首页 > 最新文献

Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease最新文献

英文 中文
Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effect of an Exercise Rehabilitation Program on Symptom Burden in Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Clinical Research Protocol. 运动康复计划对维持性血液透析患者症状负担影响的随机对照试验:临床研究协议》。
IF 1.7 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-04-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/20543581241234724
Emilie Ford, Krista Stewart, Eric Garcia, Monica Sharma, Reid Whitlock, Ruth Getachew, Krista Rossum, Todd A Duhamel, Mauro Verrelli, James Zacharias, Paul Komenda, Navdeep Tangri, Claudio Rigatto, Jennifer M MacRae, Clara Bohm
<p><strong>Background: </strong>People receiving hemodialysis experience high symptom burden that contributes to low functional status and poor health-related quality of life. Management of symptoms is a priority for individuals receiving hemodialysis but limited effective treatments exist. There is emerging evidence that exercise programming can improve several common dialysis-related symptoms.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of an exercise rehabilitation program on symptom burden in individuals receiving maintenance hemodialysis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter, randomized controlled, 1:1 parallel, open label, prospective blinded end point trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Three facility-based hemodialysis units in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adults aged 18 years or older with end-stage kidney disease receiving facility-based maintenance hemodialysis for more than 3 months, with at least 1 dialysis-related symptom as indicated by the Dialysis Symptom Index (DSI) severity score >0 (n = 150).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Supervised 26-week exercise rehabilitation program and 60 minutes of cycling during hemodialysis thrice weekly. Exercise intensity and duration were supervised and individualized by the kinesiologist as per participant baseline physical function with gradual progression over the course of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Control: </strong>Usual hemodialysis care (no exercise program).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Our primary outcome is change in symptom burden at 12 weeks as measured by the DSI severity score. Secondary outcomes include change in modified DSI severity score (includes 10 symptoms most plausible to improve with exercise), change in DSI severity score at 26 and 52 weeks; time to recover post-hemodialysis; health-related quality of life measured using EuroQol (EQ)-5D-5L; physical activity behavior measured by self-report (Godin-Shepherd questionnaire) and triaxial accelerometry; exercise capacity (shuttle walk test); frailty (Fried); self-efficacy for exercise; and 1-year hospitalization and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Change in primary outcome will be compared between groups by independent 2-tailed <i>t</i> test or Mann-Whitney U test depending on data distribution and using generalized linear mixed models, with study time point as a random effect and adjusted for baseline DSI score. Similarly, change in secondary outcomes will be compared between groups over time using appropriate parametric and nonparametric statistical tests depending on data type and distribution.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic restrictions on clinical research at our institution delayed completion of target recruitment and prevented collection of accelerometry and physical function outcome data for 15 months until restrictions were lifted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The
背景:血液透析患者的症状负担很重,导致功能状态低下和健康相关生活质量低下。控制症状是血液透析患者的首要任务,但目前有效的治疗方法有限。有新的证据表明,运动计划可以改善几种常见的透析相关症状:本研究的主要目的是评估运动康复计划对维持性血液透析患者症状负担的影响:多中心、随机对照、1:1 平行、开放标签、前瞻性盲法终点试验:地点:加拿大马尼托巴省温尼伯市的三家血液透析单位:年龄在18岁或18岁以上的终末期肾病患者,接受设施内维持性血液透析3个月以上,至少有1种透析相关症状,透析症状指数(DSI)严重程度大于0分(n=150):干预措施:为期 26 周的运动康复计划和每周三次在血液透析期间进行 60 分钟的自行车运动。运动强度和持续时间由运动学专家根据参与者的基线身体功能进行监督和个性化设计,并在干预过程中逐步推进:对照组:常规血液透析护理(无运动计划):我们的主要结果是 12 周后症状负担的变化,以 DSI 严重程度评分来衡量。次要结果包括修改后的 DSI 严重程度评分(包括 10 个最有可能通过运动改善的症状)的变化、26 周和 52 周时 DSI 严重程度评分的变化、血液透析后恢复时间、使用 EuroQol (EQ)-5D-5L 测量的健康相关生活质量、通过自我报告(Godin-Shepherd 问卷)和三轴加速度测量的身体活动行为、运动能力(穿梭步行测试)、虚弱程度(Fried)、运动自我效能以及 1 年住院时间和死亡率。方法:将根据数据分布情况,使用广义线性混合模型,将研究时间点作为随机效应,并根据基线 DSI 分数进行调整,通过独立的双尾 t 检验或 Mann-Whitney U 检验来比较组间主要结果的变化。同样,将根据数据类型和分布情况,使用适当的参数和非参数统计检验来比较不同组间随时间的次要结果变化:COVID-19大流行对本机构临床研究的限制延迟了目标招募的完成,并在限制解除前的15个月内无法收集加速度计和身体功能结果数据:应用运动康复计划来改善血液透析患者的症状负担可能会改善血液透析患者的常见症状,并在长期内提高生活质量、减少残疾和发病率。重要的是,这项务实的研究采用了标准化的运动干预措施,能够适应基本的身体功能,弥补了血液透析患者临床治疗和我们现有知识中的一个重要缺口。
{"title":"Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effect of an Exercise Rehabilitation Program on Symptom Burden in Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Clinical Research Protocol.","authors":"Emilie Ford, Krista Stewart, Eric Garcia, Monica Sharma, Reid Whitlock, Ruth Getachew, Krista Rossum, Todd A Duhamel, Mauro Verrelli, James Zacharias, Paul Komenda, Navdeep Tangri, Claudio Rigatto, Jennifer M MacRae, Clara Bohm","doi":"10.1177/20543581241234724","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20543581241234724","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;People receiving hemodialysis experience high symptom burden that contributes to low functional status and poor health-related quality of life. Management of symptoms is a priority for individuals receiving hemodialysis but limited effective treatments exist. There is emerging evidence that exercise programming can improve several common dialysis-related symptoms.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of an exercise rehabilitation program on symptom burden in individuals receiving maintenance hemodialysis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design: &lt;/strong&gt;Multicenter, randomized controlled, 1:1 parallel, open label, prospective blinded end point trial.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Setting: &lt;/strong&gt;Three facility-based hemodialysis units in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Participants: &lt;/strong&gt;Adults aged 18 years or older with end-stage kidney disease receiving facility-based maintenance hemodialysis for more than 3 months, with at least 1 dialysis-related symptom as indicated by the Dialysis Symptom Index (DSI) severity score &gt;0 (n = 150).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Intervention: &lt;/strong&gt;Supervised 26-week exercise rehabilitation program and 60 minutes of cycling during hemodialysis thrice weekly. Exercise intensity and duration were supervised and individualized by the kinesiologist as per participant baseline physical function with gradual progression over the course of the intervention.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Control: &lt;/strong&gt;Usual hemodialysis care (no exercise program).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Measurements: &lt;/strong&gt;Our primary outcome is change in symptom burden at 12 weeks as measured by the DSI severity score. Secondary outcomes include change in modified DSI severity score (includes 10 symptoms most plausible to improve with exercise), change in DSI severity score at 26 and 52 weeks; time to recover post-hemodialysis; health-related quality of life measured using EuroQol (EQ)-5D-5L; physical activity behavior measured by self-report (Godin-Shepherd questionnaire) and triaxial accelerometry; exercise capacity (shuttle walk test); frailty (Fried); self-efficacy for exercise; and 1-year hospitalization and mortality.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Change in primary outcome will be compared between groups by independent 2-tailed &lt;i&gt;t&lt;/i&gt; test or Mann-Whitney U test depending on data distribution and using generalized linear mixed models, with study time point as a random effect and adjusted for baseline DSI score. Similarly, change in secondary outcomes will be compared between groups over time using appropriate parametric and nonparametric statistical tests depending on data type and distribution.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Limitations: &lt;/strong&gt;The COVID-19 pandemic restrictions on clinical research at our institution delayed completion of target recruitment and prevented collection of accelerometry and physical function outcome data for 15 months until restrictions were lifted.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;The ","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"11 ","pages":"20543581241234724"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10993676/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140847946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Association Between Intradialytic Symptom Clusters and Recovery Time in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis: An Exploratory Analysis. 维持性血液透析患者析出内症状群与恢复时间之间的关系:探索性分析
IF 1.7 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-03-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/20543581241237322
Arrti A Bhasin, Jennifer M MacRae, Braden Manns, Kelvin C W Leung, Amber O Molnar, Jason W Busse, David Collister, K Scott Brimble, Christian G Rabbat, Jessica Tyrwhitt, Andrea Mazzetti, Michael Walsh
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals receiving hemodialysis often experience concurrent symptoms during treatment and frequently report feeling unwell after dialysis. The degree to which intradialytic symptoms are related, and which specific symptoms may impair health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore intradialytic symptoms clusters, and the relationship between intradialytic symptom clusters with dialysis treatment recovery time and HRQoL.</p><p><strong>Design/setting: </strong>We conducted a post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study of 118 prevalent patients receiving hemodialysis in two centers in Calgary, Alberta and Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adults receiving hemodialysis treatment for at least 3 months, not scheduled for a modality change within 6 weeks of study commencement, who could provide informed consent and were able to complete English questionnaires independently or with assistance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants self-reported the presence (1 = <i>none</i> to 5 = <i>very much</i>) of 10 symptoms during each dialysis treatment, the time it took to recover from each treatment, and weekly Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-Item-Short Form (KDQoL-36) assessments. Principal component analysis identified clusters of intradialytic symptoms. Mixed-effects, ordinal and linear regression examined the association between symptom clusters and recovery time (categorized as 0, >0 to 2, >2 to 6, or >6 hours), and the physical component and mental component scores (PCS and MCS) of the KDQoL-36.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred sixteen participants completed 901 intradialytic symptom questionnaires. The most common symptom was lack of energy (56% of treatments). Two intradialytic symptom clusters explained 39% of the total variance of available symptom data. The first cluster included bone or joint pain, muscle cramps, muscle soreness, feeling nervous, and lack of energy. The second cluster included nausea/vomiting, diarrhea and chest pain, and headache. The first cluster (median score: -0.56, 25th to 75th percentile: -1.18 to 0.55) was independently associated with longer recovery time (odds ratio [OR] 1.62 per unit difference in score, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23-2.12) and decreased PCS (-0.72 per unit difference in score, 95% CI: -1.29 to -0.15) and MCS scores (-0.82 per unit difference in score, 95% CI: -1.48 to -0.16), whereas the second cluster was not (OR 1.24, 95% CI: 0.97-1.58; PCS 0.19, 95% CI -0.46 to 0.83; MCS -0.72, 95% CI: -1.50 to 0.06).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This was an exploratory analysis of a small data set from 2 centers. Further work is needed to externally validate these findings to confirm intradialytic symptom clusters and the generalizability of our findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intradialytic symptoms are correlated. The presence of select intradialytic symp
背景:接受血液透析的患者在治疗期间经常会出现并发症状,透析后也经常会感到不适。透析内症状的相关程度以及哪些特定症状可能会损害健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)尚不确定:探讨透析内症状群,以及透析内症状群与透析治疗恢复时间和 HRQoL 之间的关系:我们对在加拿大阿尔伯塔省卡尔加里市和安大略省汉密尔顿市两家中心接受血液透析的 118 名流行病患者的前瞻性队列研究进行了事后分析:接受血液透析治疗至少 3 个月的成人,在研究开始后 6 周内未计划更换透析方式,可提供知情同意书,能够独立或在他人协助下完成英文问卷:参与者自我报告每次透析治疗期间出现的 10 种症状(1 = 无到 5 = 非常多)、每次治疗后恢复所需的时间以及每周的肾病生活质量 36 项短表(KDQoL-36)评估。主成分分析确定了透析内症状群。混合效应、序数和线性回归检验了症状群与恢复时间(分为0小时、>0至2小时、>2至6小时或>6小时)以及KDQoL-36的身体成分和精神成分得分(PCS和MCS)之间的关系:116 名参与者填写了 901 份肾内症状问卷。最常见的症状是乏力(占治疗的 56%)。两个椎管内症状群解释了现有症状数据总方差的 39%。第一个症状群包括骨或关节疼痛、肌肉痉挛、肌肉酸痛、紧张和乏力。第二组包括恶心/呕吐、腹泻、胸痛和头痛。第一组评分(中位数:-0.56,第 25 到 75 百分位数:-1.18 到 0.55)与较长的恢复时间独立相关(评分每单位差异的几率比 [OR] 为 1.62,95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.23-2.12):而第二组则不然(OR 1.24,95% CI:0.97-1.58;PCS 0.19,95% CI -0.46-0.83;MCS -0.72,95% CI:-1.50-0.06):局限性:这是对来自两个中心的小数据集进行的探索性分析。局限性:这是一项来自两个中心的小型数据集的探索性分析,还需要进一步的工作对这些结果进行外部验证,以确认椎管内症状群和我们研究结果的普遍性:结论:椎管内症状具有相关性。结论:透析内症状具有相关性,特定透析内症状的存在可能会延长患者从透析治疗中恢复的时间,并损害患者的 HRQoL。
{"title":"The Association Between Intradialytic Symptom Clusters and Recovery Time in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis: An Exploratory Analysis.","authors":"Arrti A Bhasin, Jennifer M MacRae, Braden Manns, Kelvin C W Leung, Amber O Molnar, Jason W Busse, David Collister, K Scott Brimble, Christian G Rabbat, Jessica Tyrwhitt, Andrea Mazzetti, Michael Walsh","doi":"10.1177/20543581241237322","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20543581241237322","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Individuals receiving hemodialysis often experience concurrent symptoms during treatment and frequently report feeling unwell after dialysis. The degree to which intradialytic symptoms are related, and which specific symptoms may impair health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is uncertain.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objectives: &lt;/strong&gt;To explore intradialytic symptoms clusters, and the relationship between intradialytic symptom clusters with dialysis treatment recovery time and HRQoL.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design/setting: &lt;/strong&gt;We conducted a post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study of 118 prevalent patients receiving hemodialysis in two centers in Calgary, Alberta and Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Participants: &lt;/strong&gt;Adults receiving hemodialysis treatment for at least 3 months, not scheduled for a modality change within 6 weeks of study commencement, who could provide informed consent and were able to complete English questionnaires independently or with assistance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Participants self-reported the presence (1 = &lt;i&gt;none&lt;/i&gt; to 5 = &lt;i&gt;very much&lt;/i&gt;) of 10 symptoms during each dialysis treatment, the time it took to recover from each treatment, and weekly Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-Item-Short Form (KDQoL-36) assessments. Principal component analysis identified clusters of intradialytic symptoms. Mixed-effects, ordinal and linear regression examined the association between symptom clusters and recovery time (categorized as 0, &gt;0 to 2, &gt;2 to 6, or &gt;6 hours), and the physical component and mental component scores (PCS and MCS) of the KDQoL-36.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;One hundred sixteen participants completed 901 intradialytic symptom questionnaires. The most common symptom was lack of energy (56% of treatments). Two intradialytic symptom clusters explained 39% of the total variance of available symptom data. The first cluster included bone or joint pain, muscle cramps, muscle soreness, feeling nervous, and lack of energy. The second cluster included nausea/vomiting, diarrhea and chest pain, and headache. The first cluster (median score: -0.56, 25th to 75th percentile: -1.18 to 0.55) was independently associated with longer recovery time (odds ratio [OR] 1.62 per unit difference in score, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23-2.12) and decreased PCS (-0.72 per unit difference in score, 95% CI: -1.29 to -0.15) and MCS scores (-0.82 per unit difference in score, 95% CI: -1.48 to -0.16), whereas the second cluster was not (OR 1.24, 95% CI: 0.97-1.58; PCS 0.19, 95% CI -0.46 to 0.83; MCS -0.72, 95% CI: -1.50 to 0.06).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Limitations: &lt;/strong&gt;This was an exploratory analysis of a small data set from 2 centers. Further work is needed to externally validate these findings to confirm intradialytic symptom clusters and the generalizability of our findings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Intradialytic symptoms are correlated. The presence of select intradialytic symp","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"11 ","pages":"20543581241237322"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10964465/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140292880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of the 2021 CKD-EPI eGFR Equation on Kidney Care Referral Criteria in Ontario, Canada: A Population-based Cross-sectional Study. 2021 年 CKD-EPI eGFR 公式对加拿大安大略省肾脏护理转诊标准的影响:基于人口的横断面研究。
IF 1.7 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-03-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/20543581241229258
Eric McArthur, Graham Smith, Manish M Sood, Peter G Blake, K Scott Brimble, Flory T Muanda, Amit X Garg, Stephanie N Dixon
<p><strong>Background: </strong>In some jurisdictions, individuals become eligible or recommended for referral for different types of kidney care using criteria based on their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Historically, GFR was estimated with an equation developed in 2009, which included a Black race term. An updated, race-free equation was developed in 2021. It is unclear how adoption of the 2021 equation will influence the number of individuals meeting referral criteria to receive different types of kidney care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop population-based estimates on how the number of individuals meeting the eGFR-based referral criteria to receive three different types of kidney care (nephrologist consultation, care in a multi-care specialty clinic, kidney transplant evaluation) changes when the 2021 versus 2009 equation is used to calculate eGFR.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Population-based, cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Ontario, Canada's most populous province with 14.2 million residents as of 2021. Less than 5% of Ontario's residents self-identify as being of Black race.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults with at least one outpatient serum creatinine measurement in the 2 years prior to December 31, 2021.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Referral criteria to 3 different types of kidney care: nephrologist consultation, multi-care specialty clinic, and evaluation for a kidney transplant. The eGFR thresholds used to define referral eligibility or recommendation for these kidney health services were based on guidelines from Ontario's provincial renal agency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The number of individuals meeting referral criteria for the 3 different healthcare services was compared between the 2009 and 2021 equations, restricted to individuals not yet receiving that level of care. As individual-level race data were not available, estimates were repeated, randomly assigning a Black race status to 1%, 5%, and 10% of the population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We had an outpatient serum creatinine measurement available for 1 048 110 adults. Using the 2009 equation, 37 345 individuals met the criteria to be referred to a nephrologist, 10 019 met the criteria to receive care in a multi-care specialty clinic, and 10 178 met the criteria to be referred for kidney transplant evaluation. Corresponding numbers with the 2021 equation (and the percent relative to the 2009 equation) were 26 645 (71.3%), 9009 (89.9%), and 8615 (84.6%) individuals, respectively. These numbers were largely unchanged when Black race was assumed in up to 10% of the population.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Referral criteria based solely on urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio were not assessed. Self-reported race data were unavailable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For healthcare planning, in regions where a minority of the population is Black, a substantial number of individuals may no
背景:在一些司法管辖区,根据个人的估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)标准,个人有资格或建议转诊接受不同类型的肾脏治疗。从历史上看,肾小球滤过率是根据 2009 年制定的公式估算的,该公式包含一个黑人种族项。2021 年制定了不含种族因素的最新公式。目前还不清楚 2021 年方程的采用将如何影响符合转诊标准、接受不同类型肾脏治疗的人数:以人群为基础,估算当采用 2021 年方程与 2009 年方程计算 eGFR 时,符合基于 eGFR 的转诊标准以接受三种不同类型肾脏治疗(肾病专家会诊、多种专科诊所治疗、肾移植评估)的人数有何变化:设计:基于人群的横断面研究:安大略省是加拿大人口最多的省份,截至 2021 年共有 1420 万居民。安大略省不到 5%的居民自认为是黑人:患者:在 2021 年 12 月 31 日之前的两年内至少在门诊测量过一次血清肌酐的成年人:3种不同类型肾脏护理的转诊标准:肾科医师会诊、多种护理专科门诊和肾移植评估。用于界定这些肾脏保健服务的转诊资格或建议的 eGFR 临界值是基于安大略省肾脏机构的指南:对 2009 年和 2021 年方程中符合 3 种不同医疗服务转介标准的人数进行了比较,但仅限于尚未接受该级别医疗服务的个人。由于无法获得个人层面的种族数据,因此重复进行了估算,随机为1%、5%和10%的人口分配了黑人种族身份:我们获得了 1 048 110 名成人的门诊血清肌酐测量数据。根据 2009 年的计算公式,37 345 人达到了转诊至肾科医生的标准,10 019 人达到了在综合专科诊所接受治疗的标准,10 178 人达到了接受肾移植评估的标准。采用 2021 年等式的相应人数(以及相对于 2009 年等式的百分比)分别为 26 645 人(71.3%)、9009 人(89.9%)和 8615 人(84.6%)。当假定黑人占总人口的 10%时,这些数字基本保持不变:未评估仅基于尿白蛋白与肌酐比值的转诊标准。无法获得自我报告的种族数据:对于医疗保健规划而言,在黑人占人口少数的地区,采用新的 2021 年 eGFR 方程后,相当多的人可能不再符合不同类型肾脏医疗保健的转诊标准。
{"title":"Impact of the 2021 CKD-EPI eGFR Equation on Kidney Care Referral Criteria in Ontario, Canada: A Population-based Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Eric McArthur, Graham Smith, Manish M Sood, Peter G Blake, K Scott Brimble, Flory T Muanda, Amit X Garg, Stephanie N Dixon","doi":"10.1177/20543581241229258","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20543581241229258","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;In some jurisdictions, individuals become eligible or recommended for referral for different types of kidney care using criteria based on their estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Historically, GFR was estimated with an equation developed in 2009, which included a Black race term. An updated, race-free equation was developed in 2021. It is unclear how adoption of the 2021 equation will influence the number of individuals meeting referral criteria to receive different types of kidney care.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To develop population-based estimates on how the number of individuals meeting the eGFR-based referral criteria to receive three different types of kidney care (nephrologist consultation, care in a multi-care specialty clinic, kidney transplant evaluation) changes when the 2021 versus 2009 equation is used to calculate eGFR.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design: &lt;/strong&gt;Population-based, cross-sectional study.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Setting: &lt;/strong&gt;Ontario, Canada's most populous province with 14.2 million residents as of 2021. Less than 5% of Ontario's residents self-identify as being of Black race.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Patients: &lt;/strong&gt;Adults with at least one outpatient serum creatinine measurement in the 2 years prior to December 31, 2021.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Measurements: &lt;/strong&gt;Referral criteria to 3 different types of kidney care: nephrologist consultation, multi-care specialty clinic, and evaluation for a kidney transplant. The eGFR thresholds used to define referral eligibility or recommendation for these kidney health services were based on guidelines from Ontario's provincial renal agency.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;The number of individuals meeting referral criteria for the 3 different healthcare services was compared between the 2009 and 2021 equations, restricted to individuals not yet receiving that level of care. As individual-level race data were not available, estimates were repeated, randomly assigning a Black race status to 1%, 5%, and 10% of the population.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;We had an outpatient serum creatinine measurement available for 1 048 110 adults. Using the 2009 equation, 37 345 individuals met the criteria to be referred to a nephrologist, 10 019 met the criteria to receive care in a multi-care specialty clinic, and 10 178 met the criteria to be referred for kidney transplant evaluation. Corresponding numbers with the 2021 equation (and the percent relative to the 2009 equation) were 26 645 (71.3%), 9009 (89.9%), and 8615 (84.6%) individuals, respectively. These numbers were largely unchanged when Black race was assumed in up to 10% of the population.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Limitations: &lt;/strong&gt;Referral criteria based solely on urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio were not assessed. Self-reported race data were unavailable.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;For healthcare planning, in regions where a minority of the population is Black, a substantial number of individuals may no ","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"11 ","pages":"20543581241229258"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10960975/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140206385","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advancing Community Care and Access to Follow-up After Acute Kidney Injury Hospitalization: Design of the AFTER AKI Randomized Controlled Trial. 促进急性肾损伤住院后的社区护理和随访:AFTER AKI 随机对照试验的设计。
IF 1.7 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-03-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/20543581241236419
Meha Bhatt, Eleanor Benterud, Taylor Palechuk, Coralea Bignell, Nasreen Ahmed, Kerry McBrien, Matthew T James, Neesh Pannu

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication among hospitalized patients with long-term implications including chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although models are available to predict the risk of advanced CKD after AKI, there is limited evidence regarding follow-up for patients with AKI after hospital discharge, resulting in variable follow-up care. A risk-stratified follow-up approach may improve appropriateness and efficiency of management for CKD among patients at risk of declining kidney function following AKI.

Objective: The objective was to compare and evaluate the use of a risk-stratified approach to follow-up care vs usual care for patients with AKI after hospital discharge.

Design: This study was a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Setting: This study was conducted in 2 large urban hospitals in Alberta, Canada.

Patients: Hospitalized patients with AKI (KDIGO stage 2 or 3) not previously under the care of a nephrologist, expected to survive greater than 90 days being discharged home.

Measurements: We will evaluate whether guideline-recommended CKD care processes are initiated within 90 days, including statin use, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) use in those with proteinuria or diabetes, and nephrologist follow-up if sustained eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2. We will also assess the feasibility of recruitment and the proportion of patients completing the recommended blood and urine tests at 90 days.

Methods: Patients with AKI will be enrolled and randomized near the time of hospital discharge. In the intervention group, low risk patients will receive information regarding AKI, medium risk patients will additionally receive follow-up guidance sent to their primary care physician, and high-risk patients will additionally receive follow-up with a nephrologist. Participants in the intervention and usual care group will receive a requisition for urine testing and bloodwork at 90 days following hospital discharge. Telephone follow-up will be conducted for all study participants at 90 days and 1 year after hospital discharge. Bivariate tests of association will be conducted to evaluate group differences at the follow-up time points.

Limitations: We expect there may be challenges with recruitment due to the significant co-existence of comorbidity in this population.

Conclusions: If the trial shows a positive effect on these processes for kidney care, it will inform larger-scale trial to determine whether this intervention reduces the incidence of long-term clinical adverse events, including CKD progression, cardiovascular events, and mortality following hospitalization with AKI.

背景:急性肾损伤(AKI)是住院患者中常见的并发症,具有包括慢性肾脏病(CKD)在内的长期影响。虽然目前已有模型可预测急性肾损伤后发生晚期 CKD 的风险,但有关急性肾损伤患者出院后随访的证据却很有限,导致随访护理参差不齐。风险分级的随访方法可提高对 AKI 后肾功能有下降风险的患者进行 CKD 管理的适当性和效率:目的:比较并评估对出院后 AKI 患者采用风险分级随访方法与常规随访方法的效果:本研究是一项实用随机对照试验:本研究在加拿大艾伯塔省的两家大型城市医院进行:患者:AKI(KDIGO 2 期或 3 期)住院患者,之前未接受过肾科医生的治疗,预计出院回家后存活时间超过 90 天:我们将评估是否在 90 天内启动了指南推荐的 CKD 护理流程,包括他汀类药物的使用、蛋白尿或糖尿病患者血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂 (ACEi)/ 血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂 (ARB) 的使用,以及如果 eGFR 持续为 2,肾科医生是否进行了随访。 我们还将评估招募的可行性,以及在 90 天内完成建议的血液和尿液检查的患者比例:方法:AKI 患者将在临近出院时进行登记和随机分组。在干预组中,低危患者将收到有关 AKI 的信息,中危患者将额外收到发送给主治医生的随访指导,高危患者将额外收到肾病专家的随访指导。干预组和常规护理组的参与者将在出院后 90 天收到尿检和血检申请单。所有研究参与者将在出院 90 天和 1 年后接受电话随访。我们将进行二元关联检验,以评估随访时间点的组间差异:我们预计,由于该人群中同时存在大量合并症,招募工作可能会面临挑战:如果该试验对这些肾脏护理流程产生了积极影响,它将为更大规模的试验提供依据,以确定这种干预措施是否能降低长期临床不良事件的发生率,包括 CKD 进展、心血管事件和 AKI 住院后的死亡率。
{"title":"Advancing Community Care and Access to Follow-up After Acute Kidney Injury Hospitalization: Design of the AFTER AKI Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Meha Bhatt, Eleanor Benterud, Taylor Palechuk, Coralea Bignell, Nasreen Ahmed, Kerry McBrien, Matthew T James, Neesh Pannu","doi":"10.1177/20543581241236419","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20543581241236419","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication among hospitalized patients with long-term implications including chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although models are available to predict the risk of advanced CKD after AKI, there is limited evidence regarding follow-up for patients with AKI after hospital discharge, resulting in variable follow-up care. A risk-stratified follow-up approach may improve appropriateness and efficiency of management for CKD among patients at risk of declining kidney function following AKI.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to compare and evaluate the use of a risk-stratified approach to follow-up care vs usual care for patients with AKI after hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study was a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study was conducted in 2 large urban hospitals in Alberta, Canada.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Hospitalized patients with AKI (KDIGO stage 2 or 3) not previously under the care of a nephrologist, expected to survive greater than 90 days being discharged home.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>We will evaluate whether guideline-recommended CKD care processes are initiated within 90 days, including statin use, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) use in those with proteinuria or diabetes, and nephrologist follow-up if sustained eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m<sup>2</sup>. We will also assess the feasibility of recruitment and the proportion of patients completing the recommended blood and urine tests at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with AKI will be enrolled and randomized near the time of hospital discharge. In the intervention group, low risk patients will receive information regarding AKI, medium risk patients will additionally receive follow-up guidance sent to their primary care physician, and high-risk patients will additionally receive follow-up with a nephrologist. Participants in the intervention and usual care group will receive a requisition for urine testing and bloodwork at 90 days following hospital discharge. Telephone follow-up will be conducted for all study participants at 90 days and 1 year after hospital discharge. Bivariate tests of association will be conducted to evaluate group differences at the follow-up time points.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>We expect there may be challenges with recruitment due to the significant co-existence of comorbidity in this population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>If the trial shows a positive effect on these processes for kidney care, it will inform larger-scale trial to determine whether this intervention reduces the incidence of long-term clinical adverse events, including CKD progression, cardiovascular events, and mortality following hospitalization with AKI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"11 ","pages":"20543581241236419"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10943706/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140142781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Zinc Supplementation Trial in Pediatric Chronic Kidney Disease: Effects on Circulating FGF-23 and Klotho. 小儿慢性肾脏病补锌试验:对循环 FGF-23 和 Klotho 的影响
IF 1.7 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-03-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/20543581241234723
V Belostotsky, S A Atkinson, G Filler

Background: Zinc status, its role in bone metabolism and efficacy of deficiency correction has not been well studied in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Objectives: The primary objective was to investigate whether 3 months of oral zinc supplementation corrects zinc deficiency in children with CKD who have native or transplanted kidneys. The secondary objective was to compare circulating intact FGF-23 (iFGF-23), c-terminal FGF-23 (cFGF-23), and Klotho between zinc-sufficient and zinc-deficient children with CKD and to assess the relationship between circulating zinc, iFGF-23, cFGF-23, Klotho, bone biomarkers, copper, and phosphate excretion pre-supplementation and post-supplementation of zinc.

Methods: Forty-one children (25 male and 16 female, age 12.94 ± 4.13 years) with CKD in native or transplanted kidneys were recruited through 2 pediatric nephrology divisions in Ontario, Canada. Of those, 14 patients (9 native CKD, 5 transplant CKD) with identified zinc deficiency (64% enrollment rate) received zinc citrate supplement for 3 months: 10 mg orally once (4-8 years) or twice (9-18 years) daily.

Results: Zinc deficiency (plasma concentration < 11.5 µmol/L) was found in 22 patients (53.7%). A linear regression model suggested that zinc concentration reduced by 0.026 µmol/L (P = .04) for every 1-unit of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) drop. Zinc deficiency status was associated with higher serum iFGF-23; however, this was predominantly determined by the falling GFR. Zinc deficient and sufficient children had similar circulating c-FGF-23 and alpha-Klotho. Normalization of plasma zinc concentration was achieved in 8 (5 native CKD and 3 transplant CKD) out of 14 treated patients rising from 10.04 ± 1.42 to 12.29 ± 3.77 μmol/L (P = .0038). There were no significant changes in other biochemical measures in all treated patients. A statistically significant (P = .0078) rise in c-FGF-23 was observed only in a subgroup of 11 children treated with zinc but not receiving calcitriol.

Conclusions: Zinc status is related to kidney function and possibly connected to bone metabolism in patients with CKD. However, it plays a minor role in fine-tuning various metabolic processes. In this exploratory non-randomized study, 3 months supplementation with zinc corrected deficiency in just over half of patients and only modestly affected bone metabolism in asymptomatic CKD patients.

背景:对慢性肾脏病(CKD)儿童的锌状况、锌在骨代谢中的作用以及缺锌纠正的效果尚未进行深入研究:对于慢性肾脏病(CKD)患儿的锌状况、锌在骨代谢中的作用以及锌缺乏症的纠正效果尚未进行深入研究:主要目的是研究口服锌补充剂 3 个月是否能纠正原生肾脏或移植肾脏的 CKD 儿童的锌缺乏症。次要目的是比较锌充足和锌缺乏的 CKD 儿童血液中完整 FGF-23 (iFGF-23)、c-末端 FGF-23 (cFGF-23) 和 Klotho 的含量,并评估补锌前和补锌后血液中的锌、iFGF-23、cFGF-23、Klotho、骨生物标志物、铜和磷酸盐排泄量之间的关系:通过加拿大安大略省的两个儿科肾病科招募了 41 名患有原生肾脏或移植肾脏慢性肾功能衰竭的儿童(男 25 名,女 16 名,年龄为 12.94 ± 4.13 岁)。其中,14 名患者(9 名原发性 CKD,5 名移植性 CKD)被确认缺锌(入选率为 64%),接受了为期 3 个月的柠檬酸锌补充剂治疗:每天口服一次(4-8 岁)或两次(9-18 岁),每次 10 毫克:结果:22 名患者(53.7%)发现缺锌(血浆浓度小于 11.5 µmol/L)。线性回归模型表明,估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)每下降 1 个单位,锌浓度就会降低 0.026 µmol/L(P = .04)。缺锌状态与血清 iFGF-23 的升高有关,但这主要取决于肾小球滤过率的下降。缺锌和足锌儿童的循环 c-FGF-23 和 alpha-Klotho 含量相似。在 14 名接受治疗的患者中,8 名(5 名原发性 CKD 和 3 名移植性 CKD)患者的血浆锌浓度从 10.04 ± 1.42 μmol/L 升至 12.29 ± 3.77 μmol/L(P = .0038),达到正常水平。所有接受治疗的患者的其他生化指标均无明显变化。只有在接受锌治疗但未服用降钙素三醇的11名儿童中,观察到c-FGF-23的上升具有统计学意义(P = .0078):结论:锌状况与肾功能有关,并可能与慢性肾脏病患者的骨代谢有关。结论:锌状况与肾功能有关,并可能与慢性肾脏病患者的骨代谢有关,但它在微调各种代谢过程中的作用较小。在这项探索性的非随机研究中,补锌 3 个月可纠正一半以上患者的锌缺乏症,对无症状的慢性肾功能衰竭患者的骨代谢影响不大。
{"title":"Zinc Supplementation Trial in Pediatric Chronic Kidney Disease: Effects on Circulating FGF-23 and Klotho.","authors":"V Belostotsky, S A Atkinson, G Filler","doi":"10.1177/20543581241234723","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20543581241234723","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Zinc status, its role in bone metabolism and efficacy of deficiency correction has not been well studied in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective was to investigate whether 3 months of oral zinc supplementation corrects zinc deficiency in children with CKD who have native or transplanted kidneys. The secondary objective was to compare circulating intact FGF-23 (iFGF-23), c-terminal FGF-23 (cFGF-23), and Klotho between zinc-sufficient and zinc-deficient children with CKD and to assess the relationship between circulating zinc, iFGF-23, cFGF-23, Klotho, bone biomarkers, copper, and phosphate excretion pre-supplementation and post-supplementation of zinc.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-one children (25 male and 16 female, age 12.94 ± 4.13 years) with CKD in native or transplanted kidneys were recruited through 2 pediatric nephrology divisions in Ontario, Canada. Of those, 14 patients (9 native CKD, 5 transplant CKD) with identified zinc deficiency (64% enrollment rate) received zinc citrate supplement for 3 months: 10 mg orally once (4-8 years) or twice (9-18 years) daily.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Zinc deficiency (plasma concentration < 11.5 µmol/L) was found in 22 patients (53.7%). A linear regression model suggested that zinc concentration reduced by 0.026 µmol/L (<i>P</i> = .04) for every 1-unit of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) drop. Zinc deficiency status was associated with higher serum iFGF-23; however, this was predominantly determined by the falling GFR. Zinc deficient and sufficient children had similar circulating c-FGF-23 and alpha-Klotho. Normalization of plasma zinc concentration was achieved in 8 (5 native CKD and 3 transplant CKD) out of 14 treated patients rising from 10.04 ± 1.42 to 12.29 ± 3.77 μmol/L (<i>P</i> = .0038). There were no significant changes in other biochemical measures in all treated patients. A statistically significant (<i>P</i> = .0078) rise in c-FGF-23 was observed only in a subgroup of 11 children treated with zinc but not receiving calcitriol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Zinc status is related to kidney function and possibly connected to bone metabolism in patients with CKD. However, it plays a minor role in fine-tuning various metabolic processes. In this exploratory non-randomized study, 3 months supplementation with zinc corrected deficiency in just over half of patients and only modestly affected bone metabolism in asymptomatic CKD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"11 ","pages":"20543581241234723"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10938622/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140130725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Royal Jelly, A Super Food, Protects Against Celecoxib-Induced Renal Toxicity in Adult Male Albino Rats. 蜂王浆--一种超级食品--可保护成年雄性白化大鼠免受塞来昔布诱发的肾毒性影响
IF 1.7 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-03-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/20543581241235526
Hesham A M I Khalifa, Naglaa Z H Eleiwa, Heba A Nazim

Background: Celecoxib is a COX-2 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). It is widely used for the treatment of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis.

Objective: This study aimed to explore the effect of long-term administration of celecoxib on kidney of male albino rats, and to study the potential effect of treatment discontinuation on such tissues. The study also examined the alleged ameliorative effect of royal jelly (RJ).

Methods: Fifty, male albino rats were divided into 5 equal groups; 10 each. Group 1: rats received no drug (control group). Group 2: rats received celecoxib (50 mg/kg/day, orally for 30 successive days). Group 3: rats received celecoxib (50 mg/kg/day, orally) and royal jelly (300 mg/kg/day, orally) for 30 successive days. Group 4: rats received celecoxib for 30 successive days, then rats were left untreated for another 30 days. Group 5: rats received celecoxib and RJ for 30 successive days, then rats were left untreated for another 30 days.

Results: Long-term celecoxib administration caused significant elevation in kidney function tests, with ameliorative effects of RJ against celecoxib-induced renal toxicity.

Conclusion: Long-term celecoxib administration caused renal toxicity in male albino rats, with ameliorative effects of RJ.

背景:塞来昔布是一种 COX-2 非甾体抗炎药(NSAID):塞来昔布是一种 COX-2 非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)。它被广泛用于治疗骨关节炎、类风湿性关节炎和强直性脊柱炎:本研究旨在探讨长期服用塞来昔布对雄性白化大鼠肾脏的影响,并研究停止治疗对这些组织的潜在影响。研究还探讨了蜂王浆(RJ)的所谓改善作用:将 50 只雄性白化大鼠分成 5 组,每组 10 只。第 1 组:大鼠不服药(对照组)。第 2 组:大鼠连续 30 天口服塞来昔布(50 毫克/千克/天)。第 3 组:大鼠连续 30 天口服塞来昔布(50 毫克/千克/天)和蜂王浆(300 毫克/千克/天)。第 4 组:连续 30 天给大鼠服用塞来昔布,然后再给大鼠服用 30 天。第 5 组:连续 30 天给大鼠服用塞来昔布和 RJ,然后再连续 30 天不给大鼠服用:结果:长期服用塞来昔布会导致肾功能检测指标显著升高,而 RJ 可改善塞来昔布引起的肾毒性:结论:长期服用塞来昔布会导致雄性白化大鼠肾脏中毒,而 RJ 具有改善作用。
{"title":"Royal Jelly, A Super Food, Protects Against Celecoxib-Induced Renal Toxicity in Adult Male Albino Rats.","authors":"Hesham A M I Khalifa, Naglaa Z H Eleiwa, Heba A Nazim","doi":"10.1177/20543581241235526","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20543581241235526","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Celecoxib is a COX-2 nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). It is widely used for the treatment of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore the effect of long-term administration of celecoxib on kidney of male albino rats, and to study the potential effect of treatment discontinuation on such tissues. The study also examined the alleged ameliorative effect of royal jelly (RJ).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty, male albino rats were divided into 5 equal groups; 10 each. Group 1: rats received no drug (control group). Group 2: rats received celecoxib (50 mg/kg/day, orally for 30 successive days). Group 3: rats received celecoxib (50 mg/kg/day, orally) and royal jelly (300 mg/kg/day, orally) for 30 successive days. Group 4: rats received celecoxib for 30 successive days, then rats were left untreated for another 30 days. Group 5: rats received celecoxib and RJ for 30 successive days, then rats were left untreated for another 30 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Long-term celecoxib administration caused significant elevation in kidney function tests, with ameliorative effects of RJ against celecoxib-induced renal toxicity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-term celecoxib administration caused renal toxicity in male albino rats, with ameliorative effects of RJ.</p>","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"11 ","pages":"20543581241235526"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10929035/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140112587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Acute Health Care Utilization Between Patients Receiving In-Center Hemodialysis and the General Population: A Population-Based Matched Cohort Study From Ontario, Canada. 中心内血液透析患者与普通人群使用急诊医疗服务情况的比较:加拿大安大略省基于人口的匹配队列研究》。
IF 1.7 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-03-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/20543581241231426
Kyla L Naylor, Marlee Vinegar, Peter G Blake, Sarah Bota, Bin Luo, Amit X Garg, Jane Ip, Angie Yeung, Joanie Gingras, Anas Aziz, Carina Iskander, Phil McFarlane
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis have multiple comorbidities and are at high risk of presenting to the hospital. However, the incidence and cost of acute health care utilization in the in-center hemodialysis population and how this compares with other populations is poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the rate, pattern, and cost of emergency department visits and hospitalizations in patients receiving in-center hemodialysis compared with a matched general population.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Population-based matched cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>We used linked administrative health care databases from Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>We included 25 379 patients (incident and prevalent) receiving in-center hemodialysis between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2018. Patients were matched on birth date (±2 years), sex, and cohort entry date using a 1:4 ratio to 101 516 individuals from the general population.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Our primary outcomes were emergency department visits (allowing for multiple visits per individual) and hospital admissions from the emergency department. We also assessed all-cause hospitalizations, all-cause readmissions within 30 days of discharge from the original hospitalization, length of stay for hospital admissions (including multiple visits per individual), and the financial cost of these admissions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We presented the rate, percentage, median (25th, 75th percentiles), and incidence rate per 1000 person-years for emergency department visits and hospitalizations. Individual-level health care costs for emergency department visits and all-cause hospitalization were estimated using resource intensity weights multiplied by the cost per weighted case.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients receiving in-center hemodialysis had substantially more comorbidities (eg, diabetes) than the matched general population. Eighty percent (n = 20 309) of patients receiving in-center hemodialysis had at least 1 emergency department visit compared with 56% (n = 56 452) of individuals in the matched general population, over a median follow-up of 1.8 years (25th, 75th percentiles: 0.7, 3.6) and 5.2 (2.5, 8.4) years, respectively. The incidence rate of emergency department visits, allowing for multiple visits per individual, was 2274 per 1000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2263, 2286) for patients receiving in-center hemodialysis, which was almost 5 times as high as the matched general population (471 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI: 469, 473). The rate of hospital admissions from the emergency department and the rate of all-cause hospital admissions in the in-center hemodialysis population was more than 7 times as high as the matched general population (hospital admissions from the emergency department: 786 vs 101 per 1000 person-years; all-cause hospital admissions: 105
背景:接受维持性血液透析的患者有多种并发症,入院风险很高。然而,人们对中心内血液透析患者使用急诊医疗服务的发生率和费用以及与其他人群的比较情况知之甚少:与匹配的普通人群相比,确定中心内血液透析患者的急诊就诊率、模式和住院费用:设计:基于人群的匹配队列研究:我们使用了加拿大安大略省的链接行政医疗保健数据库:我们纳入了 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间接受中心内血液透析的 25 379 名患者(偶发和流行)。患者的出生日期(±2岁)、性别和队列入组日期与普通人群中的101 516人按1:4的比例进行匹配:我们的主要结果是急诊就诊率(允许每人多次就诊)和急诊入院率。我们还评估了全因住院、出院后 30 天内全因再住院、住院时间(包括每人多次就诊)以及这些住院的经济成本:我们列出了急诊科就诊和住院的比率、百分比、中位数(第 25 位和第 75 位百分位数)以及每千人年的发病率。使用资源强度权重乘以每个加权病例的成本,估算出急诊就诊和全因住院的个人医疗成本:结果:与匹配的普通人群相比,接受中心血液透析的患者合并症(如糖尿病)要多得多。在中位随访 1.8 年(第 25、75 百分位数:0.7、3.6)和 5.2 年(2.5、8.4)期间,80%(n = 20 309)接受中心内血液透析的患者至少去过一次急诊室,而在匹配的普通人群中,这一比例为 56%(n = 56 452)。考虑到每人多次就诊,接受中心内血液透析的患者的急诊就诊率为每千人年 2274 人次(95% 置信区间 [CI]:2263, 2286),几乎是匹配的普通人群(每千人年 471 人次;95% CI:469, 473)的 5 倍。中心内血液透析患者的急诊入院率和全因入院率是相匹配的普通人群的 7 倍多(急诊入院率:786 人/每千人年 vs 101 人/每千人年):786 vs 101/1000人-年;全因住院率:1056 vs 139/1000人-年:1056 对 139/1000)。中心内血液透析患者每年全因住院天数的中位数为 4.0 天(0,16.5 天),而匹配的普通人群为 0 天(0,0.5 天)。在中心内血液透析人群中,每名患者每年的急诊就诊费用约为匹配普通人群的 5.5 倍,而中心内血液透析人群的住院费用约为匹配普通人群的 11 倍(急诊就诊费用:1153 加元对 2020 加元):1153 加元对 209 加元;住院费用:局限性:局限性:外部普遍性,我们无法确定急诊就诊和住院治疗是否可以预防:结论:接受中心内血液透析的患者在急性期的医疗使用率很高。这些结果加深了我们对中心内血液透析人群的疾病负担和相关费用的了解,强调了改善急性期治疗效果的必要性,并有助于医疗能力规划。在控制了患者的合并症后,还需要进行更多的研究来解决住院风险问题:由于这是一项基于人群的匹配队列研究,而非临床试验,因此不适用。
{"title":"Comparison of Acute Health Care Utilization Between Patients Receiving In-Center Hemodialysis and the General Population: A Population-Based Matched Cohort Study From Ontario, Canada.","authors":"Kyla L Naylor, Marlee Vinegar, Peter G Blake, Sarah Bota, Bin Luo, Amit X Garg, Jane Ip, Angie Yeung, Joanie Gingras, Anas Aziz, Carina Iskander, Phil McFarlane","doi":"10.1177/20543581241231426","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20543581241231426","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background: &lt;/strong&gt;Patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis have multiple comorbidities and are at high risk of presenting to the hospital. However, the incidence and cost of acute health care utilization in the in-center hemodialysis population and how this compares with other populations is poorly understood.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To determine the rate, pattern, and cost of emergency department visits and hospitalizations in patients receiving in-center hemodialysis compared with a matched general population.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Design: &lt;/strong&gt;Population-based matched cohort study.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Setting: &lt;/strong&gt;We used linked administrative health care databases from Ontario, Canada.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Patients: &lt;/strong&gt;We included 25 379 patients (incident and prevalent) receiving in-center hemodialysis between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2018. Patients were matched on birth date (±2 years), sex, and cohort entry date using a 1:4 ratio to 101 516 individuals from the general population.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Measurements: &lt;/strong&gt;Our primary outcomes were emergency department visits (allowing for multiple visits per individual) and hospital admissions from the emergency department. We also assessed all-cause hospitalizations, all-cause readmissions within 30 days of discharge from the original hospitalization, length of stay for hospital admissions (including multiple visits per individual), and the financial cost of these admissions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;We presented the rate, percentage, median (25th, 75th percentiles), and incidence rate per 1000 person-years for emergency department visits and hospitalizations. Individual-level health care costs for emergency department visits and all-cause hospitalization were estimated using resource intensity weights multiplied by the cost per weighted case.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;Patients receiving in-center hemodialysis had substantially more comorbidities (eg, diabetes) than the matched general population. Eighty percent (n = 20 309) of patients receiving in-center hemodialysis had at least 1 emergency department visit compared with 56% (n = 56 452) of individuals in the matched general population, over a median follow-up of 1.8 years (25th, 75th percentiles: 0.7, 3.6) and 5.2 (2.5, 8.4) years, respectively. The incidence rate of emergency department visits, allowing for multiple visits per individual, was 2274 per 1000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2263, 2286) for patients receiving in-center hemodialysis, which was almost 5 times as high as the matched general population (471 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI: 469, 473). The rate of hospital admissions from the emergency department and the rate of all-cause hospital admissions in the in-center hemodialysis population was more than 7 times as high as the matched general population (hospital admissions from the emergency department: 786 vs 101 per 1000 person-years; all-cause hospital admissions: 105","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"11 ","pages":"20543581241231426"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10916490/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140048807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implementation of a One-Day Living Kidney Donor Assessment Clinic to Improve the Efficiency of the Living Kidney Donor Evaluation: Program Report. 实施一日活体肾脏捐献者评估门诊,提高活体肾脏捐献者评估效率:计划报告。
IF 1.7 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-02-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/20543581241231462
Seychelle Yohanna, Kyla L Naylor, Jessica M Sontrop, Christine M Ribic, Catherine M Clase, Matthew C Miller, Sunchit Madan, Richard Hae, Jasper Ho, Jian Roushani, Sarah Parfeniuk, Melodie Jansen, Sharon Shavel, Michelle Richter, Kimberly Young, Brooke Cowell, Shahid Lambe, Peter Margetts, Kevin Piercey, Vikas Tandon, Colm Boylan, Carol Wang, Susan McKenzie, Barb Longo, Amit X Garg
<p><strong>Purpose of program: </strong>A key barrier to becoming a living kidney donor is an inefficient evaluation process, requiring more than 30 tests (eg, laboratory and diagnostic tests), questionnaires, and specialist consultations. Donor candidates make several trips to hospitals and clinics, and often spend months waiting for appointments and test results. The median evaluation time for a donor candidate in Ontario, Canada, is nearly 1 year. Longer wait times are associated with poorer outcomes for the kidney transplant recipient and higher health care costs. A shorter, more efficient donor evaluation process may help more patients with kidney failure receive a transplant, including a pre-emptive kidney transplant (ie, avoiding the need for dialysis). In this report, we describe the development of a quality improvement intervention to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and patient-centeredness of the donor candidate evaluation process. We developed a One-Day Living Kidney Donor Assessment Clinic, a condensed clinic where interested donor candidates complete all testing and consultations within 1 day.</p><p><strong>Sources of information: </strong>The One-Day Living Kidney Donor Assessment Clinic was developed after performing a comprehensive review of the literature, receiving feedback from patients who have successfully donated, and meetings with transplant program leadership from St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton. A multistakeholder team was formed that included health care staff from nephrology, transplant surgery, radiology, cardiology, social work, nuclear medicine, and patients with the prior lived experience of kidney donation. In the planning stages, the team met regularly to determine the objectives of the clinic, criteria for participation, clinic schedule, patient flow, and clinic metrics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Donor candidates entered the One-Day Clinic if they completed initial laboratory testing and agreed to an expedited process. If additional testing was required, it was completed on a different day. Donor candidates were reviewed by the nephrologist, transplant surgeon, and donor coordinator approximately 2 weeks after the clinic for final approval. The team continues to meet regularly to review donor feedback, discuss challenges, and brainstorm solutions.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>The One-Day Clinic was implemented in March 2019, and has now been running for 4 years, making iterative improvements through continuous patient and provider feedback. To date, we have evaluated more than 150 donor candidates in this clinic. Feedback from donors has been uniformly positive (98% of donors stated they were very satisfied with the clinic), with most noting that the clinic was efficient and minimally impacted work and family obligations. Hospital leadership, including the health care professionals from each participating department, continue to show support and collaborate to create a seamless experience fo
计划的目的:成为活体肾脏捐献者的一个主要障碍是评估程序效率低下,需要进行 30 多项检查(如实验室检查和诊断性检查)、问卷调查和专家会诊。捐献者候选人要多次往返医院和诊所,往往要花费数月时间等待预约和检查结果。在加拿大安大略省,捐献者候选人的评估时间中位数接近 1 年。等待时间越长,肾移植受者的治疗效果越差,医疗费用也越高。更短、更高效的捐献者评估流程可以帮助更多肾衰竭患者接受移植,包括先期肾移植(即避免透析)。在本报告中,我们介绍了为提高捐赠者候选人评估流程的效率、有效性和以患者为中心而开发的质量改进干预措施。我们开发了 "一日活体肾脏捐献者评估门诊",这是一个浓缩门诊,感兴趣的捐献者候选人可在一天内完成所有测试和咨询:一日活体肾脏捐献者评估门诊是在对文献进行全面审查、从成功捐献的患者处获得反馈意见并与圣约瑟夫汉密尔顿医疗保健中心的移植项目领导层会面后开发的。我们成立了一个多利益相关者团队,成员包括肾脏内科、移植手术科、放射科、心脏病科、社会工作科、核医学科的医护人员以及有肾脏捐献亲身经历的患者。在计划阶段,该小组定期召开会议,以确定诊所的目标、参与标准、诊所时间表、患者流量和诊所指标:方法:捐献者候选人如果完成了初步实验室检测并同意加快流程,就可以进入 "一日门诊"。如果需要额外检测,则在不同的日期完成。捐献者候选人在门诊结束约两周后由肾病专家、移植外科医生和捐献者协调员进行审核,以获得最终批准。该团队继续定期召开会议,审查捐献者的反馈意见,讨论面临的挑战,并集思广益寻求解决方案:一日门诊 "于 2019 年 3 月开始实施,至今已运行 4 年,并通过患者和提供者的持续反馈不断改进。迄今为止,我们已在该诊所评估了 150 多名捐献者候选人。捐献者的反馈一致是积极的(98% 的捐献者表示他们对诊所非常满意),大多数捐献者指出诊所效率高,对工作和家庭的影响最小。医院领导层,包括各参与部门的医护人员,将继续给予支持并通力合作,为参加 "一日门诊 "的捐献者候选人创造完美的体验:诊所名额有限,这意味着一些有兴趣的捐献者可能无法在当月参加 "一日诊所":这种以患者为中心的质量改进干预措施旨在提高活体肾脏捐献者评估的效率和体验,为肾移植受者带来更好的结果,并有可能增加活体捐献。我们下一步将对该诊所进行正式评估,衡量在诊所工作的医护人员和参加诊所的捐献者候选人的定性反馈,并衡量完成一天评估的捐献者候选人与接受常规护理评估的捐献者候选人的主要过程和结果。该项目评估将提供可靠的、与地区相关的证据,为全国各地的移植中心考虑采用类似的一日评估模式提供参考。
{"title":"Implementation of a One-Day Living Kidney Donor Assessment Clinic to Improve the Efficiency of the Living Kidney Donor Evaluation: Program Report.","authors":"Seychelle Yohanna, Kyla L Naylor, Jessica M Sontrop, Christine M Ribic, Catherine M Clase, Matthew C Miller, Sunchit Madan, Richard Hae, Jasper Ho, Jian Roushani, Sarah Parfeniuk, Melodie Jansen, Sharon Shavel, Michelle Richter, Kimberly Young, Brooke Cowell, Shahid Lambe, Peter Margetts, Kevin Piercey, Vikas Tandon, Colm Boylan, Carol Wang, Susan McKenzie, Barb Longo, Amit X Garg","doi":"10.1177/20543581241231462","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20543581241231462","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Purpose of program: &lt;/strong&gt;A key barrier to becoming a living kidney donor is an inefficient evaluation process, requiring more than 30 tests (eg, laboratory and diagnostic tests), questionnaires, and specialist consultations. Donor candidates make several trips to hospitals and clinics, and often spend months waiting for appointments and test results. The median evaluation time for a donor candidate in Ontario, Canada, is nearly 1 year. Longer wait times are associated with poorer outcomes for the kidney transplant recipient and higher health care costs. A shorter, more efficient donor evaluation process may help more patients with kidney failure receive a transplant, including a pre-emptive kidney transplant (ie, avoiding the need for dialysis). In this report, we describe the development of a quality improvement intervention to improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and patient-centeredness of the donor candidate evaluation process. We developed a One-Day Living Kidney Donor Assessment Clinic, a condensed clinic where interested donor candidates complete all testing and consultations within 1 day.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sources of information: &lt;/strong&gt;The One-Day Living Kidney Donor Assessment Clinic was developed after performing a comprehensive review of the literature, receiving feedback from patients who have successfully donated, and meetings with transplant program leadership from St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton. A multistakeholder team was formed that included health care staff from nephrology, transplant surgery, radiology, cardiology, social work, nuclear medicine, and patients with the prior lived experience of kidney donation. In the planning stages, the team met regularly to determine the objectives of the clinic, criteria for participation, clinic schedule, patient flow, and clinic metrics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;Donor candidates entered the One-Day Clinic if they completed initial laboratory testing and agreed to an expedited process. If additional testing was required, it was completed on a different day. Donor candidates were reviewed by the nephrologist, transplant surgeon, and donor coordinator approximately 2 weeks after the clinic for final approval. The team continues to meet regularly to review donor feedback, discuss challenges, and brainstorm solutions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Key findings: &lt;/strong&gt;The One-Day Clinic was implemented in March 2019, and has now been running for 4 years, making iterative improvements through continuous patient and provider feedback. To date, we have evaluated more than 150 donor candidates in this clinic. Feedback from donors has been uniformly positive (98% of donors stated they were very satisfied with the clinic), with most noting that the clinic was efficient and minimally impacted work and family obligations. Hospital leadership, including the health care professionals from each participating department, continue to show support and collaborate to create a seamless experience fo","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"11 ","pages":"20543581241231462"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10896046/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139971019","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Glomerular Disease: A Narrative Review of the Epidemiology, Mechanisms, Management, and Patient Priorities. 肾小球疾病患者的心血管风险:关于流行病学、机制、管理和患者优先事项的叙述性综述。
IF 1.7 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-02-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/20543581241232472
Robert L Myette, Caroline Lamarche, Ayodele Odutayo, Nancy Verdin, Mark Canney

Purpose of review: Cardiovascular (CV) disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality for patients with glomerular disease. Despite the fact that mechanisms underpinning CV disease risk in this population are likely distinct from other forms of kidney disease, treatment and preventive strategies tend to be extrapolated from studies of patients with undifferentiated chronic kidney disease (CKD). There is an unmet need to delineate the pathophysiology of CV disease in patients with glomerular disease, establish unique risk factors, and identify novel therapeutic targets for disease prevention. The aims of this narrative review are to summarize the existing knowledge regarding the epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, and management of CV disease in patients with common glomerular disease, highlight the patient perspective, and propose specific areas for future study.

Sources of information: The literature for this narrative review was accessed using common research search engines, including PubMed, PubMed Central, Medline, and Google Scholar. Information for the patient perspective section was collected through iterative discussions with a patient partner.

Methods: We reviewed the epidemiology, molecular mechanisms of disease, management approaches, and the patient perspective in relation to CV disease in patients with glomerulopathies. Throughout, we have highlighted the current knowledge and have discussed future research approaches, both clinical and translational, while integrating the patient perspective.

Key findings: Patients with glomerular disease have significant CV disease risk driven by multifactorial, molecular mechanisms originating from their glomerular disease but complicated by existing comorbidities, kidney disease, and medication side effects. The current approach to risk stratification and treatment relies heavily on existing data from CKD patients, but this may not always be appropriate given the unique pathophysiology and mechanisms associated with CV disease risk in patients with glomerular disease. We highlight the need for ongoing glomerular disease-focused studies aimed to better delineate CV disease risk, while integrating the patient perspective.

Limitations: This is a narrative review and does not represent a comprehensive and systematic review of the literature.

审查目的:心血管(CV)疾病是肾小球疾病患者发病和死亡的主要原因。尽管这一人群的心血管疾病风险机制可能不同于其他形式的肾脏疾病,但治疗和预防策略往往是从对未分化慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)患者的研究中推断出来的。目前尚需明确肾小球疾病患者心血管疾病的病理生理学、确定独特的风险因素并确定新的疾病预防治疗靶点。本综述旨在总结常见肾小球疾病患者心血管疾病的流行病学、分子机制和管理方面的现有知识,强调患者的观点,并提出未来研究的具体领域:本叙述性综述的文献资料通过常用的研究搜索引擎获取,包括 PubMed、PubMed Central、Medline 和 Google Scholar。病人视角部分的信息是通过与病人伙伴反复讨论收集的:我们回顾了肾小球疾病患者的流行病学、疾病的分子机制、管理方法以及与心血管疾病相关的患者观点。自始至终,我们强调了当前的知识,并讨论了未来的临床和转化研究方法,同时结合了患者的观点:主要发现:肾小球疾病患者具有显著的心血管疾病风险,这种风险是由肾小球疾病引起的多因素分子机制驱动的,但现有的合并症、肾脏疾病和药物副作用又使这种风险变得复杂。目前的风险分层和治疗方法在很大程度上依赖于慢性肾脏病患者的现有数据,但考虑到肾小球疾病患者与心血管疾病风险相关的独特病理生理学和机制,这种方法并不总是合适的。我们强调有必要持续开展以肾小球疾病为重点的研究,以便更好地界定心血管疾病风险,同时结合患者的观点:本文只是一篇叙述性综述,并不代表全面系统的文献综述。
{"title":"Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Glomerular Disease: A Narrative Review of the Epidemiology, Mechanisms, Management, and Patient Priorities.","authors":"Robert L Myette, Caroline Lamarche, Ayodele Odutayo, Nancy Verdin, Mark Canney","doi":"10.1177/20543581241232472","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20543581241232472","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Cardiovascular (CV) disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality for patients with glomerular disease. Despite the fact that mechanisms underpinning CV disease risk in this population are likely distinct from other forms of kidney disease, treatment and preventive strategies tend to be extrapolated from studies of patients with undifferentiated chronic kidney disease (CKD). There is an unmet need to delineate the pathophysiology of CV disease in patients with glomerular disease, establish unique risk factors, and identify novel therapeutic targets for disease prevention. The aims of this narrative review are to summarize the existing knowledge regarding the epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, and management of CV disease in patients with common glomerular disease, highlight the patient perspective, and propose specific areas for future study.</p><p><strong>Sources of information: </strong>The literature for this narrative review was accessed using common research search engines, including PubMed, PubMed Central, Medline, and Google Scholar. Information for the patient perspective section was collected through iterative discussions with a patient partner.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the epidemiology, molecular mechanisms of disease, management approaches, and the patient perspective in relation to CV disease in patients with glomerulopathies. Throughout, we have highlighted the current knowledge and have discussed future research approaches, both clinical and translational, while integrating the patient perspective.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Patients with glomerular disease have significant CV disease risk driven by multifactorial, molecular mechanisms originating from their glomerular disease but complicated by existing comorbidities, kidney disease, and medication side effects. The current approach to risk stratification and treatment relies heavily on existing data from CKD patients, but this may not always be appropriate given the unique pathophysiology and mechanisms associated with CV disease risk in patients with glomerular disease. We highlight the need for ongoing glomerular disease-focused studies aimed to better delineate CV disease risk, while integrating the patient perspective.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This is a narrative review and does not represent a comprehensive and systematic review of the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"11 ","pages":"20543581241232472"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10894549/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139971018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Large Kidney Cysts in HNF1B Nephropathy Mimicking Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease. 模仿常染色体显性多囊肾病的 HNF1B 肾病大肾囊肿
IF 1.7 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-02-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI: 10.1177/20543581241232470
Nada Alamri, Matthew B Lanktree

Rationale: Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 beta (HNF1B) nephropathy is a rare autosomal dominant monogenic kidney disease. We present a case mimicking autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), highlighting the phenotypic heterogeneity of HNF1B-related disease.

Presenting concerns of the patient: A 37-year-old man presented with hypertensive urgency, accompanied by flank pain and abdominal distension. Despite the absence of familial kidney disease, imaging revealed large bilateral kidney cysts resembling ADPKD.

Diagnosis: We initially suspected de novo ADPKD. However, negative genetic testing results for PKD1 and PKD2 led to a 43-gene cystic kidney sequencing panel which identified a deletion encompassing the entire HNF1B gene.

Intervention: To alleviate discomfort caused by the kidney cysts, ultrasound-guided aspiration and foam sclerotherapy were performed. Tolvaptan, used for treating high-risk ADPKD, was not prescribed after confirming the diagnosis was HNF1B nephropathy.

Outcomes: A diagnosis of HNF1B nephropathy was reached following gene panel testing. Abdominal symptoms improved following cyst aspiration and foam sclerotherapy.

Novel findings: HNF1B nephropathy has a variable presentation but can lead to cysts appearing like ADPKD. A 43-gene cystic kidney sequencing panel identified the diagnosis in this uncertain case.

理由:肝细胞核因子 1 beta(HNF1B)肾病是一种罕见的常染色体显性单基因肾病。我们介绍了一个模仿常染色体显性多囊肾病(ADPKD)的病例,突出了 HNF1B 相关疾病的表型异质性:一名 37 岁的男子因高血压急症就诊,伴有侧腹疼痛和腹胀。尽管没有家族性肾脏疾病,但影像学检查发现双侧肾脏大囊肿与 ADPKD 相似:我们最初怀疑是新发 ADPKD。然而,PKD1和PKD2基因检测结果呈阴性,因此我们进行了43个基因的囊性肾脏测序,结果发现HNF1B全基因缺失:为缓解肾囊肿引起的不适,患者接受了超声引导下的抽吸术和泡沫硬化疗法。在确诊为HNF1B肾病后,没有使用用于治疗高危ADPKD的托伐普坦:结果:经过基因组检测,确诊为HNF1B肾病。囊肿抽吸术和泡沫硬化疗法后,腹部症状有所改善:新发现:HNF1B肾病的表现不一,但可导致类似ADPKD的囊肿。43个基因的囊性肾脏测序小组确定了这一不确定病例的诊断。
{"title":"Large Kidney Cysts in <i>HNF1B</i> Nephropathy Mimicking Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.","authors":"Nada Alamri, Matthew B Lanktree","doi":"10.1177/20543581241232470","DOIUrl":"10.1177/20543581241232470","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 beta (<i>HNF1B</i>) nephropathy is a rare autosomal dominant monogenic kidney disease. We present a case mimicking autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), highlighting the phenotypic heterogeneity of <i>HNF1B</i>-related disease.</p><p><strong>Presenting concerns of the patient: </strong>A 37-year-old man presented with hypertensive urgency, accompanied by flank pain and abdominal distension. Despite the absence of familial kidney disease, imaging revealed large bilateral kidney cysts resembling ADPKD.</p><p><strong>Diagnosis: </strong>We initially suspected de novo ADPKD. However, negative genetic testing results for <i>PKD1</i> and <i>PKD2</i> led to a 43-gene cystic kidney sequencing panel which identified a deletion encompassing the entire <i>HNF1B</i> gene.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>To alleviate discomfort caused by the kidney cysts, ultrasound-guided aspiration and foam sclerotherapy were performed. Tolvaptan, used for treating high-risk ADPKD, was not prescribed after confirming the diagnosis was <i>HNF1B</i> nephropathy.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>A diagnosis of <i>HNF1B</i> nephropathy was reached following gene panel testing. Abdominal symptoms improved following cyst aspiration and foam sclerotherapy.</p><p><strong>Novel findings: </strong><i>HNF1B</i> nephropathy has a variable presentation but can lead to cysts appearing like ADPKD. A 43-gene cystic kidney sequencing panel identified the diagnosis in this uncertain case.</p>","PeriodicalId":9426,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease","volume":"11 ","pages":"20543581241232470"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10874158/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139899390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1