Cardiology and Therapy最新文献

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) often coexist due to the common elements of the pathomechanism they share. The potential significance of the order these entities present in the same patient is ill-defined. Herein, we report our results from a nationwide database on the occurrence of various sequences AF and HF may present, the time delays between the two conditions and all-cause mortality associated with different scenarios.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with both AF and HF between 2015 and 2021 were enrolled from the Hungarian National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) database. The order the two entities followed each other, and the time delay in between were registered. Median survival rates were calculated in AF → HF; HF → AF and simultaneous scenarios.

Results: A total of 109,075 patients were enrolled: 29,937 with AF → HF, 38,171 with HF → AF, and 40,967 diagnosed simultaneously. Time delays between AF → HF and HF → AF were 6 and 10 months, respectively. The median survival was 46 months in the AF → HF, 38 months in the HF → AF, and 21 months in the simultaneous group. Patients with HF → AF, and with simultaneous presentations had 5% and 16% greater mortality risk as compared to the AF → HF sequence, with hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 0.95 (0.93-0.97) and 0.84 (0.82-0.85), respectively (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: HF occurred significantly earlier after the diagnosis of AF than vice versa. Patients diagnosed simultaneously had the worst, while the AF → HF sequence had the best prognosis. These data should have implications for the intensification of monitoring and therapy in different scenarios.

Introduction: We previously conducted a prospective, observational post-marketing surveillance study to assess the safety and effectiveness of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) for rapid vitamin K antagonist (VKA) reversal in Japanese patients.

Methods: This subgroup analysis compared the safety, especially thromboembolic events (TEEs), and effectiveness of 4F-PCC by stratifying patients into two subgroups according to baseline international normalized ratio (INR) levels with < 2.0 and ≥ 2.0.

Results: Of 1271 eligible patients, 215 (17.9%) had INR < 2.0 and 987 (82.1%) had INR ≥ 2.0. Overall baseline characteristics were similar between groups; age (74.0 years vs 74.0 years), body mass index (22.1 kg/m² vs 21.9 kg/m²), ratio of inpatients (90.2% vs 88.7%), manifested atrial fibrillation (46.0% vs 48.8%). Median INRs at baseline were 1.72 (minimum 0.92, maximum 1.99) in the INR < 2.0 group and 2.95 (2.00, 27.11) in the INR ≥ 2.0 group. The most common reason for 4F-PCC administration was intracranial hemorrhage (67.0% vs 59.5%), and lesser gastrointestinal bleeding (0.9% vs 7.5%). After 4F-PCC administration (average doses 24.5 IU/kg [INR < 2.0 group] and 29.2 IU/kg [INR ≥ 2.0 group]), INRs were significantly reduced to 1.21 (- 28%) and 1.31 (- 68%), respectively, and resulted in hemostasis in a similarly rapid manner. The incidences of adverse drug reactions were 3.7% in each group. TEEs occurred in 4 (1.9%) patients in the INR < 2.0 group and 11 (1.1%) patients in the INR ≥ 2.0 group and were predominantly composed of stroke, while similar rates (67.0% vs 62.9%) of bleeding events post-anticoagulant resumption were observed between groups.

Conclusion: This study supports the favorable tolerability and efficacy of 4F-PCC regardless of baseline INR (< 2.0 or ≥ 2.0), with a prompt reduction of INR and substantial hemostatic effectiveness in the real-world setting for patients requiring urgent VKA reversal, although no indicated 4F-PCC dose for VKA reversal exists for INR < 2.0 to date.

This article is co-authored by a patient with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who is receiving long-term antiplatelet therapy in the USA and a cardiologist who routinely treats patients with ACS. The patient describes his experience from diagnosis to the present day and discusses his concerns regarding treatment and management of the condition, including the balance between the benefits and risks of antiplatelet therapy. The patient also describes his work as an advocate for cardiac health. The physician perspective on treating and managing patients with ACS is provided by a cardiologist based in the USA who is and was not involved in this patient's care. The physician reviews the benefits and risks of antiplatelet therapies for the treatment of patients with ACS and discusses his own clinical experience of managing these patients, including how issues such as treatment adherence, as well as the potential inertia to prescribing certain medications that may be seen among physicians, could be overcome.

Introduction: This prospective, single-arm, crossover pharmacodynamic study assessed the effect of Bayer^® low-dose enteric-coated aspirin 81 mg tablets (LD EC-ASA) (Bayer AG, Leverkusen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany) compared to Vazalore^® low-dose phospholipid-aspirin liquid-filled 81 mg capsules (LD PL-ASA) (PLx Pharma Inc., Sparta, NJ, USA) on platelet reactivity with respect to aspirin reaction units (ARU).

Methods: Forty-seven healthy volunteers were recruited. Platelet function was evaluated with the VerifyNow™ ARU assay (Werfen, Bedford, MA, USA) and assessed post-initiation of Bayer^® LD EC-ASA daily for 14 days, with a washout period of 28 days, followed by Vazalore^® LD PL-ASA daily for 14 days, again followed by ARU testing.

Results: Participants on LD EC-ASA had a mean ARU score of 426, with 19.1% of participants having an ARU > 550; patients on LD PL-ASA derived a mean ARU score of 435, with 14.9% achieving an ARU > 550. There were no significant differences in aspirin resistance (ARU > 550) according to the formulation (Bayer^® LD EC-ASA vs. Vazalore^® LD PL-ASA) used. Aspirin resistance was independent of ethnicity regardless of the formulation used. In addition, there were no significant associations between body surface area (BSA) and Bayer^® LD EC-ASA ARU value (p value 0.788) or Vazalore^® LD PL-ASA ARU value (p value 0.477). No patients experienced any serious adverse events or treatment-emergent adverse events.

Conclusions: There were no significant differences in aspirin resistance between Bayer^® LD EC-ASA and Vazalore^® LD PL-ASA. This dedicated pharmacodynamic study could potentially be informative and applicable for Trinidadian patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Further studies are required to confirm these exploratory findings.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT06228820, prospectively registered 1/18/2024.

The management of perioperative acute myocardial infarction (AMI) following oncologic neurosurgery requires balancing competing risks of myocardial ischemia and postoperative bleeding. There are limited human data to establish the safest timing of antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy following neurosurgical procedures. For patients with malignancy experiencing AMI in the acute postoperative period, staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with upfront coronary aspiration thrombectomy followed by delayed completion PCI may offer an opportunity for myocardial salvage while minimizing postoperative bleeding risks. CYP2C19 genotyping and platelet aggregation studies can help confirm adequate platelet inhibition once antiplatelet therapy is resumed.

Introduction: Ivabradine reduces heart rate (HR), episodes of angina, and nitrate consumption, and increases exercise capacity in patients with chronic angina (CA). In this exploratory study, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) was used to evaluate changes in the percentage of myocardial ischemia after ivabradine therapy in patients with CA.

Methods: This prospective, open-label, single-arm study included patients with CA receiving maximum tolerated doses of beta blockers, who had a resting HR ≥ 70 bpm and had experienced ischemia according to MPS during an exercise test at baseline. Participants received ivabradine 5 mg twice daily (titrated according to HR) concomitant with beta blockers. A second MPS was performed after 3 months, without interruption of treatment with beta blockers or ivabradine. The primary outcome was change in the percentage of myocardial ischemia from baseline to 3 months. Time to ischemia during the exercise test, the proportion of patients presenting angina during the exercise test, and health status, assessed using the seven-item Seattle Angina Questionnaire-7 (SAQ-7), were also evaluated.

Results: Twenty patients (3 females) with a mean (± standard deviation [SD]) age of 62.2 ± 6.5 years were included in the study, of whom 55% had diabetes, 70% had previous myocardial revascularization, and 45% had previous myocardial infarction. The percentage of patients with myocardial ischemia significantly decreased from baseline to 3 months after initiation of treatment with ivabradine (- 2.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.3 to - 5.5; p = 0.031). Mean time to appearance of ischemia increased from 403 ± 176 s at baseline to 466 ± 136 s at 3 months after initiation of ivabradine (Δ62 s; 95% CI 18-106 s; p = 0.008), and the proportion of patients experiencing angina during the exercise test decreased from 40% at baseline to 5% also at 3 months (p = 0.016). Mean resting HR decreased from 76 ± 7 bpm at baseline to 55 ± 8 bpm at 3 months (p < 0.001). The mean SAQ-7 summary score improved from 69 ± 21 at baseline to 83 ± 12 at 3 months (p = 0.001). No serious adverse effects were reported.

Conclusion: Ivabradine added to beta blockers was associated with a reduction in detectable myocardial ischemia by MPS in patients with CA. Infographic available for this article.

Trial registration: The trial has been retrospectively registered with the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (REBEC) under the following number RBR-5fysqrh (date of registration: 30 November 2023).

Introduction: Transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) is a progressive, heterogeneous rare disease manifesting as ATTR polyneuropathy (ATTR-PN), ATTR cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), or a mixed phenotype. Tafamidis meglumine (20 mg po qd) is approved in some markets to delay neurologic progression in ATTR-PN, while high-dose tafamidis (80/61 mg po qd) is approved worldwide to reduce cardiovascular mortality and cardiovascular-related hospitalization in ATTR-CM. The objective of this study was to assess the real-world benefit of high-dose tafamidis for delaying neurologic progression in patients with mixed-phenotype variant ATTR-CM (ATTRv-CM).

Methods: This exploratory, retrospective, observational cohort study evaluated anonymized electronic medical records and included adult patients with mixed-phenotype ATTRv-CM treated with high-dose tafamidis for at least 6 months. Neurologic assessments included the Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale for Muscle Strength, Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) muscle weakness subscale, and Polyneuropathy Disability (PND) instrument. Modified body mass index (mBMI) was also assessed.

Results: Patients (N = 10) started tafamidis treatment an average of 3.8 months after diagnosis, with an average treatment duration of 20.8 months. Seven of 10 patients demonstrated normal muscle strength on the MRC scale throughout the study, and 9 of 10 patients had no decline in muscle strength during the post-treatment period. The NIS muscle weakness subscale score was ≤ 60 for all patients in the study at all time points, suggesting normal function to mild impairment. Six of 10 patients had no change in walking capacity as measured by the PND instrument at pre- and post-assessments, while one-third of patients had a decrease in PND stage (signaling improvement) from pre- to post-assessment. mBMI remained relatively stable throughout the study.

Conclusion: This is the first real-world study to demonstrate the potential value of high-dose tafamidis for delaying neurologic disease progression in patients with mixed-phenotype ATTRv-CM. The findings underscore the importance of multidisciplinary assessment for patients with ATTR amyloidosis.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05139680.

Introduction: Data on real-world clinical practice and outcomes of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with connective tissue disease (CTD-PAH) are scarce. The OPUS/OrPHeUS studies enrolled patients newly initiating macitentan, including those with CTD-PAH. This analysis describes patient characteristics, treatment patterns, outcomes, and safety profiles of patients with CTD-PAH newly initiating macitentan in the US using the OPUS/OrPHeUS combined dataset.

Methods: OPUS was a prospective, US, multicenter, long-term, observational drug registry (April 2014-June 2020). OrPHeUS was a retrospective, US, multicenter medical chart review (October 2013-March 2017). The characteristics, treatment patterns, safety, and outcomes during macitentan treatment of patients with CTD-PAH and its subgroups systemic sclerosis (SSc-PAH), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE-PAH), and mixed CTD (MCTD-PAH) were descriptively compared to patients with idiopathic/heritable PAH (I/HPAH).

Results: The combined OPUS/OrPHeUS population included 2498 patients with I/HPAH and 1192 patients with CTD-PAH (708 SSc-PAH; 159 SLE-PAH; 124 MCTD-PAH, and 201 other CTD-PAH etiologies). At macitentan initiation for patients with I/HPAH and CTD-PAH, respectively: 61.2 and 69.3% were in World Health Organization functional class (WHO FC) III/IV; median 6-min walk distance was 289 and 279 m; and 58.1 and 65.2% received macitentan as combination therapy. During follow-up, for patients with I/HPAH and CTD-PAH, respectively: median duration of macitentan exposure observed was 14.0 and 15.8 months; 79.0 and 83.0% experienced an adverse event; Kaplan-Meier estimates (95% confidence limits [CL]) of patients free from all-cause hospitalization at 1 year were 60.3% (58.1, 62.4) and 59.3% (56.1, 62.3); and Kaplan-Meier estimates (95% CL) of survival at 1 year were 90.5% (89.1, 91.7) and 90.6% (88.6, 92.3).

Conclusions: Macitentan was used in clinical practice in patients with CTD-PAH and its subgroups, including as combination therapy. The safety and tolerability profile of macitentan in patients with CTD-PAH was comparable to that of patients with I/HPAH.

Trial registration: OPsumit® Users Registry (OPUS): NCT02126943; Opsumit® Historical Users cohort (OrPHeUS): NCT03197688; www.

Clinicaltrials: gov Graphical abstract available for this article.

Echocardiography frequently serves as the first-line treatment of diagnostic imaging for several pathological entities in cardiology. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been growing substantially in information technology and various commercial industries. Machine learning (ML), a branch of AI, has been shown to expand the capabilities and potential of echocardiography. ML algorithms expand the field of echocardiography by automated assessment of the ejection fraction and left ventricular function, integrating novel approaches such as speckle tracking or tissue Doppler echocardiography or vector flow mapping, improved phenotyping, distinguishing between cardiac conditions, and incorporating information from mobile health and genomics. In this review article, we assess the impact of AI and ML in echocardiography.

Introduction: Worldwide, arterial hypertension is the foremost preventable and modifiable cardiovascular risk factor. In addition to lifestyle changes, recent international guidelines recommend single-pill, low-dose combinations as initial treatment strategy. We investigated whether this approach is feasible in a rural sub-Saharan Africa setting.

Methods: Diagnosis of hypertension was established over three sets of blood pressure measurements, performed according to the European Society of Hypertension recommendations by trained personnel, using a validated, automated, oscillometric device OMRON M7 IT-HEM-7322-E. In 98 individuals with arterial hypertension, a once-daily, single-pill combination of olmesartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide was prescribed at an appropriate dose. Patients were instructed on its administration and potential side effects and encouraged towards lifestyle modifications. The treatment regimen was adjusted, if needed, at each outpatient clinic scheduled after 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks.

Results: Seventy-nine patients (aged 61 [53-70] years; median and interquartile range) strictly adhered to the treatment schedule, while 19 individuals (70 [65-80] years) dropped out. Blood pressure was < 140/90 mmHg after 4 weeks in 44 (56%), after 8 weeks in 62 (78%), after 12 weeks in 69 (87%), and after 16 weeks in 74 (94%) participants. Excellent tolerance was reported.

Conclusions: These results provide real-life evidence that hypertension management with a once-daily, single-pill combination of olmesartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide as initial treatment is feasible and effective also in a rural sub-Saharan setting. Single-pill combinations should be made available also in rural and remote areas in low- and middle-income countries as a reliable first-line treatment strategy.