Child Welfare最新文献

Increased awareness of the conditions associated with prenatal substance exposure may enhance care delivery among professionals working in child welfare. The ways in which prenatal substance exposure intersects with child welfare are critically important, yet prenatal substance exposure knowledge is uneven among these professionals. Also, caregivers may lack information that prepares them to care for children with prenatal substance exposure, particularly children with prenatal alcohol exposure. This study explores what professionals working in child welfare and caregivers know about prenatal substance exposure and prenatal alcohol exposure and their training and support needs.

The mission of child welfare is to ensure children's safety, permanency, and well-being. It is also charged with preserving and strengthening families and with avoiding the removal of children who can be kept at home safely. This paper addresses some of the challenges in meeting these concurrent goals in work with children prenatally exposed to alcohol and their families. Current child welfare practices are unlikely to identify prenatal alcohol exposure or children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD). Yet if this exposure is identified when families come into contact with child welfare, a jurisdiction's laws and safety and risk assessment processes may lead to unnecessary removal of children from their homes, particularly for Black and American Indian/Alaska Native families. Drawing from research and discourse in the field, strategies are described that could help the child welfare system care for children who may be impacted by FASD while preserving their families. A crucial strategy is partnering with key child and family service providers to identify and respond to FASD.

This article presents findings from a mixed-methods study exploring child welfare agency practices addressing children with prenatal substance exposure and their families. Data sources include: (a) interviews with 159 professionals in child welfare; (b) surveys with 271 professionals in child welfare; and (c) a systematic review of state and local child welfare documents guiding processes in the five states in the study sample. Findings from descriptive statistics of survey data, grounded theory analysis of interviews, and content analysis of documents suggest practices center on infants identified by hospitals as affected by prenatal substance exposure. Without practice guidance and access to treatment services, the needs of older children whose prenatal exposure to substances, including alcohol and other types of legal and illegal substances, is not recognized at birth may be overlooked.

The federal Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) requires that a plan of safe care, called a family care plan (FCP) in Connecticut, be developed for all newborns identified as being affected by substance abuse and their caregivers. In Connecticut, FCPs are developed in treatment or hospital settings, not by child protective services. Analyzing data from Connecticut from 2019-2021, we found robust yet uneven implementation of FCPs that may have resulted in inadequate support for some affected caregiver-infant dyads. Additional implementation strategies may be needed to ensure that all dyads receive comprehensive FCPs.

State eligibility for certain federal child welfare funding requires a gubernatorial assurance that infants affected by substances receive plans of safe care (POSC). We conducted 18 interviews with state and county child welfare staff to understand how POSC has been implemented and found variability in practice driven by vague policy, challenges of cross-system collaboration, and a lack of knowledge about substance use disorder. Policy improvements should align requirements with POSC practice and create shared accountability with key partners.

Research indicates that there are more children with prenatal alcohol and other drug exposures in child welfare than in the general population. Using multiple forms of data from staff and caregivers from one urban agency, this exploratory study demonstrated opportunities to inform polices, practice, and data elements regarding this vulnerable group. Findings are discussed within the context of ensuring family preservation, equity and avoiding disproportional race/ethnicity within child welfare when identifying and caring for children with prenatal exposures.