Singapore medical journal最新文献

Introduction: Myopericarditis is a rare but serious coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine-related adverse event primarily affecting adolescents. Given recent approvals for childhood vaccination, we performed a meta-analysis investigating myopericarditis following messenger ribonucleic acid COVID-19 vaccination in children aged <19 years, focusing on its overall risk and high-risk subgroups.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase and Scopus from inception to 1 August 2022 for observational studies reporting myopericarditis in temporal relation to paediatric COVID-19 vaccination. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses (DerSimonian and Laird) on myopericarditis (primary outcome), myocarditis and pericarditis (secondary outcomes).

Results: Of 2115 studies, 12 (59,229,160 doses) studies were included in our analysis. There were 19.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.4-37.6) myopericarditis cases reported per million doses in children, compared to 23.7 (95% CI: 12.2-46.1) cases in adults (eight studies, 376,899,888 doses; P = 0.70). Compared to the second dose (34.4, 95% CI: 15.2-77.8), the number of cases post-first dose was significantly lower (9.1, 95% CI: 4.4-18.8; P = 0.017), while the number of cases post-third dose was not higher than that of post-second dose (28.4, 95% CI: 10.4-61.8; P = 0.57, global P = 0.031). Males were at higher risk of myopericarditis (67.4, 95% CI: 36.5-124.5) than females (6.9, 95% CI: 3.1-15.3; P < 0.0001). Finally, the number of cases was higher (overall P < 0.0001) among children aged ≥12 years (39.9, 95% CI: 24.1-66.0) than among children aged <12 years (3.0, 95% CI: 2.3-3.9).

Conclusion: Our meta-analysis showed 19.8 cases of myopericarditis per million doses among children, not significantly different from that of adults. Higher risk subgroups included adolescents, males, and those receiving their second dose of vaccination.

Introduction: Intracranial large artery disease (ICLAD) is a common cause of ischaemic stroke and is associated with the risk of recurrent vascular events in the short term. We compared the incidence of various long-term vascular outcomes between ischaemic stroke patients with and without ICLAD.

Methods: This was a longitudinal observational study of acute ischaemic stroke patients who were followed up serially for recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction or vascular death up to a median of 86 months. Transcranial colour-coded Doppler was used in the diagnosis of ICLAD.

Results: Among the 581 ischaemic stroke patients studied (median age 63 ± 11 years, male 71%), 354 (60.9%) had ICLAD. In regression analyses adjusting for covariates, patients with ICLAD were more likely to have long-term composite vascular outcomes (hazard ratio [HR] 1.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-2.03, P = 0.041), myocardial infarction (HR 2.89, 95% CI 1.71-4.91, P < 0.001) and vascular death (HR 3.52, 95% CI 1.67-7.52, P = 0.001) but not recurrent stroke (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.72-1.70, P = 0.652), at a median of 86 months as compared to patients without ICLAD.

Conclusion: Our findings of poor prognostic impact of ICLAD on long-term recurrent vascular events after ischaemic stroke provide evidence for the need of specific, emphasised screening and secondary prevention, especially for coronary artery disease in this high-risk group.

Introduction: Hand tumours are frequently encountered in clinical practice. However, large-scale epidemiological data of soft tissue tumours in the hand are infrequently published. Epidemiological data provide diagnostic cues to guide the workup and management of hand tumours. Assessing significant independent demographic factors and tumour characteristics associated with hand tumours is essential in health care.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients who underwent excision of hand tumours in Singapore General Hospital between 2004 and 2015 was conducted. The data collected included age, gender, ethnicity, histological diagnosis, malignancy and location of tumour. Generalised linear latent and mixed models (GLLAMM) analyses were performed.

Results: A total of 4476 tumours were identified from 4226 patients with a mean age of 51.3 (range 8-101) years and male to female ratio of 1 to 1.15. Most patients were Chinese (75%), followed by Malay (9%), Indian (8%) and others (8%). The most common hand tumours excised were ganglions (43%) (majority in the wrist), followed by giant cell tumours (9%) (commonly in the digits). Most soft tissue tumours were benign (97%), with only 3% of malignant cases. The GLLAMM analyses revealed further potential factors on the status of malignancy, tumour origin and tumour location.

Conclusion: Most soft tissue tumours in the hand and wrist are benign. This can guide workup and counselling of patients before the operation. While malignant tumours are uncommon, they have the potential for significant morbidity and mortality if not appropriately evaluated or treated. The application of GLLAMM analyses showed that age, ethnicity and gender were significant predictors of malignancy.