Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-09-27DOI: 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2025-189
Anyi Audrey Zhang, Ching-Hui Sia, Kian Keong Poh
{"title":"World Heart Day 2025: Don't Miss a Beat - bridging gaps in cardiovascular health for women, children and the future.","authors":"Anyi Audrey Zhang, Ching-Hui Sia, Kian Keong Poh","doi":"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2025-189","DOIUrl":"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2025-189","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94289,"journal":{"name":"Singapore medical journal","volume":"66 9","pages":"492-494"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503405/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145180859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-09-27DOI: 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2025-042
Peter Chiu-Leung Chow
{"title":"Keeping good documentation: the ethical and legal issues in medical records.","authors":"Peter Chiu-Leung Chow","doi":"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2025-042","DOIUrl":"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2025-042","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94289,"journal":{"name":"Singapore medical journal","volume":"66 9","pages":"517-521"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12503401/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145180752","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-27DOI: 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2025-011
Stephanie Tze Hui Ong, Pei Lin Hu, Eileen Yi Ling Koh, Ang Tee Lim, Ivy Lim
Introduction: Physical activity has been shown to offer numerous benefits in improving mortality and morbidity outcomes. However, the specifics of advising and/or prescribing exercise in patient management may not be taught comprehensively in undergraduate and postgraduate medical curriculum. This study aimed to evaluate primary care physicians' habits in advising and/or prescribing exercise to their patients.
Methods: Primary care physicians practising in all public primary care clinics in Singapore were invited via email and posters to participate in an anonymous online questionnaire. The questionnaire explored physicians' habits in advising and/or prescribing exercise to their patients.
Results: Results showed that 95.9% of primary care physicians gave patients advice on exercise. However, only 24.7% prescribed exercise (specific written instructions) to their patients. Time constraint is the top barrier cited by primary care physicians for not giving exercise advice and/or prescription. The top three conditions for which exercise advice and/or prescription was given by physicians were diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia and hypertension. Physicians who cited insufficient expertise/knowledge as a barrier were more likely to have never attended an exercise prescription course.
Conclusion: Most primary care physicians in Singapore advised exercise as part of the management plan for their patients. However, a much lower proportion gave specific exercise prescription. The most commonly cited barrier to advising or prescribing exercise is time constraint, while lack of expertise or knowledge may stem from not having received relevant training. Future efforts could focus on providing primary care physicians with targeted training to overcome the barrier of insufficient expertise or knowledge in exercise advice and prescription.
{"title":"Are primary care physicians in Singapore prescribing the best medicine - physical activity?","authors":"Stephanie Tze Hui Ong, Pei Lin Hu, Eileen Yi Ling Koh, Ang Tee Lim, Ivy Lim","doi":"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2025-011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2025-011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physical activity has been shown to offer numerous benefits in improving mortality and morbidity outcomes. However, the specifics of advising and/or prescribing exercise in patient management may not be taught comprehensively in undergraduate and postgraduate medical curriculum. This study aimed to evaluate primary care physicians' habits in advising and/or prescribing exercise to their patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primary care physicians practising in all public primary care clinics in Singapore were invited via email and posters to participate in an anonymous online questionnaire. The questionnaire explored physicians' habits in advising and/or prescribing exercise to their patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that 95.9% of primary care physicians gave patients advice on exercise. However, only 24.7% prescribed exercise (specific written instructions) to their patients. Time constraint is the top barrier cited by primary care physicians for not giving exercise advice and/or prescription. The top three conditions for which exercise advice and/or prescription was given by physicians were diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia and hypertension. Physicians who cited insufficient expertise/knowledge as a barrier were more likely to have never attended an exercise prescription course.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most primary care physicians in Singapore advised exercise as part of the management plan for their patients. However, a much lower proportion gave specific exercise prescription. The most commonly cited barrier to advising or prescribing exercise is time constraint, while lack of expertise or knowledge may stem from not having received relevant training. Future efforts could focus on providing primary care physicians with targeted training to overcome the barrier of insufficient expertise or knowledge in exercise advice and prescription.</p>","PeriodicalId":94289,"journal":{"name":"Singapore medical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144984733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Ischaemic stroke is a major health burden. The aim of this observational study was to compare the incidence of ischaemic stroke between Muslims and non-Muslims living in southern Thailand.
Methods: Patients with nonrecurrent computed tomography-proven ischaemic stroke admitted to Yala Regional Hospital during the Hijri years (AH) 1435-1439 were recruited for the study. Demographic, religious and risk factor data (hypertension, diabetes mellitus), smoking and atrial fibrillation) were collected. The study was divided into three periods using AH months as follows: baseline (months 1-4), pre-Ramadan (months 5-8) and Ramadan (months 9-12). Poisson regression was performed to explore the association between the time periods and rates of ischaemic stroke.
Results: Smoking was more common in Muslims than non-Muslims, with a higher incidence of 10.7 per 100,000 vs. 4.9 per 100,000 (P = 0.016). In relation to the three time periods, the incidence of ischaemic stroke was higher among Muslims than non-Muslims during Ramadan (13.5 vs. 5.4, P = 0.032), but not during the other time periods. For Muslims, the incidence rate ratio was higher during Ramadan (1.07; P = 0.049) than at baseline and pre-Ramadan (1.00 and 0.97, respectively; P = 0.576), whereas the ratios remained unchanged in the non-Muslim group.
Conclusion: There was a higher incidence of ischaemic stroke exclusively among Muslims during the Ramadan.
缺血性脑卒中是一种主要的健康负担。这项观察性研究的目的是比较居住在泰国南部的穆斯林和非穆斯林之间缺血性中风的发病率。方法:招募Hijri年(AH) 1435-1439年间在Yala地区医院入院的经计算机断层扫描证实的非复发性缺血性卒中患者进行研究。收集了人口统计学、宗教和危险因素(高血压、糖尿病)、吸烟和房颤数据。研究按AH月份分为三个阶段:基线(1-4个月)、斋月前(5-8个月)和斋月(9-12个月)。用泊松回归来探讨时间和缺血性脑卒中发生率之间的关系。结果:穆斯林吸烟比非穆斯林更常见,10.7 / 10万比4.9 / 10万(P = 0.016)。在三个时间段中,穆斯林在斋月期间缺血性中风的发病率高于非穆斯林(13.5 vs. 5.4, P = 0.032),但在其他时间段则不然。对于穆斯林,斋月期间的发病率比(1.07,P = 0.049)高于基线和斋月前(分别为1.00和0.97,P = 0.576),而非穆斯林组的发病率比保持不变。结论:穆斯林在斋月期间有较高的缺血性中风发生率。
{"title":"Rise of ischaemic stroke incidence among Muslims during the Ramadan period: a 5-year observational study.","authors":"Safari Binlee, Thammasin Ingviya, Rattana Leelawattana","doi":"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2024-095","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2024-095","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ischaemic stroke is a major health burden. The aim of this observational study was to compare the incidence of ischaemic stroke between Muslims and non-Muslims living in southern Thailand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with nonrecurrent computed tomography-proven ischaemic stroke admitted to Yala Regional Hospital during the Hijri years (AH) 1435-1439 were recruited for the study. Demographic, religious and risk factor data (hypertension, diabetes mellitus), smoking and atrial fibrillation) were collected. The study was divided into three periods using AH months as follows: baseline (months 1-4), pre-Ramadan (months 5-8) and Ramadan (months 9-12). Poisson regression was performed to explore the association between the time periods and rates of ischaemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Smoking was more common in Muslims than non-Muslims, with a higher incidence of 10.7 per 100,000 vs. 4.9 per 100,000 (P = 0.016). In relation to the three time periods, the incidence of ischaemic stroke was higher among Muslims than non-Muslims during Ramadan (13.5 vs. 5.4, P = 0.032), but not during the other time periods. For Muslims, the incidence rate ratio was higher during Ramadan (1.07; P = 0.049) than at baseline and pre-Ramadan (1.00 and 0.97, respectively; P = 0.576), whereas the ratios remained unchanged in the non-Muslim group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a higher incidence of ischaemic stroke exclusively among Muslims during the Ramadan.</p>","PeriodicalId":94289,"journal":{"name":"Singapore medical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144984803","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-27DOI: 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2025-017
Zhen Zhong Darren Teo, Hui Hiong Chen, Matthew Chung Yi Koh, Jinghao Nicholas Ngiam, Nares Smitasin, Jyoti Somani
{"title":"Increased role of oral antibiotics in the management of deep-seated infections.","authors":"Zhen Zhong Darren Teo, Hui Hiong Chen, Matthew Chung Yi Koh, Jinghao Nicholas Ngiam, Nares Smitasin, Jyoti Somani","doi":"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2025-017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2025-017","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94289,"journal":{"name":"Singapore medical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144984772","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-27DOI: 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2024-175
Jin Hean Koh, Claire Yi Jia Lim, Lucas Tze Peng Tan, Pervinder Bhogal, Ching Hui Sia, Tommy Andersson, Benjamin Yong Qiang Tan, Leonard Leong Litt Yeo
Abstract: Patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions face a high risk of recurrent ischaemic stroke despite best medical therapy. Previous trials of extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass surgery showed no benefit for stroke prevention in this population, but they may have been underpowered. This study evaluates the efficacy of EC-IC bypass surgery in reducing the risk of the composite outcome of stroke or death within 30 days or ipsilateral ischaemic stroke beyond 30 days through 2 years. Following a PROSPERO-registered protocol (CRD42023457824), we conducted a systematic review of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library for randomised trials, comparing the use of EC-IC bypass surgery plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke or death within 30 days or ipsilateral ischaemic stroke beyond 30 days through 2 years after randomisation. One-stage and two-stage meta-analyses using reconstructed individual patient data in hazard ratios (HRs) were performed. Four trials (2102 participants) were included. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in the one-stage (HR 1.019, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.860-1.209, P = 0.06) and two-stage (HR 0.954, 95% CI 0.841-1.241, P = 0.21) meta-analyses. Rates of ipsilateral ischaemic stroke, any stroke or death, and any stroke were also similar between groups at 2 years. In symptomatic ICA or MCA occlusion, adding bypass surgery to medical therapy does not significantly lower the risk of the composite outcome of stroke or death compared to medical therapy alone.
摘要:症状性动脉粥样硬化性颈内动脉(ICA)或大脑中动脉(MCA)闭塞的患者,尽管接受了最好的药物治疗,但仍面临着复发性缺血性卒中的高风险。先前的颅外-颅内(EC-IC)搭桥手术的试验显示,在这一人群中没有预防中风的效果,但它们可能是动力不足的。本研究评估了EC-IC搭桥手术在降低30天内卒中或死亡或30天以上同侧缺血性卒中复合结局的风险方面的疗效。根据prospero注册方案(CRD42023457824),我们对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆的随机试验进行了系统评价,比较了EC-IC搭桥手术加药物治疗与单独药物治疗的应用。主要结局是随机分组后2年内30天内卒中或死亡或30天以上同侧缺血性卒中的综合结果。利用重建的个体患者风险比(hr)数据进行一阶段和两阶段荟萃分析。纳入4项试验(2102名受试者)。两组一期meta分析(HR 1.019, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.860-1.209, P = 0.06)和两期meta分析(HR 0.954, 95% CI 0.841-1.241, P = 0.21)差异无统计学意义。同侧缺血性中风、任何中风或死亡以及任何中风的发生率在两组之间也相似。在有症状的ICA或MCA闭塞中,与单独药物治疗相比,在药物治疗的基础上增加搭桥手术并没有显著降低卒中或死亡的综合结果的风险。
{"title":"Extracranial-intracranial bypass for symptomatic intracranial arterial occlusion: a meta-analysis of individual patient data.","authors":"Jin Hean Koh, Claire Yi Jia Lim, Lucas Tze Peng Tan, Pervinder Bhogal, Ching Hui Sia, Tommy Andersson, Benjamin Yong Qiang Tan, Leonard Leong Litt Yeo","doi":"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2024-175","DOIUrl":"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2024-175","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions face a high risk of recurrent ischaemic stroke despite best medical therapy. Previous trials of extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass surgery showed no benefit for stroke prevention in this population, but they may have been underpowered. This study evaluates the efficacy of EC-IC bypass surgery in reducing the risk of the composite outcome of stroke or death within 30 days or ipsilateral ischaemic stroke beyond 30 days through 2 years. Following a PROSPERO-registered protocol (CRD42023457824), we conducted a systematic review of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library for randomised trials, comparing the use of EC-IC bypass surgery plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke or death within 30 days or ipsilateral ischaemic stroke beyond 30 days through 2 years after randomisation. One-stage and two-stage meta-analyses using reconstructed individual patient data in hazard ratios (HRs) were performed. Four trials (2102 participants) were included. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in the one-stage (HR 1.019, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.860-1.209, P = 0.06) and two-stage (HR 0.954, 95% CI 0.841-1.241, P = 0.21) meta-analyses. Rates of ipsilateral ischaemic stroke, any stroke or death, and any stroke were also similar between groups at 2 years. In symptomatic ICA or MCA occlusion, adding bypass surgery to medical therapy does not significantly lower the risk of the composite outcome of stroke or death compared to medical therapy alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":94289,"journal":{"name":"Singapore medical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144984779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-13DOI: 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2021-415
Jian Yi Soh, Fang Ni Ting, Miny Samuel
Introduction: Febrile infants often undergo septic workups, with urinary tract infection (UTI) being the most common serious bacterial infection. However, lumbar puncture practices vary, and the rate of concurrent meningitis remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the rate of concomitant bacterial meningitis in febrile infants with UTI.
Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and conference proceedings from inception to August 2023 were searched. Included studies involved febrile infants ≤90 days old with UTI and no clear infection source, where ≥10 infants underwent lumbar puncture. Studies with localising symptoms of another diagnosis or premature infants were excluded. Studies were independently reviewed and data were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models with heterogeneity tests. Study quality was assessed via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
Results: Thirty-nine observational studies met the eligibility criteria. The prevalence of concomitant definite bacterial meningitis in febrile infants with UTI was 0.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1%-0.4%). Between-studies comparison suggested this rate may be higher in neonates (≤28 days) than older infants (29-90 days old) (pooled estimate 0.7%, 95% CI 0.3%-1.1% vs. 0.2%, 0.0%-0.3%), while within-studies comparison showed no risk difference between the two groups. No association between bacterial meningitis and bacteraemia in infants with febrile UTI was observed.
Conclusion: In clinically well febrile infants without symptoms or signs suggesting meningitis, a screening urine sample should be recommended instead of a routine full septic workup.
导读:发热婴儿经常接受脓毒症检查,尿路感染(UTI)是最常见的严重细菌感染。然而,腰椎穿刺方法各不相同,并发脑膜炎的发生率仍不确定。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在确定伴有尿路感染的发热婴儿并发细菌性脑膜炎的发生率。方法:检索MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库、护理与联合健康文献累积索引、从成立到2023年8月的会议论文集。纳入的研究包括发热婴儿≤90天的尿路感染,没有明确的感染来源,其中≥10名婴儿进行了腰椎穿刺。排除其他诊断或早产儿的局限性症状的研究。对研究进行了独立审查,并提取了数据。采用随机效应模型和异质性检验进行meta分析。研究质量通过纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。结果:39项观察性研究符合入选标准。伴有尿路感染的发热婴儿合并细菌性脑膜炎的患病率为0.3%(95%可信区间[CI] 0.1%-0.4%)。研究间比较显示,新生儿(≤28天)的发生率可能高于较大婴儿(29-90天)(合并估计0.7%,95% CI 0.3%-1.1% vs. 0.2%, 0.0%-0.3%),而研究内比较显示两组之间无风险差异。未观察到发热性尿路感染患儿细菌性脑膜炎和菌血症之间的关联。结论:在临床发热良好且无脑膜炎症状或体征的婴儿中,应推荐筛查尿样而不是常规的全面脓毒症检查。
{"title":"Concomitant bacterial meningitis and urinary tract infection in infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jian Yi Soh, Fang Ni Ting, Miny Samuel","doi":"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2021-415","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2021-415","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Febrile infants often undergo septic workups, with urinary tract infection (UTI) being the most common serious bacterial infection. However, lumbar puncture practices vary, and the rate of concurrent meningitis remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the rate of concomitant bacterial meningitis in febrile infants with UTI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and conference proceedings from inception to August 2023 were searched. Included studies involved febrile infants ≤90 days old with UTI and no clear infection source, where ≥10 infants underwent lumbar puncture. Studies with localising symptoms of another diagnosis or premature infants were excluded. Studies were independently reviewed and data were extracted. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models with heterogeneity tests. Study quality was assessed via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine observational studies met the eligibility criteria. The prevalence of concomitant definite bacterial meningitis in febrile infants with UTI was 0.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1%-0.4%). Between-studies comparison suggested this rate may be higher in neonates (≤28 days) than older infants (29-90 days old) (pooled estimate 0.7%, 95% CI 0.3%-1.1% vs. 0.2%, 0.0%-0.3%), while within-studies comparison showed no risk difference between the two groups. No association between bacterial meningitis and bacteraemia in infants with febrile UTI was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In clinically well febrile infants without symptoms or signs suggesting meningitis, a screening urine sample should be recommended instead of a routine full septic workup.</p>","PeriodicalId":94289,"journal":{"name":"Singapore medical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144850191","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-08-13DOI: 10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2025-023
Darius Lim Xiang Wen, Thirumoorthy Thamotharampillai
{"title":"Clinical practice guidelines and the legal standard of care in disciplinary tribunals and negligence.","authors":"Darius Lim Xiang Wen, Thirumoorthy Thamotharampillai","doi":"10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2025-023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.SMJ-2025-023","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94289,"journal":{"name":"Singapore medical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144850190","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}