Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111496
M Scrivano, G Fedeli, S Porcino, E Sinno, A P Vadalà, A Clarioni, A Redler, D Perugia
Introduction: Internal fixation in not-comminuted oblique and transverse olecranon fractures is commonly performed with tension band wiring. However, despite its high healing rate, this technique is associated with a high rate of complications, often requiring the removal of fixation devices in up to 80 % of cases. The aim of our study was to describe a surgical technique using eyelet pins that maintains the effectiveness of the classic tension band wiring while reducing intolerance or displacement of the fixation devices.
Methods: Fifteen patients with surgically treated Mayo type II A or II B olecranon fractures, meeting the inclusion criteria, were enrolled. Clinical and functional assessments were conducted using MEPS and DASH scores at the 12 month follow-up. Additionally, complications and the duration of the operation were documented.
Results: Fifteen patients were enrolled, with eight having type II A and seven having type II B olecranon fractures. The mean patient age was 46.8 years, including ten males and five females. Nine cases involved the right side, while six involved the left. At the 12-month follow-up, the mean MEPS score was 98/100, and the DASH score was 9. Two patients (13.3 %) experienced superficial wound infections, and two (13.3 %) had persistent pain at the triceps tendon insertion site. No cases required removal of fixation devices.
Conclusion: The eyelet pin system was found to be a safe and effective method for reducing and fixing olecranon fractures. Based on a limited series, this new technique exhibits the same reliability and reproducibility as tension band wiring but with a lower rate of complications.
{"title":"Olecranon fractures: An old fixation device for a new surgical technique.","authors":"M Scrivano, G Fedeli, S Porcino, E Sinno, A P Vadalà, A Clarioni, A Redler, D Perugia","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111496","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111496","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Internal fixation in not-comminuted oblique and transverse olecranon fractures is commonly performed with tension band wiring. However, despite its high healing rate, this technique is associated with a high rate of complications, often requiring the removal of fixation devices in up to 80 % of cases. The aim of our study was to describe a surgical technique using eyelet pins that maintains the effectiveness of the classic tension band wiring while reducing intolerance or displacement of the fixation devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen patients with surgically treated Mayo type II A or II B olecranon fractures, meeting the inclusion criteria, were enrolled. Clinical and functional assessments were conducted using MEPS and DASH scores at the 12 month follow-up. Additionally, complications and the duration of the operation were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen patients were enrolled, with eight having type II A and seven having type II B olecranon fractures. The mean patient age was 46.8 years, including ten males and five females. Nine cases involved the right side, while six involved the left. At the 12-month follow-up, the mean MEPS score was 98/100, and the DASH score was 9. Two patients (13.3 %) experienced superficial wound infections, and two (13.3 %) had persistent pain at the triceps tendon insertion site. No cases required removal of fixation devices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The eyelet pin system was found to be a safe and effective method for reducing and fixing olecranon fractures. Based on a limited series, this new technique exhibits the same reliability and reproducibility as tension band wiring but with a lower rate of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":"55 Suppl 4 ","pages":"111496"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142634028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111398
Domenico De Mauro, Alessandro Aprato, Federico Bove, Umberto Mezzadri, Pietro Domenico Giorgi, Alessandro Casiraghi, Claudio Galante, Rocco Erasmo, Federico Santolini, Matteo Formica, Amarildo Smakaj, Giuseppe Rovere, Michele Ceccarelli, Andrea Fidanza, Luca Faugno, Alberto Balagna, Matteo Fabbro, Lorenzo Are, Federico Moretti, Silvia Marino, Giulio Maccauro, Alessandro Massè, Francesco Liuzza
Purpose: Posterior pelvic ring lesions are a common finding in patients with pelvic trauma, representing a challenging condition for trauma surgeons. Surgical options are different and there is not yet evidence about the best option. Aim of the study are: (i) to compare Lumbopelvic fixation (LPF) and ilio-sacral screw fixation (ISS) regarding clinical and radiological outcome in unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries, both as whole population and single similar fracture types according to Tile classification (C1vsC1, C2vsC2, C3vsC3); (ii) to analyze clinical outcomes and complications in lumbopelvic fixation group, comparing open and closed reduction technique.
Methods: A retrospective multicenter study was performed. Data of the patients were collected. Inclusion criteria were: (i) unstable posterior ring lesions Tile C type, (ii) surgically treated either through ISS (Group A) or LPF (Group B), (iii) minimum follow-up 12 months. Radiological evaluation was made through plain radiographs in Antero-posterior (AP), inlet and outlet views. Last clinical evaluation at 12 months was assessed through Majeed Score, and quality of life (QoL) through SF-12.
Results: Group A was represented by 76 patients, and Group B by 42. Group B had better result in Majeed score for non-workers (average 60.1 ± 21.6 vs 65.0 ± 15.6, p = 0.016*). Comparing only C3-type lesions, Group A showed a higher rate of implants breakage (p = 0.032*). Other differences had p > 0.05. Comparing patients underwent open (ORIF) or closed (CRIF) reduction in Group B, CRIF group had shorter hospitalization (47.2 vs 23.4 days, p = 0.020*), an earlier full weight-bearing recovery (4.1 vs 2.6 months, p = 0.035*) and a better Majeed score in workers patients (70.3 vs 82.8, p = 0.019*). Better results for CRIF group were also recorded in quality of life (QoL), both in mental (45.1 vs 55.2, p = 0.040*) and physical outcome (31.9 vs 50.7, p < 0.001*).
Conclusion: ISS and LPF represent both good choices in posterior pelvic ring lesions, however some significant differences were noted. LPF seems to be preferable if the patient did not work before the trauma, due to better clinical outcome. In Tile C3 lesions, LPF have lower breakage rates. If LPF is chosen, CRIF provides better clinical outcomes, QoL and lower hospitalization.
目的:骨盆后环病变是骨盆创伤患者的常见病,对创伤外科医生来说是一种挑战。手术方案各不相同,目前尚无证据表明最佳方案是什么。本研究的目的是(i) 比较腰椎骨盆固定术(LPF)和髂骶螺钉固定术(ISS)对不稳定后骨盆环损伤的临床和放射学结果,既包括整个人群,也包括根据 Tile 分类(C1vsC1、C2vsC2、C3vsC3)的单一相似骨折类型;(ii) 分析腰椎骨盆固定术组的临床结果和并发症,比较开放和闭合复位技术:方法:这是一项回顾性多中心研究。方法:进行一项多中心回顾性研究,收集患者数据。纳入标准为(i) 不稳定的后环病变 Tile C 型,(ii) 通过 ISS(A 组)或 LPF(B 组)手术治疗,(iii) 随访至少 12 个月。通过前-后(AP)、入口和出口切面的平片进行放射学评估。12 个月的最后一次临床评估通过 Majeed 评分进行,生活质量(QoL)通过 SF-12 进行:结果:A组有76名患者,B组有42名患者。B 组非工人的 Majeed 评分结果更好(平均 60.1 ± 21.6 vs 65.0 ± 15.6,P = 0.016*)。仅比较 C3 型病变,A 组的种植体破损率更高(p = 0.032*)。其他差异的 p > 0.05。对比 B 组接受开放式(ORIF)或闭合式(CRIF)截骨术的患者,CRIF 组住院时间更短(47.2 天 vs 23.4 天,p = 0.020*),完全负重恢复更早(4.1 个月 vs 2.6 个月,p = 0.035*),工人患者的 Majeed 评分更高(70.3 分 vs 82.8 分,p = 0.019*)。在生活质量(QoL)方面,CRIF组也取得了更好的结果,包括精神(45.1 vs 55.2,p = 0.040*)和身体(31.9 vs 50.7,p < 0.001*):结论:ISS和LPF都是后盆腔环病变的不错选择,但两者之间存在一些显著差异。如果患者在创伤前没有工作,LPF 似乎更可取,因为其临床效果更好。在 Tile C3 病变中,LPF 的断裂率较低。如果选择LPF,CRIF可提供更好的临床疗效和生活质量,住院时间也更短。
{"title":"Treatment options for unstable posterior pelvic ring lesions: A multicenter retrospective cohort study of the Italian Society for the Traumatology of the Pelvis.","authors":"Domenico De Mauro, Alessandro Aprato, Federico Bove, Umberto Mezzadri, Pietro Domenico Giorgi, Alessandro Casiraghi, Claudio Galante, Rocco Erasmo, Federico Santolini, Matteo Formica, Amarildo Smakaj, Giuseppe Rovere, Michele Ceccarelli, Andrea Fidanza, Luca Faugno, Alberto Balagna, Matteo Fabbro, Lorenzo Are, Federico Moretti, Silvia Marino, Giulio Maccauro, Alessandro Massè, Francesco Liuzza","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111398","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111398","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Posterior pelvic ring lesions are a common finding in patients with pelvic trauma, representing a challenging condition for trauma surgeons. Surgical options are different and there is not yet evidence about the best option. Aim of the study are: (i) to compare Lumbopelvic fixation (LPF) and ilio-sacral screw fixation (ISS) regarding clinical and radiological outcome in unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries, both as whole population and single similar fracture types according to Tile classification (C1vsC1, C2vsC2, C3vsC3); (ii) to analyze clinical outcomes and complications in lumbopelvic fixation group, comparing open and closed reduction technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective multicenter study was performed. Data of the patients were collected. Inclusion criteria were: (i) unstable posterior ring lesions Tile C type, (ii) surgically treated either through ISS (Group A) or LPF (Group B), (iii) minimum follow-up 12 months. Radiological evaluation was made through plain radiographs in Antero-posterior (AP), inlet and outlet views. Last clinical evaluation at 12 months was assessed through Majeed Score, and quality of life (QoL) through SF-12.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group A was represented by 76 patients, and Group B by 42. Group B had better result in Majeed score for non-workers (average 60.1 ± 21.6 vs 65.0 ± 15.6, p = 0.016*). Comparing only C3-type lesions, Group A showed a higher rate of implants breakage (p = 0.032*). Other differences had p > 0.05. Comparing patients underwent open (ORIF) or closed (CRIF) reduction in Group B, CRIF group had shorter hospitalization (47.2 vs 23.4 days, p = 0.020*), an earlier full weight-bearing recovery (4.1 vs 2.6 months, p = 0.035*) and a better Majeed score in workers patients (70.3 vs 82.8, p = 0.019*). Better results for CRIF group were also recorded in quality of life (QoL), both in mental (45.1 vs 55.2, p = 0.040*) and physical outcome (31.9 vs 50.7, p < 0.001*).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ISS and LPF represent both good choices in posterior pelvic ring lesions, however some significant differences were noted. LPF seems to be preferable if the patient did not work before the trauma, due to better clinical outcome. In Tile C3 lesions, LPF have lower breakage rates. If LPF is chosen, CRIF provides better clinical outcomes, QoL and lower hospitalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":"55 Suppl 4 ","pages":"111398"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142634847","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111478
C Simonini, E Lunini, F Chiodini, G Coviello, F Bove, A Carolla, L Daci, F Ceccarelli, E Santolini, F Calderazzi, C Buono, G Vicenti, S Rammelt
Operative decision-making of tibial pilon fractures is still of great complexity. The AO Trauma Italy has investigated the trend in the management of this fractures among orthopedic surgeons in Italy. A literature-based survey focused on preoperative planning and surgical strategies has been submitted to all the participants and the results were discussed in an online webinar in light of the most recent literature with the aim to outline common treatment recommendations especially useful for young surgeons.
胫骨皮隆骨折的手术决策仍然非常复杂。意大利 AO 创伤组织调查了意大利骨科医生在处理这种骨折方面的趋势。我们向所有参与者提交了一份以术前规划和手术策略为重点的文献调查报告,并根据最新文献在在线网络研讨会上对调查结果进行了讨论,目的是概述常见的治疗建议,尤其是对年轻外科医生有用的建议。
{"title":"The management of pilon fractures: An expert survey of AO trauma Italy members and evidence-based treatment recommendations.","authors":"C Simonini, E Lunini, F Chiodini, G Coviello, F Bove, A Carolla, L Daci, F Ceccarelli, E Santolini, F Calderazzi, C Buono, G Vicenti, S Rammelt","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111478","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111478","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Operative decision-making of tibial pilon fractures is still of great complexity. The AO Trauma Italy has investigated the trend in the management of this fractures among orthopedic surgeons in Italy. A literature-based survey focused on preoperative planning and surgical strategies has been submitted to all the participants and the results were discussed in an online webinar in light of the most recent literature with the aim to outline common treatment recommendations especially useful for young surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":"55 Suppl 4 ","pages":"111478"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142634820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111342
G Scalici, M Zago, F Di Maida, G Benelli, P De Biase
Restoring of leg length and femoral offset in partial hip arthroplasty (PHA) performed by residents (level one of experience surgery) in the neck femoral fractures has a significant role in the clinical outcome. The aim of this study is to show the statistically significant differences in restoring hip geometric parameters using preoperative planning vs intraoperative X-ray. Authors compared the use of pre-operative planning with intra-operative radiography to restore the limb length and femoral offset, focused on the measurement of femoral offset and leg length discrepancy (LLD). Based on the calculation of the sample size, the number of observations required for each test group was 37 patients. For all patients were performed pre- and post-operative measurements, using mediCAD HECTET GmbH Version 5.0 software, calibrated after positioning of a radiographic landmark of 25,4 mm. The median post-operative LLD was substantially overlapping between the two group patients (1 mm vs. 1,5 mm). Statistical analyses did not find a statistically significant difference between the using of preoperative planning and intra-operative x-ray according to postoperative LLD (p = 0,06). Similarly, median change in the offset did not differ between the two groups (-2 mm vs. -1,5 mm; p = 0.69). In our experience, the combined use of pre- and intraoperative techniques appear to be viable and effective in order to restore femoral offset and minimize LLD.
在由住院医师(一级外科经验)实施的股骨颈骨折部分髋关节置换术(PHA)中,恢复腿长和股骨偏移对临床结果有重要作用。本研究旨在展示使用术前规划与术中X光检查在恢复髋关节几何参数方面的显著统计学差异。作者比较了使用术前规划和术中X射线来恢复肢体长度和股骨偏移,重点是测量股骨偏移和腿长差异(LLD)。根据样本量计算,每个测试组需要观察 37 名患者。所有患者均使用 mediCAD HECTET GmbH 5.0 版软件进行了术前和术后测量,并在定位 25.4 mm 的放射标志后进行了校准。两组患者术后 LLD 的中位数基本相同(1 毫米对 1.5 毫米)。统计分析表明,根据术后 LLD,术前规划和术中 X 光片的使用在统计学上没有显著差异(p = 0,06)。同样,偏移量的中位变化在两组之间也没有差异(-2 mm vs. -1,5 mm; p = 0.69)。根据我们的经验,联合使用术前和术中技术似乎对恢复股骨偏移和最小化LLD是可行且有效的。
{"title":"Length and offset restoration in partial hip arthroplasty (PHA) performed by resident surgeons: Comparison between preoperative planning and intraoperative X-ray.","authors":"G Scalici, M Zago, F Di Maida, G Benelli, P De Biase","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111342","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111342","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Restoring of leg length and femoral offset in partial hip arthroplasty (PHA) performed by residents (level one of experience surgery) in the neck femoral fractures has a significant role in the clinical outcome. The aim of this study is to show the statistically significant differences in restoring hip geometric parameters using preoperative planning vs intraoperative X-ray. Authors compared the use of pre-operative planning with intra-operative radiography to restore the limb length and femoral offset, focused on the measurement of femoral offset and leg length discrepancy (LLD). Based on the calculation of the sample size, the number of observations required for each test group was 37 patients. For all patients were performed pre- and post-operative measurements, using mediCAD HECTET GmbH Version 5.0 software, calibrated after positioning of a radiographic landmark of 25,4 mm. The median post-operative LLD was substantially overlapping between the two group patients (1 mm vs. 1,5 mm). Statistical analyses did not find a statistically significant difference between the using of preoperative planning and intra-operative x-ray according to postoperative LLD (p = 0,06). Similarly, median change in the offset did not differ between the two groups (-2 mm vs. -1,5 mm; p = 0.69). In our experience, the combined use of pre- and intraoperative techniques appear to be viable and effective in order to restore femoral offset and minimize LLD.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":"55 Suppl 4 ","pages":"111342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142633922","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111408
Mario Paracuollo, Filippo Rosati Tarulli, Giuseppe Pellegrino, Achille Pellegrino
Proximal femoral fractures in elderly women are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and a public health concern. Although pharmacological therapies have shown potential in improving bone mineral density (BMD) and decreasing fracture risk, the current research effort is focused on developing a procedure that can ensure both immediate and long-term efficacy. A minimally-invasive surgical approach, known as AGN1 local osteo-enhancement procedure (LOEP), has been recently developed to promote bone augmentation. The procedure implies the preparation of an enhancement site, a specific location where new bone is required within a local bony area weakened by osteoporotic bone loss, and the insertion of a triphasic, resorbable, calcium-based implant material. The results of this procedure have shown a significant and sustainable long-term increase in the proximal femur BMD and consequently in bone strength, thereby improving the femoral neck's resistance to compression and distraction forces that may result in fall-related fractures. A preliminary case series of ten women, suffering from intertrochanteric fracture and contralateral proximal femur severe osteoporotic bone loss, who underwent a combined procedure of proximal femoral nailing and AGN1 local osteo-enhancement procedure, has been developed over the course of a year of clinical and radiological data collection.
{"title":"Proximal femoral nailing for intertrochanteric fracture combined with contralateral femoral neck local osteo-enhancement procedure (LOEP) for severe osteoporotic bone loss: An original Italian case series.","authors":"Mario Paracuollo, Filippo Rosati Tarulli, Giuseppe Pellegrino, Achille Pellegrino","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111408","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111408","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Proximal femoral fractures in elderly women are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and a public health concern. Although pharmacological therapies have shown potential in improving bone mineral density (BMD) and decreasing fracture risk, the current research effort is focused on developing a procedure that can ensure both immediate and long-term efficacy. A minimally-invasive surgical approach, known as AGN1 local osteo-enhancement procedure (LOEP), has been recently developed to promote bone augmentation. The procedure implies the preparation of an enhancement site, a specific location where new bone is required within a local bony area weakened by osteoporotic bone loss, and the insertion of a triphasic, resorbable, calcium-based implant material. The results of this procedure have shown a significant and sustainable long-term increase in the proximal femur BMD and consequently in bone strength, thereby improving the femoral neck's resistance to compression and distraction forces that may result in fall-related fractures. A preliminary case series of ten women, suffering from intertrochanteric fracture and contralateral proximal femur severe osteoporotic bone loss, who underwent a combined procedure of proximal femoral nailing and AGN1 local osteo-enhancement procedure, has been developed over the course of a year of clinical and radiological data collection.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":"55 Suppl 4 ","pages":"111408"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142634694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111539
Fabrizio Rivera, Luca Costanzo Comba, Massimiliano Colombo, Francesco Benazzo, Pietro Cavaliere, Giuseppe Solarino
Proximal femoral fractures are a major public health issue due to an increasing ageing population, with an important impact on patients' quality of life. This study was designed by the Authors through a national survey with the purpuse to investigate the italian experience and practice about management and perioperative/operative trends of intracapsular proximal femoral fractures (PFF). In February-March 2022 a national survey was submitted online to the members of SIOT (Società Italiana Ortopedici e Traumatologi) and SIDA (Società Italiana dell'Anca) societies. Demographic data of the participants such as age, type of workplace and years of working experiences were registered. The questionnarie included 21 multiple choice questions about: demographic data, preoperative management, surgical indications (treatment of non-displaced and displaced fractures), management of the geriatric patient and surgical technique. Resulting data were collected and stored in a database, the results were then processed and compared with the international literature and registries. The Survey was completed by 372 surgeons; answers reported were often in accordance with the literature and national and international guidelines, with, on the other hand, important controversies regarding preoperative management (radiological studies and preoperative planning), some surgical indications and choice of stem fixation. Management of proximal femoral fractures is not always clear and univocal; it is mandatory to produce a diagnostic-therapeutic process supported by scientific evidence. In this context the SIOT Guidelines 2021 offer a real help for the surgeon managing a PPF.
{"title":"Management of intracapsular hip fracture: Current trends from a national survey.","authors":"Fabrizio Rivera, Luca Costanzo Comba, Massimiliano Colombo, Francesco Benazzo, Pietro Cavaliere, Giuseppe Solarino","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111539","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111539","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Proximal femoral fractures are a major public health issue due to an increasing ageing population, with an important impact on patients' quality of life. This study was designed by the Authors through a national survey with the purpuse to investigate the italian experience and practice about management and perioperative/operative trends of intracapsular proximal femoral fractures (PFF). In February-March 2022 a national survey was submitted online to the members of SIOT (Società Italiana Ortopedici e Traumatologi) and SIDA (Società Italiana dell'Anca) societies. Demographic data of the participants such as age, type of workplace and years of working experiences were registered. The questionnarie included 21 multiple choice questions about: demographic data, preoperative management, surgical indications (treatment of non-displaced and displaced fractures), management of the geriatric patient and surgical technique. Resulting data were collected and stored in a database, the results were then processed and compared with the international literature and registries. The Survey was completed by 372 surgeons; answers reported were often in accordance with the literature and national and international guidelines, with, on the other hand, important controversies regarding preoperative management (radiological studies and preoperative planning), some surgical indications and choice of stem fixation. Management of proximal femoral fractures is not always clear and univocal; it is mandatory to produce a diagnostic-therapeutic process supported by scientific evidence. In this context the SIOT Guidelines 2021 offer a real help for the surgeon managing a PPF.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":"55 Suppl 4 ","pages":"111539"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142633829","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Subtalar dislocation is an uncommon orthopaedic pathology, representing 1 % of all traumatic injuries of the foot and 1-2 % of all dislocations, mostly affecting young male adults. While its urgent treatment consisting in reduction and immobilization of the dislocation has been well described, disagreement exists about post-operative management with specific regards to immobilization length and rehabilitation protocols.
Materials and method: A case series of traumatic subtalar dislocations treated with urgent reduction, a mean of 4 weeks immobilization and subsequent rehabilitation is presented, with 1-year minimum clinical and subjective follow up. Also, a systematic review of the literature concerning the post-operative management following a subtalar dislocation, and subsequent results, has been performed.
Results: At 1-year minimum follow up, none of the patients presented with complications such as recurrence of dislocation or talus osteonecrosis. Tibio-talar and subtalar range of motion (ROM) were superimposable to the contralateral joints, with a maximum difference of 5°. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Score highlighted a good functionality and a full recovery in all patients but one. Pure subtalar dislocations led to better results than complicated ones. Review of current literature available on the topic demonstrated that an earlier mobilization resulted in better ROM, but the global outcome did not differ among 4 to 6 weeks of immobilization.
Discussion: Conflicting reports are present in the literature regarding the most appropriate post-reduction management of subtalar dislocations. In our case series, successful results have been obtained with a mean of 4 weeks of limb immobilization and an early rehabilitation protocol.
Conclusions: Although some limitations are present, 4 weeks immobilization appears to be the best balance between a good overall outcome and a better recovery of ROM. Further studies are needed to deepen the subject.
{"title":"Treatment and rehabilitation of subtalar dislocations: A case series and a review of the literature.","authors":"Elisa Troiano, Cristina Latino, Alessio Carlisi, Giovanni Battista Colasanti, Nicola Mondanelli, Stefano Giannotti","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111474","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111474","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Subtalar dislocation is an uncommon orthopaedic pathology, representing 1 % of all traumatic injuries of the foot and 1-2 % of all dislocations, mostly affecting young male adults. While its urgent treatment consisting in reduction and immobilization of the dislocation has been well described, disagreement exists about post-operative management with specific regards to immobilization length and rehabilitation protocols.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>A case series of traumatic subtalar dislocations treated with urgent reduction, a mean of 4 weeks immobilization and subsequent rehabilitation is presented, with 1-year minimum clinical and subjective follow up. Also, a systematic review of the literature concerning the post-operative management following a subtalar dislocation, and subsequent results, has been performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 1-year minimum follow up, none of the patients presented with complications such as recurrence of dislocation or talus osteonecrosis. Tibio-talar and subtalar range of motion (ROM) were superimposable to the contralateral joints, with a maximum difference of 5°. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Score highlighted a good functionality and a full recovery in all patients but one. Pure subtalar dislocations led to better results than complicated ones. Review of current literature available on the topic demonstrated that an earlier mobilization resulted in better ROM, but the global outcome did not differ among 4 to 6 weeks of immobilization.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Conflicting reports are present in the literature regarding the most appropriate post-reduction management of subtalar dislocations. In our case series, successful results have been obtained with a mean of 4 weeks of limb immobilization and an early rehabilitation protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although some limitations are present, 4 weeks immobilization appears to be the best balance between a good overall outcome and a better recovery of ROM. Further studies are needed to deepen the subject.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":"55 Suppl 4 ","pages":"111474"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142634824","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111406
Filippo Randelli, Manuel Giovanni Mazzoleni, Alberto Fioruzzi, Joil Ramazzotti, Martino Viganò, Giulia Volpe, Fabrizio Pace
Background and purpose: Residual axial and rotational deformities in tibial shaft fracture, after minimally invasive osteosynthesis (MIO) treatment, are widely described in literature. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of evidence about the malunion treatment strategies and results. The aim of our study is to present an innovative technique for tibial shaft malunion: a derotational proximal tibial osteotomy without removing the original plate (Plate-Retaining-Osteotomy: PR-Osteotomy).
Materials and methods: We present the results of two consecutive patients' treatment, affected by tibial shaft fracture malunion, as sequelae of MIO treatment. The two patients, male 60 years old and female 39 years old, underwent previous surgical treatment with an average of 9 months span time before surgical revision. The affected limb showed significant external torsional defect associated with gait impairment, pain and limping. The amount of rotational deformity and the bone healing condition is assessed through a methodical preoperative planning, including weight bearing lower limbs Xray and bilateral computed tomography (CT) scan of the lower limbs. The surgical technique involves a monoplanar tibial osteotomy, in a perpendicular fashion to the tibial axis, at a level that would allow at least 3 proximal screw-holes to become available for subsequent fixation. Proximal to the osteotomy line the screws are removed, while the distal ones, if stable after testing, are left in place. The amount of torsional correction, planned on CT, is reproduced intraoperatively with the assistance of graduated templates. A fibular osteotomy may be performed if required. After temporary stabilization, the correct functional reduction is checked with the aid of fluoroscopy and empirical rod measurement, using the contralateral limb alignment as a reference. Once the desired correction is achieved, absolute stability is applied to the osteotomy site. Postoperative rehabilitation protocol involves partial weight bearing for 6-8 weeks with progression to full weight bearing by 10-12 weeks.
Results: Both patients showed complete osteotomy healing at the 13th and 16th week respectively, with no complications and full recovery of normal gait and daily life activities.
Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first description of such surgical technique. Less invasiveness, fast recovery time and cost reductions are the foremost proposed benefits. Further larger case series with longer follow up are needed to assess the advantages of the proposed treatment strategy.
{"title":"Treatment of rotational tibial malunion after minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO): Corrective osteotomy with original plate retention (PR-Osteotomy).","authors":"Filippo Randelli, Manuel Giovanni Mazzoleni, Alberto Fioruzzi, Joil Ramazzotti, Martino Viganò, Giulia Volpe, Fabrizio Pace","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111406","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111406","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Residual axial and rotational deformities in tibial shaft fracture, after minimally invasive osteosynthesis (MIO) treatment, are widely described in literature. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of evidence about the malunion treatment strategies and results. The aim of our study is to present an innovative technique for tibial shaft malunion: a derotational proximal tibial osteotomy without removing the original plate (Plate-Retaining-Osteotomy: PR-Osteotomy).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We present the results of two consecutive patients' treatment, affected by tibial shaft fracture malunion, as sequelae of MIO treatment. The two patients, male 60 years old and female 39 years old, underwent previous surgical treatment with an average of 9 months span time before surgical revision. The affected limb showed significant external torsional defect associated with gait impairment, pain and limping. The amount of rotational deformity and the bone healing condition is assessed through a methodical preoperative planning, including weight bearing lower limbs Xray and bilateral computed tomography (CT) scan of the lower limbs. The surgical technique involves a monoplanar tibial osteotomy, in a perpendicular fashion to the tibial axis, at a level that would allow at least 3 proximal screw-holes to become available for subsequent fixation. Proximal to the osteotomy line the screws are removed, while the distal ones, if stable after testing, are left in place. The amount of torsional correction, planned on CT, is reproduced intraoperatively with the assistance of graduated templates. A fibular osteotomy may be performed if required. After temporary stabilization, the correct functional reduction is checked with the aid of fluoroscopy and empirical rod measurement, using the contralateral limb alignment as a reference. Once the desired correction is achieved, absolute stability is applied to the osteotomy site. Postoperative rehabilitation protocol involves partial weight bearing for 6-8 weeks with progression to full weight bearing by 10-12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both patients showed complete osteotomy healing at the 13th and 16th week respectively, with no complications and full recovery of normal gait and daily life activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>To our knowledge, this is the first description of such surgical technique. Less invasiveness, fast recovery time and cost reductions are the foremost proposed benefits. Further larger case series with longer follow up are needed to assess the advantages of the proposed treatment strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":"55 Suppl 4 ","pages":"111406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142634825","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111479
Luigi Tarallo, Marco Montemagno, Matilde Delvecchio, Lorenzo Costabile, Giuseppe Porcellini, Alessandro Donà, Grazia Ciacca, Fabio Catani
Background: Nowadays, an increasing number of Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA) surgeries have been selected as the primary intervention for distal humerus joint fractures. TEA has demonstrated favorable outcomes in elderly osteoporotic patients and has been associated with fewer complications and reduced stiffness when compared to Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) surgeries. This retrospective cohort study aimed to analyze differences in terms of functional outcomes, complications, and reoperation rates of distal fractures of the humerus treated with ORIF and TEA.
Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study.
Inclusion criteria: Closed intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus (AO/OTA type 13B and 13C); age greater than 50 years; clinical and radiological follow-up of at least 2 years. Patients were divided into two groups according to surgical treatments: ORIF and TEA. The following variables were obtained: age, sex, affected side, AO/OTA classification, follow-up time, approach, surgery duration, Range Of Motions, MEPI (Mayo Elbow Performance Index), QUICK DASH (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand), post-operative VAS (Visual Analog Scale), satisfaction rate, complications and reoperation rates. Differences in data averages between the groups were assessed, and a correlation between age and other variables in each group was calculated.
Results: 83 subjects (26 men and 57 women) were eligible and selected for the study. Average age and follow-up time were 74.8 years (+-10.6) and 83.6 months (+-42.6). Group TEA consisted of 41 patients (37 female, 4 male), mean age of 78.8 (+-8.6) with follow-up time of 83,6 months (+-42.6). Group ORIF consisted of 42 subjects (20 female, 22 male), mean age of 71.1 (+-11.6) with follow-up time of 70,6 months (+-40,6) The cohorts didn't differ significantly with any variables calculated (p > 0.05) except for complication and reoperation rates, which were significantly lower in the TEA group. Age didn't have a correlation trend associated with the variables in either group assessed independently (p > 0.05).
Conclusions: The results of the study, may guide in choosing a surgical option for distal humerus fractures in the elderly by considering TEA an alternative that is comparable to ORIF, and in selected cases an alternative that overall provides greater assurance than ORIF.
{"title":"AO/OTA B and C articular fractures of the distal humerus: What are the boundaries between Total Elbow Arthroplasty and ORIF?","authors":"Luigi Tarallo, Marco Montemagno, Matilde Delvecchio, Lorenzo Costabile, Giuseppe Porcellini, Alessandro Donà, Grazia Ciacca, Fabio Catani","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111479","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111479","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nowadays, an increasing number of Total Elbow Arthroplasty (TEA) surgeries have been selected as the primary intervention for distal humerus joint fractures. TEA has demonstrated favorable outcomes in elderly osteoporotic patients and has been associated with fewer complications and reduced stiffness when compared to Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) surgeries. This retrospective cohort study aimed to analyze differences in terms of functional outcomes, complications, and reoperation rates of distal fractures of the humerus treated with ORIF and TEA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Closed intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus (AO/OTA type 13B and 13C); age greater than 50 years; clinical and radiological follow-up of at least 2 years. Patients were divided into two groups according to surgical treatments: ORIF and TEA. The following variables were obtained: age, sex, affected side, AO/OTA classification, follow-up time, approach, surgery duration, Range Of Motions, MEPI (Mayo Elbow Performance Index), QUICK DASH (Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand), post-operative VAS (Visual Analog Scale), satisfaction rate, complications and reoperation rates. Differences in data averages between the groups were assessed, and a correlation between age and other variables in each group was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>83 subjects (26 men and 57 women) were eligible and selected for the study. Average age and follow-up time were 74.8 years (+-10.6) and 83.6 months (+-42.6). Group TEA consisted of 41 patients (37 female, 4 male), mean age of 78.8 (+-8.6) with follow-up time of 83,6 months (+-42.6). Group ORIF consisted of 42 subjects (20 female, 22 male), mean age of 71.1 (+-11.6) with follow-up time of 70,6 months (+-40,6) The cohorts didn't differ significantly with any variables calculated (p > 0.05) except for complication and reoperation rates, which were significantly lower in the TEA group. Age didn't have a correlation trend associated with the variables in either group assessed independently (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the study, may guide in choosing a surgical option for distal humerus fractures in the elderly by considering TEA an alternative that is comparable to ORIF, and in selected cases an alternative that overall provides greater assurance than ORIF.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":"55 Suppl 4 ","pages":"111479"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142633026","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111471
Luigi Meccariello, Roberta Pica, Rocco Erasmo, Mario Ronga, Francesco Ippolito, Giovanni Vicenti, Giuseppe Maccagnano, Michele Coviello, Francesco Liuzza, Giuseppe Rollo, Massimiliano Carrozzo, Giuseppe Rovere, Giuseppe Rinonapoli, Luigi Matera, Gaetano Bruno, Lorenzo Scialpi, Predrag Grubor, Federico Bove, Vincenzo Caiaffa
Introduction: Usually ipsilateral fractures of the femur and tibia are not compatible with good results and require surgery. The unsatisfactory results are more likely due to complex patterns of fractures, compromised soft tissue, associated ligament injuries, and concomitant vital organ injuries. There are many classifications to describe this type of fracture but none of them is a prognostic classification. The aim of this study is to validate our classification according to prognostic terms.
Methods: This retrospective study encloses patients accepted with a diagnosis of floating knee between January 1st 2014 and December 31th 2020. A total of 372 patients met the inclusion criteria, but only 168 patients were selected for the final review. We have reclassified the 168 patients into three classifications: according to our alphanumeric; according to the Fraser classification; according to Letts and Ran. Our classification is divided into 5 macro categories in increasing order of severity, and considering fracture site, and exposure status. The Tau B Kendall and Cohen's Kappa was used to statistically evaluate the prognostic value, reliability and reproducibility of our classification versus Fraser Classification, Letts and Ran Classification in the prognosis of these injuries.
Results: The statistical results showed that classifiying patient into macro category and sub-category it is possible to have a prognostic correlation with functional results. Noteworthy, floating knee is a complex injury with poor results.
Conclusion: The floating knee is not only the bone lesion but is above all the lesion of the soft tissues and the extensor apparatus that allow the correct functionality of the knee. These lesions do not always have favorable outcome, with respect to the nonseverity of the lesion as in Fraser's classification. Furthermore, on average these patients are subjected to an average of 6 surgical interventions; in some cases we have assisted to 23 surgical procedures. This study proved that this new classification system is prognostic, reliable and reproducible.
{"title":"Floating knee: A new prognostic classification.","authors":"Luigi Meccariello, Roberta Pica, Rocco Erasmo, Mario Ronga, Francesco Ippolito, Giovanni Vicenti, Giuseppe Maccagnano, Michele Coviello, Francesco Liuzza, Giuseppe Rollo, Massimiliano Carrozzo, Giuseppe Rovere, Giuseppe Rinonapoli, Luigi Matera, Gaetano Bruno, Lorenzo Scialpi, Predrag Grubor, Federico Bove, Vincenzo Caiaffa","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111471","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111471","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Usually ipsilateral fractures of the femur and tibia are not compatible with good results and require surgery. The unsatisfactory results are more likely due to complex patterns of fractures, compromised soft tissue, associated ligament injuries, and concomitant vital organ injuries. There are many classifications to describe this type of fracture but none of them is a prognostic classification. The aim of this study is to validate our classification according to prognostic terms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study encloses patients accepted with a diagnosis of floating knee between January 1st 2014 and December 31th 2020. A total of 372 patients met the inclusion criteria, but only 168 patients were selected for the final review. We have reclassified the 168 patients into three classifications: according to our alphanumeric; according to the Fraser classification; according to Letts and Ran. Our classification is divided into 5 macro categories in increasing order of severity, and considering fracture site, and exposure status. The Tau B Kendall and Cohen's Kappa was used to statistically evaluate the prognostic value, reliability and reproducibility of our classification versus Fraser Classification, Letts and Ran Classification in the prognosis of these injuries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The statistical results showed that classifiying patient into macro category and sub-category it is possible to have a prognostic correlation with functional results. Noteworthy, floating knee is a complex injury with poor results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The floating knee is not only the bone lesion but is above all the lesion of the soft tissues and the extensor apparatus that allow the correct functionality of the knee. These lesions do not always have favorable outcome, with respect to the nonseverity of the lesion as in Fraser's classification. Furthermore, on average these patients are subjected to an average of 6 surgical interventions; in some cases we have assisted to 23 surgical procedures. This study proved that this new classification system is prognostic, reliable and reproducible.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":"55 Suppl 4 ","pages":"111471"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142633416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}