Pub Date : 2025-12-13eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf257
Rahim Abo Kasem, Lydia A Leavitt, Gina Genova, Brian N Snyder, Isaac J Abecassis, Adrianna H Masters, Guneet Sarai, Brian J Williams, Jonathan Beall, Akshitkumar M Mistry
Purpose: High-grade gliomas are among the most treatment-resistant cancers, with few therapies improving survival despite hundreds of clinical trials. The biostatistical parameters used to design these trials are critical but uncharacterized in aggregate. Currently, no data-driven benchmarks exist to inform these parameters, including the target effect size. This study therefore aimed to analyze trends in their use across neuro-oncology trials.
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed for publications of phase 2 and 3 high-grade glioma or medulloblastoma trials comparing two or more arms with a time-to-event primary endpoint. Key biostatistical parameters were extracted from each study, including trial phase, endpoints, effect size, control arm survival assumptions, Type I error, power, sample size, and accrual time.
Results: We analyzed 210 trials published between 1976 and 2025, evaluating 254 primary time-to-event endpoints (overall, OS, or progression-free survival or similar). Survival assumptions and target effect sizes (ie, hazard ratios, HRs) used for trial powering varied substantially. Assumed control arm OS was often lower than observed OS, and the application of type I error rates did not consistently reflect the stated hypothesis directionality. Trials with planned sample sizes below 500 and lower HR targets were less likely to meet accrual goals. Trials generally aimed to complete accrual by 36 months with a median follow up of 24 months.
Conclusion: This study provides historical benchmarks for sample size assumptions to support more transparent, data-driven, and context-aware trial design. They may also serve as a resource for feasibility planning, protocol development, and statistical justification in future trials.
{"title":"Biostatistical benchmarking of neuro-oncology trials.","authors":"Rahim Abo Kasem, Lydia A Leavitt, Gina Genova, Brian N Snyder, Isaac J Abecassis, Adrianna H Masters, Guneet Sarai, Brian J Williams, Jonathan Beall, Akshitkumar M Mistry","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf257","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf257","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>High-grade gliomas are among the most treatment-resistant cancers, with few therapies improving survival despite hundreds of clinical trials. The biostatistical parameters used to design these trials are critical but uncharacterized in aggregate. Currently, no data-driven benchmarks exist to inform these parameters, including the target effect size. This study therefore aimed to analyze trends in their use across neuro-oncology trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed for publications of phase 2 and 3 high-grade glioma or medulloblastoma trials comparing two or more arms with a time-to-event primary endpoint. Key biostatistical parameters were extracted from each study, including trial phase, endpoints, effect size, control arm survival assumptions, Type I error, power, sample size, and accrual time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 210 trials published between 1976 and 2025, evaluating 254 primary time-to-event endpoints (overall, OS, or progression-free survival or similar). Survival assumptions and target effect sizes (ie, hazard ratios, HRs) used for trial powering varied substantially. Assumed control arm OS was often lower than observed OS, and the application of type I error rates did not consistently reflect the stated hypothesis directionality. Trials with planned sample sizes below 500 and lower HR targets were less likely to meet accrual goals. Trials generally aimed to complete accrual by 36 months with a median follow up of 24 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides historical benchmarks for sample size assumptions to support more transparent, data-driven, and context-aware trial design. They may also serve as a resource for feasibility planning, protocol development, and statistical justification in future trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"8 1","pages":"vdaf257"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12901639/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146204297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-10eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf256
Jeremy Deverdun, Guillaume Clain, Margaux Verdier, Hugues Duffau, Liesjet E H Van Dokkum, Nicolas Menjot de Champfleur, Justine Meriadec, Mathilde Carriere, Amelie Darlix, Emmanuelle Le Bars
Background: Monitoring diffuse lower-grade glioma (DLGG) evolution on MRI is challenging due to their infiltrative nature and post-surgical deformations. The RANO criteria recommend assessing the 2D tumor size, but volume analysis remains the gold standard for calculating growth rate. Manual tumor segmentation, however, is time-consuming, limiting its use in clinical practice. Automated segmentation tools like nnU-Net are promising but require clinical validation.
Methods: We used 1971 MRI exams from 207 DLGG patients to train and validate an in house-developed nnU-Net al.orithm. The dataset included scans from various MRI systems, with 2D and 3D FLAIR and T1-weighted acquisitions, that were divided into derivation (N = 1771) and validation (N = 200) sets with matching 2D and 3D FLAIR ratios. The algorithm's automated segmentations (AS) were compared with manual segmentations (MS) by expert neuroradiologists using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Intersection over Union (IoU). Tumor volume and mean tumor diameter (MTD) were compared using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and Bland-Altman tests.
Results: The median nnU-Net DSC and IoU were 0.93 and 0.86, respectively. In the validation cohort, 64% of exams had excellent (≥0.9), 31% good ([0.7-0.9]), 3.5% unsatisfactory ([0.5-0.7]), and 1.5% poor DSC (<0.5). Higher DSC correlated with larger tumor volumes (P < .001). Tumor volume and MTD showed near-perfect concordance between AS and MS (CCC: 0.991 and 0.989, respectively).
Conclusions: Our automated nnU-Net segmentation tool demonstrates high accuracy and potential for clinical integration, enhancing DLGG monitoring and management.
{"title":"Beyond proof-of-concept: Validating robust automated diffuse lower-grade glioma segmentation for clinical applications in longitudinal follow-up.","authors":"Jeremy Deverdun, Guillaume Clain, Margaux Verdier, Hugues Duffau, Liesjet E H Van Dokkum, Nicolas Menjot de Champfleur, Justine Meriadec, Mathilde Carriere, Amelie Darlix, Emmanuelle Le Bars","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf256","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf256","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monitoring diffuse lower-grade glioma (DLGG) evolution on MRI is challenging due to their infiltrative nature and post-surgical deformations. The RANO criteria recommend assessing the 2D tumor size, but volume analysis remains the gold standard for calculating growth rate. Manual tumor segmentation, however, is time-consuming, limiting its use in clinical practice. Automated segmentation tools like nnU-Net are promising but require clinical validation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used 1971 MRI exams from 207 DLGG patients to train and validate an in house-developed nnU-Net al.orithm. The dataset included scans from various MRI systems, with 2D and 3D FLAIR and T1-weighted acquisitions, that were divided into derivation (<i>N</i> = 1771) and validation (<i>N</i> = 200) sets with matching 2D and 3D FLAIR ratios. The algorithm's automated segmentations (AS) were compared with manual segmentations (MS) by expert neuroradiologists using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Intersection over Union (IoU). Tumor volume and mean tumor diameter (MTD) were compared using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) and Bland-Altman tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median nnU-Net DSC and IoU were 0.93 and 0.86, respectively. In the validation cohort, 64% of exams had excellent (≥0.9), 31% good ([0.7-0.9]), 3.5% unsatisfactory ([0.5-0.7]), and 1.5% poor DSC (<0.5). Higher DSC correlated with larger tumor volumes (<i>P</i> < .001). Tumor volume and MTD showed near-perfect concordance between AS and MS (CCC: 0.991 and 0.989, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our automated nnU-Net segmentation tool demonstrates high accuracy and potential for clinical integration, enhancing DLGG monitoring and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"8 1","pages":"vdaf256"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12901730/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146204321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-10eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf253
Kyle Malone, Melanie Dugas, Nathalie Earl, Tommy Alain, Robert G Korneluk, Eric LaCasse, Shawn T Beug
Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor with an overall survival under 21 months. Despite extensive research effort, patient outcomes have improved minimally over the past several decades. The Inhibitor of Apoptosis (IAP) proteins are critical survival factors implicated in both immune regulation and gliomagenesis. Small molecule IAP antagonists called SMAC mimetic compounds (SMCs) are under investigation as cancer therapeutics across multiple malignancies, including GBM. SMCs induce GBM cell death in the presence of inflammatory cytokines, synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), and induce death of microglia and macrophages. Although SMCs show significant efficacy in murine models, complete eradication is not achieved. Here, we aimed to understand the limitations of SMCs in murine GBM and identify strategies to enhance efficacy of combination treatment with ICIs with the goal of informing future translational efforts.
Methods: We use animal models, co-culture systems, flow cytometry, and multiplex immunohistochemistry to optimize SMC dosing and delivery, uncovering resistance mechanisms that address key unmet research needs.
Results: We demonstrate that although GBM cells are immunologically recognizable, their location within the central nervous system (CNS) limits effective anti-GBM immunity following SMC and ICI combination therapy. Increasing SMC dose potently improves overall survival, which is associated with reduced intratumoral macrophage content, increased microglial involvement, and peripheral immunoactivation. Given the immunosuppressive role of TGFβ, the incorporation of TGFβ blockade further enhances survival outcomes.
Conclusion: We comprehensively outline how SMCs can be used in conjunction with ICIs to treat GBM and propose strategies to maximize SMC efficacy.
{"title":"Enhanced glioblastoma immunotherapy via SMAC mimetic dose escalation and TGFβ blockade.","authors":"Kyle Malone, Melanie Dugas, Nathalie Earl, Tommy Alain, Robert G Korneluk, Eric LaCasse, Shawn T Beug","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf253","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf253","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor with an overall survival under 21 months. Despite extensive research effort, patient outcomes have improved minimally over the past several decades. The Inhibitor of Apoptosis (IAP) proteins are critical survival factors implicated in both immune regulation and gliomagenesis. Small molecule IAP antagonists called SMAC mimetic compounds (SMCs) are under investigation as cancer therapeutics across multiple malignancies, including GBM. SMCs induce GBM cell death in the presence of inflammatory cytokines, synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), and induce death of microglia and macrophages. Although SMCs show significant efficacy in murine models, complete eradication is not achieved. Here, we aimed to understand the limitations of SMCs in murine GBM and identify strategies to enhance efficacy of combination treatment with ICIs with the goal of informing future translational efforts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We use animal models, co-culture systems, flow cytometry, and multiplex immunohistochemistry to optimize SMC dosing and delivery, uncovering resistance mechanisms that address key unmet research needs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We demonstrate that although GBM cells are immunologically recognizable, their location within the central nervous system (CNS) limits effective anti-GBM immunity following SMC and ICI combination therapy. Increasing SMC dose potently improves overall survival, which is associated with reduced intratumoral macrophage content, increased microglial involvement, and peripheral immunoactivation. Given the immunosuppressive role of TGFβ, the incorporation of TGFβ blockade further enhances survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We comprehensively outline how SMCs can be used in conjunction with ICIs to treat GBM and propose strategies to maximize SMC efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"8 1","pages":"vdaf253"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12901662/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146204314","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-09eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf251
Jan Vaillant, Sangita Pal, Jan Müller, Andrea Wittmann, Akosua Boakye-Yiadom, Philipp Sievers, Paula Zimmer, Melanie Schoof, Franziska Schelb, Nina Hofmann, Michaela-Kristina Keck, Tessa Fabian, Ulrich Schüller, Marc Zuckermann, Rameen Beroukhim, Pratiti Bandopadhayay, David T W Jones, Lena M Kutscher
Background: The developmental context in which genetic alterations occur is crucial to understand disease progression. In pediatric cancer, modeling tumor formation in the right cell type is necessary to faithfully recapitulate the unique nature of pediatric tumors. The Cre-LoxP system is a powerful tool to modulate gene expression in specific cell types at discrete developmental time windows.
Methods: We used Cre-LoxP mouse models to study the role of the oncofetal transcription factor PLAG1 in pediatric brain tumor formation. We characterized our model using histology, DNA methylation based copy number variant (CNV) analysis on fresh frozen and FFPE derived samples, RNA sequencing, whole genome sequencing and whole genome CRISPR Cas9 screening.
Results: We generated a new model for PLAG1 overexpressing brain tumors, but discovered an unexpected CNV at the Nras locus by DNA methylation analysis. We confirmed the CNV via whole genome sequencing and found that it was likely mediated by Cre-recombination at the transgene insertion site. Both the tumor transcriptome and genetic dependencies are substantially shaped by this CNV.
Conclusions: Our work demonstrates the necessity of copy-number analysis when working with transgenic Cre-LoxP mouse models. Assessing CNVs should become a standard evaluation procedure when reporting new tumor models, preventing misleading conclusions that could dramatically impact the reliability of preclinical studies.
{"title":"A Cre-mediated copy number variant compromises the reliability of a <i>LoxP-STOP-LoxP</i>-<i>PLAG1</i> driven brain tumor model.","authors":"Jan Vaillant, Sangita Pal, Jan Müller, Andrea Wittmann, Akosua Boakye-Yiadom, Philipp Sievers, Paula Zimmer, Melanie Schoof, Franziska Schelb, Nina Hofmann, Michaela-Kristina Keck, Tessa Fabian, Ulrich Schüller, Marc Zuckermann, Rameen Beroukhim, Pratiti Bandopadhayay, David T W Jones, Lena M Kutscher","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf251","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf251","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The developmental context in which genetic alterations occur is crucial to understand disease progression. In pediatric cancer, modeling tumor formation in the right cell type is necessary to faithfully recapitulate the unique nature of pediatric tumors. The Cre-LoxP system is a powerful tool to modulate gene expression in specific cell types at discrete developmental time windows.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used Cre-LoxP mouse models to study the role of the oncofetal transcription factor <i>PLAG1</i> in pediatric brain tumor formation. We characterized our model using histology, DNA methylation based copy number variant (CNV) analysis on fresh frozen and FFPE derived samples, RNA sequencing, whole genome sequencing and whole genome CRISPR Cas9 screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We generated a new model for <i>PLAG1</i> overexpressing brain tumors, but discovered an unexpected CNV at the <i>Nras</i> locus by DNA methylation analysis. We confirmed the CNV via whole genome sequencing and found that it was likely mediated by Cre-recombination at the transgene insertion site. Both the tumor transcriptome and genetic dependencies are substantially shaped by this CNV.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our work demonstrates the necessity of copy-number analysis when working with transgenic Cre-LoxP mouse models. Assessing CNVs should become a standard evaluation procedure when reporting new tumor models, preventing misleading conclusions that could dramatically impact the reliability of preclinical studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"8 1","pages":"vdaf251"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12932942/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147313844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-09eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf254
Anan Zhang, Xiang Huang, Yijin Gao, Haiyan Chen, Ibrahim Qaddoumi, Bo Yang, Xiaolong Chen, Anthony Pak-Yin Liu, Rong Zhang
Background: Non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCTs) occur 3.5 times more frequently in Chinese children than in western populations. This study aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes, prognostic factors, and diagnostic challenges in a Chinese cooperative group, with particular focus on the roles of pathology and surgical intervention.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 62 consecutively diagnosed pediatric patients with NGGCT (September 2018-June 2023) from Shanghai Children's Medical Center and Huashan Hospital. NGGCT was diagnosed by histopathology with/without elevated tumor markers (n = 46) or by elevated markers alone (n = 16). All patients received standardized treatment according to Children's Oncology Group ACNS0122 protocol. Whole-exome sequencing was performed on 12 paired tumor-blood samples to characterize molecular alterations.
Results: The study cohort included 49 males and 13 females (median age, 9.8 year). Primary locations were mainly pineal (58%) and suprasellar (29%). Treatment delays (>6 mo) occurred in 21% of patients, particularly those with non-pineal locations and endocrine symptoms. The 3 years event-free survival and overall survival rates were 81.9 ± 5.4% and 91.3 ± 3.7%, respectively. Univariate analysis identified poor prognostic factors: elevated AFP >200 ng/mL, spinal metastases, and lack of complete/partial response after induction chemotherapy. Surgical resection of small residual tumors (<2 cm) provided no survival benefit. Molecular analysis revealed KRAS and KIT as the most frequent mutations, with chromosome 12p abnormalities in 50% of cases.
Conclusions: Standardized multidisciplinary treatment achieves favorable outcomes comparable to international benchmarks. Aggressive surgery does not improve survival when tumor markers normalize. Diagnostic delays remain common, emphasizing the need for improved awareness and referral systems in China.
{"title":"Pre-treatment journey and outcome for children with intracranial non-germinomatous germ cell tumors-the Shanghai experience.","authors":"Anan Zhang, Xiang Huang, Yijin Gao, Haiyan Chen, Ibrahim Qaddoumi, Bo Yang, Xiaolong Chen, Anthony Pak-Yin Liu, Rong Zhang","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf254","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf254","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCTs) occur 3.5 times more frequently in Chinese children than in western populations. This study aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes, prognostic factors, and diagnostic challenges in a Chinese cooperative group, with particular focus on the roles of pathology and surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 62 consecutively diagnosed pediatric patients with NGGCT (September 2018-June 2023) from Shanghai Children's Medical Center and Huashan Hospital. NGGCT was diagnosed by histopathology with/without elevated tumor markers (<i>n</i> = 46) or by elevated markers alone (<i>n</i> = 16). All patients received standardized treatment according to Children's Oncology Group ACNS0122 protocol. Whole-exome sequencing was performed on 12 paired tumor-blood samples to characterize molecular alterations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort included 49 males and 13 females (median age, 9.8 year). Primary locations were mainly pineal (58%) and suprasellar (29%). Treatment delays (>6 mo) occurred in 21% of patients, particularly those with non-pineal locations and endocrine symptoms. The 3 years event-free survival and overall survival rates were 81.9 ± 5.4% and 91.3 ± 3.7%, respectively. Univariate analysis identified poor prognostic factors: elevated AFP >200 ng/mL, spinal metastases, and lack of complete/partial response after induction chemotherapy. Surgical resection of small residual tumors (<2 cm) provided no survival benefit. Molecular analysis revealed <i>KRAS</i> and <i>KIT</i> as the most frequent mutations, with chromosome 12p abnormalities in 50% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Standardized multidisciplinary treatment achieves favorable outcomes comparable to international benchmarks. Aggressive surgery does not improve survival when tumor markers normalize. Diagnostic delays remain common, emphasizing the need for improved awareness and referral systems in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"8 1","pages":"vdaf254"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12888384/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146168627","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-09eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf252
Alice Gantner, Hélène Dubois-Pot-Schneider, Hélène Dumond
The 2021 WHO classification of brain tumors emphasizes integrating molecular features with histopathology, notably redefining astrocytoma and glioblastoma entities. Recent research underscores the influence of sex hormones in glioblastoma development and therapy response. This review focuses on the 5-year updated understanding of the role of nuclear and membrane receptors in glioblastoma biology and therapy. Notably, androgen receptor expression is linked to worse outcomes, but recent studies suggest androgen signaling might sustain anti-tumor immunity. Estrogen receptor subtypes, as well as nuclear or membrane progesterone receptors, show divergent roles. Beyond classical nuclear receptors, attention is paid to membrane-bound and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which regulate key pathways in glioblastoma progression. Among them, G protein-coupled membrane estrogen receptor, the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor, is gaining attention for its ability to modulate cell proliferation and tumor behavior. CXCR4, a chemokine receptor, is now seen as a critical driver of tumor growth and immune evasion. Cannabinoid receptors are also implicated in glioblastoma proliferation and drug resistance. Dopamine receptors, particularly DRD2 and DRD3, are emerging as regulators of glioblastoma stem cell maintenance and therapy resistance. Targeting hormone and GPCR-related pathways, especially considering sex-specific factors, offers promising avenues for developing personalized glioblastoma treatments and enhancing current therapy outcomes.
{"title":"Nuclear and membrane-bound hormone receptors in glioblastoma: Expression, functionality, and therapeutic implications.","authors":"Alice Gantner, Hélène Dubois-Pot-Schneider, Hélène Dumond","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf252","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdaf252","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 2021 WHO classification of brain tumors emphasizes integrating molecular features with histopathology, notably redefining astrocytoma and glioblastoma entities. Recent research underscores the influence of sex hormones in glioblastoma development and therapy response. This review focuses on the 5-year updated understanding of the role of nuclear and membrane receptors in glioblastoma biology and therapy. Notably, androgen receptor expression is linked to worse outcomes, but recent studies suggest androgen signaling might sustain anti-tumor immunity. Estrogen receptor subtypes, as well as nuclear or membrane progesterone receptors, show divergent roles. Beyond classical nuclear receptors, attention is paid to membrane-bound and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which regulate key pathways in glioblastoma progression. Among them, G protein-coupled membrane estrogen receptor, the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor, is gaining attention for its ability to modulate cell proliferation and tumor behavior. CXCR4, a chemokine receptor, is now seen as a critical driver of tumor growth and immune evasion. Cannabinoid receptors are also implicated in glioblastoma proliferation and drug resistance. Dopamine receptors, particularly DRD2 and DRD3, are emerging as regulators of glioblastoma stem cell maintenance and therapy resistance. Targeting hormone and GPCR-related pathways, especially considering sex-specific factors, offers promising avenues for developing personalized glioblastoma treatments and enhancing current therapy outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"8 1","pages":"vdaf252"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12948939/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147328894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-08eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf255
Lou Van Eupen, Anthony Waked, Irina Primac, Koen Vermeulen, Isabeau De Bie, Mohammed Abderrafi Benotmane, Roel Quintens
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor, characterized by rapid progression, extensive inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity, and resistance to standard-of-care, including radiotherapy. Radiotherapy remains a cornerstone of GBM management, but its efficacy is limited by complex tumor biology and mechanisms of radioresistance. This review explores the advances in radiotherapy for GBM, focusing on the interplay between tumor biology and emerging treatment strategies. Hallmarks of GBM biology, including hypoxia, the robust DNA repair mechanisms, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), and the extensive plasticity contribute to therapeutic resistance. Innovative approaches in radiotherapy may allow to address these challenges. Charged particle therapies (CPTs), including proton and carbon ion therapy, offer superior precision and enhanced biological effectiveness by delivering lethal doses to tumor cells while sparing surrounding healthy tissue. FLASH therapy, using ultra-high dose rates, could reduce normal tissue toxicity without compromising tumor control. Furthermore, targeted radionuclide therapy harnesses tumor-specific targets to systemically deliver radiopharmaceuticals carrying therapeutic radionuclides directly to cancer cells, improving specificity and reducing off-target effects. This review highlights the promise of these novel radiotherapy modalities to address GBM's inherent heterogeneity and treatment resistance. By integrating advancements in technology with novel insights into GBM biology, these approaches may significantly improve patient outcomes.
{"title":"Innovative radiotherapies for the treatment of glioblastoma.","authors":"Lou Van Eupen, Anthony Waked, Irina Primac, Koen Vermeulen, Isabeau De Bie, Mohammed Abderrafi Benotmane, Roel Quintens","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf255","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf255","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor, characterized by rapid progression, extensive inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity, and resistance to standard-of-care, including radiotherapy. Radiotherapy remains a cornerstone of GBM management, but its efficacy is limited by complex tumor biology and mechanisms of radioresistance. This review explores the advances in radiotherapy for GBM, focusing on the interplay between tumor biology and emerging treatment strategies. Hallmarks of GBM biology, including hypoxia, the robust DNA repair mechanisms, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), and the extensive plasticity contribute to therapeutic resistance. Innovative approaches in radiotherapy may allow to address these challenges. Charged particle therapies (CPTs), including proton and carbon ion therapy, offer superior precision and enhanced biological effectiveness by delivering lethal doses to tumor cells while sparing surrounding healthy tissue. FLASH therapy, using ultra-high dose rates, could reduce normal tissue toxicity without compromising tumor control. Furthermore, targeted radionuclide therapy harnesses tumor-specific targets to systemically deliver radiopharmaceuticals carrying therapeutic radionuclides directly to cancer cells, improving specificity and reducing off-target effects. This review highlights the promise of these novel radiotherapy modalities to address GBM's inherent heterogeneity and treatment resistance. By integrating advancements in technology with novel insights into GBM biology, these approaches may significantly improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"8 1","pages":"vdaf255"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12893782/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146184110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-08eCollection Date: 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf250
Vihang Nakhate, Catharina Westergaard, Zhou Lan, Aleksandra B Lasica, Alona Muzikansky, Brooke Barlow, Alyssa Russ, Loai Aker, Albert Jiao, Ian Pan, Thomas A Nelson, Chibueze D Nwagwu, Elisa Aquilanti, Tracy T Batchelor, Rameen Beroukhim, Tamar R Berger, Ugonma Chukwueke, L Nicolas Gonzalez Castro, Eudocia Quant Lee, J Ricardo Mcfaline-Figueroa, Lakshmi Nayak, John Y Rhee, David A Reardon, Raymond Y Huang, Patrick Y Wen, Gilbert Youssef
Background: Sex differences in glioblastoma (GBM) are recognized, but their treatment implications remain unclear. Recent preclinical studies have characterized mechanisms of sex-biased anti-tumor immunity in GBM, and have found in murine models that males derive greater survival benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). We evaluated sex differences associated with ICI in GBM patients.
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with newly diagnosed GBM (nGBM) or recurrent GBM (rGBM) treated with ICI on clinical trials at one institution from 2014 to 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, univariate and multivariable regression models. Sex-by-treatment interactions were assessed relative to a concurrent reference group treated on non-ICI clinical trials.
Results: 296 patients with nGBM (58% male, 19% ICI) and 458 patients with rGBM (60% male, 40% ICI) were evaluated. In nGBM, ICI was not associated with sex difference in PFS (HRmale 1.35; 95% CI, 0.62-2.95; P = .446; Pinteraction = .142) or OS (HRmale 1.15 [0.53-2.53], P = .722; Pinteraction = .438) compared to non-ICI treatment. In rGBM, males receiving ICI had worse OS (HRmale 1.64 [1.09-2.47], P = .017) and trended towards worse PFS (HRmale 1.41 [0.94-2.11], P = .095), but sex differences with ICI were not significantly different compared to non-ICI treatment (PFS Pinteraction = .610; OS Pinteraction = .361). No sex differences were observed when all immunotherapies were analyzed collectively.
Conclusion: In nGBM and rGBM, ICI therapy was not associated with sex difference in PFS or OS. Clinically meaningful sex-based outcome differences may be better understood by prospective evaluation in clinical trials.
背景:胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)的性别差异是公认的,但其治疗意义尚不清楚。最近的临床前研究描述了GBM中性别偏倚的抗肿瘤免疫机制,并在小鼠模型中发现,雄性从免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)中获得更大的生存益处。我们评估了GBM患者与ICI相关的性别差异。方法:回顾性评估2014年至2022年在一家机构接受ICI治疗的连续新诊断GBM (nGBM)或复发性GBM (rGBM)临床试验患者。通过Kaplan-Meier分析、单变量和多变量回归模型评估无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。相对于同时接受非ici临床试验的参照组,评估治疗性别间的相互作用。结果:对296例nGBM患者(58%男性,19% ICI)和458例rGBM患者(60%男性,40% ICI)进行了评估。在nGBM中,ICI与PFS的性别差异无关(HRmale 1.35; 95% CI, 0.62-2.95; P = .446; P交互作用=。142)或OS (HRmale 1.15 [0.53-2.53], P = .722;438)与非ici治疗相比。在rGBM中,接受ICI的男性OS较差(HRmale 1.64 [1.09-2.47], P =。[0.94-2.11], P =。095),但与非ICI治疗相比,ICI治疗的性别差异无显著性差异(PFS P互作= .610;OS P互作= .361)。当对所有免疫疗法进行集体分析时,没有观察到性别差异。结论:在nGBM和rGBM中,ICI治疗与PFS或OS的性别差异无关。临床有意义的基于性别的结果差异可以通过临床试验的前瞻性评价来更好地理解。
{"title":"Evaluation of sex differences in survival among glioblastoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.","authors":"Vihang Nakhate, Catharina Westergaard, Zhou Lan, Aleksandra B Lasica, Alona Muzikansky, Brooke Barlow, Alyssa Russ, Loai Aker, Albert Jiao, Ian Pan, Thomas A Nelson, Chibueze D Nwagwu, Elisa Aquilanti, Tracy T Batchelor, Rameen Beroukhim, Tamar R Berger, Ugonma Chukwueke, L Nicolas Gonzalez Castro, Eudocia Quant Lee, J Ricardo Mcfaline-Figueroa, Lakshmi Nayak, John Y Rhee, David A Reardon, Raymond Y Huang, Patrick Y Wen, Gilbert Youssef","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf250","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf250","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sex differences in glioblastoma (GBM) are recognized, but their treatment implications remain unclear. Recent preclinical studies have characterized mechanisms of sex-biased anti-tumor immunity in GBM, and have found in murine models that males derive greater survival benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). We evaluated sex differences associated with ICI in GBM patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients with newly diagnosed GBM (nGBM) or recurrent GBM (rGBM) treated with ICI on clinical trials at one institution from 2014 to 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, univariate and multivariable regression models. Sex-by-treatment interactions were assessed relative to a concurrent reference group treated on non-ICI clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>296 patients with nGBM (58% male, 19% ICI) and 458 patients with rGBM (60% male, 40% ICI) were evaluated. In nGBM, ICI was not associated with sex difference in PFS (HR<sub>male</sub> 1.35; 95% CI, 0.62-2.95; <i>P</i> = .446; <i>P</i> <sub>interaction</sub> = .142) or OS (HR<sub>male</sub> 1.15 [0.53-2.53], <i>P</i> = .722; <i>P</i> <sub>interaction</sub> = .438) compared to non-ICI treatment. In rGBM, males receiving ICI had worse OS (HR<sub>male</sub> 1.64 [1.09-2.47], <i>P</i> = .017) and trended towards worse PFS (HR<sub>male</sub> 1.41 [0.94-2.11], <i>P</i> = .095), but sex differences with ICI were not significantly different compared to non-ICI treatment (PFS <i>P</i> <sub>interaction</sub> = .610; OS <i>P</i> <sub>interaction</sub> = .361). No sex differences were observed when all immunotherapies were analyzed collectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In nGBM and rGBM, ICI therapy was not associated with sex difference in PFS or OS. Clinically meaningful sex-based outcome differences may be better understood by prospective evaluation in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"8 1","pages":"vdaf250"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12901605/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146204413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-05eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf218
Christoph Oster, Pia Reineck, Teresa Schmidt, Jana Grieger, Sandeep Sharma, Jonas Feldheim, Kathrin Kizina, Giorgio Cappello, Leon Jekel, Kim M Pabst, Yahya Ahmadipour, Hanah Karadachi, Laurèl Rauschenbach, Lazaros Lazaridis, Nika Guberina, Christoph Pöttgen, Tobias Blau, Kathy Keyvani, Björn Scheffler, Ken Herrmann, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Ulrich Sure, Martin Stuschke, Martin Glas, Sied Kebir
Background: Glioblastoma represents one of the most aggressive and fatal primary brain tumors in adults. Chemotherapeutic agents, while integral to management, frequently induce varying levels of myelotoxicity. The aim is to investigate the clinical impact of myelotoxicity in patients treated with the CeTeG versus the Stupp regimen which has not yet been systematically investigated under real-world conditions.
Methods: This retrospective study included patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma who underwent radiochemotherapy. Peripheral blood counts were systematically assessed throughout first-line therapy, starting at the initiation of radiation and continuing until either first disease progression or death, whichever occurred earlier.
Results: Among 161 identified patients, 133 (83%) were assigned to the myelotoxicity cohort and 28 (17%) to the non-myelotoxicity cohort. Female sex was independently associated with a higher incidence of myelotoxicity (p = 0.007). In multivariate analysis leukopenia ≥ grade 2 was significantly associated with improved progression-free and overall survival in both the overall and CeTeG cohorts. Neutropenia ≥ grade 2 similarly correlated with improved survival outcomes in the overall cohort. Prophylaxis against pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia was associated with a significant survival advantage in both the overall and Stupp cohorts, as was lymphopenia grade 3-4.
Conclusion: Myelotoxicity at the time of glioblastoma diagnosis does not seem to be detrimental to patient outcomes. Our findings highlight the importance of pneumocystis jiroveci prophylaxis in the Stupp regimen. This raises the intriguing question of whether future chemotherapy dosages could be tailored based on individual blood values, potentially exceeding current standard doses. Prospective studies are needed to explore these possibilities, including the feasibility of high-dose therapies similar to those used in leukemia treatment.
{"title":"Distribution and prognostic significance of myelotoxicity in newly diagnosed glioblastoma in a real-life cohort: Time to treat more aggressively?","authors":"Christoph Oster, Pia Reineck, Teresa Schmidt, Jana Grieger, Sandeep Sharma, Jonas Feldheim, Kathrin Kizina, Giorgio Cappello, Leon Jekel, Kim M Pabst, Yahya Ahmadipour, Hanah Karadachi, Laurèl Rauschenbach, Lazaros Lazaridis, Nika Guberina, Christoph Pöttgen, Tobias Blau, Kathy Keyvani, Björn Scheffler, Ken Herrmann, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Ulrich Sure, Martin Stuschke, Martin Glas, Sied Kebir","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf218","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf218","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glioblastoma represents one of the most aggressive and fatal primary brain tumors in adults. Chemotherapeutic agents, while integral to management, frequently induce varying levels of myelotoxicity. The aim is to investigate the clinical impact of myelotoxicity in patients treated with the CeTeG versus the Stupp regimen which has not yet been systematically investigated under real-world conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma who underwent radiochemotherapy. Peripheral blood counts were systematically assessed throughout first-line therapy, starting at the initiation of radiation and continuing until either first disease progression or death, whichever occurred earlier.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 161 identified patients, 133 (83%) were assigned to the myelotoxicity cohort and 28 (17%) to the non-myelotoxicity cohort. Female sex was independently associated with a higher incidence of myelotoxicity (p = 0.007). In multivariate analysis leukopenia ≥ grade 2 was significantly associated with improved progression-free and overall survival in both the overall and CeTeG cohorts. Neutropenia ≥ grade 2 similarly correlated with improved survival outcomes in the overall cohort. Prophylaxis against pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia was associated with a significant survival advantage in both the overall and Stupp cohorts, as was lymphopenia grade 3-4.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Myelotoxicity at the time of glioblastoma diagnosis does not seem to be detrimental to patient outcomes. Our findings highlight the importance of pneumocystis jiroveci prophylaxis in the Stupp regimen. This raises the intriguing question of whether future chemotherapy dosages could be tailored based on individual blood values, potentially exceeding current standard doses. Prospective studies are needed to explore these possibilities, including the feasibility of high-dose therapies similar to those used in leukemia treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"7 1","pages":"vdaf218"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12768505/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145914265","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-04eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf249
Kevin Thomas Breen, Tuesday Haynes, Matthew Bryce Watowich, Seketoulie Keretsu, Aiguo Li, Yongmei Zhao, Wei Zhang, Meili Zhang, Hua Song, Nicole Briceno, Dionne Davis, Masashi Watanabe, Mark Richard Gilbert, Masaki Terabe
Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) prognosis remains poor, and although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have transformed the treatment of many tumors, they are ineffective in GBM. However, response to ICIs occurs in high-tumor-mutational-burden (TMB) GBMs. To address the immunological impact of high TMB in GBM, we created a high TMB syngeneic mouse model from the low TMB SB28 GBM cell line.
Methods: We used CRISPR-Cas9 to target murine Msh2, Mlh1, CXCL10, and CCL5. Single-cell-sorted clones were characterized by whole exome, bulk RNA-sequencing, and neoantigen prediction. Clones were injected subcutaneously or intracranially with or without anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA4 and dexamethasone.
Results: Loss of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins Msh2 or Mlh1 increased nonsynonymous mutations. A fraction of mice with intracranial Msh2KO but not Mlh1KO SB28 showed long-term survival with anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA4 treatment plus dexamethasone. Long-term surviving mice from Msh2 KO SB28 rejected rechallenged subcutaneous tumors. Subcutaneous tumors from clones with increased TMB grew more slowly. This was fully abrogated in Rag1 null mice for Msh2KO but only partially for Mlh1KO SB28. Hypermutant Msh2KO clones spontaneously secreted CXCL10, CCL5, and increased pro-inflammatory chemokines after IFN-γ stimulation. Knockout of CXCL10 or CCL5 in the highest TMB Msh2KO clone restored flank tumor growth, indicating loss of immune response despite elevated TMB.
Conclusion: Mismatch repair-deficient SB28 tumors were more immunogenic, but this was not completely correlated with TMB. Rather, rejection depended on increased secretion of pro-inflammatory chemokines. Msh2 and Mlh1 loss was not equivalent, suggesting that additional studies are needed to elucidate germline and somatic mismatch repair gene-specific immune alterations.
背景:胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)的预后仍然很差,尽管免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)已经改变了许多肿瘤的治疗方法,但它们对GBM无效。然而,对ICIs的反应发生在高肿瘤突变负荷(TMB) GBMs中。为了解决高TMB对GBM的免疫影响,我们用低TMB的SB28 GBM细胞系建立了高TMB的同基因小鼠模型。方法:我们使用CRISPR-Cas9靶向小鼠Msh2、Mlh1、CXCL10和CCL5。单细胞分选克隆的特点是全外显子组,散装rna测序和新抗原预测。克隆分别皮下或颅内注射或不注射抗pd -1/抗ctla4和地塞米松。结果:失配修复(MMR)蛋白Msh2或Mlh1的缺失增加了非同义突变。在抗pd -1/抗ctla4联合地塞米松治疗下,一小部分颅内Msh2KO而非Mlh1KO SB28小鼠表现出长期生存。长期存活的Msh2 KO SB28小鼠对皮下肿瘤的再挑战产生排斥反应。TMB增加的克隆的皮下肿瘤生长更慢。在Rag1缺失的Msh2KO小鼠中,这一现象完全消失,但在Mlh1KO SB28小鼠中,这一现象仅部分消失。高突变Msh2KO克隆在IFN-γ刺激后自发分泌CXCL10、CCL5,并增加促炎趋化因子。在TMB最高的Msh2KO克隆中敲除CXCL10或CCL5恢复了侧腹肿瘤的生长,表明尽管TMB升高,但免疫应答丧失。结论:错配修复缺陷的SB28肿瘤具有更强的免疫原性,但这与TMB并不完全相关。相反,排斥反应依赖于促炎趋化因子分泌的增加。Msh2和Mlh1的缺失是不相等的,这表明需要更多的研究来阐明种系和体细胞错配修复基因特异性免疫改变。
{"title":"Increased immunogenicity of hypermutated SB28 syngeneic glioblastoma is partially mediated by alterations in tumor chemokine expression.","authors":"Kevin Thomas Breen, Tuesday Haynes, Matthew Bryce Watowich, Seketoulie Keretsu, Aiguo Li, Yongmei Zhao, Wei Zhang, Meili Zhang, Hua Song, Nicole Briceno, Dionne Davis, Masashi Watanabe, Mark Richard Gilbert, Masaki Terabe","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf249","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf249","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glioblastoma (GBM) prognosis remains poor, and although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have transformed the treatment of many tumors, they are ineffective in GBM. However, response to ICIs occurs in high-tumor-mutational-burden (TMB) GBMs. To address the immunological impact of high TMB in GBM, we created a high TMB syngeneic mouse model from the low TMB SB28 GBM cell line.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used CRISPR-Cas9 to target murine <i>Msh2</i>, <i>Mlh1, CXCL10</i>, and <i>CCL5</i>. Single-cell-sorted clones were characterized by whole exome, bulk RNA-sequencing, and neoantigen prediction. Clones were injected subcutaneously or intracranially with or without anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA4 and dexamethasone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Loss of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins Msh2 or Mlh1 increased nonsynonymous mutations. A fraction of mice with intracranial <i>Msh2</i>KO but not <i>Mlh1</i>KO SB28 showed long-term survival with anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA4 treatment plus dexamethasone. Long-term surviving mice from <i>Msh2</i> KO SB28 rejected rechallenged subcutaneous tumors. Subcutaneous tumors from clones with increased TMB grew more slowly. This was fully abrogated in <i>Rag1</i> null mice for <i>Msh2</i>KO but only partially for <i>Mlh1</i>KO SB28. Hypermutant <i>Msh2</i>KO clones spontaneously secreted CXCL10, CCL5, and increased pro-inflammatory chemokines after IFN-γ stimulation. Knockout of <i>CXCL10</i> or <i>CCL5</i> in the highest TMB <i>Msh2</i>KO clone restored flank tumor growth, indicating loss of immune response despite elevated TMB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mismatch repair-deficient SB28 tumors were more immunogenic, but this was not completely correlated with TMB. Rather, rejection depended on increased secretion of pro-inflammatory chemokines. <i>Msh2</i> and <i>Mlh1</i> loss was not equivalent, suggesting that additional studies are needed to elucidate germline and somatic mismatch repair gene-specific immune alterations.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"7 1","pages":"vdaf249"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12859701/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146109259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}