首页 > 最新文献

Health affairs scholar最新文献

英文 中文
Shared labor-Public Private Partnerships for Maternal Health Equity. 共享劳动-公私伙伴关系促进产妇保健公平。
IF 2.7 Pub Date : 2026-02-12 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxag038
Rasheca Logendran, Meghana Sai Iragavarapu, Halle Tecco

The United States faces a worsening maternal health crisis, with mortality rates far exceeding those of peer nations and persistent inequities for Black, Indigenous, and rural women. Medicaid finances over 40% of U.S. births, yet fiscal pressure, heightened scrutiny of program spending, and political resistance to benefit expansion constrain states' ability to adopt new maternal health interventions. In this environment, outcome-indexed public-private partnerships (PPPs) offer a pragmatic pathway to advance maternal health equity while tying expenditures to measurable value. This paper examines the promise and limitations of emerging FemTech innovations such as virtual doula care, remote patient monitoring, and AI-enabled risk-assessment-and the structural barriers that impede their adoption in Medicaid. We argue that innovation failures reflect misaligned incentives rather than lack of technological potential. To address this gap, we propose a coordinated policy framework that aligns the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Transforming Maternal Health Model and Medicaid Section 1115 waivers across the innovation lifecycle. This approach enables disciplined experimentation, independent evaluation, and scalable deployment of equity-focused technologies within Medicaid, safeguarding maternal health gains under constrained fiscal conditions.

美国面临着不断恶化的孕产妇健康危机,死亡率远远超过其他国家,黑人、土著和农村妇女的不平等现象持续存在。医疗补助计划资助了美国40%以上的新生儿,但财政压力、对项目支出的严格审查以及对福利扩大的政治阻力限制了各州采用新的孕产妇健康干预措施的能力。在这种环境下,以成果为指标的公私伙伴关系(ppp)为促进孕产妇保健公平提供了一条务实的途径,同时将支出与可衡量的价值挂钩。本文考察了新兴的FemTech创新的前景和局限性,如虚拟助产师护理、远程患者监护和人工智能支持的风险评估,以及阻碍其在医疗补助中应用的结构性障碍。我们认为,创新失败反映了不一致的激励,而不是缺乏技术潜力。为了解决这一差距,我们提出了一个协调的政策框架,将卫生高级研究计划局(ARPA-H)、医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)转变孕产妇健康模式和医疗补助第1115节在创新生命周期中的豁免联系起来。这种方法能够在医疗补助计划中进行有纪律的实验、独立评估和可扩展的以公平为重点的技术部署,在有限的财政条件下保障孕产妇健康收益。
{"title":"Shared labor-Public Private Partnerships for Maternal Health Equity.","authors":"Rasheca Logendran, Meghana Sai Iragavarapu, Halle Tecco","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxag038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The United States faces a worsening maternal health crisis, with mortality rates far exceeding those of peer nations and persistent inequities for Black, Indigenous, and rural women. Medicaid finances over 40% of U.S. births, yet fiscal pressure, heightened scrutiny of program spending, and political resistance to benefit expansion constrain states' ability to adopt new maternal health interventions. In this environment, outcome-indexed public-private partnerships (PPPs) offer a pragmatic pathway to advance maternal health equity while tying expenditures to measurable value. This paper examines the promise and limitations of emerging FemTech innovations such as virtual doula care, remote patient monitoring, and AI-enabled risk-assessment-and the structural barriers that impede their adoption in Medicaid. We argue that innovation failures reflect misaligned incentives rather than lack of technological potential. To address this gap, we propose a coordinated policy framework that aligns the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Transforming Maternal Health Model and Medicaid Section 1115 waivers across the innovation lifecycle. This approach enables disciplined experimentation, independent evaluation, and scalable deployment of equity-focused technologies within Medicaid, safeguarding maternal health gains under constrained fiscal conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"4 2","pages":"qxag038"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12941183/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147328604","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
State laws that address workplace violence in health care settings. 解决卫生保健机构工作场所暴力问题的州法律。
IF 2.7 Pub Date : 2026-02-11 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxag022
Brianna Lombardi, Colleen Tapen, Erin Fraher

Introduction: Workplace violence (WPV) against health care workers is a longstanding challenge that impacts the well-being of workers and patients. State legislative efforts to address WPV against health care workers have accelerated in recent years, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: This study conducted a review of WPV-related enacted laws in health care settings across all 50 states over the last 10 years.

Results: As of June 2024, 48 states had enacted at least 1 WPV law, and some states have enacted 2 or more laws. State laws were categorized into 3 types: penalties, prevention, and remediation. Forty-five states had laws that penalize perpetrators of WPV, 27 enacted prevention laws, and 23 had remediation laws. Ten states had laws combining penalties with either prevention or remediation, 17 states had laws covering all 3 categories, while 3 states had only prevention and remediation laws.

Conclusion: Understanding variation in state WPV laws is important to future efforts to evaluate the efficacy of different legislative approaches. This study provides a landscape for federal and state government to understand legislative trends, and can inform health systems on strategies that can be used to prevent and address WPV.

导言:针对卫生保健工作者的工作场所暴力(WPV)是一个长期存在的挑战,影响着工作者和患者的福祉。近年来,特别是在COVID-19大流行之后,各州在解决针对卫生保健工作者的脊髓灰质炎问题上的立法努力加快了。方法:本研究对过去10年中全美50个州的卫生保健机构中与wpv相关的颁布法律进行了回顾。结果:截至2024年6月,48个州颁布了至少1部WPV法,一些州颁布了2部或更多法律。州法律分为三类:处罚、预防和补救。45个州制定了惩处野生动物疫苗肇事者的法律,27个州制定了预防法律,23个州制定了补救法律。10个州的法律将惩罚与预防或补救措施结合起来,17个州的法律涵盖了所有三种类别,而3个州的法律仅包括预防和补救措施。结论:了解各州WPV法律的差异对未来评估不同立法途径的有效性具有重要意义。这项研究为联邦和州政府了解立法趋势提供了一个背景,并可以为卫生系统提供可用于预防和处理野生脊灰的战略信息。
{"title":"State laws that address workplace violence in health care settings.","authors":"Brianna Lombardi, Colleen Tapen, Erin Fraher","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxag022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag022","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Workplace violence (WPV) against health care workers is a longstanding challenge that impacts the well-being of workers and patients. State legislative efforts to address WPV against health care workers have accelerated in recent years, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study conducted a review of WPV-related enacted laws in health care settings across all 50 states over the last 10 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As of June 2024, 48 states had enacted at least 1 WPV law, and some states have enacted 2 or more laws. State laws were categorized into 3 types: penalties, prevention, and remediation. Forty-five states had laws that penalize perpetrators of WPV, 27 enacted prevention laws, and 23 had remediation laws. Ten states had laws combining penalties with either prevention or remediation, 17 states had laws covering all 3 categories, while 3 states had only prevention and remediation laws.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding variation in state WPV laws is important to future efforts to evaluate the efficacy of different legislative approaches. This study provides a landscape for federal and state government to understand legislative trends, and can inform health systems on strategies that can be used to prevent and address WPV.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"4 2","pages":"qxag022"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12937582/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147328685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Standardized clinical assessment and management plans revisited: lessons learned from a decade of implementation. 重新审视标准化临床评估和管理计划:十年实施的经验教训。
IF 2.7 Pub Date : 2026-02-10 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxag036
Michael Farias, Peta Alexander, Jeffrey Geppert, Paige Glavin, Jessily Ramirez-Mendoza, Paul Casale, Kathy Jenkins

Introduction: Originally introduced in Health Affairs in 2013, Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plans (SCAMPs) are clinician-developed, modifiable care pathways designed to reduce unwarranted variation and optimize resource use while preserving professional judgment. Unlike traditional clinical practice guidelines that prescribe "best" practice, SCAMPs begin with consensus-based "sound" practice and emphasize iterative learning from real-world deviations and outcomes. Initially developed for conditions with limited evidence, SCAMPs have since expanded across a wide range of diagnoses and care settings.

Methods: We conducted a structured historical review of more than 40 peer-reviewed publications describing SCAMPs development, implementation, evaluation, and iterative refinement. The review synthesizes reported experiences across clinical domains, settings, and study designs, and is intended as a descriptive, perspective-oriented assessment rather than a formal systematic review.

Results: Published SCAMPs reports describe broad deployment across diverse conditions and institutions, with recurrent findings of reduced practice variation, changes in resource utilization, iterative pathway refinement, and high reported adherence among participating clinicians. The literature also reflects important limitations, including heterogeneity of study designs, limited evaluation of harms, equity, patient-reported outcomes, and implementation burden, and likely underrepresentation of unsuccessful implementations. Early reliance on paper-based workflows constrained scalability and consistency of use.

Conclusion: This perspective synthesizes the published SCAMPs experience, highlighting reported benefits alongside implementation conditions, risks, and limitations. SCAMPs are best understood as a clinician-led methodology whose value is conditional on governance, analytic capacity, patient safety oversight, and attention to equity. Emerging informatics standards and artificial intelligence tools may enhance scalability and learning, but require careful governance to avoid amplifying bias or harm.

简介:标准化临床评估和管理计划(SCAMPs)最初于2013年在《卫生事务》中引入,是临床医生开发的可修改的护理路径,旨在减少不必要的变化,优化资源利用,同时保持专业判断。与传统临床实践指南规定的“最佳”实践不同,SCAMPs从基于共识的“合理”实践开始,并强调从现实世界的偏差和结果中反复学习。SCAMPs最初是针对证据有限的疾病而开发的,现已扩展到广泛的诊断和护理环境中。方法:我们对40多篇同行评审的描述SCAMPs开发、实现、评估和迭代改进的出版物进行了结构化的历史回顾。该综述综合了跨临床领域、环境和研究设计的报告经验,旨在作为描述性的、以观点为导向的评估,而不是正式的系统综述。结果:已发表的SCAMPs报告描述了在不同条件和机构中的广泛部署,反复发现实践变化减少,资源利用变化,迭代路径优化,以及参与临床医生的高依从性。文献也反映了重要的局限性,包括研究设计的异质性,对危害、公平性、患者报告的结果和实施负担的有限评估,以及可能对不成功实施的代表性不足。早期对基于纸张的工作流的依赖限制了可伸缩性和使用的一致性。结论:该观点综合了已发表的SCAMPs经验,突出了报告的收益以及实施条件、风险和局限性。SCAMPs最好被理解为一种临床医生主导的方法,其价值取决于治理、分析能力、患者安全监督和对公平的关注。新兴的信息学标准和人工智能工具可能会增强可扩展性和学习能力,但需要仔细治理,以避免放大偏见或伤害。
{"title":"Standardized clinical assessment and management plans revisited: lessons learned from a decade of implementation.","authors":"Michael Farias, Peta Alexander, Jeffrey Geppert, Paige Glavin, Jessily Ramirez-Mendoza, Paul Casale, Kathy Jenkins","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxag036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag036","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Originally introduced in <i>Health Affairs</i> in 2013, Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plans (SCAMPs) are clinician-developed, modifiable care pathways designed to reduce unwarranted variation and optimize resource use while preserving professional judgment. Unlike traditional clinical practice guidelines that prescribe \"best\" practice, SCAMPs begin with consensus-based \"sound\" practice and emphasize iterative learning from real-world deviations and outcomes. Initially developed for conditions with limited evidence, SCAMPs have since expanded across a wide range of diagnoses and care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a structured historical review of more than 40 peer-reviewed publications describing SCAMPs development, implementation, evaluation, and iterative refinement. The review synthesizes reported experiences across clinical domains, settings, and study designs, and is intended as a descriptive, perspective-oriented assessment rather than a formal systematic review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Published SCAMPs reports describe broad deployment across diverse conditions and institutions, with recurrent findings of reduced practice variation, changes in resource utilization, iterative pathway refinement, and high reported adherence among participating clinicians. The literature also reflects important limitations, including heterogeneity of study designs, limited evaluation of harms, equity, patient-reported outcomes, and implementation burden, and likely underrepresentation of unsuccessful implementations. Early reliance on paper-based workflows constrained scalability and consistency of use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This perspective synthesizes the published SCAMPs experience, highlighting reported benefits alongside implementation conditions, risks, and limitations. SCAMPs are best understood as a clinician-led methodology whose value is conditional on governance, analytic capacity, patient safety oversight, and attention to equity. Emerging informatics standards and artificial intelligence tools may enhance scalability and learning, but require careful governance to avoid amplifying bias or harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"4 3","pages":"qxag036"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12982919/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147470612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction to: Insulin rationing in states with and without insulin copay caps: a cross-sectional study. 修正:有和没有胰岛素共同支付上限的州的胰岛素配给:一项横断面研究。
IF 2.7 Pub Date : 2026-02-09 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxag025

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf100.].

[这更正了文章DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf100.]。
{"title":"Correction to: Insulin rationing in states with and without insulin copay caps: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxag025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf100.].</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"4 2","pages":"qxag025"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12885001/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146159635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Recent trends in US government healthcare & behavioral health workforce departures. 美国政府医疗保健和行为健康工作人员离职的最新趋势。
IF 2.7 Pub Date : 2026-02-07 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxag032
Nichole Fusilier, Elisabeth Stelson, Janette Dill

Introduction: Healthcare and behavioral health professionals employed by local, state, and federal governments are essential to maintaining public health infrastructure, ensuring access to care, and responding to emergencies. Despite their importance, limited research has examined how recent policy, budgetary, and labor market changes are influencing their employment stability and retention within government sectors.

Methods: This study used longitudinal data from the Current Population Survey (2015-2025) to examine employment transitions among government-employed healthcare and behavioral health workers. We estimated the predicted probabilities of (1) transitions from government to non-governmental employment and (2) full exits from the labor force.

Results: Historically, federal healthcare and behavioral health workers had the lowest exit rates from government employment, but their probability of leaving government employment rose sharply in 2024-2025, converging with state and local levels (8%). Healthcare workers were consistently more likely than behavioral health workers to transition out of government roles, though both groups experienced higher exit rates in 2024-2025. Federal employees also exhibited a modest increase in labor force exits, from 2.5%-3% to 3.8% in 2024-2025.

Conclusion: These trends suggest increasing instability in the government-employed health workforce.

简介:地方、州和联邦政府雇用的医疗保健和行为健康专业人员对维护公共卫生基础设施、确保获得医疗服务和应对紧急情况至关重要。尽管他们很重要,但有限的研究调查了最近的政策、预算和劳动力市场变化如何影响他们在政府部门的就业稳定性和保留。方法:本研究采用2015-2025年当前人口调查(Current Population Survey)的纵向数据,考察政府雇用的医疗保健和行为卫生工作者的就业转变。我们估计了(1)从政府就业转向非政府就业和(2)完全退出劳动力的预测概率。结果:从历史上看,联邦医疗保健和行为卫生工作者的政府就业离职率最低,但他们的离职概率在2024-2025年急剧上升,与州和地方水平(8%)趋同。与行为健康工作者相比,卫生保健工作者一直更有可能从政府职位中离职,尽管这两个群体在2024-2025年的离职率都更高。联邦雇员的劳动力退出率也略有上升,从2.5%-3%上升到2024-2025年的3.8%。结论:这些趋势表明政府雇用的卫生人力越来越不稳定。
{"title":"Recent trends in US government healthcare & behavioral health workforce departures.","authors":"Nichole Fusilier, Elisabeth Stelson, Janette Dill","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxag032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag032","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Healthcare and behavioral health professionals employed by local, state, and federal governments are essential to maintaining public health infrastructure, ensuring access to care, and responding to emergencies. Despite their importance, limited research has examined how recent policy, budgetary, and labor market changes are influencing their employment stability and retention within government sectors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used longitudinal data from the Current Population Survey (2015-2025) to examine employment transitions among government-employed healthcare and behavioral health workers. We estimated the predicted probabilities of (1) transitions from government to non-governmental employment and (2) full exits from the labor force.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Historically, federal healthcare and behavioral health workers had the lowest exit rates from government employment, but their probability of leaving government employment rose sharply in 2024-2025, converging with state and local levels (8%). Healthcare workers were consistently more likely than behavioral health workers to transition out of government roles, though both groups experienced higher exit rates in 2024-2025. Federal employees also exhibited a modest increase in labor force exits, from 2.5%-3% to 3.8% in 2024-2025.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These trends suggest increasing instability in the government-employed health workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"4 2","pages":"qxag032"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12931559/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147313653","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of declining therapy volumes in skilled nursing facility outcomes: a mediation analysis. 治疗量下降在熟练护理机构结果中的作用:中介分析。
IF 2.7 Pub Date : 2026-02-07 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxag029
Rachel A Prusynski, Andrew Humbert, Harsha Amaravadi, Robert E Burke, Debra Saliba, Natalie E Leland, Janet Freburger, Tracy M Mroz

Introduction: Significant declines in therapy provision in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) followed the 2019 implementation of Medicare's Patient-Driven Payment Model (PDPM) and the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, raising concerns about effects on patient outcomes.

Methods: Using Medicare fee-for-service claims and SNF assessment data from January 2018 through September 2021, we analyzed 3.5 million post-hospital SNF stays to assess whether changes in therapy volumes mediated changes in successful community discharge and 30-day hospital readmissions.

Results: Average total physical, occupational, and speech therapy minutes per day declined from 122.2 before PDPM to 96.5 immediately after implementation and to 87.7 during the pandemic. Adjusted probabilities of successful community discharge rose modestly after PDPM but fell during COVID-19, while readmissions declined initially and then increased. Mediation analyses showed that reductions in therapy volumes were strongly associated with the declines in community discharge and increases in readmissions. These findings persisted for patients with dementia and moderate levels of functional impairment at admission; declining therapy volumes were associated with the observed worsening of discharge outcomes after PDPM implementation and during the pandemic.

Conclusions: Results highlight therapy provision as a key modifiable policy target for improving post-acute outcomes and reducing rehospitalizations among older adults in SNFs.

导论:在2019年实施医疗保险患者驱动支付模式(PDPM)和2019冠状病毒病大流行之后,熟练护理机构(snf)的治疗供应大幅下降,引发了对患者预后影响的担忧。方法:利用2018年1月至2021年9月的医疗保险按服务收费索赔和SNF评估数据,我们分析了350万次院后SNF住院,以评估治疗量的变化是否介导了成功社区出院和30天再入院的变化。结果:每天平均总物理、职业和语言治疗时间从PDPM实施前的122.2分钟下降到实施后的96.5分钟,在大流行期间下降到87.7分钟。调整后的社区成功出院概率在PDPM后略有上升,但在COVID-19期间下降,而再入院率最初下降,然后上升。调解分析表明,治疗量的减少与社区出院率的下降和再入院率的增加密切相关。这些发现适用于入院时患有痴呆和中度功能障碍的患者;治疗量的减少与实施PDPM后和大流行期间观察到的出院结果恶化有关。结论:研究结果强调,提供治疗是改善snf老年人急性后预后和减少再住院的关键可修改政策目标。
{"title":"The role of declining therapy volumes in skilled nursing facility outcomes: a mediation analysis.","authors":"Rachel A Prusynski, Andrew Humbert, Harsha Amaravadi, Robert E Burke, Debra Saliba, Natalie E Leland, Janet Freburger, Tracy M Mroz","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxag029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag029","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Significant declines in therapy provision in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) followed the 2019 implementation of Medicare's Patient-Driven Payment Model (PDPM) and the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, raising concerns about effects on patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Medicare fee-for-service claims and SNF assessment data from January 2018 through September 2021, we analyzed 3.5 million post-hospital SNF stays to assess whether changes in therapy volumes mediated changes in successful community discharge and 30-day hospital readmissions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average total physical, occupational, and speech therapy minutes per day declined from 122.2 before PDPM to 96.5 immediately after implementation and to 87.7 during the pandemic. Adjusted probabilities of successful community discharge rose modestly after PDPM but fell during COVID-19, while readmissions declined initially and then increased. Mediation analyses showed that reductions in therapy volumes were strongly associated with the declines in community discharge and increases in readmissions. These findings persisted for patients with dementia and moderate levels of functional impairment at admission; declining therapy volumes were associated with the observed worsening of discharge outcomes after PDPM implementation and during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results highlight therapy provision as a key modifiable policy target for improving post-acute outcomes and reducing rehospitalizations among older adults in SNFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"4 2","pages":"qxag029"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12927502/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147286776","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Amplifying community perspectives in Medicaid policymaking: findings from North Carolina. 扩大医疗补助政策制定中的社区观点:来自北卡罗来纳州的研究结果。
IF 2.7 Pub Date : 2026-02-07 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxag033
Sara Debab, Samantha Repka, Katie Huber, Alida Austin, Rushina Cholera, William Bleser, Yolande Pokam Tchuisseu, Ariana Khayamian, Anna Seaman, Andrea Thoumi, Robert Saunders, Rebecca Whitaker

Introduction: In the midst of sweeping federal and state policy changes that will significantly impact Medicaid, effectively integrating community feedback into Medicaid policymaking will require identifying what Medicaid beneficiaries want and need to be healthy. We aimed to identify North Carolina community leaders' and community members' wants, needs, and experiences with Medicaid.

Methods: This qualitative study collected data using semi-structured interviews with 4 leaders of community-based organizations (CBOs), and 6 focus groups with 37 community members held across North Carolina between April and August 2024.

Results: A rapid qualitative analysis yielded 6 themes related to barriers and facilitators to overall health and well-being: (1) Challenges Applying for and Accessing Medicaid Services, (2) Addressing Health-Related Social Needs, (3) Accessing High-Quality Providers & Services, (4) Experiencing Stigma, Bias and Discrimination in Clinical Settings, (5) Promoting Coordination, Co-Location to Help with System Navigation, and (6) Enhancing Medicaid Engagement with Communities.

Conclusion: CBO leaders and community members communicated actionable insights that amplify important perspectives often not incorporated in Medicaid policymaking. As Medicaid agencies contend with implementing broad structural changes to their benefits and programs, it will be critical to tailor future reforms to address community feedback and maintain the health and well-being of beneficiaries.

导读:在联邦和州的政策变化中,将对医疗补助计划产生重大影响,有效地将社区反馈整合到医疗补助政策制定中,需要确定医疗补助受益人想要什么和需要什么是健康的。我们的目标是确定北卡罗来纳州社区领导人和社区成员对医疗补助计划的需求和经验。方法:本研究采用半结构化访谈的方法,对北卡罗来纳州社区组织(cbo)的4位领导人进行访谈,并对37名社区成员进行了6次焦点小组访谈。结果:快速定性分析产生了与整体健康和福祉的障碍和促进因素相关的6个主题:(1)申请和获得医疗补助服务的挑战,(2)解决与健康相关的社会需求,(3)获得高质量的提供者和服务,(4)在临床环境中经历耻辱,偏见和歧视,(5)促进协调,共同定位以帮助系统导航,(6)加强与社区的医疗补助参与。结论:国会预算办公室领导和社区成员沟通了可操作的见解,放大了医疗补助政策制定中通常未纳入的重要观点。随着医疗补助机构对其福利和计划进行广泛的结构性改革,调整未来的改革以解决社区反馈并保持受益人的健康和福祉将是至关重要的。
{"title":"Amplifying community perspectives in Medicaid policymaking: findings from North Carolina.","authors":"Sara Debab, Samantha Repka, Katie Huber, Alida Austin, Rushina Cholera, William Bleser, Yolande Pokam Tchuisseu, Ariana Khayamian, Anna Seaman, Andrea Thoumi, Robert Saunders, Rebecca Whitaker","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxag033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag033","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the midst of sweeping federal and state policy changes that will significantly impact Medicaid, effectively integrating community feedback into Medicaid policymaking will require identifying what Medicaid beneficiaries want and need to be healthy. We aimed to identify North Carolina community leaders' and community members' wants, needs, and experiences with Medicaid.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study collected data using semi-structured interviews with 4 leaders of community-based organizations (CBOs), and 6 focus groups with 37 community members held across North Carolina between April and August 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A rapid qualitative analysis yielded 6 themes related to barriers and facilitators to overall health and well-being: (1) Challenges Applying for and Accessing Medicaid Services, (2) Addressing Health-Related Social Needs, (3) Accessing High-Quality Providers & Services, (4) Experiencing Stigma, Bias and Discrimination in Clinical Settings, (5) Promoting Coordination, Co-Location to Help with System Navigation, and (6) Enhancing Medicaid Engagement with Communities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CBO leaders and community members communicated actionable insights that amplify important perspectives often not incorporated in Medicaid policymaking. As Medicaid agencies contend with implementing broad structural changes to their benefits and programs, it will be critical to tailor future reforms to address community feedback and maintain the health and well-being of beneficiaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"4 2","pages":"qxag033"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12911923/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146222577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
FDA approvals of specialty drugs, 2000-2024. FDA批准的特殊药物,2000-2024。
IF 2.7 Pub Date : 2026-02-07 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxag035
Sophie E Knox, Claire H Brennan, Daniel E Enright, Peter J Neumann, James D Chambers
{"title":"FDA approvals of specialty drugs, 2000-2024.","authors":"Sophie E Knox, Claire H Brennan, Daniel E Enright, Peter J Neumann, James D Chambers","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxag035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag035","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"4 2","pages":"qxag035"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12927497/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147286730","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Using AI to improve peer review and research integrity in scientific journals. 利用人工智能提高科学期刊的同行评议和研究诚信。
IF 2.7 Pub Date : 2026-02-07 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxag028
Howard Bauchner, Frederick Rivara

Peer review is inefficient, biased, and often ineffective. However, its importance in maintaining research integrity, at a time when the public has less faith in science, is clear, since journals are the principal conduit for communicating the results of research to the scientific community and the public. Given that the number of published manuscripts in the biomedical sciences now exceeds 3 million per year it is no longer possible for human editorial and peer review alone to ensure integrity. New approaches are needed, including the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to assist in editorial and peer review.

同行评议是低效的、有偏见的,而且常常是无效的。然而,在公众对科学缺乏信心的时候,期刊在维护研究诚信方面的重要性是显而易见的,因为期刊是向科学界和公众传达研究结果的主要渠道。鉴于生物医学科学领域发表的手稿数量现在每年超过300万份,仅靠人工编辑和同行评审已不可能确保完整性。需要新的方法,包括使用人工智能(AI)来协助编辑和同行评审。
{"title":"Using AI to improve peer review and research integrity in scientific journals.","authors":"Howard Bauchner, Frederick Rivara","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxag028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag028","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Peer review is inefficient, biased, and often ineffective. However, its importance in maintaining research integrity, at a time when the public has less faith in science, is clear, since journals are the principal conduit for communicating the results of research to the scientific community and the public. Given that the number of published manuscripts in the biomedical sciences now exceeds 3 million per year it is no longer possible for human editorial and peer review alone to ensure integrity. New approaches are needed, including the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to assist in editorial and peer review.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"4 2","pages":"qxag028"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12927498/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147286745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prescription denied: an audit of functional access barriers in California's Medi-Cal Rx system. 拒绝处方:对加州Medi-Cal Rx系统功能性准入障碍的审计。
IF 2.7 Pub Date : 2026-02-05 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxag031
Samah Khan, Joyce Moon Howard
{"title":"Prescription denied: an audit of functional access barriers in California's Medi-Cal Rx system.","authors":"Samah Khan, Joyce Moon Howard","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxag031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag031","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"4 2","pages":"qxag031"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12911925/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146222619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Health affairs scholar
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1