The Nelder–Mead or simplex search algorithm is one of the best known algorithms for unconstrained optimization of non–smooth functions. Even though the basic algorithm is quite simple, it is implemented in many different ways. Apart from some minor computational details, the main difference between various implementations lies in the selection of convergence (or termination) tests, which are used to break the iteration process. A fairly simple efficiency analysis of each iteration step reveals a potential computational bottleneck in the domain convergence test. To be efficient, such a test has to be sublinear in the number of vertices of the working simplex. We have tested some of the most common implementations of the Nelder–Mead algorithm, and none of them is efficient in this sense.
Annie Cuyt, Jan Sijbers, Brigitte Verdonk, Dirk Van Dyck
The region occupied by and the contour of a physical object in 3-dimensional space are in a way dual or interchangeable characteristics of the object: the contour is the region's boundary and the region is contained inside the contour. In the same way the characterization of the object's contour by its Fourier descriptors, and the reconstruction of its region from the object's multidimensional moments, are also dual problems. While both problems are well-understood in two dimensions, the complexity increases tremendously when moving to the three-dimensional world.
In Section 2 we discuss how the latest techniques allow to reconstruct an object's shape from the knowledge of its moments. For 2D significantly different techniques must be used, compared to the general 3D case. In Section 3, the parameterization of a 2D contour onto a unit circle and a 3D surface onto a unit sphere is described. Furthermore, the theory of Fourier descriptors for 2D shape representation and the extension to 3D shape analysis are discussed.
Given a family of curves or surfaces in Rs, an important problem is that of finding a member of the family which gives a “best” fit to m given data points. There are many application areas, for example metrology, computer graphics, pattern recognition, and the most commonly used criterion is the least squares norm. However, there may be wild points in the data, and a more robust estimator such as the l1 norm may be more appropriate. On the other hand, the object of modelling the data may be to assess the quality of a manufactured part, so that accept/reject decisions may be required, and this suggests the use of the Chebyshev norm.