The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy最新文献

Background: Current guidelines for the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) recommend 5 days of antimicrobial therapy. Despite these recommendations, the duration of therapy exceeds 5 days for up to 70% of patients, with most superfluous prescribing occurring upon discharge from hospital. Shortening the duration of antibiotic therapy could decrease adverse events, resistance, and costs.

Objective: To determine whether a pharmacist-initiated modification to the duration of antibiotic therapy prescribed for the treatment of AECOPD or CAP reduced the duration of antibiotic prescriptions.

Methods: In this prospective, single-centre study of adult inpatients receiving antibiotics for the treatment of AECOPD or CAP between October 2020 and March 2021, pharmacists assigned a 5-day duration to antimicrobials prescribed for these indications. For patients discharged before completion of therapy, the antibiotic start date and intended duration were included on the discharge prescription. Study patients were matched 1:1 with historical controls to compare the total duration of antibiotic therapy with and without the intervention.

Results: A total of 100 patients (66 with CAP and 34 with AECOPD) met the inclusion criteria and had their antibiotic treatment duration modified to 5 days. Mean total duration of antibiotic therapy was 5.31 days in the intervention group and 7.11 days in the control group (p < 0.001). Outpatient antibiotic prescribing was 0.86 days in the intervention group and 3.2 days in the control group (p < 0.001). In both groups, the rates of readmission at 30 and 90 days were 19% and 31%, respectively.

Conclusions: Pharmacist-initiated modification of antimicrobial therapy resulted in shortening of the duration of therapy by almost 2 days. Including information about treatment duration on the discharge prescription reduced outpatient prescribing without affecting readmission rates.

Background: Given altered pharmacokinetics in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF), there is debate regarding optimal strategies for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for aminoglycosides and vancomycin administered intravenously.

Objectives: To determine the TDM strategy for IV aminoglycosides and IV vancomycin associated with optimal clinical outcomes in pwCF.

Data sources: Several databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov ) were searched from inception to November 15, 2020, with searches rerun on February 13, 2023.

Study selection and data extraction: Full articles evaluating TDM strategies and clinical outcomes in pwCF receiving IV aminoglycosides or IV vancomycin were included.

Data synthesis: Three studies met the inclusion criteria for IV aminoglycosides, and 1 study met the inclusion criteria for IV vancomycin. Data are presented with descriptive analyses.

Conclusions: The available evidence is insufficient to determine an optimal TDM strategy for IV aminoglycoside or IV vancomycin therapy in pwCF.

Background: Clinical Pharmacist Practitioners (CPPs) are independent care providers who practise to their full scope and have a positive impact on the quality of patient care. Ideally, all pharmacists in Canada would perform at this level. However, there is significant diversity in pharmacy practice across the country and among practice settings. It would be valuable to better understand how pharmacists attain CPP-level practice and what strategies might enable more pharmacists to practise at this level.

Objectives: To understand the perceptions of current CPPs and stakeholders in the health care system regarding the status of the CPP role in Canada and to propose pathways that would facilitate the attainment and recognition of CPP-level practice.

Methods: A qualitative study was conducted using semistructured interviews of peer-nominated CPPs and health care system stakeholders. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and then analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Interviews involving 13 CPPs and 6 health care system stakeholders, conducted between March and July 2020, yielded 3 theme categories related to CPP roles, each containing subthemes, and 3 distinct themes relating to pathways forward. The 3 pathway themes were the following: that a legislative solution for expanded pharmacist scope is needed, that a new degree program is not required for pharmacy in Canada, and that a unified national credential signifying high-level practice might allow for better recognition of CPPs.

Conclusions: The full potential of pharmacists practising with advanced scope of practice in Canada has yet to be realized. Although significant external challenges exist, pharmacists must reframe the narrative by clearly articulating and defining their role within the Canadian health care system to increase CPP-level practice.

Background: Pharmacists in the province of Alberta may apply for additional prescribing authorization (APA), which allows them to independently prescribe medications. Currently, no literature exists about pharmacist prescribing for inpatients at the time of discharge.

Objectives: The primary objective was to report the proportion of patients for whom inpatient pharmacists with APA prescribed at discharge across Alberta, Canada. Secondary objectives were to describe discharge interventions other than prescribing that were provided, enablers of and barriers to discharge prescribing, and differences in discharge prescribing by facility or population type, clinical area, and health care charting system.

Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional web-based survey of inpatient pharmacists with APA across Alberta was conducted over a 6-week period in early 2022.

Results: A total of 104 respondents met the inclusion criteria. Under half (45/102, 44.1%) of the participants reported prescribing at discharge. Those that reported prescribing at discharge did so for only a median 14.5% of their patients. The most common enabler of discharge prescribing was a supportive care team, and the most common barrier was the presence of other prescribers. Pharmacists who did not report prescribing at discharge selected "discomfort with being responsible for the prescription" and "fear of professional liability" as barriers more often than those who did report discharge prescribing (51.0% [26/51] vs 33.3% [13/39] and 43.1% [22/51] vs 25.6% [10/39], respectively). The proportion of pharmacists who reported prescribing at discharge was greater with increasing population/facility size (30% [6/20] of pharmacists in settings that served small populations vs 50% [29/58] of those in settings that served large populations).

Conclusions: Inpatient pharmacists who use APA at discharge reported prescribing for only a minority of patients, and discharge prescribing practices varied widely across the province. Future areas of research include how pharmacists can overcome barriers to prescribing at discharge.

Background: Previous studies have found significant inhaler wastage in the inpatient setting, which contributes to unnecessary health care expenditures. Wastage may involve inhalers available in automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs).

Objectives: To evaluate whether salbutamol and ipratropium inhalers were unnecessarily withdrawn from ADCs for hospital inpatients.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included patients from 16 health care facilities in British Columbia. ADC reports were run for the period August 2021 to January 2022 to identify salbutamol and ipratropium inhalers removed from ADCs.

Results: Over the study period, 8.3% (2180/26 324) of salbutamol and ipratropium inhalers were withdrawn from ADCs unnecessarily for the same patient encounter within a 2-day timeframe, and another 1118 (4.2%) represented instances when multiple inhalers were withdrawn for the same patient at the same time. Overall, 12.5% (3298/26 324) of all salbutamol and ipratropium inhalers were withdrawn unnecessarily. The total cost of these inhalers was about $31 600 over the 6-month period.

Conclusions: This evaluation revealed considerable wastage of inhalers, leading to wasted expenditures. Other health authorities should conduct similar analyses to determine whether similar problems exist in their settings.