Pub Date : 2025-12-01eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20543581251394082
Arrti A Bhasin, Stephanie N Dixon, Lavanya Bathini, Nivethika Jeyakumar, Lima F Rodrigues, Yuguang Kang, Peter G Blake, Amit X Garg, Michelle A Hladunewich
Purpose of program: In 2018, Ontario Health (Ontario Renal Network) established a new multidisciplinary model of glomerulonephritis care to be available to all 27 Regional Renal Programs. This model of care was designed to fill existing gaps and ensure individuals with glomerulonephritis access to standardized, timely, and high-quality treatment close to home. This report describes the characteristics of individuals who received this care since it was established.
Sources of information: Provincial administrative health care databases.
Methods: This is a descriptive study of the characteristics of adults with a registered glomerulonephritis visit provided by a multidisciplinary care team in Ontario, Canada between April 1, 2019, and March 31, 2023. Individuals were excluded if they had evidence of a kidney transplant prior to their first registered visit.
Key findings: A total of 6,926 individuals were included in the cohort. Every year since 2019, approximately 1,200 new individuals had a registered multidisciplinary visit. IgA nephropathy was the most common reported diagnosis at the first registered visit (1,407 of 6,926 [20.5%]). Over a median follow-up period of 2.7 years (interquartile range = 1.3-3.7) since their first registered visit, 420 individuals (6%) received kidney replacement therapy (maintenance dialysis or kidney transplant).
Limitations: This description of individuals with registered visits underestimates the true prevalence of adults with glomerulonephritis in Ontario, as it does not capture those who did not register or who received more advanced disease management in other settings.
Implications: The use of a new model of multidisciplinary glomerulonephritis care in Ontario, Canada is becoming well established. Ongoing analysis of administrative data will guide future healthcare planning and delivery.
{"title":"A New Multidisciplinary Model of Glomerulonephritis Care in Ontario: A Descriptive Program Report.","authors":"Arrti A Bhasin, Stephanie N Dixon, Lavanya Bathini, Nivethika Jeyakumar, Lima F Rodrigues, Yuguang Kang, Peter G Blake, Amit X Garg, Michelle A Hladunewich","doi":"10.1177/20543581251394082","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20543581251394082","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of program: </strong>In 2018, Ontario Health (Ontario Renal Network) established a new multidisciplinary model of glomerulonephritis care to be available to all 27 Regional Renal Programs. This model of care was designed to fill existing gaps and ensure individuals with glomerulonephritis access to standardized, timely, and high-quality treatment close to home. This report describes the characteristics of individuals who received this care since it was established.</p><p><strong>Sources of information: </strong>Provincial administrative health care databases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a descriptive study of the characteristics of adults with a registered glomerulonephritis visit provided by a multidisciplinary care team in Ontario, Canada between April 1, 2019, and March 31, 2023. Individuals were excluded if they had evidence of a kidney transplant prior to their first registered visit.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>A total of 6,926 individuals were included in the cohort. Every year since 2019, approximately 1,200 new individuals had a registered multidisciplinary visit. IgA nephropathy was the most common reported diagnosis at the first registered visit (1,407 of 6,926 [20.5%]). Over a median follow-up period of 2.7 years (interquartile range = 1.3-3.7) since their first registered visit, 420 individuals (6%) received kidney replacement therapy (maintenance dialysis or kidney transplant).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This description of individuals with registered visits underestimates the true prevalence of adults with glomerulonephritis in Ontario, as it does not capture those who did not register or who received more advanced disease management in other settings.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The use of a new model of multidisciplinary glomerulonephritis care in Ontario, Canada is becoming well established. Ongoing analysis of administrative data will guide future healthcare planning and delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"12 ","pages":"20543581251394082"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12669530/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145667204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-30eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20543581251393436
Angelina Abbaticchio, Madeline Theodorlis, Michelle S Cross, Abhijat Kitchlu, Jo-Anne Wilson, Laura Sills, Nairne Scott-Douglas, Elena Qirjazi, Marcello Tonelli, Alexandra DeBusschere, Jenny Wichart, Kimberly Defoe, Jennifer M MacRae, Caroline E Stigant, Dan J Martinusen, Alison J Cheung, Marisa Battistella
<p><strong>Background: </strong>People undergoing hemodialysis (HD) take an average of 12 medications daily, with 93% prescribed at least one potentially inappropriate medication or dose. Polypharmacy is commonly defined as taking 5 or more medications per day; however, it can also refer to the use of inappropriate medication choices and doses. Polypharmacy can lead to serious health consequences, including drug-drug interactions, falls, and hospitalizations. Deprescribing, the process of stopping or gradually reducing the dose of a medication that may be causing harm or offers no benefit, can reduce polypharmacy among older adults. However, little research focuses on deprescribing in the HD population, and few tools exist to support deprescribing in HD. To address this gap, we developed and validated the STrategic Optimization of Medication Use in Patients on HemoDialysis (STOPMed-HD) intervention, a deprescribing toolkit which includes clinician-focused algorithms, monitoring forms, and evidence tables, and patient-facing information bulletins and videos. Co-developed with clinicians and patients, the toolkit reflects patient priorities and aligns with their deprescribing goals. This report describes the implementation and evaluation strategy of the STOPMed-HD intervention at 4 HD sites across Canada, and presents insights into barriers, facilitators, and key considerations for implementation.</p><p><strong>Knowledge mobilization and implementation methods: </strong>Our knowledge mobilization and implementation strategy involves a collaborative approach to implement the evidence-based deprescribing toolkit. Our strategy prioritizes engagement with several key partners, including patients and clinicians, to support implementation and foster a culture of deprescribing within HD units across Canada. Clinician buy-in at participating sites was established during toolkit development, and we continue to support clinicians throughout implementation at their respective HD units. Diverse patient partners have been actively involved since the inception of the study, and ongoing patient engagement remains central. To explore facilitators and barriers to uptake, we conducted interviews with patients and clinicians who participated in the 6-month deprescribing intervention at the Toronto site. Interviews at other sites will be completed in the coming months. The RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework guided our data collection and analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Key findings and implementation considerations: </strong>The 6-month deprescribing intervention has been implemented in Toronto, ON; Halifax, NS; Calgary, AB; and Victoria, BC. This report includes key barriers and facilitators identified from the Toronto site. Patient-level barriers include fear of withdrawal, medication dependence, disengagement, and lack of follow-up support, while facilitators include clear messaging about deprescribing and regular mo
{"title":"Clinical Integration and Evaluation of the STrategic Optimization of Prescription Medication Use in Patients on HemoDialysis (STOPMed-HD) Intervention.","authors":"Angelina Abbaticchio, Madeline Theodorlis, Michelle S Cross, Abhijat Kitchlu, Jo-Anne Wilson, Laura Sills, Nairne Scott-Douglas, Elena Qirjazi, Marcello Tonelli, Alexandra DeBusschere, Jenny Wichart, Kimberly Defoe, Jennifer M MacRae, Caroline E Stigant, Dan J Martinusen, Alison J Cheung, Marisa Battistella","doi":"10.1177/20543581251393436","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20543581251393436","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People undergoing hemodialysis (HD) take an average of 12 medications daily, with 93% prescribed at least one potentially inappropriate medication or dose. Polypharmacy is commonly defined as taking 5 or more medications per day; however, it can also refer to the use of inappropriate medication choices and doses. Polypharmacy can lead to serious health consequences, including drug-drug interactions, falls, and hospitalizations. Deprescribing, the process of stopping or gradually reducing the dose of a medication that may be causing harm or offers no benefit, can reduce polypharmacy among older adults. However, little research focuses on deprescribing in the HD population, and few tools exist to support deprescribing in HD. To address this gap, we developed and validated the STrategic Optimization of Medication Use in Patients on HemoDialysis (STOPMed-HD) intervention, a deprescribing toolkit which includes clinician-focused algorithms, monitoring forms, and evidence tables, and patient-facing information bulletins and videos. Co-developed with clinicians and patients, the toolkit reflects patient priorities and aligns with their deprescribing goals. This report describes the implementation and evaluation strategy of the STOPMed-HD intervention at 4 HD sites across Canada, and presents insights into barriers, facilitators, and key considerations for implementation.</p><p><strong>Knowledge mobilization and implementation methods: </strong>Our knowledge mobilization and implementation strategy involves a collaborative approach to implement the evidence-based deprescribing toolkit. Our strategy prioritizes engagement with several key partners, including patients and clinicians, to support implementation and foster a culture of deprescribing within HD units across Canada. Clinician buy-in at participating sites was established during toolkit development, and we continue to support clinicians throughout implementation at their respective HD units. Diverse patient partners have been actively involved since the inception of the study, and ongoing patient engagement remains central. To explore facilitators and barriers to uptake, we conducted interviews with patients and clinicians who participated in the 6-month deprescribing intervention at the Toronto site. Interviews at other sites will be completed in the coming months. The RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework guided our data collection and analysis approach.</p><p><strong>Key findings and implementation considerations: </strong>The 6-month deprescribing intervention has been implemented in Toronto, ON; Halifax, NS; Calgary, AB; and Victoria, BC. This report includes key barriers and facilitators identified from the Toronto site. Patient-level barriers include fear of withdrawal, medication dependence, disengagement, and lack of follow-up support, while facilitators include clear messaging about deprescribing and regular mo","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"12 ","pages":"20543581251393436"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12665828/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145660486","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-30eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20543581251366752
Sheldon W Tobe, Raea Dobson
Desmopressin is a vasopressin analogue. In addition to its antidiuretic effects, it is also a procoagulant. While it is indicated to reduce bleeding in a variety of situations, it is not currently being utilized broadly for kidney biopsies, a procedure where bleeding is the most common complication.
Purpose of review: To discuss the evidence surrounding use of desmopressin for kidney biopsy.
Sources of information: We conducted a search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CENTRAL (Wiley), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (Ovid), and Scopus databases.
Methods: All identified trials were reviewed. Trials since the last systematic review in 2020 were organized in color-coded tables by efficacy, neutral results, or harm.
Key findings: Studies are generally favorable in terms of efficacy data for reduced bleeding during kidney biopsies, with some safety concerns. More studies are still needed, but we believe desmopressin can be justified to reduce bleeding complications of kidney biopsy in the setting of chronic kidney disease (CKD).
Limitations: Trials involved small sample sizes, single-center data, and were largely observational in nature.
{"title":"The Role of Desmopressin in Kidney Biopsies: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Sheldon W Tobe, Raea Dobson","doi":"10.1177/20543581251366752","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20543581251366752","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Desmopressin is a vasopressin analogue. In addition to its antidiuretic effects, it is also a procoagulant. While it is indicated to reduce bleeding in a variety of situations, it is not currently being utilized broadly for kidney biopsies, a procedure where bleeding is the most common complication.</p><p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To discuss the evidence surrounding use of desmopressin for kidney biopsy.</p><p><strong>Sources of information: </strong>We conducted a search of MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CENTRAL (Wiley), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (Ovid), and Scopus databases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All identified trials were reviewed. Trials since the last systematic review in 2020 were organized in color-coded tables by efficacy, neutral results, or harm.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Studies are generally favorable in terms of efficacy data for reduced bleeding during kidney biopsies, with some safety concerns. More studies are still needed, but we believe desmopressin can be justified to reduce bleeding complications of kidney biopsy in the setting of chronic kidney disease (CKD).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Trials involved small sample sizes, single-center data, and were largely observational in nature.</p>","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"12 ","pages":"20543581251366752"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12665823/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145660410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-23eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20543581251394909
Abhilash Koratala, Gregorio Romero-González, Amir Kazory
{"title":"Contextualizing POCUS Findings in Heart Failure: Cautions and Considerations for Nephrologists.","authors":"Abhilash Koratala, Gregorio Romero-González, Amir Kazory","doi":"10.1177/20543581251394909","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20543581251394909","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"12 ","pages":"20543581251394909"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12644433/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145630155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-20eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20543581251391277
Shaifali Sandal, Saly El Wazze, Caroline E Stigant, Terri Chanda, Wa David Berry, Isabelle Ethier, Kristen Pederson, Neil Finkle, Ratna Samanta, Michael Gagnon, Tamara Glavinovic, Drew Hager, Jay Hingwala, Matthew Hunt, Seychelle Yohanna, Jennifer M McRae, Naomi Martens, Laura Horowitz, Catherine Weber, Sarah Thomas
{"title":"From Risk and Vulnerability to Preparedness and Resiliency: An Opinion Piece on Championing Disaster and Emergency Risk Reduction and Management in Kidney Care.","authors":"Shaifali Sandal, Saly El Wazze, Caroline E Stigant, Terri Chanda, Wa David Berry, Isabelle Ethier, Kristen Pederson, Neil Finkle, Ratna Samanta, Michael Gagnon, Tamara Glavinovic, Drew Hager, Jay Hingwala, Matthew Hunt, Seychelle Yohanna, Jennifer M McRae, Naomi Martens, Laura Horowitz, Catherine Weber, Sarah Thomas","doi":"10.1177/20543581251391277","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20543581251391277","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"12 ","pages":"20543581251391277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12638735/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145585940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-18eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20543581251389071
Alexander Messina, Noémie Laurier, Amély Popescu, Antoine Przybylak-Brouillard, Jorane-Tiana Robert, Alexander Tom, Sara Wing, Marcelo Cantarovich, Ahsan Alam, Rita S Suri, Emilie Trinh
Background: The process for kidney transplant listing is often lengthy and fragmented, contributing to delayed access to transplantation.
Objective: At our center, we aimed to reduce time to listing by 25% within 12 months through a quality improvement (QI) initiative.
Design: We conducted a mixed-method QI study.
Setting: Tertiary care academic transplant center.
Participants: Adult patients listed for transplantation from January 1, 2019, to July 31, 2023.
Methods: Quantitative data were collected through chart review and qualitative data were gathered from semi-structured interviews with health care providers. Outcome measure was time from evaluation start to transplant listing and process measures included time to obtaining specific consultations and tests. Findings informed a multifaceted intervention, which included (1) improved documentation guidelines, (2) expedited access for delayed investigations, (3) a dedicated transplant nurse for Indigenous patients, and (4) an informatic-enabled coordination tool. Outcomes were then compared to those of patients listed from January 1 to July 31, 2024.
Results: Among 109 patients in the preintervention cohort, the median time from evaluation to listing was 437 days, with only 9 patients listed predialysis. Indigenous patients, who represent over 25% of our population, accounted for only 11% of those listed. Key delays were identified in cardiology testing, colonoscopies, and mammograms. Ten health care providers were interviewed, and the main themes identified were: lack of resources, confusing task responsibilities, coordination of informatic systems and inequities affecting Indigenous patients. Following preliminary interventions, 22 patients were listed for transplant in just over 6 months-nearly one fifth of the total listed over the prior 4 years-demonstrating a marked acceleration in the listing process. Furthermore, median time to listing improved by 17% to 362 days, with a higher proportion of Indigenous patients (23%) listed and modest reductions in cardiology-related delays. Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles continue to optimize these interventions.
Limitations: Conducted at a single center which limits the generalizability of findings to other health care centers. Furthermore, the timeline included the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have caused delays and influenced results independent of the QI initiative.
Conclusions: A multifaceted intervention addressing local challenges showed early signs of success in reducing time to transplant listing and improving access for Indigenous patients. This highlights the critical role of data-driven QI initiatives in optimizing processes and improving patient care.
{"title":"Improving Time to Kidney Transplant Listing: A Single Center Quality Improvement Initiative.","authors":"Alexander Messina, Noémie Laurier, Amély Popescu, Antoine Przybylak-Brouillard, Jorane-Tiana Robert, Alexander Tom, Sara Wing, Marcelo Cantarovich, Ahsan Alam, Rita S Suri, Emilie Trinh","doi":"10.1177/20543581251389071","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20543581251389071","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The process for kidney transplant listing is often lengthy and fragmented, contributing to delayed access to transplantation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>At our center, we aimed to reduce time to listing by 25% within 12 months through a quality improvement (QI) initiative.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a mixed-method QI study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary care academic transplant center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adult patients listed for transplantation from January 1, 2019, to July 31, 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Quantitative data were collected through chart review and qualitative data were gathered from semi-structured interviews with health care providers. Outcome measure was time from evaluation start to transplant listing and process measures included time to obtaining specific consultations and tests. Findings informed a multifaceted intervention, which included (1) improved documentation guidelines, (2) expedited access for delayed investigations, (3) a dedicated transplant nurse for Indigenous patients, and (4) an informatic-enabled coordination tool. Outcomes were then compared to those of patients listed from January 1 to July 31, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 109 patients in the preintervention cohort, the median time from evaluation to listing was 437 days, with only 9 patients listed predialysis. Indigenous patients, who represent over 25% of our population, accounted for only 11% of those listed. Key delays were identified in cardiology testing, colonoscopies, and mammograms. Ten health care providers were interviewed, and the main themes identified were: lack of resources, confusing task responsibilities, coordination of informatic systems and inequities affecting Indigenous patients. Following preliminary interventions, 22 patients were listed for transplant in just over 6 months-nearly one fifth of the total listed over the prior 4 years-demonstrating a marked acceleration in the listing process. Furthermore, median time to listing improved by 17% to 362 days, with a higher proportion of Indigenous patients (23%) listed and modest reductions in cardiology-related delays. Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles continue to optimize these interventions.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Conducted at a single center which limits the generalizability of findings to other health care centers. Furthermore, the timeline included the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have caused delays and influenced results independent of the QI initiative.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A multifaceted intervention addressing local challenges showed early signs of success in reducing time to transplant listing and improving access for Indigenous patients. This highlights the critical role of data-driven QI initiatives in optimizing processes and improving patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"12 ","pages":"20543581251389071"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12627381/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145562842","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-10eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20543581251378793
Tony Fang, Mohammad Azfar Qureshi, Sara S Jdiaa, Abdelhamid Aboghanem, Klement Yeung, Mohamed Saad, Muhammad Abdur Razzak, Arifuddin Saad Mohammed, Raheel Ahmed, Almouhannad Alkurdi, Kendrix Kek, Eno Hysi, Alireza Zahirieh, Darren A Yuen, Ann Young
Background: Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has become increasingly integrated into routine clinical care, though its adoption in nephrology remains limited.
Objective: This pilot study evaluated a program to train nephrology fellows to perform POCUS to detect small kidney size and hydronephrosis.
Design and setting: We performed a quality improvement initiative at a single academic center (St. Michael's Hospital).
Patients: 63 patients were included.
Measurements: Pre- and post-workshop surveys assessed trainees' comfort level with kidney POCUS imaging. Patient satisfaction was also measured using a questionnaire. Time to kidney imaging, radiologic diagnosis and kidney POCUS diagnostic accuracy were also assessed.
Methods: Nephrology fellows participated in two 1-hour workshops featuring didactic and hands-on training using POCUS machines, after which they scanned hospitalized patients.
Results: Sixty-two native kidneys and 32 transplant kidneys were scanned. Patient surveys indicated high satisfaction with POCUS, with 71% preferring bedside ultrasound in future care. Trainee confidence with using POCUS improved post-workshop. Trainee-performed POCUS demonstrated a specificity of 1.00 (95% CI 0.94-1.00) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.80-1.00) for the detection of hydronephrosis in native and transplant kidneys, respectively. Nephrology trainees demonstrated a specificity of 0.75 (95% CI 0.53-0.90) [left native kidneys], 0.81 (95% CI 0.61-0.93) [right native kidneys] and 0.97 (95% CI 0.84-1.00) [transplant kidneys] for the detection of small kidney size.
Limitations: The prevalence of hydronephrosis and small kidneys was too low in this pilot study to draw conclusions about sensitivity. Additionally, a majority of the kidneys underwent POCUS imaging after an ultrasound had been performed in the medical imaging department.
Conclusions: Despite the increasing demand for POCUS training in nephrology, a significant gap persists in its clinical integration. Our study demonstrates that a structured workshop improves trainee confidence in kidney POCUS, with high patient satisfaction. Preliminary findings suggest that nephrology fellow-performed POCUS is feasible and promising, though further large-scale studies are needed to validate its clinical utility.
背景:点超声(POCUS)已越来越多地纳入常规临床护理,尽管其在肾脏病学中的应用仍然有限。目的:本初步研究评估了一项培训肾脏病研究员进行POCUS检查小肾和肾积水的计划。设计和环境:我们在一个单一的学术中心(St. Michael's Hospital)实施了质量改进计划。患者:纳入63例患者。测量方法:培训前和培训后的调查评估了受训者对肾脏POCUS成像的舒适度。患者满意度也通过问卷进行测量。评估肾脏影像学时间、放射学诊断和肾脏POCUS诊断的准确性。方法:肾脏病研究员参加了两个1小时的研讨会,主要是使用POCUS机器进行教学和实践培训,之后他们对住院患者进行扫描。结果:扫描了62个原生肾和32个移植肾。患者调查显示POCUS的满意度很高,71%的患者在未来的护理中更喜欢床边超声。培训后学员对使用POCUS的信心有所提高。实习生进行的POCUS检测原生肾和移植肾肾积水的特异性分别为1.00 (95% CI 0.94-1.00)和0.96 (95% CI 0.80-1.00)。肾脏学培训生对小肾的特异性为:左肾0.75 (95% CI 0.53-0.90),右肾0.81 (95% CI 0.61-0.93),移植肾0.97 (95% CI 0.84-1.00)。局限性:在这项初步研究中,肾积水和小肾的患病率太低,无法得出有关敏感性的结论。此外,大多数肾脏在医学影像科超声检查后接受POCUS成像。结论:尽管对肾内科POCUS培训的需求不断增加,但在临床整合方面仍存在显著差距。我们的研究表明,一个结构化的研讨会提高了实习生对肾脏POCUS的信心,患者满意度很高。初步研究结果表明,肾内科同行进行POCUS是可行的和有希望的,尽管需要进一步的大规模研究来验证其临床应用。
{"title":"Development and Evaluation of a Kidney Point-Of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) Training Program for Nephrology Fellows: A Quality Improvement Study.","authors":"Tony Fang, Mohammad Azfar Qureshi, Sara S Jdiaa, Abdelhamid Aboghanem, Klement Yeung, Mohamed Saad, Muhammad Abdur Razzak, Arifuddin Saad Mohammed, Raheel Ahmed, Almouhannad Alkurdi, Kendrix Kek, Eno Hysi, Alireza Zahirieh, Darren A Yuen, Ann Young","doi":"10.1177/20543581251378793","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20543581251378793","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has become increasingly integrated into routine clinical care, though its adoption in nephrology remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This pilot study evaluated a program to train nephrology fellows to perform POCUS to detect small kidney size and hydronephrosis.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>We performed a quality improvement initiative at a single academic center (St. Michael's Hospital).</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>63 patients were included.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Pre- and post-workshop surveys assessed trainees' comfort level with kidney POCUS imaging. Patient satisfaction was also measured using a questionnaire. Time to kidney imaging, radiologic diagnosis and kidney POCUS diagnostic accuracy were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nephrology fellows participated in two 1-hour workshops featuring didactic and hands-on training using POCUS machines, after which they scanned hospitalized patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two native kidneys and 32 transplant kidneys were scanned. Patient surveys indicated high satisfaction with POCUS, with 71% preferring bedside ultrasound in future care. Trainee confidence with using POCUS improved post-workshop. Trainee-performed POCUS demonstrated a specificity of 1.00 (95% CI 0.94-1.00) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.80-1.00) for the detection of hydronephrosis in native and transplant kidneys, respectively. Nephrology trainees demonstrated a specificity of 0.75 (95% CI 0.53-0.90) [left native kidneys], 0.81 (95% CI 0.61-0.93) [right native kidneys] and 0.97 (95% CI 0.84-1.00) [transplant kidneys] for the detection of small kidney size.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The prevalence of hydronephrosis and small kidneys was too low in this pilot study to draw conclusions about sensitivity. Additionally, a majority of the kidneys underwent POCUS imaging after an ultrasound had been performed in the medical imaging department.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the increasing demand for POCUS training in nephrology, a significant gap persists in its clinical integration. Our study demonstrates that a structured workshop improves trainee confidence in kidney POCUS, with high patient satisfaction. Preliminary findings suggest that nephrology fellow-performed POCUS is feasible and promising, though further large-scale studies are needed to validate its clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"12 ","pages":"20543581251378793"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12602957/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145502144","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-04eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20543581251385066
Mathilde Gouin-Bonenfant, Katya Loban, Rosemary Morgan, Heather Badenoch, Ann Bugeja, Christine Dipchand, Rahul Mainra, Marie-Chantal Fortin, Ngan N Lam, Ahsan Alam, Shaifali Sandal
Background: Sex-disaggregated data demonstrate that there are more female than male living kidney donors (LKDs), and this is widely thought to be a manifestation of gender inequities. A better understanding of how gender norms, roles, and relations influence the living kidney donation process is needed.
Objective: We aimed to develop an analytical tool that can be used to conduct a systematic gender analysis of the living kidney donation process.
Design: A participatory research approach was used.
Setting: Canada.
Participants: Canadian living kidney donors and health care professionals.
Methods: Using a participatory research approach, we co-designed a gender analysis matrix (GAM) applicable to the context of living kidney donation. This tool is the first step into conducting a gender analysis of the living kidney donation process. Participants included 11 healthcare professionals, 6 LKDs, 1 patient partner, and a core methodology team (3 qualitative researchers and a gender analysis expert).
Results: Following an iterative process, a final LKD-GAM with 4 columns and 4 rows was created. The gender-specific domains are access to resources, division of labor and everyday practices, social norms and beliefs, and decision-making power and autonomy. Context-specific domains are the decision to donate, physical and mental wellbeing, experiences with health services, and broader social and economic impacts of (non-)donation. Key insights for our future work include diversity in our sample (include LKD candidates, men, and different life stages) and unpacking the notions of consent, constrained consent, and subtle coercion.
Limitations: The GAM's scope is likely limited to the Canadian context. The study was also limited by the recruitment of LKDs from a past list of participants and by the lack of cultural and linguistic diversity in the sample.
Conclusion: Using a participatory co-design approach, we have developed a robust tool that will inform a multinational qualitative study to better understand factors contributing to gender disparities in living kidney donation.
{"title":"Developing an Analytic Tool Using a Participatory Research Approach to Examine Gender Differences in the Living Kidney Donation Process.","authors":"Mathilde Gouin-Bonenfant, Katya Loban, Rosemary Morgan, Heather Badenoch, Ann Bugeja, Christine Dipchand, Rahul Mainra, Marie-Chantal Fortin, Ngan N Lam, Ahsan Alam, Shaifali Sandal","doi":"10.1177/20543581251385066","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20543581251385066","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sex-disaggregated data demonstrate that there are more female than male living kidney donors (LKDs), and this is widely thought to be a manifestation of gender inequities. A better understanding of how gender norms, roles, and relations influence the living kidney donation process is needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to develop an analytical tool that can be used to conduct a systematic gender analysis of the living kidney donation process.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A participatory research approach was used.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Canada.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Canadian living kidney donors and health care professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a participatory research approach, we co-designed a gender analysis matrix (GAM) applicable to the context of living kidney donation. This tool is the first step into conducting a gender analysis of the living kidney donation process. Participants included 11 healthcare professionals, 6 LKDs, 1 patient partner, and a core methodology team (3 qualitative researchers and a gender analysis expert).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following an iterative process, a final LKD-GAM with 4 columns and 4 rows was created. The gender-specific domains are access to resources, division of labor and everyday practices, social norms and beliefs, and decision-making power and autonomy. Context-specific domains are the decision to donate, physical and mental wellbeing, experiences with health services, and broader social and economic impacts of (non-)donation. Key insights for our future work include diversity in our sample (include LKD candidates, men, and different life stages) and unpacking the notions of consent, constrained consent, and subtle coercion.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The GAM's scope is likely limited to the Canadian context. The study was also limited by the recruitment of LKDs from a past list of participants and by the lack of cultural and linguistic diversity in the sample.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a participatory co-design approach, we have developed a robust tool that will inform a multinational qualitative study to better understand factors contributing to gender disparities in living kidney donation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"12 ","pages":"20543581251385066"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12586857/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145457532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-31eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20543581251376556
Jordan Thorne, Laura Berall, Laurette Geldenhuys, Karthik Tennankore
Case description: A 38-year-old man presented with NELL-1 positive membranous nephropathy (MN). Initial treatment with rituximab and later cyclosporine failed to result in sustained clinical improvement. Upon further review, the patient had been applying a skin fairness cream nightly for 2 years preceding diagnosis. The cream was discontinued, and follow-up testing confirmed markedly elevated serum mercury levels of 66.8 µg/L (normal less than 20 µg/L), and 24-hour urine mercury of 103.9 nmol/d. Two rounds of chelation therapy were arranged, the first with dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) and the second with dimercaptopropane-1-sulfonic acid (DMPS) given cost and availability. Repeat mercury levels normalized but follow up kidney biopsy confirmed persistent immune complex glomerulonephritis. The patient was subsequently treated with prednisone followed by additional rituximab resulting in improvement of proteinuria and stabilization of kidney function.
Rationale/teaching points: This case reinforces the risk of mercury containing topicals and is the first to report systemic absorption of this magnitude. While chelation therapy is effective at improving systemic mercury levels, patients may require additional immunosuppression to treat immune complex-mediated MN following exposure.
{"title":"Skin Fairness Cream-Associated NELL-1 Membranous Nephropathy Treatment With Mercury Chelation and Immunosuppressive Therapy: An Educational Case Report.","authors":"Jordan Thorne, Laura Berall, Laurette Geldenhuys, Karthik Tennankore","doi":"10.1177/20543581251376556","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20543581251376556","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Case description: </strong>A 38-year-old man presented with NELL-1 positive membranous nephropathy (MN). Initial treatment with rituximab and later cyclosporine failed to result in sustained clinical improvement. Upon further review, the patient had been applying a skin fairness cream nightly for 2 years preceding diagnosis. The cream was discontinued, and follow-up testing confirmed markedly elevated serum mercury levels of 66.8 µg/L (normal less than 20 µg/L), and 24-hour urine mercury of 103.9 nmol/d. Two rounds of chelation therapy were arranged, the first with dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) and the second with dimercaptopropane-1-sulfonic acid (DMPS) given cost and availability. Repeat mercury levels normalized but follow up kidney biopsy confirmed persistent immune complex glomerulonephritis. The patient was subsequently treated with prednisone followed by additional rituximab resulting in improvement of proteinuria and stabilization of kidney function.</p><p><strong>Rationale/teaching points: </strong>This case reinforces the risk of mercury containing topicals and is the first to report systemic absorption of this magnitude. While chelation therapy is effective at improving systemic mercury levels, patients may require additional immunosuppression to treat immune complex-mediated MN following exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"12 ","pages":"20543581251376556"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12579153/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145430440","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-28eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1177/20543581251380499
Mateen Noori, Rutvi Brahmbhatt, Kristin K Clemens, Louise Moist
Background: Obesity is a chronic disease which directly contributes to the onset and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). For patients with advanced CKD (CKD G4-5D), kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment to improve morbidity and quality of life. However, obesity is a barrier to transplantation, due to an associated risk of postoperative complications and decreased graft survival.
Objective: We sought to understand patient experiences with weight management and CKD to inform future studies in this area.
Design: Descriptive qualitative study.
Setting: London, Ontario, Canada.
Participants: Individuals with CKD G4-5D and experiences with obesity and weight management.
Methods: We interviewed 12 participants with CKD G4-5ND, using thematic analysis and a phenomenological framework. We explored their beliefs, experiences, and expectations of weight loss management. An inductive, open coding technique was used to generate themes that informed our understanding of their shared experiences.
Results: We identified 6 themes from our data: strengths and gaps in healthcare support, influence of social circles and systems, past experiences with weight loss, limitations of current health status, knowledge and motivation around weight management, and personal autonomy in treatment choices.
Limitations: Small homogenous population limits generalizability, self-report of weight loss attempts without numerical data.
Conclusions: Our study emphasizes opportunities for healthcare providers to identify and address potential unmet needs in weight management, while also guiding patient-centered conversations on this topic.
{"title":"Weight Management Experiences Among People With CKD: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Mateen Noori, Rutvi Brahmbhatt, Kristin K Clemens, Louise Moist","doi":"10.1177/20543581251380499","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20543581251380499","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity is a chronic disease which directly contributes to the onset and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). For patients with advanced CKD (CKD G4-5D), kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment to improve morbidity and quality of life. However, obesity is a barrier to transplantation, due to an associated risk of postoperative complications and decreased graft survival.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to understand patient experiences with weight management and CKD to inform future studies in this area.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Descriptive qualitative study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>London, Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Individuals with CKD G4-5D and experiences with obesity and weight management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We interviewed 12 participants with CKD G4-5ND, using thematic analysis and a phenomenological framework. We explored their beliefs, experiences, and expectations of weight loss management. An inductive, open coding technique was used to generate themes that informed our understanding of their shared experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 6 themes from our data: strengths and gaps in healthcare support, influence of social circles and systems, past experiences with weight loss, limitations of current health status, knowledge and motivation around weight management, and personal autonomy in treatment choices.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Small homogenous population limits generalizability, self-report of weight loss attempts without numerical data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study emphasizes opportunities for healthcare providers to identify and address potential unmet needs in weight management, while also guiding patient-centered conversations on this topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"12 ","pages":"20543581251380499"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2025-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12576223/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145430411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}