Pub Date : 2026-02-16DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2026.113121
Daniel E Pereira, Kaitlyn S Broz, Michelle Gosselin, Joshua D Namm, Erin L Hofer, Eric R Barnard, Donald A Aboytes, Simon Y Tang, Anna N Miller
Purpose: Tibial plateau fractures are often surgically treated to restore native joint congruity and articular alignment. While these injuries portend an increased risk for end stage knee osteoarthritis, it is unknown whether the fixation constructs contribute to the development of osteoarthritis by influencing articular stress distribution following instrumentation.
Methods: We conducted a cadaver study measuring resultant intra-articular stresses of the native knee due to physiological levels of ex-vivo loading, after instrumentation with plate and screw fixation, and after implant removal. To account for variable subchondral bone density, we used 3D printed bone with osteoporotic and normal cancellous bone volume fraction, and SawBones where there is no appreciable cancellous bone.
Results: There was no statistical difference in peak, average, or total contact pressures following implant fixation and removal from the preimplantation articular pressure states in all loads and all models (p > 0.05). There was also no difference between the pressure changes of the cadaveric and Sawbones models. There were statistically significant pressure changes between cadaveric and 3D printed models following fixation, however these changes were within previously described physiologic loads (<10 MPa).
Conclusions: Subchondral instrumentation of tibial plateau fractures did not materially alter articular pressures. These findings suggest that the development of end-stage knee osteoarthritis may not be a result of altered biomechancial stresses from the instrumentation. Further, elective removal of implants is not supported by biomechanical reasons alone to reduce future risk. Supplementing cadaveric studies with patient-specific models while tuning variables can enhance the fidelity of these investigations.
Statement of clinical relevance: The findings may guide surgeons in their operative indications and clinical decision making as well as guide future biomechanical research on periarticular implant effects.
{"title":"Influence of subchondral bone density on intra-articular stresses due to fixation hardware instrumentation and removal: A biomechanical cadaver study.","authors":"Daniel E Pereira, Kaitlyn S Broz, Michelle Gosselin, Joshua D Namm, Erin L Hofer, Eric R Barnard, Donald A Aboytes, Simon Y Tang, Anna N Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113121","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2026.113121","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Tibial plateau fractures are often surgically treated to restore native joint congruity and articular alignment. While these injuries portend an increased risk for end stage knee osteoarthritis, it is unknown whether the fixation constructs contribute to the development of osteoarthritis by influencing articular stress distribution following instrumentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cadaver study measuring resultant intra-articular stresses of the native knee due to physiological levels of ex-vivo loading, after instrumentation with plate and screw fixation, and after implant removal. To account for variable subchondral bone density, we used 3D printed bone with osteoporotic and normal cancellous bone volume fraction, and SawBones where there is no appreciable cancellous bone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no statistical difference in peak, average, or total contact pressures following implant fixation and removal from the preimplantation articular pressure states in all loads and all models (p > 0.05). There was also no difference between the pressure changes of the cadaveric and Sawbones models. There were statistically significant pressure changes between cadaveric and 3D printed models following fixation, however these changes were within previously described physiologic loads (<10 MPa).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subchondral instrumentation of tibial plateau fractures did not materially alter articular pressures. These findings suggest that the development of end-stage knee osteoarthritis may not be a result of altered biomechancial stresses from the instrumentation. Further, elective removal of implants is not supported by biomechanical reasons alone to reduce future risk. Supplementing cadaveric studies with patient-specific models while tuning variables can enhance the fidelity of these investigations.</p><p><strong>Statement of clinical relevance: </strong>The findings may guide surgeons in their operative indications and clinical decision making as well as guide future biomechanical research on periarticular implant effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":"57 4","pages":"113121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147488960","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Injury-related readmissions related to an index injury admission impose significant burden on patients, families, and health systems. Understanding predictors of short-, medium-, and long-term injury-related readmissions can inform strategies to mitigate risk and guide early interventions. This study examines injury-related readmission patterns and predictors among transport-injured patients in Queensland, Australia.
Methods: A population-based, epidemiological data-linkage study was conducted using hospital administrative records for transport-related injury admissions between 2011 and 2021. Index admissions were identified, and subsequent injury-related readmissions were classified using time- and diagnosis-based logic. Outcomes included three time frames for readmissions: within 31-days, 90-days, and 1-year post-discharge. Parametric survival analysis with a Gompertz distribution assessed predictors of injury-related readmission, and dominance analysis quantified the relative importance of these predictors. Predictors spanned six domains: sociodemographic factors, healthcare funder, hospital characteristics, injury-specific attributes, injury mechanism, and geographic factors.
Results: Among 89,611 patients with transport-related injury admissions, 7.2% were readmitted for injury-related conditions within 31 days, 10.5% within 90 days, and 17.2% within one year. Mean time-to-readmission was 11, 25, and 92 days for the respective timeframes. Motor vehicle crashes were the most common transport-related injury mechanism, but had the lowest injury-related readmission rates compared to bicycle, motorcycle, and pedestrian injuries. Dominance analysis indicated that injury characteristics, particularly nature of injury, were the strongest predictors of injury-related readmission, with nature, body region and injury mechanism collectively explaining 67.5% to 83.2% of variation across timeframes.
Conclusion: Injury-related readmissions after transport-related injury occur most frequently within the first month post-discharge but persist up to one year. Injury characteristics dominate predictive influence, suggesting that interventions targeting these factors may reduce both short- and long-term injury-related readmission risk. These findings highlight opportunities for tailored discharge planning and early intervention strategies to alleviate patient and system burden.
{"title":"Beyond acute care: A time-to-event analysis of injury-related readmissions after a transport-related injury.","authors":"Kirsten Vallmuur, Jacelle Warren, Shahera Banu, Clifford Afoakwah","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113091","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2026.113091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Injury-related readmissions related to an index injury admission impose significant burden on patients, families, and health systems. Understanding predictors of short-, medium-, and long-term injury-related readmissions can inform strategies to mitigate risk and guide early interventions. This study examines injury-related readmission patterns and predictors among transport-injured patients in Queensland, Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population-based, epidemiological data-linkage study was conducted using hospital administrative records for transport-related injury admissions between 2011 and 2021. Index admissions were identified, and subsequent injury-related readmissions were classified using time- and diagnosis-based logic. Outcomes included three time frames for readmissions: within 31-days, 90-days, and 1-year post-discharge. Parametric survival analysis with a Gompertz distribution assessed predictors of injury-related readmission, and dominance analysis quantified the relative importance of these predictors. Predictors spanned six domains: sociodemographic factors, healthcare funder, hospital characteristics, injury-specific attributes, injury mechanism, and geographic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 89,611 patients with transport-related injury admissions, 7.2% were readmitted for injury-related conditions within 31 days, 10.5% within 90 days, and 17.2% within one year. Mean time-to-readmission was 11, 25, and 92 days for the respective timeframes. Motor vehicle crashes were the most common transport-related injury mechanism, but had the lowest injury-related readmission rates compared to bicycle, motorcycle, and pedestrian injuries. Dominance analysis indicated that injury characteristics, particularly nature of injury, were the strongest predictors of injury-related readmission, with nature, body region and injury mechanism collectively explaining 67.5% to 83.2% of variation across timeframes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Injury-related readmissions after transport-related injury occur most frequently within the first month post-discharge but persist up to one year. Injury characteristics dominate predictive influence, suggesting that interventions targeting these factors may reduce both short- and long-term injury-related readmission risk. These findings highlight opportunities for tailored discharge planning and early intervention strategies to alleviate patient and system burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":" ","pages":"113091"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146196267","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2026.113089
John K Yue, Allen Y Fu, Mahmoud M Elguindy, Thomas A van Essen, Shawn R Eagle, David J Caldwell, Mary J Vassar, Patrick J Belton, Christine J Gotthardt, Shubhayu Bhattacharyay, Jason E Chung, Gabriela G Satris, Rick J G Vreeburg, Andrea L C Schneider, Austin Lui, Debbie Y Madhok, Cathra Halabi, Adam R Ferguson, Michael C Huang, Phiroz E Tarapore, Anthony M DiGiorgio, Amy J Markowitz, Claudia S Robertson, Pratik Mukherjee, Esther L Yuh, Michael A McCrea, Ann-Christine Duhaime, H E Hinson, Ava M Puccio, Alex B Valadka, David O Okonkwo, Xiaoying Sun, Sonia Jain, Geoffrey T Manley
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Neuroworsening portends poor outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and is protocolized in intensive care unit (ICU) settings. The utility of neuroworsening assessments in non-ICU settings for intervention and prognostication requires further understanding. This study assessed relationships among neuroworsening in the emergency department (ED), clinicoradiological injury, blood-based biomarkers, neurosurgical interventions, and outcomes in TBI patients without Glasgow Coma Scale-Motor Score (GCS-M) impairment at ED arrival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult subjects from the 18-center Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI; ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02119182) Study with ED arrival GCS-M = 6 and ED disposition GCS-M were analyzed. Neuroworsening was defined as ED disposition GCS-M < 6. Subjects received clinically-indicated head computed tomography (CT) scan within 24-hours (h) post-TBI. Clinical characteristics, acute plasma TBI biomarker levels (glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin c-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1); pg/ml), neurosurgical procedural interventions, hospital outcomes, and 3- and 6-month outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)) were compared. Multivariable logistic regressions examined predictors of neurosurgical interventions and unfavorable outcomes (GOSE ≤ 4) using adjusted odds ratios (AOR [95 % confidence intervals (CI)]). Cox proportional hazards model examined hospital discharge rate over time using adjusted hazard ratios (AHR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 1210 subjects, 36 (3.0 %) had ED neuroworsening. Neuroworsening was associated with features of more severe injuries, including ICU admission (91.7 % vs. 30.3 %, p < 0.0001), post-traumatic amnesia duration (>24 h: 26.7 % vs. 4.2 %, p < 0.0001), and traumatic intracranial injuries on CT (72.2 % vs. 39.7 %, p = 0.00020). Neuroworsening subjects had higher GFAP (median = 1400 [Q1-Q3:864-3663] vs. 306 [82-839], p < 0.0001) and UCH-L1 (median = 459 [287-1036] vs. 170 [94-322], p < 0.0001), neurosurgical procedural interventions (38.9 % vs. 2.1 %, p < 0.0001), in-hospital mortality (8.6 % vs. 1.0 %, p = 0.018), hospital length of stay (6.9 days [Q1-Q3:4.8-16.8] vs. 2.2 days [1.3-4.0], p < 0.0001), and 3- and 6-month unfavorable outcomes (26.1 % vs. 3.5 %, p = 0.00040; 26.1 % vs. 3.7 %, p = 0.00050). Neuroworsening independently predicted neurosurgical interventions (AOR = 18.7 [95 % CI: 7.9-44.1], p < 0.0001), lower discharge rate [AHR = 0.35 [0.24-0.50], p < 0.0001), 3-month unfavorable outcome (AOR = 9.8 [3.0-31.9], p = 0.00010), and 6-month unfavorable outcome (AOR = 11.0 [3.1-38.7], p = 0.00020).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ED neuroworsening is an early indicator of clinicoradiological TBI severity, and predicted neurosurgical procedural interventions, longer hospitalizations, and 3- and 6-month unfavorable outcomes. Higher blood-based TBI biomarker levels were
目的:神经恶化预示着创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的不良预后,并在重症监护病房(ICU)中得到处理。神经恶化评估在非icu环境中的干预和预测的效用需要进一步了解。本研究评估了急诊科(ED)神经恶化、临床放射损伤、血液生物标志物、神经外科干预和到达ED时无格拉斯哥昏迷量表-运动评分(GCS-M)损伤的TBI患者预后之间的关系。方法:来自18中心创伤性脑损伤临床知识转化研究(TRACK-TBI; ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02119182)的成人受试者,对ED到达GCS-M = 6和ED处置GCS-M进行分析。神经恶化定义为ED倾向GCS-M < 6。受试者在tbi后24小时内接受临床指示的头部计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描。临床特征、急性血浆TBI生物标志物水平(胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)、泛素c端水解酶- l1 (UCH-L1));pg/ml)、神经外科手术干预、医院结局、3个月和6个月结局(格拉斯哥结局量表扩展(GOSE))进行比较。多变量logistic回归采用校正优势比(AOR[95%置信区间(CI)])检验神经外科干预和不良结局(GOSE≤4)的预测因子。Cox比例风险模型使用调整风险比(AHR)检查医院出院率随时间的变化。结果:1210例受试者中,36例(3.0%)出现ED神经恶化。神经恶化与更严重损伤的特征相关,包括ICU入院(91.7% vs. 30.3%, p < 0.0001),创伤后遗忘持续时间(>24小时:26.7% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.0001), CT显示的创伤性颅内损伤(72.2% vs. 39.7%, p = 0.00020)。Neuroworsening受试者GFAP更高(值= 1400 (q1 - q3:864 - 3663)与306年(82 - 839),p < 0.0001)和UCH-L1(值= 459(287 - 1036)与170年(94 - 322),p < 0.0001),神经外科程序干预(38.9%比2.1%,p < 0.0001),住院死亡率(8.6%比1.0%,p = 0.018),医院住院时间(6.9天(q1 - q3:4.8 - 16.8)和2.2天(1.3 - -4.0),p < 0.0001),和3 - 6个月不利结果(26.1%比3.5%,p = 0.00040; 26.1%比3.7%,p = 0.00050)。神经恶化独立预测神经外科干预(AOR = 18.7 [95% CI: 7.9-44.1], p < 0.0001)、较低出院率[AHR = 0.35 [0.24-0.50], p < 0.0001)、3个月不良结局(AOR = 9.8 [3.0-31.9], p = 0.00010)和6个月不良结局(AOR = 11.0 [3.1-38.7], p = 0.00020)。结论:ED神经恶化是临床放射学TBI严重程度的早期指标,预示着神经外科手术干预、更长的住院时间以及3个月和6个月的不良结果。较高的血液TBI生物标志物水平与ED神经恶化相关,表明它们在帮助评估神经系统恶化高风险TBI患者方面的潜在作用。
{"title":"Neuroworsening from a normal Glasgow Coma Scale Motor Score in the emergency department is an early predictor of neurosurgical intervention, hospital outcomes, and longitudinal disability in traumatic brain injury: A TRACK-TBI Study.","authors":"John K Yue, Allen Y Fu, Mahmoud M Elguindy, Thomas A van Essen, Shawn R Eagle, David J Caldwell, Mary J Vassar, Patrick J Belton, Christine J Gotthardt, Shubhayu Bhattacharyay, Jason E Chung, Gabriela G Satris, Rick J G Vreeburg, Andrea L C Schneider, Austin Lui, Debbie Y Madhok, Cathra Halabi, Adam R Ferguson, Michael C Huang, Phiroz E Tarapore, Anthony M DiGiorgio, Amy J Markowitz, Claudia S Robertson, Pratik Mukherjee, Esther L Yuh, Michael A McCrea, Ann-Christine Duhaime, H E Hinson, Ava M Puccio, Alex B Valadka, David O Okonkwo, Xiaoying Sun, Sonia Jain, Geoffrey T Manley","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113089","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113089","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Neuroworsening portends poor outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI) and is protocolized in intensive care unit (ICU) settings. The utility of neuroworsening assessments in non-ICU settings for intervention and prognostication requires further understanding. This study assessed relationships among neuroworsening in the emergency department (ED), clinicoradiological injury, blood-based biomarkers, neurosurgical interventions, and outcomes in TBI patients without Glasgow Coma Scale-Motor Score (GCS-M) impairment at ED arrival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult subjects from the 18-center Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI; ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02119182) Study with ED arrival GCS-M = 6 and ED disposition GCS-M were analyzed. Neuroworsening was defined as ED disposition GCS-M < 6. Subjects received clinically-indicated head computed tomography (CT) scan within 24-hours (h) post-TBI. Clinical characteristics, acute plasma TBI biomarker levels (glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin c-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1); pg/ml), neurosurgical procedural interventions, hospital outcomes, and 3- and 6-month outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE)) were compared. Multivariable logistic regressions examined predictors of neurosurgical interventions and unfavorable outcomes (GOSE ≤ 4) using adjusted odds ratios (AOR [95 % confidence intervals (CI)]). Cox proportional hazards model examined hospital discharge rate over time using adjusted hazard ratios (AHR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 1210 subjects, 36 (3.0 %) had ED neuroworsening. Neuroworsening was associated with features of more severe injuries, including ICU admission (91.7 % vs. 30.3 %, p < 0.0001), post-traumatic amnesia duration (>24 h: 26.7 % vs. 4.2 %, p < 0.0001), and traumatic intracranial injuries on CT (72.2 % vs. 39.7 %, p = 0.00020). Neuroworsening subjects had higher GFAP (median = 1400 [Q1-Q3:864-3663] vs. 306 [82-839], p < 0.0001) and UCH-L1 (median = 459 [287-1036] vs. 170 [94-322], p < 0.0001), neurosurgical procedural interventions (38.9 % vs. 2.1 %, p < 0.0001), in-hospital mortality (8.6 % vs. 1.0 %, p = 0.018), hospital length of stay (6.9 days [Q1-Q3:4.8-16.8] vs. 2.2 days [1.3-4.0], p < 0.0001), and 3- and 6-month unfavorable outcomes (26.1 % vs. 3.5 %, p = 0.00040; 26.1 % vs. 3.7 %, p = 0.00050). Neuroworsening independently predicted neurosurgical interventions (AOR = 18.7 [95 % CI: 7.9-44.1], p < 0.0001), lower discharge rate [AHR = 0.35 [0.24-0.50], p < 0.0001), 3-month unfavorable outcome (AOR = 9.8 [3.0-31.9], p = 0.00010), and 6-month unfavorable outcome (AOR = 11.0 [3.1-38.7], p = 0.00020).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ED neuroworsening is an early indicator of clinicoradiological TBI severity, and predicted neurosurgical procedural interventions, longer hospitalizations, and 3- and 6-month unfavorable outcomes. Higher blood-based TBI biomarker levels were ","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":" ","pages":"113089"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146168421","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2026.113090
James E Moore, Elaine Cole, Belinda J Gabbe
Background: Major trauma centres generally deliver better outcomes than non-specialist centres, but whether this association holds true in New Zealand, a country with challenging geography and a dispersed population, is uncertain.
Aims: The aim of this study was to determine whether definitive care at a tertiary trauma hospital compared with a regional (non-tertiary) hospital was associated with improved survival in patients with major trauma in New Zealand. We also aimed to identify factors that predict transfer from a regional hospital to a tertiary centre.
Methods: A registry-based cohort study of adults with major trauma was conducted using data from the New Zealand Trauma Registry. All patients who were in a tertiary hospital at any time during their hospitalisation were considered to have received definitive care in a tertiary centre. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality during the index hospitalisation episode (including where a hospitalisation episode included care in multiple hospitals). Secondary outcomes were 30 and 90-day mortality, requirement for secondary transfer, and discharge destination. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between definitive care hospital level and in-hospital mortality, and to identify factors associated with secondary transfer.
Results: 10,001 major trauma patients were identified, with inpatient case fatality rate of 11.1% (regional hospitals 12.7%, tertiary hospitals 10.5%; P = 0.001). After risk adjustment, definitive care at a tertiary trauma hospital was associated with substantially lower odds of in-hospital death compared with regional hospitals (adjusted odds ratio 0.68 [95% CI, 0.57-0.82]; P < 0.001). Factors associated with secondary inter-hospital transfer included intubation, injury due to falls, Māori ethnicity, higher injury severity, and younger age.
Conclusion: Definitive care provided at a tertiary trauma hospital was associated with decreased odds of mortality in major trauma patients in New Zealand, indicating the importance of improving equity of access to specialised trauma care for patients suffering from serious injuries.
背景:主要创伤中心通常比非专业中心提供更好的结果,但这种联系是否适用于新西兰,一个具有挑战性的地理和分散的人口的国家,是不确定的。目的:本研究的目的是确定三级创伤医院与区域(非三级)医院的最终护理是否与新西兰严重创伤患者的生存率提高有关。我们还旨在确定预测从地区医院转移到三级中心的因素。方法:使用新西兰创伤登记处的数据,对严重创伤的成年人进行了一项基于登记的队列研究。所有在三级医院住院期间任何时间的病人都被认为在三级医院接受了最终护理。主要终点是指数住院期间的住院死亡率(包括住院期间包括在多家医院接受治疗的情况)。次要结局为30天和90天死亡率、二次转院要求和出院目的地。多变量logistic回归分析用于评估最终护理医院水平与院内死亡率之间的关系,并确定与继发性转移相关的因素。结果:共发现严重创伤患者1001例,住院病死率为11.1%(地方医院12.7%,三级医院10.5%,P = 0.001)。经过风险调整后,三级创伤医院的最终护理与地区医院相比,院内死亡的几率显著降低(调整后的优势比为0.68 [95% CI, 0.57-0.82]; P < 0.001)。与二次院间转院相关的因素包括插管、跌倒损伤、Māori种族、损伤严重程度较高和年龄较小。结论:在新西兰,三级创伤医院提供的最终护理与严重创伤患者死亡率的降低有关,这表明提高严重受伤患者获得专门创伤护理的公平性至关重要。
{"title":"Outcomes of major trauma patients by hospital level of care in New Zealand.","authors":"James E Moore, Elaine Cole, Belinda J Gabbe","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2026.113090","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major trauma centres generally deliver better outcomes than non-specialist centres, but whether this association holds true in New Zealand, a country with challenging geography and a dispersed population, is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine whether definitive care at a tertiary trauma hospital compared with a regional (non-tertiary) hospital was associated with improved survival in patients with major trauma in New Zealand. We also aimed to identify factors that predict transfer from a regional hospital to a tertiary centre.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A registry-based cohort study of adults with major trauma was conducted using data from the New Zealand Trauma Registry. All patients who were in a tertiary hospital at any time during their hospitalisation were considered to have received definitive care in a tertiary centre. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality during the index hospitalisation episode (including where a hospitalisation episode included care in multiple hospitals). Secondary outcomes were 30 and 90-day mortality, requirement for secondary transfer, and discharge destination. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between definitive care hospital level and in-hospital mortality, and to identify factors associated with secondary transfer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>10,001 major trauma patients were identified, with inpatient case fatality rate of 11.1% (regional hospitals 12.7%, tertiary hospitals 10.5%; P = 0.001). After risk adjustment, definitive care at a tertiary trauma hospital was associated with substantially lower odds of in-hospital death compared with regional hospitals (adjusted odds ratio 0.68 [95% CI, 0.57-0.82]; P < 0.001). Factors associated with secondary inter-hospital transfer included intubation, injury due to falls, Māori ethnicity, higher injury severity, and younger age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Definitive care provided at a tertiary trauma hospital was associated with decreased odds of mortality in major trauma patients in New Zealand, indicating the importance of improving equity of access to specialised trauma care for patients suffering from serious injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":" ","pages":"113090"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146198329","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2026.113080
Charles DiMaggio, Paige Curcio, Natalie Escobar, Ana M Velez-Rosborough, Julia Burstein, Marko Bukur, Spiros G Frangos, Ashley C Pfaff
Introduction: To help address the continuing epidemic of firearm-related trauma in the United States (US), we conducted a detailed analysis of recent trauma center discharge data and compared firearm-related injuries to mechanisms such as falls, pedestrian injuries, and motor vehicle crashes.
Methods: We combined Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) data for 2011 to 2022 and analyzed variables for patient demographics, injury mechanisms, disposition, and hospital characteristics over time. Analyses consisted of descriptive statistics, bar plots, time series plots, and comparative tables.
Results: There were 3,597,688 US trauma hospital discharges in the TQIP data set for 2011 to 2022 of which 307,062 (8.4%) involved firearms-a higher proportion than those involving pedestrian injuries (3.8%), pedal cycles (2.0%), or motorcycles (6.2%). The case-fatality rate of inpatient hospital deaths for firearm injuries was 8.8%, surpassed only by that of pedestrian injuries (9.9%). Firearms accounted for the youngest patient population over the 12-year study period for the six injury mechanisms analyzed. Over time, firearm-related assaults increased from 75.7% of all firearm injuries in 2011 to 88.6% in 2020. Most, if not all, of this increase appeared to occur in the post-2014 time period.
Conclusions: Better defining national injury trends allows for targeted injury prevention efforts, prioritized research endeavors, and optimized resource allocation.
{"title":"The epidemiology of firearm-related injuries in the united states compared to other mechanisms: Recent trends in trauma center hospital discharges.","authors":"Charles DiMaggio, Paige Curcio, Natalie Escobar, Ana M Velez-Rosborough, Julia Burstein, Marko Bukur, Spiros G Frangos, Ashley C Pfaff","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2026.113080","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To help address the continuing epidemic of firearm-related trauma in the United States (US), we conducted a detailed analysis of recent trauma center discharge data and compared firearm-related injuries to mechanisms such as falls, pedestrian injuries, and motor vehicle crashes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We combined Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) data for 2011 to 2022 and analyzed variables for patient demographics, injury mechanisms, disposition, and hospital characteristics over time. Analyses consisted of descriptive statistics, bar plots, time series plots, and comparative tables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 3,597,688 US trauma hospital discharges in the TQIP data set for 2011 to 2022 of which 307,062 (8.4%) involved firearms-a higher proportion than those involving pedestrian injuries (3.8%), pedal cycles (2.0%), or motorcycles (6.2%). The case-fatality rate of inpatient hospital deaths for firearm injuries was 8.8%, surpassed only by that of pedestrian injuries (9.9%). Firearms accounted for the youngest patient population over the 12-year study period for the six injury mechanisms analyzed. Over time, firearm-related assaults increased from 75.7% of all firearm injuries in 2011 to 88.6% in 2020. Most, if not all, of this increase appeared to occur in the post-2014 time period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Better defining national injury trends allows for targeted injury prevention efforts, prioritized research endeavors, and optimized resource allocation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":" ","pages":"113080"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146138230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: The Noto Peninsula earthquake of January 1, 2024, was the most destructive seismic event in Japan since 2011, affecting a region characterized by its super-aging population, geographical isolation, and status as a medically underserved area. These vulnerabilities require a detailed analysis of the acute-phase medical response to improve disaster preparedness in similar environments. This study aims to characterize the morbidity and features of earthquake-affected patients admitted to a regional tertiary university hospital.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients presenting to the emergency department of Kanazawa University Hospital between January 1, 2024, and January 31, 2024, with earthquake-related conditions. Patients with direct trauma or secondary health issues (e.g., exacerbation of chronic illness) were identified by a multidisciplinary Disaster Response Committee. All patients were triaged using the Japan Triage and Acuity Scale (JTAS). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographics, clinical characteristics, and transport modalities.
Results: A total of 144 earthquake-related patients were managed. The cohort was characterized by a high mean age (79.7 years) and a female predominance (61.1%). The primary medical burden was the exacerbation of intrinsic diseases (74.3%), while trauma cases were less frequent (23.6%). The majority of patients presented with low to moderate acuity; severe cases (JTAS Levels 1-2) constituted 7.0% of the cohort, whereas low-acuity Level 4 was the largest (63.2%). Patient transport peaked on day five, almost exclusively by air evacuation (97.7% of arrivals that day), which was essential to overcome extensive road damage. The base-isolated hospital sustained no major damage and remained fully operational, serving as a regional DMAT command post.
Conclusions: The medical response to the Noto earthquake highlights a paradigm shift in disaster care for aging societies, where management of geriatric and chronic diseases takes precedence over mass-casualty trauma care. In isolated regions, air evacuation is a critical yet weather-vulnerable modality for effective patient transport. Future disaster preparedness requires a dual focus: medical response plans must prioritize systems for chronic and geriatric care, and strategic investment in seismically resilient tertiary hospitals is essential for them to function as stable operational hubs, ensuring regional continuity of care.
{"title":"Clinical characteristics and triage acuity of patients at Kanazawa university hospital after the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake.","authors":"Tadayuki Hirai, Yuki Sakurai, Rena Kitayama, Hirotaka Yonezawa, Akira Tamai, Taichiro Minami, Masayuki Mori, Hirofumi Okada, Takashi Kusayama, Satoshi Takada, Tatsunori Ikeda, Toru Noda, Masaki Okajima","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113082","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2026.113082","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Noto Peninsula earthquake of January 1, 2024, was the most destructive seismic event in Japan since 2011, affecting a region characterized by its super-aging population, geographical isolation, and status as a medically underserved area. These vulnerabilities require a detailed analysis of the acute-phase medical response to improve disaster preparedness in similar environments. This study aims to characterize the morbidity and features of earthquake-affected patients admitted to a regional tertiary university hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients presenting to the emergency department of Kanazawa University Hospital between January 1, 2024, and January 31, 2024, with earthquake-related conditions. Patients with direct trauma or secondary health issues (e.g., exacerbation of chronic illness) were identified by a multidisciplinary Disaster Response Committee. All patients were triaged using the Japan Triage and Acuity Scale (JTAS). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographics, clinical characteristics, and transport modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 144 earthquake-related patients were managed. The cohort was characterized by a high mean age (79.7 years) and a female predominance (61.1%). The primary medical burden was the exacerbation of intrinsic diseases (74.3%), while trauma cases were less frequent (23.6%). The majority of patients presented with low to moderate acuity; severe cases (JTAS Levels 1-2) constituted 7.0% of the cohort, whereas low-acuity Level 4 was the largest (63.2%). Patient transport peaked on day five, almost exclusively by air evacuation (97.7% of arrivals that day), which was essential to overcome extensive road damage. The base-isolated hospital sustained no major damage and remained fully operational, serving as a regional DMAT command post.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The medical response to the Noto earthquake highlights a paradigm shift in disaster care for aging societies, where management of geriatric and chronic diseases takes precedence over mass-casualty trauma care. In isolated regions, air evacuation is a critical yet weather-vulnerable modality for effective patient transport. Future disaster preparedness requires a dual focus: medical response plans must prioritize systems for chronic and geriatric care, and strategic investment in seismically resilient tertiary hospitals is essential for them to function as stable operational hubs, ensuring regional continuity of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":" ","pages":"113082"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146133800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-30DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2026.113076
Alexandra Harvey, Dwayne Kellman, Charles C Branas
Introduction: Rapid economic growth may impact trauma mortality. We investigated the epidemiology, risk factors and trends in hospital mortality of admitted trauma patients in Guyana during a 5-year period of rapid economic growth in this country.
Patients and methods: The study was conducted at the Georgetown Public Hospital Corporation, Guyana's largest tertiary healthcare facility. The medical records of all patients admitted following trauma between 2018 and 2022 were reviewed. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and clinical outcomes (mortality and length of stay) were obtained for each study year. Univariate analyses assessed the distributions of all variables while adjusted regression analyses were used to identify potential risk factors for in-hospital mortality. P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results: The in-hospital mortality rate was 3.5% (n=190). The highest in-hospital mortality rate occurred among burns patients (11.2%), and the lowest from assaults (1.9%). Risk factors for death were mechanism of injury, ethnicity, injury severity at presentation, and age. The leading mechanisms of injury for trauma-related deaths were motor vehicle crashes (39.5%) and falls (24.7%). Females had over twice the rate of death from falls compared to males (6.3% vs. 3.1%). Among ethnicities, Indo-Guyanese patients had the highest odds of dying from trauma compared to Afro-Guyanese (OR 2.37 CI 1.57-3.56, p<0.01) primarily driven by motor vehicle crashes (OR 3.29, CI 1.65, 6.55 p<0.01). The median (Q1, Q3) length of stay was 3 (1, 6) days. Most patients (73.5%) died within 7 days of admission. Late deaths (≥24h of admission) occurred in 53.6% of patients. Annual mortality rates fluctuated during the study period coinciding with Covid -19 restrictions but rose overall by 86.5% from 3.7% in 2018 to 6.9% in 2022. Annual comparisons of mortality rate with GDP growth rate showed parallel increases over most of the study period.
Conclusion: This study provides evidence to support targeted clinical practice and public health initiatives to prevent increases in trauma mortality in Guyana and other rapidly developing countries facing rising injury risks.
快速的经济增长可能影响创伤死亡率。在圭亚那经济快速增长的5年期间,我们调查了该国住院创伤患者的流行病学、危险因素和住院死亡率趋势。患者和方法:该研究是在圭亚那最大的三级医疗机构乔治敦公立医院公司进行的。回顾了2018年至2022年期间入院的所有创伤患者的医疗记录。获得每个研究年度的患者人口统计、损伤特征和临床结果(死亡率和住院时间)。单因素分析评估了所有变量的分布,而调整回归分析用于确定住院死亡率的潜在危险因素。p值≤0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:住院死亡率为3.5% (n=190)。住院死亡率最高的是烧伤患者(11.2%),最低的是殴打患者(1.9%)。死亡的危险因素有损伤机制、种族、发病时损伤严重程度和年龄。创伤相关死亡的主要伤害机制是机动车碰撞(39.5%)和跌倒(24.7%)。女性的跌倒死亡率是男性的两倍多(6.3%对3.1%)。在种族中,印度-圭亚那患者与非洲-圭亚那患者相比,死于创伤的几率最高(OR 2.37 CI 1.57-3.56)。结论:本研究为支持有针对性的临床实践和公共卫生举措提供了证据,以防止圭亚那和其他快速发展中国家创伤死亡率的增加,这些国家面临着不断上升的伤害风险。
{"title":"In-patient outcomes after trauma in a rapidly developing nation.","authors":"Alexandra Harvey, Dwayne Kellman, Charles C Branas","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113076","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2026.113076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rapid economic growth may impact trauma mortality. We investigated the epidemiology, risk factors and trends in hospital mortality of admitted trauma patients in Guyana during a 5-year period of rapid economic growth in this country.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study was conducted at the Georgetown Public Hospital Corporation, Guyana's largest tertiary healthcare facility. The medical records of all patients admitted following trauma between 2018 and 2022 were reviewed. Patient demographics, injury characteristics, and clinical outcomes (mortality and length of stay) were obtained for each study year. Univariate analyses assessed the distributions of all variables while adjusted regression analyses were used to identify potential risk factors for in-hospital mortality. P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The in-hospital mortality rate was 3.5% (n=190). The highest in-hospital mortality rate occurred among burns patients (11.2%), and the lowest from assaults (1.9%). Risk factors for death were mechanism of injury, ethnicity, injury severity at presentation, and age. The leading mechanisms of injury for trauma-related deaths were motor vehicle crashes (39.5%) and falls (24.7%). Females had over twice the rate of death from falls compared to males (6.3% vs. 3.1%). Among ethnicities, Indo-Guyanese patients had the highest odds of dying from trauma compared to Afro-Guyanese (OR 2.37 CI 1.57-3.56, p<0.01) primarily driven by motor vehicle crashes (OR 3.29, CI 1.65, 6.55 p<0.01). The median (Q1, Q3) length of stay was 3 (1, 6) days. Most patients (73.5%) died within 7 days of admission. Late deaths (≥24h of admission) occurred in 53.6% of patients. Annual mortality rates fluctuated during the study period coinciding with Covid -19 restrictions but rose overall by 86.5% from 3.7% in 2018 to 6.9% in 2022. Annual comparisons of mortality rate with GDP growth rate showed parallel increases over most of the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides evidence to support targeted clinical practice and public health initiatives to prevent increases in trauma mortality in Guyana and other rapidly developing countries facing rising injury risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":" ","pages":"113076"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146127663","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-30DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2026.113077
Nikita Quinn, Andrew McCombie, Daniel Jemberie, Sarah Logan, Duncan Finlayson, Laura R Joyce, Roger Mulder, Jenny Jordan, Christopher Wakeman
Introduction: Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is not uncommon following major trauma. Despite increasing awareness of the psychological sequelae of trauma, there is often inadequate mental health follow-up for trauma patients. This can lead to significant rates of under-diagnosis and under-treatment.
Aims: To examine rates of under-diagnosis and under-treatment of probable PTSD amongst major trauma patients admitted to Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand.
Methods: A prospective questionnaire-based cohort study including patients 16 years and older who presented to Christchurch Hospital with major trauma (Injury Severity Score >/=12) between May 2016 and September 2018. Patients with severe brain injury were excluded. Patients who consented completed the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-V (PCL-5), plus answered questions on any assessment, treatment or diagnosis of PTSD, depression or anxiety before and/or after injury. Demographic, injury-specific and hospital care data were collated from the New Zealand Major Trauma Registry.
Results: There were 836 patients who met the eligibility criteria and were invited to participate in the study, with a 24% response rate (203 patients). Thirty-seven (18%) scored at or above the PTSD threshold, however only 8 (22%) reported having received a formal diagnosis of PTSD. All 8 patients who had received a formal diagnosis of PTSD were receiving some form of mental health treatment (either medication, 'talk therapy' or both). By comparison, within the group of 29 patients who had not received a diagnosis of PTSD but met criteria, only 11 (38%) were receiving any form of mental health treatment.
Conclusion: Many people who develop PTSD following trauma fail to receive appropriate assessment, diagnosis or treatment. Further work is needed to ensure adequate systems are in place to allow identification and treatment of patients who develop PTSD following a major trauma.
{"title":"Under-diagnosis and under-treatment of post traumatic stress disorder amongst major trauma patients.","authors":"Nikita Quinn, Andrew McCombie, Daniel Jemberie, Sarah Logan, Duncan Finlayson, Laura R Joyce, Roger Mulder, Jenny Jordan, Christopher Wakeman","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113077","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2026.113077","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is not uncommon following major trauma. Despite increasing awareness of the psychological sequelae of trauma, there is often inadequate mental health follow-up for trauma patients. This can lead to significant rates of under-diagnosis and under-treatment.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To examine rates of under-diagnosis and under-treatment of probable PTSD amongst major trauma patients admitted to Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective questionnaire-based cohort study including patients 16 years and older who presented to Christchurch Hospital with major trauma (Injury Severity Score >/=12) between May 2016 and September 2018. Patients with severe brain injury were excluded. Patients who consented completed the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-V (PCL-5), plus answered questions on any assessment, treatment or diagnosis of PTSD, depression or anxiety before and/or after injury. Demographic, injury-specific and hospital care data were collated from the New Zealand Major Trauma Registry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 836 patients who met the eligibility criteria and were invited to participate in the study, with a 24% response rate (203 patients). Thirty-seven (18%) scored at or above the PTSD threshold, however only 8 (22%) reported having received a formal diagnosis of PTSD. All 8 patients who had received a formal diagnosis of PTSD were receiving some form of mental health treatment (either medication, 'talk therapy' or both). By comparison, within the group of 29 patients who had not received a diagnosis of PTSD but met criteria, only 11 (38%) were receiving any form of mental health treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many people who develop PTSD following trauma fail to receive appropriate assessment, diagnosis or treatment. Further work is needed to ensure adequate systems are in place to allow identification and treatment of patients who develop PTSD following a major trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":" ","pages":"113077"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146133820","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-26DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2026.113065
Betel Yibrehu, Mona Khalid, Bourke Tillmann, Luis da Luz, Matthew P Guttman, Andrea Phillips, Corey Freedman, Avery Nathens, Barbara Haas
Background: Early and adequate analgesia is a critical component of injury care. While sociodemographic factors have been shown to impact the adequacy of analgesia in a variety of clinical settings, these relationships are poorly understood in trauma care. Our objective was to evaluate the association between patient and provider characteristics and time to analgesia during trauma resuscitation.
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult (age ≥ 16) patients presenting as trauma activations at a level I trauma center over 2 years (2019-2020). Data were derived from the institutional trauma registry and chart review. Time from presentation to first administration of analgesia was recorded. The primary outcome was delayed analgesia, defined as analgesia administered later than the 75th percentile of time to analgesia for all patients. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of age, sex, and socioeconomic status on analgesia timing.
Results: Among 2497 patients meeting inclusion criteria (mean age 44.8 years [SD 21.6], 25.7% female), 1957 (77.5%) received analgesia in the trauma bay. Among patients who received analgesia in the trauma bay, median time to analgesia was 9 min (IQR 7-14). The only sociodemographic characteristic independently associated with delayed analgesia was age. Relative to patients aged 16-54, those aged 55-64 were 1.5-fold more likely to receive delayed analgesia (OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.05-2.03), while those aged ≥ 65 were twice as likely to have delayed analgesia (OR 2.16; 95% CI 1.58-2.95). Irrespective of age or injury severity, patients injured in falls were more likely to experience delayed analgesia (OR 1.64; 95% CI 1.20-2.23).
Conclusion: Older adults and patients injured in a fall are more likely to experience delays in receiving analgesia. Strategies that ensure equity in pain management are needed such that all patients have equitable access to early and adequate pain control after injury.
背景:早期和充分的镇痛是损伤护理的关键组成部分。虽然社会人口因素已被证明会影响各种临床环境中镇痛的充分性,但这些关系在创伤护理中却知之甚少。我们的目的是评估创伤复苏期间患者和提供者特征与镇痛时间之间的关系。方法:我们对2年(2019-2020年)在一级创伤中心表现为创伤激活的成人(年龄≥16岁)患者进行了回顾性队列研究。数据来源于机构创伤登记和图表回顾。记录从出现到第一次给药的时间。主要终点是延迟镇痛,定义为所有患者镇痛时间晚于第75百分位数。采用多变量logistic回归评估年龄、性别和社会经济状况对镇痛时间的影响。结果:2497例符合入选标准的患者(平均年龄44.8岁[SD 21.6],女性25.7%)中,1957例(77.5%)在创伤区接受了镇痛治疗。在创伤区接受镇痛的患者中,镇痛的中位时间为9分钟(IQR 7-14)。唯一与延迟镇痛独立相关的社会人口学特征是年龄。与16-54岁的患者相比,55-64岁的患者接受延迟镇痛的可能性是后者的1.5倍(OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.05-2.03),而≥65岁的患者接受延迟镇痛的可能性是后者的两倍(OR 2.16; 95% CI 1.58-2.95)。无论年龄或损伤严重程度如何,在跌倒中受伤的患者更有可能经历延迟性镇痛(or 1.64; 95% CI 1.20-2.23)。结论:老年人和跌倒受伤的患者更有可能延迟接受镇痛。需要确保疼痛管理公平的策略,以便所有患者在受伤后公平地获得早期和适当的疼痛控制。
{"title":"An evaluation of the association between patient sociodemographic factors and delayed time to analgesia in the trauma bay.","authors":"Betel Yibrehu, Mona Khalid, Bourke Tillmann, Luis da Luz, Matthew P Guttman, Andrea Phillips, Corey Freedman, Avery Nathens, Barbara Haas","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2026.113065","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early and adequate analgesia is a critical component of injury care. While sociodemographic factors have been shown to impact the adequacy of analgesia in a variety of clinical settings, these relationships are poorly understood in trauma care. Our objective was to evaluate the association between patient and provider characteristics and time to analgesia during trauma resuscitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult (age ≥ 16) patients presenting as trauma activations at a level I trauma center over 2 years (2019-2020). Data were derived from the institutional trauma registry and chart review. Time from presentation to first administration of analgesia was recorded. The primary outcome was delayed analgesia, defined as analgesia administered later than the 75th percentile of time to analgesia for all patients. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of age, sex, and socioeconomic status on analgesia timing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2497 patients meeting inclusion criteria (mean age 44.8 years [SD 21.6], 25.7% female), 1957 (77.5%) received analgesia in the trauma bay. Among patients who received analgesia in the trauma bay, median time to analgesia was 9 min (IQR 7-14). The only sociodemographic characteristic independently associated with delayed analgesia was age. Relative to patients aged 16-54, those aged 55-64 were 1.5-fold more likely to receive delayed analgesia (OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.05-2.03), while those aged ≥ 65 were twice as likely to have delayed analgesia (OR 2.16; 95% CI 1.58-2.95). Irrespective of age or injury severity, patients injured in falls were more likely to experience delayed analgesia (OR 1.64; 95% CI 1.20-2.23).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older adults and patients injured in a fall are more likely to experience delays in receiving analgesia. Strategies that ensure equity in pain management are needed such that all patients have equitable access to early and adequate pain control after injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":" ","pages":"113065"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146127655","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-22DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2026.113058
Paula Cella Giacometto, Miyoko Massago, Luiz Gustavo de Paulo, Mileni de Camargo Francisco, Mauricio Medeiros Lemos, Gerson Zanusso Junior, Edvaldo Vieira de Campos, Vlaudimir Dias Marques, Sanderland José Tavares Gurgel, Luciano de Andrade
Introduction: Prehospital erythrocyte transfusion, well-established in the management of hemorrhagic shock in developed countries, was incorporated into trauma care in Brazil in 2022, representing a significant advance in the treatment of severe trauma. This study aimed to describe the clinical profile of patients with severe trauma who received prehospital erythrocyte transfusion by the SAMU aeromedical team in a health macro-region in Southern Brazil.
Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study (2022-2024) included patients with severe trauma treated by a regional SAMU aeromedical team who received prehospital erythrocyte transfusion at the trauma scene. Clinical, laboratory, and hemodynamic variables were collected, including prehospital and hospital shock index values. The primary outcome was 24-hour mortality. Associations with early mortality were explored using Fisher's exact test with exact odds ratios. Changes in shock index between prehospital and hospital moments were evaluated with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, while differences between survivors and non-survivors were assessed with the Mann-Whitney test.
Results: Results: Thirty-eight patients were included, and 10 (26%) died within 24 hours. Prehospital erythrocyte transfusion was associated with a significant reduction in shock index, decreasing from a median of 1.85 (IQR 1.53-2.40) at the scene to 1.15 (IQR 0.90-1.68) on hospital arrival (p < 0.001), with no difference in the magnitude of reduction between survivors and non-survivors (p = 0.38). Non-survivors presented a more unfavorable metabolic profile on admission, with lower base excess and hematocrit and higher lactate levels. Older age (≥60 years) and a positive FAST showed higher odds of early mortality (OR 5.2 and 5.8, respectively), although both associations had wide confidence intervals and two-sided Fisher p-values of 0.06. All seven patients who experienced cardiac arrest at the scene died within 24 hours. No transfusion-related adverse events were recorded; however, key physiological parameters such as ionized calcium and core temperature were not systematically monitored.
Conclusion: Prehospital erythrocyte transfusion was feasible within this aeromedical service and was associated with early improvement in shock index. Although no transfusion-related adverse events were recorded, incomplete physiological monitoring limits definitive conclusions regarding safety. These findings support the potential role of prehospital transfusion as a supportive measure in severe trauma, particularly in aeromedical settings.
{"title":"Prehospital erythrocyte transfusion: a clinical overview of aeromedical care in a Southern Brazilian macro-regional health system.","authors":"Paula Cella Giacometto, Miyoko Massago, Luiz Gustavo de Paulo, Mileni de Camargo Francisco, Mauricio Medeiros Lemos, Gerson Zanusso Junior, Edvaldo Vieira de Campos, Vlaudimir Dias Marques, Sanderland José Tavares Gurgel, Luciano de Andrade","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2026.113058","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2026.113058","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prehospital erythrocyte transfusion, well-established in the management of hemorrhagic shock in developed countries, was incorporated into trauma care in Brazil in 2022, representing a significant advance in the treatment of severe trauma. This study aimed to describe the clinical profile of patients with severe trauma who received prehospital erythrocyte transfusion by the SAMU aeromedical team in a health macro-region in Southern Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study (2022-2024) included patients with severe trauma treated by a regional SAMU aeromedical team who received prehospital erythrocyte transfusion at the trauma scene. Clinical, laboratory, and hemodynamic variables were collected, including prehospital and hospital shock index values. The primary outcome was 24-hour mortality. Associations with early mortality were explored using Fisher's exact test with exact odds ratios. Changes in shock index between prehospital and hospital moments were evaluated with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, while differences between survivors and non-survivors were assessed with the Mann-Whitney test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results: Thirty-eight patients were included, and 10 (26%) died within 24 hours. Prehospital erythrocyte transfusion was associated with a significant reduction in shock index, decreasing from a median of 1.85 (IQR 1.53-2.40) at the scene to 1.15 (IQR 0.90-1.68) on hospital arrival (p < 0.001), with no difference in the magnitude of reduction between survivors and non-survivors (p = 0.38). Non-survivors presented a more unfavorable metabolic profile on admission, with lower base excess and hematocrit and higher lactate levels. Older age (≥60 years) and a positive FAST showed higher odds of early mortality (OR 5.2 and 5.8, respectively), although both associations had wide confidence intervals and two-sided Fisher p-values of 0.06. All seven patients who experienced cardiac arrest at the scene died within 24 hours. No transfusion-related adverse events were recorded; however, key physiological parameters such as ionized calcium and core temperature were not systematically monitored.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prehospital erythrocyte transfusion was feasible within this aeromedical service and was associated with early improvement in shock index. Although no transfusion-related adverse events were recorded, incomplete physiological monitoring limits definitive conclusions regarding safety. These findings support the potential role of prehospital transfusion as a supportive measure in severe trauma, particularly in aeromedical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":" ","pages":"113058"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146047619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}