Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease最新文献

Rationale: Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 beta (HNF1B) nephropathy is a rare autosomal dominant monogenic kidney disease. We present a case mimicking autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), highlighting the phenotypic heterogeneity of HNF1B-related disease.

Presenting concerns of the patient: A 37-year-old man presented with hypertensive urgency, accompanied by flank pain and abdominal distension. Despite the absence of familial kidney disease, imaging revealed large bilateral kidney cysts resembling ADPKD.

Diagnosis: We initially suspected de novo ADPKD. However, negative genetic testing results for PKD1 and PKD2 led to a 43-gene cystic kidney sequencing panel which identified a deletion encompassing the entire HNF1B gene.

Intervention: To alleviate discomfort caused by the kidney cysts, ultrasound-guided aspiration and foam sclerotherapy were performed. Tolvaptan, used for treating high-risk ADPKD, was not prescribed after confirming the diagnosis was HNF1B nephropathy.

Outcomes: A diagnosis of HNF1B nephropathy was reached following gene panel testing. Abdominal symptoms improved following cyst aspiration and foam sclerotherapy.

Novel findings: HNF1B nephropathy has a variable presentation but can lead to cysts appearing like ADPKD. A 43-gene cystic kidney sequencing panel identified the diagnosis in this uncertain case.

Purpose of the review: The purpose of the review is to discuss current proven benefits and problems of integrating exercise in the care of people receiving dialysis by reviewing literature from the last few years and identifying important questions that still need to be asked and answered.

Methods: A focused review and appraisal of the literature were done. Original peer-reviewed articles, review articles, opinion pieces and guidelines were identified from PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Only sources in English were accessed. Search terms "exercise" and "dialysis" were used to find active recruiting randomized trials in various clinical trial registry platforms.

Key findings: Numerous studies have demonstrated the benefits of exercise training in individuals receiving dialysis, limited by factors such as short duration of follow-up and inconsistent adverse event reporting and outcomes selected. Notable gaps in exercise research in dialysis include ways to maintain programs and patient motivation, studies in peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis patients, and how best to define and measure outcomes of interest.

Implications: This review summarizes the current state of exercise in people receiving dialysis and serves as a call to action to conduct large, randomized controlled trials to improve the quality of evidence needed to implement and sustain innovative, exercise interventions, and programs for this population.

Background: Kidney transplant recipients are commonly prescribed proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), but due to concern for polypharmacy, chronic use should be limited.

Objective: The objective was to describe PPI use in kidney transplant recipients beyond their first year of transplant to better inform and support deprescribing initiatives.

Design: We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study using linked health care databases.

Setting: This study was conducted in Alberta, Canada.

Patients: We included all prevalent adult, kidney-only transplant recipients between April 2008 and December 2017 who received their transplant between May 2002 and December 2017.

Measurements: The primary outcome was ongoing or new PPI use and patterns of use, including frequency and duration of therapy, and assessment of indication for PPI use.

Methods: We ascertained baseline characteristics, covariate information, and outcome data from the Alberta Kidney Disease Network (AKDN). We compared recipients with evidence of a PPI prescription in the 3 months prior to study entry to those with a histamine-2-receptor antagonist (H2Ra) fill and those with neither.

Results: We identified 1823 kidney transplant recipients, of whom 868 (48%) were on a PPI, 215 (12%) were on an H2Ra, and 740 (41%) were on neither at baseline. Over a median follow-up of 5.4 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 2.6-9.3), there were almost 45 000 unique PPI prescriptions dispensed, the majority (80%) of which were filled by initial PPI users. Recipients who were on a PPI at baseline would spend 91% (IQR = 70-98) of their graft survival time on a PPI in follow-up, and nephrologists were the main prescribers. We identified an indication for ongoing PPI use in 54% of recipients with the most common indication being concurrent antiplatelet use (26%).

Limitations: Our kidney transplant recipients have access to universal health care coverage which may limit generalizability. We identified common gastrointestinal indications for PPI use but did not include rare conditions due to concerns about the validity of diagnostic codes. In addition, symptoms suggestive of reflux may not be well coded as the focus of follow-up visits is more likely to focus on kidney transplant.

Conclusions: Many kidney transplant recipients are prescribed a PPI at, or beyond, the 1-year post-transplant date and are likely to stay on a PPI in follow-up. Almost half of the recipients in our study did not have an identifiable indication for ongoing PPI use. Nephrologists frequently prescribe PPIs to kidney transplant recipients and should be involved in deprescribing initiatives to reduce polypharmacy.

Background: It can be difficult for kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) to be physically active after their transplantation. Physical inactivity is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, one of the leading cause of death among KTRs. To help KTRs start and maintain a physical activity routine, we developed the KEeP ACTIVe Club, a 6-month online intervention with access to a kinesiologist, a patient partner, and a private support group with an online platform (Facebook).

Objective: The objective of this study was to capture the participants' experiences of the KEeP ACTIVe Club.

Design: Individual interviews.

Setting: The Center hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) and the McGill University Health Center (MUHC) kidney transplant programs.

Participants: Kidney transplant recipients who participated in the KEeP ACTIVe Club.

Methods: Between October and December 2021, we conducted 11 individual semi-directed interviews with KTRs from 2 urban kidney transplant programs who participated in the KEeP ACTIVe Club. The interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was conducted.

Results: Participants' principal motivation to participate in the KEeP ACTIVe Club was to improve their physical fitness following their transplant in a pandemic period. One of the main benefits of the KEeP ACTIVe Club was the improvement of participant's self-confidence and the knowledge gained regarding exercises adapted to their reality as KTRs. However, the small number of participants and the schedules of classes offered were viewed as a pitfall of the current intervention. Finally, the peer mentoring and support gained by other participants were important and viewed as highly impactful aspects of the KEeP ACTIVe Club.

Limitations: Only 11 of the 18 patients who participated in the KEeP ACTIVe Club took part in the interviews.

Conclusion: Participants reported a positive experience with the KEeP ACTIVe Club. Peer mentoring and support gained from other participants seem to be essential aspects of the experience within the KEeP ACTIVe Club. This program is a good avenue to offer in post-transplant care to help KTRs to be more active and to connect with other patients.

Purpose of review: Precision tools that ensure molecular compatibility can help prevent rejection and improve kidney transplantation outcomes. However, these tools will generate controversy because they are perceived to and can in fact impact equity in the ethics of allocation. They may also affect the extent to which physicians can advocate for their patient fiduciaries, as generally required by Canadian professional ethics and law.

Sources of information: Electronic databases such as Google Scholar and PubMed were searched for peer-reviewed literature, and Google search engine was used to identify the news articles, jurisprudence, legal information, and other relevant websites cited.

Methods: We discuss controversies precision transplantation tools will likely generate, consider what challenges will arise from their implementation, and provide recommendations of avenues and content for communication to address these issues.

Key findings: Communication about the translation of new precision tools will be challenging as media portrayals of transplantation often focus on individual narratives about access to transplantation and fail to center the issues of utility, allocation, and rejection. Incomplete portrayals of this nature will need to be countered with explanations of how new precision tools can be of net benefit when implemented equitably, as maintaining trust in the donation and transplantation system is key.

Limitations: Our manuscript focuses on precision medicine applications pertaining to the implementation of molecular compatibility in transplantation. Distinct communication content and avenues may need to be considered in other contexts.

Implications: Clear, accurate, and strategic communication is key to managing translation of precision medicine tools. For this purpose, we provide detailed recommendations for stakeholder engagement, content, and avenues for communicating about precision transplantation tools.

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with a lower serologic response to vaccination compared to the general population. There is limited information regarding the serologic response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in the non-dialysis-dependent CKD (NDD-CKD) population, particularly after the third dose and whether this response varies by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

Methods: The NDD-CKD (G1-G5) patients who received 3 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were recruited from renal clinics within British Columbia and Ontario, Canada. Between August 27, 2021, and November 30, 2022, blood samples were collected serially for serological testing every 3 months within a 9-month follow-up period. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) anti-spike, anti-receptor binding domain (RBD), and anti-nucleocapsid protein (NP) levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Results: Among 285 NDD-CKD patients, the median age was 67 (interquartile range [IQR], 52-77) years, 58% were men, 48% received BNT162b2 as their third dose, 22% were on immunosuppressive treatment, and COVID-19 infection by anti-NP seropositivity was observed in 37 of 285 (13%) patients. Following the third dose, anti-spike and anti-RBD levels peaked at 2 months, with geometric mean levels at 1131 and 1672 binding antibody units per milliliter (BAU/mL), respectively, and seropositivity rates above 93% and 85%, respectively, over the 9-month follow-up period. There was no association between eGFR or urine albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) with mounting a robust antibody response or in antibody levels over time. The NDD-CKD patients on immunosuppressive treatment were less likely to mount a robust anti-spike response in univariable (odds ratio [OR] 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20, 0.93) and multivariable (OR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.25, 1.10) analyses. An interaction between age, immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody levels, and time was observed in both unadjusted (anti-spike: P = .005; anti-RBD: P = .03) and adjusted (anti-spike: P = .004; anti-RBD: P = .03) models, with older individuals having a more pronounced decline in antibody levels over time.

Conclusion: Most NDD-CKD patients were seropositive for anti-spike and anti-RBD after 3 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and we did not observe any differences in the antibody response by eGFR.