Cardiology Research最新文献

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is one of the most common genetic inherited diseases of myocardium, which is caused by mutation in genes encoding proteins for the cardiac sarcomere. It is the most frequent cause of sudden death in young people and trained athletes. All diagnostic methods, including heart catheterization, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, genetic counseling and tissue biopsy are required for risk and therapy stratification and should be individualized depending on phenotype and genotype. Current therapy has not been tested adequately. Beta-blockers and verapamil can cause hypotension which can make hypertrophic cardiomyopathy worse. Disopyramide has been inadequately studied, and mavacamten was only studied in small trials. More definitive trials are currently ongoing. Novel invasive and noninvasive diagnostics, medical therapies, interventional and surgical approaches tend to influence the natural history of the disease, favoring a better future for this patient population.

Background: Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed and leading cause of cancer-related deaths among females. The treatment of breast cancer with radiotherapy, albeit effective, has been shown to be toxic to the heart, resulting in an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease and associated fatalities.

Methods: In this study, we evaluated the impact of respiratory movement, treatment plans and dose calculation algorithm on the dose delivered to the heart and its substructures during left breast radiotherapy over a cohort of 10 patients. We did this through three image sets, four different treatment plans and the employment of three algorithms on the same treatment plan. The dose parameters were then employed to estimate the impact on the 9-year excess cumulative risk for acute cardiac events by applying the model proposed by Darby.

Results: The left ventricle was the structure most irradiated. Due to the lack of four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT), we used a set of images called phase-average CT that correspond to the average of the images from the respiratory cycle (exhale, exhale 50%, inhale, inhale 50%). When considering these images, nearly 10% of the heart received more than 5 Gy and doses were on average 27% higher when compared to free breathing images. Deep inspiration breath-hold plans reduced cardiac dose for nine out of 10 patients and reduced mean heart dose in about 50% when compared to reference plans. We also found that the implementation of deep inspiration breath-hold would reduce the relative lifetime risk of ischemic heart disease to 10%, in comparison to 21% from the reference plan.

Conclusion: Our findings illustrate the importance of a more accurate determination of the dose and its consideration in cardiologists' consultation, a factor often overlooked during clinical examination. They also motivate the evaluation of the dose to the heart substructures to derive new heart dose constraints, and a more mindful and individualized clinical practice depending on the treatment employed.

Background: The antihypertensive agent telmisartan is an angiotensin II receptor blocker with a terminal elimination half-life of 24 h and has a high lipophilicity, thereby enhancing its bioavailability. Another antihypertensive agent, cilnidipine is a calcium antagonist and has dual mode of action on the calcium channels. This study aimed at determining effect of these drugs on ambulatory blood pressure (BP) levels.

Methods: A randomized, open-label, single-center study was conducted during 2021 - 2022 on newly diagnosed adult patients with stage-I hypertension, in a mega city of India. Forty eligible patients were randomized to telmisartan (40 mg) and cilnidipine (10 mg) groups, with once daily dose administered for 56 consecutive days. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) (24 h) was performed pre- and post-treatment, and the ABPM-derived parameters were compared statistically.

Results: Statistically significant mean reductions were observed in all BP endpoints in telmisartan group but only in 24-h systolic blood pressure (SBP), daytime and nighttime SBP, and manual SBP and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in cilnidipine group. The mean change from baseline to day 56 between two treatment groups showed statistical significance in last 6-h SBP (P = 0.01) and DBP (P = 0.014), and morning SBP (P = 0.019) and DBP (P = 0.028). The percent nocturnal drop within and between groups was statistically nonsignificant. Also, the between group mean SBP and DBP smoothness index differed nonsignificantly.

Conclusions: Telmisartan and cilnidipine once daily were effective and well tolerated in the treatment of newly diagnosed stage-I hypertension. Telmisartan provided sustained 24-h BP control and may offer advantages over cilnidipine in terms of BP reductions, particularly over the 18- to 24-h post-dose period or critical early morning hours.

Background: Most studies have compared post-treatment electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities in cancer patients to the general population. To assess baseline cardiovascular (CV) risk, we compared pre-treatment ECG abnormalities in cancer patients with a non-cancer surgical population.

Methods: We conducted a combined prospective (n = 30) and retrospective (n = 229) cohort study of patients aged 18 - 80 years with diagnosis of hematologic or solid malignancy, compared with 267 pre-surgical, non-cancer, age- and sex-matched controls. Computerized ECG interpretations were obtained, and one-third of the ECGs underwent blinded interpretation by a board-certified cardiologist (agreement r = 0.94). We performed contingency table analyses using likelihood ratio Chi-square statistics, with calculated odds ratios. Data were analyzed after propensity score matching.

Results: The mean age of cases was 60.97 ± 13.86; and 59.44 ± 11.83 years for controls. Pre-treatment cancer patients had higher likelihood of abnormal ECG (odds ratio (OR): 1.55; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05 to 2.30), and more ECG abnormalities (χ² = 4.0502; P = 0.04) compared with non-cancer patients. ECG abnormalities were higher in black compared to non-black patients (P = 0.001). In addition, baseline ECGs among cancer patients prior to cancer therapy demonstrated less QT prolongation and intra-ventricular conduction defect (P = 0.04); but showed more arrhythmias (P < 0.01) and atrial fibrillation (AF) (P = 0.01) compared with the general patient population.

Conclusions: Based on these findings, we recommend that all cancer patients receive an ECG, a low-cost and widely available tool, as part of their CV baseline screening, prior to cancer treatment.

Background: Left-sided infective endocarditis (IE) is increasingly being recognized among intravenous drug use (IVDU) patients. We sought to assess the trends and risk factors that contribute to left-sided IE in this high-risk population at University of Kentucky.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients with the diagnosis of both IE and IVDU admitted at University of Kentucky was carried out from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019. Baseline characteristics, trends of endocarditis and clinical outcomes (mortality and in-hospital interventions) were recorded.

Results: A total of 197 patients were admitted for management of endocarditis. One hundred and fourteen (57.9%) had right-sided endocarditis, 25 (12.7%) had combined left-sided and right-sided endocarditis, and 58 (29.4%) had left-sided endocarditis. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen. Mortality and inpatient surgical interventions were higher among patients with left-sided endocarditis. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) was the most common shunt found (3.1%), followed by atrial septal defect (ASD, 2.4%) with PFO being significantly more common among patients with left-sided endocarditis.

Conclusion: Right-sided endocarditis continues to be predominant among IVDU patients and Staphylococcus aureus was the most common organism involved. Patients with evidence of left-sided disease were found to have significantly more PFO, needed more inpatient valvular surgeries, and had higher all-cause mortality. Further studies are needed to assess if PFO or ASD can increase the risk of acquiring left-sided endocarditis in IVDU.

Background: Differences in clinical presentation and therapy outcomes between heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have been reported but described mainly among hospitalized patients. Because the population of outpatients with heart failure (HF) is increasing, we sought to discriminate the clinical presentation and responses to medical therapy in ambulatory patients with new-onset HFpEF vs. HFrEF.

Methods: We retrospectively included all patients with new-onset HF treated at a single HF clinic in the past 4 years. Clinical data and electrocardiography (ECG) and echocardiography findings were recorded. Patients were followed up once weekly, and treatment response was evaluated according to symptoms resolution within 30 days. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed.

Results: A total of 146 patients were diagnosed with new-onset HF: 68 with HFpEF and 78 with HFrEF. The patients with HFrEF were older than those with HFpEF (66.9 vs. 62 years, respectively, P = 0.008). Patients with HFrEF were more likely to have coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, or valvular heart disease than those with HFpEF (P < 0.05 for all). Patients with HFrEF rather than HFpEF were more likely to present with New York Heart Association class 3 - 4 dyspnea, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea or low cardiac output (P < 0.007 for all). Patients with HFpEF were more likely than those with HFpEF to have normal ECG at presentation (P < 0.001), and left bundle branch block (LBBB) was observed only in patients with HFrEF (P < 0.001). Resolution of symptoms within 30 days occurred in 75% of patients with HFpEF and 40% of patients with HFrEF (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Ambulatory patients with new-onset HFrEF were older, and had higher incidence of structural heart disease, in comparison to those with new-onset HFpEF. Patients presenting with HFrEF had more severe functional symptoms than those with HFpEF. Patients with HFpEF were more likely than those with HFpEF to have normal ECG at the time of presentation, and LBBB was strongly associated with HFrEF. Outpatients with HFrEF rather than HFpEF were less likely to respond to treatment.

Background: There have been limited reports with inconsistent results on the impact of long-term use of oxygen therapry (LTOT) in patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Methods: We compared in-hospital and intermediate TAVR outcomes in 150 patients requiring LTOT (home O₂ cohort) with 2,313 non-home O₂ patients.

Results: Home O₂ patients were younger, and had more comorbidities including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, carotid artery disease, lower forced expiratory volume (FEV₁) (50.3±21.1% vs. 75.0±24.7%, P < 0.001), and lower diffusion capacity (DLCO, 48.6±19.2% vs. 74.6±22.4%, P < 0.001). These differences represented higher baseline Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score (15.5±10.2% vs. 9.3±7.0%, P < 0.001) and lower pre-procedure Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12) scores (32.5 ± 22.2 vs. 49.1 ± 25.4, P < 0.001). The home O₂ cohort required higher use of alternative TAVR vascular access (24.0% vs. 12.8%, P = 0.002) and general anesthesia (51.3% vs. 36.0%, P < 0.001). Compared to non-home O₂ patients, home O₂ patients showed increased in-hospital mortality (5.3% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.001), procedural cardiac arrest (4.7% vs. 1.0%, P < 0.001), and postoperative atrial fibrillation (4.0% vs. 1.5%, P = 0.013). At 1-year follow-up, the home O₂ cohort had a higher all-cause mortality (17.3% vs. 7.5%, P < 0.001) and lower KCCQ-12 scores (69.5 ± 23.8 vs. 82.1 ± 19.4, P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meir analysis revealed a lower survival rate in the home O₂ cohort with an overall mean (95% confidence interval (CI)) survival time of 6.2 (5.9 - 6.5) years (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Home O₂ patients represent a high-risk TAVR cohort with increased in-hospital morbidity and mortality, less improvement in 1-year KCCQ-12, and increased mortality at intermediate follow-up.

Background: Sedentary behavior is thought to contribute to worsening heart failure syndromes. Here, we examined whether the shelter-in-place order during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic changed daily activity duration, which was monitored by an implantable cardiac device-based multisensor index and alert algorithm called HeartLogic.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of the HeartLogic data from patients with heart failure managed at our clinic and compared the individual daily activity duration 90 days prior to vs. after implementation of the shelter-in-place order. The activity data were prepared by Boston Scientific. Demographic data were extracted from our electronic medical record.

Results: In total, 29 patients were included in the analysis. Among them, 14 patients did not have any significant changes in daily activity duration compared to their baseline before the shelter-in-place order (108.62 ± 45 min vs. 107.71 ± 48.6 min, P = 0.723). Among the rest 15 patients with significant changes, seven patients had a significant reduction in activity duration; meanwhile, eight patients had a significant increase in activity duration. Overall, the mean daily activity duration 90 days before and after the shelter-in-place order are 98.21 ± 60.83 min, and 100.03 ± 68.18 min (P = 0.753).

Conclusions: No significant changes in terms of activity duration were observed in our patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: Antiviral agents, such as remdesivir, have shown promising results in helping reduce the morbidity and healthcare burden of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in hospitalized patients. However, many studies have reported a relationship between remdesivir and bradycardia. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the relationship between bradycardia and outcomes in patients on remdesivir.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 2,935 consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to seven hospitals in Southern California in the United States between January 2020 and August 2021. First, we did a backward logistic regression to analyze the relationship between remdesivir use and other independent variables. Finally, we did a backward selection Cox multivariate regression analysis on the sub-group of patients who received remdesivir to evaluate the mortality risk in bradycardic patients on remdesivir.

Results: The mean age of the study population was 61.5 years; 56% were males, 44% received remdesivir, and 52% developed bradycardia. Our analysis showed that remdesivir was associated with increased odds of bradycardia (odds ratio (OR): 1.9, P < 0.001). Patients that were on remdesivir in our study were sicker patients with increased odds of having elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) (OR: 1.03, P < 0.001), elevated white blood cell (WBC) on admission (OR: 1.06, P < 0.001), and increased length of hospital stay (OR: 1.02, P = 0.002). However, remdesivir was associated with decreased odds of mechanical ventilation (OR: 0.53, P < 0.001). In the sub-group analysis of patients that received remdesivir, bradycardia was associated with reduced mortality risk (hazard ratio (HR): 0.69, P = 0.002).

Conclusions: Our study showed that remdesivir was associated with bradycardia in COVID-19 patients. However, it decreased the odds of being on a ventilator, even in patients with increased inflammatory markers on admission. Furthermore, patients on remdesivir that developed bradycardia had no increased risk of death. Clinicians should not withhold remdesivir from patients at risk of developing bradycardia because bradycardia in such patients was not found to worsen the clinical outcome.