首页 > 最新文献

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS最新文献

英文 中文
Commentary on "Exploring the use, outcomes, barriers, and facilitators of prehabilitation and rehabilitation in abdominoplasty surgeries: A scoping review". 关于 "探索腹部整形手术前康复和康复的使用、结果、障碍和促进因素:范围界定综述 "的评论。
Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.026
Jing Qin Tay
{"title":"Commentary on \"Exploring the use, outcomes, barriers, and facilitators of prehabilitation and rehabilitation in abdominoplasty surgeries: A scoping review\".","authors":"Jing Qin Tay","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.026","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.026","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":" ","pages":"628"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142304914","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quality of plastic surgery Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) studies: A systematic review. 整形手术质量提高术后恢复(ERAS)研究:系统综述。
Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.063
Kathryn Uhlman, Tara Behroozian, Natalia Lewandowski, Morgan Yuan, Patrick Kim, Alexandra Hatchell, Sophocles Voineskos, Claire Temple-Oberle, Achilles Thoma

Background: In effort to improve post-operative outcomes, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have gained popularity. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the reporting and methodological quality of plastic surgery ERAS studies.

Methods: All plastic surgery ERAS implementation studies, published between January 1, 2020, to November 20, 2023, were included. The primary outcome was reporting quality based on "The Reporting on ERAS Compliance, Outcomes, and Elements Research (RECOvER) checklist" (40 points). Secondary outcomes included methodology quality as per ERAS® Society endorsed guidelines (Breast 18 points; Head and Neck (H&N) 24 points).

Results: Fifty ERAS studies were included (breast reconstruction: 29, 58%; head and neck: 7, 14%; craniofacial: 6, 12%; aesthetic: 5, 10%; other: 3, 6%). Average reporting quality was 22.6/40 (56.7%). ERAS protocol elements least adhered to included: patient warming strategy (8/50, 16%), management of post-operative fluids (14/50, 28%), and post-discharge outcome tracking (14/50, 28%). Evaluation of breast methodological quality revealed average compliance of 9.2/18 (51.3%). The least complied with elements included preoperative computed tomography angiography (4/23, 17.4%), intraoperative warming (6/23, 26.1%), and post-operative wound management (2/23, 8.7%). For head and neck studies, average compliance was 9.1/23 (39.6%). The least complied with elements included pre-anesthesia pain medications (1/7, 14.3%), post-operative wound care (0/7, 0%), and urinary catheterization removal (1/7, 14.3%).

Conclusions: ERAS implementation studies in plastic surgery are highly variable, with overall low reporting and methodology quality. Plastic surgeons should be cautious when adopting published ERAS protocols that do not adhere to the recommended and official ERAS® Society guidelines.

背景:为了改善术后预后,手术后增强恢复(ERAS)方案越来越受欢迎。本系统综述的目的是评估整形外科ERAS研究的报告和方法学质量。方法:纳入2020年1月1日至2023年11月20日期间发表的所有整形外科ERAS实施研究。主要结果是基于“ERAS依从性报告、结果和要素研究(恢复)清单”的报告质量(40分)。次要结局包括ERAS®协会认可指南的方法学质量(Breast 18分;头颈部(H&N) 24分。结果:纳入50例ERAS研究(乳房重建:29.58%;头颈部:7.14%;颅面:6.12%;美学:5.10%;其他:3.6%)。平均报告质量为22.6/40(56.7%)。ERAS方案中最少遵守的要素包括:患者升温策略(8/50,16%)、术后液体管理(14/50,28%)和出院后结果跟踪(14/50,28%)。乳房方法学质量评估显示,平均依从性为9.2/18(51.3%)。术前计算机断层血管造影(4/23,17.4%)、术中温暖(6/23,26.1%)和术后伤口处理(2/23,8.7%)符合程度最低。头颈部研究的平均依从性为9.1/23(39.6%)。遵守程度最低的因素包括麻醉前止痛药(1/7,14.3%)、术后伤口护理(0/7,0%)和拔除导尿(1/7,14.3%)。结论:整形外科ERAS实施的研究变化很大,总体上报告质量和方法质量都很低。整形外科医生在采用出版的ERAS协议时应该谨慎,因为这些协议不符合推荐的和官方的ERAS®协会指南。
{"title":"Quality of plastic surgery Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) studies: A systematic review.","authors":"Kathryn Uhlman, Tara Behroozian, Natalia Lewandowski, Morgan Yuan, Patrick Kim, Alexandra Hatchell, Sophocles Voineskos, Claire Temple-Oberle, Achilles Thoma","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.063","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.063","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In effort to improve post-operative outcomes, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have gained popularity. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the reporting and methodological quality of plastic surgery ERAS studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All plastic surgery ERAS implementation studies, published between January 1, 2020, to November 20, 2023, were included. The primary outcome was reporting quality based on \"The Reporting on ERAS Compliance, Outcomes, and Elements Research (RECOvER) checklist\" (40 points). Secondary outcomes included methodology quality as per ERAS® Society endorsed guidelines (Breast 18 points; Head and Neck (H&N) 24 points).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty ERAS studies were included (breast reconstruction: 29, 58%; head and neck: 7, 14%; craniofacial: 6, 12%; aesthetic: 5, 10%; other: 3, 6%). Average reporting quality was 22.6/40 (56.7%). ERAS protocol elements least adhered to included: patient warming strategy (8/50, 16%), management of post-operative fluids (14/50, 28%), and post-discharge outcome tracking (14/50, 28%). Evaluation of breast methodological quality revealed average compliance of 9.2/18 (51.3%). The least complied with elements included preoperative computed tomography angiography (4/23, 17.4%), intraoperative warming (6/23, 26.1%), and post-operative wound management (2/23, 8.7%). For head and neck studies, average compliance was 9.1/23 (39.6%). The least complied with elements included pre-anesthesia pain medications (1/7, 14.3%), post-operative wound care (0/7, 0%), and urinary catheterization removal (1/7, 14.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ERAS implementation studies in plastic surgery are highly variable, with overall low reporting and methodology quality. Plastic surgeons should be cautious when adopting published ERAS protocols that do not adhere to the recommended and official ERAS® Society guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":"101 ","pages":"106-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142901324","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of DIEP and PAP free flaps for breast reconstruction in the context of breast cancer: A retrospective study of 677 patients over 10 years. DIEP和PAP游离皮瓣用于乳腺癌乳房重建的比较:一项超过10年的677例患者的回顾性研究。
Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.040
Laura M Charlès, Yohann Dabi, Thibaud Mernier, Alexandre G Lellouch, Laurent Lantieri

Background: Profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap following cancer surgery has emerged as a relevant alternative for breast reconstruction but is mainly used in cases where the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap cannot be performed. The aim of this study was to compare the PAP and DIEP flaps' surgical and aesthetics outcomes in breast reconstruction.

Methods: Women who underwent breast reconstruction by DIEP or PAP flap at the Plastic Surgery Department of Georges Pompidou European University Hospital, Paris, France, between January 2012 and December 2020 were included. Patient's demographic characteristics, type, laterality, and timing of reconstruction were recorded. Operative times, length of hospital stay, general complications, and surgical complications were compared. The number of late surgical reoperations, their timing relative to the initial reconstructive procedure, and their purpose were also compared.

Results: A total of 677 patients were included, 559 of whom received DIEP flaps and 118 received PAP flaps. PAP flap patients were significantly younger, thinner, and had a smaller initial bra cup size than those who received DIEP (p < 0.001) Operative time was similar for both groups (p = 0.074). There was no difference in the number of early post-operative reoperations (p > 0.554) or late revisions (p > 0.403) between DIEP or PAP.

Conclusion: Provided that the technical and human resources are available, PAP flap is a valid technique, without increased risk of surgical complications and reoperations, or lengthening of operative time. The PAP flap should be considered a primary therapeutic option and not as an alternative to the DIEP flap.

背景:肿瘤手术后的深动脉穿支(PAP)皮瓣已成为乳房重建的一种相关选择,但主要用于不能进行上腹部深下穿支(DIEP)皮瓣的病例。本研究的目的是比较PAP和DIEP皮瓣在乳房重建中的手术和美学效果。方法:纳入2012年1月至2020年12月在法国巴黎蓬皮杜欧洲大学医院整形外科行DIEP或PAP皮瓣乳房重建术的女性。记录患者的人口学特征、类型、侧位和重建时间。比较手术时间、住院时间、一般并发症和手术并发症。我们还比较了晚期再手术的次数、相对于初始重建手术的时间以及手术的目的。结果:共纳入677例患者,其中559例行DIEP皮瓣,118例行PAP皮瓣。PAP皮瓣患者比DIEP患者更年轻、更瘦、初始罩杯尺寸更小(p < 0.001),两组手术时间相似(p = 0.074)。在DIEP和PAP之间,术后早期再手术次数(p > 0.554)和后期翻修次数(p > 0.403)没有差异。结论:在技术和人力条件允许的情况下,PAP皮瓣是一种有效的技术,不会增加手术并发症和再手术的风险,也不会延长手术时间。PAP瓣应被视为主要的治疗选择,而不是作为DIEP瓣的替代。
{"title":"Comparison of DIEP and PAP free flaps for breast reconstruction in the context of breast cancer: A retrospective study of 677 patients over 10 years.","authors":"Laura M Charlès, Yohann Dabi, Thibaud Mernier, Alexandre G Lellouch, Laurent Lantieri","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap following cancer surgery has emerged as a relevant alternative for breast reconstruction but is mainly used in cases where the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap cannot be performed. The aim of this study was to compare the PAP and DIEP flaps' surgical and aesthetics outcomes in breast reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women who underwent breast reconstruction by DIEP or PAP flap at the Plastic Surgery Department of Georges Pompidou European University Hospital, Paris, France, between January 2012 and December 2020 were included. Patient's demographic characteristics, type, laterality, and timing of reconstruction were recorded. Operative times, length of hospital stay, general complications, and surgical complications were compared. The number of late surgical reoperations, their timing relative to the initial reconstructive procedure, and their purpose were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 677 patients were included, 559 of whom received DIEP flaps and 118 received PAP flaps. PAP flap patients were significantly younger, thinner, and had a smaller initial bra cup size than those who received DIEP (p < 0.001) Operative time was similar for both groups (p = 0.074). There was no difference in the number of early post-operative reoperations (p > 0.554) or late revisions (p > 0.403) between DIEP or PAP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Provided that the technical and human resources are available, PAP flap is a valid technique, without increased risk of surgical complications and reoperations, or lengthening of operative time. The PAP flap should be considered a primary therapeutic option and not as an alternative to the DIEP flap.</p>","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":"101 ","pages":"141-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142911355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Timing of sentinel lymph node biopsy and lymphoscintigraphy before surgery for melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 黑素瘤术前前哨淋巴结活检和淋巴显影的时机:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.062
Zhen Yu Wong, Pegah Damavandi, Adam Tamas Misky, Jonathan Pollock

Introduction: The management of malignant melanomas often involves performing a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) aided by imaging with lymphoscintigraphy. Whether lymphoscintigraphy should be performed on the same day as the SLNB operation (SD) or the day before (DB) surgery remains debated. This study aims to summarise existing evidence regarding the impact of the relative timings of lymphoscintigraphy and SLNB on clinical outcomes in melanoma.

Methods: A PRISMA-compliant search was conducted from inception to 28th May 2024. Data were collected on SLNB in melanoma patients who underwent either an SD or DB approach. The following outcomes were extracted from the articles: node identification, recurrence rate and survival outcomes. Pooled effects of outcomes were estimated using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model/generalised linear mixed model, where applicable.

Results: A total of 9 studies met the inclusion criteria. Six studies (n = 10, 216) compared SD and DB approach outcomes, while 3 studies (n = 153) compared SD and DB SLNB within the same patient cohort. In the former, no significant difference was found in positivity rates between SD and DB groups (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.94-1.13, p = 0.475), and recurrence rates were comparable (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.75-1.07, p = 0.233). SD approach was associated with significantly shorter hospital stays and lower costs, but conflicting results were observed in survival outcomes. In the latter studies, all 3 reported discrepancies between the results of the SD and DB approaches.

Conclusion: Current evidence is insufficient to provide a definitive answer. Further research is warranted to conclusively evaluate the impact of SLNB timing on melanoma outcomes and patient care.

简介:恶性黑色素瘤的治疗通常包括在淋巴显像辅助下进行前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)。淋巴显像是否应该在SLNB手术当天(SD)或手术前一天(DB)进行仍有争议。本研究旨在总结有关淋巴显像和SLNB相对时间对黑色素瘤临床结果影响的现有证据。方法:从开始到2024年5月28日进行符合prisma标准的检索。我们收集了接受SD或DB入路的黑色素瘤患者SLNB的数据。以下结果从文章中提取:淋巴结识别,复发率和生存结果。在适用的情况下,使用DerSimonian和Laird随机效应模型/广义线性混合模型估计结果的合并效应。结果:共有9项研究符合纳入标准。6项研究(n = 10,216)比较了SD和DB方法的结果,而3项研究(n = 153)在同一患者队列中比较了SD和DB SLNB。在前者中,SD组和DB组的阳性率无显著性差异(RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.94 ~ 1.13, p = 0.475),复发率具有可比性(RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.75 ~ 1.07, p = 0.233)。SD方法与显著缩短住院时间和降低费用相关,但在生存结果中观察到相互矛盾的结果。在后一项研究中,所有3项研究都报告了SD和DB方法结果之间的差异。结论:目前的证据不足以提供一个明确的答案。需要进一步的研究来最终评估SLNB时间对黑色素瘤预后和患者护理的影响。
{"title":"Timing of sentinel lymph node biopsy and lymphoscintigraphy before surgery for melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Zhen Yu Wong, Pegah Damavandi, Adam Tamas Misky, Jonathan Pollock","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.062","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.062","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The management of malignant melanomas often involves performing a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) aided by imaging with lymphoscintigraphy. Whether lymphoscintigraphy should be performed on the same day as the SLNB operation (SD) or the day before (DB) surgery remains debated. This study aims to summarise existing evidence regarding the impact of the relative timings of lymphoscintigraphy and SLNB on clinical outcomes in melanoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PRISMA-compliant search was conducted from inception to 28th May 2024. Data were collected on SLNB in melanoma patients who underwent either an SD or DB approach. The following outcomes were extracted from the articles: node identification, recurrence rate and survival outcomes. Pooled effects of outcomes were estimated using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model/generalised linear mixed model, where applicable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9 studies met the inclusion criteria. Six studies (n = 10, 216) compared SD and DB approach outcomes, while 3 studies (n = 153) compared SD and DB SLNB within the same patient cohort. In the former, no significant difference was found in positivity rates between SD and DB groups (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.94-1.13, p = 0.475), and recurrence rates were comparable (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.75-1.07, p = 0.233). SD approach was associated with significantly shorter hospital stays and lower costs, but conflicting results were observed in survival outcomes. In the latter studies, all 3 reported discrepancies between the results of the SD and DB approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current evidence is insufficient to provide a definitive answer. Further research is warranted to conclusively evaluate the impact of SLNB timing on melanoma outcomes and patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":"101 ","pages":"196-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142985869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Jejunal artery and vein positioning in free jejunal transfer: Surgical considerations and clinical implications. 游离空肠转移中空肠动静脉定位:手术考虑及临床意义。
Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.058
Akatsuki Kondo, Takuya Higashino, Kazuki Shimada, Kohei Hashimoto, Yutaka Fukunaga, Azusa Oshima, Rei Ogawa

Background: Previous computed tomography studies have reported that the superior mesenteric artery is often located ventrally to the superior mesenteric vein; however, the precise location of the peripheral jejunal arteriovenous system is unknown. This study investigated the arteriovenous positioning of the free jejunal flaps during reconstructive surgery.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 78 patients who underwent free jejunal flap reconstruction between June 2021 and May 2023. The positions of the jejunal artery and vein were classified into 6 patterns (A-F) based on the photographs taken during the flap harvest. Statistical analysis was performed to examine the location of the artery (ventral vs. dorsal) and its orientation along the oral-anal axis in relation to the vein.

Results: The jejunal arteries were most commonly located on the oral and ventral sides of the vein (type A, 48.6%) when the mesentery of the jejunal flap is positioned toward the front, with the left and right sides corresponding to the oral and anorectal sides, respectively. Notably, 62.1% of the arteries were located on the oral side and 71.6% on the ventral side. The recipient arteries used for vascular anastomosis were predominantly the superior thyroid artery (44.6%) and transverse cervical artery (50.0%), while the internal jugular vein (85.1%) was the most commonly used vein.

Conclusion: The position of the jejunal arteriovenous system is important for optimizing anastomotic techniques and ensuring safe surgical outcomes. Understanding vascular anatomy patterns can help prevent vessel misplacement and allow for more reliable and accurate anastomosis procedures.

背景:先前的计算机断层研究报道,肠系膜上动脉通常位于肠系膜上静脉的腹侧;然而,周围空肠动静脉系统的精确位置尚不清楚。本研究探讨游离空肠皮瓣重建手术时的动静脉定位。方法:本回顾性队列研究包括78例于2021年6月至2023年5月期间接受游离空肠皮瓣重建的患者。根据皮瓣采集时所拍摄的照片,将空肠动静脉的位置划分为6种模式(A-F)。进行统计分析以检查动脉的位置(腹侧与背侧)及其沿口肛轴相对于静脉的方向。结果:当空肠瓣肠系膜朝前放置时,空肠动脉最常见于静脉的口侧和腹侧(A型,48.6%),左右侧分别对应口侧和肛肠侧。值得注意的是,62.1%的动脉位于口腔一侧,71.6%位于腹侧。用于血管吻合的受体动脉以甲状腺上动脉(44.6%)和颈横动脉(50.0%)为主,颈内静脉(85.1%)是最常用的静脉。结论:空肠动静脉系统的位置对优化吻合技术和保证手术安全效果具有重要意义。了解血管解剖模式可以帮助防止血管错位,并允许更可靠和准确的吻合程序。
{"title":"Jejunal artery and vein positioning in free jejunal transfer: Surgical considerations and clinical implications.","authors":"Akatsuki Kondo, Takuya Higashino, Kazuki Shimada, Kohei Hashimoto, Yutaka Fukunaga, Azusa Oshima, Rei Ogawa","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.058","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.058","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous computed tomography studies have reported that the superior mesenteric artery is often located ventrally to the superior mesenteric vein; however, the precise location of the peripheral jejunal arteriovenous system is unknown. This study investigated the arteriovenous positioning of the free jejunal flaps during reconstructive surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 78 patients who underwent free jejunal flap reconstruction between June 2021 and May 2023. The positions of the jejunal artery and vein were classified into 6 patterns (A-F) based on the photographs taken during the flap harvest. Statistical analysis was performed to examine the location of the artery (ventral vs. dorsal) and its orientation along the oral-anal axis in relation to the vein.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The jejunal arteries were most commonly located on the oral and ventral sides of the vein (type A, 48.6%) when the mesentery of the jejunal flap is positioned toward the front, with the left and right sides corresponding to the oral and anorectal sides, respectively. Notably, 62.1% of the arteries were located on the oral side and 71.6% on the ventral side. The recipient arteries used for vascular anastomosis were predominantly the superior thyroid artery (44.6%) and transverse cervical artery (50.0%), while the internal jugular vein (85.1%) was the most commonly used vein.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The position of the jejunal arteriovenous system is important for optimizing anastomotic techniques and ensuring safe surgical outcomes. Understanding vascular anatomy patterns can help prevent vessel misplacement and allow for more reliable and accurate anastomosis procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":"101 ","pages":"84-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142879158","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reoperative hybrid breast augmentation: An analysis of risk factors for complications and reoperations. 再手术混合型隆胸:并发症及再手术的危险因素分析。
Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.055
Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz, Ary de Azevedo Marques Neto

Background: Autogenous fat grafting (AFG) has become a common procedure to optimize aesthetic results in breast augmentation (BA). However, complications or outcomes in reoperative BA remain unclear. This study compared the outcomes or risk factors in reoperative BA with AFG and without AFG.

Objectives: To assess outcomes from AFG in a large series of patients undergoing reoperative BA.

Methods: We identified a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent secondary BA, and then established 2 groups that did and did not receive AFG. Charts were reviewed for complications or reoperations. The primary outcome was complications (identified clinically or via imaging), and regression logistic analysis was used to evaluate risk factors including age, body mass index, smoking, implant surface/volume, and previous pocket.

Results: Overall, 293 patients were included (age: 41 ±9.4 years, follow-up: 70.4±30.7 months). In the AFG group (n = 111), 27.9% had at least 1 complication, most frequently capsular contracture; 12% had a previous submuscular pocket (43% presented animation deformities). In the non-AFG group (n = 182), 29.6% had at least 1 complication. No significant difference was observed between groups for total complications (p = 0.750) or reoperation (p = 0.665). AFG itself was independently associated with increased risk of altered imaging results (p = 0.002; OR = 2.92), predominantly oil cysts. In the AFG group, animation was completely resolved.

Conclusions: Despite extensive AFG research, previous reoperative BA studies are limited and have not analyzed complications or long-term outcomes. AFG provides adequate tissue thickness to allow for a more superficial pocket, thus resolving animation issues. Our results indicate that AFG is a reliable technique that permits satisfactory outcomes and does not increase overall complication or reoperation rates compared to the procedures without AFG.

背景:自体脂肪移植术(AFG)已成为优化隆胸(BA)美容效果的常用方法。然而,再手术BA的并发症或结果尚不清楚。本研究比较了再手术BA伴AFG和不伴AFG的预后或危险因素。目的:评估AFG在大系列再手术BA患者中的效果。方法:我们确定了一组接受继发性BA的患者,然后建立了接受和未接受AFG的两组。检查并发症或再手术的图表。主要结局是并发症(临床或影像学诊断),并使用回归逻辑分析评估危险因素,包括年龄、体重指数、吸烟、种植体表面/体积和既往口袋。结果:共纳入293例患者(年龄41±9.4岁,随访70.4±30.7个月)。在AFG组(n = 111)中,27.9%至少有1种并发症,最常见的是包膜挛缩;12%以前有肌肉下袋(43%表现为动画畸形)。在非afg组(n = 182)中,29.6%至少有1种并发症。两组总并发症数(p = 0.750)和再手术数(p = 0.665)差异无统计学意义。AFG本身与影像学结果改变的风险增加独立相关(p = 0.002;OR = 2.92),主要是油囊肿。在AFG组,动画完全消失。结论:尽管有广泛的AFG研究,但先前的再手术BA研究有限,没有分析并发症或长期结果。AFG提供了足够的组织厚度,允许更浅的口袋,从而解决动画问题。我们的结果表明,与没有AFG的手术相比,AFG是一种可靠的技术,可以获得满意的结果,并且不会增加总体并发症或再手术率。
{"title":"Reoperative hybrid breast augmentation: An analysis of risk factors for complications and reoperations.","authors":"Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz, Ary de Azevedo Marques Neto","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.055","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.055","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Autogenous fat grafting (AFG) has become a common procedure to optimize aesthetic results in breast augmentation (BA). However, complications or outcomes in reoperative BA remain unclear. This study compared the outcomes or risk factors in reoperative BA with AFG and without AFG.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess outcomes from AFG in a large series of patients undergoing reoperative BA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent secondary BA, and then established 2 groups that did and did not receive AFG. Charts were reviewed for complications or reoperations. The primary outcome was complications (identified clinically or via imaging), and regression logistic analysis was used to evaluate risk factors including age, body mass index, smoking, implant surface/volume, and previous pocket.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 293 patients were included (age: 41 ±9.4 years, follow-up: 70.4±30.7 months). In the AFG group (n = 111), 27.9% had at least 1 complication, most frequently capsular contracture; 12% had a previous submuscular pocket (43% presented animation deformities). In the non-AFG group (n = 182), 29.6% had at least 1 complication. No significant difference was observed between groups for total complications (p = 0.750) or reoperation (p = 0.665). AFG itself was independently associated with increased risk of altered imaging results (p = 0.002; OR = 2.92), predominantly oil cysts. In the AFG group, animation was completely resolved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite extensive AFG research, previous reoperative BA studies are limited and have not analyzed complications or long-term outcomes. AFG provides adequate tissue thickness to allow for a more superficial pocket, thus resolving animation issues. Our results indicate that AFG is a reliable technique that permits satisfactory outcomes and does not increase overall complication or reoperation rates compared to the procedures without AFG.</p>","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":"101 ","pages":"53-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142873738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advanced reconstructive techniques following orbital exenteration: The role of LCFA free flaps. 眶内剜除后的先进重建技术:LCFA游离皮瓣的作用。
Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.030
Mario Cherubino, Mario Turri-Zanoni, Michele Maruccia, Pietro di Summa, Silvia Cozzi, Ferruccio Paganini, Leonardo Garutti, Paolo Battaglia

Background: Orbital exenteration is a severe and disabling surgical procedure that involves the removal of all orbital contents. Effective reconstruction is crucial to managing the resulting defects. This study aims to propose a reconstructive algorithm utilizing free flaps derived from the lateral circumflex femoral artery (LCFA) system for orbital exenteration defects, based on our clinical experience.

Patients and methods: Patients who underwent orbital exenteration and subsequent reconstruction using LCFA-based free flaps between January 2013 and January 2022 were included in this study.

Results: A total of 44 patients underwent orbital exenteration, followed by LCFA free flap reconstruction. The choice of reconstructive technique depended on defect type and dura mater exposure, adhering to the proposed algorithm. The procedures included 20 standard ALT (Anterolateral thigh) flaps, 13 chimeric ALT flaps, 1 SALT chimeric flap with skin grafting, 7 SALT flaps with skin grafting, and 3 buried SALT flaps. Complications were recorded in 10 cases at the recipient site and 2 cases at the donor site.

Conclusion: Orbital exenteration presents significant challenges both surgically and reconstructively, with a high risk of local recurrence and postoperative mortality. The reconstruction algorithm using LCFA-based free flaps, as proposed in this study, may guide surgeons in selecting the most appropriate technique, tailored to the specific defect and considering postoperative treatments such as adjuvant radiotherapy.

背景:眶内清除术是一种严重且致残性的手术,包括移除所有眶内内容物。有效的重建对于管理产生的缺陷是至关重要的。本研究的目的是根据我们的临床经验,提出一种利用来自旋股外侧动脉(LCFA)系统的自由皮瓣修复眶内缺损的重建算法。患者和方法:本研究纳入了2013年1月至2022年1月期间使用基于lcfa的游离皮瓣进行眶内清除和随后重建的患者。结果:44例患者行眶内清除术,术后行LCFA游离皮瓣重建。重建技术的选择取决于缺陷类型和硬脑膜暴露,坚持所提出的算法。手术包括标准ALT(大腿前外侧)皮瓣20个,ALT嵌合皮瓣13个,SALT嵌合皮瓣植皮1个,SALT植皮7个,埋地SALT皮瓣3个。受者10例,供者2例。结论:眼窝摘除在手术和重建方面都面临着巨大的挑战,具有很高的局部复发和术后死亡率。本研究提出的基于lcfa的自由皮瓣重建算法,可以指导外科医生根据具体缺陷选择最合适的技术,并考虑术后治疗,如辅助放疗。
{"title":"Advanced reconstructive techniques following orbital exenteration: The role of LCFA free flaps.","authors":"Mario Cherubino, Mario Turri-Zanoni, Michele Maruccia, Pietro di Summa, Silvia Cozzi, Ferruccio Paganini, Leonardo Garutti, Paolo Battaglia","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.030","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.030","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orbital exenteration is a severe and disabling surgical procedure that involves the removal of all orbital contents. Effective reconstruction is crucial to managing the resulting defects. This study aims to propose a reconstructive algorithm utilizing free flaps derived from the lateral circumflex femoral artery (LCFA) system for orbital exenteration defects, based on our clinical experience.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients who underwent orbital exenteration and subsequent reconstruction using LCFA-based free flaps between January 2013 and January 2022 were included in this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 44 patients underwent orbital exenteration, followed by LCFA free flap reconstruction. The choice of reconstructive technique depended on defect type and dura mater exposure, adhering to the proposed algorithm. The procedures included 20 standard ALT (Anterolateral thigh) flaps, 13 chimeric ALT flaps, 1 SALT chimeric flap with skin grafting, 7 SALT flaps with skin grafting, and 3 buried SALT flaps. Complications were recorded in 10 cases at the recipient site and 2 cases at the donor site.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Orbital exenteration presents significant challenges both surgically and reconstructively, with a high risk of local recurrence and postoperative mortality. The reconstruction algorithm using LCFA-based free flaps, as proposed in this study, may guide surgeons in selecting the most appropriate technique, tailored to the specific defect and considering postoperative treatments such as adjuvant radiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":"101 ","pages":"23-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142873708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Buried-guided suture suspension of the alar crus: A minimally invasive method to correct nostril exposure. 埋置引导鼻翼脚悬吊缝合:一种微创矫正鼻孔外露的方法。
Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.056
Qiang Yue, Zilong Cao, Yunzhang Wang, Shu Rui, Jiayue Liu, Tiran Zhang, Liqiang Liu

Objectives: To introduce a novel technique using the buried-guided suture method for suspending the alar crus to correct nostril exposure in East Asians and to investigate its safety and efficacy.

Methods: Patients with ptotic alar crus and nostril exposure at our clinic were enrolled between December 2011 and December 2023. Via an intranasal incision, the excess skin on the inner side of the nostrils was excised. The alar crus was suspended to the periosteum of the piriform aperture using non-absorbable sutures. Changes in the exposed area of the nostrils and distance of alar crus elevation were statistically analyzed before and after surgery. Satisfaction rate was assessed using a four-point visual analog scale.

Results: A total of 35 patients were included, with an average follow-up duration of 15 ± 6 months. Post-operatively, the mean exposed area of the nostrils was significantly reduced compared to the preoperative area (9.14 ± 1.93 mm² vs. 20.97 ± 2.64 mm², P < 0.05). The mean height of the alar crus relative to the base of the columella showed significant improvement post-operatively (+1.08 ± 0.32 mm vs. -1.82 ± 0.32 mm, P < 0.05). Overall, 91.4% (32/35) patients expressed satisfaction with the outcomes.

Conclusions: The buried-guided suture method for suspending the alar crus combined with excision of the inner nasal skin is a safe and effective surgical procedure for correcting nostril exposure.

目的:介绍一种新的埋置引导下鼻翼脚悬吊缝合术治疗东亚人鼻孔暴露的方法,并探讨其安全性和有效性。方法:选取2011年12月至2023年12月在我院就诊的鼻翼、脚、鼻孔外露上睑下垂患者。通过鼻内切口,切除鼻孔内侧多余的皮肤。用不可吸收缝线将鼻翼脚悬吊在梨状孔的骨膜上。统计分析手术前后鼻孔暴露面积和鼻翼脚抬高距离的变化。满意度采用四分式视觉模拟量表进行评估。结果:共纳入35例患者,平均随访时间15±6个月。术后鼻孔平均暴露面积较术前明显减少(9.14±1.93 mm²比20.97±2.64 mm²,P < 0.05)。鼻翼脚相对于鼻梁基部的平均高度术后有显著改善(+1.08±0.32 mm vs -1.82±0.32 mm, P < 0.05)。总体而言,91.4%(32/35)的患者对结果表示满意。结论:埋置引导下鼻翼足悬吊缝合联合鼻内皮切除是一种安全有效的矫正鼻孔外露的手术方法。
{"title":"Buried-guided suture suspension of the alar crus: A minimally invasive method to correct nostril exposure.","authors":"Qiang Yue, Zilong Cao, Yunzhang Wang, Shu Rui, Jiayue Liu, Tiran Zhang, Liqiang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.056","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.056","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To introduce a novel technique using the buried-guided suture method for suspending the alar crus to correct nostril exposure in East Asians and to investigate its safety and efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with ptotic alar crus and nostril exposure at our clinic were enrolled between December 2011 and December 2023. Via an intranasal incision, the excess skin on the inner side of the nostrils was excised. The alar crus was suspended to the periosteum of the piriform aperture using non-absorbable sutures. Changes in the exposed area of the nostrils and distance of alar crus elevation were statistically analyzed before and after surgery. Satisfaction rate was assessed using a four-point visual analog scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 35 patients were included, with an average follow-up duration of 15 ± 6 months. Post-operatively, the mean exposed area of the nostrils was significantly reduced compared to the preoperative area (9.14 ± 1.93 mm² vs. 20.97 ± 2.64 mm², P < 0.05). The mean height of the alar crus relative to the base of the columella showed significant improvement post-operatively (+1.08 ± 0.32 mm vs. -1.82 ± 0.32 mm, P < 0.05). Overall, 91.4% (32/35) patients expressed satisfaction with the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The buried-guided suture method for suspending the alar crus combined with excision of the inner nasal skin is a safe and effective surgical procedure for correcting nostril exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":"101 ","pages":"40-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142873710","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of lymphatic system transfer (LYST) for treatment of lymphedema: A long-term outcome study of SCIP flap incorporating the lymph nodes and the afferent lymphatic vessels. 淋巴系统转移(LYST)在淋巴水肿治疗中的作用:一项结合淋巴结和传入淋巴管的SCIP皮瓣的长期疗效研究。
Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.052
Hidehiko Yoshimatsu, Min-Jeong Cho, Ryo Karakawa, Akira Okada, Akitatsu Hayashi, Yuma Fuse, Tomoyuki Yano

Background: Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) is traditionally performed in patients with advanced-stage lymphedema. To enhance and promote the physiological effects of VLNT, lymphatic system transfer (LYST) was developed. In this technique, lymph nodes and a portion of their corresponding afferent lymphatic vessels are transferred to stimulate lymphangiogenesis. This study presented our experience, pearls, and pitfalls of using superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator LYST.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients treated with LYST for lymphedema treatment from July 2018 to March 2022 was included. Patient characteristics, perioperative data, and long-term outcomes were analyzed.

Results: Eight patients with unilateral lower-extremity lymphedema underwent LYST. The mean follow-up duration was 39.0 (24.0-60.0) months. The mean improvement in the excess volume percentage compared to the unaffected limb was 11.2% (100% improvement to 0% worsening) at the last follow-up, with statistical significance (p < 0.001). The incidence of cellulitis decreased with statistical significance (p = 0.025).

Conclusion: A long-term study on using LYST flaps in lymphedema treatment has not been previously performed. This study showed that the LYST procedure provides reliable and effective long-term outcomes in treating patients with advanced-stage lymphedema.

背景:血管化淋巴结转移(VLNT)传统上用于晚期淋巴水肿患者。为了增强和促进VLNT的生理作用,淋巴系统转移(LYST)被开发出来。在这种技术中,淋巴结及其相应的一部分传入淋巴管被转移以刺激淋巴管生成。本研究介绍了我们使用旋髂浅动脉穿支LYST的经验、要点和缺陷。方法:回顾性分析2018年7月至2022年3月接受LYST治疗淋巴水肿的患者。分析患者特征、围手术期资料和长期结果。结果:8例单侧下肢淋巴水肿患者行LYST治疗。平均随访时间为39.0(24.0 ~ 60.0)个月。最后一次随访时,与未受影响肢体相比,多余体积百分比的平均改善为11.2%(100%改善,0%恶化),差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。蜂窝织炎发生率降低,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.025)。结论:LYST皮瓣用于淋巴水肿治疗的长期研究尚未完成。这项研究表明,LYST手术在治疗晚期淋巴水肿患者方面提供了可靠和有效的长期结果。
{"title":"The role of lymphatic system transfer (LYST) for treatment of lymphedema: A long-term outcome study of SCIP flap incorporating the lymph nodes and the afferent lymphatic vessels.","authors":"Hidehiko Yoshimatsu, Min-Jeong Cho, Ryo Karakawa, Akira Okada, Akitatsu Hayashi, Yuma Fuse, Tomoyuki Yano","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.052","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.052","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) is traditionally performed in patients with advanced-stage lymphedema. To enhance and promote the physiological effects of VLNT, lymphatic system transfer (LYST) was developed. In this technique, lymph nodes and a portion of their corresponding afferent lymphatic vessels are transferred to stimulate lymphangiogenesis. This study presented our experience, pearls, and pitfalls of using superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator LYST.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients treated with LYST for lymphedema treatment from July 2018 to March 2022 was included. Patient characteristics, perioperative data, and long-term outcomes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight patients with unilateral lower-extremity lymphedema underwent LYST. The mean follow-up duration was 39.0 (24.0-60.0) months. The mean improvement in the excess volume percentage compared to the unaffected limb was 11.2% (100% improvement to 0% worsening) at the last follow-up, with statistical significance (p < 0.001). The incidence of cellulitis decreased with statistical significance (p = 0.025).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A long-term study on using LYST flaps in lymphedema treatment has not been previously performed. This study showed that the LYST procedure provides reliable and effective long-term outcomes in treating patients with advanced-stage lymphedema.</p>","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":"101 ","pages":"15-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142873742","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rhinophyma treatment: An observational study comparing the results of the cold blade technique and ablative fractional CO2-laser. 鼻肿治疗:一项观察性研究,比较冷刀技术和烧蚀分数co2激光的结果。
Pub Date : 2024-11-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.053
Sahar Vanessa Amiri, Cecilie Mullerup Laustsen-Kiel, Berit Carlsen, Elisabeth Taudorf, Jørgen Hesselfeldt, Gregor Borut Jemec, Jeanette Kaae

Experts have widely discussed rhinophyma treatment, proposing and testing various therapies over the years. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the aesthetic outcomes of patients undergoing the cold blade technique at the Department of Plastic Surgery and ablative fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser treatment at the Department of Dermatology at Zealand University Hospital. We assessed rhinophyma severity using the RHISI scale with pre-and post-operative photographs evaluated by senior consultants from each department, who were blinded to the treatment method. Additionally, the patients completed a questionnaire to gauge their satisfaction and willingness to recommend the procedure. Cosmetic outcomes were deemed excellent or good (75% for surgery and 71% for CO2-laser) in both treatment methods. Only one patient answered with moderate satisfaction. Therefore, we recommend both methods as possible treatment options.

多年来,专家们广泛讨论了鼻肿的治疗方法,提出并测试了各种治疗方法。本回顾性研究的目的是比较在新西兰大学医院整形外科接受冷刀技术的患者和在新西兰大学医院皮肤科接受消融二氧化碳(CO2)激光治疗的患者的美学效果。我们使用RHISI量表评估鼻肿严重程度,并由每个科室的高级顾问评估术前和术后照片,他们对治疗方法不知情。此外,患者还完成了一份调查问卷,以评估他们对推荐手术的满意度和意愿。两种治疗方法的美容效果都被认为是优秀或良好(75%的手术和71%的co2激光)。只有一名患者回答满意程度中等。因此,我们推荐这两种方法作为可能的治疗选择。
{"title":"Rhinophyma treatment: An observational study comparing the results of the cold blade technique and ablative fractional CO<sub>2</sub>-laser.","authors":"Sahar Vanessa Amiri, Cecilie Mullerup Laustsen-Kiel, Berit Carlsen, Elisabeth Taudorf, Jørgen Hesselfeldt, Gregor Borut Jemec, Jeanette Kaae","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.053","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Experts have widely discussed rhinophyma treatment, proposing and testing various therapies over the years. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the aesthetic outcomes of patients undergoing the cold blade technique at the Department of Plastic Surgery and ablative fractional carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) laser treatment at the Department of Dermatology at Zealand University Hospital. We assessed rhinophyma severity using the RHISI scale with pre-and post-operative photographs evaluated by senior consultants from each department, who were blinded to the treatment method. Additionally, the patients completed a questionnaire to gauge their satisfaction and willingness to recommend the procedure. Cosmetic outcomes were deemed excellent or good (75% for surgery and 71% for CO<sub>2</sub>-laser) in both treatment methods. Only one patient answered with moderate satisfaction. Therefore, we recommend both methods as possible treatment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":94104,"journal":{"name":"Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS","volume":"101 ","pages":"90-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142879169","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1