首页 > 最新文献

Neuro-oncology advances最新文献

英文 中文
Combined inhibition of lysine-specific demethylase 1 and kinase signaling as a preclinical treatment strategy in glioblastoma. 联合抑制赖氨酸特异性去甲基酶1和激酶信号作为胶质母细胞瘤的临床前治疗策略。
IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf246
Lea M Stitzlein, Deokhwa Nam, Faith A Hernandez, Kareena H Patel, Alaina Poche, Huaxian Ma, Katie Impelman, Joy Gumin, Heping Wang, Jing Wang, Samantha Gadd, Wafik Zaky, Oren Becher, Richard W Dudley, Frederick F Lang, Gangadhara R Sareddy, Joya Chandra

Background: Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is overexpressed in glioblastoma, contributing to tumor growth and treatment resistance. LSD1 inhibitors have shown preclinical promise but have had limited clinical development for glioblastoma. Given the frequent kinase pathway alterations seen in glioblastoma, the interplay between LSD1 inhibition and kinase signaling pathways was investigated.

Methods: Glioblastoma stem cell (GSC) lines and normal human astrocytes (NHAs) were treated with catalytic LSD1 inhibitors, NCD38 and bomedemstat, and the LSD1 scaffolding inhibitor, seclidemstat alone and in combination with kinase inhibitors, including osimertinib, afatinib, and ulixertinib. The effect on cell viability, proliferation, and neurosphere formation was assessed, and synergy scores were calculated using Bliss synergy models. Kinase signaling was analyzed and in vivo efficacy was evaluated in orthotopic xenograft models.

Results: LSD1 knockdown and seclidemstat reduced kinase signaling, while catalytic LSD1 inhibitors increased kinase activity or had no effect. Catalytic LSD1 inhibitors combined with kinase inhibitors, synergistically reduced GSC viability and proliferation while sparing NHAs. Combination treatment consistently reduced phospho-S6 ribosomal protein levels in three different GSC lines, and basal phospho-S6 ribosomal protein levels across the GSCs and the NHAs were negatively correlated with a synergistic response. The generation of an NCD38-resistant GSC showed increased kinase activity and was associated with enhanced osimertinib sensitivity. Combined treatment with NCD38 and osimertinib in glioblastoma-bearing mice delayed tumor growth and improved survival outcomes.

Discussion: These findings provide a rationale for further investigation of combination therapies of catalytic inhibitors of LSD1 and EGFR and dual-targeted inhibitors to overcome resistance and improve outcomes.

背景:赖氨酸特异性去甲基酶1 (LSD1)在胶质母细胞瘤中过表达,参与肿瘤生长和治疗抵抗。LSD1抑制剂已显示出临床前的希望,但对胶质母细胞瘤的临床开发有限。鉴于胶质母细胞瘤中常见的激酶通路改变,我们研究了LSD1抑制与激酶信号通路之间的相互作用。方法:用LSD1催化抑制剂NCD38、homedemstat、LSD1支架抑制剂seclidemstat单独或与激酶抑制剂(包括奥希替尼、阿法替尼和乌利西替尼)联合治疗胶质母细胞瘤干细胞(GSC)系和正常人星形细胞(NHAs)。评估对细胞活力、增殖和神经球形成的影响,并使用Bliss协同模型计算协同评分。在原位异种移植物模型中分析了激酶信号传导并评估了体内疗效。结果:LSD1敲低和seclidemstat降低了激酶信号传导,而催化LSD1抑制剂增加了激酶活性或没有作用。催化LSD1抑制剂与激酶抑制剂联合,协同降低GSC活力和增殖,同时保留NHAs。联合治疗持续降低了三种不同GSC系的磷酸化- s6核糖体蛋白水平,并且GSC和NHAs的基础磷酸化- s6核糖体蛋白水平与协同反应呈负相关。耐ncd38的GSC的产生显示出激酶活性增加,并与增强的奥希替尼敏感性相关。NCD38和奥西替尼联合治疗胶质母细胞瘤小鼠延迟肿瘤生长并改善生存结果。讨论:这些发现为进一步研究LSD1和EGFR催化抑制剂和双靶向抑制剂联合治疗以克服耐药和改善预后提供了理论依据。
{"title":"Combined inhibition of lysine-specific demethylase 1 and kinase signaling as a preclinical treatment strategy in glioblastoma.","authors":"Lea M Stitzlein, Deokhwa Nam, Faith A Hernandez, Kareena H Patel, Alaina Poche, Huaxian Ma, Katie Impelman, Joy Gumin, Heping Wang, Jing Wang, Samantha Gadd, Wafik Zaky, Oren Becher, Richard W Dudley, Frederick F Lang, Gangadhara R Sareddy, Joya Chandra","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf246","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf246","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is overexpressed in glioblastoma, contributing to tumor growth and treatment resistance. LSD1 inhibitors have shown preclinical promise but have had limited clinical development for glioblastoma. Given the frequent kinase pathway alterations seen in glioblastoma, the interplay between LSD1 inhibition and kinase signaling pathways was investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Glioblastoma stem cell (GSC) lines and normal human astrocytes (NHAs) were treated with catalytic LSD1 inhibitors, NCD38 and bomedemstat, and the LSD1 scaffolding inhibitor, seclidemstat alone and in combination with kinase inhibitors, including osimertinib, afatinib, and ulixertinib. The effect on cell viability, proliferation, and neurosphere formation was assessed, and synergy scores were calculated using Bliss synergy models. Kinase signaling was analyzed and <i>in vivo</i> efficacy was evaluated in orthotopic xenograft models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LSD1 knockdown and seclidemstat reduced kinase signaling, while catalytic LSD1 inhibitors increased kinase activity or had no effect. Catalytic LSD1 inhibitors combined with kinase inhibitors, synergistically reduced GSC viability and proliferation while sparing NHAs. Combination treatment consistently reduced phospho-S6 ribosomal protein levels in three different GSC lines, and basal phospho-S6 ribosomal protein levels across the GSCs and the NHAs were negatively correlated with a synergistic response. The generation of an NCD38-resistant GSC showed increased kinase activity and was associated with enhanced osimertinib sensitivity. Combined treatment with NCD38 and osimertinib in glioblastoma-bearing mice delayed tumor growth and improved survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings provide a rationale for further investigation of combination therapies of catalytic inhibitors of LSD1 and EGFR and dual-targeted inhibitors to overcome resistance and improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"7 1","pages":"vdaf246"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12768500/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145914326","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of postoperative ischemic changes on survival outcomes in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. idh野生型胶质母细胞瘤术后缺血改变对生存结果的影响。
IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-20 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf235
Neslihan Nisa Gecici, Ahmed Habib, Walaa Hamza, Allyson Andrews, Rivka R Colen, Sameer Agnihotri, Pascal O Zinn

Abstract: BackgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumor. The authors of this study wanted to find out whether areas of reduced blood flow, called ischemia, that appear after surgery affect how long people live with this disease. To do this, they reviewed scans from 451 patients taken within three days after tumor removal and measured the size of any new areas with poor blood supply. Their results showed that larger areas of ischemia were linked to shorter survival. The prognostic relevance of postoperative ischemia in GBM remains unclear. This study investigated the association between infarct volume and survival in patients with Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype GBM.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 451 patients with IDH-wildtype GBM who underwent resection between 2013 and 2024 and had diffusion-weighted imaging within 72 h postoperatively. Ischemic changes were defined as new areas of diffusion restriction and stratified into none/rim-only, small (<5 cm³), and large (≥5 cm³) infarcts. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models adjusted for age, preoperative KPS, tumor size, extent of resection, MGMT status, adjuvant therapy, and postoperative deficits.

Results: Large infarcts were associated with shorter median PFS (7.0 months [95% CI: 5-9]) and OS (14.0 months [95% CI: 9-18]) compared to small infarcts and none/rim-only (PFS: P = .07; OS: P = .001). In multivariable models, infarct volume was independently associated with reduced OS (per cubic centimeter increase, HR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.032; P = .003), while its association with PFS did not reach statistical significance (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.0-1.02; P = .13). When modeled categorically, large infarcts remained predictive of shorter PFS (HR = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.01-1.9; P = .04) and OS (HR = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2-2.4; P = .001).

Conclusions: Infarct volume is independently associated with survival in IDH-wildtype GBM. These findings highlight the clinical relevance of postoperative ischemia and may point toward ischemia-related mechanisms as targets for future therapeutic investigation.

摘要:背景胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)是一种侵袭性脑肿瘤。这项研究的作者想要找出手术后出现的血流量减少的区域,即缺血,是否会影响患者的寿命。为了做到这一点,他们回顾了451名患者在肿瘤切除后三天内的扫描结果,并测量了血液供应不足的新区域的大小。他们的研究结果表明,大面积缺血与较短的生存期有关。GBM术后缺血与预后的相关性尚不清楚。本研究调查了异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)野生型GBM患者梗死面积与生存率之间的关系。方法:我们回顾性分析了451例2013年至2024年间接受切除术并在术后72小时内进行弥散加权成像的idh -野生型GBM患者。缺血改变被定义为新的扩散限制区域,并分为无/仅环、小(结果:与小梗死和无/仅环相比,大梗死与较短的中位PFS(7.0个月[95% CI: 5-9])和OS(14.0个月[95% CI: 9-18])相关(PFS: P = .07;OS: P = .001)。在多变量模型中,梗死体积与每立方厘米增加的OS降低独立相关,HR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.032; P = 。003),而与PFS的相关性无统计学意义(HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.0-1.02; P = .13)。当进行分类建模时,大面积梗死仍然预示着较短的PFS (HR = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.01-1.9; P =。04)和OS (HR = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2-2.4; P = 0.001)。结论:idh野生型GBM的梗死面积与生存独立相关。这些发现强调了术后缺血的临床相关性,并可能指出缺血相关机制作为未来治疗研究的目标。
{"title":"The impact of postoperative ischemic changes on survival outcomes in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma.","authors":"Neslihan Nisa Gecici, Ahmed Habib, Walaa Hamza, Allyson Andrews, Rivka R Colen, Sameer Agnihotri, Pascal O Zinn","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf235","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf235","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BackgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumor. The authors of this study wanted to find out whether areas of reduced blood flow, called ischemia, that appear after surgery affect how long people live with this disease. To do this, they reviewed scans from 451 patients taken within three days after tumor removal and measured the size of any new areas with poor blood supply. Their results showed that larger areas of ischemia were linked to shorter survival. The prognostic relevance of postoperative ischemia in GBM remains unclear. This study investigated the association between infarct volume and survival in patients with Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype GBM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 451 patients with IDH-wildtype GBM who underwent resection between 2013 and 2024 and had diffusion-weighted imaging within 72 h postoperatively. Ischemic changes were defined as new areas of diffusion restriction and stratified into none/rim-only, small (<5 cm³), and large (≥5 cm³) infarcts. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models adjusted for age, preoperative KPS, tumor size, extent of resection, MGMT status, adjuvant therapy, and postoperative deficits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Large infarcts were associated with shorter median PFS (7.0 months [95% CI: 5-9]) and OS (14.0 months [95% CI: 9-18]) compared to small infarcts and none/rim-only (PFS: <i>P</i> = .07; OS: <i>P</i> = .001). In multivariable models, infarct volume was independently associated with reduced OS (per cubic centimeter increase, HR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.032; <i>P</i> = .003), while its association with PFS did not reach statistical significance (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.0-1.02; <i>P</i> = .13). When modeled categorically, large infarcts remained predictive of shorter PFS (HR = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.01-1.9; <i>P</i> = .04) and OS (HR = 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2-2.4; <i>P</i> = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Infarct volume is independently associated with survival in IDH-wildtype GBM. These findings highlight the clinical relevance of postoperative ischemia and may point toward ischemia-related mechanisms as targets for future therapeutic investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"8 1","pages":"vdaf235"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12883208/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146151602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of systemic therapy after stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with limited brain-only metastasis. 立体定向放射手术后全身治疗对局限脑转移患者的影响。
IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-20 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf214
Jamiluddin J Qazi, Amanda E D Van Swearingen, David J Carpenter, Gloria Broadwater, Jim X Leng, Muzamil Arshad, Steven J Chmura, Rani Bansal, Laura Alder, Peter E Fecci, John P Kirkpatrick, Joseph K Salama, Trey C Mullikin, Scott R Floyd, Carey K Anders

Background: The impact of systemic therapy (ST) on outcomes for patients with brain-only metastases (BrM) in the absence of extracranial disease (ECD) is not well established. We compared outcomes between patients with BrM treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) who received ST ≤3 months (mos), >3 mos, or not at all after SRS.

Methods: We identified BrM patients who completed SRS across two institutions from 1/2015 to 12/2020. Intracranial progression after SRS was determined by brain MRI radiographic recurrence. Overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression free survival (iPFS) estimates were also generated.

Results: In total, 342 patients with BrM were identified. Primary sites included lung (73%), breast (12%), and additional sites (15%). Almost half, 169 (49%), received no ST, 80 (23%) received ST ≤3 mos, and 93 (27%) received ST >3 mos after SRS. Median age was younger in the ST >3 mos cohort (60.5years) compared with ST <3mo (67.7years) and no ST (67.0years), P = .0002. Median OS differed significantly between groups: ST ≤3 mos with 24.9mos (95%CI: 16.6-51.1), ST >3 mos with 27.5mos (95% CI: 20.6-37.5), and no ST with 11.0mos (95%CI: 9-17.5), P = .002. Median iPFS differed significantly between groups: ST ≤3 mos 16.1mos (95% CI: 9.5-33.7), ST >3 mos 8.9mos (95% CI: 6.9-13.5), and no ST 10.0mos (95% CI: 6.7- 15.1). However, timing of ST was not significant multivariate analysis.

Conclusions: In our cohort of BrM patients, ST after SRS improves OS regardless of timing. ST ≤3 mos may improve iPFS compared with ST >3 mos after SRS, which warrants further investigation. Appropriate patients with BrM should be referred for a multi-disciplinary discussion of ST following SRS.

背景:在无颅外疾病(ECD)的情况下,全身治疗(ST)对脑转移(BrM)患者预后的影响尚未得到很好的证实。我们比较了接受立体定向放射手术(SRS)治疗的BrM患者的结果,这些患者在SRS后接受ST≤3个月(mos), bb0 3个月,或根本不接受。方法:选取2015年1月至2020年12月在两家机构完成SRS的BrM患者。SRS后的颅内进展通过脑MRI影像学复发来确定。总生存期(OS)和颅内无进展生存期(iPFS)估计也被生成。结果:共鉴定出342例BrM患者。原发部位包括肺(73%)、乳腺(12%)和其他部位(15%)。几乎一半的169例(49%)患者没有接受ST治疗,80例(23%)患者接受ST≤3个月,93例(27%)患者在SRS后接受ST治疗。与ST组相比,ST组的中位年龄更年轻(60.5岁),P = 0.0002。组间中位OS差异显著:ST≤3个mos为24.9个mos (95%CI: 16.6 ~ 51.1), ST≤3个mos为27.5个mos (95%CI: 20.6 ~ 37.5), ST≤3个mos为11.0个mos (95%CI: 9 ~ 17.5), P = 0.002。各组间的中位iPFS差异显著:ST≤3个mos 16.1个mos (95% CI: 9.5-33.7), ST≤3个mos 8.9个mos (95% CI: 6.9-13.5), ST≤3个mos 10.0个mos (95% CI: 6.7- 15.1)。然而,ST时间的多变量分析无显著性。结论:在我们的BrM患者队列中,SRS后的ST改善了OS,与时间无关。与ST≤3 mos相比,ST≤3 mos可改善SRS后iPFS,值得进一步研究。适当的BrM患者应转诊进行SRS后ST的多学科讨论。
{"title":"Impact of systemic therapy after stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with limited brain-only metastasis.","authors":"Jamiluddin J Qazi, Amanda E D Van Swearingen, David J Carpenter, Gloria Broadwater, Jim X Leng, Muzamil Arshad, Steven J Chmura, Rani Bansal, Laura Alder, Peter E Fecci, John P Kirkpatrick, Joseph K Salama, Trey C Mullikin, Scott R Floyd, Carey K Anders","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf214","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf214","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of systemic therapy (ST) on outcomes for patients with brain-only metastases (BrM) in the absence of extracranial disease (ECD) is not well established. We compared outcomes between patients with BrM treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) who received ST ≤3 months (mos), >3 mos, or not at all after SRS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified BrM patients who completed SRS across two institutions from 1/2015 to 12/2020. Intracranial progression after SRS was determined by brain MRI radiographic recurrence. Overall survival (OS) and intracranial progression free survival (iPFS) estimates were also generated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 342 patients with BrM were identified. Primary sites included lung (73%), breast (12%), and additional sites (15%). Almost half, 169 (49%), received no ST, 80 (23%) received ST ≤3 mos, and 93 (27%) received ST >3 mos after SRS. Median age was younger in the ST >3 mos cohort (60.5years) compared with ST <3mo (67.7years) and no ST (67.0years), <i>P</i> = .0002. Median OS differed significantly between groups: ST ≤3 mos with 24.9mos (95%CI: 16.6-51.1), ST >3 mos with 27.5mos (95% CI: 20.6-37.5), and no ST with 11.0mos (95%CI: 9-17.5), <i>P</i> = .002. Median iPFS differed significantly between groups: ST ≤3 mos 16.1mos (95% CI: 9.5-33.7), ST >3 mos 8.9mos (95% CI: 6.9-13.5), and no ST 10.0mos (95% CI: 6.7- 15.1). However, timing of ST was not significant multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our cohort of BrM patients, ST after SRS improves OS regardless of timing. ST ≤3 mos may improve iPFS compared with ST >3 mos after SRS, which warrants further investigation. Appropriate patients with BrM should be referred for a multi-disciplinary discussion of ST following SRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"7 1","pages":"vdaf214"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12768501/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145914328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A case of radiation treatment effect mimicking viable, recurrent meningioma on DOTATATE PET imaging. 放射治疗效果模拟活的复发性脑膜瘤病例。
IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-20 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf244
Brooke C Braman, Kanish Mirchia, Javier E Villanueva-Meyer, David R Raleigh
{"title":"A case of radiation treatment effect mimicking viable, recurrent meningioma on DOTATATE PET imaging.","authors":"Brooke C Braman, Kanish Mirchia, Javier E Villanueva-Meyer, David R Raleigh","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf244","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf244","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"8 1","pages":"vdaf244"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12850528/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146088588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Brain metastasis patient-derived xenograft models to characterize the contribution of brain microenvironment to metastatic outgrowth. 脑转移患者来源的异种移植模型表征脑微环境对转移生长的贡献。
IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf239
Maria Cecília Oliveira-Nunes, Weili Ma, Chenyu Mao, Brian S Huo, Angela Rios Angulo, Gianfranco Landa Bianchi, Pulak Ray, Qing Chen

Background: Brain metastasis is the most ominous form of cancer relapse. There is urgent need to develop preclinical mouse models to study brain metastasis and new therapeutic strategies. Patient derived xenograft (PDX) models are clinically relevant mouse models. The brain stromal cells play critical roles on metastatic initiation and outgrowth. We have shown that PPARγ signaling in cancer cells is activated by astrocytes to increase brain metastatic outgrowth. Here, we aim to compare ectopic and orthotopic brain metastasis PDX models to address whether the unique brain microenvironment affects therapeutic efficacy of PPARγ antagonist.

Methods: A collection of surgically resected brain metastasis tissues from cancer patients were used to generate PDX models. Ectopic and orthotopic brain metastasis PDX models were generated and characterized. The tumor growth was tracked in both PDX models when treated with PPARγ antagonist.

Results: The growth rate of PDX tumors increased over passages in our ectopic PDX models and maintains in the orthotopic PDX models. Brain stromal cells were absent in the ectopic PDX tumors. Brain metastasis cancer cells sustained the PPARγ expression in both ectopic and orthotopic PDX tumors, at the similar level as the original brain metastasis tissues. However, PPARγ antagonist only decreased tumor growth in the brain without affecting subcutaneous tumors.

Conclusions: Our results show that PDX models are successfully generated from clinical brain metastasis tissues and maintain the molecular characteristics in the brain metastasis cancer cells. Moreover, our study indicates the importance of the brain microenvironment to the therapeutic response in brain metastasis.

背景:脑转移是癌症复发的最不祥的形式。迫切需要建立临床前小鼠模型来研究脑转移和新的治疗策略。患者源性异种移植(PDX)模型是临床相关的小鼠模型。脑基质细胞在转移的发生和发展中起着至关重要的作用。我们已经证明,癌细胞中的PPARγ信号被星形胶质细胞激活,从而增加脑转移性生长。在这里,我们的目的是比较异位和正位脑转移PDX模型,以解决独特的脑微环境是否影响PPARγ拮抗剂的治疗效果。方法:收集手术切除的肿瘤患者脑转移组织,建立PDX模型。建立异位和正位脑转移PDX模型并进行表征。在两种PDX模型中,当使用PPARγ拮抗剂治疗时,肿瘤生长被跟踪。结果:在异位PDX模型中,肿瘤的生长速度随着传代的增加而增加,而在正位PDX模型中则保持不变。异位PDX肿瘤中未见脑间质细胞。脑转移癌细胞在异位和正位PDX肿瘤中均维持PPARγ的表达,表达水平与原始脑转移组织相似。然而,PPARγ拮抗剂仅能抑制脑内肿瘤的生长,而不影响皮下肿瘤。结论:我们的研究结果表明PDX模型成功地从临床脑转移组织中生成,并保持了脑转移癌细胞的分子特征。此外,我们的研究表明脑微环境对脑转移的治疗反应的重要性。
{"title":"Brain metastasis patient-derived xenograft models to characterize the contribution of brain microenvironment to metastatic outgrowth.","authors":"Maria Cecília Oliveira-Nunes, Weili Ma, Chenyu Mao, Brian S Huo, Angela Rios Angulo, Gianfranco Landa Bianchi, Pulak Ray, Qing Chen","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf239","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf239","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brain metastasis is the most ominous form of cancer relapse. There is urgent need to develop preclinical mouse models to study brain metastasis and new therapeutic strategies. Patient derived xenograft <b>(</b>PDX) models are clinically relevant mouse models. The brain stromal cells play critical roles on metastatic initiation and outgrowth. We have shown that PPARγ signaling in cancer cells is activated by astrocytes to increase brain metastatic outgrowth. Here, we aim to compare ectopic and orthotopic brain metastasis PDX models to address whether the unique brain microenvironment affects therapeutic efficacy of PPARγ antagonist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A collection of surgically resected brain metastasis tissues from cancer patients were used to generate PDX models. Ectopic and orthotopic brain metastasis PDX models were generated and characterized. The tumor growth was tracked in both PDX models when treated with PPARγ antagonist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The growth rate of PDX tumors increased over passages in our ectopic PDX models and maintains in the orthotopic PDX models. Brain stromal cells were absent in the ectopic PDX tumors. Brain metastasis cancer cells sustained the PPARγ expression in both ectopic and orthotopic PDX tumors, at the similar level as the original brain metastasis tissues. However, PPARγ antagonist only decreased tumor growth in the brain without affecting subcutaneous tumors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results show that PDX models are successfully generated from clinical brain metastasis tissues and maintain the molecular characteristics in the brain metastasis cancer cells. Moreover, our study indicates the importance of the brain microenvironment to the therapeutic response in brain metastasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"7 1","pages":"vdaf239"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12768502/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145914286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Fusion transcriptome landscape in glioblastoma: Incidence and therapeutic implications. 胶质母细胞瘤的融合转录组景观:发病率和治疗意义。
IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-13 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf238
Sonikpreet Aulakh, Joanne Xiu, Shawn Kothari, Soma Sengupta, Negar Sadeghipour, Michael Glantz, Manmeet S Ahluwalia, Theodore Nicolaides, Mark R Gilbert

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) lacks effective therapies for recurrent disease. Unlike cancers with successful fusion-targeted treatments (eg BCR-ABL1 in CML), the incidence and therapeutic potential of gene fusions in GBM remain unclear. We analyzed a large genomic database to define fusion frequency and molecular associations.

Methods: 4800 IDH-wildtype GBM samples (WHO 2021) underwent NextGen DNA sequencing (592-gene panel/whole exome) and Whole Transcriptome Sequencing for fusions at Caris Life Sciences. Fisher-Exact/Chi-Square tests, adjusted by Benjamini-Hochberg (q < 0.05), assessed significance.

Results: Pathogenic fusions occurred in 428 (8.9%) samples, primarily FGFR3 (37%, n = 159; FGFR3: TACC3, n = 134), MET (21%, n = 92), and EGFR (20%, n = 87). Pathogenic or likely pathogenic fusions included NTRK2 (n = 27), PDGFRA (n = 23), ROS1 (n = 14), and BRAF (n = 10). Fusion-positive tumors had higher MET (7.5% vs. 0.7%), FGFR3 (5% vs. 0.2%), CDK4 (17% vs. 11%), and MDM2 (12% vs. 7.5%) amplifications, but lower EGFR mutations (6.1% vs. 18%), amplifications (6.1% vs. 18%), and EGFRvIII (11.9% vs. 22.5%) (all q < 0.05). Median survival was 16.6 months (fusion-positive) vs. 15.5 months (fusion-negative) (P = 0.043). Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-treated fusion-positive patients (n = 37) showed no significant survival benefit (18.4 vs. 16.5 months, P = .971).

Conclusions: Approximately 9% of GBMs harbor targetable fusions, with five genes (FGFR3, MET, EGFR, NTRK2, PDGFRA) comprising 8%. These findings support multi-arm clinical trials to evaluate targeted therapies, potentially improving outcomes for molecularly defined GBM subgroups.

背景:胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)缺乏有效的治疗复发性疾病。与成功融合靶向治疗的癌症(如CML中的BCR-ABL1)不同,基因融合在GBM中的发病率和治疗潜力尚不清楚。我们分析了一个大型基因组数据库来定义融合频率和分子关联。方法:4800份idh野生型GBM样本(WHO 2021)在Caris生命科学公司进行NextGen DNA测序(592个基因组/全外显子组)和全转录组测序进行融合。结果:致病性融合发生在428例(8.9%)样本中,主要是FGFR3 (37%, n = 159; FGFR3: TACC3, n = 134), MET (21%, n = 92)和EGFR (20%, n = 87)。致病性或可能致病性融合包括NTRK2 (n = 27)、PDGFRA (n = 23)、ROS1 (n = 14)和BRAF (n = 10)。融合阳性肿瘤具有较高的MET(7.5%比0.7%)、FGFR3(5%比0.2%)、CDK4(17%比11%)和MDM2(12%比7.5%)扩增,但较低的EGFR突变(6.1%比18%)、扩增(6.1%比18%)和EGFRvIII(11.9%比22.5%)(所有q P = 0.043)。酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)治疗的融合阳性患者(n = 37)没有显著的生存获益(18.4个月vs 16.5个月,P = .971)。结论:大约9%的GBMs含有靶向融合,其中5个基因(FGFR3、MET、EGFR、NTRK2、PDGFRA)占8%。这些发现支持多组临床试验来评估靶向治疗,可能改善分子定义的GBM亚组的预后。
{"title":"Fusion transcriptome landscape in glioblastoma: Incidence and therapeutic implications.","authors":"Sonikpreet Aulakh, Joanne Xiu, Shawn Kothari, Soma Sengupta, Negar Sadeghipour, Michael Glantz, Manmeet S Ahluwalia, Theodore Nicolaides, Mark R Gilbert","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf238","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf238","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glioblastoma (GBM) lacks effective therapies for recurrent disease. Unlike cancers with successful fusion-targeted treatments (eg <i>BCR</i>-<i>ABL1</i> in CML), the incidence and therapeutic potential of gene fusions in GBM remain unclear. We analyzed a large genomic database to define fusion frequency and molecular associations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>4800 <i>IDH</i>-wildtype GBM samples (WHO 2021) underwent NextGen DNA sequencing (592-gene panel/whole exome) and Whole Transcriptome Sequencing for fusions at Caris Life Sciences. Fisher-Exact/Chi-Square tests, adjusted by Benjamini-Hochberg (q < 0.05), assessed significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pathogenic fusions occurred in 428 (8.9%) samples, primarily <i>FGFR3</i> (37%, <i>n</i> = 159; <i>FGFR3: TACC3</i>, <i>n</i> = 134), <i>MET</i> (21%, <i>n</i> = 92), and <i>EGFR</i> (20%, <i>n</i> = 87). Pathogenic or likely pathogenic fusions included <i>NTRK2</i> (<i>n</i> = 27), <i>PDGFRA</i> (<i>n</i> = 23), <i>ROS1</i> (<i>n</i> = 14), and <i>BRAF</i> (<i>n</i> = 10). Fusion-positive tumors had higher <i>MET</i> (7.5% vs. 0.7%), <i>FGFR3</i> (5% vs. 0.2%), <i>CDK4</i> (17% vs. 11%), and <i>MDM2</i> (12% vs. 7.5%) amplifications, but lower <i>EGFR</i> mutations (6.1% vs. 18%), amplifications (6.1% vs. 18%), and <i>EGFRvIII</i> (11.9% vs. 22.5%) (all q < 0.05). Median survival was 16.6 months (fusion-positive) vs. 15.5 months (fusion-negative) (<i>P</i> = 0.043). Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-treated fusion-positive patients (<i>n</i> = 37) showed no significant survival benefit (18.4 vs. 16.5 months, <i>P</i> = .971).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Approximately 9% of GBMs harbor targetable fusions, with five genes (<i>FGFR3</i>, <i>MET</i>, <i>EGFR</i>, NTRK2, <i>PDGFRA</i>) comprising 8%. These findings support multi-arm clinical trials to evaluate targeted therapies, potentially improving outcomes for molecularly defined GBM subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"8 1","pages":"vdaf238"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12831933/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146055670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preclinical assessment of checkpoint blockade combined with DNA methyltransferase inhibition in high-risk pediatric brain tumors reveals limited therapeutic synergy. 检查点阻断联合DNA甲基转移酶抑制在高危儿童脑肿瘤中的临床前评估显示,治疗协同作用有限。
IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-13 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf241
Deepak Kumar Mishra, Shelli M Morris, Dean Popovski, Emily J Girard, Andrew Bondoc, Shiva Senthil Kumar, Augusto Faria Andrade, Xiaoting Zhu, Fupan Yao, Mi-Youn Brusniak, Banlanjo Umaru, Erin E Crotty, Ken Brasel, Fiona Pakiam, Caterina Russo, Michele Zeinieh, Matt C Biery, Margo Coxon, Heather Conti, Midori Clarke, Mei Lu, James Rutka, Dhana Llivichuzhca-Loja, Liza Konnikova, Maryam Fouladi, Nada Jabado, Annie Huang, James M Olson, Rachid Drissi

Abstract: BackgroundDespite intensive therapies, outcomes for high-risk pediatric brain tumors (PBTs) remain dismal, prompting the search for novel treatments. DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi) have been shown to prime tumors to improve response to checkpoint inhibition. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of decitabine (DAC), in combination with a PD-1 inhibitor, to improve survival in pediatric high-risk brain tumor models.

Methods: Analysis of human PBT datasets was performed to determine gene expression levels of immune cell markers. Tumor response to DAC, with or without a PD-1 inhibitor, was tested in murine models representing H3-wildtype diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), H3K27-mutant diffuse midline glioma (DMG), atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT), and medulloblastoma (MB). CyTOF analysis of allograft tumors was performed to characterize changes within the tumor microenvironment.

Results: Analysis of PBT subtypes revealed heterogeneous expression of immune cell markers, checkpoint receptors, and MHC molecules. DAC treatment decreased DNA methylation and increased neoantigen expression in human and mouse tumor cells. DAC treatment resulted in prolonged survival in syngeneic mouse models of DIPG and ATRT but not DMG and MB models. However, no added survival benefit was observed when combined with a PD-1 inhibitor. CyTOF analysis of mouse tumors revealed changes in local immune cell infiltration.

Conclusions: DAC alone or in combination with a checkpoint inhibitor can alter the immune microenvironment in mouse tumor models. Changes were observed in H3-wildtype DIPG and ATRT models, suggesting that certain tumor subtypes may respond to immune priming with DNMTi.

背景:尽管进行了强化治疗,但高危儿童脑肿瘤(PBTs)的预后仍然令人沮丧,这促使人们寻找新的治疗方法。DNA甲基转移酶抑制剂(DNMTi)已被证明可以启动肿瘤以改善对检查点抑制的反应。本研究的目的是探讨地西他滨(DAC)联合PD-1抑制剂提高儿童高危脑肿瘤模型生存率的潜力。方法:分析人PBT数据集,确定免疫细胞标记物的基因表达水平。在h3 -野生型弥漫性固有脑桥胶质瘤(DIPG)、h3k27突变型弥漫性中线胶质瘤(DMG)、非典型畸胎瘤样横纹肌瘤(ATRT)和髓母细胞瘤(MB)的小鼠模型中,检测了肿瘤对DAC的反应,无论是否使用PD-1抑制剂。对同种异体移植肿瘤进行细胞of分析,以表征肿瘤微环境的变化。结果:PBT亚型分析显示免疫细胞标记物、检查点受体和MHC分子的异质表达。DAC治疗降低了人和小鼠肿瘤细胞的DNA甲基化,增加了新抗原的表达。DAC治疗可延长DIPG和ATRT的同基因小鼠模型的存活时间,但对DMG和MB模型没有影响。然而,当与PD-1抑制剂联合使用时,没有观察到额外的生存益处。小鼠肿瘤的CyTOF分析显示局部免疫细胞浸润的变化。结论:DAC单独或联合检查点抑制剂可改变小鼠肿瘤模型的免疫微环境。在h3 -野生型DIPG和ATRT模型中观察到变化,表明某些肿瘤亚型可能对DNMTi免疫启动有反应。
{"title":"Preclinical assessment of checkpoint blockade combined with DNA methyltransferase inhibition in high-risk pediatric brain tumors reveals limited therapeutic synergy.","authors":"Deepak Kumar Mishra, Shelli M Morris, Dean Popovski, Emily J Girard, Andrew Bondoc, Shiva Senthil Kumar, Augusto Faria Andrade, Xiaoting Zhu, Fupan Yao, Mi-Youn Brusniak, Banlanjo Umaru, Erin E Crotty, Ken Brasel, Fiona Pakiam, Caterina Russo, Michele Zeinieh, Matt C Biery, Margo Coxon, Heather Conti, Midori Clarke, Mei Lu, James Rutka, Dhana Llivichuzhca-Loja, Liza Konnikova, Maryam Fouladi, Nada Jabado, Annie Huang, James M Olson, Rachid Drissi","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf241","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf241","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BackgroundDespite intensive therapies, outcomes for high-risk pediatric brain tumors (PBTs) remain dismal, prompting the search for novel treatments. DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi) have been shown to prime tumors to improve response to checkpoint inhibition. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of decitabine (DAC), in combination with a PD-1 inhibitor, to improve survival in pediatric high-risk brain tumor models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analysis of human PBT datasets was performed to determine gene expression levels of immune cell markers. Tumor response to DAC, with or without a PD-1 inhibitor, was tested in murine models representing H3-wildtype diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), H3K27-mutant diffuse midline glioma (DMG), atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT), and medulloblastoma (MB). CyTOF analysis of allograft tumors was performed to characterize changes within the tumor microenvironment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of PBT subtypes revealed heterogeneous expression of immune cell markers, checkpoint receptors, and MHC molecules. DAC treatment decreased DNA methylation and increased neoantigen expression in human and mouse tumor cells. DAC treatment resulted in prolonged survival in syngeneic mouse models of DIPG and ATRT but not DMG and MB models. However, no added survival benefit was observed when combined with a PD-1 inhibitor. CyTOF analysis of mouse tumors revealed changes in local immune cell infiltration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DAC alone or in combination with a checkpoint inhibitor can alter the immune microenvironment in mouse tumor models. Changes were observed in H3-wildtype DIPG and ATRT models, suggesting that certain tumor subtypes may respond to immune priming with DNMTi.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"8 1","pages":"vdaf241"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12803780/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145992539","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Seizure outcomes as an understudied metric in glioma clinical trials: A review of the ClinicalTrials.gov database. 在神经胶质瘤临床试验中,癫痫发作结局作为一个未充分研究的指标:对ClinicalTrials.gov数据库的回顾。
IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-12 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf237
Hannah Haile, Nathan A Shlobin, Arjun R Adapa, Sandra Leskinen, Peter Canoll, Catherine Schevon, Guy M McKhann, Brian J A Gill

Abstract: BackgroundSeizures are a common and disabling symptom of adult-type diffuse gliomas, affecting quality of life and potentially influencing tumor progression. Despite their clinical significance, seizure outcomes are often underreported or heterogeneously measured in clinical trials.

Objective: To assess how seizure outcomes are reported in clinical trials for adult-type diffuse glioma.

Methods: We systematically reviewed glioma clinical trials initiated after January 1, 2010, through June 16, 2025, on ClinicalTrials.gov that included seizure-related outcomes. Each trial was manually screened to characterize how seizures were defined, measured, and categorized.

Results: Of 2,801 clinical trials identified, 65 (2.3%) included seizure-related outcomes. Among these, 20 designated seizures as a primary outcome, though many grouped them within broader safety endpoints. Seizures were often listed as secondary outcomes (n = 23), adverse events (n = 11), or within quality-of-life assessments (n = 8). Reporting was highly variable; many trials used binary metrics. As few as 9 trials systematically assessed seizures using International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) guidelines for seizure tracking (eg seizure diaries or structured EEG evaluation), and only 7 reported outcomes with standardized scales such as the ILAE outcome classification or the Engel classification, with rare use of newer tools such as the Seizure Control Composite Index.

Conclusions: Despite their clinical significance, seizure outcomes are rarely and heterogeneously reported in clinical trials for adult-type diffuse gliomas. Incorporating standardized, seizure-specific endpoints may better align glioma research with patient-centered and disease-specific outcomes.

摘要:癫痫发作是成人型弥漫性胶质瘤常见的致残症状,影响患者的生活质量,并可能影响肿瘤进展。尽管具有临床意义,但癫痫发作的结果在临床试验中往往被低估或测量不均匀。目的:评估成人型弥漫性胶质瘤临床试验中癫痫发作结果的报告。方法:我们系统地回顾了2010年1月1日至2025年6月16日在ClinicalTrials.gov上开展的胶质瘤临床试验,包括癫痫相关的结果。每个试验都是人工筛选的,以确定癫痫发作是如何定义、测量和分类的。结果:在2801项临床试验中,65项(2.3%)包括癫痫相关结果。其中,20例癫痫发作被指定为主要结果,尽管许多人将其归为更广泛的安全终点。癫痫发作通常被列为次要结局(n = 23)、不良事件(n = 11)或生活质量评估(n = 8)。报告变化很大;许多试验使用二元指标。只有9项试验使用国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)癫痫发作追踪指南(如癫痫发作日记或结构化脑电图评估)系统评估癫痫发作,只有7项试验报告了标准化量表(如ILAE结果分类或Engel分类)的结果,很少使用较新的工具(如癫痫发作控制综合指数)。结论:尽管具有临床意义,但在成人型弥漫性胶质瘤的临床试验中,癫痫发作的结果很少且不均匀。纳入标准化的、癫痫特异性的终点可以更好地将胶质瘤研究与以患者为中心和疾病特异性的结果结合起来。
{"title":"Seizure outcomes as an understudied metric in glioma clinical trials: A review of the ClinicalTrials.gov database.","authors":"Hannah Haile, Nathan A Shlobin, Arjun R Adapa, Sandra Leskinen, Peter Canoll, Catherine Schevon, Guy M McKhann, Brian J A Gill","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf237","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf237","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BackgroundSeizures are a common and disabling symptom of adult-type diffuse gliomas, affecting quality of life and potentially influencing tumor progression. Despite their clinical significance, seizure outcomes are often underreported or heterogeneously measured in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess how seizure outcomes are reported in clinical trials for adult-type diffuse glioma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically reviewed glioma clinical trials initiated after January 1, 2010, through June 16, 2025, on ClinicalTrials.gov that included seizure-related outcomes. Each trial was manually screened to characterize how seizures were defined, measured, and categorized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2,801 clinical trials identified, 65 (2.3%) included seizure-related outcomes. Among these, 20 designated seizures as a primary outcome, though many grouped them within broader safety endpoints. Seizures were often listed as secondary outcomes (<i>n</i> = 23), adverse events (<i>n</i> = 11), or within quality-of-life assessments (<i>n</i> = 8). Reporting was highly variable; many trials used binary metrics. As few as 9 trials systematically assessed seizures using International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) guidelines for seizure tracking (eg seizure diaries or structured EEG evaluation), and only 7 reported outcomes with standardized scales such as the ILAE outcome classification or the Engel classification, with rare use of newer tools such as the Seizure Control Composite Index.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite their clinical significance, seizure outcomes are rarely and heterogeneously reported in clinical trials for adult-type diffuse gliomas. Incorporating standardized, seizure-specific endpoints may better align glioma research with patient-centered and disease-specific outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"8 1","pages":"vdaf237"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12848232/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146088608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Desmoplastic infantile ganglioglioma/astrocytoma: Expanding the molecular and morphological spectrum with a novel BRAF fusion. 结缔组织增生婴儿神经节胶质瘤/星形细胞瘤:用一种新的BRAF融合扩大分子和形态谱。
IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-09 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf224
Ibrahim Kulac, Cisel Aydin Mericoz, Berrin Babaoglu, Figen Soylemezoglu

Background: Desmoplastic infantile ganglioglioma/astrocytoma (DIG/DIA) is a rare, low-grade tumor of infants. They are usually composed of a mixed astrocytic and neuronal component with desmoplastic stroma and embryonal-looking areas. Despite some recent reports, clinical, morphological and molecular features of DIG/DIAs are still not well characterized. Here, we present a series of 8 DIG/DIA cases.

Methods: Hacettepe University and Koc University Hospital, Departments of Pathology, databases were screened for DIG/DIA. Eight patients were identified. All the slides were reevaluated, and patients' clinical data were obtained. All cases were tested for BRAF V600 mutation and 3 BRAF V600 wild-type cases were sequenced.

Results: Median age at the diagnosis was 5.5 months (4-30 months). The female to male ratio was 6:2. Two cases recurred. Four cases showed BRAF p. V600 mutation. Of those BRAF p. V600 wild-type cases, one harbored TMEM106B::BRAF fusion, described for the first time in a DIG/DIA case.

Conclusions: DIG/DIA is a low-grade tumor seen in early childhood and characterized by an indolent clinical course. The most common molecular signature of these tumors is BRAF alterations, including rearrangements. The primary differential diagnosis is infant-type hemispheric glioma and given the similarities, pathologists must remain careful to ensure accurate diagnosis.

背景:婴儿神经胶质瘤/星形细胞瘤(DIG/DIA)是一种罕见的婴儿低级别肿瘤。它们通常由星形细胞和神经元成分混合组成,伴有结缔组织间质和胚胎样区域。尽管最近有一些报道,但DIG/DIAs的临床、形态学和分子特征仍未得到很好的表征。在这里,我们报告了8例DIG/DIA病例。方法:对Hacettepe大学和Koc大学附属医院病理科数据库进行DIG/DIA筛查。确定了8例患者。所有的切片重新评估,并获得患者的临床资料。对所有病例进行BRAF V600突变检测,并对3例BRAF V600野生型病例进行测序。结果:诊断时中位年龄为5.5个月(4-30个月)。男女比例为6:2。2例复发。4例出现BRAF p. V600突变。在这些BRAF p. V600野生型病例中,1例携带TMEM106B::BRAF融合,这是DIG/DIA病例中首次描述。结论:DIG/DIA是一种发生于儿童早期的低级别肿瘤,临床表现为惰性。这些肿瘤最常见的分子特征是BRAF改变,包括重排。主要鉴别诊断为婴儿型半球胶质瘤,鉴于其相似性,病理学家必须保持谨慎,以确保准确的诊断。
{"title":"Desmoplastic infantile ganglioglioma/astrocytoma: Expanding the molecular and morphological spectrum with a novel BRAF fusion.","authors":"Ibrahim Kulac, Cisel Aydin Mericoz, Berrin Babaoglu, Figen Soylemezoglu","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf224","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf224","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Desmoplastic infantile ganglioglioma/astrocytoma (DIG/DIA) is a rare, low-grade tumor of infants. They are usually composed of a mixed astrocytic and neuronal component with desmoplastic stroma and embryonal-looking areas. Despite some recent reports, clinical, morphological and molecular features of DIG/DIAs are still not well characterized. Here, we present a series of 8 DIG/DIA cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hacettepe University and Koc University Hospital, Departments of Pathology, databases were screened for DIG/DIA. Eight patients were identified. All the slides were reevaluated, and patients' clinical data were obtained. All cases were tested for <i>BRAF</i> V600 mutation and 3 <i>BRAF</i> V600 wild-type cases were sequenced.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median age at the diagnosis was 5.5 months (4-30 months). The female to male ratio was 6:2. Two cases recurred. Four cases showed <i>BRAF</i> p. V600 mutation. Of those <i>BRAF</i> p. V600 wild-type cases, one harbored <i>TMEM106B::BRAF</i> fusion, described for the first time in a DIG/DIA case.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DIG/DIA is a low-grade tumor seen in early childhood and characterized by an indolent clinical course. The most common molecular signature of these tumors is <i>BRAF</i> alterations, including rearrangements. The primary differential diagnosis is infant-type hemispheric glioma and given the similarities, pathologists must remain careful to ensure accurate diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"8 1","pages":"vdaf224"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12817074/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146021114","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Combination tumors of the nervous system: A single-center analysis of a rare condition and comprehensive review of the literature. 神经系统合并肿瘤:一种罕见疾病的单中心分析和文献综述。
IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf225
Jan Teuber, Abigail K Suwala, David Reuss, Gerhard Jungwirth, Christopher Beynon, Moritz Scherer, Andreas Unterberg, Christine Jungk

Background: With less than 650 published cases, combination tumors of the nervous system, that is, two locally intertwined but histologically distinct tumor entities, pose a rare constellation, its clinical relevance still being a matter of debate.

Methods: A consecutive cohort of 2530 patients operated on meningioma or hemangioblastoma between 2009 and 2021 was retrospectively screened for concomitant neoplastic disease to identify cases of combination tumors. Additionally, all available literature published between 1930 and 2021 was compiled in a comprehensive review.

Results: Our cohort comprised 144 cases of patients with concomitant neoplastic disease and among those 10 instances of combination tumors. Another instance occurred after our screening period. Benign entities were meningiomas, but no hemangioblastoma. Contributing tumors were adenocarcinomas, lymphoma, glioblastoma, pituitary neuroendocrine tumors, and neurinoma. Patients' age ranged from 41 to 81 years with a slight preference for females. Identification of concomitant neoplasia was first achieved due to the combination tumor in about half of our cases. For the rest, median latency until manifestation of the combination tumor was 9 years. The odds ratio for a combination tumor was 17.6 for meningioma patients with known concomitant neoplasia, but it was preoperatively suspected in 18.2% of cases only.

Conclusion: Presenting one of the largest clinical series, we provide evidence that known concomitant neoplasia in patients with suspected meningioma should make clinicians consider a combination tumor. Confirmation may lead to therapeutic consequences, largely contributing to long-term prognosis. Furthermore, we present the most extensive literature review on the matter to date.

背景:已发表病例不足650例,神经系统合并肿瘤,即两种局部交织但组织学上不同的肿瘤实体,构成了一个罕见的集群,其临床相关性仍存在争议。方法:对2009年至2021年期间接受脑膜瘤或血管母细胞瘤手术的2530例患者进行回顾性筛查,以确定合并肿瘤病例。此外,对1930年至2021年间发表的所有可用文献进行了综合综述。结果:我们的队列包括144例合并肿瘤疾病的患者,其中10例合并肿瘤。另一个案例发生在我们的筛选期之后。良性实体为脑膜瘤,未见血管母细胞瘤。主要肿瘤包括腺癌、淋巴瘤、胶质母细胞瘤、垂体神经内分泌肿瘤和神经瘤。患者年龄在41 ~ 81岁之间,以女性居多。在我们的病例中,大约一半的合并肿瘤首先被诊断为伴发性肿瘤。其余患者中位潜伏期为9年,直至合并肿瘤出现。已知合并肿瘤的脑膜瘤患者合并肿瘤的优势比为17.6,但术前仅18.2%的病例怀疑合并肿瘤。结论:通过最大的临床系列之一,我们提供的证据表明,疑似脑膜瘤患者的已知伴发瘤应使临床医生考虑合并肿瘤。确认可能导致治疗结果,在很大程度上有助于长期预后。此外,我们提出了迄今为止最广泛的文献综述。
{"title":"Combination tumors of the nervous system: A single-center analysis of a rare condition and comprehensive review of the literature.","authors":"Jan Teuber, Abigail K Suwala, David Reuss, Gerhard Jungwirth, Christopher Beynon, Moritz Scherer, Andreas Unterberg, Christine Jungk","doi":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf225","DOIUrl":"10.1093/noajnl/vdaf225","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With less than 650 published cases, combination tumors of the nervous system, that is, two locally intertwined but histologically distinct tumor entities, pose a rare constellation, its clinical relevance still being a matter of debate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consecutive cohort of 2530 patients operated on meningioma or hemangioblastoma between 2009 and 2021 was retrospectively screened for concomitant neoplastic disease to identify cases of combination tumors. Additionally, all available literature published between 1930 and 2021 was compiled in a comprehensive review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort comprised 144 cases of patients with concomitant neoplastic disease and among those 10 instances of combination tumors. Another instance occurred after our screening period. Benign entities were meningiomas, but no hemangioblastoma. Contributing tumors were adenocarcinomas, lymphoma, glioblastoma, pituitary neuroendocrine tumors, and neurinoma. Patients' age ranged from 41 to 81 years with a slight preference for females. Identification of concomitant neoplasia was first achieved due to the combination tumor in about half of our cases. For the rest, median latency until manifestation of the combination tumor was 9 years. The odds ratio for a combination tumor was 17.6 for meningioma patients with known concomitant neoplasia, but it was preoperatively suspected in 18.2% of cases only.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Presenting one of the largest clinical series, we provide evidence that known concomitant neoplasia in patients with suspected meningioma should make clinicians consider a combination tumor. Confirmation may lead to therapeutic consequences, largely contributing to long-term prognosis. Furthermore, we present the most extensive literature review on the matter to date.</p>","PeriodicalId":94157,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology advances","volume":"7 1","pages":"vdaf225"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12746596/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145866940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Neuro-oncology advances
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1