Journal of Crohn's & colitis最新文献

Introduction: It is unclear if steroid tapering protocols can impact clinical trial outcomes in ulcerative colitis (UC), particularly fixed versus adaptive steroid tapering. Fixed steroid tapering involves incremental dose decreases at prespecified intervals and adaptive steroid tapering utilizes investigator discretion as determined by the patient's response.

Methods: In this post-hoc analysis from six clinical trials of UC (VARSITY, ACT 1, PURSUIT, GEMINI1, OCTAVE and ULTRA2), responders to induction therapy with baseline corticosteroid use were considered as the primary population of interest. Adjustments were made to account for treat-through versus re-randomization designs and multivariate regression was performed to account for other potential confounding variables. The primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CR) at one-year and secondary outcomes were CR and endoscopic improvement.

Results: There was a total of 861 patients who had achieved clinical response after induction and were using corticosteroids. Within multivariate analysis, patients using adaptive steroid tapering regimens were less likely to achieve corticosteroid-free CR at one year (odds ratio [OR] 0.66 [95% CI 0.48-0.92], p=0.015) but had increased odds for achieving CR at one year (OR 1.9 [95% CI 1.43-2.52], p<0.001). The steroid tapering regimen was not associated with achievement of endoscopic improvement at one year.

Conclusions: Among patients with UC on corticosteroids in clinical trials, patients using adaptive steroid weaning regimens were less likely to achieve corticosteroid-free CR at one year but more likely to achieve CR at one year. Consideration should be given to implementing mandatory fixed steroid weaning protocols in future clinical trials of UC.

Background and aims: We aimed to identify serum metabolites associated with mucosal and transmural inflammation in pediatric Crohn disease (pCD).

Methods: Fifty-six pCD patients were included through a pre-planned sub-study of the multicenter, prospective, ImageKids cohort, designed to develop the Pediatric Inflammatory Crohn's MRE Index (PICMI). Children were included throughout their disease course when undergoing ileocolonoscopy and magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and followed for 18 months when MRE was repeated. Serum metabolites were identified using liquid chromatography/mass spectroscopy. Outcomes included: PICMI, the simple endoscopic score (SES), faecal calprotectin (FCP), and C-reactive protein (CRP), to assess transmural, mucosal, and systemic inflammation, respectively. Random forest models were built by outcome. Maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) feature selection with a j-fold cross validation scheme identified the best subset of features and hyperparameter settings.

Results: Tryptophan and glutarylcarnitine were the top common mRMR metabolites linked to pCD inflammation. Random forest models established that amino acids and amines were among the most influential metabolites for predicting transmural and mucosal inflammation. Predictive models performed well, each with an area under the curve (AUC) > 70%. In addition, serum metabolites linked with pCD inflammation mainly related to perturbations in citrate cycle (TCA cycle), aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, tryptophan metabolism, butanoate metabolism, and tyrosine metabolism.

Conclusions: We extend on recent studies, observing differences in serum metabolite between healthy controls and Crohn disease patients, and suggest various associations of serum metabolites with transmural and mucosal inflammation. These metabolites could improve the understanding of pCD pathogenesis and assess disease severity.

Background and aims: Quality of life in patients with active Crohn's disease may be significantly reduced. We evaluated the effects of upadacitinib induction and maintenance therapy on fatigue, quality of life, and work productivity in the phase 3 trials U-EXCEL, U-EXCEED, and U-ENDURE.

Methods: Clinical responders to upadacitinib 45 mg in U-EXCEL and U-EXCEED induction trials were re-randomized 1:1:1 to upadacitinib 30 mg, 15 mg, or placebo for 52 weeks of maintenance in U-ENDURE. Clinically meaningful improvements in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) response, IBDQ remission, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment were evaluated. Percentages of patients achieving clinically meaningful improvements were assessed at induction Weeks 4 and 12 and maintenance Week 52.

Results: Analysis included 1021 and 502 patients assessed at induction and maintenance, respectively. In U-EXCEL, greater improvements (all p≤0.001) in IBDQ response (71.0% vs 50.2%), IBDQ remission (44.2% vs 23.7%), and FACIT-Fatigue (42.0% vs 27.0%) were observed in upadacitinib-treated patients versus placebo at Week 4. Improvements in IBDQ response, IBDQ remission, and FACIT-Fatigue were similar or greater at Week 12. Clinically meaningful improvement in overall work impairment (52.1% vs 38.1%, p≤0.05) was demonstrated at Week 12. Similar results were observed in U-EXCEED. Improvements were sustained through 52 weeks of upadacitinib maintenance treatment.

Conclusions: In patients with active Crohn's disease, upadacitinib treatment relative to placebo significantly improved fatigue, quality of life, and work productivity as early as Week 4. These effects were sustained through 52 weeks of maintenance.

Background and aims: The gut microbiota contributes to aberrant inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease, but the bacterial factors causing or exacerbating inflammation are not fully understood. Further, the predictive or prognostic value of gut microbial biomarkers for remission in response to biologic therapy is unclear.

Methods: We perform whole metagenomic sequencing of 550 stool samples from 287 ulcerative colitis patients from a large phase 3 head-to-head study of infliximab and etrolizumab.

Results: We identify several bacterial species in baseline and/or post-treatment samples that associate with clinical remission. These include previously described associations (Faecalibacterium prausnitzii_F) as well as new associations with remission to biologic therapy (Flavonifractor plautii). We build multivariate models and find that gut microbial species are better predictors for remission than clinical variables alone. Finally, we describe patient groups that differ in microbiome composition and remission rate after induction therapy, suggesting the potential utility of microbiome-based endotyping.

Conclusions: In this large study of ulcerative colitis patients, we show that few individual species associate strongly with clinical remission, but multivariate models including microbiome can predict clinical remission and have better predictive power compared to clinical data alone.

Background and aims: This study compares the effectiveness of different biologic therapies and sequences in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] using real-world data from a large cohort with long exposure.

Methods: Demographic, disease, treatment, and outcome data were retrieved for patients in the UK IBD BioResource. Effectiveness of treatment was based on persistence free of discontinuation or failure, analysed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust for differences between groups.

Results: In total, 13 222 evaluable patients received at least one biologic. In ulcerative colitis [UC] first-line vedolizumab [VDZ] demonstrated superior effectiveness over 5 years compared to anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] agents [p = 0.006]. VDZ was superior to both infliximab [IFX] and adalimumab [ADA] after ADA and IFX failure respectively [p < 0.001 and p < 0.001]. Anti-TNF therapy showed similar effectiveness when used as first-line treatment, or after failure of VDZ. In Crohn's disease [CD] we found significant differences between first-line treatments over 10 years [p = 0.045], with superior effectiveness of IFX compared to ADA in perianal CD. Non-anti-TNF biologics were superior to a second anti-TNF after first-line anti-TNF failure in CD [p = 0.035]. Patients with UC or CD experiencing TNF failure due to delayed loss of response or intolerance had superior outcomes when switching to a non-anti-TNF biologic, rather than a second anti-TNF.

Conclusions: We provide real-world evidence to guide biologic selection and sequencing in a range of common scenarios. Our findings challenge current guidelines regarding drug selection after loss of response to first anti-TNF treatment.

Background and aims: Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis [UC]. This post-hoc analysis of the phase 2 OASIS trial [NCT02447302] evaluated its efficacy for endoscopic improvement-histologic remission [EIHR] and assessed correlation between faecal calprotectin [FCP] and C-reactive protein [CRP] levels with efficacy outcomes.

Methods: In total, 156 adults with moderately to severely active UC received once-daily etrasimod (1 mg [n = 52]; 2 mg [n = 50]) or placebo [n = 54] for 12 weeks. Clinical, endoscopic, and histologic variables were evaluated at baseline and Week 12. EIHR was defined as achievement of endoscopic improvement [endoscopic subscore ≤ 1, without friability] and histologic remission [Geboes score < 2.0]. Outcomes included the relationships between FCP and CRP concentration and clinical, endoscopic, and histologic variables.

Results: Achievement of EIHR was significantly higher in patients who received etrasimod 2 mg versus placebo [19.5% vs 4.1%; Mantel-Haenszel estimated difference, 15.4%; p = 0.010]. In the etrasimod 2 mg group, median FCP and CRP levels at Week 12 were significantly lower in patients who achieved clinical remission, endoscopic improvement, histologic remission, and EIHR versus patients who did not [all p < 0.05]. An FCP concentration cutoff of 250 µg/g achieved optimum sensitivity and specificity for efficacy, including EIHR [0.857 and 0.786, respectively; κ coefficient, 0.3584]. Higher proportions of patients with FCP ≤ 250 µg/g achieved efficacy outcomes at Week 12 versus patients with FCP > 250 µg/g.

Conclusions: Etrasimod was effective for inducing EIHR in patients with UC. FCP and CRP may be useful, noninvasive biomarkers to monitor treatment response.

Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT02447302.

Background and aims: There is an unmet need in the treatment of perianal fistulising Crohn's disease [PFCD]. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the Janus kinase 1 preferential inhibitor, filgotinib, for the treatment of PFCD.

Methods: This phase 2, double-blind, multicentre trial enrolled adults with PFCD and prior treatment failure. Participants were randomised [2:2:1] to receive filgotinib 200 mg, filgotinib 100 mg, or placebo, once daily orally for up to 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was combined fistula response (reduction from baseline of at least one draining external opening determined by physical assessment, and no fluid collections >1 cm on pelvic magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) at Week 24.

Results: Between April 2017 and July 2020, 106 individuals were screened and 57 were randomised. Discontinuations were lowest in the filgotinib 200 mg group (3/17 [17.6%] versus 13/25 [52.0%] for filgotinib 100 mg and 9/15 [60.0%] for placebo). The proportion of participants who achieved a combined fistula response at Week 24 was 47.1% (8/17; 90% confidence interval [CI] 26.0, 68.9%) in the filgotinib 200 mg group, 29.2% [7/24; 90% CI 14.6, 47.9%] in the filgotinib 100 mg group, and 25.0% [3/12; 90% CI 7.2, 52.7%] in the placebo group. Serious adverse events occurred more frequently with filgotinib 200 mg (5/17 [29.4%]) than with placebo (1/15 [6.7%]). There were no treatment-related serious adverse events or deaths.

Conclusions: Filgotinib 200 mg was associated with numerical reductions in the number of draining perianal fistulas based on combined clinical and MRI findings compared with placebo, and was generally well tolerated [NCT03077412].

Backgrounds and aims: The Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) is the most popular endoscopic disease activity measure of ulcerative colitis (UC). Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy is expected to reduce diagnostic variability among endoscopists. However, no study has been conducted to ascertain whether AI-based MES assignments can help predict clinical relapse, nor has AI been verified to improve the diagnostic performance of non-specialists.

Methods: This open-label, prospective cohort study enrolled 110 patients with UC in clinical remission. The AI algorithm was developed using 74713 images from 898 patients who underwent colonoscopy at three centers. Patients were followed up after colonoscopy for 12 months, and clinical relapse was defined as a partial Mayo score >2. A multi-video, multi-reader analysis involving 124 videos was conducted to determine whether the AI system reduced the diagnostic variability among six non-specialists.

Results: The clinical relapse rate for patients with AI-based MES = 1 (24.5% [12/49]) was significantly higher (log-rank test, P = 0.01) than that for patients with AI-based MES = 0 (3.2% [1/31]). Relapse occurred during the 12-month follow-up period in 16.2% (13/80) of patients with AI-based MES = 0 or 1 and 50.0% (10/20) of those with AI-based MES = 2 or 3 (log-rank test, P = 0.03). Using AI resulted in better inter- and intra-observer reproducibility than endoscopists alone.

Conclusions: Colonoscopy using the AI-based MES system can stratify the risk of clinical relapse in patients with UC and improve the diagnostic performance of non-specialists.