Pub Date : 2026-01-27DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2026.2621892
Joseph Hajj, Ziad Zalaquett, Serge Harb, Samir Kapadia
Introduction: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has transformed treatment of severe aortic stenosis, offering a less invasive alternative to surgery. Despite advances, stroke remains a serious complication, impacting morbidity, mortality, and long-term cognitive function, thus the need for effective prevention strategies.
Areas covered: Based on a targeted review of the PubMed literature, this review addresses mechanisms and risk factors for stroke after TAVR and evaluates current preventive approaches. Cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPDs), particularly the Sentinel system, are discussed alongside other devices. Antithrombotic strategies before, during, and after TAVR are also reviewed, emphasizing the balance between thromboembolic protection and bleeding risk in an elderly population.
Expert opinion: While some studies suggest CEPDs may reduce stroke, randomized trials have not confirmed broad and robust benefit, and high cost limits routine adoption. Future work should focus on high-risk subgroups, device refinement, and large-scale trials. For now, individualized antithrombotic therapy and selective CEPD use remain central to stroke prevention in TAVR.
{"title":"Anticipating stroke in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.","authors":"Joseph Hajj, Ziad Zalaquett, Serge Harb, Samir Kapadia","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2026.2621892","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2026.2621892","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has transformed treatment of severe aortic stenosis, offering a less invasive alternative to surgery. Despite advances, stroke remains a serious complication, impacting morbidity, mortality, and long-term cognitive function, thus the need for effective prevention strategies.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Based on a targeted review of the PubMed literature, this review addresses mechanisms and risk factors for stroke after TAVR and evaluates current preventive approaches. Cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPDs), particularly the Sentinel system, are discussed alongside other devices. Antithrombotic strategies before, during, and after TAVR are also reviewed, emphasizing the balance between thromboembolic protection and bleeding risk in an elderly population.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>While some studies suggest CEPDs may reduce stroke, randomized trials have not confirmed broad and robust benefit, and high cost limits routine adoption. Future work should focus on high-risk subgroups, device refinement, and large-scale trials. For now, individualized antithrombotic therapy and selective CEPD use remain central to stroke prevention in TAVR.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146032204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-26DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2026.2621010
Yining Zhang, Jamshid H Karimov, Po-Lin Hsu, Tingting Wu, Shu Chen
Introduction: Temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) has become essential in managing severe cardiac dysfunction, particularly refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). Despite widespread adoption, the optimal use of tMCS is often guided by institutional experience rather than robust evidence, leaving questions about device selection and patient outcomes.
Areas covered: We conducted a structured literature review of studies published in major databases (PubMed), using keywords such as intra-aortic balloon pump, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, percutaneous ventricular assist devices, cardiogenic shock, and related terms. Key clinical scenarios reviewed include acute myocardial infarction-related CS, post-cardiotomy shock, and support for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions. We critically examine randomized controlled trials, extensive observational studies, and consensus statements published in the last five years.
Expert opinion: While tMCS has revolutionized the management of CS, its optimal use is still limited by a lack of high-quality evidence, ongoing device-related complications, and economic challenges. Future advancements in device technology, patient stratification, and standardized protocols, alongside continued research and innovation, are essential to improve outcomes and broaden the accessibility.
{"title":"Temporary circulatory support for cardiogenic shock: technology overview and limitations.","authors":"Yining Zhang, Jamshid H Karimov, Po-Lin Hsu, Tingting Wu, Shu Chen","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2026.2621010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2026.2621010","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) has become essential in managing severe cardiac dysfunction, particularly refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). Despite widespread adoption, the optimal use of tMCS is often guided by institutional experience rather than robust evidence, leaving questions about device selection and patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We conducted a structured literature review of studies published in major databases (PubMed), using keywords such as intra-aortic balloon pump, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, percutaneous ventricular assist devices, cardiogenic shock, and related terms. Key clinical scenarios reviewed include acute myocardial infarction-related CS, post-cardiotomy shock, and support for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions. We critically examine randomized controlled trials, extensive observational studies, and consensus statements published in the last five years.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>While tMCS has revolutionized the management of CS, its optimal use is still limited by a lack of high-quality evidence, ongoing device-related complications, and economic challenges. Future advancements in device technology, patient stratification, and standardized protocols, alongside continued research and innovation, are essential to improve outcomes and broaden the accessibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146055615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-02DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2025.2594458
David Oks, Robert D Schaller, Pamela K Mason, Kevin L Sack
Background: Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) adversely impacts mortality and hospitalizations. Transvenous pacemaker and defibrillator leads are associated with worsening TR, underscoring the need for lead designs that minimize adverse tricuspid valve interference.
Method: We developed a physics-based computational model to evaluate the general effect of lead diameter and material stiffness on the regurgitant orifice area (ROA). Additionally, we simulated three commercial transvenous leads, with diameters of 4.7 Fr, 6.8 Fr and 8.6 Fr, and evaluated the induced ROA. Three pre-implant baseline conditions were considered in all cases: no TR, mild TR and moderate TR.
Results: Lead diameter exhibited a predominant effect on ROA compared to material properties. In mild and moderate TR baselines, thicker leads resulted in exponential increases in ROA. The 4.7 Fr lead remained significantly below clinically relevant increases in TR. In contrast, the 6.8 Fr and 8.6 Fr leads induced a transition from mild to moderate TR.
Conclusions: Simulations support the mechanistic expectation that thinner defibrillation leads reduce mechanical interference with tricuspid leaflet coaptation, with potential implications on clinical outcomes.
{"title":"Smaller defibrillation lead diameter is associated with less tricuspid regurgitation: a computational modeling study.","authors":"David Oks, Robert D Schaller, Pamela K Mason, Kevin L Sack","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2594458","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2594458","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) adversely impacts mortality and hospitalizations. Transvenous pacemaker and defibrillator leads are associated with worsening TR, underscoring the need for lead designs that minimize adverse tricuspid valve interference.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We developed a physics-based computational model to evaluate the general effect of lead diameter and material stiffness on the regurgitant orifice area (ROA). Additionally, we simulated three commercial transvenous leads, with diameters of 4.7 Fr, 6.8 Fr and 8.6 Fr, and evaluated the induced ROA. Three pre-implant baseline conditions were considered in all cases: no TR, mild TR and moderate TR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lead diameter exhibited a predominant effect on ROA compared to material properties. In mild and moderate TR baselines, thicker leads resulted in exponential increases in ROA. The 4.7 Fr lead remained significantly below clinically relevant increases in TR. In contrast, the 6.8 Fr and 8.6 Fr leads induced a transition from mild to moderate TR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simulations support the mechanistic expectation that thinner defibrillation leads reduce mechanical interference with tricuspid leaflet coaptation, with potential implications on clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"69-76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145590379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-24DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2025.2606884
Gabrielle Rubin, Modesto J Colón, Jamal Mahar, Anusha Sunkara, Sowjanya Yenigalla, Francisco A Arabía
Introduction: The SynCardia Total Artificial Heart (TAH) offers a life-saving mechanical circulatory support (MCS) option for patients with end-stage biventricular (BiV) heart failure who are not candidates for traditional devices or are awaiting transplantation. The device and its prior success has opened doors to further research in newer devices and technologies to combat existing challenges with TAH.
Areas covered: This review highlights the clinical utility, device profile and function, safety considerations, patient selection, and current challenges associated with the device. It summarizes key clinical studies, FDA approval history, technical specifications of the TAH, outcomes, complications, and logistical considerations. Literature was sourced through PubMed and clinical trial databases using terms such as 'SynCardia,' 'total artificial heart,' 'biventricular failure,' and 'bridge to transplant.'
Expert opinion: TAH offers full heart replacement and is evolving toward becoming a long-term alternative to transplants. Challenges like power supply, long-term durability, and biocompatibility are being addressed through innovations such as fully implantable systems and hybrid biological-mechanical designs. Unlike transplantation, TAHs avoid immunosuppression and offer hope to patients who cannot wait for donor hearts.In the coming years, global development of advanced TAHs, coupled with better clinical acceptance could transform treatment of end-stage heart failure providing a more accessible, reliable, and life-sustaining solution.
{"title":"A device profile of the SynCardia temporary total artificial heart as a bridge-to-transplantation in patients with biventricular failure.","authors":"Gabrielle Rubin, Modesto J Colón, Jamal Mahar, Anusha Sunkara, Sowjanya Yenigalla, Francisco A Arabía","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2606884","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2606884","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The SynCardia Total Artificial Heart (TAH) offers a life-saving mechanical circulatory support (MCS) option for patients with end-stage biventricular (BiV) heart failure who are not candidates for traditional devices or are awaiting transplantation. The device and its prior success has opened doors to further research in newer devices and technologies to combat existing challenges with TAH.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review highlights the clinical utility, device profile and function, safety considerations, patient selection, and current challenges associated with the device. It summarizes key clinical studies, FDA approval history, technical specifications of the TAH, outcomes, complications, and logistical considerations. Literature was sourced through PubMed and clinical trial databases using terms such as 'SynCardia,' 'total artificial heart,' 'biventricular failure,' and 'bridge to transplant.'</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>TAH offers full heart replacement and is evolving toward becoming a long-term alternative to transplants. Challenges like power supply, long-term durability, and biocompatibility are being addressed through innovations such as fully implantable systems and hybrid biological-mechanical designs. Unlike transplantation, TAHs avoid immunosuppression and offer hope to patients who cannot wait for donor hearts.In the coming years, global development of advanced TAHs, coupled with better clinical acceptance could transform treatment of end-stage heart failure providing a more accessible, reliable, and life-sustaining solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"5-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145812534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2026-01-11DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2025.2594460
Majella Geraghty, Francesco Malandrini, Giuditta Callea, Ali McDonnell, Nicolas Martelli, Ornella Tangila Kayembe, Sebastian Kuhn, Alexandra Herborg Cornelius Poulsson, Tom Melvin
Background: Early Feasibility Studies (EFS) support early-stage evaluation of novel technologies. Under the European Union Medical Device Regulation (EU MDR 2017/745), National Competent Authorities (NCAs) assess these investigations. However, little is known about their organizational readiness and ability to assess complex technologies in a consistent and coordinated manner.
Research design and methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted via an online survey and virtual workshop involving 23 NCAs. Outcome measures included assessor assignment models, qualifications, training, use of external experts, sponsor dialogue mechanisms, and preparedness for emerging technologies. Data were thematically analyzed to assess systemic readiness and capacity.
Results: There is variability in the documentation of clinical investigation phases and assessment practices. Gaps in NCA resources were notable in digital health technology (DHTs) and artificial intelligence-enabled medical devices (AIeMD) and statistics. Dialogue mechanisms were present in 63% of NCAs and associated with improved submission quality. Training was fragmented and use of external experts limited. NCAs emphasized regulatory strain due to rising complexity.
Conclusions: There is significant variability in assessor qualifications and practices. These differences limit the consistency of regulatory oversight under the MDR. Establishing structured training programs, and harmonized sponsor dialogue mechanisms will be critical to supporting regulatory preparedness and coherence.
{"title":"Regulatory readiness for innovation: a mixed-methods study of national competent authority professional and organizational capacities in the context of pre-market clinical investigations and early feasibility studies.","authors":"Majella Geraghty, Francesco Malandrini, Giuditta Callea, Ali McDonnell, Nicolas Martelli, Ornella Tangila Kayembe, Sebastian Kuhn, Alexandra Herborg Cornelius Poulsson, Tom Melvin","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2594460","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2594460","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early Feasibility Studies (EFS) support early-stage evaluation of novel technologies. Under the European Union Medical Device Regulation (EU MDR 2017/745), National Competent Authorities (NCAs) assess these investigations. However, little is known about their organizational readiness and ability to assess complex technologies in a consistent and coordinated manner.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A mixed-methods study was conducted via an online survey and virtual workshop involving 23 NCAs. Outcome measures included assessor assignment models, qualifications, training, use of external experts, sponsor dialogue mechanisms, and preparedness for emerging technologies. Data were thematically analyzed to assess systemic readiness and capacity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There is variability in the documentation of clinical investigation phases and assessment practices. Gaps in NCA resources were notable in digital health technology (DHTs) and artificial intelligence-enabled medical devices (AIeMD) and statistics. Dialogue mechanisms were present in 63% of NCAs and associated with improved submission quality. Training was fragmented and use of external experts limited. NCAs emphasized regulatory strain due to rising complexity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is significant variability in assessor qualifications and practices. These differences limit the consistency of regulatory oversight under the MDR. Establishing structured training programs, and harmonized sponsor dialogue mechanisms will be critical to supporting regulatory preparedness and coherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"87-97"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145936937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-12DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2025.2586720
Mohamed Khayata, Zachary Goff, Steven Gordon, Thomas Callahan, Haytham Elgharably, Shinya Unai, Bo Xu
Introduction: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious and increasingly recognized condition, associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis of IE is more challenging in patients with implanted cardiac devices such as cardiac implantable electronic devices, left ventricular assist devices, and left atrial appendage occlusion devices.
Areas covered: This review focuses on the contemporary roles and applications of multi-modality imaging in the evaluation of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices related infection and IE. The role of multi-modality imaging in the diagnosis of patients with native or prosthetic valve IE is beyond the scope of this review. A literature search of the PubMed database was performed between 1 June 2024, and 30 June 2025. Relevant articles on the subjects of 'infective endocarditis,' 'multi-modality imaging,' and 'implanted cardiac devices' were utilized in our review.
Expert opinion: The growing utilization of cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIED) demands improvement in the detection of CIED-related infections. Contemporary guidelines have considered utilizing multimodality imaging to diagnose IE. The incremental value of multimodality imaging remains to be rigorously examined. Large observational studies from tertiary centers might serve as the starting point toward building a strong evidence base.
{"title":"Role of multimodality imaging in cardiac implantable electronic devices related infection and infective endocarditis.","authors":"Mohamed Khayata, Zachary Goff, Steven Gordon, Thomas Callahan, Haytham Elgharably, Shinya Unai, Bo Xu","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2586720","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2586720","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious and increasingly recognized condition, associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The diagnosis of IE is more challenging in patients with implanted cardiac devices such as cardiac implantable electronic devices, left ventricular assist devices, and left atrial appendage occlusion devices.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review focuses on the contemporary roles and applications of multi-modality imaging in the evaluation of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices related infection and IE. The role of multi-modality imaging in the diagnosis of patients with native or prosthetic valve IE is beyond the scope of this review. A literature search of the PubMed database was performed between 1 June 2024, and 30 June 2025. Relevant articles on the subjects of 'infective endocarditis,' 'multi-modality imaging,' and 'implanted cardiac devices' were utilized in our review.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The growing utilization of cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIED) demands improvement in the detection of CIED-related infections. Contemporary guidelines have considered utilizing multimodality imaging to diagnose IE. The incremental value of multimodality imaging remains to be rigorously examined. Large observational studies from tertiary centers might serve as the starting point toward building a strong evidence base.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"47-58"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145453868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-13DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2025.2587849
Eyad Gadour, Aymen Almuhaidb, Stefano Francesco Crinò, Elisa Stasi, Mattia Brigida, Armando Dell'anna, Marcello Spampinato, Christian Cotsoglou, Marco Emilio Dinelli, Gianfranco Donatelli, Giuseppe Dell'anna, Antonio Facciorusso
Introduction: Successful biliary cannulation is crucial for the efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Failure to achieve cannulation can lead to procedure failure, highlighting the importance of mastering various cannulation techniques, particularly in challenging cases.
Areas covered: This article examines advanced biliary cannulation techniques, including guidewire-assisted methods, precut sphincterotomy, and rendezvous procedures. The literature search encompassed PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to April 2024, focusing on randomized trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews evaluating efficacy and safety.
Expert opinion: This paper advocates for a structured, algorithmic approach to cannulation, emphasizing early recognition of difficulty and strategic escalation to advanced techniques to enhance success rates and minimize complications like post-ERCP pancreatitis.
{"title":"A comprehensive review of biliary cannulation techniques in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.","authors":"Eyad Gadour, Aymen Almuhaidb, Stefano Francesco Crinò, Elisa Stasi, Mattia Brigida, Armando Dell'anna, Marcello Spampinato, Christian Cotsoglou, Marco Emilio Dinelli, Gianfranco Donatelli, Giuseppe Dell'anna, Antonio Facciorusso","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2587849","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2587849","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Successful biliary cannulation is crucial for the efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Failure to achieve cannulation can lead to procedure failure, highlighting the importance of mastering various cannulation techniques, particularly in challenging cases.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This article examines advanced biliary cannulation techniques, including guidewire-assisted methods, precut sphincterotomy, and rendezvous procedures. The literature search encompassed PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to April 2024, focusing on randomized trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews evaluating efficacy and safety.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>This paper advocates for a structured, algorithmic approach to cannulation, emphasizing early recognition of difficulty and strategic escalation to advanced techniques to enhance success rates and minimize complications like post-ERCP pancreatitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"35-45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145497944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2025.2595252
Muhammad Hassan Waseem, Zain Ul Abideen, Ameer Haider Cheema, Muhammad Osama, Haseeb Javed Khan, Rabeya Farid, Nohela Rehman, Sania Aimen, Pawan Kumar Thada
Background: This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPDs) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Central, and ScienceDirect were searched till April 2025. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled under a random-effects model using Review Manager. The Cochrane risk of bias (RoB 2.0) tool was used for quality assessment. Funnel plots were assessed for publication bias.
Results: Eight randomized controlled trials, including 11,632 patients undergoing TAVI, were analyzed. Use of CEPDs showed a non-significant reduction in all strokes (RR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.74-1.15, p = 0.48) and disabling stroke (RR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.57-1.12, p = 0.18). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (RR 1.09, 95% CI: 0.71-1.67, p = 0.70), acute kidney injury (AKI) (RR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.44-2.11, p = 0.93), disabling bleeding (RR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.28-3.31; p = 0.94) and major vascular complications (RR 1.25, 95% CI: 0.56-2.78, p = 0.59).
Conclusion: CEPD did not significantly reduce the incidence of ischemic lesions or neurocognitive decline. Current evidence does not support a statistically significant clinical benefit of CEPD use during TAVI. While trends suggest a potential reduction in stroke, larger trials are needed to establish the significance of these results.
背景:本荟萃分析旨在评估脑栓塞保护装置(cepd)在经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)患者中的有效性和安全性。方法:检索PubMed、Cochrane Central和ScienceDirect至2025年4月。使用Review Manager将具有95%置信区间的风险比(rr)合并到随机效应模型中。采用Cochrane偏倚风险(RoB 2.0)工具进行质量评价。漏斗图评估发表偏倚。结果:共纳入8项随机对照试验,共纳入11632例TAVR患者。使用cepd对所有卒中(RR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.74-1.15, p = 0.48)和致残性卒中(RR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.57-1.12, p = 0.18)均无显著降低。两组在全因死亡率(RR 1.09, 95% CI: 0.71-1.67, p = 0.70)、AKI (RR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.44-2.11, p = 0.93)、致残性出血(RR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.28-3.31, p = 0.94)和主要血管并发症(RR 1.25, 95% CI: 0.56-2.78, p = 0.59)方面无显著差异。结论:CEPD对缺血性病变发生率及神经认知能力下降无显著影响。目前的证据不支持在TAVI期间使用CEPD有统计学上显著的临床益处。虽然趋势表明可能减少中风,但需要更大规模的试验来确定这些结果的重要性。
{"title":"Cerebral embolic protection devices in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Muhammad Hassan Waseem, Zain Ul Abideen, Ameer Haider Cheema, Muhammad Osama, Haseeb Javed Khan, Rabeya Farid, Nohela Rehman, Sania Aimen, Pawan Kumar Thada","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2595252","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2595252","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPDs) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Cochrane Central, and ScienceDirect were searched till April 2025. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled under a random-effects model using Review Manager. The Cochrane risk of bias (RoB 2.0) tool was used for quality assessment. Funnel plots were assessed for publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight randomized controlled trials, including 11,632 patients undergoing TAVI, were analyzed. Use of CEPDs showed a non-significant reduction in all strokes (RR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.74-1.15, <i>p</i> = 0.48) and disabling stroke (RR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.57-1.12, <i>p</i> = 0.18). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (RR 1.09, 95% CI: 0.71-1.67, <i>p</i> = 0.70), acute kidney injury (AKI) (RR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.44-2.11, <i>p</i> = 0.93), disabling bleeding (RR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.28-3.31; <i>p</i> = 0.94) and major vascular complications (RR 1.25, 95% CI: 0.56-2.78, <i>p</i> = 0.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CEPD did not significantly reduce the incidence of ischemic lesions or neurocognitive decline. Current evidence does not support a statistically significant clinical benefit of CEPD use during TAVI. While trends suggest a potential reduction in stroke, larger trials are needed to establish the significance of these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"59-68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145643849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) often develops early but remains clinically silent, as dyspnea appears usually after substantial fibrosis. Reduced activity from musculoskeletal limitations further delays recognition. This study assessed alveolar-capillary permeability using 99mTc-DTPA aerosol scintigraphy in dcSSc patients and correlated clearance rates with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and spirometry.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study at a tertiary center in South India (December 2018-January 2021), patients fulfilling ACR/EULAR 2013 dcSSc criteria underwent 99mTc-DTPA aerosol scintigraphy, HRCT, and spirometry.
Results: Among 61 participants, the mean DTPA clearance half-time (T½) was 48.11 ± 23.99 minutes. Patients with ILD had significantly faster clearance than those without ILD (44.06 ± 17.37 vs 63.03 ± 37.28 minutes, p = 0.01). T½ correlated negatively with Warrick's CT score (r = -0.310, p = 0.015) and positively with FVC (r = 0.287, p = 0.026). ROC analysis showed an AUC of 0.646 (95% CI 0.455-0.837); at a cutoff of 49.62 minutes, sensitivity was 68.6% and specificity 60%. The specificity increased to 80% and 90% for cutoffs of 36.83 and 35.48 minutes, respectively.
Conclusion: DTPA clearance was significantly faster in dcSSc patients with ILD. Aerosol scintigraphy may detect early alveolar-capillary dysfunction before radiologic or spirometric changes. Further studies incorporating DLCO and longitudinal follow-up are warranted.
背景:弥漫性皮肤系统性硬化症(dcSSc)的间质性肺病(ILD)通常早期发病,但临床无症状,因为呼吸困难通常在实质性纤维化后出现。肌肉骨骼限制导致的活动减少进一步延迟了识别。本研究使用99mTc-DTPA气溶胶显像评估dcSSc患者的肺泡毛细血管通透性,并使用高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)和肺活量测定法评估相关清除率。方法:在南印度的一个三级中心(2018年12月- 2021年1月)进行的这项横断面研究中,满足ACR/EULAR 2013 dcSSc标准的患者接受了99mTc-DTPA气溶胶扫描、HRCT和肺活量测定。结果:61名参与者中,DTPA清除的平均半程时间(t1 / 2)为48.11±23.99分钟。有ILD的患者清除率明显快于无ILD的患者(44.06±17.37 vs 63.03±37.28分钟,p = 0.01)。t1 / 2与Warrick’s CT评分呈负相关(r = -0.310, p = 0.015),与FVC呈正相关(r = 0.287, p = 0.026)。ROC分析显示AUC为0.646 (95% CI 0.455-0.837);截止时间为49.62分钟,敏感性为68.6%,特异性为60%。特异性分别提高到80%和90%,截止时间分别为36.83和35.48分钟。结论:dcSSc合并ILD患者的DTPA清除率明显加快。气溶胶闪烁成像可以在放射学或肺活量学改变之前检测早期肺泡-毛细血管功能障碍。进一步的研究纳入DLCO和纵向随访是必要的。
{"title":"Assessment of alveolar capillary membrane permeability using technetium 99m-diethylene triamine pentaacetate (Tc99m-DTPA) aerosols in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis - a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Muniza Bai, Dharm Prakash Dwivedi, Kota Keerthi Chandra, Nandini Pandit, Chengappa G Kavadichanda, Subathra Adithan, Sivaranjini Ramassamy, Vishnukanth Govindaraj, Manju Rajaram","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2603575","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2603575","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interstitial lung disease (ILD) in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) often develops early but remains clinically silent, as dyspnea appears usually after substantial fibrosis. Reduced activity from musculoskeletal limitations further delays recognition. This study assessed alveolar-capillary permeability using 99mTc-DTPA aerosol scintigraphy in dcSSc patients and correlated clearance rates with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and spirometry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study at a tertiary center in South India (December 2018-January 2021), patients fulfilling ACR/EULAR 2013 dcSSc criteria underwent 99mTc-DTPA aerosol scintigraphy, HRCT, and spirometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 61 participants, the mean DTPA clearance half-time (T½) was 48.11 ± 23.99 minutes. Patients with ILD had significantly faster clearance than those without ILD (44.06 ± 17.37 vs 63.03 ± 37.28 minutes, <i>p</i> = 0.01). T½ correlated negatively with Warrick's CT score (<i>r</i> = -0.310, <i>p</i> = 0.015) and positively with FVC (<i>r</i> = 0.287, <i>p</i> = 0.026). ROC analysis showed an AUC of 0.646 (95% CI 0.455-0.837); at a cutoff of 49.62 minutes, sensitivity was 68.6% and specificity 60%. The specificity increased to 80% and 90% for cutoffs of 36.83 and 35.48 minutes, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DTPA clearance was significantly faster in dcSSc patients with ILD. Aerosol scintigraphy may detect early alveolar-capillary dysfunction before radiologic or spirometric changes. Further studies incorporating DLCO and longitudinal follow-up are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"77-86"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145727523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-09-23DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2025.2563428
{"title":"Statement of Retraction: The impact of aerosol box on tracheal intubation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2563428","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2563428","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145133074","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}