Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-10-24DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2025.2576586
Victor F A Almeida, Aline Reuter Pimenta, Valentina Lara-Erazo, Deeven Karki, Fabio Rodriguez-Patarroyo, Julia Semeia, Hanna Duncan, Nikolina Filipovic, Derek Meyer, Marcelo Gama de Abreu
Background: Mechanically ventilated patients are at risk of respiratory complications, which may be reduced by proper oral care. The oral cleaning device (Swishkit, Swiftsure, Vancouver, Canada) was developed to facilitate cleansing, moisturization, and debris removal in intubated patients. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and usability of this device in adult intensive care patients.
Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center study at the Cleveland Clinic. Adult patients recovering from cardiac surgery and expected to remain intubated ≥2 hours were included. Feasibility was defined as successful completion of the procedure by nursing staff in addition to standard care. Usability was assessed with the Device Use Questionnaire (DUQ), scored on a 5-point scale (1 = easiest, 2.5 = neutral, 5 = difficult).
Results: Twenty-two patients were enrolled. The procedure was completed in 21/22 (95.5%). One attempt failed due to jaw clenching that prevented device placement, but this patient was included in the analysis. DUQ scores ranged from 1.3 to 2.3, reflecting easy to neutral usability. More than 85% of responses to usability questions were positive, and no residual saline was observed in the subglottic region.
Conclusion: Oral cavity cleansing with the oral cleaning device proved feasible and clinically usable in intubated patients recovering from cardiac surgery.
{"title":"Swiftsure complete care system in intubated adults: a feasibility study.","authors":"Victor F A Almeida, Aline Reuter Pimenta, Valentina Lara-Erazo, Deeven Karki, Fabio Rodriguez-Patarroyo, Julia Semeia, Hanna Duncan, Nikolina Filipovic, Derek Meyer, Marcelo Gama de Abreu","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2576586","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2576586","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mechanically ventilated patients are at risk of respiratory complications, which may be reduced by proper oral care. The oral cleaning device (Swishkit, Swiftsure, Vancouver, Canada) was developed to facilitate cleansing, moisturization, and debris removal in intubated patients. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and usability of this device in adult intensive care patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, single-center study at the Cleveland Clinic. Adult patients recovering from cardiac surgery and expected to remain intubated ≥2 hours were included. Feasibility was defined as successful completion of the procedure by nursing staff in addition to standard care. Usability was assessed with the Device Use Questionnaire (DUQ), scored on a 5-point scale (1 = easiest, 2.5 = neutral, 5 = difficult).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two patients were enrolled. The procedure was completed in 21/22 (95.5%). One attempt failed due to jaw clenching that prevented device placement, but this patient was included in the analysis. DUQ scores ranged from 1.3 to 2.3, reflecting easy to neutral usability. More than 85% of responses to usability questions were positive, and no residual saline was observed in the subglottic region.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Oral cavity cleansing with the oral cleaning device proved feasible and clinically usable in intubated patients recovering from cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05578599.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1265-1270"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145350552","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-23DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2025.2561925
J Choi, C H Park, H Lim, S Kwon, T W Koo, Y Ryu, S Cho, S G Kim, S Lee, H Huh, D K Kim, S Lee, J C Lee
Background: Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) devices are essential for critically ill patients but present significant usability challenges that create use-related risks affecting patient safety. This study applied expert-involved usability engineering to develop a user-centered CRRT device.
Methods: A three-phase study engaged 233 experts: Phase 1 assessed user needs through an online survey (n = 204) identifying use-related risks. Phase 2 developed and iteratively refined a CRRT prototype through expert review (n = 8) and heuristic evaluation (n = 5). Phase 3 validated the final prototype with ICU nurses (n = 16) through task performance in simulated ICU environments. Main outcomes included user satisfaction scores and use error observations.
Results: Phase 1 identified user needs and use-related risks, which were translated into user interface requirements. The initial prototype was developed and refined after iterative usability tests. The final prototype demonstrated high satisfaction scores: Overall User Experience 4.29 ± 0.53, Ease of Use 4.23 ± 0.50, and Comparative Assessment 3.56 ± 0.72. The validation test confirmed effective mitigation of use-related risks. Eight use errors and 48 use difficulties were identified for further refinement.
Conclusions: Systematic expert involvement in usability engineering successfully developed a CRRT device that effectively mitigated use-related risks while achieving high user satisfaction, demonstrating the value of expert integration in medical device development.
{"title":"Expert-involved continuous renal replacement therapy device development: addressing user needs through human factors engineering.","authors":"J Choi, C H Park, H Lim, S Kwon, T W Koo, Y Ryu, S Cho, S G Kim, S Lee, H Huh, D K Kim, S Lee, J C Lee","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2561925","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2561925","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) devices are essential for critically ill patients but present significant usability challenges that create use-related risks affecting patient safety. This study applied expert-involved usability engineering to develop a user-centered CRRT device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-phase study engaged 233 experts: Phase 1 assessed user needs through an online survey (<i>n</i> = 204) identifying use-related risks. Phase 2 developed and iteratively refined a CRRT prototype through expert review (<i>n</i> = 8) and heuristic evaluation (<i>n</i> = 5). Phase 3 validated the final prototype with ICU nurses (<i>n</i> = 16) through task performance in simulated ICU environments. Main outcomes included user satisfaction scores and use error observations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Phase 1 identified user needs and use-related risks, which were translated into user interface requirements. The initial prototype was developed and refined after iterative usability tests. The final prototype demonstrated high satisfaction scores: Overall User Experience 4.29 ± 0.53, Ease of Use 4.23 ± 0.50, and Comparative Assessment 3.56 ± 0.72. The validation test confirmed effective mitigation of use-related risks. Eight use errors and 48 use difficulties were identified for further refinement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Systematic expert involvement in usability engineering successfully developed a CRRT device that effectively mitigated use-related risks while achieving high user satisfaction, demonstrating the value of expert integration in medical device development.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1243-1256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145071220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-22DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2025.2563619
Marie Lamberigts, Bert Sarrazin, Delphine Szecel, Filip Rega, Peter Verbrugghe, Christophe Dubois, Bart Meuris
Background: The goal of this study is to perform a propensity score matched analysis of sutureless AVR and TAVR to compare patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes including hemodynamic performance.
Methods: Patients treated with either sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR) using PercevalTM or transcatheter aortic valve replacement between October 2017 and June 2022 were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to limit the bias in a non-randomized study.
Results: After PSM, 118 pairs of patients were obtained. The in-hospital mortality rate was 0% in SU-AVR and 4.2% in TAVR (p = 0.063). Postoperative complication rates including disabling stroke (0% vs 2.5%, p = 0.250), new need for dialysis (1.7% vs 0%, p = 0.500), and permanent pacemaker implantation at 30 days (5.9% vs 10.2%, p = 0.332) showed no statistical difference. At discharge, TAVR showed significantly lower peak and mean gradients, while paravalvular leakage higher than 1/4 was significantly higher in TAVR (11% vs 0%, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: TAVR offers significantly better transprosthetic gradients, shorter ICU and hospital stays, and less need for postoperative dialysis. Surgery using a sutureless valve showed less paravalvular leakage.
背景:本研究的目的是对无缝线AVR和TAVR进行倾向评分匹配分析,以比较患者特征和术后结果,包括血流动力学表现。方法:纳入2017年10月至2022年6月期间使用PercevalTM进行无缝线主动脉瓣置换术(SU-AVR)或经导管主动脉瓣置换术的患者。倾向评分匹配(PSM)用于限制非随机研究的偏倚。结果:经PSM治疗,获得118对患者。SU-AVR组住院死亡率为0%,TAVR组为4.2% (p = 0.063)。术后并发症发生率包括致残性卒中(0% vs 2.5%, p = 0.250)、新需要透析(1.7% vs 0%, p = 0.500)和30天永久性起搏器植入(5.9% vs 10.2%, p = 0.332),差异无统计学意义。出院时,TAVR的峰值和平均梯度明显降低,而高于1/4的瓣旁漏明显高于TAVR (11% vs 0%, p)。结论:TAVR具有明显更好的经假体梯度,缩短ICU和住院时间,减少术后透析需求。无缝合线瓣膜手术显示瓣旁渗漏较少。
{"title":"Sutureless versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement: propensity matched analysis.","authors":"Marie Lamberigts, Bert Sarrazin, Delphine Szecel, Filip Rega, Peter Verbrugghe, Christophe Dubois, Bart Meuris","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2563619","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2563619","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The goal of this study is to perform a propensity score matched analysis of sutureless AVR and TAVR to compare patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes including hemodynamic performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients treated with either sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR) using Perceval<sup>TM</sup> or transcatheter aortic valve replacement between October 2017 and June 2022 were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to limit the bias in a non-randomized study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, 118 pairs of patients were obtained. The in-hospital mortality rate was 0% in SU-AVR and 4.2% in TAVR (<i>p</i> = 0.063). Postoperative complication rates including disabling stroke (0% vs 2.5%, <i>p</i> = 0.250), new need for dialysis (1.7% vs 0%, <i>p</i> = 0.500), and permanent pacemaker implantation at 30 days (5.9% vs 10.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.332) showed no statistical difference. At discharge, TAVR showed significantly lower peak and mean gradients, while paravalvular leakage higher than 1/4 was significantly higher in TAVR (11% vs 0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TAVR offers significantly better transprosthetic gradients, shorter ICU and hospital stays, and less need for postoperative dialysis. Surgery using a sutureless valve showed less paravalvular leakage.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1271-1278"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145088631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-10-15DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2025.2566741
Bharat Gurnani, Kirandeep Kaur
Introduction: Rural populations bear a disproportionate burden of preventable vision loss due to scant ophthalmic resources, long travel distances, and delayed diagnoses of vision-threatening conditions such as diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, and age-related macular degeneration. Teleophthalmology, leveraging portable imaging devices, data connectivity, and remote interpretation, offers a critical solution by bringing diagnostic capabilities to underserved communities and enabling earlier intervention before irreversible vision loss occurs.
Areas covered: This report reviews the evolution and performance of handheld fundus cameras and smartphone-based adapters for ophthalmic imaging, as well as portable and home-based OCT systems for high-resolution structural assessment. We summarize key studies that validate device accuracy and examine artificial intelligence algorithms that autonomously grade retinal images with regulatory clearance. We also discuss implementation challenges, including infrastructure gaps, image-quality limitations, cost-utility data, and outline strategies such as hybrid AI-expert workflows, federated learning, and integration of tele-eye care into existing public health programs.
Expert opinion: Teleophthalmology devices have matured into reliable tools that can democratize eye care. Their success depends on robust digital infrastructure, rigorous device and algorithm validation, and sustainable financing models. Investment in local training, community engagement, and interoperable referral networks is crucial for translating technological advances into meaningful reductions in rural vision impairment.
{"title":"Teleophthalmology-enabled devices: bridging the gap in rural eye care.","authors":"Bharat Gurnani, Kirandeep Kaur","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2566741","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2566741","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rural populations bear a disproportionate burden of preventable vision loss due to scant ophthalmic resources, long travel distances, and delayed diagnoses of vision-threatening conditions such as diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, and age-related macular degeneration. Teleophthalmology, leveraging portable imaging devices, data connectivity, and remote interpretation, offers a critical solution by bringing diagnostic capabilities to underserved communities and enabling earlier intervention before irreversible vision loss occurs.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This report reviews the evolution and performance of handheld fundus cameras and smartphone-based adapters for ophthalmic imaging, as well as portable and home-based OCT systems for high-resolution structural assessment. We summarize key studies that validate device accuracy and examine artificial intelligence algorithms that autonomously grade retinal images with regulatory clearance. We also discuss implementation challenges, including infrastructure gaps, image-quality limitations, cost-utility data, and outline strategies such as hybrid AI-expert workflows, federated learning, and integration of tele-eye care into existing public health programs.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Teleophthalmology devices have matured into reliable tools that can democratize eye care. Their success depends on robust digital infrastructure, rigorous device and algorithm validation, and sustainable financing models. Investment in local training, community engagement, and interoperable referral networks is crucial for translating technological advances into meaningful reductions in rural vision impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1167-1172"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145133104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-25DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2025.2566746
Stephen Gilbert
{"title":"Securing the internet of medical things in remote patient monitoring and the hospital at home: an interview with Stephen Gilbert.","authors":"Stephen Gilbert","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2566746","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2566746","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1155-1157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145139814","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) wearable device offers a noninvasive, non-pharmacological option for migraine management, but its role in Indian healthcare remains unexplored.
Research design and methods: This retrospective, observational, real-world analysis included patients prescribed REN (Nerivio®) by neurologists across India. Deidentified data were collected via the Portea Medical patient support program, with a three-month follow-up. The primary outcome assessed the effectiveness and safety of the device. Secondary outcomes included changes in headache frequency and medication regimes.
Results: The study population included 1033 patients (mean [SD] age: 38.8 [13] years; 74.8% female; 84.6% with chronic migraine). At two hours post-treatment with REN, 57.3% reported pain relief, 29.4% achieved pain freedom, 47.1% experienced relief from functional disability, and 26.1% reported complete freedom from functional disability. At three months, 70.3% found REN effective. The mean visual analog scale score for pain severity decreased by 2.3 units (p < 0.001). No adverse events occurred in 38.7% of patients. REN usage significantly reduced monthly headache days, frequency of oral medication use, and medicine dosage.
Conclusion: REN is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated non-pharmacological option for migraine management in India. However, long-term studies are necessary to extend these findings across diverse populations.
{"title":"Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of a remote electrical neuromodulation wearable device in treating chronic and episodic migraine: a retrospective, observational real-world evidence from India.","authors":"Sujeet Narayan Charugulla, Mayank Ravindra Dhore, Alit Stark-Inbar, Bhavesh Prabhudas Kotak, Sukhpreet Singh","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2566742","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2566742","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) wearable device offers a noninvasive, non-pharmacological option for migraine management, but its role in Indian healthcare remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational, real-world analysis included patients prescribed REN (Nerivio®) by neurologists across India. Deidentified data were collected via the Portea Medical patient support program, with a three-month follow-up. The primary outcome assessed the effectiveness and safety of the device. Secondary outcomes included changes in headache frequency and medication regimes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study population included 1033 patients (mean [SD] age: 38.8 [13] years; 74.8% female; 84.6% with chronic migraine). At two hours post-treatment with REN, 57.3% reported pain relief, 29.4% achieved pain freedom, 47.1% experienced relief from functional disability, and 26.1% reported complete freedom from functional disability. At three months, 70.3% found REN effective. The mean visual analog scale score for pain severity decreased by 2.3 units (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No adverse events occurred in 38.7% of patients. REN usage significantly reduced monthly headache days, frequency of oral medication use, and medicine dosage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>REN is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated non-pharmacological option for migraine management in India. However, long-term studies are necessary to extend these findings across diverse populations.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (CTRI/2024/11/076750).</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1257-1263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145188139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-23DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2025.2564356
Anju Gupta, Nitin Choudhary
{"title":"Visual standardisation of airway devices: can universal colour coding improve outcomes in time-critical settings?","authors":"Anju Gupta, Nitin Choudhary","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2564356","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2564356","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1159-1161"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145082971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-11DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2025.2560666
Chonyang Albert, Jagpreet S Grewal, Maya Guglin
{"title":"How can we improve patient access to LVAD therapy?","authors":"Chonyang Albert, Jagpreet S Grewal, Maya Guglin","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2560666","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2560666","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1163-1165"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145031557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-13DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2025.2560660
Rohit Kumar, Janakarajan Ramkumar, Mohan Gurjar, Siddharth Rai
Introduction: The World Health Organization (WHO) reported in 2023 that approximately 1.3 billion people, or 16% of the global population, are living with a disability. Among these, locomotor disabilities constitute a significant portion, underscoring the urgent need for devices that enhance mobility and support daily living. The growing demand for assistive devices highlights the critical importance of tools that foster independence and improve overall health and well-being for individuals with mobility impairments.
Area covered: This review provides an update on the existing locomotor assistive devices (LADs), exploring their applications, benefits, limitations, and areas where further advancements are necessary. Special attention is given to hybrid assistive devices, a recent innovation that integrates mobility aids, transfer systems, and rehabilitation tools into a unified platform.
Expert opinion: The LADs, particularly hybrid devices, not only promote user autonomy but also alleviate the caregiver demands. Additionally, this review also suggests areas for future research and development, focusing on improving the accessibility, usability, and affordability of LADs to enhance the quality of life for individuals with locomotor disabilities.
{"title":"Locomotors disability assistive devices for frail persons: An update with focus on advancement in hybrid assistive devices.","authors":"Rohit Kumar, Janakarajan Ramkumar, Mohan Gurjar, Siddharth Rai","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2560660","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2560660","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The World Health Organization (WHO) reported in 2023 that approximately 1.3 billion people, or 16% of the global population, are living with a disability. Among these, locomotor disabilities constitute a significant portion, underscoring the urgent need for devices that enhance mobility and support daily living. The growing demand for assistive devices highlights the critical importance of tools that foster independence and improve overall health and well-being for individuals with mobility impairments.</p><p><strong>Area covered: </strong>This review provides an update on the existing locomotor assistive devices (LADs), exploring their applications, benefits, limitations, and areas where further advancements are necessary. Special attention is given to hybrid assistive devices, a recent innovation that integrates mobility aids, transfer systems, and rehabilitation tools into a unified platform.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The LADs, particularly hybrid devices, not only promote user autonomy but also alleviate the caregiver demands. Additionally, this review also suggests areas for future research and development, focusing on improving the accessibility, usability, and affordability of LADs to enhance the quality of life for individuals with locomotor disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1215-1229"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145034961","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-10-14DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2025.2561918
Shivani Shah, Priyanka Thakor, Aakash Shah, Om V Singh
Introduction: The integration of software into medical devices has profoundly transformed the healthcare landscape, enabling precise diagnostics, personalized treatment , and remote patient monitoring. The rapid pace of software development - especially with artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) - demands regulatory frameworks to ensure patient safety, effectiveness, and reliability.
Areas covered: Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) refers to software intended for medical purposes that operates independently of a physical device. This article traces the historical development of regulatory approaches, deconstructs existing frameworks, analyzes challenges and influencing factors, presents case studies, and anticipates future trends. A narrative literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, FDA.gov, EUR-Lex and IMDRF.org, covering materials published between January 2013 and May 2025.
Expert opinion: The Total Product Lifecycle (TPLC) framework is essential for managing evolving risks and performance of AI/ML-based SaMD. These technologies are redefining regulatory assumptions, requiring systems that ensure transparency, mitigate bias, sustain trust, and promote equitable, safe innovation.
{"title":"Software as Medical Devices: requirements and regulatory landscape in the United States.","authors":"Shivani Shah, Priyanka Thakor, Aakash Shah, Om V Singh","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2561918","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2561918","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The integration of software into medical devices has profoundly transformed the healthcare landscape, enabling precise diagnostics, personalized treatment , and remote patient monitoring. The rapid pace of software development - especially with artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) - demands regulatory frameworks to ensure patient safety, effectiveness, and reliability.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) refers to software intended for medical purposes that operates independently of a physical device. This article traces the historical development of regulatory approaches, deconstructs existing frameworks, analyzes challenges and influencing factors, presents case studies, and anticipates future trends. A narrative literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, FDA.gov, EUR-Lex and IMDRF.org, covering materials published between January 2013 and May 2025.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The Total Product Lifecycle (TPLC) framework is essential for managing evolving risks and performance of AI/ML-based SaMD. These technologies are redefining regulatory assumptions, requiring systems that ensure transparency, mitigate bias, sustain trust, and promote equitable, safe innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1201-1214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145066937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}