Pub Date : 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2435546
Gabriele Bignante, Angelo Orsini, Francesco Lasorsa, Luca Lambertini, Matteo Pacini, Daniele Amparore, Savio Domenico Pandolfo, Francesco Del Giudice, Osama Zaytoun, Maurizio Buscarini, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Luigi Schips, Alessandro Veccia, Alessandro Antonelli, Cristian Fiori, Francesco Porpiglia, Riccardo Autorino
Introduction: Recent advancements in single-port surgery, robotic platforms, 3D models and artificial intelligence have transformed surgical procedures, especially in urology. These innovations enhance precision, safety, and efficacy, reducing invasiveness and recovery times. The review focuses on the latest in robotic-assisted surgery for genitourinary cancers, highlighting the shift toward personalized, minimally invasive treatments.
Areas covered: A bibliographic search across PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases focused on the last four years of innovations in robotic surgery for urologic tumors. The review highlights the use of the Da Vinci Single Port robotic system, available robotic platforms worldwide, advancements in 3D virtual models, artificial intelligence in robotic surgery and the application of molecular imaging for assessing primary lymph nodes and treating lymph node metastases and local recurrences in prostate cancer.
Expert opinion: The integration of single-port surgery, new robotic platforms, 3D models and artificial intelligence in urological oncology promises transformative impacts on diagnosis, treatment and cost-effectiveness. Despite benefits like enhanced precision and expanded surgical access, challenges such as high costs, training needs, and technological integration barriers persist. Collaboration and further research are critical to optimize outcomes, improve safety protocols, and ensure equitable global access to these innovations.
{"title":"Robotic-assisted surgery for the treatment of urologic cancers: recent advances.","authors":"Gabriele Bignante, Angelo Orsini, Francesco Lasorsa, Luca Lambertini, Matteo Pacini, Daniele Amparore, Savio Domenico Pandolfo, Francesco Del Giudice, Osama Zaytoun, Maurizio Buscarini, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Luigi Schips, Alessandro Veccia, Alessandro Antonelli, Cristian Fiori, Francesco Porpiglia, Riccardo Autorino","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2435546","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2435546","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recent advancements in single-port surgery, robotic platforms, 3D models and artificial intelligence have transformed surgical procedures, especially in urology. These innovations enhance precision, safety, and efficacy, reducing invasiveness and recovery times. The review focuses on the latest in robotic-assisted surgery for genitourinary cancers, highlighting the shift toward personalized, minimally invasive treatments.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>A bibliographic search across PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases focused on the last four years of innovations in robotic surgery for urologic tumors. The review highlights the use of the Da Vinci Single Port robotic system, available robotic platforms worldwide, advancements in 3D virtual models, artificial intelligence in robotic surgery and the application of molecular imaging for assessing primary lymph nodes and treating lymph node metastases and local recurrences in prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The integration of single-port surgery, new robotic platforms, 3D models and artificial intelligence in urological oncology promises transformative impacts on diagnosis, treatment and cost-effectiveness. Despite benefits like enhanced precision and expanded surgical access, challenges such as high costs, training needs, and technological integration barriers persist. Collaboration and further research are critical to optimize outcomes, improve safety protocols, and ensure equitable global access to these innovations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1165-1177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142775889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-11-24DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2433718
Zelin Niu, Long Cao, Wei Guo, Hongpeng Zhang
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the anatomical feasibility of a novel modular triple-branched endograft for aortic arch diseases.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 314 patients with aortic arch pathologies treated at a single center from January 2018 to December 2023. Preoperative computed tomography angiography images were analyzed with three-dimensional reconstruction to quantify anatomical features. Feasibility was based on endograft anatomical criteria, and logistic regression identified risk factors for unsuitability.
Results: Out of 132 patients included in the study, 67.4% were deemed anatomically suitable for the triple-branched device. A total of 36 (27.3%) patients were deemed inapplicable due to a large diameter of the proximal landing zone, 12 (9%) patients due to a small diameter of the left common carotid artery, and 1 (0.8%) patient due to a small diameter of the left subclavian artery. Logistic regression identified large proximal landing zone diameter and small left common carotid artery diameter were significant factors for unsuitability (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively).
Conclusions: The novel triple-branched endograft demonstrated promising anatomical feasibility in two-thirds of patients. However, anatomical constraints limited its applicability. Future device iterations should focus on accommodating a broader range of anatomical variations.
{"title":"Anatomic feasibility of a novel modular triple-branched endograft for patients with aortic arch pathologies.","authors":"Zelin Niu, Long Cao, Wei Guo, Hongpeng Zhang","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2433718","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2433718","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the anatomical feasibility of a novel modular triple-branched endograft for aortic arch diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted on 314 patients with aortic arch pathologies treated at a single center from January 2018 to December 2023. Preoperative computed tomography angiography images were analyzed with three-dimensional reconstruction to quantify anatomical features. Feasibility was based on endograft anatomical criteria, and logistic regression identified risk factors for unsuitability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 132 patients included in the study, 67.4% were deemed anatomically suitable for the triple-branched device. A total of 36 (27.3%) patients were deemed inapplicable due to a large diameter of the proximal landing zone, 12 (9%) patients due to a small diameter of the left common carotid artery, and 1 (0.8%) patient due to a small diameter of the left subclavian artery. Logistic regression identified large proximal landing zone diameter and small left common carotid artery diameter were significant factors for unsuitability (<i>p</i> < 0.001 and <i>p</i> = 0.002, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel triple-branched endograft demonstrated promising anatomical feasibility in two-thirds of patients. However, anatomical constraints limited its applicability. Future device iterations should focus on accommodating a broader range of anatomical variations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1219-1225"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142712296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-12-05DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2431724
Daniela Mazzaccaro, Francesco Sturla, Antonio Rosato, Paolo Righini, Giovanni Nano
Introduction: Endovascular techniques and materials have significantly expanded their application in the treatment of abdominal and thoraco-abdominal aortic lesions, allowing for the management of increasingly complex pathologies that may require cannulation of target vessels. The treatment of such diseases deserves a particular approach and dedicated materials, for which correct procedural planning is mandatory. In the last decades, the use of 3D printing technology as an assisting tool for preoperative rehearsal of complex cases has progressively widespread.
Areas covered: A review was performed about the use of 3D printing technology for the planning of endovascular repair of complex abdominal and thoraco-abdominal aortic lesions. Also, our experience of planning and simulation of an elective challenging endovascular procedure for a Crawford's type II thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm using a Cook Zenith® T-BranchTM endograft, leveraging a 3D-printed model of the patient-specific anatomy from the aortic arch to the common femoral artery, is herein described.
Expert opinion: The benefits of using 3D printing technologies as an assistive tool in planning complex endovascular repairs of abdominal and thoraco-abdominal aortic lesions have been well-documented in the literature, including their application in urgent cases. However, further research and development are necessary to overcome the current limitations of this potentially highly valuable technology.
导言:血管内技术和材料在治疗腹部和胸腹主动脉病变方面的应用已大大扩展,可治疗可能需要对靶血管进行插管的日益复杂的病症。这类疾病的治疗需要特殊的方法和专用材料,因此必须进行正确的手术规划。在过去的几十年中,3D 打印技术作为复杂病例术前预演的辅助工具已逐渐得到广泛应用:综述了使用 3D 打印技术规划复杂腹部和胸腹主动脉病变的血管内修复手术。此外,本文还介绍了我们利用从主动脉弓到股总动脉的患者特异性解剖3D打印模型,使用Cook Zenith® T-BranchTM内植物对克劳福德II型胸腹主动脉瘤进行选择性高难度血管内手术的规划和模拟经验:专家意见:文献中已充分证实了使用三维打印技术作为辅助工具,规划腹主动脉和胸腹主动脉病变复杂血管内修复的好处,包括在紧急情况下的应用。然而,要克服这项潜在的高价值技术目前存在的局限性,还需要进一步的研究和开发。
{"title":"Planning the use of endografts in the endovascular repair of complex abdominal and thoraco-abdominal aortic lesions leveraging 3D printing.","authors":"Daniela Mazzaccaro, Francesco Sturla, Antonio Rosato, Paolo Righini, Giovanni Nano","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2431724","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2431724","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Endovascular techniques and materials have significantly expanded their application in the treatment of abdominal and thoraco-abdominal aortic lesions, allowing for the management of increasingly complex pathologies that may require cannulation of target vessels. The treatment of such diseases deserves a particular approach and dedicated materials, for which correct procedural planning is mandatory. In the last decades, the use of 3D printing technology as an assisting tool for preoperative rehearsal of complex cases has progressively widespread.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>A review was performed about the use of 3D printing technology for the planning of endovascular repair of complex abdominal and thoraco-abdominal aortic lesions. Also, our experience of planning and simulation of an elective challenging endovascular procedure for a Crawford's type II thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm using a Cook Zenith® T-Branch<sup>TM</sup> endograft, leveraging a 3D-printed model of the patient-specific anatomy from the aortic arch to the common femoral artery, is herein described.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The benefits of using 3D printing technologies as an assistive tool in planning complex endovascular repairs of abdominal and thoraco-abdominal aortic lesions have been well-documented in the literature, including their application in urgent cases. However, further research and development are necessary to overcome the current limitations of this potentially highly valuable technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1121-1130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142650433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2433716
Max Shin, Nikhil Ganjoo, Omar Toubat, Rohan Shad, Pavan Atluri
Introduction: Heart transplantation, the gold standard for end-stage cardiomyopathy, is hindered by donor shortages and clinical deterioration. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have emerged as crucial alternatives, stabilizing hemodynamics, reversing end-organ damage, and enabling patient discharge. Significant engineering advancements and iterative improvements have since produced devices capable of rivaling heart transplantation in early survival potential. This review serves to provide an overview of LVAD technology, an understanding of current device limitations, and preview new technologies being developed to address them.
Areas covered: This manuscript reviews the evolution of LVAD technology, discussing its benefits, drawbacks, and contemporary outcomes. It will detail the progression, current state, and future directions of LVAD technology, emphasizing its pivotal role in managing advanced heart failure.
Expert opinion: The modern day LVAD has significantly extended the lifespan of patients with end-stage heart failure. However, adverse events remain abound and will be the focus of the next generation of devices. A burgeoning pipline of new technologies abound and preview the possibilities of a sustainable solution to a devastating disease.
{"title":"Durable left ventricular assist devices: a contemporary review of their benefits and drawbacks.","authors":"Max Shin, Nikhil Ganjoo, Omar Toubat, Rohan Shad, Pavan Atluri","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2433716","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2433716","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Heart transplantation, the gold standard for end-stage cardiomyopathy, is hindered by donor shortages and clinical deterioration. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have emerged as crucial alternatives, stabilizing hemodynamics, reversing end-organ damage, and enabling patient discharge. Significant engineering advancements and iterative improvements have since produced devices capable of rivaling heart transplantation in early survival potential. This review serves to provide an overview of LVAD technology, an understanding of current device limitations, and preview new technologies being developed to address them.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This manuscript reviews the evolution of LVAD technology, discussing its benefits, drawbacks, and contemporary outcomes. It will detail the progression, current state, and future directions of LVAD technology, emphasizing its pivotal role in managing advanced heart failure.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The modern day LVAD has significantly extended the lifespan of patients with end-stage heart failure. However, adverse events remain abound and will be the focus of the next generation of devices. A burgeoning pipline of new technologies abound and preview the possibilities of a sustainable solution to a devastating disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1111-1120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142775793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2442485
Benjamin R Hauser, Mina Estafanos, Kamal S Ayyat, James J Yun, Haytham Elgharably
Introduction: Recently, there has been growing experience with utilizing a veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (VA ECMO) routinely during lung transplantation procedures. Yet, there is a lack of consensus on the protocols, benefits, and outcomes of routine VA ECMO use in lung transplantation.
Areas covered: This article presents an overview of the current status of routine use of VA ECMO during lung transplantation, including rationale, protocols, applications, and outcomes.
Expert opinion: Utilization of VA ECMO during lung transplantation has emerged as an alternative mechanical circulatory support modality to cardiopulmonary bypass, with growing evidence showing lower rates of peri-operative complications. Some groups took that further into routine application of VA ECMO during lung transplantation. The current available evidence suggests that routine utilization of VA ECMO during lung transplantation is associated with lower rates of primary graft dysfunction and improved early outcomes. Use of VA ECMO allows controlled reperfusion of the allograft and avoids an unplanned "crash" on pump in case of hemodynamic instability, which carries worse outcomes after lung transplantation. As a relatively new approach, further follow-up of growing experience, as well as prospective clinical trials, is necessary to develop a consensus about routine utilization of VA ECMO during lung transplantation.
简介最近,在肺移植手术中常规使用静脉-动脉体外膜氧合器(VA ECMO)的经验越来越多。然而,对于在肺移植手术中常规使用 VA ECMO 的方案、益处和结果还缺乏共识:本文概述了肺移植过程中常规使用 VA ECMO 的现状,包括原理、方案、应用和结果:在肺移植过程中使用 VA ECMO 已成为心肺旁路手术之外的另一种机械循环支持方式,越来越多的证据显示其围术期并发症发生率较低。一些研究小组将其进一步发展为肺移植期间 VA ECMO 的常规应用。现有证据表明,在肺移植过程中常规使用 VA ECMO 可降低原发性移植物功能障碍的发生率,改善早期预后。使用 VA ECMO 可以控制异体移植物的再灌注,避免在血流动力学不稳定的情况下泵意外 "崩溃",而这种情况会导致肺移植术后效果更差。作为一种相对较新的方法,有必要进一步跟踪不断积累的经验,并进行前瞻性临床试验,以便就肺移植期间常规使用 VA ECMO 达成共识。
{"title":"Current status of routine use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during lung transplantation.","authors":"Benjamin R Hauser, Mina Estafanos, Kamal S Ayyat, James J Yun, Haytham Elgharably","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2442485","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2442485","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recently, there has been growing experience with utilizing a veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (VA ECMO) routinely during lung transplantation procedures. Yet, there is a lack of consensus on the protocols, benefits, and outcomes of routine VA ECMO use in lung transplantation.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This article presents an overview of the current status of routine use of VA ECMO during lung transplantation, including rationale, protocols, applications, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Utilization of VA ECMO during lung transplantation has emerged as an alternative mechanical circulatory support modality to cardiopulmonary bypass, with growing evidence showing lower rates of peri-operative complications. Some groups took that further into routine application of VA ECMO during lung transplantation. The current available evidence suggests that routine utilization of VA ECMO during lung transplantation is associated with lower rates of primary graft dysfunction and improved early outcomes. Use of VA ECMO allows controlled reperfusion of the allograft and avoids an unplanned \"crash\" on pump in case of hemodynamic instability, which carries worse outcomes after lung transplantation. As a relatively new approach, further follow-up of growing experience, as well as prospective clinical trials, is necessary to develop a consensus about routine utilization of VA ECMO during lung transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1153-1163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142819979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-12-11DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2439028
Antonio Greco, Marco Spagnolo, Davide Capodanno
{"title":"Stent type selection in high bleeding risk patients.","authors":"Antonio Greco, Marco Spagnolo, Davide Capodanno","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2439028","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2439028","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1061-1066"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142786982","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-12-10DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2438309
Arjun Balachandar, Onanong Phokaewvarangkul, Alfonso Fasano
Introduction: A closed-loop or feedback-control system is a process which considers the system's output in order to automatically adjust the input. Compared to a traditional open-loop system, a closed-loop system allows for a higher degree of accuracy with minimal human intervention. Novel methods of closed loop 'adaptive' deep brain stimulation DBS (aDBS) are being developed.
Areas covered: This review focuses on the current state of aDBS for various neuropsychiatric conditions: common movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease, dystonia, essential tremor, and Tourette syndrome, as well as psychiatric disorders of depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Finally, the future directions of closed-loop neuromodulation treatments are also discussed.
Expert opinion: Recently, aDBS has been shown to offer benefits compared to open-loop DBS. Understanding the biomarkers of pathological states across various disorders is, however, crucial to implementation of aDBS, and improved sensing-capable hardware and advances in machine learning are poised to allow its effective implementation.
{"title":"Closed-loop systems for deep brain stimulation to treat neuropsychiatric disorders.","authors":"Arjun Balachandar, Onanong Phokaewvarangkul, Alfonso Fasano","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2438309","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2438309","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A closed-loop or feedback-control system is a process which considers the system's output in order to automatically adjust the input. Compared to a traditional open-loop system, a closed-loop system allows for a higher degree of accuracy with minimal human intervention. Novel methods of closed loop 'adaptive' deep brain stimulation DBS (aDBS) are being developed.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review focuses on the current state of aDBS for various neuropsychiatric conditions: common movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease, dystonia, essential tremor, and Tourette syndrome, as well as psychiatric disorders of depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Finally, the future directions of closed-loop neuromodulation treatments are also discussed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Recently, aDBS has been shown to offer benefits compared to open-loop DBS. Understanding the biomarkers of pathological states across various disorders is, however, crucial to implementation of aDBS, and improved sensing-capable hardware and advances in machine learning are poised to allow its effective implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1141-1152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142793059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-12-12DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2440599
Xin Xie, Fanyu Huang, Jun Yao, Shifeng Teng, Yi Gao, Lu Chen, Haofei Wang, Wenbin Rui, Wei He, Le Xu, Hai Huang, Hongchao He, Xiaojing Wang, Fukang Sun, Yu Zhu, Zhiqian Hu, Danfeng Xu
Background: The advent of ultrasonic scalpels has remarkably advanced minimally invasive surgery; however, the Chinese market's reliance on imports highlights the urgent need for a cost-effective, efficient, and domestically produced surgical scalpel. This study aimed to compare SanAgileTMSA01 with the Johnson & Johnson GEN11, and HAR36 surgical devices.
Research design and methods: In total, 152 participants requiring urological or general laparoscopic surgery were randomly and equally divided between the two hospitals and randomized to the test and control groups. Clinical outcomes, adverse event rates, intraoperative bleeding, and surgery duration were compared between the two devices.
Results: The clinical application rate of both devices was 100%. There were no significant differences between the two groups in intraoperative bleeding, surgery duration, and incidence of adverse events. In the test group, five device-related adverse events occurred (6.58%), compared to two (2.63%) in the control group (no significant difference). The device-related adverse events did not result in any sequelae.
Conclusions: The clinical performance of the SanAgileTMSA01 was comparable to that of the Johnson & Johnson GEN11 and HAR36. The SanAgileTMSA01 device may serve as a viable alternative ultrasonic surgical tool, thereby providing clinicians with additional options.
Trial registration: Registration number of Shanghai Medical Equipment Preparation 20,190,114.
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of SanAgile<sup>TM</sup>SA01 ultrasonic scalpel and Johnson & Johnson GEN11, and HAR36 for efficacy and safety.","authors":"Xin Xie, Fanyu Huang, Jun Yao, Shifeng Teng, Yi Gao, Lu Chen, Haofei Wang, Wenbin Rui, Wei He, Le Xu, Hai Huang, Hongchao He, Xiaojing Wang, Fukang Sun, Yu Zhu, Zhiqian Hu, Danfeng Xu","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2440599","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2440599","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The advent of ultrasonic scalpels has remarkably advanced minimally invasive surgery; however, the Chinese market's reliance on imports highlights the urgent need for a cost-effective, efficient, and domestically produced surgical scalpel. This study aimed to compare SanAgile<sup>TM</sup>SA01 with the Johnson & Johnson GEN11, and HAR36 surgical devices.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>In total, 152 participants requiring urological or general laparoscopic surgery were randomly and equally divided between the two hospitals and randomized to the test and control groups. Clinical outcomes, adverse event rates, intraoperative bleeding, and surgery duration were compared between the two devices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The clinical application rate of both devices was 100%. There were no significant differences between the two groups in intraoperative bleeding, surgery duration, and incidence of adverse events. In the test group, five device-related adverse events occurred (6.58%), compared to two (2.63%) in the control group (no significant difference). The device-related adverse events did not result in any sequelae.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The clinical performance of the SanAgile<sup>TM</sup>SA01 was comparable to that of the Johnson & Johnson GEN11 and HAR36. The SanAgile<sup>TM</sup>SA01 device may serve as a viable alternative ultrasonic surgical tool, thereby providing clinicians with additional options.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registration number of Shanghai Medical Equipment Preparation 20,190,114.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1211-1217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142808924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-11-12DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2428690
Muhammad Adnan Zaman, Sidra Kalsoom, Lou Mastrine
{"title":"Modular cardiac rhythm management system and results of MODULAR ATP trial: an era of personalized device medicine.","authors":"Muhammad Adnan Zaman, Sidra Kalsoom, Lou Mastrine","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2428690","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2428690","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1077-1080"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142635046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-01Epub Date: 2024-11-29DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2433184
Matti Jubouri, Mohammed Idhrees, Mohamad Bashir
{"title":"Evaluation of custom-made TEVAR device for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection.","authors":"Matti Jubouri, Mohammed Idhrees, Mohamad Bashir","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2433184","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2024.2433184","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1067-1069"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142735284","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}