首页 > 最新文献

Vaccine最新文献

英文 中文
Comparative analysis of cholera serum vibriocidal antibodies from Convalescent and vaccinated adults in Zambia. 赞比亚霍乱痊愈者和接种过疫苗的成年人血清中杀弧菌抗体的比较分析。
Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.05.027
Harriet Ng’ombe, S. Bosomprah, Bernard Phiri, Mutinta Muchimba, Fraser Liswaniso, Mwelwa Chibuye, C. C. Luchen, Kennedy Chibesa, Kalo Musukuma-Chifulo, K. Mwape, Sekayi Tigere, Suwilanji Silwamba, Annel Sinkala, M. Simuyandi, Nyuma Mbewe, Fred Kapaya, Adam F Cunningham, R. Chilengi, David Sack, C. Chisenga
{"title":"Comparative analysis of cholera serum vibriocidal antibodies from Convalescent and vaccinated adults in Zambia.","authors":"Harriet Ng’ombe, S. Bosomprah, Bernard Phiri, Mutinta Muchimba, Fraser Liswaniso, Mwelwa Chibuye, C. C. Luchen, Kennedy Chibesa, Kalo Musukuma-Chifulo, K. Mwape, Sekayi Tigere, Suwilanji Silwamba, Annel Sinkala, M. Simuyandi, Nyuma Mbewe, Fred Kapaya, Adam F Cunningham, R. Chilengi, David Sack, C. Chisenga","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.05.027","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.05.027","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94264,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141052336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of mRNA booster doses in preventing infections and hospitalizations due to SARS-CoV-2 and its dominant variant over time in Valencian healthcare workers, Spain. mRNA 强化剂量在预防西班牙巴伦西亚医护人员感染 SARS-CoV-2 及其显性变种并随时间推移住院治疗方面的效果。
Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.05.011
Natali Jiménez-Sepúlveda, Paula Gras-Valenti, P. Chico-Sánchez, José Miguel Castro-García, Elena Ronda-Pérez, H. Vanaclocha, S. Peiró, J. S. Burgos, Ana Berenguer, D. Navarro, José Sánchez-Payá
{"title":"Effectiveness of mRNA booster doses in preventing infections and hospitalizations due to SARS-CoV-2 and its dominant variant over time in Valencian healthcare workers, Spain.","authors":"Natali Jiménez-Sepúlveda, Paula Gras-Valenti, P. Chico-Sánchez, José Miguel Castro-García, Elena Ronda-Pérez, H. Vanaclocha, S. Peiró, J. S. Burgos, Ana Berenguer, D. Navarro, José Sánchez-Payá","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.05.011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.05.011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94264,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141043647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination against school absenteeism in children and adolescents hospitalized with COVID-19. 接种 COVID-19 疫苗对预防因 COVID-19 而住院的儿童和青少年旷课的效果。
Pub Date : 2024-03-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.075
Helena C Maltezou, Stavroula Kontogianni, Elisavet Michailidou, Eleni Vergadi, Theodoros V Giannouchos, Evangelia Steletou, Nikolaos V Sipsas, Emmanouil Galanakis, George A Syrogiannopoulos, Emmanuel Roilides

Background: COVID-19 vaccination has been recommended for children to protect them and to enable in-person educational and social activities.

Methods: We estimated COVID-19 vaccination effectiveness (VE) against school absenteeism in children 5-17 years old hospitalized from September 1, 2021 through May 31, 2023. Full vaccination was defined as two vaccine doses.

Results: We studied 231 children admitted to hospital with COVID-19, including 206 (89.2 %) unvaccinated/partially vaccinated and 25 (10.8 %) fully vaccinated. Unvaccinated/partially vaccinated children were absent from school for longer periods compared to fully vaccinated children (median absence: 14 versus 10 days; p-value = 0.05). Multivariable regression showed that full COVID-19 vaccination was associated with fewer days of absence compared to no/partial vaccination on average (adjusted relative risk: 0.77; 95 % CI: 0.61 to 0.98). COVID-19 VE was 50.7 % (95 % CI: -11.3 % to 78.2 %) for school absenteeism above the median duration of absenteeism.

Conclusions: Full COVID-19 vaccination conferred protection against school absenteeism in hospitalized school-aged children with COVID-19.

背景:我们建议儿童接种 COVID-19 疫苗,以保护他们并使他们能够亲自参加教育和社会活动:我们估算了2021年9月1日至2023年5月31日期间住院的5-17岁儿童接种COVID-19疫苗对缺课的有效性(VE)。完全接种定义为接种两剂疫苗:我们对 231 名接种 COVID-19 的住院儿童进行了研究,其中包括 206 名(89.2%)未接种/部分接种的儿童和 25 名(10.8%)完全接种的儿童。与完全接种疫苗的儿童相比,未接种疫苗/部分接种疫苗的儿童缺课时间更长(缺课中位数:14 天对 10 天;P 值 = 0.05)。多变量回归结果表明,与未接种/部分接种相比,接种 COVID-19 疫苗可减少平均缺课天数(调整后相对风险:0.77;95 % CI:0.61 至 0.98)。在缺勤时间超过中位数的情况下,COVID-19 VE 为 50.7 %(95 % CI:-11.3 % 至 78.2 %):结论:接种COVID-19疫苗可预防住院学龄儿童因接种COVID-19疫苗而缺课。
{"title":"Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination against school absenteeism in children and adolescents hospitalized with COVID-19.","authors":"Helena C Maltezou, Stavroula Kontogianni, Elisavet Michailidou, Eleni Vergadi, Theodoros V Giannouchos, Evangelia Steletou, Nikolaos V Sipsas, Emmanouil Galanakis, George A Syrogiannopoulos, Emmanuel Roilides","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.075","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COVID-19 vaccination has been recommended for children to protect them and to enable in-person educational and social activities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We estimated COVID-19 vaccination effectiveness (VE) against school absenteeism in children 5-17 years old hospitalized from September 1, 2021 through May 31, 2023. Full vaccination was defined as two vaccine doses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We studied 231 children admitted to hospital with COVID-19, including 206 (89.2 %) unvaccinated/partially vaccinated and 25 (10.8 %) fully vaccinated. Unvaccinated/partially vaccinated children were absent from school for longer periods compared to fully vaccinated children (median absence: 14 versus 10 days; p-value = 0.05). Multivariable regression showed that full COVID-19 vaccination was associated with fewer days of absence compared to no/partial vaccination on average (adjusted relative risk: 0.77; 95 % CI: 0.61 to 0.98). COVID-19 VE was 50.7 % (95 % CI: -11.3 % to 78.2 %) for school absenteeism above the median duration of absenteeism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Full COVID-19 vaccination conferred protection against school absenteeism in hospitalized school-aged children with COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":94264,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140332411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Self-reported determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among persons with and without autoimmune disease. 自身免疫疾病患者和非自身免疫疾病患者接受 COVID-19 疫苗的自述决定因素。
Pub Date : 2024-03-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.067
Jenny D Gong, Emma Barnboym, Megan O'Mara, Natalie Gurevich, Maya Mattar, Donald D Anthony, Adam T Perzynski, Nora G Singer

Objective: Patients with autoimmune disease (AD) are at increased risk for complications from COVID-19 infection, so, optimizing vaccine utilization in this population is of particular importance. We compared COVID-19 vaccination perspectives among persons with and without AD.

Methods: 471 patients in the MetroHealth System and Cleveland Veteran Affairs Medical Center completed a 38-item questionnaire between August 2021 and February 2022. This survey containing questions regarding COVID-19 vaccine perceptions and demographics was administered both to unvaccinated individuals and individuals who delayed vaccination for at least 2 months. Multivariable ordinary least squares regression models were created to assess factors associated with vaccination likelihood.

Results: The number of reasons given for (p < 0.001) and against receiving COVID-19 vaccination (p < 0.001) were highly associated with increased and decreased vaccination likelihood respectively. Factors most closely associated with obtaining vaccine were: protecting family (p = 0.045) personal safety (p < 0.001) and preventing serious infection (p < 0.001). Reasons associated with decreased vaccination likelihood were: lack of concern of COVID-19 infection (p < 0.001), vaccine safety (p < 0.001) and beliefs that the vaccine was made too quickly (p = 0.024). AD patients were more likely to cite having a chronic condition (29.1 % vs 17.1 %, p = 0.003) and physician recommendation(s) (18.4 % vs 9.1 %, p = 0.005) as reasons for vaccination and were more concerned about potential medication interaction than non-AD respondents (22.4 % vs 3.3 %, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The number of benefits of vaccination identified strongly related to vaccination likelihood. Affirmative provider recommendations correlated with increased vaccination likelihood in AD patients. Clinical conversations centered on the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination may help increase vaccine acceptance.

目的:自身免疫性疾病(AD)患者感染 COVID-19 引起并发症的风险增加,因此优化该人群的疫苗利用率尤为重要。方法:2021 年 8 月至 2022 年 2 月期间,MetroHealth 系统和克利夫兰退伍军人事务医疗中心的 471 名患者完成了一份包含 38 个项目的问卷调查。该调查包含有关 COVID-19 疫苗认知和人口统计学的问题,未接种者和延迟接种至少 2 个月者均参与了调查。我们建立了多变量普通最小二乘法回归模型,以评估与疫苗接种可能性相关的因素:结果:接种疫苗的原因数量(P接种疫苗的好处数量与接种可能性密切相关。提供者的肯定性建议与 AD 患者接种疫苗可能性的增加相关。以接种 COVID-19 疫苗的益处为中心的临床对话可能有助于提高疫苗的接受度。
{"title":"Self-reported determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among persons with and without autoimmune disease.","authors":"Jenny D Gong, Emma Barnboym, Megan O'Mara, Natalie Gurevich, Maya Mattar, Donald D Anthony, Adam T Perzynski, Nora G Singer","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.067","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.067","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients with autoimmune disease (AD) are at increased risk for complications from COVID-19 infection, so, optimizing vaccine utilization in this population is of particular importance. We compared COVID-19 vaccination perspectives among persons with and without AD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>471 patients in the MetroHealth System and Cleveland Veteran Affairs Medical Center completed a 38-item questionnaire between August 2021 and February 2022. This survey containing questions regarding COVID-19 vaccine perceptions and demographics was administered both to unvaccinated individuals and individuals who delayed vaccination for at least 2 months. Multivariable ordinary least squares regression models were created to assess factors associated with vaccination likelihood.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of reasons given for (p < 0.001) and against receiving COVID-19 vaccination (p < 0.001) were highly associated with increased and decreased vaccination likelihood respectively. Factors most closely associated with obtaining vaccine were: protecting family (p = 0.045) personal safety (p < 0.001) and preventing serious infection (p < 0.001). Reasons associated with decreased vaccination likelihood were: lack of concern of COVID-19 infection (p < 0.001), vaccine safety (p < 0.001) and beliefs that the vaccine was made too quickly (p = 0.024). AD patients were more likely to cite having a chronic condition (29.1 % vs 17.1 %, p = 0.003) and physician recommendation(s) (18.4 % vs 9.1 %, p = 0.005) as reasons for vaccination and were more concerned about potential medication interaction than non-AD respondents (22.4 % vs 3.3 %, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The number of benefits of vaccination identified strongly related to vaccination likelihood. Affirmative provider recommendations correlated with increased vaccination likelihood in AD patients. Clinical conversations centered on the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination may help increase vaccine acceptance.</p>","PeriodicalId":94264,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140332413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effects of PCV10 and PCV13 on pneumococcal serotype 6C disease, carriage, and antimicrobial resistance. PCV10 和 PCV13 对肺炎球菌血清 6C 型疾病、携带和抗菌药耐药性的影响。
Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.065
Lindsay R Grant, Germaine Hanquet, Ingrid T Sepúlveda-Pachón, Christian Theilacker, Marc Baay, Mary P E Slack, Luis Jodar, Bradford D Gessner

Background: The cross-protection of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) against serotype 6C is not clearly documented, although 6C represents a substantial burden of pneumococcal disease in recent years. A systematic review by the World Health Organization that covered studies through 2016 concluded that available data were insufficient to determine if either PCV10 (which contains serotype 6B but not 6A) or PCV13 (containing serotype 6A and 6B) conferred protection against 6C.

Methods: We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies published between January 2010 - August 2022 (Medline/Embase), covering the direct, indirect, and overall effect of PCV10 and PCV13 against 6C invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), non-IPD, nasopharyngeal carriage (NPC), and antimicrobial resistance (AMR).

Results: Of 2548 publications identified, 112 were included. Direct vaccine effectiveness against 6C IPD in children ranged between 70 and 85 % for ≥ 1 dose PCV13 (n = 3 studies), was 94 % in fully PCV13 vaccinated children (n = 2), and -14 % for ≥ 1 dose of PCV10 (n = 1). Compared to PCV7, PCV13 efficacy against 6C NPC in children was 66 % (n = 1). Serotype 6C IPD rates or NPC prevalence declined post-PCV13 in most studies in children (n = 5/6) and almost half of studies in adults (n = 5/11), while it increased post-PCV10 for IPD and non-IPD in all studies (n = 6/6). Changes in AMR prevalence were inconsistent.

Conclusions: In contrast to PCV10, PCV13 vaccination consistently protected against 6C IPD and NPC in children, and provided some level of indirect protection to adults, supporting that serotype 6A but not 6B provides cross-protection to 6C. Vaccine policy makers and regulators should consider the effects of serotype 6A-containing PCVs against serotype 6C disease in their decisions.

背景:肺炎球菌结合疫苗 (PCV) 对血清 6C 型的交叉保护作用尚无明确记载,尽管 6C 型是近年来肺炎球菌疾病的主要负担。世界卫生组织对截至 2016 年的研究进行了系统性回顾,得出的结论是现有数据不足以确定 PCV10(含有 6B 血清型,但不含 6A)或 PCV13(含有 6A 和 6B 血清型)是否能对 6C 产生保护作用:我们对 2010 年 1 月至 2022 年 8 月间发表的随机对照试验和观察性研究(Medline/Embase)进行了系统性回顾,内容涵盖 PCV10 和 PCV13 对 6C 侵袭性肺炎球菌疾病(IPD)、非 IPD、鼻咽带菌(NPC)和抗菌药耐药性(AMR)的直接、间接和总体影响:结果:在已确定的 2548 篇出版物中,有 112 篇被收录。接种≥1剂PCV13的儿童接种6C IPD疫苗的直接有效率在70%至85%之间(n = 3项研究),完全接种PCV13的儿童接种有效率为94%(n = 2项研究),接种≥1剂PCV10的儿童接种有效率为-14%(n = 1项研究)。与 PCV7 相比,PCV13 对儿童 6C 型鼻咽癌的有效率为 66 %(n = 1)。在大多数儿童研究(n = 5/6)和几乎一半的成人研究(n = 5/11)中,血清型 6C IPD 感染率或非 IPD 感染率在 PCV13 后有所下降,而在所有研究(n = 6/6)中,IPD 和非 IPD 感染率在 PCV10 后有所上升。AMR流行率的变化并不一致:结论:与 PCV10 相比,接种 PCV13 可持续预防儿童 6C IPD 和非 IPD,并为成人提供一定程度的间接保护,这证明血清型 6A 而非 6B 可为 6C 提供交叉保护。疫苗政策制定者和监管者在决策时应考虑含血清 6A 型 PCV 对血清 6C 型疾病的影响。
{"title":"Effects of PCV10 and PCV13 on pneumococcal serotype 6C disease, carriage, and antimicrobial resistance.","authors":"Lindsay R Grant, Germaine Hanquet, Ingrid T Sepúlveda-Pachón, Christian Theilacker, Marc Baay, Mary P E Slack, Luis Jodar, Bradford D Gessner","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.065","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The cross-protection of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) against serotype 6C is not clearly documented, although 6C represents a substantial burden of pneumococcal disease in recent years. A systematic review by the World Health Organization that covered studies through 2016 concluded that available data were insufficient to determine if either PCV10 (which contains serotype 6B but not 6A) or PCV13 (containing serotype 6A and 6B) conferred protection against 6C.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies published between January 2010 - August 2022 (Medline/Embase), covering the direct, indirect, and overall effect of PCV10 and PCV13 against 6C invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), non-IPD, nasopharyngeal carriage (NPC), and antimicrobial resistance (AMR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2548 publications identified, 112 were included. Direct vaccine effectiveness against 6C IPD in children ranged between 70 and 85 % for ≥ 1 dose PCV13 (n = 3 studies), was 94 % in fully PCV13 vaccinated children (n = 2), and -14 % for ≥ 1 dose of PCV10 (n = 1). Compared to PCV7, PCV13 efficacy against 6C NPC in children was 66 % (n = 1). Serotype 6C IPD rates or NPC prevalence declined post-PCV13 in most studies in children (n = 5/6) and almost half of studies in adults (n = 5/11), while it increased post-PCV10 for IPD and non-IPD in all studies (n = 6/6). Changes in AMR prevalence were inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In contrast to PCV10, PCV13 vaccination consistently protected against 6C IPD and NPC in children, and provided some level of indirect protection to adults, supporting that serotype 6A but not 6B provides cross-protection to 6C. Vaccine policy makers and regulators should consider the effects of serotype 6A-containing PCVs against serotype 6C disease in their decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":94264,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140327591","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The early safety profile of simultaneous vaccination against influenza and Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) in patients with high-risk heart failure. 高危心力衰竭患者同时接种流感和呼吸道合胞病毒 (RSV) 疫苗的早期安全性概况。
Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.060
Jan Biegus, Leszek Szenborn, Robert Zymliński, Michał Zakliczyński, Krzysztof Reczuch, Mateusz Guzik, Szymon Urban, Marta Rosiek-Biegus, Berenika Jankowiak, Gracjan Iwanek, Marat Fudim, Piotr Ponikowski

The safety of simultaneous vaccination for Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) and influenza in vulnerable high-risk heart failure (HF) patients remains unclear. In an open-label, prospective study, 105 patients received concurrent influenza (Vaxigrip Tetra, season 2023/2024, Sanofi) and RSV (Arexvy, GSK) vaccinations from September 15th to November 17th, 2023. Adverse events were collected on the fourth-day post-vaccination. Overall, the vaccination was well tolerated, with the most common reaction being injection site pain (63 %). General symptoms occurred in 33 % of patients, predominantly fatigue (23 %), myalgia (12 %), and headache (9 %). Grade 3 reactions were observed in 6 % of patients, and a few experienced temperature elevation or flu-like symptoms, managing them with antipyretics. Notably, there were no exacerbations of HF, hospitalizations, or deaths within a week post-vaccination. This study indicates the safety of simultaneous influenza and RSV vaccination in high-risk HF patients, with a low incidence of mild adverse events.

在易感的高危心衰(HF)患者中同时接种呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)和流感疫苗的安全性仍不明确。在一项开放标签前瞻性研究中,105 名患者在 2023 年 9 月 15 日至 11 月 17 日期间同时接种了流感疫苗(Vaxigrip Tetra,2023/2024 季,赛诺菲)和 RSV 疫苗(Arexvy,葛兰素史克)。不良反应在接种后第四天收集。总体而言,接种效果良好,最常见的反应是注射部位疼痛(63%)。33%的患者出现全身症状,主要是疲劳(23%)、肌痛(12%)和头痛(9%)。6%的患者出现三级反应,少数患者出现体温升高或类似流感的症状,需要服用退烧药。值得注意的是,接种疫苗后一周内没有出现高血压加重、住院或死亡病例。这项研究表明,在高危高血压患者中同时接种流感和 RSV 疫苗是安全的,轻微不良反应的发生率很低。
{"title":"The early safety profile of simultaneous vaccination against influenza and Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) in patients with high-risk heart failure.","authors":"Jan Biegus, Leszek Szenborn, Robert Zymliński, Michał Zakliczyński, Krzysztof Reczuch, Mateusz Guzik, Szymon Urban, Marta Rosiek-Biegus, Berenika Jankowiak, Gracjan Iwanek, Marat Fudim, Piotr Ponikowski","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.060","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.060","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The safety of simultaneous vaccination for Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) and influenza in vulnerable high-risk heart failure (HF) patients remains unclear. In an open-label, prospective study, 105 patients received concurrent influenza (Vaxigrip Tetra, season 2023/2024, Sanofi) and RSV (Arexvy, GSK) vaccinations from September 15th to November 17th, 2023. Adverse events were collected on the fourth-day post-vaccination. Overall, the vaccination was well tolerated, with the most common reaction being injection site pain (63 %). General symptoms occurred in 33 % of patients, predominantly fatigue (23 %), myalgia (12 %), and headache (9 %). Grade 3 reactions were observed in 6 % of patients, and a few experienced temperature elevation or flu-like symptoms, managing them with antipyretics. Notably, there were no exacerbations of HF, hospitalizations, or deaths within a week post-vaccination. This study indicates the safety of simultaneous influenza and RSV vaccination in high-risk HF patients, with a low incidence of mild adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":94264,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140295773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Global VAX: A U.S. contribution to global COVID-19 vaccination efforts, 2021-2023. 全球 VAX:2021-2023 年美国对全球 COVID-19 疫苗接种工作的贡献。
Pub Date : 2024-03-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.054
Benjamin A Dahl, Beth Tritter, Deena Butryn, Melissa Dahlke, Sean Browning, Richard Gelting, Monica Fleming, Nancy Ortiz, Jacqueline Labrador, Ryan Novak, David Fitter, Elizabeth Bell, Megan McGuire, Robert Rosenbaum, Robert Pulwer, Jolene Wun, Anna McCaffrey, Maisoon Chowdhury, Nida Parks, Marc Cunningham, Anthony Mounts, Dora Curry, Dominique Richardson, Gavin Grant

In December 2021 the U.S. Government announced a new, whole-of-government $1.8 billion effort, the Initiative for Global Vaccine Access (Global VAX) in response to the global COVID-19 pandemic. Using the foundation of decades of U.S. government investments in global health and working in close partnership with local governments and key global and multilateral organizations, Global VAX enabled the rapid acceleration of the global COVID-19 vaccine rollout in selected countries, contributing to increased COVID-19 vaccine coverage in some of the world's most vulnerable communities. Through Global VAX, the U.S. Government has supported 125 countries to scale up COVID-19 vaccine delivery and administration while strengthening primary health care systems to respond to future health crises. The progress made by Global VAX has paved the way for a stronger global recovery and improved global health security.

2021 年 12 月,美国政府宣布了一项耗资 18 亿美元的全新政府整体行动--全球疫苗普及行动(Global VAX),以应对全球 COVID-19 大流行。利用美国政府数十年来在全球健康领域的投资基础,并与当地政府及主要全球和多边组织密切合作,全球 VAX 在选定的国家迅速加快了 COVID-19 疫苗的全球推广,从而提高了 COVID-19 疫苗在世界上一些最脆弱社区的覆盖率。通过全球 VAX,美国政府支持 125 个国家扩大了 COVID-19 疫苗的交付和管理,同时加强了初级卫生保健系统,以应对未来的卫生危机。全球 VAX 计划所取得的进展为全球更强劲的复苏和更好的全球健康安全铺平了道路。
{"title":"Global VAX: A U.S. contribution to global COVID-19 vaccination efforts, 2021-2023.","authors":"Benjamin A Dahl, Beth Tritter, Deena Butryn, Melissa Dahlke, Sean Browning, Richard Gelting, Monica Fleming, Nancy Ortiz, Jacqueline Labrador, Ryan Novak, David Fitter, Elizabeth Bell, Megan McGuire, Robert Rosenbaum, Robert Pulwer, Jolene Wun, Anna McCaffrey, Maisoon Chowdhury, Nida Parks, Marc Cunningham, Anthony Mounts, Dora Curry, Dominique Richardson, Gavin Grant","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.054","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.054","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In December 2021 the U.S. Government announced a new, whole-of-government $1.8 billion effort, the Initiative for Global Vaccine Access (Global VAX) in response to the global COVID-19 pandemic. Using the foundation of decades of U.S. government investments in global health and working in close partnership with local governments and key global and multilateral organizations, Global VAX enabled the rapid acceleration of the global COVID-19 vaccine rollout in selected countries, contributing to increased COVID-19 vaccine coverage in some of the world's most vulnerable communities. Through Global VAX, the U.S. Government has supported 125 countries to scale up COVID-19 vaccine delivery and administration while strengthening primary health care systems to respond to future health crises. The progress made by Global VAX has paved the way for a stronger global recovery and improved global health security.</p>","PeriodicalId":94264,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11417132/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140208768","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is vaccination against measles, mumps, and rubella associated with reduced rates of antibiotic treatments among children below the age of 2 years? Nationwide register-based study from Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. 接种麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹疫苗是否会降低 2 岁以下儿童的抗生素治疗率?来自丹麦、芬兰、挪威和瑞典的全国性登记研究。
Pub Date : 2024-03-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.026
Lise Gehrt, Hélène Englund, Ida Laake, Heta Nieminen, Sören Möller, Berit Feiring, Mika Lahdenkari, Lill Trogstad, Christine Stabell Benn, Signe Sørup

Objectives: Previous studies have shown that vaccination against measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) may have beneficial non-specific effects, reducing the risk of infections not targeted by the vaccine. We investigated if MMR vaccine given after the third dose of diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP3), was associated with reduced rates of antibiotic treatments.

Methods: Register-based cohort study following children from the age of recommended MMR vaccination until age 2 years. We included 831,287 children born in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden who had received DTaP3 but not yet MMR vaccine. Cox proportional hazards regression with age as the underlying timescale and vaccination status as a time-varying exposure was used to estimate covariate-adjusted Hazard Ratios (aHRs) and inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) HRs of antibiotic treatments. Summary estimates were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis.

Results: Compared with only having received DTaP3, receipt of MMR vaccine after DTaP3 was associated with reduced rates of antibiotic treatments in all countries: the aHR was 0.92 (0.91-0.93) in Denmark, 0.92 (0.90-0.94) in Finland, 0.84 (0.82-0.85) in Norway, and 0.87 (0.85-0.90) in Sweden, yielding a summary estimate of 0.89 (0.85-0.93). A stronger beneficial association was seen in a negative control exposure analysis comparing children vaccinated with DTaP3 vs two doses of DTaP.

Conclusions: Across the Nordic countries, receipt of MMR vaccine after DTaP3 was associated with an 11% lower rate of antibiotic treatments. The negative control analysis suggests that the findings are affected by residual confounding. Findings suggest that potential non-specific effects of MMR vaccine are of limited clinical and public health importance for the milder infections treated out-of-hospital in the Nordic setting.

目的:以往的研究表明,接种麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹(MMR)疫苗可能会产生有益的非特异性效果,降低疫苗未针对的感染风险。我们研究了在接种第三剂白喉-破伤风-百日咳疫苗(DTaP3)后接种麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹疫苗是否与降低抗生素治疗率有关:以登记为基础的队列研究,从推荐接种麻风腮疫苗的年龄开始跟踪儿童,直至其 2 岁。我们纳入了 831,287 名出生在丹麦、芬兰、挪威和瑞典、接种过 DTaP3 而未接种过麻风腮疫苗的儿童。我们采用以年龄为基本时间尺度、疫苗接种状况为时变暴露的 Cox 比例危险度回归来估算协变量调整后的危险比 (aHR) 和抗生素治疗的逆治疗加权 (IPTW) 危险比。采用随机效应荟萃分析法计算了汇总估计值:在所有国家,与只接种过 DTaP3 相比,接种 DTaP3 后接种麻腮风疫苗与抗生素治疗率降低有关:丹麦的 aHR 为 0.92(0.91-0.93),芬兰为 0.92(0.90-0.94),挪威为 0.84(0.82-0.85),瑞典为 0.87(0.85-0.90),得出的总估计值为 0.89(0.85-0.93)。在对接种DTaP3与接种两剂DTaP的儿童进行的阴性对照暴露分析中,发现了更强的有益关联:结论:在整个北欧国家,接种DTaP3后接种麻腮风疫苗与抗生素治疗率降低11%有关。阴性对照分析表明,研究结果受到了残余混杂因素的影响。研究结果表明,接种麻腮风疫苗的潜在非特异性效应对北欧院外治疗的轻度感染的临床和公共卫生意义有限。
{"title":"Is vaccination against measles, mumps, and rubella associated with reduced rates of antibiotic treatments among children below the age of 2 years? Nationwide register-based study from Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden.","authors":"Lise Gehrt, Hélène Englund, Ida Laake, Heta Nieminen, Sören Möller, Berit Feiring, Mika Lahdenkari, Lill Trogstad, Christine Stabell Benn, Signe Sørup","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.026","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Previous studies have shown that vaccination against measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) may have beneficial non-specific effects, reducing the risk of infections not targeted by the vaccine. We investigated if MMR vaccine given after the third dose of diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP3), was associated with reduced rates of antibiotic treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Register-based cohort study following children from the age of recommended MMR vaccination until age 2 years. We included 831,287 children born in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden who had received DTaP3 but not yet MMR vaccine. Cox proportional hazards regression with age as the underlying timescale and vaccination status as a time-varying exposure was used to estimate covariate-adjusted Hazard Ratios (aHRs) and inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) HRs of antibiotic treatments. Summary estimates were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with only having received DTaP3, receipt of MMR vaccine after DTaP3 was associated with reduced rates of antibiotic treatments in all countries: the aHR was 0.92 (0.91-0.93) in Denmark, 0.92 (0.90-0.94) in Finland, 0.84 (0.82-0.85) in Norway, and 0.87 (0.85-0.90) in Sweden, yielding a summary estimate of 0.89 (0.85-0.93). A stronger beneficial association was seen in a negative control exposure analysis comparing children vaccinated with DTaP3 vs two doses of DTaP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Across the Nordic countries, receipt of MMR vaccine after DTaP3 was associated with an 11% lower rate of antibiotic treatments. The negative control analysis suggests that the findings are affected by residual confounding. Findings suggest that potential non-specific effects of MMR vaccine are of limited clinical and public health importance for the milder infections treated out-of-hospital in the Nordic setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":94264,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140178492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
WITHDRAWN: PIRES2-EGFP/CTB-UreI vaccination activated a mixed Th1/Th2/Th17 immune system defense towards Helicobacter pylori infection in the BALB/c mice model. 在 BALB/c 小鼠模型中,接种 PIRES2-EGFP/CTB-UreI 疫苗可激活 Th1/Th2/Th17 混合免疫系统防御幽门螺旋杆菌感染。
Pub Date : 2024-03-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.02.050
Sana Ghasemifar, Omid Chabak, Tohid Piri-Gharaghie, Abbas Doosti

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the Editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal. The data presented in the manuscript was deemed severely flawed after appearing online as an Article in Press. The scientific community raised concerns about the methodology (including but not limited to major technical issues) used in the study and the subsequent conclusions drawn from the presented experiments. After careful investigation, the Vaccine editorial office concluded that the data in the publication was indeed severely flawed and that the concerns raised by the scientific community were valid. Therefore, the journal editors decided to withdraw the article and sincerely apologize for any inconvenience caused.

人类胃炎、胃溃疡、远端胃癌和胃黏膜淋巴瘤的发生与幽门螺旋杆菌(H. pylori)密切相关。由于抗生素耐药性日益普遍,接种疫苗是一种有效的预防措施。融合疫苗接种是一种潜在的实用方法。本研究将霍乱毒素 B 亚基(CTB)与抗原性幽门螺杆菌尿素酶 I 亚基(CTB-UreI)结合,制成了一种融合疫苗。CTB-UreI DNA疫苗被化学克隆到pIRES2-EGFP中,并通过PCR和限制性酶消化验证了克隆的成功。对 CTB-UreI 在大肠杆菌 BL21(DE3) 中的诱导进行了研究。在 BALB/c 小鼠中评估了疫苗的免疫原性和免疫保护效力。Western 印迹检测成功确定了 CTB-UreI 的活化。相比之下,接种 pIRES2-EGFP/CTB-UreI 疫苗的 BALB/c 小鼠血液样本中的 IgG、IgA、IFN-γ、IL-4 和 IL-17 水平更高。此外,胃损伤和细菌负荷也有所减少。此外,接种了 pIRES2-EGFP/CTB-UreI 的 BALB/c 小鼠对幽门螺杆菌的挑战表现出了高水平的免疫力(100%)。pIRES2-EGFP/CTB-UreI引起了Th1/Th2/Th17组合免疫反应,可能有助于形成有效的防御机制。我们的数据表明,使用这种融合疫苗预防幽门螺杆菌感染是一种很有前景的选择。
{"title":"WITHDRAWN: PIRES2-EGFP/CTB-UreI vaccination activated a mixed Th1/Th2/Th17 immune system defense towards Helicobacter pylori infection in the BALB/c mice model.","authors":"Sana Ghasemifar, Omid Chabak, Tohid Piri-Gharaghie, Abbas Doosti","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.02.050","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.02.050","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article has been withdrawn at the request of the Editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal. The data presented in the manuscript was deemed severely flawed after appearing online as an Article in Press. The scientific community raised concerns about the methodology (including but not limited to major technical issues) used in the study and the subsequent conclusions drawn from the presented experiments. After careful investigation, the Vaccine editorial office concluded that the data in the publication was indeed severely flawed and that the concerns raised by the scientific community were valid. Therefore, the journal editors decided to withdraw the article and sincerely apologize for any inconvenience caused.</p>","PeriodicalId":94264,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140061679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
An overview of the COVID-19 pediatric vaccine program - The U.S. experience vaccinating children ages 6 months through 17 years. COVID-19 儿童疫苗计划概述 - 美国为 6 个月至 17 岁儿童接种疫苗的经验。
Pub Date : 2024-02-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.02.019
Kevin Chatham-Stephens, Rosalind J Carter, Chris Duggar, Kate R Woodworth, Catherine Amanda Carnes, Achal Bhatt, Christina Ottis, Chris Voegeli, Shannon Stokley, Tara Vogt

COVID-19 vaccination decreases risk for COVID-19 illness and severe disease in children, including multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C) and death. On December 13, 2020, CDC recommended COVID-19 vaccination for persons ages ≥16 years, with expansion on May 12, 2021, to adolescents ages 12-15 years; to children ages 5-11 years on November 2, 2021; and to children ages 6 months-4 years on June 18, 2022. Following each age-specific recommendation, the U.S. government collaborated with state and local governments, vaccine manufacturers, and numerous other public and private entities, to ensure rapid, broad, and equitable COVID-19 vaccine distribution to strategic locations across the country to maximize access. However, vaccination coverage among children has been lower than among adults and lower among younger children than adolescents. As of May 10, 2023, COVID-19 primary series vaccination coverage was 61.8% among U.S. children ages 12-17 years, 32.9% among those ages 5-11 years, and 5.5% among those ages 6 months-4 years. This manuscript describes the planning and implementation of the U.S. COVID-19 pediatric vaccine program, including successes (e.g., the availability of pharmacy vaccination to extend access beyond more traditional pediatric vaccine providers) and challenges (e.g., multi-dose vaccine vials instead of single-dose vials, leading to concerns about wastage) to provide a historical record of the program and to help inform planning and implementation of future routine or pandemic-related pediatric vaccination campaigns.

接种 COVID-19 疫苗可降低儿童患 COVID-19 疾病和严重疾病的风险,包括多系统炎症综合征 (MIS-C) 和死亡。2020 年 12 月 13 日,美国疾病预防控制中心建议年龄≥16 岁者接种 COVID-19 疫苗,2021 年 5 月 12 日扩大到 12-15 岁青少年;2021 年 11 月 2 日扩大到 5-11 岁儿童;2022 年 6 月 18 日扩大到 6 个月至 4 岁儿童。根据每个特定年龄段的建议,美国政府与各州和地方政府、疫苗生产商以及众多其他公共和私营实体合作,确保 COVID-19 疫苗快速、广泛、公平地分发到全国各地的战略要地,以最大限度地提高接种率。然而,儿童的疫苗接种率一直低于成人,低龄儿童的接种率也低于青少年。截至 2023 年 5 月 10 日,美国 12-17 岁儿童的 COVID-19 主要系列疫苗接种率为 61.8%,5-11 岁儿童为 32.9%,6 个月-4 岁儿童为 5.5%。本手稿介绍了美国 COVID-19 儿科疫苗计划的规划和实施情况,包括成功之处(如提供药房接种,将接种范围扩大到传统儿科疫苗提供者之外)和挑战(如多剂量疫苗瓶代替单剂量疫苗瓶,导致浪费问题),以提供该计划的历史记录,并为未来常规或大流行相关儿科疫苗接种活动的规划和实施提供参考。
{"title":"An overview of the COVID-19 pediatric vaccine program - The U.S. experience vaccinating children ages 6 months through 17 years.","authors":"Kevin Chatham-Stephens, Rosalind J Carter, Chris Duggar, Kate R Woodworth, Catherine Amanda Carnes, Achal Bhatt, Christina Ottis, Chris Voegeli, Shannon Stokley, Tara Vogt","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.02.019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.02.019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>COVID-19 vaccination decreases risk for COVID-19 illness and severe disease in children, including multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C) and death. On December 13, 2020, CDC recommended COVID-19 vaccination for persons ages ≥16 years, with expansion on May 12, 2021, to adolescents ages 12-15 years; to children ages 5-11 years on November 2, 2021; and to children ages 6 months-4 years on June 18, 2022. Following each age-specific recommendation, the U.S. government collaborated with state and local governments, vaccine manufacturers, and numerous other public and private entities, to ensure rapid, broad, and equitable COVID-19 vaccine distribution to strategic locations across the country to maximize access. However, vaccination coverage among children has been lower than among adults and lower among younger children than adolescents. As of May 10, 2023, COVID-19 primary series vaccination coverage was 61.8% among U.S. children ages 12-17 years, 32.9% among those ages 5-11 years, and 5.5% among those ages 6 months-4 years. This manuscript describes the planning and implementation of the U.S. COVID-19 pediatric vaccine program, including successes (e.g., the availability of pharmacy vaccination to extend access beyond more traditional pediatric vaccine providers) and challenges (e.g., multi-dose vaccine vials instead of single-dose vials, leading to concerns about wastage) to provide a historical record of the program and to help inform planning and implementation of future routine or pandemic-related pediatric vaccination campaigns.</p>","PeriodicalId":94264,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140013887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Vaccine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1