Pub Date : 2024-10-29DOI: 10.1080/09297049.2024.2422912
Claire M Champigny, Leila Kahnami, Tamiko Isaacs, Nataly Beribisky, Mary Desrocher, Samantha J Feldman, Pradeep Krishnan, Nomazulu Dlamini, Peter Dirks, Robyn Westmacott
Neurocognitive deficits commonly occur following intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in childhood, yet this population remains understudied. The current study is a preliminary exploration of neurocognitive outcomes in this population. At the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Canada, 17 patients (Mage = 14.2, SD = 4.6) with a history of childhood ICH completed a neuropsychological assessment evaluating perceptual reasoning, verbal reasoning, processing speed, working memory, verbal learning, verbal memory, visuomotor integration, selective attention, and executive functioning. Mean Full Scale IQ (FSIQ; M = 98.1, SD = 13.6) fell within the clinically average range compared to population norms, though it was skewed toward lower ranges. Furthermore, approximately 50-60% of the participants scored under the clinically average range on tests of verbal learning, verbal memory, processing speed, and visuomotor integration. Youth with childhood ICH may present with FSIQ within the average range, but as a group they skew toward lower ranges and are more likely to demonstrate deficits in distinct neurocognitive domains. Clinical evaluation of a wide range of neuropsychological skills is warranted. Clinical implications encompass informing of intake interviews, development of test batteries, and appraisal of prognosis. Findings contribute to the limited knowledge base about neurocognitive outcomes following childhood ICH.
儿童脑内出血(ICH)后通常会出现神经认知障碍,但对这一人群的研究仍然不足。本研究是对这一人群神经认知结果的初步探索。在加拿大多伦多病童医院(Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Canada),17 名有儿童 ICH 病史的患者(Mage = 14.2,SD = 4.6)完成了神经心理学评估,评估内容包括感知推理、言语推理、处理速度、工作记忆、言语学习、言语记忆、视觉运动整合、选择性注意和执行功能。平均全量表智商(FSIQ;中=98.1,标差=13.6)与人群标准相比,处于临床平均范围内,但偏向于较低范围。此外,约有 50-60% 的参与者在言语学习、言语记忆、处理速度和视觉运动整合测试中的得分低于临床平均水平。患有儿童 ICH 的青少年的 FSIQ 值可能在平均值范围内,但作为一个群体,他们的 FSIQ 值偏低,更有可能在不同的神经认知领域表现出缺陷。因此,有必要对各种神经心理技能进行临床评估。临床意义包括为入院面谈、开发测试组合和评估预后提供信息。这些研究结果为儿童 ICH 后神经认知结果的有限知识库做出了贡献。
{"title":"Neurocognitive outcomes following intracerebral hemorrhage in childhood.","authors":"Claire M Champigny, Leila Kahnami, Tamiko Isaacs, Nataly Beribisky, Mary Desrocher, Samantha J Feldman, Pradeep Krishnan, Nomazulu Dlamini, Peter Dirks, Robyn Westmacott","doi":"10.1080/09297049.2024.2422912","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2024.2422912","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neurocognitive deficits commonly occur following intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in childhood, yet this population remains understudied. The current study is a preliminary exploration of neurocognitive outcomes in this population. At the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Canada, 17 patients (<i>M<sub>age</sub></i> = 14.2, <i>SD</i> = 4.6) with a history of childhood ICH completed a neuropsychological assessment evaluating perceptual reasoning, verbal reasoning, processing speed, working memory, verbal learning, verbal memory, visuomotor integration, selective attention, and executive functioning. Mean Full Scale IQ (FSIQ; <i>M</i> = 98.1, <i>SD</i> = 13.6) fell within the clinically average range compared to population norms, though it was skewed toward lower ranges. Furthermore, approximately 50-60% of the participants scored under the clinically average range on tests of verbal learning, verbal memory, processing speed, and visuomotor integration. Youth with childhood ICH may present with FSIQ within the average range, but as a group they skew toward lower ranges and are more likely to demonstrate deficits in distinct neurocognitive domains. Clinical evaluation of a wide range of neuropsychological skills is warranted. Clinical implications encompass informing of intake interviews, development of test batteries, and appraisal of prognosis. Findings contribute to the limited knowledge base about neurocognitive outcomes following childhood ICH.</p>","PeriodicalId":9789,"journal":{"name":"Child Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142521148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-28DOI: 10.1080/09297049.2024.2421222
Ajla Bukva, Haris Memisevic
Mathematics, along with reading and writing, is a core academic subject in the school curriculum. The development of mathematical skills is influenced by various cognitive factors, with executive functions (EF) playing a central role. EF, which encompasses working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility, is critical for supporting complex cognitive processes required for problem-solving and mathematical reasoning. Research consistently shows that children with stronger EF tend to achieve better academic outcomes, including in mathematics. The goal of the present study was to examine the relationships between the global EF and its three core components - working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility - and their impact on mathematics achievement. The sample for this study consisted of 180 children, aged 8-11 years (mean age: 9.6, SD: 1.0 year; 83 girls, 97 boys). EF was assessed using the Yellow-Red test, while mathematics achievement was evaluated based on teachers' evaluations of the child's mathematics performance. The results indicated a statistically significant effect of global EF and its three components on mathematics achievement. Given the potential malleability of EFs, we conclude with recommendations for strategies to enhance EF development at an early school age.
{"title":"The relationship between executive functions and mathematics achievements in early-grade elementary students.","authors":"Ajla Bukva, Haris Memisevic","doi":"10.1080/09297049.2024.2421222","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2024.2421222","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mathematics, along with reading and writing, is a core academic subject in the school curriculum. The development of mathematical skills is influenced by various cognitive factors, with executive functions (EF) playing a central role. EF, which encompasses working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility, is critical for supporting complex cognitive processes required for problem-solving and mathematical reasoning. Research consistently shows that children with stronger EF tend to achieve better academic outcomes, including in mathematics. The goal of the present study was to examine the relationships between the global EF and its three core components - working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility - and their impact on mathematics achievement. The sample for this study consisted of 180 children, aged 8-11 years (mean age: 9.6, SD: 1.0 year; 83 girls, 97 boys). EF was assessed using the Yellow-Red test, while mathematics achievement was evaluated based on teachers' evaluations of the child's mathematics performance. The results indicated a statistically significant effect of global EF and its three components on mathematics achievement. Given the potential malleability of EFs, we conclude with recommendations for strategies to enhance EF development at an early school age.</p>","PeriodicalId":9789,"journal":{"name":"Child Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142495997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-25DOI: 10.1080/09297049.2024.2419048
Melanie Ehrler, Ruth O'Gorman, Flavia Maria Wehrle, Anna Speckert, Andras Jakab, Oliver Kretschmar, Beatrice Latal
Patients with complex congenital heart disease (cCHD) are at risk for neurodevelopmental impairments, yet many patients develop normally. This study investigated associations between a favorable neurodevelopmental profile and protective factors, quality of life (QoL), resilience, and brain development. Adolescents with cCHD (n = 100) were prospectively enrolled. Neurodevelopmental profiles comprised IQ, executive functions, and behavior. Standardized neuropsychological tests and questionnaires were used to assess neurodevelopmental outcomes, family factors, QoL, and resilience. Clinical data were obtained from medical charts. Cerebral MRI was acquired. Specific neurodevelopmental profiles were identified by latent profile analysis and were associated with clinical and family factors, QoL and resilience, and MRI markers. We identified two distinct groups of neurodevelopmental profiles (favorable profile: n = 57, vulnerable profile: n = 43). The favorable profile group had significantly better neurodevelopmental outcome, better family functioning, and better parental mental health compared to the vulnerable profile group. Clinical factors were not significantly associated with profile group. The favorable profile group reported significantly better QoL and resilience and had larger total brain volumes. A positive family environment may be protective for long-term neurodevelopment and may outweigh the role of clinical factors. This study underlines the importance of family-centered care to promote favorable brain development and neurodevelopmental outcome.
{"title":"Learning from those who thrive: protective factors and neuroimaging markers in adolescents with complex congenital heart disease and with a favorable neurodevelopmental profile.","authors":"Melanie Ehrler, Ruth O'Gorman, Flavia Maria Wehrle, Anna Speckert, Andras Jakab, Oliver Kretschmar, Beatrice Latal","doi":"10.1080/09297049.2024.2419048","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09297049.2024.2419048","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with complex congenital heart disease (cCHD) are at risk for neurodevelopmental impairments, yet many patients develop normally. This study investigated associations between a favorable neurodevelopmental profile and protective factors, quality of life (QoL), resilience, and brain development. Adolescents with cCHD (<i>n</i> = 100) were prospectively enrolled. Neurodevelopmental profiles comprised IQ, executive functions, and behavior. Standardized neuropsychological tests and questionnaires were used to assess neurodevelopmental outcomes, family factors, QoL, and resilience. Clinical data were obtained from medical charts. Cerebral MRI was acquired. Specific neurodevelopmental profiles were identified by latent profile analysis and were associated with clinical and family factors, QoL and resilience, and MRI markers. We identified two distinct groups of neurodevelopmental profiles (<i>favorable profile</i>: <i>n</i> = 57, <i>vulnerable profile</i>: <i>n</i> = 43). The <i>favorable profile</i> group had significantly better neurodevelopmental outcome, better family functioning, and better parental mental health compared to the <i>vulnerable profile</i> group. Clinical factors were not significantly associated with profile group. The <i>favorable profile</i> group reported significantly better QoL and resilience and had larger total brain volumes. A positive family environment may be protective for long-term neurodevelopment and may outweigh the role of clinical factors. This study underlines the importance of family-centered care to promote favorable brain development and neurodevelopmental outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":9789,"journal":{"name":"Child Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142495996","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The recommended rehabilitation procedures for Developmental Dyslexia (DD) are not well defined, and there is currently a large debate on which therapeutic approaches are shown to be more useful and effective. Among the trainings focused on general dysfunctional cognitive processes associated with a reading disorder, recent studies suggested the efficacy of trainings on Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) compared to others. The present study was aimed at confirming the effectiveness of RAN training (RANt) to improve the reading performances of children with DD (n = 32) compared to children on a waiting list (WL, n = 25) and to children in different treatment groups, one following a text reading training (RT, n = 26) and the other combining RAN and text reading exercises (RANt+RT, n = 20), through an online platform that allows intensive and self-adaptive activities. Results confirmed the efficacy of RANt in improving reading speed and accuracy compared to the WL group (r2 ranging from small (.16) to medium (.48)) and found the absence of differences with the other active control groups. The single-subject level analysis confirmed the results, a high inter-subject variability in treatment response and pre-post differences were found. Further studies could consider such variability in the functional profile of the DD subjects, but RANt was confirmed to be a valid tool for improving decoding skills.
{"title":"Training rapid automatized naming in children with developmental Dyslexia.","authors":"Daniela Graziani, Agnese Capodieci, Claudia Casalini, Susanna Giaccherini, Valentina Scali, Luciano Luccherino, Chiara Pecini","doi":"10.1080/09297049.2024.2414019","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09297049.2024.2414019","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The recommended rehabilitation procedures for Developmental Dyslexia (DD) are not well defined, and there is currently a large debate on which therapeutic approaches are shown to be more useful and effective. Among the trainings focused on general dysfunctional cognitive processes associated with a reading disorder, recent studies suggested the efficacy of trainings on Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) compared to others. The present study was aimed at confirming the effectiveness of RAN training (RANt) to improve the reading performances of children with DD (<i>n</i> = 32) compared to children on a waiting list (WL, <i>n</i> = 25) and to children in different treatment groups, one following a text reading training (RT, <i>n</i> = 26) and the other combining RAN and text reading exercises (RANt+RT, <i>n</i> = 20), through an online platform that allows intensive and self-adaptive activities. Results confirmed the efficacy of RANt in improving reading speed and accuracy compared to the WL group (r<sup>2</sup> ranging from small (.16) to medium (.48)) and found the absence of differences with the other active control groups. The single-subject level analysis confirmed the results, a high inter-subject variability in treatment response and pre-post differences were found. Further studies could consider such variability in the functional profile of the DD subjects, but RANt was confirmed to be a valid tool for improving decoding skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":9789,"journal":{"name":"Child Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142459137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-16DOI: 10.1080/09297049.2024.2414875
Ashley Owen, Sara Cruz, Marta Pozo-Rodriguez, Sabela Conde-Pumpido, María Tubío-Fungueiriño, Adriana Sampaio, Angel Carracedo, Montse Fernández-Prieto
The relationship between sensory processing, executive function, and behavior in children with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is far from clear. The aim of this study was to examine the mediating role of executive function in the relationship between sensory processing and behavior in ADHD. Sixty-three children (51 boys), aged between 7 and 14 years participated in this study. Caregivers completed the Sensory Profile 2 (SP-2), the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function 2 (BRIEF-2), and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) to assess sensory processing, executive function, and behavior, respectively. Positive and significant associations were found between sensory processing, executive function, and behavioral problems. In addition, positive indirect effects between sensory processing and behavior were mediated by executive function. These findings add to other evidence on neurodevelopmental disorders, suggesting that sensory processing may be a foundational aspect related to executive function, which in turn affects behavior in ADHD.
{"title":"Sensory processing, executive function, and behavior in children with ADHD.","authors":"Ashley Owen, Sara Cruz, Marta Pozo-Rodriguez, Sabela Conde-Pumpido, María Tubío-Fungueiriño, Adriana Sampaio, Angel Carracedo, Montse Fernández-Prieto","doi":"10.1080/09297049.2024.2414875","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2024.2414875","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The relationship between sensory processing, executive function, and behavior in children with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is far from clear. The aim of this study was to examine the mediating role of executive function in the relationship between sensory processing and behavior in ADHD. Sixty-three children (51 boys), aged between 7 and 14 years participated in this study. Caregivers completed the Sensory Profile 2 (SP-2), the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function 2 (BRIEF-2), and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) to assess sensory processing, executive function, and behavior, respectively. Positive and significant associations were found between sensory processing, executive function, and behavioral problems. In addition, positive indirect effects between sensory processing and behavior were mediated by executive function. These findings add to other evidence on neurodevelopmental disorders, suggesting that sensory processing may be a foundational aspect related to executive function, which in turn affects behavior in ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":9789,"journal":{"name":"Child Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142459136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-14DOI: 10.1080/09297049.2024.2415531
Eveliina Joensuu, Petriina Munck, Anna H Nyman, Sirkku Setänen, Päivi Rautava, Suvi Stolt
Children born very preterm (<32 gestational weeks and/or birth weight ≤1500 g) are at elevated risk for reading difficulties. This study aimed to investigate reading fluency and reading comprehension at 11 and to analyze the associations between literacy skills at 7 and reading skills at 11 in 134 Finnish-speaking very preterm children. At 11, reading fluency and reading comprehension were evaluated. At 7, pre-reading skills, decoding, and writing were assessed. Results showed that there were more preterm children with weak skills in reading fluency compared to a normative test population. Reading comprehension was age appropriate. Additionally, 62% to 68% of the children with weak literacy skills at 7 had weak reading fluency at 11, compared to those with more advanced skills (43% to 33%, p < 0.001 to 0.026). Respectively, 30% to 50% of the children with weak literacy at 7 had weak reading comprehension at 11 compared to those with more advanced skills (13% to 17%, p < 0.001 to 0.005). Findings highlight the importance of screening reading fluency until 11 years and providing support for the continuum between literacy skills in the beginning of schooling and reading outcome at later school age.
早产儿(p
{"title":"Finnish children born very preterm have good reading comprehension but weak reading fluency at age 11 years - a longitudinal cohort study.","authors":"Eveliina Joensuu, Petriina Munck, Anna H Nyman, Sirkku Setänen, Päivi Rautava, Suvi Stolt","doi":"10.1080/09297049.2024.2415531","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2024.2415531","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children born very preterm (<32 gestational weeks and/or birth weight ≤1500 g) are at elevated risk for reading difficulties. This study aimed to investigate reading fluency and reading comprehension at 11 and to analyze the associations between literacy skills at 7 and reading skills at 11 in 134 Finnish-speaking very preterm children. At 11, reading fluency and reading comprehension were evaluated. At 7, pre-reading skills, decoding, and writing were assessed. Results showed that there were more preterm children with weak skills in reading fluency compared to a normative test population. Reading comprehension was age appropriate. Additionally, 62% to 68% of the children with weak literacy skills at 7 had weak reading fluency at 11, compared to those with more advanced skills (43% to 33%, <i>p</i> < 0.001 to 0.026). Respectively, 30% to 50% of the children with weak literacy at 7 had weak reading comprehension at 11 compared to those with more advanced skills (13% to 17%, <i>p</i> < 0.001 to 0.005). Findings highlight the importance of screening reading fluency until 11 years and providing support for the continuum between literacy skills in the beginning of schooling and reading outcome at later school age.</p>","PeriodicalId":9789,"journal":{"name":"Child Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142459135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-14DOI: 10.1080/09297049.2024.2415146
Laura Haveri, Petriina Munck, Jukka M Leppänen, Satu Korpela, Leena Haataja, Anna H Nyman
Working memory (WM) difficulties are often observed in children born preterm. We examined whether performance-based measures of WM components are associated with parent- and teacher-rated WM difficulties in the everyday life of children born very preterm and/or at very low birth weight (VPT/VLBW) at 11 years (n = 165). The WM components as defined in the original Baddeley's model - phonological loop (PL), visuospatial sketchpad (VS), and central executive (CE) - were assessed with tasks from the Working Memory Test Battery for Children (WMTB-C) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Fourth edition (WISC-IV). Parents and teachers completed the WM subscale of the Behavioral Rating Inventory for Executive Functions (BRIEF). Measures of WM components were modestly associated with BRIEF scores, explaining 18.9% of the variance in parent-rated and 14.0% of teacher-rated WM difficulties. CE was the component most consistently associated with parent- and teacher-rated everyday WM. To conclude, our results suggest that tasks that utilize CE functions may best reflect WM outside of controlled test settings in the follow-up of VPT/VLBW children. However, performance and rating-scale measures provide unique information and are both needed to comprehensively assess WM skills.
{"title":"Association between working memory performance and parent and teacher ratings of working memory in 11-year-old children born preterm.","authors":"Laura Haveri, Petriina Munck, Jukka M Leppänen, Satu Korpela, Leena Haataja, Anna H Nyman","doi":"10.1080/09297049.2024.2415146","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2024.2415146","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Working memory (WM) difficulties are often observed in children born preterm. We examined whether performance-based measures of WM components are associated with parent- and teacher-rated WM difficulties in the everyday life of children born very preterm and/or at very low birth weight (VPT/VLBW) at 11 years (<i>n</i> = 165). The WM components as defined in the original Baddeley's model - phonological loop (PL), visuospatial sketchpad (VS), and central executive (CE) - were assessed with tasks from the Working Memory Test Battery for Children (WMTB-C) and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Fourth edition (WISC-IV). Parents and teachers completed the WM subscale of the Behavioral Rating Inventory for Executive Functions (BRIEF). Measures of WM components were modestly associated with BRIEF scores, explaining 18.9% of the variance in parent-rated and 14.0% of teacher-rated WM difficulties. CE was the component most consistently associated with parent- and teacher-rated everyday WM. To conclude, our results suggest that tasks that utilize CE functions may best reflect WM outside of controlled test settings in the follow-up of VPT/VLBW children. However, performance and rating-scale measures provide unique information and are both needed to comprehensively assess WM skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":9789,"journal":{"name":"Child Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142459134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-02DOI: 10.1080/09297049.2024.2409095
Catherine Monnier, Sophie Bayard
The Hayling Completion Sentence Test (HSCT) is dedicated to assess inhibition of the dominant response and includes two conditions, an automatic condition in which the participants are asked to complete sentences properly and an inhibition condition in which the participants were asked to produce a word completely unrelated to the sentence. The aim of our study was 1) to adapt, 2) to evaluate the psychometric properties and 3) to standardize the HSCT into a French-school-aged pediatric population. We developed the Child-Hayling Test, a child adaptation of the adult French version of the HSCT. The reliability and validity of the Child-Hayling Test were then evaluated in a sample of 134 children aged 6-11 years. In the inhibition condition, children had lower response latency, as they get older. No effect of gender was observed. Reliability indices were low to moderate. Concerning the convergent and divergent validity, response latencies in the Child-Hayling Test correlated with latency scores in the Barre-Joe inhibition test, whereas the Child-Hayling Test scores were not related to children's lexical abilities. The Child-Hayling Test was then administered to 393 typically developing 6- to 11-year-old children. Normative data were calculated in the inhibition condition using a regression-based approach. Regression equations to calculate Z scores are provided for clinical use. In addition, we proposed a clear guideline on how to score children's inhibition responses. The Child-Hayling Test provides a useful tool for assessing prepotent response inhibition in children and can be recommended for use in clinical research and practice.
{"title":"Child-Hayling test for French school-aged children: psychometric properties and normative data.","authors":"Catherine Monnier, Sophie Bayard","doi":"10.1080/09297049.2024.2409095","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2024.2409095","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Hayling Completion Sentence Test (HSCT) is dedicated to assess inhibition of the dominant response and includes two conditions, an automatic condition in which the participants are asked to complete sentences properly and an inhibition condition in which the participants were asked to produce a word completely unrelated to the sentence. The aim of our study was 1) to adapt, 2) to evaluate the psychometric properties and 3) to standardize the HSCT into a French-school-aged pediatric population. We developed the Child-Hayling Test, a child adaptation of the adult French version of the HSCT. The reliability and validity of the Child-Hayling Test were then evaluated in a sample of 134 children aged 6-11 years. In the inhibition condition, children had lower response latency, as they get older. No effect of gender was observed. Reliability indices were low to moderate. Concerning the convergent and divergent validity, response latencies in the Child-Hayling Test correlated with latency scores in the Barre-Joe inhibition test, whereas the Child-Hayling Test scores were not related to children's lexical abilities. The Child-Hayling Test was then administered to 393 typically developing 6- to 11-year-old children. Normative data were calculated in the inhibition condition using a regression-based approach. Regression equations to calculate Z scores are provided for clinical use. In addition, we proposed a clear guideline on how to score children's inhibition responses. The Child-Hayling Test provides a useful tool for assessing prepotent response inhibition in children and can be recommended for use in clinical research and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":9789,"journal":{"name":"Child Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142364568","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-01-26DOI: 10.1080/09297049.2024.2304378
Samantha Levick, Angela D Staples, Seth Warschausky, Alissa Huth-Bocks, H Gerry Taylor, Jennifer C Gidley Larson, Catherine Peterson, Angela Lukomski, Renée Lajiness-O'Neill
Altered motor and social-communicative abilities in infancy have been linked to later ASD diagnosis. Most diagnostic instruments for ASD cannot be utilized until 12 months, and the average child is diagnosed substantially later. Imitation combines motor and social-communicative skills and is commonly atypical in infants at risk for ASD. However, few measures have been developed to assess infant imitation clinically. One barrier to the diagnostic age gap of ASD is accessibility of screening and diagnostic services. Utilization of caregiver report to reliably screen for ASD mitigates such barriers and could aid in earlier detection. The present study developed and validated a caregiver-report measure of infant imitation at 4, 6, and 9 months and explored the relationship between caregiver-reported imitation and motor abilities with later ASD risk. Participants (N = 571) were caregivers of term and preterm infants recruited as part of a large multi-site study of PediaTrac™, a web-based tool for monitoring and tracking infant development. Caregivers completed online surveys and established questionnaires on a schedule corresponding to well-child visits from birth to 18 months, including the M-CHAT-R/F at 18 months. Distinct imitation factors were derived from PediaTrac at 4, 6, and 9 months via factor analysis. The results supported validity of the imitation factors via associations with measures of infant communication (CSBS; ASQ). Imitation and motor skills at 9 months predicted 18-month ASD risk over and above gestational age. Implications for assessment of infant imitation, detecting ASD risk in the first year, and contributing to access to care are discussed.
{"title":"[Formula: see text] Caregiver-reported infant motor and imitation skills predict M-CHAT-R/F.","authors":"Samantha Levick, Angela D Staples, Seth Warschausky, Alissa Huth-Bocks, H Gerry Taylor, Jennifer C Gidley Larson, Catherine Peterson, Angela Lukomski, Renée Lajiness-O'Neill","doi":"10.1080/09297049.2024.2304378","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09297049.2024.2304378","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Altered motor and social-communicative abilities in infancy have been linked to later ASD diagnosis. Most diagnostic instruments for ASD cannot be utilized until 12 months, and the average child is diagnosed substantially later. Imitation combines motor and social-communicative skills and is commonly atypical in infants at risk for ASD. However, few measures have been developed to assess infant imitation clinically. One barrier to the diagnostic age gap of ASD is accessibility of screening and diagnostic services. Utilization of caregiver report to reliably screen for ASD mitigates such barriers and could aid in earlier detection. The present study developed and validated a caregiver-report measure of infant imitation at 4, 6, and 9 months and explored the relationship between caregiver-reported imitation and motor abilities with later ASD risk. Participants (<i>N</i> = 571) were caregivers of term and preterm infants recruited as part of a large multi-site study of PediaTrac™, a web-based tool for monitoring and tracking infant development. Caregivers completed online surveys and established questionnaires on a schedule corresponding to well-child visits from birth to 18 months, including the M-CHAT-R/F at 18 months. Distinct imitation factors were derived from PediaTrac at 4, 6, and 9 months via factor analysis. The results supported validity of the imitation factors via associations with measures of infant communication (CSBS; ASQ). Imitation and motor skills at 9 months predicted 18-month ASD risk over and above gestational age. Implications for assessment of infant imitation, detecting ASD risk in the first year, and contributing to access to care are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9789,"journal":{"name":"Child Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1035-1053"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11272902/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139563733","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-01Epub Date: 2024-02-14DOI: 10.1080/09297049.2024.2304376
Brian L Brooks, Sandra J Mish, William S MacAllister, Taryn B Fay-McClymont, Marsha Vasserman, Elisabeth M S Sherman
Executive skills are critical cognitive skills for everyday functioning in children; accurate measurement using validated tools is thus important. The purpose of this study was to examine concurrent validity between the MEMRY Executive/Working Memory scale and the BRIEF2. Participants included a large pediatric clinical sample who completed parent (n = 567), teacher (n = 148), and self-report (n = 88) scales. All correlations were significant between the MEMRY Executive/Working Memory and the BRIEF2 Global Executive Composite, Cognitive Regulation Index, and Working Memory scale (all r's > .80). Classification agreement metrics ranged from fair to excellent. This study provides evidence of strong concurrent validity of the MEMRY Executive/Working Memory scale as a brief, useful tool for assessing executive functioning using parent, teacher, and self-report versions.
{"title":"Measuring executive functioning with the Multidimensional Everyday Memory Ratings for Youth (MEMRY): concurrent validity with the BRIEF-2 in a large neurological and medical sample.","authors":"Brian L Brooks, Sandra J Mish, William S MacAllister, Taryn B Fay-McClymont, Marsha Vasserman, Elisabeth M S Sherman","doi":"10.1080/09297049.2024.2304376","DOIUrl":"10.1080/09297049.2024.2304376","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Executive skills are critical cognitive skills for everyday functioning in children; accurate measurement using validated tools is thus important. The purpose of this study was to examine concurrent validity between the MEMRY Executive/Working Memory scale and the BRIEF2. Participants included a large pediatric clinical sample who completed parent (<i>n</i> = 567), teacher (<i>n</i> = 148), and self-report (<i>n</i> = 88) scales. All correlations were significant between the MEMRY Executive/Working Memory and the BRIEF2 Global Executive Composite, Cognitive Regulation Index, and Working Memory scale (all r's > .80). Classification agreement metrics ranged from fair to excellent. This study provides evidence of strong concurrent validity of the MEMRY Executive/Working Memory scale as a brief, useful tool for assessing executive functioning using parent, teacher, and self-report versions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9789,"journal":{"name":"Child Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1125-1134"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139729032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}