首页 > 最新文献

Applied Turfgrass Science最新文献

英文 中文
Effects of Mowing and Rolling Frequency, Primo Maxx, and Roller Weight on Annual Bluegrass Putting Green Speed 刈滚频率、刈滚质量和刈滚质量对蓝草年推杆速度的影响
Pub Date : 2013-05-29 DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2013-0529-01-RS
Brian W McDonald, Robert C. Golembiewski, Thomas W. Cook, Tod M. Blankenship

This study was conducted on an annual bluegrass (Poa annua L.) putting green and examined the effects on ball roll distance (BRD) from five mowing and rolling frequency regimes using both a light and heavy roller with and without Primo Maxx. Treatments included: (i) mow daily with no rolling; (ii) mow daily + roll M, W, F; (iii) mow daily + roll daily; (iv) mow M, W, F, Sa + roll daily; and (v) alternate mowing and rolling daily. For six weeks during the summers of 2009 and 2010, ball roll distances were measured in the morning and afternoon, Monday through Friday. BRD decreased an average of 0.5 ft from the morning to the afternoon. The heavy roller significantly increased BRD in 2009 by 0.4 ft or less, but not in 2010. Primo Maxx increased BRD an average of 0.5 ft in 2010, but not in 2009. Mowing + rolling daily produced the longest BRD followed by mow daily + roll M, W, F and mow M, W, F, Sa + roll every day which was 0.5 ft less. Mow daily with no rolling and alternate mowing and rolling daily had the shortest BRD averaging 1.2 ft less than mowing and rolling daily.

本研究以一年生蓝草(Poa annua L.)果岭为研究对象,研究了五种刈割和滚动频率对球滚距离(BRD)的影响,分别使用轻型和重型压辊加Primo Maxx和不加Primo Maxx。处理方法包括:(i)每天一次,不滚动;(ii)现日+卷M、W、F;(iii)现日+卷日;(iv)现在M、W、F、Sa +每天滚动;(五)每天交替割草和滚草。在2009年和2010年夏季的六周时间里,研究人员在周一到周五的上午和下午测量了球滚距离。BRD从早上到下午平均下降了0.5英尺。重型压路机在2009年显著增加了0.4英尺或更少的BRD,但在2010年没有。Primo Maxx在2010年平均增加了0.5英尺的BRD,但在2009年没有。割草+每天滚草产生的BRD最长,其次是割草+每天滚M、W、F,割草M、W、F、Sa +每天滚草少0.5 ft。无滚动刈割和交替刈割和滚动刈割的BRD最短,平均比滚动刈割和滚动刈割的BRD短1.2英尺。
{"title":"Effects of Mowing and Rolling Frequency, Primo Maxx, and Roller Weight on Annual Bluegrass Putting Green Speed","authors":"Brian W McDonald,&nbsp;Robert C. Golembiewski,&nbsp;Thomas W. Cook,&nbsp;Tod M. Blankenship","doi":"10.1094/ATS-2013-0529-01-RS","DOIUrl":"10.1094/ATS-2013-0529-01-RS","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study was conducted on an annual bluegrass (<i>Poa annua L.)</i> putting green and examined the effects on ball roll distance (BRD) from five mowing and rolling frequency regimes using both a light and heavy roller with and without Primo Maxx. Treatments included: (i) mow daily with no rolling; (ii) mow daily + roll M, W, F; (iii) mow daily + roll daily; (iv) mow M, W, F, Sa + roll daily; and (v) alternate mowing and rolling daily. For six weeks during the summers of 2009 and 2010, ball roll distances were measured in the morning and afternoon, Monday through Friday. BRD decreased an average of 0.5 ft from the morning to the afternoon. The heavy roller significantly increased BRD in 2009 by 0.4 ft or less, but not in 2010. Primo Maxx increased BRD an average of 0.5 ft in 2010, but not in 2009. Mowing + rolling daily produced the longest BRD followed by mow daily + roll M, W, F and mow M, W, F, Sa + roll every day which was 0.5 ft less. Mow daily with no rolling and alternate mowing and rolling daily had the shortest BRD averaging 1.2 ft less than mowing and rolling daily.</p>","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1094/ATS-2013-0529-01-RS","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"108092811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Safety of Labeled Herbicides for Broadleaf Weed Control in Creeping Bentgrass Putting Greens 标记除草剂防治匍匐弯草推杆草地阔叶杂草的安全性研究
Pub Date : 2013-05-23 DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2013-0523-01-BR
A. J. Patton, D. V. Weisenberger, J. T. Brosnan, G. K. Breeden
While most broadleaf weeds cannot survive at mowing heights used to maintain putting greens, species such as white clover (Trifolium repens), mouse-ear chickweed (Cerastium vulgatum), and prostrate spurge (Euphorbia humistrata) can persist even with the use of sound management practices. Broadleaf herbicides like 2,4-D have been used on putting greens since the 1940s for weed control (1,2), but many golf course superintendents are hesitant to use broadleaf herbicides on their putting greens for fear that turfgrass injury might occur. There is a paucity of data on the safety of broadleaf herbicides on putting greens despite pesticide labels that suggest they can be used without injuring turf. The objective of this experiment was to determine the safety of postemergence broadleaf herbicides on putting green height creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) turf.
{"title":"Safety of Labeled Herbicides for Broadleaf Weed Control in Creeping Bentgrass Putting Greens","authors":"A. J. Patton,&nbsp;D. V. Weisenberger,&nbsp;J. T. Brosnan,&nbsp;G. K. Breeden","doi":"10.1094/ATS-2013-0523-01-BR","DOIUrl":"10.1094/ATS-2013-0523-01-BR","url":null,"abstract":"While most broadleaf weeds cannot survive at mowing heights used to maintain putting greens, species such as white clover (Trifolium repens), mouse-ear chickweed (Cerastium vulgatum), and prostrate spurge (Euphorbia humistrata) can persist even with the use of sound management practices. Broadleaf herbicides like 2,4-D have been used on putting greens since the 1940s for weed control (1,2), but many golf course superintendents are hesitant to use broadleaf herbicides on their putting greens for fear that turfgrass injury might occur. There is a paucity of data on the safety of broadleaf herbicides on putting greens despite pesticide labels that suggest they can be used without injuring turf. The objective of this experiment was to determine the safety of postemergence broadleaf herbicides on putting green height creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) turf.","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1094/ATS-2013-0523-01-BR","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"93198378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Converting Cool-Season Bluegrass or Fescue to Warm-Season Buffalograss 将冷季蓝草或羊茅转化为暖季水牛草
Pub Date : 2013-05-01 DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-5821.2013.tb00001.x
{"title":"Converting Cool-Season Bluegrass or Fescue to Warm-Season Buffalograss","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/j.1552-5821.2013.tb00001.x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1552-5821.2013.tb00001.x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/j.1552-5821.2013.tb00001.x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"137467685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy of Corn Gluten Meal for Common Dandelion and Smooth Crabgrass Control Compared to Nitrogen Fertilizers 玉米蛋白粉与氮肥对照防治蒲公英、草的效果
Pub Date : 2013-04-26 DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2013-0426-01-RS
Rodney St. John, Nadia DeMuro

Corn gluten meal (CGM) is a naturally derived weed control/fertilizer that may allow for reduction in herbicide use on turfgrass. Previously it has been reported that CGM inhibits root production and reduces naturally occurring weed populations. It is unclear if weed population reductions are due to herbicidal activity or increased competition of the turfgrass species from nitrogen in CGM. Our objective was to compare three N sources (CGM, Milorganite, and urea) with three application strategies (equivalent of 1.8 lb N/1000 ft2 with half applied in spring plus half applied in fall, 3.6 lb N/1000 ft2 with half applied in spring plus half applied in fall, and 3.6 lb/1000 ft2 applied in spring). CGM provided equivalent or lower quality ratings compared to Milorganite or urea throughout the two-year study. Common dandelion (Taraxacum officinale G.H. Weber ex Wiggers) counts (0 to 1004/100 ft2) and smooth crabgrass [Digitaria ischaemum (Shreb) Shreb. ex Muhl.] coverage (5 to 90%) were similar for treatments receiving CGM, Milorganite, and urea. In this study, CGM provided no additional benefit in weed control compared to products containing only N. Fertilizing with 3.6 lb of N/1000 ft2 resulted in higher turf quality with less weeds than plots receiving only 1.8 lb of N/1000 ft2.

玉米蛋白粉(CGM)是一种天然衍生的杂草控制/肥料,可以减少草坪上除草剂的使用。以前有报道称,CGM抑制根系生长,减少自然发生的杂草数量。目前尚不清楚杂草数量的减少是由于除草活性还是由于CGM中氮对草坪草物种的竞争增加。我们的目标是比较三种氮源(CGM, Milorganite和尿素)和三种施用策略(相当于1.8磅N/1000 ft2,一半在春季施用,一半在秋季施用,3.6磅N/1000 ft2,一半在春季施用,一半在秋季施用,3.6磅/1000 ft2在春季施用)。在为期两年的研究中,与Milorganite或尿素相比,CGM提供了相同或更低的质量评级。普通蒲公英(Taraxacum officinale G.H. Weber ex Wiggers)计数(0至1004/100平方英尺)和光滑的蟹草[Digitaria ischaemum (Shreb) Shreb]。Muhl交货。CGM、Milorganite和尿素处理的覆盖率(5% ~ 90%)相似。在本研究中,与只含氮的产品相比,CGM在杂草控制方面没有提供额外的好处。与只施用1.8磅氮/1000平方英尺的地块相比,施用3.6磅氮/1000平方英尺的地块草坪质量更高,杂草更少。
{"title":"Efficacy of Corn Gluten Meal for Common Dandelion and Smooth Crabgrass Control Compared to Nitrogen Fertilizers","authors":"Rodney St. John,&nbsp;Nadia DeMuro","doi":"10.1094/ATS-2013-0426-01-RS","DOIUrl":"10.1094/ATS-2013-0426-01-RS","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Corn gluten meal (CGM) is a naturally derived weed control/fertilizer that may allow for reduction in herbicide use on turfgrass. Previously it has been reported that CGM inhibits root production and reduces naturally occurring weed populations. It is unclear if weed population reductions are due to herbicidal activity or increased competition of the turfgrass species from nitrogen in CGM. Our objective was to compare three N sources (CGM, Milorganite, and urea) with three application strategies (equivalent of 1.8 lb N/1000 ft<sup>2</sup> with half applied in spring plus half applied in fall, 3.6 lb N/1000 ft<sup>2</sup> with half applied in spring plus half applied in fall, and 3.6 lb/1000 ft<sup>2</sup> applied in spring). CGM provided equivalent or lower quality ratings compared to Milorganite or urea throughout the two-year study. Common dandelion (<i>Taraxacum officinale</i> G.H. Weber ex Wiggers) counts (0 to 1004/100 ft<sup>2</sup>) and smooth crabgrass [<i>Digitaria ischaemum</i> (Shreb) Shreb. ex Muhl.] coverage (5 to 90%) were similar for treatments receiving CGM, Milorganite, and urea. In this study, CGM provided no additional benefit in weed control compared to products containing only N. Fertilizing with 3.6 lb of N/1000 ft<sup>2</sup> resulted in higher turf quality with less weeds than plots receiving only 1.8 lb of N/1000 ft<sup>2</sup>.</p>","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1094/ATS-2013-0426-01-RS","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"104649891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Control of Lesser Swinecress in Creeping Bentgrass Putting Greens 匍匐草推杆果岭小猪瘟的防治
Pub Date : 2013-04-25 DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2013-0425-01-RS
J. A. Hoyle, C. M. Straw, G. M. Henry, T. Cooper, L. L. Beck, A. J. Hephner
J. A. Hoyle, Postdoctoral Research Associate, C. M. Straw, Graduate Research Assistant, G. M. Henry, Associate Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602; T. Cooper, Graduate Research Assistant, L. L. Beck, Graduate Research Assistant, and A. J. Hephner, Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409
{"title":"Control of Lesser Swinecress in Creeping Bentgrass Putting Greens","authors":"J. A. Hoyle,&nbsp;C. M. Straw,&nbsp;G. M. Henry,&nbsp;T. Cooper,&nbsp;L. L. Beck,&nbsp;A. J. Hephner","doi":"10.1094/ATS-2013-0425-01-RS","DOIUrl":"10.1094/ATS-2013-0425-01-RS","url":null,"abstract":"J. A. Hoyle, Postdoctoral Research Associate, C. M. Straw, Graduate Research Assistant, G. M. Henry, Associate Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602; T. Cooper, Graduate Research Assistant, L. L. Beck, Graduate Research Assistant, and A. J. Hephner, Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Plant and Soil Science, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"96582088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Effect of Preemergence Herbicides on the Recovery of Bermudagrass from Spring Dead Spot 出苗前除草剂对百慕草春季死斑恢复的影响
Pub Date : 2013-03-28 DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2013-0328-01-RS
L. L. Beck, T. Cooper, A. J. Hephner, C. M. Straw, G. M. Henry

Field experiments were conducted in Texas to examine the recovery of a bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon × C. transvaalensis (L.) Pers.] fairway from spring dead spot (SDS) disease following preemergence (PRE) herbicide applications. In 2011 and 2012 bermudagrass recovery from SDS in the non-treated check plots (46 and 59%, respectively) was similar to bermudagrass recovery in response to oxadiazon at 3.4 kg/ha (55 and 57%, respectively) 14 weeks after treatment (WAT). Pendimethalin at 2.5 kg/ha resulted in 33 to 38% bermudagrass recovery from SDS 14 WAT. In 2011, oryzalin (1.68 kg/ha), dithiopyr (0.56 kg/ha), prodiamine (0.73 kg/ha), and dimethenamid (1.68 kg/ha) applications resulted in 21 to 25% bermudagrass recovery from SDS 14 WAT. In 2012, bermudagrass exhibited similar recovery in response to prodiamine and oryzalin (24 and 26%, respectively), while response to dithiopyr and dimethenamid was 33 and 34%, respectively, 14 WAT. Bermudagrass exhibited the least amount of recovery (13 to 14%) in response to indaziflam at 0.035 kg/ha, regardless of year. Oxadiazon can be safely used as a PRE option when bermudagrass is recovering from SDS, while the use of oryzalin, prodiamine, dithiopyr, dimethenamid, pendimethalin, and indaziflam may limit recovery and further contribute to a weakened turfgrass system.

在德克萨斯州进行了实地试验,研究了百慕大草(Cynodon dactylon × C. transvaalensis)的恢复情况。珀耳斯。在出现前(PRE)除草剂施用后,球道免受春季死斑(SDS)病的影响。2011年和2012年,未处理的对照区SDS的百德草恢复率(分别为46%和59%)与处理后14周(WAT) 3.4 kg/ha(分别为55%和57%)的百德草恢复率相似。施用2.5 kg/ha的二甲甲烷可使SDS - 14 WAT的百慕大草回收率达到33% ~ 38%。2011年,在SDS - 14 WAT中,使用米草灵(1.68公斤/公顷)、双硫吡虫啉(0.56公斤/公顷)、丙二胺(0.73公斤/公顷)和二甲氰胺(1.68公斤/公顷),百慕草的回收率为21%至25%。2012年,百米草对丙二胺和谷氨酰胺的应答率相似(分别为24%和26%),而对硫吡菌酯和二甲胺的应答率分别为33%和34% (14 WAT)。在0.035 kg/ha的indaziflam处理下,百慕大草的回收率最低(13% ~ 14%),与年份无关。当百慕大草从SDS中恢复时,可以安全地使用恶二唑作为PRE的选择,而使用米扎林、丙二胺、双硫吡醇、二甲脒、苯二甲基灵和吲唑氟可能会限制恢复,并进一步导致草坪草系统的削弱。
{"title":"Effect of Preemergence Herbicides on the Recovery of Bermudagrass from Spring Dead Spot","authors":"L. L. Beck,&nbsp;T. Cooper,&nbsp;A. J. Hephner,&nbsp;C. M. Straw,&nbsp;G. M. Henry","doi":"10.1094/ATS-2013-0328-01-RS","DOIUrl":"10.1094/ATS-2013-0328-01-RS","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Field experiments were conducted in Texas to examine the recovery of a bermudagrass [<i>Cynodon dactylon</i> × <i>C. transvaalensis</i> (L.) Pers.] fairway from spring dead spot (SDS) disease following preemergence (PRE) herbicide applications. In 2011 and 2012 bermudagrass recovery from SDS in the non-treated check plots (46 and 59%, respectively) was similar to bermudagrass recovery in response to oxadiazon at 3.4 kg/ha (55 and 57%, respectively) 14 weeks after treatment (WAT). Pendimethalin at 2.5 kg/ha resulted in 33 to 38% bermudagrass recovery from SDS 14 WAT. In 2011, oryzalin (1.68 kg/ha), dithiopyr (0.56 kg/ha), prodiamine (0.73 kg/ha), and dimethenamid (1.68 kg/ha) applications resulted in 21 to 25% bermudagrass recovery from SDS 14 WAT. In 2012, bermudagrass exhibited similar recovery in response to prodiamine and oryzalin (24 and 26%, respectively), while response to dithiopyr and dimethenamid was 33 and 34%, respectively, 14 WAT. Bermudagrass exhibited the least amount of recovery (13 to 14%) in response to indaziflam at 0.035 kg/ha, regardless of year. Oxadiazon can be safely used as a PRE option when bermudagrass is recovering from SDS, while the use of oryzalin, prodiamine, dithiopyr, dimethenamid, pendimethalin, and indaziflam may limit recovery and further contribute to a weakened turfgrass system.</p>","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1094/ATS-2013-0328-01-RS","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"111453769","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Phosphorus Availability In Turfgrass Root Zones After Applications of Organic and Synthetic Nitrogen Fertilizers 施用有机和合成氮肥对草坪草根区磷有效性的影响
Pub Date : 2013-03-25 DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2013-0325-01-RS
Gwen K. Stahnke, E. D. Miltner, C. G. Cogger, R. A. Luchterhand, R. E. Bembenek

Organic fertilizers have increased in popularity over the past ten years due to the belief they are more environmentally sound to use than synthetic fertilizers. Most fertilizers derived from organic materials contain phosphorus as well as nitrogen, so use may be affected in states that legislate the application of P to lawns. States are considering exempting organic fertilizers from their zero-P legislation, as Wisconsin did, because it is thought that P from organic sources is less likely to be lost in leachate or runoff. Fertilizers are applied on turfgrasses as needed based on N form and content. Many organic fertilizers contain as much P as N in their formulations, and therefore similar amounts of P and N are applied with each application. Soil tests in native soil and a fairway sand and peat mix used in the Pacific Northwest showed that organic fertilizers applied at rates to provide adequate N for acceptable turf increased soil Bray-1 P levels from 16 to 18 mg/kg to 23 to 66 mg/kg within 3 years. Oxalate extractable Fe, Al, and P was determined for all treatments in both soils and used to calculate phosphorus saturation (PSIox). PSIox values from sand treated with one organic fertilizer source were significantly higher than measured in other treatments, indicating future risk of P loss with repeated applications of this organic fertilizer.

在过去的十年里,有机肥越来越受欢迎,因为人们相信它们比合成肥料更环保。大多数从有机材料中提取的肥料都含有磷和氮,因此在立法向草坪施用磷的州,使用可能会受到影响。像威斯康辛州一样,各州正在考虑将有机肥料从零磷立法中豁免出来,因为人们认为有机来源的磷在渗滤液或径流中损失的可能性较小。根据氮素形态和含量的需要,在草坪草上施用化肥。许多有机肥在配方中所含的磷和氮一样多,因此每次施用的磷和氮量差不多。在太平洋西北地区对原生土壤和球道砂泥炭混合土进行的土壤试验表明,按照为可接受的草皮提供足够N的比例施用有机肥,可在3年内将土壤bray1 - P水平从16至18 mg/kg提高到23至66 mg/kg。测定了两种土壤中所有处理的草酸盐可提取铁、铝和磷,并用于计算磷饱和度(PSIox)。用一种有机肥源处理的沙的PSIox值显著高于其他处理,表明重复施用这种有机肥会造成未来磷损失的风险。
{"title":"Phosphorus Availability In Turfgrass Root Zones After Applications of Organic and Synthetic Nitrogen Fertilizers","authors":"Gwen K. Stahnke,&nbsp;E. D. Miltner,&nbsp;C. G. Cogger,&nbsp;R. A. Luchterhand,&nbsp;R. E. Bembenek","doi":"10.1094/ATS-2013-0325-01-RS","DOIUrl":"10.1094/ATS-2013-0325-01-RS","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Organic fertilizers have increased in popularity over the past ten years due to the belief they are more environmentally sound to use than synthetic fertilizers. Most fertilizers derived from organic materials contain phosphorus as well as nitrogen, so use may be affected in states that legislate the application of P to lawns. States are considering exempting organic fertilizers from their zero-P legislation, as Wisconsin did, because it is thought that P from organic sources is less likely to be lost in leachate or runoff. Fertilizers are applied on turfgrasses as needed based on N form and content. Many organic fertilizers contain as much P as N in their formulations, and therefore similar amounts of P and N are applied with each application. Soil tests in native soil and a fairway sand and peat mix used in the Pacific Northwest showed that organic fertilizers applied at rates to provide adequate N for acceptable turf increased soil Bray-1 P levels from 16 to 18 mg/kg to 23 to 66 mg/kg within 3 years. Oxalate extractable Fe, Al, and P was determined for all treatments in both soils and used to calculate phosphorus saturation (PSI<sub>ox</sub>). PSI<sub>ox</sub> values from sand treated with one organic fertilizer source were significantly higher than measured in other treatments, indicating future risk of P loss with repeated applications of this organic fertilizer.</p>","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1094/ATS-2013-0325-01-RS","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"103053463","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Salinity (NaCl), Waterlogging, and their Combined Effects on Germination and Seedling Growth of Four Turfgrass Species 盐、涝渍及其对四种草坪草种子萌发和幼苗生长的综合影响
Pub Date : 2013-02-26 DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2013-0226-01-RS
Qi Zhang, Alan J. Zuk, Kevin Rue

Salinity and waterlogging are two major abiotic stressors commonly associated with irrigated soils. In this experiment, tall fescue cv. Stonewall, Kentucky bluegrass cv. Bewitched, blue grama ecotype Bad River, and buffalograss cv. Texoka were germinated under well-drained (control), waterlogging (i.e., flooding), saline (5 g NaCl/liter), or a combination of waterlogging and saline conditions (saline-waterlogging) in two greenhouses (Study I and II). Plants were evaluated on germination percentage, shoot and root fresh weight, and the longest root length. Waterlogging with tap water did not inhibit seed germination or seedling growth. Germination, shoot and root fresh weight, and the longest root length were significantly decreased under saline conditions, alone or combined with waterlogging. The highest reduction occurred under saline condition alone which ranged from 36% of the control in the longest root length in Study I to 1% of the control in root fresh weight in Study II. Soil salinity levels were similar between the control and waterlogging treatments, which was significantly lower than the salinity treatment and the combined effects. Tall fescue was the most tolerant to both salinity and waterlogging stresses. Kentucky bluegrass, blue grama, and buffalograss showed a similar level of tolerance to salinity, waterlogging, and the combined stress.

盐渍化和内涝是灌溉土壤中常见的两大非生物胁迫源。在本实验中,高羊茅cv。石墙,肯塔基蓝草cv。蛊惑,蓝色格拉玛生态型巴德河,和水牛草cv。在两个温室(研究1和研究2)中,分别在排水良好(对照)、涝渍(即淹水)、盐渍(5 g NaCl/l)或涝渍和盐渍混合(盐渍-涝渍)条件下发芽,评价植株的发芽率、茎部和根鲜重以及最长根长。自来水淹水对种子萌发和幼苗生长没有抑制作用。盐渍处理、单独处理和渍水处理均显著降低了幼苗的萌发率、茎、根鲜重和最长根长。单在生理盐水条件下,减少幅度最大,从研究1中最长根长减少36%到研究2中根鲜重减少1%。渍水处理和对照处理的土壤盐分水平基本一致,显著低于渍水处理和渍水处理的土壤盐分水平。高羊茅对盐渍和涝渍胁迫的耐受性最强。肯塔基蓝草、蓝草和水牛草对盐度、涝渍和综合胁迫的耐受性相似。
{"title":"Salinity (NaCl), Waterlogging, and their Combined Effects on Germination and Seedling Growth of Four Turfgrass Species","authors":"Qi Zhang,&nbsp;Alan J. Zuk,&nbsp;Kevin Rue","doi":"10.1094/ATS-2013-0226-01-RS","DOIUrl":"10.1094/ATS-2013-0226-01-RS","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Salinity and waterlogging are two major abiotic stressors commonly associated with irrigated soils. In this experiment, tall fescue cv. Stonewall, Kentucky bluegrass cv. Bewitched, blue grama ecotype Bad River, and buffalograss cv. Texoka were germinated under well-drained (control), waterlogging (i.e., flooding), saline (5 g NaCl/liter), or a combination of waterlogging and saline conditions (saline-waterlogging) in two greenhouses (Study I and II). Plants were evaluated on germination percentage, shoot and root fresh weight, and the longest root length. Waterlogging with tap water did not inhibit seed germination or seedling growth. Germination, shoot and root fresh weight, and the longest root length were significantly decreased under saline conditions, alone or combined with waterlogging. The highest reduction occurred under saline condition alone which ranged from 36% of the control in the longest root length in Study I to 1% of the control in root fresh weight in Study II. Soil salinity levels were similar between the control and waterlogging treatments, which was significantly lower than the salinity treatment and the combined effects. Tall fescue was the most tolerant to both salinity and waterlogging stresses. Kentucky bluegrass, blue grama, and buffalograss showed a similar level of tolerance to salinity, waterlogging, and the combined stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1094/ATS-2013-0226-01-RS","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"112349849","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Postemergence Herbicide Safety and Efficacy for Control of Common Bermudagrass in a Zoysiagrass Fairway 结缕草球道中常见百慕草苗期除草剂的安全性和有效性
Pub Date : 2013-02-26 DOI: 10.1094/ATS-2013-0226-01-BR
Enzhan Song, Xi Xiong
Golf course superintendents in the Transition Zone of the United States struggle to limit common bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] infestations in zoysiagrass (Zoysia japonica Steud.) fairways. When tank-mixed with triclopyr, aryloxyphenoxypropionate (AOPP) herbicides such as fenoxaprop and fluazifop result in more injury to bermudagrass than zoysiagrass and up to 76% suppression of bermudagrass (3). An alternative tank-mix partner with AOPP herbicides for selective removal of bermudagrass is mesotrione. Willis et al. (4) reported that mesotrione reduced bermudagrass cover by 45 to 98% when applied alone or tank-mixed with AOPP herbicides. Although the label indicates potential phytotoxicity to zoysiagrass, Huckabay (2) reported that three sequential applications of mesotrione up to 0.12 lb/acre resulted only in a maximum of 15% injury to ‘Meyer’ zoysiagrass. To date, there are no studies evaluating tank mixtures of AOPP herbicides with mesotrione on golf course fairways to determine long-term control of bermudagrass in zoysiagrass turf. Field plots were established on the 9th fairway of The Falls Golf Club in O’Fallon, MO. The fairway was established with ‘Westwood’ bermudagrass (1) in 1994 and renovated to ‘Meyer’ zoysiagrass by sod in 2009, following three sequential applications of glyphosate at 4 lb/acre applied four weeks apart. Shortly after sodding, bermudagrass began invading fairways and becoming interwoven with zoysiagrass. The fairway soil was a Keswick silt loam with a pH of 6.7 and 4.5% organic matter. The fairway was maintained at a 0.56-inch mowing height and received a total of 3 lb N/1000 ft2 fertilizer annually. Field plots measuring 5 by 10 ft were established on two locations of the same fairway and arranged as a randomized complete block design with four replications for one location, and three replications at the second location due to space limitations. Locations were fairly uniform with the possible exception that one area was heavily trafficked with golf carts. In addition to an untreated control, treatments included fenoxaprop or fluazifop tank-mixed with triclopyr or mesotrione and applied to the same plots over two years (Table 1). The initial application was made on 9 June 2010, with sequential applications made 3, 6, 8, and 10 weeks after initial treatment (WAIT) in the first growing season, and 52, 56, and 60 WAIT during the second growing season. Treatments were tank mixed with a non-ionic surfactant at 0.25% v/v, and applied with a CO -pressurized backpack sprayer calibrated to apply 22 gal/acre at a spray pressure of 40 PSI using four TeeJet XR8002 flat fan nozzles (Spraying Systems Co., Wheaton, IL). Zoysiagrass injury was rated on a 0 to 100% scale with 0 = no injury and 100% = complete death. Bermudagrass coverage was rated on a 0 to 100% scale, with 0% = no bermudagrass and 100% = complete bermudagrass coverage. Results were analyzed by PROC MIXED of SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and mean s
{"title":"Postemergence Herbicide Safety and Efficacy for Control of Common Bermudagrass in a Zoysiagrass Fairway","authors":"Enzhan Song,&nbsp;Xi Xiong","doi":"10.1094/ATS-2013-0226-01-BR","DOIUrl":"10.1094/ATS-2013-0226-01-BR","url":null,"abstract":"Golf course superintendents in the Transition Zone of the United States struggle to limit common bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] infestations in zoysiagrass (Zoysia japonica Steud.) fairways. When tank-mixed with triclopyr, aryloxyphenoxypropionate (AOPP) herbicides such as fenoxaprop and fluazifop result in more injury to bermudagrass than zoysiagrass and up to 76% suppression of bermudagrass (3). An alternative tank-mix partner with AOPP herbicides for selective removal of bermudagrass is mesotrione. Willis et al. (4) reported that mesotrione reduced bermudagrass cover by 45 to 98% when applied alone or tank-mixed with AOPP herbicides. Although the label indicates potential phytotoxicity to zoysiagrass, Huckabay (2) reported that three sequential applications of mesotrione up to 0.12 lb/acre resulted only in a maximum of 15% injury to ‘Meyer’ zoysiagrass. To date, there are no studies evaluating tank mixtures of AOPP herbicides with mesotrione on golf course fairways to determine long-term control of bermudagrass in zoysiagrass turf. Field plots were established on the 9th fairway of The Falls Golf Club in O’Fallon, MO. The fairway was established with ‘Westwood’ bermudagrass (1) in 1994 and renovated to ‘Meyer’ zoysiagrass by sod in 2009, following three sequential applications of glyphosate at 4 lb/acre applied four weeks apart. Shortly after sodding, bermudagrass began invading fairways and becoming interwoven with zoysiagrass. The fairway soil was a Keswick silt loam with a pH of 6.7 and 4.5% organic matter. The fairway was maintained at a 0.56-inch mowing height and received a total of 3 lb N/1000 ft2 fertilizer annually. Field plots measuring 5 by 10 ft were established on two locations of the same fairway and arranged as a randomized complete block design with four replications for one location, and three replications at the second location due to space limitations. Locations were fairly uniform with the possible exception that one area was heavily trafficked with golf carts. In addition to an untreated control, treatments included fenoxaprop or fluazifop tank-mixed with triclopyr or mesotrione and applied to the same plots over two years (Table 1). The initial application was made on 9 June 2010, with sequential applications made 3, 6, 8, and 10 weeks after initial treatment (WAIT) in the first growing season, and 52, 56, and 60 WAIT during the second growing season. Treatments were tank mixed with a non-ionic surfactant at 0.25% v/v, and applied with a CO -pressurized backpack sprayer calibrated to apply 22 gal/acre at a spray pressure of 40 PSI using four TeeJet XR8002 flat fan nozzles (Spraying Systems Co., Wheaton, IL). Zoysiagrass injury was rated on a 0 to 100% scale with 0 = no injury and 100% = complete death. Bermudagrass coverage was rated on a 0 to 100% scale, with 0% = no bermudagrass and 100% = complete bermudagrass coverage. Results were analyzed by PROC MIXED of SAS 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) and mean s","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1094/ATS-2013-0226-01-BR","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"111746154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
To Help Homeowners, Industry Personnel, UF/IFAS Posts Videos on Turfgrass Research 为了帮助房主,行业人员,UF/IFAS发布了草坪草研究的视频
Pub Date : 2013-02-01 DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-5821.2013.tb00002.x
{"title":"To Help Homeowners, Industry Personnel, UF/IFAS Posts Videos on Turfgrass Research","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/j.1552-5821.2013.tb00002.x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1552-5821.2013.tb00002.x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100111,"journal":{"name":"Applied Turfgrass Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/j.1552-5821.2013.tb00002.x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138030315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Applied Turfgrass Science
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1