Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-06-26DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2367002
Takafumi Hiranaka
Introduction: Interest in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has recently grown. Mobile bearing UKA, in which the bearing is not fixed but rather perfectly conforms with femoral and tibial components and moves completely passively between the femoral and tibial implant, has now been used for approximately half a century.
Areas covered: Alongside the recognized advantages of UKA, the mobile-bearing variant benefits from an extremely low rate of polyethylene wear and tolerable minor malalignment. Revision rates for UKA have been reported to exceed those of total knee arthroplasty, but long-term survival rates and outcomes from mobile-bearing UKA have been found to be satisfactory. In addition to the lateral osteoarthritis and loosening, which are main complications of UKA, bearing dislocation is a specific complication of mobile bearing UKA. Fractures and valgus subsidence are more prevalent than in the cementless UKA. While these continue to be features to be addressed, they have been partially solved.
Expert opinion: Given the manifold benefits of UKA, its application could be extended to a larger patient population. Successful outcomes rely on careful patient selection and the surgeon's extensive familiarity with the procedure. Looking ahead, the incorporation of robotic surgery, already a feature of some fixed-bearing UKAs, might shape the future trajectory of mobile-bearing UKA.
{"title":"Advantages and limitations of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an overview of the literature.","authors":"Takafumi Hiranaka","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2367002","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2367002","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Interest in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has recently grown. Mobile bearing UKA, in which the bearing is not fixed but rather perfectly conforms with femoral and tibial components and moves completely passively between the femoral and tibial implant, has now been used for approximately half a century.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Alongside the recognized advantages of UKA, the mobile-bearing variant benefits from an extremely low rate of polyethylene wear and tolerable minor malalignment. Revision rates for UKA have been reported to exceed those of total knee arthroplasty, but long-term survival rates and outcomes from mobile-bearing UKA have been found to be satisfactory. In addition to the lateral osteoarthritis and loosening, which are main complications of UKA, bearing dislocation is a specific complication of mobile bearing UKA. Fractures and valgus subsidence are more prevalent than in the cementless UKA. While these continue to be features to be addressed, they have been partially solved.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Given the manifold benefits of UKA, its application could be extended to a larger patient population. Successful outcomes rely on careful patient selection and the surgeon's extensive familiarity with the procedure. Looking ahead, the incorporation of robotic surgery, already a feature of some fixed-bearing UKAs, might shape the future trajectory of mobile-bearing UKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"587-600"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141319326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Autologous bone dust can be filled in bone defects to promote effective bone healing but typically it is lost when using suction during surgery. The aim of this study was to develop a novel bone collector that can be used to collect bone chips/dust of varying sizes without changing current surgical procedures.
Research design and methods: This collector was designed to connect to a surgical continuous suction system and comprised a plate filter with a 3 mm hole and featured a taper filter with a mesh size of 0.27 mm for the separation and collection of both coarse and fine bone chips/dust. The bone collector was manufactured using nylon 3D printing and plastic injection with biocompatible materials.
Results: The bone collector functional test revealed high bone chip collection efficiency (93%) with automatic size separation function. Low (3.42%) filtration errors showed that most of the water can be drained smoothly from the bone collector. In clinical usability testing, bone collectors can provide functions demonstrated in in vivo spinal fusion and femoral fracture surgeries with different bone grafting size requirements.
Conclusions: The novel bone collector has been validated as a viable and effective surgical device, offering surgeons an additional option to enhance patient outcomes.
{"title":"Development and verification of a novel bone collector with automatic size separating function for orthopedics surgery.","authors":"Kin-Weng Wong, Hsuan-Wen Wang, Chi-Sheng Chien, Chia-Hsuan Li, Cun-Bin Li, Chun-Li Lin","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2367688","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2367688","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autologous bone dust can be filled in bone defects to promote effective bone healing but typically it is lost when using suction during surgery. The aim of this study was to develop a novel bone collector that can be used to collect bone chips/dust of varying sizes without changing current surgical procedures.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This collector was designed to connect to a surgical continuous suction system and comprised a plate filter with a 3 mm hole and featured a taper filter with a mesh size of 0.27 mm for the separation and collection of both coarse and fine bone chips/dust. The bone collector was manufactured using nylon 3D printing and plastic injection with biocompatible materials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bone collector functional test revealed high bone chip collection efficiency (93%) with automatic size separation function. Low (3.42%) filtration errors showed that most of the water can be drained smoothly from the bone collector. In clinical usability testing, bone collectors can provide functions demonstrated in in vivo spinal fusion and femoral fracture surgeries with different bone grafting size requirements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel bone collector has been validated as a viable and effective surgical device, offering surgeons an additional option to enhance patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"659-666"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141332743","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-05-13DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2353722
Pascal Frederiks, Gianluca Castaldi, Keir McCutcheon, Johan Bennett
Introduction: The introduction of drug-eluting coronary stents (DES) into clinical practice in 2002 represented a major milestone in the treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease. Over the years, significant advances in polymer coating and in antiproliferative agent technology have further improved the safety and clinical performance of newer-generation DES.
Areas covered: Development of platinum chromium (PtCr) alloys with high radial strength and high radiopacity have enabled the design of new, thin-strut, flexible, and highly trackable stent platforms, while simultaneously improving stent visibility. These advances have facilitated complex percutaneous treatment of a diverse population of patients in clinical practice. This review will provide an overview of the evolution in PtCr everolimus-eluting stents from PROMUS Element™ to SYNERGY™ to the recently introduced SYNERGY MEGATRON™. The clinical data will be summarized and put into perspective, especially focusing on the role of the SYNERGY™ and MEGATRON™ platforms in the treatment of complex coronary artery disease and high-risk patients.
Expert opinion: The SYNERGY™ stent demonstrates favorable clinical efficacy and safety outcome data, and whilst the clinical data on MEGATRON™ are sparse, early experience is promising. The specific overexpansion capabilities, visibility, and radial strength of the MEGATRON™ are attractive features for complex coronary interventions.
{"title":"Platinum chromium everolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of (complex) coronary artery disease; from SYNERGY™ to the MEGATRON™.","authors":"Pascal Frederiks, Gianluca Castaldi, Keir McCutcheon, Johan Bennett","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2353722","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2353722","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The introduction of drug-eluting coronary stents (DES) into clinical practice in 2002 represented a major milestone in the treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease. Over the years, significant advances in polymer coating and in antiproliferative agent technology have further improved the safety and clinical performance of newer-generation DES.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Development of platinum chromium (PtCr) alloys with high radial strength and high radiopacity have enabled the design of new, thin-strut, flexible, and highly trackable stent platforms, while simultaneously improving stent visibility. These advances have facilitated complex percutaneous treatment of a diverse population of patients in clinical practice. This review will provide an overview of the evolution in PtCr everolimus-eluting stents from PROMUS Element™ to SYNERGY™ to the recently introduced SYNERGY MEGATRON™. The clinical data will be summarized and put into perspective, especially focusing on the role of the SYNERGY™ and MEGATRON™ platforms in the treatment of complex coronary artery disease and high-risk patients.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The SYNERGY™ stent demonstrates favorable clinical efficacy and safety outcome data, and whilst the clinical data on MEGATRON™ are sparse, early experience is promising. The specific overexpansion capabilities, visibility, and radial strength of the MEGATRON™ are attractive features for complex coronary interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"601-611"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140893082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-06-12DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2367007
Triwiyanto Triwiyanto, I Putu Alit Pawana, Achmad Rizal
{"title":"Letter to the editor in response to: A profile on the WISE cortical strip for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.","authors":"Triwiyanto Triwiyanto, I Putu Alit Pawana, Achmad Rizal","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2367007","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2367007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"559-560"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141302300","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-06-26DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2370820
Yishai Valter, Fabio Rapallo, Bruno Burlando, Miah Crossen, Chris Baeken, Abhishek Datta, Choi Deblieck
Introduction: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are increasingly used for major depressive disorder (MDD). Most tDCS and rTMS studies target the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, either with or without neuronavigation. We examined the effect of rTMS and tDCS, and the added value of neuronavigation in the treatment of MDD.
Methods: A search on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for rTMS or tDCS randomized controlled trials of MDD up to 1 February 2023, yielded 89 studies. We then performed meta-analyses comparing tDCS efficacy to non-neuronavigated rTMS, tDCS to neuronavigated rTMS, and neuronavigated rTMS to non-neuronavigated rTMS. We assessed the significance of the effect in subgroups and in the whole meta-analysis with a z-test and subgroup differences with a chi-square test.
Results: We found small-to-medium effects of both tDCS and rTMS on MDD, with a slightly greater effect from rTMS. No significant difference was found between neuronavigation and non-neuronavigation.
Conclusion: Although both tDCS and rTMS are effective in treating MDD, many patients do not respond. Additionally, current neuronavigation methods are not significantly improving MDD treatment. It is therefore imperative to seek personalized methods for these interventions.
{"title":"Efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation and neuronavigation for major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yishai Valter, Fabio Rapallo, Bruno Burlando, Miah Crossen, Chris Baeken, Abhishek Datta, Choi Deblieck","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2370820","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2370820","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are increasingly used for major depressive disorder (MDD). Most tDCS and rTMS studies target the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, either with or without neuronavigation. We examined the effect of rTMS and tDCS, and the added value of neuronavigation in the treatment of MDD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for rTMS or tDCS randomized controlled trials of MDD up to 1 February 2023, yielded 89 studies. We then performed meta-analyses comparing tDCS efficacy to non-neuronavigated rTMS, tDCS to neuronavigated rTMS, and neuronavigated rTMS to non-neuronavigated rTMS. We assessed the significance of the effect in subgroups and in the whole meta-analysis with a z-test and subgroup differences with a chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found small-to-medium effects of both tDCS and rTMS on MDD, with a slightly greater effect from rTMS. No significant difference was found between neuronavigation and non-neuronavigation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although both tDCS and rTMS are effective in treating MDD, many patients do not respond. Additionally, current neuronavigation methods are not significantly improving MDD treatment. It is therefore imperative to seek personalized methods for these interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"643-658"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141433608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-07-23DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2374761
Jette Bloemberg, Martijn de Vries, Luigi A M J G van Riel, Theo M de Reijke, Aimée Sakes, Paul Breedveld, John J van den Dobbelsteen
Introduction: This study focuses on the quantification of and current guidelines on the hazards related to needle positioning in prostate cancer treatment: (1) access restrictions to the prostate gland by the pubic arch, so-called Pubic Arch Interference (PAI) and (2) needle positioning errors. Next, we propose solution strategies to mitigate these hazards.
Methods: The literature search was executed in the Embase, Medline ALL, Web of Science Core Collection*, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases.
Results: The literature search resulted in 50 included articles. PAI was reported in patients with various prostate volumes. The level of reported PAI varied between 0 and 22.3 mm, depending on the patient's position and the measuring method. Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy induced the largest reported misplacement errors, especially in the cranio-caudal direction (up to 10 mm) and the largest displacement errors were reported for High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy in the cranio-caudal direction (up to 47 mm), generally increasing over time.
Conclusions: Current clinical guidelines related to prostate volume, needle positioning accuracy, and maximum allowable PAI are ambiguous, and compliance in the clinical setting differs between institutions. Solutions, such as steerable needles, assist in mitigating the hazards and potentially allow the physician to proceed with the procedure.This systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered at Protocols.io (DOI: dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.6qpvr89eplmk/v1).
导言:本研究的重点是前列腺癌治疗中针头定位相关危害的量化和现行指南:(1)耻骨弓对前列腺的进入限制,即所谓的耻骨弓干扰(PAI);(2)针头定位误差。接下来,我们提出了减轻这些危害的解决策略:方法:在 Embase、Medline ALL、Web of Science Core Collection* 和 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 数据库中进行文献检索:结果:文献检索共收录了 50 篇文章。据报道,PAI适用于不同前列腺体积的患者。根据患者的体位和测量方法,报告的 PAI 水平在 0 到 22.3 毫米之间。低剂量近距离治疗引起的位移误差最大,尤其是在颅尾方向(高达10毫米),而高剂量率近距离治疗在颅尾方向的位移误差最大(高达47毫米),并且随着时间的推移普遍增加:结论:目前与前列腺体积、针定位精度和最大允许 PAI 相关的临床指南并不明确,不同机构在临床环境中的合规性也不尽相同。可转向针等解决方案有助于减轻危害,并有可能让医生继续进行手术。本综述在 Protocols.io 上注册(DOI:dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.6qpvr89eplmk/v1)。
{"title":"Therapeutic prostate cancer interventions: a systematic review on pubic arch interference and needle positioning errors.","authors":"Jette Bloemberg, Martijn de Vries, Luigi A M J G van Riel, Theo M de Reijke, Aimée Sakes, Paul Breedveld, John J van den Dobbelsteen","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2374761","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2374761","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study focuses on the quantification of and current guidelines on the hazards related to needle positioning in prostate cancer treatment: (1) access restrictions to the prostate gland by the pubic arch, so-called Pubic Arch Interference (PAI) and (2) needle positioning errors. Next, we propose solution strategies to mitigate these hazards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature search was executed in the Embase, Medline ALL, Web of Science Core Collection*, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature search resulted in 50 included articles. PAI was reported in patients with various prostate volumes. The level of reported PAI varied between 0 and 22.3 mm, depending on the patient's position and the measuring method. Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy induced the largest reported misplacement errors, especially in the cranio-caudal direction (up to 10 mm) and the largest displacement errors were reported for High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy in the cranio-caudal direction (up to 47 mm), generally increasing over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current clinical guidelines related to prostate volume, needle positioning accuracy, and maximum allowable PAI are ambiguous, and compliance in the clinical setting differs between institutions. Solutions, such as steerable needles, assist in mitigating the hazards and potentially allow the physician to proceed with the procedure.This systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered at Protocols.io (DOI: dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.6qpvr89eplmk/v1).</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"625-641"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141473847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-06-24DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2370827
Stephe Kamalathasan, Maria Paton, John Gierula, Sam Straw, Klaus K Witte
Introduction: While supported by robust evidence and decades of clinical experience, right ventricular apical pacing for bradycardia is associated with a risk of progressive left ventricular dysfunction. Cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction can result in limited electrical resynchronization due to anatomical constraints and epicardial stimulation. In both settings, directly stimulating the conduction system below the atrio-ventricular node (either the bundle of His or the left bundle branch area) has potential to overcome these limitations. Conduction system pacing has met with considerable enthusiasm in view of the more physiological electrical conduction pattern, is rapidly becoming the preferred option of pacing for bradycardia, and is gaining momentum as an alternative to conventional biventricular pacing.
Areas covered: This article provides a review of the current efficacy and safety data for both people requiring treatment for bradycardia and the management of heart failure with conduction delay and discusses the possible future roles for conduction system pacing in routine clinical practice.
Expert opinion: Conduction system pacing might be the holy grail of pacemaker therapy without the disadvantages of current approaches. However, hypothesis and enthusiasm are no match for robust data, demonstrating at least equivalent efficacy and safety to standard approaches.
{"title":"Is conduction system pacing a panacea for pacemaker therapy?","authors":"Stephe Kamalathasan, Maria Paton, John Gierula, Sam Straw, Klaus K Witte","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2370827","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2370827","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While supported by robust evidence and decades of clinical experience, right ventricular apical pacing for bradycardia is associated with a risk of progressive left ventricular dysfunction. Cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction can result in limited electrical resynchronization due to anatomical constraints and epicardial stimulation. In both settings, directly stimulating the conduction system below the atrio-ventricular node (either the bundle of His or the left bundle branch area) has potential to overcome these limitations. Conduction system pacing has met with considerable enthusiasm in view of the more physiological electrical conduction pattern, is rapidly becoming the preferred option of pacing for bradycardia, and is gaining momentum as an alternative to conventional biventricular pacing.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This article provides a review of the current efficacy and safety data for both people requiring treatment for bradycardia and the management of heart failure with conduction delay and discusses the possible future roles for conduction system pacing in routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Conduction system pacing might be the holy grail of pacemaker therapy without the disadvantages of current approaches. However, hypothesis and enthusiasm are no match for robust data, demonstrating at least equivalent efficacy and safety to standard approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"613-623"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346388/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141447872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-06DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2364821
Adusumilli Pramod Kumar, Jyothi S, Kavya A V, Jeesa George
Background: Medical devices play a crucial role in patient care but entail inherent risks, necessitating the presence of materiovigilance to monitor and prevent medical device adverse events (MDAEs). The primary objective of our study is to evaluate the impact of an awareness and sensitization program regarding medical devices among participants.
Methods: A self-administered, validated knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) questionnaire consisting of 15 questions was distributed to study participants, and their responses were collected. The data were analyzed using SPSS software version 18.
Results: Out of the 182 responses received, 56% were from the Pharmacy, while 44% were from the Dental field. 64.8% of the participants were unaware of the Materiovigilance Programme of India (MvPI). However, an overwhelming 97.5% displayed a positive attitude towards reporting MDAEs. Only 5% of the participants had received training on how to report MDAEs. Furthermore, 85.71% of participants had not seen the MDAE reporting form.
Conclusion: To improve the reporting of MDAEs, it is essential to implement educational interventions and provide training to Pharmacy and Dental postgraduate students. These measures will increase awareness and promote better understanding and implementation of materiovigilance practices.
{"title":"Study on the impact of sensitization on materiovigilance programme among pharmacy and dental postgraduate students.","authors":"Adusumilli Pramod Kumar, Jyothi S, Kavya A V, Jeesa George","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2364821","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2364821","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical devices play a crucial role in patient care but entail inherent risks, necessitating the presence of materiovigilance to monitor and prevent medical device adverse events (MDAEs). The primary objective of our study is to evaluate the impact of an awareness and sensitization program regarding medical devices among participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A self-administered, validated knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) questionnaire consisting of 15 questions was distributed to study participants, and their responses were collected. The data were analyzed using SPSS software version 18.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 182 responses received, 56% were from the Pharmacy, while 44% were from the Dental field. 64.8% of the participants were unaware of the Materiovigilance Programme of India (MvPI). However, an overwhelming 97.5% displayed a positive attitude towards reporting MDAEs. Only 5% of the participants had received training on how to report MDAEs. Furthermore, 85.71% of participants had not seen the MDAE reporting form.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To improve the reporting of MDAEs, it is essential to implement educational interventions and provide training to Pharmacy and Dental postgraduate students. These measures will increase awareness and promote better understanding and implementation of materiovigilance practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141249100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-04DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2360979
Bijaya Chettri, Ramya Ravi
Introduction: Medical devices play a crucial role in healthcare, addressing the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of various medical conditions. This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of medical device regulations across nations, considering the economic contexts of diverse countries.
Areas covered: The research involves a comparative examination of medical device regulations, dissecting unique frameworks in countries like the United States (US), European Union (EU), India, and Africa. These nations were chosen based on economic significance, market influence, and regulatory structures. The study aims to achieve a nuanced understanding of global medical device regulation, develop strategies to enhance guidelines, especially in developing nations, and provide recommendations for improvements in relevant regions.
Expert opinion: Through this study, valuable insights are gained into the diverse regulatory frameworks governing medical devices globally. The analysis identifies areas within these frameworks that require improvement, as well as strategies to enhance regulatory guidelines, particularly addressing the specific needs of developing economies. Ultimately, the research provides significant recommendations for policymakers and industry stakeholders. By offering a deeper understanding of regulatory intricacies, this study establishes pragmatic approaches to address challenges within the medical device industry and improve the regulatory landscape on a global scale.
{"title":"A comparative study of medical device regulation between countries based on their economies.","authors":"Bijaya Chettri, Ramya Ravi","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2360979","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2024.2360979","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medical devices play a crucial role in healthcare, addressing the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of various medical conditions. This study conducts a comprehensive analysis of medical device regulations across nations, considering the economic contexts of diverse countries.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The research involves a comparative examination of medical device regulations, dissecting unique frameworks in countries like the United States (US), European Union (EU), India, and Africa. These nations were chosen based on economic significance, market influence, and regulatory structures. The study aims to achieve a nuanced understanding of global medical device regulation, develop strategies to enhance guidelines, especially in developing nations, and provide recommendations for improvements in relevant regions.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Through this study, valuable insights are gained into the diverse regulatory frameworks governing medical devices globally. The analysis identifies areas within these frameworks that require improvement, as well as strategies to enhance regulatory guidelines, particularly addressing the specific needs of developing economies. Ultimately, the research provides significant recommendations for policymakers and industry stakeholders. By offering a deeper understanding of regulatory intricacies, this study establishes pragmatic approaches to address challenges within the medical device industry and improve the regulatory landscape on a global scale.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141238732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}