Background: Postoperative cranial neurosurgical imaging practices are highly variable. We evaluated the rate and utility of early postoperative computed tomography (EPCT, defined as a CT head scan within 24h of surgery) in consecutive adult craniotomies. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive adult craniotomies at the University of Alberta Hospital over a 45-day period (17/09/2022 to 01/11/2022). Electronic medical records were reviewed to extract data on the rate, timing, and utility of EPCT as well as the rate of neurologic deterioration and repeat surgical intervention. Results: A total of 56 patients (27 female; 55.5 ± 2.1 yrs, range: 19-84 years) were identified. All patients underwent EPCT, including 10/56 (17.9%) on POD0 and 46/56 (82.1%) on POD1. Surgical complications (bleeding, extensive pneumocephalus, edema, ischemia) were identified in 8/56 (14.3%) of the EPCT, of which 6 (10.7%) were reported to have neurologic deterioration and 2 (3.6%) underwent further surgical intervention (hematoma evacuation). Clinical and radiological postoperative changes were highly related (p=5.16e-06), and the rate of EPCT being adverse without neurologic deficit, managed surgically, was 1/56 (1.8%). Conclusions: EPCT is routine practice. Given the low rate (1.8%) of repeat surgical intervention in the absence of neurologic deficit despite abnormal EPCT, omitting EPCT in neurologically intact patients may be warranted.
{"title":"P.108 Rate and clinical utility of early postoperative CT head in adult craniotomy","authors":"IE Harmsen, I. Fatokun, C. Elliott","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.211","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.211","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Postoperative cranial neurosurgical imaging practices are highly variable. We evaluated the rate and utility of early postoperative computed tomography (EPCT, defined as a CT head scan within 24h of surgery) in consecutive adult craniotomies. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive adult craniotomies at the University of Alberta Hospital over a 45-day period (17/09/2022 to 01/11/2022). Electronic medical records were reviewed to extract data on the rate, timing, and utility of EPCT as well as the rate of neurologic deterioration and repeat surgical intervention. Results: A total of 56 patients (27 female; 55.5 ± 2.1 yrs, range: 19-84 years) were identified. All patients underwent EPCT, including 10/56 (17.9%) on POD0 and 46/56 (82.1%) on POD1. Surgical complications (bleeding, extensive pneumocephalus, edema, ischemia) were identified in 8/56 (14.3%) of the EPCT, of which 6 (10.7%) were reported to have neurologic deterioration and 2 (3.6%) underwent further surgical intervention (hematoma evacuation). Clinical and radiological postoperative changes were highly related (p=5.16e-06), and the rate of EPCT being adverse without neurologic deficit, managed surgically, was 1/56 (1.8%). Conclusions: EPCT is routine practice. Given the low rate (1.8%) of repeat surgical intervention in the absence of neurologic deficit despite abnormal EPCT, omitting EPCT in neurologically intact patients may be warranted.","PeriodicalId":9571,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","volume":"13 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141098764","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
J. Zipfel, SR Kerscher, K. Dhillon, KP Ferraris, D. Feucht, A. Weir, MU Schuhmann, A. Singhal
Background: Pineal region tumors are a heterogenous group of pathologies often symptomatic due to occlusive hydrocephalus leading to elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). High ICP may not always be associated with clinical signs. A non-invasive technique for assessment of ICP is measuring the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). The goal of this study was to determine the utility of preoperative and postoperative ONSD measurements for assessment of elevated ICP in children with pineal region tumors. Methods: Retrospective data analysis was performed in patients operated for pineal region tumors at our tertiary care center between 2003 and 2022. Preoperative and postoperative MRI scans were reviewed. Clinical data and ONSD at multiple time points were analyzed and correlated. Results: Thirty-four patients with forty operative cases met the inclusion criteria. Hydrocephalus was seen in 80% of patients preoperatively (n=32/40). Presence of hydrocephalus was associated with significantly elevated ONSD preoperatively (p=0.006) and postoperatively (p=0.017). There was significant decrease in ONSD immediately postoperatively (p<0.001), at 3 months (p<0.001) and 12 months (p<0.001). In patients without hydrocephalus, no significant changes in ONSD were observed (p=0.369). Conclusions: ONSD is a useful adjunct for the identification of high ICP preoperatively and evaluation of treatment response postoperatively in patients presenting with pineal region tumors.
{"title":"P.106 Using optic nerve sheath diameter over ventricular size to assess elevated intracranial pressure in pediatric patients with pineal region tumors","authors":"J. Zipfel, SR Kerscher, K. Dhillon, KP Ferraris, D. Feucht, A. Weir, MU Schuhmann, A. Singhal","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.209","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.209","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pineal region tumors are a heterogenous group of pathologies often symptomatic due to occlusive hydrocephalus leading to elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). High ICP may not always be associated with clinical signs. A non-invasive technique for assessment of ICP is measuring the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD). The goal of this study was to determine the utility of preoperative and postoperative ONSD measurements for assessment of elevated ICP in children with pineal region tumors. Methods: Retrospective data analysis was performed in patients operated for pineal region tumors at our tertiary care center between 2003 and 2022. Preoperative and postoperative MRI scans were reviewed. Clinical data and ONSD at multiple time points were analyzed and correlated. Results: Thirty-four patients with forty operative cases met the inclusion criteria. Hydrocephalus was seen in 80% of patients preoperatively (n=32/40). Presence of hydrocephalus was associated with significantly elevated ONSD preoperatively (p=0.006) and postoperatively (p=0.017). There was significant decrease in ONSD immediately postoperatively (p<0.001), at 3 months (p<0.001) and 12 months (p<0.001). In patients without hydrocephalus, no significant changes in ONSD were observed (p=0.369). Conclusions: ONSD is a useful adjunct for the identification of high ICP preoperatively and evaluation of treatment response postoperatively in patients presenting with pineal region tumors.","PeriodicalId":9571,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","volume":"3 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141098936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Synthetic data has garnered heightened attention in contemporary research due to confidentiality barriers and its capacity to simulate variables challenging to obtain. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of synthetic data in the context of neuro-oncology research, comparing findings from two published studies with results from synthetic datasets. Methods: Two published neuro-oncology studies focusing on prognostic factors such as serum albumin and systemic inflammation scores were selected, and their methodologies were replicated using MDClone Platform to generate five synthetic datasets for each. We used Chi-Square test to assess inter-variability between synthetic datasets. Survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and t-test was used to determine statistical significance. Results: Findings from synthetic data consistently matched outcomes from both original articles, with serum albumin and systemc inflammation scores correlating with survival prognosis in glioblastoma and metastasis patients (p<0.05) Reported findings, demographic trends and survival outcomes showed significant similarity (P > 0.05) with synthetic datasets. Conclusions: Synthetic data consistently reproduced the statistical attributes of real patient data. Integrating synthetic data into clinical research offers excellent potential for providing accurate predictive insights without compromising patient privacy. In neuro-oncology, where patient follow-up pose challenges, the adoption of synthetic datasets can be transformative.
背景：合成数据因其保密性和模拟难以获得的变量的能力而在当代研究中备受关注。本研究旨在评估神经肿瘤学研究中合成数据的可靠性和有效性，将两项已发表的研究结果与合成数据集的结果进行比较。研究方法我们选取了两项已发表的神经肿瘤学研究，重点关注血清白蛋白和全身炎症评分等预后因素，并使用 MDClone 平台复制了它们的方法，为每项研究生成了五个合成数据集。我们使用 Chi-Square 检验来评估合成数据集之间的变异性。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 法评估生存结果，并使用 t 检验确定统计显著性。结果合成数据的结果与两篇原始文章的结果一致，血清白蛋白和系统炎症评分与胶质母细胞瘤和转移瘤患者合成数据集的生存预后相关（P 0.05）。结论：合成数据一致再现了真实患者数据的统计属性。将合成数据整合到临床研究中可在不损害患者隐私的情况下提供准确的预测见解。在神经肿瘤学领域，患者随访是一项挑战，采用合成数据集可以带来变革。
{"title":"P.091 Synthetic data reliably reproduces brain tumor primary research data","authors":"R. Khalaf, W. Davalan, A. Mohammad, RJ Diaz","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.196","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.196","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Synthetic data has garnered heightened attention in contemporary research due to confidentiality barriers and its capacity to simulate variables challenging to obtain. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of synthetic data in the context of neuro-oncology research, comparing findings from two published studies with results from synthetic datasets. Methods: Two published neuro-oncology studies focusing on prognostic factors such as serum albumin and systemic inflammation scores were selected, and their methodologies were replicated using MDClone Platform to generate five synthetic datasets for each. We used Chi-Square test to assess inter-variability between synthetic datasets. Survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and t-test was used to determine statistical significance. Results: Findings from synthetic data consistently matched outcomes from both original articles, with serum albumin and systemc inflammation scores correlating with survival prognosis in glioblastoma and metastasis patients (p<0.05) Reported findings, demographic trends and survival outcomes showed significant similarity (P > 0.05) with synthetic datasets. Conclusions: Synthetic data consistently reproduced the statistical attributes of real patient data. Integrating synthetic data into clinical research offers excellent potential for providing accurate predictive insights without compromising patient privacy. In neuro-oncology, where patient follow-up pose challenges, the adoption of synthetic datasets can be transformative.","PeriodicalId":9571,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","volume":"4 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141100785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
C Tsai, B. Tao, C Wang, AR Vosoughi, E. Bui, KM Chapman, SH Fox, F. Khosa
Background: Despite efforts to advance equity, women face gender-based barriers in research, including fewer senior authorship and grant opportunities. We examined gender disparities in Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) funding for Canadian neurology divisions and departments. Methods: Data on CIHR grant recipients and metrics (duration, quantity, and contribution) within Canadian neurology divisions and departments (2008-2022) were acquired from the CIHR Funding Decisions Database. Gender-based differences in grant prevalence, duration, and contribution amount within neurology were calculated with subgroup analysis for Canadian neurologists and Project Grant awards. Results: 1604 grants were awarded to Canadian neurology divisions and departments between 2008-2022. Women received fewer grants (41.46%), less funding (p<0.0001), and shorter grant durations (p<0.0001) than men annually. Women comprised the minority of recipients (45.47%) and were less likely to be awarded grants (p<0.001) annually relative to men. Differences were consistent in subgroup analyses, except grant durations were equal across genders in Project Grant awards. Conclusions: Gender disparities persist in CIHR grant funding to Canadian neurology divisions and departments. Women receive fewer grants, lower contribution amounts, and are less likely to be recipients compared to men. Future work includes addressing gender differences and continuing to evaluate CIHR funding to provide equitable opportunities for women.
{"title":"P.022 Gender disparity in canadian institutes of health research funding within neurology","authors":"C Tsai, B. Tao, C Wang, AR Vosoughi, E. Bui, KM Chapman, SH Fox, F. Khosa","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.129","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.129","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Despite efforts to advance equity, women face gender-based barriers in research, including fewer senior authorship and grant opportunities. We examined gender disparities in Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) funding for Canadian neurology divisions and departments. Methods: Data on CIHR grant recipients and metrics (duration, quantity, and contribution) within Canadian neurology divisions and departments (2008-2022) were acquired from the CIHR Funding Decisions Database. Gender-based differences in grant prevalence, duration, and contribution amount within neurology were calculated with subgroup analysis for Canadian neurologists and Project Grant awards. Results: 1604 grants were awarded to Canadian neurology divisions and departments between 2008-2022. Women received fewer grants (41.46%), less funding (p<0.0001), and shorter grant durations (p<0.0001) than men annually. Women comprised the minority of recipients (45.47%) and were less likely to be awarded grants (p<0.001) annually relative to men. Differences were consistent in subgroup analyses, except grant durations were equal across genders in Project Grant awards. Conclusions: Gender disparities persist in CIHR grant funding to Canadian neurology divisions and departments. Women receive fewer grants, lower contribution amounts, and are less likely to be recipients compared to men. Future work includes addressing gender differences and continuing to evaluate CIHR funding to provide equitable opportunities for women.","PeriodicalId":9571,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","volume":"9 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141100136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Y. Iyengar, S. Ng, S Chan, N. Sultan, H. Thornton, T. Patel, K. Grindrod, K. Krysko, G. Moores, A. Pikula, E. Bui
Background: Shared decision-making (SDM) is a dynamic, patient-engaged approach to collaborative medical care. Limited SDM tools exist in pregnancy. We aimed to examine the need and usability of a novel SDM tool for pharmaco-therapeutic treatment of neurological conditions in pregnancy. Methods: This is an exploratory mixed-methods study. Non-pregnant women of any age were recruited using convenience, purposive sampling from an academic neurology clinic in Toronto. Participants reported the user friendliness of the SDM by completing the systems usability (SUS) questionnaire and participated in a focus group to further elaborate on their experience. Results: Eleven participants completed the survey 45% each between age 31-40, and 51-60. Median time spent on the tool was 17.2 minutes, and median SUS score 70 (<68 being not usable). Thematic data analysis from 2 focus groups, identified technical and content improvements: use of inclusive language, simplified design, and importance of patient engagement in SDM. Conclusions: Based on our preliminary results, a SDM web-tool for medication-related concerns of pregnant patients with neurological conditions is needed and usable. With integration of patients’ lived experiences, this novel tool may serve as an anchor point for future work in this field.
{"title":"P.019 A shared decision-model toolkit for pregnancy related care in neurology","authors":"Y. Iyengar, S. Ng, S Chan, N. Sultan, H. Thornton, T. Patel, K. Grindrod, K. Krysko, G. Moores, A. Pikula, E. Bui","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.126","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.126","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Shared decision-making (SDM) is a dynamic, patient-engaged approach to collaborative medical care. Limited SDM tools exist in pregnancy. We aimed to examine the need and usability of a novel SDM tool for pharmaco-therapeutic treatment of neurological conditions in pregnancy. Methods: This is an exploratory mixed-methods study. Non-pregnant women of any age were recruited using convenience, purposive sampling from an academic neurology clinic in Toronto. Participants reported the user friendliness of the SDM by completing the systems usability (SUS) questionnaire and participated in a focus group to further elaborate on their experience. Results: Eleven participants completed the survey 45% each between age 31-40, and 51-60. Median time spent on the tool was 17.2 minutes, and median SUS score 70 (<68 being not usable). Thematic data analysis from 2 focus groups, identified technical and content improvements: use of inclusive language, simplified design, and importance of patient engagement in SDM. Conclusions: Based on our preliminary results, a SDM web-tool for medication-related concerns of pregnant patients with neurological conditions is needed and usable. With integration of patients’ lived experiences, this novel tool may serve as an anchor point for future work in this field.","PeriodicalId":9571,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","volume":"7 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141100296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
AK Percy, JL Neul, TA Benke, EM Berry-Kravis, DG Glaze, ED Marsh, A. Lamontagne, D. An, KM Bishop, JM Youakim
Background: Trofinetide significantly improved core symptoms of Rett syndrome (RTT) with an acceptable safety profile in LAVENDER. Here, we report the safety and efficacy results of LILAC and LILAC-2, open-label extension studies of LAVENDER. Methods: Females with RTT, aged 5–21 years, received twice-daily, oral trofinetide in LILAC for 40 weeks. Participants who completed LAVENDER and LILAC continued trofinetide in LILAC-2, a 32-month extension study. Safety assessments included the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Efficacy endpoints included the Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire (RSBQ) and the Clinical Global Impression–Improvement (CGI-I) scale. Results: Overall, 154 patients were enrolled in LILAC. The most common AEs were diarrhea (74.7%) and vomiting (28.6%). The mean (standard error [SE]) change from the LAVENDER baseline to Week 40 in the LILAC study in RSBQ was -7.3 (1.62) and -7.0 (1.61) for participants treated with trofinetide and placebo in LAVENDER, respectively. Mean (SE) CGI-I scores compared with the LILAC baseline at Week 40 were 3.1 (0.11) and 3.2 (0.14) for patients treated with trofinetide and placebo in LAVENDER, respectively. Similar safety and efficacy trends were observed in LILAC-2. Conclusions: Trofinetide continued to improve symptoms of RTT in LILAC and LILAC-2 with a safety profile consistent with LAVENDER.
{"title":"P.045 Trofinetide for the treatment of Rett syndrome: long-term safety and efficacy results from the open-label LILAC and LILAC-2 studies","authors":"AK Percy, JL Neul, TA Benke, EM Berry-Kravis, DG Glaze, ED Marsh, A. Lamontagne, D. An, KM Bishop, JM Youakim","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.152","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.152","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Trofinetide significantly improved core symptoms of Rett syndrome (RTT) with an acceptable safety profile in LAVENDER. Here, we report the safety and efficacy results of LILAC and LILAC-2, open-label extension studies of LAVENDER. Methods: Females with RTT, aged 5–21 years, received twice-daily, oral trofinetide in LILAC for 40 weeks. Participants who completed LAVENDER and LILAC continued trofinetide in LILAC-2, a 32-month extension study. Safety assessments included the incidence of adverse events (AEs). Efficacy endpoints included the Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire (RSBQ) and the Clinical Global Impression–Improvement (CGI-I) scale. Results: Overall, 154 patients were enrolled in LILAC. The most common AEs were diarrhea (74.7%) and vomiting (28.6%). The mean (standard error [SE]) change from the LAVENDER baseline to Week 40 in the LILAC study in RSBQ was -7.3 (1.62) and -7.0 (1.61) for participants treated with trofinetide and placebo in LAVENDER, respectively. Mean (SE) CGI-I scores compared with the LILAC baseline at Week 40 were 3.1 (0.11) and 3.2 (0.14) for patients treated with trofinetide and placebo in LAVENDER, respectively. Similar safety and efficacy trends were observed in LILAC-2. Conclusions: Trofinetide continued to improve symptoms of RTT in LILAC and LILAC-2 with a safety profile consistent with LAVENDER.","PeriodicalId":9571,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","volume":"7 30","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141099028","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
MA MacLean, AJ Charles, M. Georgiopoulos, J. Phinney, R. Charest-Morin, C. Goodwin, MH Weber
Background: Frailty and sarcopenia predict worse surgical outcomes among spinal degenerative and deformity-related populations; this association is less clear in the context of spinal oncology. Here, we identified frailty and sarcopenia tools applied in spinal oncology and appraised their clinimetric properties. Methods: A systematic review was conducted from January 1st, 2000, until June 2022. Study characteristics, frailty tools, measures of sarcopenia, component domains, individual items, cut-off values, and measurement techniques were collected. Clinimetric assessment was performed according to Consensus-based Standards for Health Measurement Instruments. Results: Twenty-two studies were included (42,514 patients). The three most employed frailty tools were the Metastatic Spine tumor Frailty Index (MSTFI), Modified Frailty Index-11 (mFI-11), and the mFI-5. The three most common sarcopenia measures were the L3-Total Psoas Area (TPA)/Vertebral Body Area (VBA), L3-TPA/Height2, and L3-Spinal Muscle Index (L3-Cross-Sectional Muscle Area/Height2). Frailty and sarcopenia measures lacked content and construct validity. Positive predictive validity was observed in select studies employing the HFRS, mFI-5, MSTFI, and L3-TPA/VBA. All frailty tools had floor or ceiling effects. Conclusions: Existing tools for evaluating frailty and sarcopenia in surgical spine oncology have poor clinimetric properties. Here, we provide a pragmatic approach to utilizing existing frailty and sarcopenia tools, until more clinimetrically robust instruments are developed.
{"title":"P.151 A critical appraisal of the application of frailty and sarcopenia in the spinal oncology population","authors":"MA MacLean, AJ Charles, M. Georgiopoulos, J. Phinney, R. Charest-Morin, C. Goodwin, MH Weber","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.250","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.250","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Frailty and sarcopenia predict worse surgical outcomes among spinal degenerative and deformity-related populations; this association is less clear in the context of spinal oncology. Here, we identified frailty and sarcopenia tools applied in spinal oncology and appraised their clinimetric properties. Methods: A systematic review was conducted from January 1st, 2000, until June 2022. Study characteristics, frailty tools, measures of sarcopenia, component domains, individual items, cut-off values, and measurement techniques were collected. Clinimetric assessment was performed according to Consensus-based Standards for Health Measurement Instruments. Results: Twenty-two studies were included (42,514 patients). The three most employed frailty tools were the Metastatic Spine tumor Frailty Index (MSTFI), Modified Frailty Index-11 (mFI-11), and the mFI-5. The three most common sarcopenia measures were the L3-Total Psoas Area (TPA)/Vertebral Body Area (VBA), L3-TPA/Height2, and L3-Spinal Muscle Index (L3-Cross-Sectional Muscle Area/Height2). Frailty and sarcopenia measures lacked content and construct validity. Positive predictive validity was observed in select studies employing the HFRS, mFI-5, MSTFI, and L3-TPA/VBA. All frailty tools had floor or ceiling effects. Conclusions: Existing tools for evaluating frailty and sarcopenia in surgical spine oncology have poor clinimetric properties. Here, we provide a pragmatic approach to utilizing existing frailty and sarcopenia tools, until more clinimetrically robust instruments are developed.","PeriodicalId":9571,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141098978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
R. Wang, A. Parrent, D. Steven, J. Burneo, A. Suller-Martí, JC Lau
Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally-invasive procedure that has been used to treat temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), however its long-term efficacy is unknown. We aim to characterize the long-term outcomes of patients from the original series by Parrent and Blume (1999). Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent stereotactic RFA for TLE were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, procedural details, and seizure outcomes until last follow-up were abstracted. Seizure-freedom after initial RFA treatment was estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: 27 patients underwent RFA from 1994 to 2002. There were 14 female (52%) patients. 24 (89%) had mesial temporal sclerosis. Mean age at time of RFA was 33.1 years (range 12-45 years). 17 (63%) patients underwent left-sided RFA. 15 (56%) patients had further interventions: 4 (15%) underwent only repeat RFA, 1 (4%) had repeat RFA and anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL), and 10 (37%) underwent subsequent ATL only. Mean follow-up was 9.0 years (range 0.5-22.7 years). At last follow-up, 16 (59%) patients were seizure-free: 5 (19%) received one RFA treatment and 11 (41%) underwent additional procedures. Conclusions: Based on the original series describing the technique, stereotactic RFA for TLE is a safe, minimally-invasive procedure. The role of stereotactic RFA in the treatment of TLE remains to be determined.
{"title":"P.076 Long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for temporal lobe epilepsy","authors":"R. Wang, A. Parrent, D. Steven, J. Burneo, A. Suller-Martí, JC Lau","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.182","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally-invasive procedure that has been used to treat temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), however its long-term efficacy is unknown. We aim to characterize the long-term outcomes of patients from the original series by Parrent and Blume (1999). Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent stereotactic RFA for TLE were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, procedural details, and seizure outcomes until last follow-up were abstracted. Seizure-freedom after initial RFA treatment was estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: 27 patients underwent RFA from 1994 to 2002. There were 14 female (52%) patients. 24 (89%) had mesial temporal sclerosis. Mean age at time of RFA was 33.1 years (range 12-45 years). 17 (63%) patients underwent left-sided RFA. 15 (56%) patients had further interventions: 4 (15%) underwent only repeat RFA, 1 (4%) had repeat RFA and anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL), and 10 (37%) underwent subsequent ATL only. Mean follow-up was 9.0 years (range 0.5-22.7 years). At last follow-up, 16 (59%) patients were seizure-free: 5 (19%) received one RFA treatment and 11 (41%) underwent additional procedures. Conclusions: Based on the original series describing the technique, stereotactic RFA for TLE is a safe, minimally-invasive procedure. The role of stereotactic RFA in the treatment of TLE remains to be determined.","PeriodicalId":9571,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","volume":"92 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141101152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
S. Fam, L. Przybyl, T. Azad, Jn Stankowski, K. Moy, D. Rotstein
Background: The complement component 5 inhibitor therapies (C5ITs) eculizumab and ravulizumab have been approved or submitted for regulatory approval in several regions for AQP4+ NMOSD. Methods: This global, long-term, prospective, multicenter, observational registry will enroll adult patients with AQP4+ NMOSD being treated with eculizumab or ravulizumab and who have received ≥1 dose of eculizumab or ravulizumab within 4 or 12 weeks prior to enrollment, respectively. Inclusion criteria include available historical data on C5IT dosing since initiation and the number and types of relapses from 1 year prior to C5IT initiation through enrollment. The primary outcome is annualized relapse rate. Safety outcomes will include serious adverse events, meningococcal infections, and pregnancy, breastfeeding, and neonatal outcomes. Data will be collected prospectively for up to 5 years. Approximately 130 patients will be enrolled, with a maximum of around 200 patients in up to 10 countries globally. Results: N/A Conclusions: This registry will collect data to characterize the long-term effectiveness and safety of the C5ITs eculizumab and ravulizumab in patients with AQP4+ NMOSD to provide evidence on the real-world impact of C5ITs in this patient population.
{"title":"P.012 A global, long-term, prospective, observational registry of patients with AQP4+ NMOSD treated with complement component 5 inhibitor therapies eculizumab or ravulizumab","authors":"S. Fam, L. Przybyl, T. Azad, Jn Stankowski, K. Moy, D. Rotstein","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.120","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.120","url":null,"abstract":"Background: The complement component 5 inhibitor therapies (C5ITs) eculizumab and ravulizumab have been approved or submitted for regulatory approval in several regions for AQP4+ NMOSD. Methods: This global, long-term, prospective, multicenter, observational registry will enroll adult patients with AQP4+ NMOSD being treated with eculizumab or ravulizumab and who have received ≥1 dose of eculizumab or ravulizumab within 4 or 12 weeks prior to enrollment, respectively. Inclusion criteria include available historical data on C5IT dosing since initiation and the number and types of relapses from 1 year prior to C5IT initiation through enrollment. The primary outcome is annualized relapse rate. Safety outcomes will include serious adverse events, meningococcal infections, and pregnancy, breastfeeding, and neonatal outcomes. Data will be collected prospectively for up to 5 years. Approximately 130 patients will be enrolled, with a maximum of around 200 patients in up to 10 countries globally. Results: N/A Conclusions: This registry will collect data to characterize the long-term effectiveness and safety of the C5ITs eculizumab and ravulizumab in patients with AQP4+ NMOSD to provide evidence on the real-world impact of C5ITs in this patient population.","PeriodicalId":9571,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","volume":"2 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141101336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: This retrospective study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of sulthiame as a treatment in children with epilepsy. In Canada, sulthiame is only available through Health Canada’s Special Access Program. Methods: Patients who received sulthiame at the Montreal Children’s Hospital from April 2012 to March 2023 were included. Patients’ medical charts were reviewed, and clinical data was extracted from neurology clinic notes and electroencephalogram (EEG) reports. Efficacy was assessed by comparing seizure frequency and frequency of EEG epileptiform abnormalities before and after initiating sulthiame, while also noting any reported changes in cognition or behaviour. Results: Sixteen patients were included (10 males, 6 females), all of whom had drug-resistant epilepsy and continuous spike-wave in sleep (CSWS) on EEG. Sulthiame starting dose ranged from 0.74 to 6.75 mg/kg/day. Improvement, either in terms of seizure control, cognition, or reduction in EEG epileptiform abnormalities, was reported in 8/16 children (50%). Two patients (13%) became seizure free, while three more (19%) had reduced seizure frequency. Three other patients (19%) had reported improvements in concentration, learning abilities or behaviour. No serious adverse event was reported. Conclusions: These data indicate that sulthiame is effective and well-tolerated in children with CSWS, regardless of the etiology and type of epilepsy.
{"title":"C.3 Retrospective study of sulthiame in treatment of pediatric epilepsy","authors":"A. Laliberté, KA Myers","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2024.88","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cjn.2024.88","url":null,"abstract":"Background: This retrospective study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of sulthiame as a treatment in children with epilepsy. In Canada, sulthiame is only available through Health Canada’s Special Access Program. Methods: Patients who received sulthiame at the Montreal Children’s Hospital from April 2012 to March 2023 were included. Patients’ medical charts were reviewed, and clinical data was extracted from neurology clinic notes and electroencephalogram (EEG) reports. Efficacy was assessed by comparing seizure frequency and frequency of EEG epileptiform abnormalities before and after initiating sulthiame, while also noting any reported changes in cognition or behaviour. Results: Sixteen patients were included (10 males, 6 females), all of whom had drug-resistant epilepsy and continuous spike-wave in sleep (CSWS) on EEG. Sulthiame starting dose ranged from 0.74 to 6.75 mg/kg/day. Improvement, either in terms of seizure control, cognition, or reduction in EEG epileptiform abnormalities, was reported in 8/16 children (50%). Two patients (13%) became seizure free, while three more (19%) had reduced seizure frequency. Three other patients (19%) had reported improvements in concentration, learning abilities or behaviour. No serious adverse event was reported. Conclusions: These data indicate that sulthiame is effective and well-tolerated in children with CSWS, regardless of the etiology and type of epilepsy.","PeriodicalId":9571,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","volume":"80 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141101711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：