Journal of the American Geriatrics Society最新文献

Background: Nocturia (waking from sleep at night to void) and chronic insomnia frequently co-exist in older adults, contributing synergistically to sleep disturbance. Treatments typically target either nocturia or insomnia rather than simultaneously addressing shared mechanisms for these disorders.

Methods: We conducted a multisite feasibility study to: (1) test and refine a protocol for recruitment, randomization, and assessment of older adults with co-existing nocturia and insomnia; and (2) examine preliminary changes in outcome measures to inform a future larger, multisite clinical trial. Participants were men and women aged 60 years and older recruited from outpatient clinics, reporting an average of two or more nocturia episodes per night over the past 4 weeks and meeting diagnostic criteria for chronic insomnia disorder. Participants were randomized to receive either integrated cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia and nocturia or a health education control program involving five weekly visits with a trained nurse practitioner interventionist. Outcomes (e.g., nocturia episodes) were measured 1-week post-treatment and 4-month post-randomization. Descriptive statistics examined the feasibility of outcomes to guide preparations for a future efficacy trial.

Results: Of 245 adults screened, 55% were ineligible and 25% declined to participate. Sixty-one percent of 49 participants who provided informed consent were randomized. Of the 30 participants randomized (mean age = 70.6 years, 60% White), 14 were assigned to integrated cognitive-behavioral treatment and 16 to the control group. All randomized participants provided 4-month follow-up data. At 4 months, mean nightly nocturia episodes decreased by 0.9 (SD 1.0) in the integrated treatment group and by 0.2 (SD 1.2) in the control group compared with baseline.

Discussion: Findings demonstrate the feasibility of recruiting, randomizing, and collecting outcome data from older adults (predominantly male) assigned to an integrated cognitive-behavioral therapy for coexisting insomnia and nocturia or a health education control program.

Background: Poor respiratory function, including low peak expiratory flow (PEF), is a risk factor for dementia. Motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) is a predementia syndrome characterized by slow gait and subjective cognitive complaints. However, the association between PEF and MCR remains unclear. This study examined the cross-sectional and longitudinal association between PEF and MCR.

Methods: The National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), which is a nationally representative cohort of adults ≥65 years of age in the United States, was analyzed from 2011 to 2017. Logistic regression and discrete-time proportional hazards models tested the association of PEF standardized residuals (SR) at baseline with prevalent and incident MCR, respectively. The models adjusted for multiple sociodemographic and health-related covariates.

Results: Among 5328 participants (57% women) included at baseline, lower PEF SR was associated with higher prevalence of MCR. Compared with the ≥80 PEF SR percentile group, the <30 and 30-50 percentile groups had significantly higher odds of prevalent MCR (OR 3.04 [95% CI 1.85, 5.01]; OR 2.06 [95% CI 1.19, 3.54], respectively). Over six years of follow-up, lower PEF SR was also associated with higher incidence of MCR. Compared with the ≥80 PEF SR percentile group, the <30 and 30-50 percentile groups had significantly higher risk of incident MCR (HR 1.81 [95% CI 1.24, 2.66]; HR 1.55 [95% CI 1.02, 2.34], respectively).

Conclusions: Lower PEF was associated with higher prevalence and incidence of MCR. Poor respiratory function should be further investigated as a potentially modifiable risk factor for MCR and cognitive decline.

Background: Multiple trigger tools have been developed to identify medication-related hospital (re)admissions (MRRs); however, the accuracy of these tools in real-world clinical practice is uncertain. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of four different trigger tools (OPERAM, STOPP/START criteria, ADR-tool, and QUADRAT) to identify MRRs compared with clinical adjudication.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of patients readmitted within 30 days to seven departments of a teaching hospital. In the primary study, which involved a retrospective chart review of 1111 readmissions, MRRs and their potential preventability were clinically adjudicated by physicians and pharmacists. In the current study, four trigger tools were applied by a different physician and pharmacist panel. Patients of all ages were included. Trigger tools included both explicit items specifying the event and the associated medication and implicit items requiring clinical knowledge. The accuracy of each trigger tool was assessed by calculating the proportion of clinically adjudicated MRRs each tool identified overall as well as according to explicit and implicit triggers separately. The accuracy of each tool to identify potentially preventable MRRs was also calculated.

Results: Of 1111 readmissions, 181 were adjudicated as medication-related (mean age 69 years, 56% male); 72 (40%) MRRs were potentially preventable. The original OPERAM tool identified 166 (92%) MRRs (62% through explicit triggers). The STOPP/START criteria identified 23 (13%, 7% through explicit triggers), the ADR tool identified 51 (28%, all explicit triggers), and the QUADRAT tool identified 76 (42%; all explicit triggers) MRRs. Of the 72 potentially preventable MRRs, OPERAM identified 59 (82%), STOPP/START identified 18 (25%), ADR identified 20 (28%), and QUADRAT identified 21 (29%).

Conclusion: The original OPERAM tool identified the highest proportion of (preventable) MRRs. However, this tool includes many implicit triggers requiring expert clinical knowledge. Future studies should assess the practicality of implementing this tool in daily practice.

Background: For the thousands of health systems recognized as Age-Friendly, considerable progress has been made to integrate 4Ms into clinical care. This study evaluated associations between 4Ms documentation and patient characteristics in an inpatient setting.

Methods: In this prospective cohort, hospitalizations included were from patients in an Acute Care for Elders (ACE) unit where the 4Ms were adopted and implemented. Each M (What Matters, Medication, Mentation, and Mobility) was stratified into three categories (not documented, partly documented, and fully documented) reflecting "assessment" and "action" clinical care processes. Electronic health records were reviewed for patient and hospitalization characteristics. Descriptive statistics evaluated these characteristics across categories of each M.

Results: There were 620 hospital encounters (573 patients) included in the cohort. Patients had a median age of 80 years [IQR 76, 86] and 85% were White. Of all 4Ms, What Matters had the lowest documentation with 413 (67%) of encounters falling into the not documented group. Medication had the highest documentation with 453 (73%) of encounters in the fully documented group. Significant differences in documentation were associated with age and partly versus fully documented Mobility (80 [76, 86] and 82 [77, 88] (p = 0.019)). Hospital length of stay was differentially associated with documentation of all 4M categories. Initial mobility scores were associated with not versus partly documented Medication (6 [2, 7] and 2 [2, 6] (p = 0.041)).

Conclusions: We developed a structured way to categorize "assessment" and "action" 4Ms care processes reflective of three documentation categories in the hospital (not, partly, and fully) and identified important patient and hospital characteristics associated with each. These results offer opportunities for future improvement efforts and insight to which characteristics may be important to measure with wider 4Ms adoption and uptake.

Background: Participating in recommended levels of physical activity (PA) is critical for preventing functional decline, falls, and frailty, making it essential to identify older adults not meeting national PA guidelines. However, guidance on assessing older adult PA levels, particularly in clinical settings, is lacking. This article presents an overview of clinically feasible PA assessment tools for older adults, identifies gaps in current tools, and provides recommendations on addressing these gaps.

Methods: We conducted a literature review on clinically feasible PA assessment tools, suggested modifications to an existing PA assessment for older adult patients, and highlighted opportunities for integrating the modified PA assessment tool in clinical settings.

Results: We identified 16 PA assessment tools used in clinical settings. The most widely used tool is the Physical Activity Vital Sign (PAVS), which has been successfully integrated into several electronic health records (EHR) and clinical practices. Most tools, including the PAVS, primarily focus on aerobic activities, with limited consideration for strength and balance. We recommend the use of a Modified PAVS for Older Adults that includes items on muscle-strengthening and balance activities to better align with national PA guidelines. We then identified several existing opportunities for broad implementation of the Modified PAVS for Older Adults within clinical settings.

Conclusions: Widespread integration of the Modified PAVS for Older Adults will better support healthcare providers in identifying individuals not meeting national PA recommendations, assisting them in prescribing tailored PA prescriptions and better connecting their patients to appropriate resources and professionals for further support.

Background: The purpose of this project was to measure satisfaction with virtual comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGA) among older Veterans (OVs).

Methods: The CGA involved five different healthcare providers and four one-hour VA Video Connect (VVC) calls. Using specific enrollment criteria, OVs were recruited in four cohorts separated by time. After completing the CGA, participants were asked to complete a 10-statement telephone questionnaire. Before analyses, responses to each statement were dichotomized as Agree (Agree/Strongly agree) or Do not Agree (Neutral/Disagree/Strongly Disagree). Descriptive statistics and Binomial generalized linear models (GLMs) were used to analyze the data.

Results: All 269 enrolled OVs completed all components of the CGA. This included 79, 57, 61, and 72 Veterans in cohorts 1 to 4, respectively. Their average age was 76.0 ± 5.9 years, and they were predominately white (82%), male (94%), and residents of rural settings (64%). Of the 236 (88%) OVs who completed the telephone survey, 57% indicated they were comfortable using VVC and 57% expressed willingness to use VVC again; 44% felt that VVC was easier than going to in-person visits. The OVs in Cohort 1 were more likely to agree with these statements than those in the remaining cohorts, especially Cohorts 2 and 4. Differences in demographics partially explained some of these findings. The majority (89% or higher) of survey participants agreed with the remaining seven survey statements indicating they were satisfied with the CGA program.

Conclusion: OVs were very satisfied with their participation in a program of CGA, although not necessarily the mode of delivery. The percentage of participants who indicated discomfort using VVC for the CGA visits appeared to increase with time. Further work is needed to determine which OVs would be the best candidates to use VVC to complete all or part of a CGA.

Objectives: This study aims to summarize the existing research literature examining Medicare-skilled home health (HH) utilization and clinical outcomes for persons with dementia (PwD). We sought to answer the following questions: (1) How is dementia defined and classified in the HH literature? (2) What associations have been observed between dementia status and patterns of HH utilization? (3) What associations have been observed between dementia status and HH outcomes?

Methods: Using Arksey and O'Malley's framework for scoping reviews, we searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and select relevant journals for quantitative studies conducted in the United States between 2000 and 2023 examining Medicare HH use and outcomes for PwD. We describe and compare approaches to classify dementia, identify findings related to HH utilization and outcomes supported by the preponderance of evidence, and comment on existing gaps and areas of ambiguity in the literature.

Results: Thirty-two articles met the inclusion criteria. Most used claims-based data to classify dementia, leveraged national data, and were limited to traditional Medicare beneficiaries. Studies found meaningful differences in HH utilization by dementia status; most notably, PwD were more likely to access HH without a preceding hospitalization, had longer lengths of stay, and incurred higher HH costs. Literature relating to clinical outcomes was more difficult to interpret, due to significant variation in study objectives, samples, and outcome measures which prompted more nuanced and even contradictory conclusions. There is a dearth of research identifying how specific HH care pathways (e.g., service types, visit frequency) impact outcomes for this patient population.

Conclusions: This review supports the understanding that PwD are a unique subpopulation of HH patients who require special attention in policy development and evaluation. Critical research is needed to examine clinical outcomes in PwD further to inform practice and improve care quality.