comparison cohort (difference 7.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.7-12%; p = 0.01). After propensity score weighting, the corresponding 2-yr EFS rates were 84% versus 73% (difference 11%, 95% CI 3.6-24%; p = 0.01). The 2-yr EFS rates in the EMPIRE-2 study arms were 87% for [18F]-fluciclovine versus 88% for [68Ga]-PSMA-11 (difference 0.7%, 95% CI 0.3-1.3%; p > 0.9).
Conclusions and clinical implications: Use of either [18F]-fluciclovine or [68Ga]-PSMA-11 imaging to guide RT dose escalation to sites of PET uptake in the prostate bed and/or pelvis was associated with an improvement in EFS in comparison to a prior trial without dose escalation.
背景与目的:在empre -1中,[18F]氟氯离子正电子发射断层扫描(PET)成像指导前列腺癌切除术后复发的补救性放疗(RT)比单纯的常规成像提高了无事件生存期(EFS)。与EMPIRE-1相比,EMPIRE-2的目的是探讨RT剂量增加对PET摄取部位的影响。方法:EMPIRE-2是一项随机试验,在前列腺切除术后生化进展且常规影像学阴性的男性队列中使用[18F]-氟氯梵与[68Ga]-PSMA-11。分层后,患者被随机分配到由[18F]-氟氯梵PET(1组)或[68Ga]-PSMA-11 PET(2组)引导的RT组。PET检查结果用于治疗决策和放疗剂量增加(前列腺床≤76.0 Gy,骨盆≤56.0 Gy)。主要终点是与EMPIRE-1研究中[18F]氟氯薇治疗组相比的2年EFS。次要终点是计划在EMPIRE-2中比较[18F]-氟氯薇与[68Ga]-PSMA-11的EFS。主要发现和局限性:在140例患者的队列中,59例随机分到第1组,60例随机分到第2组,完成了随机对照试验。中位随访时间为2.6年(四分位数范围为1.8-4.0)。2年的EFS发生率在整个EMPIRE-2队列中为87%,而在EMPIRE-1对照队列中为80%(差异为7.7%,95%可信区间[CI] 4.7-12%; p = 0.01)。倾向评分加权后,相应的2年EFS发生率为84%对73%(差异11%,95% CI 3.6-24%; p = 0.01)。在EMPIRE-2研究组中,[18F]-氟氯薇的2年EFS发生率为87%,而[68Ga]-PSMA-11的2年EFS发生率为88%(差异为0.7%,95% CI 0.3-1.3%; p > 0.9)。结论和临床意义:与之前没有剂量增加的试验相比,使用[18F]-氟氯薇或[68Ga]-PSMA-11成像引导放射治疗剂量增加到前列腺床和/或骨盆PET摄取部位与EFS改善相关。
{"title":"[<sup>18</sup>F]-Fluciclovine or [<sup>68</sup>Ga]-PSMA-11 Molecular Imaging To Guide Dose Escalation of Salvage Radiotherapy After Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: The EMPIRE-2 Trial.","authors":"Ashesh B Jani, Vishal R Dhere, Subir Goyal, Eduard Schreibmann, Pretesh R Patel, Bruce Hershatter, Joseph W Shelton, Sheela Hanasoge, Nikhil T Sebastian, Sagar A Patel, Raghuveer Halkar, Sherrie Cooper, Bridget Fielder, Olayinka A Abiodun-Ojo, Ismaheel Lawal, Aliza Mushtaq, Viraj A Master, Shreyas S Joshi, Omer Kucuk, Mehmet A Bilen, David M Schuster","doi":"10.1016/j.eururo.2025.12.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.eururo.2025.12.003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>In EMPIRE-1, [<sup>18</sup>F]-fluciclovine positron emission tomography (PET) imaging to guide salvage radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer recurrence after prostatectomy resulted in an improvement in event-free survival (EFS) over conventional imaging alone. The aim of EMPIRE-2 was to explore the impact of RT dose escalation to sites of uptake on PET in comparison to EMPIRE-1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EMPIRE-2 was a randomized trial of [<sup>18</sup>F]-fluciclovine versus [<sup>68</sup>Ga]-PSMA-11 in a cohort of men with biochemical progression after prostatectomy and negative conventional imaging findings. After stratification, patients were randomized to RT guided by [<sup>18</sup>F]-fluciclovine PET (arm 1) or [<sup>68</sup>Ga]-PSMA-11 PET (arm 2). PET findings were used for treatment decisions and for RT dose escalation (≤76.0 Gy to the prostate bed and ≤56.0 Gy to the pelvis). The primary endpoint was 2-yr EFS in comparison to the [<sup>18</sup>F]-fluciclovine RT arm in EMPIRE-1. The secondary endpoint was a planned EFS comparison for [<sup>18</sup>F]-fluciclovine versus [<sup>68</sup>Ga]-PSMA-11 in EMPIRE-2.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>In the cohort of 140 patients, 59 randomized to arm 1 patients and 60 randomized to arm 2 completed RT. Median follow-up was 2.6 yr (interquartile range 1.8-4.0). The 2-yr EFS rates were 87% for the overall EMPIRE-2 cohort versus 80% for the EMPIRE-1 comparison cohort (difference 7.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.7-12%; p = 0.01). After propensity score weighting, the corresponding 2-yr EFS rates were 84% versus 73% (difference 11%, 95% CI 3.6-24%; p = 0.01). The 2-yr EFS rates in the EMPIRE-2 study arms were 87% for [<sup>18</sup>F]-fluciclovine versus 88% for [<sup>68</sup>Ga]-PSMA-11 (difference 0.7%, 95% CI 0.3-1.3%; p > 0.9).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Use of either [<sup>18</sup>F]-fluciclovine or [<sup>68</sup>Ga]-PSMA-11 imaging to guide RT dose escalation to sites of PET uptake in the prostate bed and/or pelvis was associated with an improvement in EFS in comparison to a prior trial without dose escalation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94000,"journal":{"name":"European urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12879884/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145784100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}