Journal of Crohn's & colitis最新文献

Background and aims: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) often report symptoms of anxiety and depression as well as impaired quality of life (QoL). To date, there are few studies on the effect of psychotherapy on psychological functioning and clinical outcome in patients with IBD. The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled study was to investigate the effect of a brief psychotherapeutic intervention on psychological distress, QoL, sexual functioning, and inflammation and disease activity indices in patients with IBD.

Methods: Participants were randomized to receive either group cognitive behavioral therapy or treatment as usual (controls) and were assessed at baseline and after six months using psychometric instruments to assess psychological distress, QoL, and sexual functioning. In addition, laboratory measurements, including levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), cytokines and calprotectin, and calculations of disease activity indices were performed during the two study periods.

Results: 80 participants took part in the study. Patients who received psychotherapy reported a significant decrease in anxiety and depression symptoms, a significant improvement in physical functioning, general health, vitality, social functioning and mental health, a decrease in physical pain and a decrease in role limitations caused by emotional problems. CRP levels and the Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) also decreased significantly at follow-up compared to controls.

Conclusions: Group cognitive behavioral therapy is proving to be an important component of holistic care for IBD patients, as it can significantly improve not only patients' psychosocial functioning but also their clinical course by inhibiting inflammation and reducing disease activity.

Background: Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). This post hoc analysis reports efficacy and safety by baseline corticosteroid use in the ELEVATE UC clinical programme.

Methods: Patients with UC received etrasimod 2 mg or placebo for up to 52 weeks. Corticosteroid use was permitted; tapering was recommended from Week 12. Efficacy was assessed at Weeks 12 and 52 in ELEVATE UC 52, and Week 12 in ELEVATE UC 12, in patients in the corticosteroid (CS) and no-CS subgroups. CS-free efficacy at Week 52 was assessed in patients with baseline CS use.

Results: In ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12, 93/289 (32.2%) and 65/238 (27.3%) patients receiving etrasimod and 42/144 (29.2%) and 34/116 (29.3%) patients receiving placebo, respectively, had concomitant CS use at baseline. In the CS and no-CS subgroups, higher proportions of patients who received etrasimod vs placebo achieved clinical remission (p < 0.05) in ELEVATE UC 52 at Weeks 12 (CS: 32.3% vs 16.7%; no-CS: 26.0% vs 4.9%) and 52 (CS: 31.2% vs 9.5%; no-CS: 33.2% vs 6.9%). In the CS subgroup, significantly more patients receiving etrasimod than placebo achieved CS-free clinical remission at Week 52 (31.2% vs 7.1%). No increases in infection rates were observed with baseline CS use. Safety was comparable between subgroups.

Conclusions: Etrasimod demonstrated efficacy in inducing and maintaining remission in both subgroups. CSfree remission was achieved in the CS subgroup. Safety was consistent, with no increase in infections.

Background and aims: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) trials often stratify patients by prior biologic exposure, including prior biologic failure or intolerance. This study aimed to assess clinical outcomes in IBD patients with prior biologic failure versus intolerance treated with ustekinumab or vedolizumab.

Methods: A post-hoc analysis of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) clinical trials for ustekinumab (UNITI, UNIFI) and vedolizumab (GEMINI-1, GEMINI-2) was performed. Clinical response, clinical remission, and endoscopic improvement (for UC) were compared among biologic naïve, biologic-failure, and biologic intolerant patients. Statistical analyses, including chi-square tests and logistic regression, were performed.

Results: 1178 UC and 1439 CD patients received either ustekinumab or vedolizumab. In UC, biologic intolerant patients exhibited higher clinical response (54.7% vs. 38.8%, aOR 1.87 [95% CI 0.93-3.73]), clinical remission (25.0% vs. 11.0%, aOR 2.84 [95% CI 1.47-5.49]), and endoscopic improvement (40.6% vs. 24.8%, aOR 2.76 [95% CI 1.28-5.94]) compared to biologic failure, with outcomes similar to biologic naïve patients. In biologic-intolerant CD patients, clinical response was similar between prior biologic failure and intolerance (34.2% vs 32.8%), but after adjustment for potential confounders, biologic intolerance was associated with higher odds of clinical response (aOR: 1.67, 95% CI 1.09-2.55), with no significant difference observed for clinical remission (aOR: 1.48, 95% CI 0.88-2.49).

Conclusion: Improved treatment outcomes were generally observed in patients with biologic intolerance compared to failure, especially in UC, where outcomes were similar to biologic naïve patients. Future clinical trials should meticulously differentiate prior biologic failure versus intolerance to mitigate potential bias.

Background and aims: Our objective was to compare the efficacy of novel biologics (like vedolizumab and ustekinumab), anti-tumour necrosis factor agents (anti-TNFs), and immunomodulators (IMMs) in preventing postoperative recurrence (POR) of Crohn's disease (CD).

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases up to December 2023 to identify placebo-controlled, no-treatment-comparison, or positive-controlled studies for the prevention of POR in CD. Endoscopic and clinical recurrence were the primary and secondary endpoint for the efficacy assessment. We conducted traditional direct and Bayesian network meta-analyses to evaluate the preventive effects of selected drugs. Additionally, we ranked interventions based on their scores under the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve (SUCRA).

Results: A total of 17 studies involving 2786 patients were included. In the direct meta-analysis, anti-TNFs, vedolizumab, and IMMs showed greater efficacy in preventing endoscopic POR, compared to controls (placebo or no treatment). When it came to preventing clinical POR, anti-TNFs and IMMs outperformed controls. The network meta-analysis revealed that the risk of endoscopic POR was considerably lower in patients receiving anti-TNFs, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab compared to controls. Regarding the reduction of clinical POR, only anti-TNFs showed significant efficacy compared to controls. Vedolizumab and anti-TNFs were ranked as the most effective strategies in preventing endoscopic and clinical recurrence, respectively.

Conclusions: According to direct and network meta-analysis, in CD patients after surgical resection, novel biologics, especially vedolizumab, were quite effective in decreasing the risk of endoscopic POR, whereas anti-TNFs appeared to perform best in reducing the risk of clinical POR.

Background and aims: Corticosteroids are widely used in managing inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. While adverse events [AEs] of corticosteroids are well recognised, current understanding of corticosteroid-related AE burden in IBD remains incomplete.

Methods: AE reports for prednisone/prednisolone and budesonide were extracted from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System [FAERS] and VigiBase databases. Total and frequently reported AEs were tabulated, and AEs of special interest were compared with reports for all drugs using proportional reporting ratio criteria. Database reports were compared with AEs reported in a patient survey capturing corticosteroid exposure and AE recall.

Results: In FAERS and VigiBase, 344,140 and 42,836 AEs were reported, respectively, in patients with IBD; among these, 10,157 [3.0%] and 11,391 [26.6%], respectively, were related to prednisone/prednisolone or budesonide. AEs associated with corticosteroid use in IBD increased over time. Adrenal insufficiency, Cushingoid complications, osteonecrosis, osteoporosis, diabetes and pancreatitis were disproportionately reported for corticosteroids. Among 9229 patients who responded to the survey, 6434 [69.7%] reported corticosteroid exposure. AEs were more frequently recalled by patients exposed to prednisone [61.9%] vs budesonide [27.4%; p = 0.0001]. The most commonly recalled AEs differed from those reported in the pharmacovigilance databases and included weight gain, sleep problems, mood disturbance and skin changes. Younger patients and those with mental health disorders were more likely to recall suicidal thoughts/attempts.

Conclusions: AEs associated with IBD-related corticosteroid use were frequent. Patients reported AEs affecting quality of life, while clinicians disproportionately reported AEs based on objective diagnostic criteria.

Background and aims: Microbiota transplant therapy is an emerging treatment for ulcerative colitis. One proposed mechanism for the benefit of microbiota transplant therapy is through engraftment of donor microbiota. However, the kinetics of engraftment are unknown. We identified SourceTracker as an efficient method both to determine engraftment and for the kinetic study of engrafting donor taxa to aid in determining the mechanism of how this therapy may treat ulcerative colitis.

Methods: Ulcerative colitis patients were treated with either encapsulated (drug name MTP-101C) or placebo capsules daily for eight weeks followed by a four-week washout period. Amplicon sequence data from donors and patients were analyzed using the Bayesian algorithm SourceTracker.

Results: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled, 14 to the placebo group and 13 to the microbiota transplant therapy group. Baseline Shannon and Chao1 indices negatively correlated with week 12 donor engraftment for patients treated with active drug capsules but not for placebo patients. SourceTracker engraftment positively correlated with the week 12 distance from donors measured using the Bray-Curtis similarity metric in treated patients but not with placebo. We identified engrafting taxa from donors in our patients as well as quantified the proportion of donor similarity or engraftment during weeks one through eight (active treatment) and week 12, four weeks after the last dose.

Conclusion: SourceTracker can be used as a simple and reliable method to quantify donor microbial community engraftment and donor taxa contribution in patients with ulcerative colitis and other inflammatory conditions treated with microbiota transplant therapy.

Background: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an experimental treatment for ulcerative colitis (UC). We aimed to study microbial families associated with FMT treatment success.

Methods: We analyzed stools from 24 UC patients treated with four FMTs weekly after randomization for pretreatment during three weeks with budesonide (n = 12) or placebo (n = 12). Stool samples were collected nine times pre-, during, and post FMT. Clinical and endoscopic response was assessed 14 weeks after initiation of the study using the full Mayo score. Early withdrawal due to worsening of UC symptoms was classified as non-response.

Results: Nine patients (38%) reached remission at week 14, and 15 patients had a partial response or non-response at or before week 14. With a Dirichlet Multinomial Mixture model we identified five distinct clusters based on the microbiota composition of 180 longitudinally collected patient samples and 27 donor samples. A Prevotellaceae-dominant cluster was associated with poor response to FMT treatment. Conversely, the families Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae were associated with a successful clinical response. These associations were already visible at the start of the treatment for a subgroup of patients and were retained in repeated measures analyses of family-specific abundance over time. Responders were also characterized by a significantly lower Simpson dominance compared to non-responders.

Conclusions: The success of FMT treatment of UC patients appears to be associated with specific gut microbiota families, such as control of Prevotellaceae. Monitoring the dynamics of these microbial families could potentially be used to inform treatment success early during FMT.

Background: The management of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients with concurrent liver transplantation is challenging, and data regarding the safety and efficacy of Janus kinase [JAK] inhibitors with anti-rejection medications are required. We report the experience of all liver transplant recipients receiving tofacitinib and/or upadacitinib for IBD across three states in Australia.

Methods: All liver transplant recipients from the Australian states of Victoria, New South Wales, and Tasmania, who required tofacitinib or upadacitinib for the treatment of IBD, were identified using prospectively maintained liver transplant databases. Patients were followed up until medication cessation or last follow-up. Clinical safety and efficacy data were collected.

Results: Eight patients [median age 30 years] were included, seven of whom received first-line JAK inhibition with tofacitinib. All patients had failed one or more biologic therapies prior to commencing JAK inhibition, including six patients who had failed two or more agents. JAK inhibition was continued for a median of 17 months, with 143 patient-months of combined follow-up. The anti-rejection medication tacrolimus was prescribed in all patients. Overall, seven [88%] patients achieved clinical remission, including all three patients who were switched from tofacitinib to upadacitinib. One patient required colectomy after 1 month of treatment. There were no other cases of serious infection, venous thromboembolism, or major adverse cardiovascular events during follow-up.

Conclusions: As the largest case series to date, these data indicate that combining JAK inhibition with transplant anti-rejection medication may be a safe and clinically effective method of treating IBD in patients with prior biologic failure.