Pub Date : 2026-03-11DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2026.103117
Jiao Liu, Jian-Fen Pan, Wen-Jing Liu, Yue Qiu, Zhi-Xiong Mao
Positive affect during exercise is a key predictor of continued participation, yet the mechanisms through which mindfulness-based exercise influences affect remain largely inferred from retrospective, outcome-focused designs. This study used a think-aloud (TA) methodology to capture consciously accessible, moment-to-moment experience during exercise and to test whether a single bout of mindfulness-based exercise alters affect via in-task process shifts. Thirty-six adults were assigned to low or high habitual physical activity groups and completed three counterbalanced sessions of 20-min moderate-intensity treadmill running under mindfulness, distraction, and control conditions. Affective valence was assessed pre-, during, and post-exercise using the Feeling Scale. TA verbalizations recorded during exercise were transcribed and coded into theoretically grounded themes reflecting interoceptive monitoring, active self-regulation, external monitoring, and distraction. A process-level Internal Orientation Index (IOI) was computed to index the balance of internally versus externally oriented processes. Mixed-effects models showed that mindfulness robustly increased IOI relative to both distraction and control, indicating a consistent shift toward real-time interoceptive monitoring and adaptive self-regulation during exercise. Window-level analyses provided no compelling evidence of systematic temporal modulation across the bout. Conclusively, the TA evidence demonstrates that mindfulness changes how exercise is experienced in real time by strengthening internal monitoring and regulation, offering direct process-level support for proposed mechanisms of mindfulness-based exercise.
{"title":"How does mindfulness shape affective experience during exercise? A think-aloud study of real-time psychological processes.","authors":"Jiao Liu, Jian-Fen Pan, Wen-Jing Liu, Yue Qiu, Zhi-Xiong Mao","doi":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2026.103117","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2026.103117","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Positive affect during exercise is a key predictor of continued participation, yet the mechanisms through which mindfulness-based exercise influences affect remain largely inferred from retrospective, outcome-focused designs. This study used a think-aloud (TA) methodology to capture consciously accessible, moment-to-moment experience during exercise and to test whether a single bout of mindfulness-based exercise alters affect via in-task process shifts. Thirty-six adults were assigned to low or high habitual physical activity groups and completed three counterbalanced sessions of 20-min moderate-intensity treadmill running under mindfulness, distraction, and control conditions. Affective valence was assessed pre-, during, and post-exercise using the Feeling Scale. TA verbalizations recorded during exercise were transcribed and coded into theoretically grounded themes reflecting interoceptive monitoring, active self-regulation, external monitoring, and distraction. A process-level Internal Orientation Index (IOI) was computed to index the balance of internally versus externally oriented processes. Mixed-effects models showed that mindfulness robustly increased IOI relative to both distraction and control, indicating a consistent shift toward real-time interoceptive monitoring and adaptive self-regulation during exercise. Window-level analyses provided no compelling evidence of systematic temporal modulation across the bout. Conclusively, the TA evidence demonstrates that mindfulness changes how exercise is experienced in real time by strengthening internal monitoring and regulation, offering direct process-level support for proposed mechanisms of mindfulness-based exercise.</p>","PeriodicalId":94181,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of sport and exercise","volume":" ","pages":"103117"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147461410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-03DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2026.103112
Markus Raab, Katherine Tamminen
{"title":"PSE 25th Anniversary Editorial.","authors":"Markus Raab, Katherine Tamminen","doi":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2026.103112","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2026.103112","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94181,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of sport and exercise","volume":" ","pages":"103112"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147367869","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-03-03DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2026.103100
Pepe Vanaclocha-Amat, Avery D Faigenbaum, Javier Molina-García, Emilio Villa-González
Most children fail to meet physical activity (PA) guidelines, including muscle-strengthening recommendations, despite the strong association between muscular fitness (MF) and long-term health. This study examined the effects of a school-based pediatric resistance training (PRT) FunctionalHIIT program, delivered with or without gamification, on MF, body composition, PA profile, enjoyment, and motivation. A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted with 254 primary schoolchildren (127 boys, 127 girls; 11.10 ± 0.63 years) from six public schools in Valencia, Spain. Over an 8-week intervention integrated into Physical Education (PE) lessons, schools were allocated to one of three groups: PRT FunctionalHIIT with gamification (EG + G), PRT FunctionalHIIT (EG), or a control group (CG). Outcomes were analysed using mixed-design factorial ANOVA (time × group) with Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc tests. Significant time × group interactions were observed across all MF outcomes (all p < 0.001). Both experimental groups improved selected MF components, with EG + G showing significant gains in push-ups, standing long jump, and single-leg hop compared with EG and CG (p < 0.001). Significant interactions were also found for enjoyment, intrinsic motivation, and identified regulation (p < 0.001), with the EG + G reporting higher enjoyment than CG and lower amotivation than EG and CG (p < 0.05). No consistent interaction effects were observed for body composition or overall PA profile, although sedentary behavior was lower in EG + G at post-intervention (p < 0.05). These findings support that PRT FunctionalHIIT implemented during PE is a feasible and engaging school-based approach to enhance MF, enjoyment, and motivation among children, particularly when combined with gamification. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06145529). Registered on 24/11/2023.
{"title":"Strength and Gamification in Physical Education: Effects of a gamified pediatric resistance training program on muscular fitness, enjoyment, and motivation in schoolchildren.","authors":"Pepe Vanaclocha-Amat, Avery D Faigenbaum, Javier Molina-García, Emilio Villa-González","doi":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2026.103100","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2026.103100","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most children fail to meet physical activity (PA) guidelines, including muscle-strengthening recommendations, despite the strong association between muscular fitness (MF) and long-term health. This study examined the effects of a school-based pediatric resistance training (PRT) FunctionalHIIT program, delivered with or without gamification, on MF, body composition, PA profile, enjoyment, and motivation. A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted with 254 primary schoolchildren (127 boys, 127 girls; 11.10 ± 0.63 years) from six public schools in Valencia, Spain. Over an 8-week intervention integrated into Physical Education (PE) lessons, schools were allocated to one of three groups: PRT FunctionalHIIT with gamification (EG + G), PRT FunctionalHIIT (EG), or a control group (CG). Outcomes were analysed using mixed-design factorial ANOVA (time × group) with Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc tests. Significant time × group interactions were observed across all MF outcomes (all p < 0.001). Both experimental groups improved selected MF components, with EG + G showing significant gains in push-ups, standing long jump, and single-leg hop compared with EG and CG (p < 0.001). Significant interactions were also found for enjoyment, intrinsic motivation, and identified regulation (p < 0.001), with the EG + G reporting higher enjoyment than CG and lower amotivation than EG and CG (p < 0.05). No consistent interaction effects were observed for body composition or overall PA profile, although sedentary behavior was lower in EG + G at post-intervention (p < 0.05). These findings support that PRT FunctionalHIIT implemented during PE is a feasible and engaging school-based approach to enhance MF, enjoyment, and motivation among children, particularly when combined with gamification. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06145529). Registered on 24/11/2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":94181,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of sport and exercise","volume":" ","pages":"103100"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147367910","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-27DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.103032
Ting-Yu Lin, Hao-Chien Cheng, Tsung-Min Hung
This article has been withdrawn at the request of the editors due to an error in the publishing process. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/article-withdrawal
{"title":"WITHDRAWN: Comparing Positive Rates in Traditional Articles and Registered Reports within Sport and Exercise Science: A Stage 1 Registered Report","authors":"Ting-Yu Lin, Hao-Chien Cheng, Tsung-Min Hung","doi":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.103032","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.103032","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article has been withdrawn at the request of the editors due to an error in the publishing process. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause.\u0000The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/article-withdrawal</p>","PeriodicalId":94181,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of sport and exercise","volume":" ","pages":"103032"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147329001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-11DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.103025
Anthony Papathomas
This essay provides a reflective commentary on Smith et al.'s "25 years of qualitative research in sport and exercise psychology" piece. Alongside summarising the primary insights of their review, I seek to situate current qualitative sport and exercise work within psychology's long-standing quest for scientific legitimacy. Including a whistle-stop tour of the history of psychology, I argue that a form of disciplinary imposter syndrome has shaped psychological science and continues to influence contemporary qualitative research. The consequences of this scientism are a trend towards formulaic, risk-averse, qualitative inquiry-by-numbers. Extending Brinkmann's (2015) McDonaldization metaphor, I propose McDowellisation; which positions qualitative methodolatry as motivated by a quest to appear more objective, more scientific, and ultimately more like our "real science" quantitative cousins. The danger is that the field of qualitative research foregoes the very qualities that inspired its rise. My optimistic conclusion is to follow the lead of those scholars that have rejected rigid fast-food processes in favour or rigorous, reflexive, interpretive work across a broad range of methodologies.
{"title":"Abandoning The Big Mick: A commentary on Smith et al.'s 25 years of qualitative research in sport and exercise psychology.","authors":"Anthony Papathomas","doi":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.103025","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.103025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This essay provides a reflective commentary on Smith et al.'s \"25 years of qualitative research in sport and exercise psychology\" piece. Alongside summarising the primary insights of their review, I seek to situate current qualitative sport and exercise work within psychology's long-standing quest for scientific legitimacy. Including a whistle-stop tour of the history of psychology, I argue that a form of disciplinary imposter syndrome has shaped psychological science and continues to influence contemporary qualitative research. The consequences of this scientism are a trend towards formulaic, risk-averse, qualitative inquiry-by-numbers. Extending Brinkmann's (2015) McDonaldization metaphor, I propose McDowellisation; which positions qualitative methodolatry as motivated by a quest to appear more objective, more scientific, and ultimately more like our \"real science\" quantitative cousins. The danger is that the field of qualitative research foregoes the very qualities that inspired its rise. My optimistic conclusion is to follow the lead of those scholars that have rejected rigid fast-food processes in favour or rigorous, reflexive, interpretive work across a broad range of methodologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94181,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of sport and exercise","volume":" ","pages":"103025"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145515328","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-08-06DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102966
Jane Holden, Christopher R D Wagstaff, Ross Wadey, Peter Brown
Elite athletes face a range of challenges throughout their careers including injury, selection, funding status, and retirement. To support athletes to plan for and overcome these challenges, Career Assistance Programs (CAPs) have been developed to support personal and professional development, yet engagement with these services remains low. The aim of this study was to explore the perceived barriers to athletes' engagement with personal development within the UK High-Performance sport system. Underpinned by ontological relativism and epistemological constructivism, 15 elite athletes who were on a funded UK Sport World Class Olympic or Paralympic Program participated in semi-structured interviews. The dataset was analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Three themes were developed: The Athlete Bubble, outlines the barrier of the performance-driven culture, Head in the Sand reflects the fear of retirement, and Bridging the Employment Gap highlights the tension of meeting training demands with work opportunities. Findings reveal how cultural expectations, elite sport environments, coach-athlete relationships and scheduling conflicts inhibit athlete engagement with personal development. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the cultural and systemic barriers that shape how athletes interpret and navigate their development journeys and offers direction for developing more integrated, athlete-centered CAPs.
{"title":"Exploring the barriers to athlete personal development within UK Olympic and Paralympic sport.","authors":"Jane Holden, Christopher R D Wagstaff, Ross Wadey, Peter Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102966","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102966","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Elite athletes face a range of challenges throughout their careers including injury, selection, funding status, and retirement. To support athletes to plan for and overcome these challenges, Career Assistance Programs (CAPs) have been developed to support personal and professional development, yet engagement with these services remains low. The aim of this study was to explore the perceived barriers to athletes' engagement with personal development within the UK High-Performance sport system. Underpinned by ontological relativism and epistemological constructivism, 15 elite athletes who were on a funded UK Sport World Class Olympic or Paralympic Program participated in semi-structured interviews. The dataset was analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Three themes were developed: The Athlete Bubble, outlines the barrier of the performance-driven culture, Head in the Sand reflects the fear of retirement, and Bridging the Employment Gap highlights the tension of meeting training demands with work opportunities. Findings reveal how cultural expectations, elite sport environments, coach-athlete relationships and scheduling conflicts inhibit athlete engagement with personal development. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the cultural and systemic barriers that shape how athletes interpret and navigate their development journeys and offers direction for developing more integrated, athlete-centered CAPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94181,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of sport and exercise","volume":" ","pages":"102966"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144801335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-08-08DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102968
Paolo M Cunha, Leandro Dos Santos, Fabian Herold, Pamela Castro-E-Silva, Yanxia Chen, Yu-Bu Wang, Vanessa Santos-Melo, Edilaine Fungari Cavalcante, Luís Alves de Lima, Silvana Cardoso de Souza, Liye Zou, Brendon Stubbs, Felipe B Schuch, Edilson S Cyrino
Purpose: This study aimed to examine the effects of 12 weeks of resistance training (RT) on sleep quality, mental health, cognitive function, and functional capacity among older women with both good and poor subjective sleep quality.
Methods: A total of 160 older women (69.2 ± 5.7 years) were randomly assigned to two experimental conditions: the RT group and the control group (CG). Each group was further divided based on their initial subjective sleep quality ratings into Poor Sleep RT, Good Sleep RT, Poor Sleep CG, and Good Sleep CG. The supervised RT program, which lasted 12 weeks in the training groups, included eight exercises performed with 8-12 repetitions and progressive loading. Sleep quality and mental health were assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale, and the Beck Anxiety Inventory. Cognitive functions were measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Trail Making Test A and B, Verbal Fluency Test, and Stroop Test. Functional capacity was evaluated using the 6-min walk test, the 4-m usual walking speed test, the walking agility test, and the 30-s chair stand test.
Results: Interaction effects were observed in specific mental health outcomes and sleep quality (P < 0.05). In the Poor Sleep RT group, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores decreased from 7.26 ± 2.89 to 4.61 ± 2.83 (P < 0.001), with post-training values lower than those in both control groups. The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) scores also significantly declined in both RT groups, as seen in the Poor Sleep RT group, where scores decreased from 6.40 ± 4.00 to 2.65 ± 4.19. Similarly, depressive symptoms (assessed by the PHQ-9) decreased post-training in both RT groups, showing lower values than the controls. Additionally, similar interaction effects provoked by RT were revealed for cognitive performance (P < 0.05) and functional capacity (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: Our results suggest that a 12-week RT program can improve subjective sleep quality, mental health, cognitive function, and functional capacity, regardless of initial sleep quality levels.
{"title":"Impact of resistance training on sleep quality, mental health, and functional capacity in older women with varying baseline sleep quality: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Paolo M Cunha, Leandro Dos Santos, Fabian Herold, Pamela Castro-E-Silva, Yanxia Chen, Yu-Bu Wang, Vanessa Santos-Melo, Edilaine Fungari Cavalcante, Luís Alves de Lima, Silvana Cardoso de Souza, Liye Zou, Brendon Stubbs, Felipe B Schuch, Edilson S Cyrino","doi":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102968","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102968","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to examine the effects of 12 weeks of resistance training (RT) on sleep quality, mental health, cognitive function, and functional capacity among older women with both good and poor subjective sleep quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 160 older women (69.2 ± 5.7 years) were randomly assigned to two experimental conditions: the RT group and the control group (CG). Each group was further divided based on their initial subjective sleep quality ratings into Poor Sleep RT, Good Sleep RT, Poor Sleep CG, and Good Sleep CG. The supervised RT program, which lasted 12 weeks in the training groups, included eight exercises performed with 8-12 repetitions and progressive loading. Sleep quality and mental health were assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale, and the Beck Anxiety Inventory. Cognitive functions were measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Trail Making Test A and B, Verbal Fluency Test, and Stroop Test. Functional capacity was evaluated using the 6-min walk test, the 4-m usual walking speed test, the walking agility test, and the 30-s chair stand test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Interaction effects were observed in specific mental health outcomes and sleep quality (P < 0.05). In the Poor Sleep RT group, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores decreased from 7.26 ± 2.89 to 4.61 ± 2.83 (P < 0.001), with post-training values lower than those in both control groups. The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) scores also significantly declined in both RT groups, as seen in the Poor Sleep RT group, where scores decreased from 6.40 ± 4.00 to 2.65 ± 4.19. Similarly, depressive symptoms (assessed by the PHQ-9) decreased post-training in both RT groups, showing lower values than the controls. Additionally, similar interaction effects provoked by RT were revealed for cognitive performance (P < 0.05) and functional capacity (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that a 12-week RT program can improve subjective sleep quality, mental health, cognitive function, and functional capacity, regardless of initial sleep quality levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":94181,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of sport and exercise","volume":" ","pages":"102968"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144818943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-07-29DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102963
Vasco Bastos, Panteleimon Ekkekakis, Ana Jesus Andrade, Diogo Santos Teixeira
Objective: Contemporary research has highlighted the important role of affect, affect-related cognitions (e.g., remembered/anticipated affect), and enjoyment for exercise adherence. The peak-and-end rule postulates that the affective peaks and end encountered during an episode of experience influence how pleasant/unpleasant the episode is remembered. This study aimed to explore the influence of these specific moments on affect-related cognitions, enjoyment, and exercise frequency.
Method: This study was based on a randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups. Forty-six non-regular exercisers (Mage = 32.00 years; SD = 8.62; 43.5 % male) were randomly allocated. Both groups participated in three exercise sessions structured according to the Frequency-Intensity-Time-Type (FITT) principle. However, in the experimental group, participants were encouraged to regulate their intensity using strategies theorized to promote pleasure. The Feeling Scale (FS) was used to measure affective responses. Linear regression analyses were applied to test the ability of FS peaks and FS end, in addition to the FS mean, FS slope, and FS start to predict remembered affect, next-session anticipated affect, enjoyment, and post-intervention exercise frequency (first week and the average of 8-week follow-up).
Results: All FS variables, except for the FS slope, meaningfully predicted remembered/anticipated affect and enjoyment (10 %-47 % explained variance). Regarding post-intervention exercise frequency, both affect-related cognitions and enjoyment exhibited significant predictive power (7 %-20 % explained variance).
Conclusion: The results corroborate the relevance of the peak and end rule and the value of affect-related cognitions and enjoyment for exercise adherence. Future studies should further test these concepts in longer interventions and follow-up periods.
{"title":"The peak and end rule, affect-related cognitions, enjoyment, and exercise frequency: A randomized controlled trial ancillary study.","authors":"Vasco Bastos, Panteleimon Ekkekakis, Ana Jesus Andrade, Diogo Santos Teixeira","doi":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102963","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102963","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Contemporary research has highlighted the important role of affect, affect-related cognitions (e.g., remembered/anticipated affect), and enjoyment for exercise adherence. The peak-and-end rule postulates that the affective peaks and end encountered during an episode of experience influence how pleasant/unpleasant the episode is remembered. This study aimed to explore the influence of these specific moments on affect-related cognitions, enjoyment, and exercise frequency.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study was based on a randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups. Forty-six non-regular exercisers (M<sub>age</sub> = 32.00 years; SD = 8.62; 43.5 % male) were randomly allocated. Both groups participated in three exercise sessions structured according to the Frequency-Intensity-Time-Type (FITT) principle. However, in the experimental group, participants were encouraged to regulate their intensity using strategies theorized to promote pleasure. The Feeling Scale (FS) was used to measure affective responses. Linear regression analyses were applied to test the ability of FS peaks and FS end, in addition to the FS mean, FS slope, and FS start to predict remembered affect, next-session anticipated affect, enjoyment, and post-intervention exercise frequency (first week and the average of 8-week follow-up).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All FS variables, except for the FS slope, meaningfully predicted remembered/anticipated affect and enjoyment (10 %-47 % explained variance). Regarding post-intervention exercise frequency, both affect-related cognitions and enjoyment exhibited significant predictive power (7 %-20 % explained variance).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results corroborate the relevance of the peak and end rule and the value of affect-related cognitions and enjoyment for exercise adherence. Future studies should further test these concepts in longer interventions and follow-up periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":94181,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of sport and exercise","volume":" ","pages":"102963"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144762894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-09DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102995
Pei-Ju Tsai, Hao-Chien Cheng, Tsung-Min Hung, Ting-Yu Lin
This Stage 2 registered report analyzed the rates at which hypotheses were supported in registered reports versus traditional publications within sport and exercise science. A title and abstract search using the term "registered report∗" conducted in late 2024 yielded 4235 records from PubMed and 1011 from Scopus. After removing duplicates, 4693 records were screened, and 14 full texts were reviewed independently by two authors. Ten registered reports that included at least one hypothesis were identified, resulting in 41 hypotheses. By matching journal and publication year, 59 traditional articles were selected, yielding 162 hypotheses. When restricted to the first hypothesis, as in prior research, the support rates were 70 % for registered reports and 86 % for traditional articles, a marginally significant difference (p = .095). When all hypotheses were included, the support rates were 54 % and 79 % for registered reports and traditional publications, respectively-a statistically significant difference (p < .001). These findings provide initial evidence that, similar to the field of psychology, registered reports in sport and exercise science are less likely to report conclusions supporting the stated hypotheses compared to traditionally published counterparts. Exploratory analyses showed that the difference in positive findings between psychology and sport and exercise for traditional articles was statistically significant (p = .014). However, this finding should be interpreted with caution due to potential confounding factors, including differences in publication periods, study selection strategies, and whether journal matching was applied.
{"title":"Comparing positive rates in traditional articles and registered reports within sport and exercise science: A stage 2 registered report.","authors":"Pei-Ju Tsai, Hao-Chien Cheng, Tsung-Min Hung, Ting-Yu Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102995","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102995","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This Stage 2 registered report analyzed the rates at which hypotheses were supported in registered reports versus traditional publications within sport and exercise science. A title and abstract search using the term \"registered report∗\" conducted in late 2024 yielded 4235 records from PubMed and 1011 from Scopus. After removing duplicates, 4693 records were screened, and 14 full texts were reviewed independently by two authors. Ten registered reports that included at least one hypothesis were identified, resulting in 41 hypotheses. By matching journal and publication year, 59 traditional articles were selected, yielding 162 hypotheses. When restricted to the first hypothesis, as in prior research, the support rates were 70 % for registered reports and 86 % for traditional articles, a marginally significant difference (p = .095). When all hypotheses were included, the support rates were 54 % and 79 % for registered reports and traditional publications, respectively-a statistically significant difference (p < .001). These findings provide initial evidence that, similar to the field of psychology, registered reports in sport and exercise science are less likely to report conclusions supporting the stated hypotheses compared to traditionally published counterparts. Exploratory analyses showed that the difference in positive findings between psychology and sport and exercise for traditional articles was statistically significant (p = .014). However, this finding should be interpreted with caution due to potential confounding factors, including differences in publication periods, study selection strategies, and whether journal matching was applied.</p>","PeriodicalId":94181,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of sport and exercise","volume":" ","pages":"102995"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145042844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-15DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102663
Christopher Mesagno, Adwoah A Hammond, Matthew A Goodyear
{"title":"An Initial Investigation into the Mental Health Difficulties in Athletes who Experience Choking under Pressure.","authors":"Christopher Mesagno, Adwoah A Hammond, Matthew A Goodyear","doi":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102663","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102663","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94181,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of sport and exercise","volume":"45 10","pages":"102663"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140975586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}