首页 > 最新文献

Applied Turfgrass Science最新文献

英文 中文
Conversion of Kentucky Bluegrass Rough to No-Mow, Low-Input Grasses 肯塔基蓝草原草向免刈低投入草的转化
Pub Date : 2011-09-26 DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2011-0926-02-RS
M. Cavanaugh, E. Watkins, B. Horgan, M. Meyer

With golf course water, fertilizer, and pesticide restrictions on the rise and labor costs continuing to increase, golf course superintendents are looking for ways to reduce maintained Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis L.) rough. The objective of this study was to (i) compare several methods for converting Kentucky bluegrass rough to no-mow, low-input grasses and (ii) determine the best turfgrass species that provides a playable and aesthetically pleasing turfgrass stand for this type of conversion. Five grass species and five conversion methods were evaluated at two locations in Minnesota. Data collected included visual stand quality, tendency for lodging, inflorescence counts, biomass production, Kentucky bluegrass regrowth, and broadleaf weed invasion. At Maple Grove, the fumigation treatment provided the highest visual stand quality ratings and the sod removal treatment at St. Paul provided the highest visual stand quality. Only sheep fescue (Festuca ovina L.) was able to provide acceptable visual stand quality by Year 2 and only at St. Paul. Chewing's fescue (F. rubra L. ssp. Commutata Gaudin) and strong creeping red fescue (F. rubra L.ssp. rubra) were best at resisting broadleaf weed invasion at both locations. Hard fescue (F. brevipila Tracey) was best at resisting lodging along with strong creeping red fescue in Year 2 at both locations.

随着高尔夫球场用水、化肥和农药限制的增加以及劳动力成本的持续增加,高尔夫球场负责人正在寻找减少肯塔基蓝草(Poa pratensis L.)粗草的方法。本研究的目的是(i)比较几种将肯塔基蓝草粗草转化为免刈、低投入草的方法;(ii)确定最佳的草坪草品种,为这种类型的转化提供可玩且美观的草坪草架。对明尼苏达州2个地点的5种草种和5种转换方法进行了评价。收集的数据包括林分质量、倒伏趋势、花序数、生物量、肯塔基蓝草再生和阔叶杂草入侵。在Maple Grove,熏蒸处理提供了最高的视觉林分质量评级,而在St. Paul,除草处理提供了最高的视觉林分质量评级。到第二年,只有羊茅(Festuca ovina L.)能够提供可接受的视觉立地质量,并且仅在圣保罗。咀嚼羊茅(F. rubra L. ssp.)强匍匐红羊茅(f.r rubra L.ssp.);在这两个地点,紫红属植物对阔叶杂草的抗性最强。硬羊茅与强匍匐红羊茅在2年的抗倒伏能力均较好。
{"title":"Conversion of Kentucky Bluegrass Rough to No-Mow, Low-Input Grasses","authors":"M. Cavanaugh,&nbsp;E. Watkins,&nbsp;B. Horgan,&nbsp;M. Meyer","doi":"10.1094/ATS-2011-0926-02-RS","DOIUrl":"10.1094/ATS-2011-0926-02-RS","url":null,"abstract":"<p>With golf course water, fertilizer, and pesticide restrictions on the rise and labor costs continuing to increase, golf course superintendents are looking for ways to reduce maintained Kentucky bluegrass (<i>Poa pratensis</i> L.) rough. The objective of this study was to (i) compare several methods for converting Kentucky bluegrass rough to no-mow, low-input grasses and (ii) determine the best turfgrass species that provides a playable and aesthetically pleasing turfgrass stand for this type of conversion. Five grass species and five conversion methods were evaluated at two locations in Minnesota. Data collected included visual stand quality, tendency for lodging, inflorescence counts, biomass production, Kentucky bluegrass regrowth, and broadleaf weed invasion. At Maple Grove, the fumigation treatment provided the highest visual stand quality ratings and the sod removal treatment at St. Paul provided the highest visual stand quality. Only sheep fescue (<i>Festuca ovina</i> L.) was able to provide acceptable visual stand quality by Year 2 and only at St. Paul. Chewing's fescue (<i>F. rubra</i> L. ssp. <i>Commutata</i> Gaudin) and strong creeping red fescue (<i>F. rubra</i> L.ssp. <i>rubra</i>) were best at resisting broadleaf weed invasion at both locations. Hard fescue (<i>F. brevipila</i> Tracey) was best at resisting lodging along with strong creeping red fescue in Year 2 at both locations.</p>","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1094/ATS-2011-0926-02-RS","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"99400659","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Influence of Cultural Practices on Torpedograss Competition with Two Warm-Season Lawn Grasses 两种暖季草坪草栽培方式对水雷草竞争的影响
Pub Date : 2011-08-05 DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2011-0805-01-RS
Jeffrey S. Beasley, Steven M. Borst, David C. Blouin, Gregg C. Munshaw, Ron E. Strahan

Torpedograss is becoming an increasing weed problem in centipedegrass and St. Augustinegrass home lawns due to sod or soil contamination. Currently, the use of non-selective herbicides and/or renovation is the primary means of torpedograss control. Minimal research has examined cultural methods for torpedograss control; therefore, a study was conducted evaluating nitrogen (N) and mowing heights for the control of torpedograss in centipedegrass and St. Augustinegrass. St. Augustinegrass was fertilized at 0 kg N/ha/month, 50 kg N/ha/month, or 100 kg N/ha/month and maintained at heights of 5.0 cm, 7.6 cm, or 10.2 cm. Centipedegrass was fertilized at 0 kg N/ha/month, 12.5 kg N/ha/month, or 25 kg N/ha/month and mowed at 2.5 cm, 5.0 cm, or 7.6 cm. The highest mowing height resulted in the greatest torpedograss encroachment with each species when compared to the low and recommended heights. Nitrogen fertility had no effect on torpedograss encroachment in either species. All mowing height and N combinations exhibited patterns of increasing torpedograss encroachment over time. These data indicate the use of uncontaminated soils or applications of non-selective herbicides represent the best methods for controlling torpedograss in St. Augustinegrass and centipedegrass.

由于草皮或土壤污染,水雷草在蜈蚣草和圣奥古斯丁草的草坪上日益成为杂草问题。目前,使用非选择性除草剂和/或改造是控制水雷草的主要手段。对控制鱼雷草的培养方法的研究很少;因此,对蜈蚣草和圣奥古斯草进行了氮素和刈割高度的研究。施氮量分别为0 kg N/ha/月、50 kg N/ha/月和100 kg N/ha/月,高度分别为5.0 cm、7.6 cm和10.2 cm。蜈蚣草按0 kg N/ha/月、12.5 kg N/ha/月和25 kg N/ha/月施肥,刈割高度分别为2.5 cm、5.0 cm和7.6 cm。与低高度和推荐高度相比,最高的刈割高度对各种草的侵蚀最大。氮肥肥力对水雷草的入侵均无影响。所有刈割高度和氮素组合均表现出随时间增加的趋势。这些数据表明,使用未受污染的土壤或使用非选择性除草剂是控制圣奥古斯丁草和蜈蚣草中水雷草的最佳方法。
{"title":"Influence of Cultural Practices on Torpedograss Competition with Two Warm-Season Lawn Grasses","authors":"Jeffrey S. Beasley,&nbsp;Steven M. Borst,&nbsp;David C. Blouin,&nbsp;Gregg C. Munshaw,&nbsp;Ron E. Strahan","doi":"10.1094/ATS-2011-0805-01-RS","DOIUrl":"10.1094/ATS-2011-0805-01-RS","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Torpedograss is becoming an increasing weed problem in centipedegrass and St. Augustinegrass home lawns due to sod or soil contamination. Currently, the use of non-selective herbicides and/or renovation is the primary means of torpedograss control. Minimal research has examined cultural methods for torpedograss control; therefore, a study was conducted evaluating nitrogen (N) and mowing heights for the control of torpedograss in centipedegrass and St. Augustinegrass. St. Augustinegrass was fertilized at 0 kg N/ha/month, 50 kg N/ha/month, or 100 kg N/ha/month and maintained at heights of 5.0 cm, 7.6 cm, or 10.2 cm. Centipedegrass was fertilized at 0 kg N/ha/month, 12.5 kg N/ha/month, or 25 kg N/ha/month and mowed at 2.5 cm, 5.0 cm, or 7.6 cm. The highest mowing height resulted in the greatest torpedograss encroachment with each species when compared to the low and recommended heights. Nitrogen fertility had no effect on torpedograss encroachment in either species. All mowing height and N combinations exhibited patterns of increasing torpedograss encroachment over time. These data indicate the use of uncontaminated soils or applications of non-selective herbicides represent the best methods for controlling torpedograss in St. Augustinegrass and centipedegrass.</p>","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1094/ATS-2011-0805-01-RS","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"97449282","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Salinity Tolerance of Cool-Season Turfgrass Cultivars Under Field Conditions 冷季草坪草品种在田间条件下的耐盐性
Pub Date : 2011-07-25 DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2011-0725-01-RS
Matthew J. Koch, Stacy A. Bonos

In order to utilize effluent or wastewater as irrigation on turfgrass sites it will require the identification of cool-season turfgrass cultivars with increased salinity tolerance. Evaluation of current cultivars and experimental selections for salinity tolerance is an important first step in making information available to turfgrass managers. An overhead irrigated field screening method was developed to closely mimic the challenges associated with irrigation of turf with saline water under summer stress conditions. A total 48 clones from each turfgrass cultivar were planted in a randomized complete block design with four replications (12 clones per replication) and were irrigated overhead with saltwater (EC =10 dS/m). This technique effectively identified differences in salinity tolerance, of Kentucky bluegrass, bentgrass, and perennial ryegrass cultivars and selections as measured by percent green ratings. The most salt tolerant cultivars included: Liberator, Eagleton, Diva, and Rhythm Kentucky bluegrasses; Declaration, Kingpin, and 007 creeping bentgrasses; and RKS, Gator 3, and MSH Comp perennial ryegrasses. Cultivars and selections exhibiting the least salinity tolerance were: RSP, A03-TB676, A03-84, and Julia Kentucky bluegrasses; EBM Comp and Tiger II colonial bentgrasses; SR7200 velvet bentgrass; and Fiesta III perennial ryegrass.

为了利用出水或废水灌溉草坪,需要鉴定耐盐性强的冷季草坪品种。对现有品种和耐盐性试验选择的评价是向草坪草管理者提供信息的重要的第一步。开发了一种高架灌溉农田筛选方法,以模拟夏季胁迫条件下用盐水灌溉草皮所带来的挑战。每个草坪草品种共48个无性系,采用随机完全区组设计,4个重复(每个重复12个无性系),用盐水(EC =10 dS/m)浇灌。这项技术有效地识别了肯塔基蓝草、弯草和多年生黑麦草品种和选择的耐盐性差异,并以绿色评级百分比进行了测量。最耐盐的品种包括:解放者、伊格尔顿、黛娃和节奏肯塔基蓝草;宣言,Kingpin和007匍匐草;RKS、Gator 3和MSH比较多年生黑麦草。耐盐性最差的品种和选材为:RSP、A03-TB676、A03-84和Julia Kentucky蓝草;EBM Comp和Tiger II殖民bentgrass;SR7200天鹅绒弯草;和Fiesta III多年生黑麦草。
{"title":"Salinity Tolerance of Cool-Season Turfgrass Cultivars Under Field Conditions","authors":"Matthew J. Koch,&nbsp;Stacy A. Bonos","doi":"10.1094/ATS-2011-0725-01-RS","DOIUrl":"10.1094/ATS-2011-0725-01-RS","url":null,"abstract":"<p>In order to utilize effluent or wastewater as irrigation on turfgrass sites it will require the identification of cool-season turfgrass cultivars with increased salinity tolerance. Evaluation of current cultivars and experimental selections for salinity tolerance is an important first step in making information available to turfgrass managers. An overhead irrigated field screening method was developed to closely mimic the challenges associated with irrigation of turf with saline water under summer stress conditions. A total 48 clones from each turfgrass cultivar were planted in a randomized complete block design with four replications (12 clones per replication) and were irrigated overhead with saltwater (EC =10 dS/m). This technique effectively identified differences in salinity tolerance, of Kentucky bluegrass, bentgrass, and perennial ryegrass cultivars and selections as measured by percent green ratings. The most salt tolerant cultivars included: Liberator, Eagleton, Diva, and Rhythm Kentucky bluegrasses; Declaration, Kingpin, and 007 creeping bentgrasses; and RKS, Gator 3, and MSH Comp perennial ryegrasses. Cultivars and selections exhibiting the least salinity tolerance were: RSP, A03-TB676, A03-84, and Julia Kentucky bluegrasses; EBM Comp and Tiger II colonial bentgrasses; SR7200 velvet bentgrass; and Fiesta III perennial ryegrass.</p>","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1094/ATS-2011-0725-01-RS","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"93985682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Bermudagrass and Zoysiagrass Cultivar Selection: Part 1, Clipping Yield, Scalping Tendency, and Golf Ball Lie 百慕草和结缕草品种选择:第1部分:剪枝产量、剥皮倾向和高尔夫球卧位
Pub Date : 2011-06-30 DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2011-0630-01-RS
Jon M. Trappe, Douglas E. Karcher, Michael D. Richardson, Aaron J. Patton

Bermudagrass (Cynodon spp. Rich.) and zoysiagrass (Zoysia spp. Willd.) are two of the most commonly used turfgrass species on golf course fairways and tees in the southern United States. However, there are few reports directly comparing commonly used cultivars of bermudagrass to commonly used cultivars of zoysiagrass. The objectives of this research were to quantify the clipping yield, percent ball exposed (ball lie), and to identify the scalping tendency for five bermudagrass and seven zoysiagrass cultivars grown in Fayetteville, AR. The cultivars generally producing the lowest clipping yields were ‘Patriot’ bermudagrass and ‘Meyer’ zoysiagrass, while ‘Tifway’ bermudagrass and ‘Palisades’ zoysiagrass generally had the highest clipping yields. On most collection dates, Cynodon spp. yielded more clippings than Zoysia spp. Patriot bermudagrass had the highest scalping tendency across the two years of this study. The cultivars Patriot, ‘Riviera,’ ‘Tifsport,’ and Tifway bermudagrass as well as Meyer and Diamond zoysiagrass had the best ball lie in unmown (five days after mowing) conditions, while Palisades zoysiagrass had the poorest ball lie in unmown conditions. Ball lie was similar for all cultivars immediately following mowing. These studies identified cultivars of bermudagrass and zoysiagrass that have improved clipping yields, scalping tendencies, and golf ball lie.

百慕大草(Cynodon spp. Rich.)和结缕草(Zoysia spp. wild .)是美国南部高尔夫球场球道和球座上最常用的两种草坪草。然而,很少有报道直接比较百慕大草的常用品种与结缕草的常用品种。本研究的目的是量化在费耶特维尔种植的5个百慕大草和7个结缕草品种的剪枝产量、球暴露率(球lie),并确定脱落趋势。剪枝产量最低的品种是“爱国者”百慕大草和“迈耶”结缕草,而“蒂夫威”百慕大草和“帕利塞德”结缕草的剪枝产量最高。在大多数采集日期,沙缕草比结缕草产生更多的剥落,爱国者百慕大草在两年内的剥落趋势最高。Patriot、‘Riviera’、‘Tifsport’和Tifway百慕大草以及Meyer和Diamond结结草在未修剪(修剪后5天)条件下的球躺状态最好,而Palisades结结草在未修剪条件下的球躺状态最差。所有品种割草后立即的球lie相似。这些研究确定了百慕大草和结缕草的栽培品种,它们提高了剪枝产量、剥皮倾向和高尔夫球质量。
{"title":"Bermudagrass and Zoysiagrass Cultivar Selection: Part 1, Clipping Yield, Scalping Tendency, and Golf Ball Lie","authors":"Jon M. Trappe,&nbsp;Douglas E. Karcher,&nbsp;Michael D. Richardson,&nbsp;Aaron J. Patton","doi":"10.1094/ATS-2011-0630-01-RS","DOIUrl":"10.1094/ATS-2011-0630-01-RS","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bermudagrass (<i>Cynodon</i> spp. Rich.) and zoysiagrass (<i>Zoysia</i> spp. Willd.) are two of the most commonly used turfgrass species on golf course fairways and tees in the southern United States. However, there are few reports directly comparing commonly used cultivars of bermudagrass to commonly used cultivars of zoysiagrass. The objectives of this research were to quantify the clipping yield, percent ball exposed (ball lie), and to identify the scalping tendency for five bermudagrass and seven zoysiagrass cultivars grown in Fayetteville, AR. The cultivars generally producing the lowest clipping yields were ‘Patriot’ bermudagrass and ‘Meyer’ zoysiagrass, while ‘Tifway’ bermudagrass and ‘Palisades’ zoysiagrass generally had the highest clipping yields. On most collection dates, <i>Cynodon</i> spp. yielded more clippings than <i>Zoysia</i> spp. Patriot bermudagrass had the highest scalping tendency across the two years of this study. The cultivars Patriot, ‘Riviera,’ ‘Tifsport,’ and Tifway bermudagrass as well as Meyer and Diamond zoysiagrass had the best ball lie in unmown (five days after mowing) conditions, while Palisades zoysiagrass had the poorest ball lie in unmown conditions. Ball lie was similar for all cultivars immediately following mowing. These studies identified cultivars of bermudagrass and zoysiagrass that have improved clipping yields, scalping tendencies, and golf ball lie.</p>","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1094/ATS-2011-0630-01-RS","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"113445805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Bermudagrass and Zoysiagrass Cultivar Selection: Part 2, Divot Recovery 百慕草和结缕草品种选择:第二部分:草皮恢复
Pub Date : 2011-06-30 DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2011-0630-02-RS
Jon M. Trappe, Douglas E. Karcher, Michael D. Richardson, Aaron J. Patton

Golfers commonly remove turf and soil when swinging a golf club causing a divot in the turf. Divot recovery is an important factor that should be considered when selecting a species or cultivar for use on golf course tees or fairways. There are few reports directly comparing the divot recovery among bermudagrass (Cynodon spp. Rich.) and zoysiagrass (Zoysia spp. Willd.) cultivars. Therefore, the objective of this experiment was to quantify divot recovery of several bermudagrass and zoysiagrass cultivars in a combined field experiment. Divot recovery was evaluated on four collection dates for five cultivars of bermudagrass and seven cultivars of zoysiagrass. Cultivars generally with the fastest time to 50% recovery were ‘Princess 77’ and ‘Riviera’ bermudagrass and ‘Palisades’ zoysiagrass. Generally, the cultivars with the slowest time to 50% recovery were ‘Meyer’ and ‘Zenith’ zoysiagrass. Additionally, ‘Tifway’ bermudagrass had similar divot recovery times to ‘El Toro’ and Palisades zoysiagrass. These results demonstrate that differences and similarities exist among bermudagrass and zoysiagrass cultivars for divot recovery, and golf course superintendents can use this information to better select cultivars that could improve surface playing conditions.

高尔夫球手在挥动高尔夫球杆时,通常会清除草皮和土壤,从而在草皮上形成草皮。草皮恢复是一个重要的因素,应考虑选择一个物种或栽培用于高尔夫球场发球台或球道。直接比较百慕大草(Cynodon spp. Rich.)和结缕草(Zoysia spp. wild .)品种间草皮恢复的报道很少。因此,本试验的目的是在田间联合试验中量化几个百慕大草和结缕草品种的草皮恢复。对5个百慕大草品种和7个结缕草品种的4个采集日期进行了草皮恢复评价。通常恢复50%最快的品种是'公主77 '和'里维埃拉'百慕大草和'帕利塞德斯'结日草。一般来说,恢复时间最慢的品种是‘Meyer’和‘Zenith’结缕草。此外,' Tifway '百慕大草的草皮恢复时间与' El Toro '和Palisades结缕草相似。这些结果表明,百慕大草和结结草在草皮恢复方面存在差异和相似之处,高尔夫球场管理者可以利用这些信息更好地选择能够改善地面比赛条件的品种。
{"title":"Bermudagrass and Zoysiagrass Cultivar Selection: Part 2, Divot Recovery","authors":"Jon M. Trappe,&nbsp;Douglas E. Karcher,&nbsp;Michael D. Richardson,&nbsp;Aaron J. Patton","doi":"10.1094/ATS-2011-0630-02-RS","DOIUrl":"10.1094/ATS-2011-0630-02-RS","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Golfers commonly remove turf and soil when swinging a golf club causing a divot in the turf. Divot recovery is an important factor that should be considered when selecting a species or cultivar for use on golf course tees or fairways. There are few reports directly comparing the divot recovery among bermudagrass (<i>Cynodon</i> spp. Rich.) and zoysiagrass (<i>Zoysia</i> spp. Willd.) cultivars. Therefore, the objective of this experiment was to quantify divot recovery of several bermudagrass and zoysiagrass cultivars in a combined field experiment. Divot recovery was evaluated on four collection dates for five cultivars of bermudagrass and seven cultivars of zoysiagrass. Cultivars generally with the fastest time to 50% recovery were ‘Princess 77’ and ‘Riviera’ bermudagrass and ‘Palisades’ zoysiagrass. Generally, the cultivars with the slowest time to 50% recovery were ‘Meyer’ and ‘Zenith’ zoysiagrass. Additionally, ‘Tifway’ bermudagrass had similar divot recovery times to ‘El Toro’ and Palisades zoysiagrass. These results demonstrate that differences and similarities exist among bermudagrass and zoysiagrass cultivars for divot recovery, and golf course superintendents can use this information to better select cultivars that could improve surface playing conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"112466602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Nitrogen Fertility for Establishment of Velvet and Creeping Bentgrass Fairways and Tees 天鹅绒草和匍匐草球道和球台氮肥的建立
Pub Date : 2011-05-17 DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2011-0517-01-RS
Benjamin W. Pease, John C. Stier, Andrew B. Hollman, Brian Horgan

Velvet bentgrass (Agrostis canina L.) has potential as a turf for low-input fairways and tees, but N fertility requirements during establishment are unknown. Our study compared the N fertility requirement of velvet bentgrass (VBG) cultivars to creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) cultivars for fairway or tee establishment. Four N rates (0, 49, 146, and 293 kg/ha in six applications over 12 weeks) were tested on two cultivars of both bentgrass species [‘Memorial’ creeping bentgrass (CBG), ‘Penncross’ CBG, ‘SR7200’ VBG, and ‘Vesper’ VBG], on silt loams in Minnesota and Wisconsin during 2009. Treatments were arranged in a randomized block, split-plot design with four replications. Vesper established slower than Penncross through week 4 or 11, depending on location, after which all bentgrasses had ground cover approaching 100%. Increase in turf cover corresponded with increasing N rate for the first nine weeks after seeding (WAS). While all cultivars showed acceptable quality near trial end, CBG had better quality than Vesper in Wisconsin. In Minnesota, Memorial and SR7200 had better quality than Penncross and Vesper. The two greatest N rates provided similarly acceptable quality by about 8 WAS in both locations, while 0 kg N/ha never provided acceptable quality. All cultivars of VBG and CBG have similar N requirements during fairway or tee establishment.

天鹅绒弯草(Agrostis canina L.)有潜力作为低投入球道和球座的草皮,但在建立期间的氮肥力需求尚不清楚。本研究比较了天鹅绒弯草(VBG)和匍匐弯草(Agrostis stolonifera L.)品种在球道和球座建设过程中对氮素的需要量。2009年,在明尼苏达州和威斯康星州的泥质壤土上对两种弯草品种[' Memorial '匍匐弯草(CBG), ' Penncross ' CBG, ' SR7200 ' VBG和' Vesper ' VBG]进行了四种氮肥(0、49、146和293公斤/公顷,为期12周,分6次施用)的试验。处理采用随机区、裂区设计,共4个重复。在第4周或第11周,Vesper比Penncross生长得慢,这取决于地点,之后所有的bentgrass都有接近100%的地面覆盖。在播种后的前9周,草皮盖度的增加与施氮量的增加呈正相关。近试验结束时,所有品种的品质均可接受,但CBG的品质优于威斯康辛州的Vesper。在明尼苏达州,Memorial和SR7200的质量好于Penncross和Vesper。两个最大氮肥施量在两个地点提供了类似的可接受的质量,约为8 WAS,而0 kg N/ha从未提供可接受的质量。所有VBG和CBG品种在球道或球座建立过程中对氮的需求相似。
{"title":"Nitrogen Fertility for Establishment of Velvet and Creeping Bentgrass Fairways and Tees","authors":"Benjamin W. Pease,&nbsp;John C. Stier,&nbsp;Andrew B. Hollman,&nbsp;Brian Horgan","doi":"10.1094/ATS-2011-0517-01-RS","DOIUrl":"10.1094/ATS-2011-0517-01-RS","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Velvet bentgrass (<i>Agrostis canina</i> L.) has potential as a turf for low-input fairways and tees, but N fertility requirements during establishment are unknown. Our study compared the N fertility requirement of velvet bentgrass (VBG) cultivars to creeping bentgrass (<i>Agrostis stolonifera</i> L.) cultivars for fairway or tee establishment. Four N rates (0, 49, 146, and 293 kg/ha in six applications over 12 weeks) were tested on two cultivars of both bentgrass species [‘Memorial’ creeping bentgrass (CBG), ‘Penncross’ CBG, ‘SR7200’ VBG, and ‘Vesper’ VBG], on silt loams in Minnesota and Wisconsin during 2009. Treatments were arranged in a randomized block, split-plot design with four replications. Vesper established slower than Penncross through week 4 or 11, depending on location, after which all bentgrasses had ground cover approaching 100%. Increase in turf cover corresponded with increasing N rate for the first nine weeks after seeding (WAS). While all cultivars showed acceptable quality near trial end, CBG had better quality than Vesper in Wisconsin. In Minnesota, Memorial and SR7200 had better quality than Penncross and Vesper. The two greatest N rates provided similarly acceptable quality by about 8 WAS in both locations, while 0 kg N/ha never provided acceptable quality. All cultivars of VBG and CBG have similar N requirements during fairway or tee establishment.</p>","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"96250642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Plant Growth Regulator Selection and Application Rate Influence Annual Bluegrass Control in Creeping Bentgrass Putting Greens 植物生长调节剂的选择和施用量对匍匐草推杆果岭蓝草年防治的影响
Pub Date : 2011-05-17 DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2011-0517-02-RS
Christian M. Baldwin, A. Douglas Brede

Field experiments were conducted in 2009 and 2010 on two golf course practice putting greens in Spokane, WA (Esmeralda), and Hayden Lake, ID (Avondale), consisting of an approximate 50% blend of creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) (CBG) and annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.) (ABG). Various regimes of trinexapac-ethyl (TE), flurprimidol (FL), paclobutrazol (PB), and TE + FL were investigated to determine which plant growth regulator (PGR) regime provided the greatest transition from ABG to CBG. Following PGR applications every two weeks over two growing seasons in the Northwest, PB at 0.28 kg/ha and FL at 0.22 and 0.28 kg/ha produced the greatest increase in CBG coverage, followed by TE + FL at 0.04 + 0.10 kg/ha. TE at 0.10 kg/ha consistently resulted in the least amount of CBG compared to other PGR treatments. While PGRs are an effective tool for superintendents to use for ABG suppression on putting greens, PGR selection, application rate, and application timing are important considerations for successful results.

2009年和2010年,在华盛顿州斯波坎(Esmeralda)和爱达荷州海登湖(Avondale)的两个高尔夫球场练习果岭上进行了实地试验,试验由大约50%的匍匐匍匐草(Agrostis stolonifera L.) (CBG)和一年生蓝草(Poa annua L.) (ABG)混合组成。研究了trinexapac-ethyl (TE)、fluprimidol (FL)、paclobutrazol (PB)和TE + FL的不同配型,以确定哪种植物生长调节剂(PGR)配型能最大程度地从ABG过渡到CBG。在西北地区,每两周施用PGR,在两个生长季节中,PB水平为0.28 kg/ha, FL水平为0.22和0.28 kg/ha, CBG盖度增加最大,其次是TE + FL水平为0.04 + 0.10 kg/ha。与其他PGR处理相比,0.10 kg/ha的TE始终产生最少的CBG。虽然PGR是管理者用来抑制果岭上ABG的有效工具,但PGR的选择、施用量和施药时机是成功的重要考虑因素。
{"title":"Plant Growth Regulator Selection and Application Rate Influence Annual Bluegrass Control in Creeping Bentgrass Putting Greens","authors":"Christian M. Baldwin,&nbsp;A. Douglas Brede","doi":"10.1094/ATS-2011-0517-02-RS","DOIUrl":"10.1094/ATS-2011-0517-02-RS","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Field experiments were conducted in 2009 and 2010 on two golf course practice putting greens in Spokane, WA (Esmeralda), and Hayden Lake, ID (Avondale), consisting of an approximate 50% blend of creeping bentgrass (<i>Agrostis stolonifera</i> L.) (CBG) and annual bluegrass (<i>Poa annua</i> L.) (ABG). Various regimes of trinexapac-ethyl (TE), flurprimidol (FL), paclobutrazol (PB), and TE + FL were investigated to determine which plant growth regulator (PGR) regime provided the greatest transition from ABG to CBG. Following PGR applications every two weeks over two growing seasons in the Northwest, PB at 0.28 kg/ha and FL at 0.22 and 0.28 kg/ha produced the greatest increase in CBG coverage, followed by TE + FL at 0.04 + 0.10 kg/ha. TE at 0.10 kg/ha consistently resulted in the least amount of CBG compared to other PGR treatments. While PGRs are an effective tool for superintendents to use for ABG suppression on putting greens, PGR selection, application rate, and application timing are important considerations for successful results.</p>","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1094/ATS-2011-0517-02-RS","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"99907909","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Indaziflam Utilization for Controlling Problematic Turfgrass Weeds 茚地夫兰在草坪杂草防治中的应用
Pub Date : 2011-04-28 DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2011-0428-01-RS
D. Hunter Perry, J. Scott McElroy, Mark C. Doroh, R. H. Walker

Indaziflam is a new herbicide which potentially provides pre- and postemergence control of broadleaf and grass weeds. Two studies were conducted to evaluate indaziflam control of several weed species utilizing different application regimes. Single applications included indaziflam applied at 40 or 60 g ai/ha in October or November, and 20, 40, or 60 g ai/ha in March. Sequential applications included indaziflam applied at 40 followed by (fb) 40 g ai/ha in October and March, 60 fb 20 g ai/ha in October and March, 40 fb 40 g ai/ha in November and March, and 60 fb 20 g ai/ha in November and March. Prodiamine and oxadiazon were also applied as standard comparisons. Indaziflam applied at 60 g ai/ha in November provided the most consistent control across weed species. This treatment controlled annual bluegrass > 90% 20 weeks after treatment (WAT) and large crabgrass > 90% 29 WAT. All sequential indaziflam applications (except for the 40 fb 40 g ai/ha in November and March) controlled annual bluegrass > 90%. All rates and timings of indaziflam controlled lawn burweed at least 40% greater than industry standards. Indaziflam applied at 40 g ai/ha in October and March controlled cock's-comb kyllinga 80%. Indaziflam provided better weed control and longer residual activity than industry standards in some cases, however, weed control varied among species.

茚地夫兰是一种新型除草剂,具有防治阔叶杂草和禾草杂草苗期和苗期的潜力。两项研究评价了不同施用制度对几种杂草的控制效果。单次应用包括在10月或11月以40或60克/公顷的剂量施用茚地兰,在3月以20、40或60克/公顷的剂量施用。顺序施药包括:在10月和3月40分施用茚地兰,10月和3月40分施用,10月和3月60分施用,20分施用,11月和3月40分施用,20分施用,11月和3月60分施用。用丙二胺和恶二唑作标准对照。11月施用60克/公顷的Indaziflam对各种杂草的控制效果最一致。这种处理控制了一年生蓝草;治疗20周后90% (WAT),大杂草;90%的水。所有连续施用indaziflam(除了11月和3月的40 - 40克/公顷)控制了每年的蓝草生长;90%。茚地夫兰对草坪杂草的控制率和时间至少比行业标准高40%。10月和3月施用40克/公顷的茚地夫兰,防治鸡冠病80%。在某些情况下,茚地氟兰比工业标准具有更好的杂草控制效果和更长的残留活性,然而,不同物种的杂草控制效果不同。
{"title":"Indaziflam Utilization for Controlling Problematic Turfgrass Weeds","authors":"D. Hunter Perry,&nbsp;J. Scott McElroy,&nbsp;Mark C. Doroh,&nbsp;R. H. Walker","doi":"10.1094/ATS-2011-0428-01-RS","DOIUrl":"10.1094/ATS-2011-0428-01-RS","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Indaziflam is a new herbicide which potentially provides pre- and postemergence control of broadleaf and grass weeds. Two studies were conducted to evaluate indaziflam control of several weed species utilizing different application regimes. Single applications included indaziflam applied at 40 or 60 g ai/ha in October or November, and 20, 40, or 60 g ai/ha in March. Sequential applications included indaziflam applied at 40 followed by (fb) 40 g ai/ha in October and March, 60 fb 20 g ai/ha in October and March, 40 fb 40 g ai/ha in November and March, and 60 fb 20 g ai/ha in November and March. Prodiamine and oxadiazon were also applied as standard comparisons. Indaziflam applied at 60 g ai/ha in November provided the most consistent control across weed species. This treatment controlled annual bluegrass &gt; 90% 20 weeks after treatment (WAT) and large crabgrass &gt; 90% 29 WAT. All sequential indaziflam applications (except for the 40 fb 40 g ai/ha in November and March) controlled annual bluegrass &gt; 90%. All rates and timings of indaziflam controlled lawn burweed at least 40% greater than industry standards. Indaziflam applied at 40 g ai/ha in October and March controlled cock's-comb kyllinga 80%. Indaziflam provided better weed control and longer residual activity than industry standards in some cases, however, weed control varied among species.</p>","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1094/ATS-2011-0428-01-RS","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"112708689","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36
Multi-year Roughstalk Bluegrass Control in Creeping Bentgrass with Bispyribac-sodium and Sulfosulfuron 双嘧菌酯钠和磺胺磺隆对匍匐曲草的多年防治
Pub Date : 2011-04-25 DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2011-0425-01-RS
Patrick E. McCullough, Stephen E. Hart

Bispyribac-sodium and sulfosulfuron are labeled for roughstalk bluegrass control in creeping bentgrass but comprehensive investigations are limited for long-term control. The objective of these field experiments was to investigate roughstalk bluegrass control with these herbicides on a creeping bentgrass fairway over three years. Bispyribac-sodium was applied twice at 37, 74, or 111 g a.i./ha or thrice at 37 or 74 g/ha. Sulfosulfuron was applied twice or thrice at 6.5 or 13 g a.i./ha or once at 26 g/ha. Creeping bentgrass chlorosis from herbicides was less than 20% by two to three weeks after applications while all treatments generally provided substantial reductions in roughstalk bluegrass cover by late July. However, roughstalk bluegrass regrowth was detected by October in all three years suggesting herbicide applications visually eliminated foliage but did not control the entire plant. Overall, bispyribac-sodium and sulfosulfuron effectively suppressed roughstalk bluegrass ground cover in summer months but regrowth during fall months prevented long-term successful control.

双嘧菌酯钠和磺胺磺隆对匍匐弯草的粗秆蓝草有一定的防治作用,但对其长期防治的综合研究还很有限。这些田间试验的目的是在三年的时间里研究这些除草剂在匍匐的弯草球道上对粗秆蓝草的控制。双嘧菌酯钠按37、74或111克/公顷施用两次,或按37或74克/公顷施用三次。磺磺隆按6.5或13克a.i./公顷施用2次或3次,或按26克/公顷施用1次。施用除草剂后的2 - 3周,匍匐曲草的黄化率低于20%,而到7月下旬,所有处理通常都能大幅减少粗秆蓝草的覆盖。然而,在所有三年中,十月都检测到粗秆蓝草的再生,这表明除草剂在视觉上消除了叶子,但没有控制整个植物。总体而言,双嘧菌酯钠和磺胺磺隆在夏季有效地抑制了粗秆蓝草的地被覆盖,但在秋季的再生阻碍了长期有效的控制。
{"title":"Multi-year Roughstalk Bluegrass Control in Creeping Bentgrass with Bispyribac-sodium and Sulfosulfuron","authors":"Patrick E. McCullough,&nbsp;Stephen E. Hart","doi":"10.1094/ATS-2011-0425-01-RS","DOIUrl":"10.1094/ATS-2011-0425-01-RS","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bispyribac-sodium and sulfosulfuron are labeled for roughstalk bluegrass control in creeping bentgrass but comprehensive investigations are limited for long-term control. The objective of these field experiments was to investigate roughstalk bluegrass control with these herbicides on a creeping bentgrass fairway over three years. Bispyribac-sodium was applied twice at 37, 74, or 111 g a.i./ha or thrice at 37 or 74 g/ha. Sulfosulfuron was applied twice or thrice at 6.5 or 13 g a.i./ha or once at 26 g/ha. Creeping bentgrass chlorosis from herbicides was less than 20% by two to three weeks after applications while all treatments generally provided substantial reductions in roughstalk bluegrass cover by late July. However, roughstalk bluegrass regrowth was detected by October in all three years suggesting herbicide applications visually eliminated foliage but did not control the entire plant. Overall, bispyribac-sodium and sulfosulfuron effectively suppressed roughstalk bluegrass ground cover in summer months but regrowth during fall months prevented long-term successful control.</p>","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1094/ATS-2011-0425-01-RS","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"105066881","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Roughstalk Bluegrass Contamination in Creeping Bentgrass Seed Lots 匍匐弯草苗区粗秆蓝草污染
Pub Date : 2011-04-22 DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2011-0422-01-BR
Z. J. Reicher, L. W. Nees, M. D. Levy
{"title":"Roughstalk Bluegrass Contamination in Creeping Bentgrass Seed Lots","authors":"Z. J. Reicher,&nbsp;L. W. Nees,&nbsp;M. D. Levy","doi":"10.1094/ATS-2011-0422-01-BR","DOIUrl":"10.1094/ATS-2011-0422-01-BR","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"81108244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
期刊
Applied Turfgrass Science
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1