Measurements of length and mass are used in many research fields, and such data are often collected from samples that have been preserved in ethanol or frozen prior to data collection. Since many preservation methods affect the size and shape of soft-bodied animals, species-specific correction factors are used. Here, we calculated ethanol and freezing shrinkage correction factors for the European eel, Anguilla anguilla Linnaeus, 1758, and investigated how preservation duration and individual size affected shrinkage. We also investigated if freezing had an impact on the size of the eyes and pectoral fins, which could affect maturation stage classification. We found that preservation in 95% ethanol and freezing decreased body length and mass, as expected. Time kept in ethanol did not affect shrinkage. Time kept in freezer had some effect on shrinkage, and the model fit suggested inclusion of days frozen for body mass shrinkage. That, however, only had negligible improvement on the model. For preservation in freezer, shrinkage was greater for lengths below 330 mm and mass below 100 g, compared to eels above these sizes. However, applying a size threshold to the analysis only generated negligible improvement of the model fit, meaning that specific shrinkage factors for different sizes are not needed. We also found that freezing induced shrinking in eye size, while the pectoral fin increased in size. The increase in pectoral fin length is however believed to be due to a measurement deviation. User-friendly formulas for all correction factors are provided. The application of these factors should be restricted to the European eel within the size range used in this paper.
{"title":"A Correcting Factor for the Reduction of Body Length and Mass of European Eel After Ethanol Preservation and After Freezing","authors":"Josefin Sundin, John Persson, Stefan Skoglund","doi":"10.1002/aff2.70094","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aff2.70094","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Measurements of length and mass are used in many research fields, and such data are often collected from samples that have been preserved in ethanol or frozen prior to data collection. Since many preservation methods affect the size and shape of soft-bodied animals, species-specific correction factors are used. Here, we calculated ethanol and freezing shrinkage correction factors for the European eel, <i>Anguilla anguilla</i> Linnaeus, 1758, and investigated how preservation duration and individual size affected shrinkage. We also investigated if freezing had an impact on the size of the eyes and pectoral fins, which could affect maturation stage classification. We found that preservation in 95% ethanol and freezing decreased body length and mass, as expected. Time kept in ethanol did not affect shrinkage. Time kept in freezer had some effect on shrinkage, and the model fit suggested inclusion of days frozen for body mass shrinkage. That, however, only had negligible improvement on the model. For preservation in freezer, shrinkage was greater for lengths below 330 mm and mass below 100 g, compared to eels above these sizes. However, applying a size threshold to the analysis only generated negligible improvement of the model fit, meaning that specific shrinkage factors for different sizes are not needed. We also found that freezing induced shrinking in eye size, while the pectoral fin increased in size. The increase in pectoral fin length is however believed to be due to a measurement deviation. User-friendly formulas for all correction factors are provided. The application of these factors should be restricted to the European eel within the size range used in this paper.</p>","PeriodicalId":100114,"journal":{"name":"Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries","volume":"5 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aff2.70094","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144935208","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rebecca Cates, Juliana Cornett, Courtney Hart, Cody Pinger, John Harley, Kate Laboda, Kelly Koehler, Muriel Dittrich, Jordan Hollarsmith
The farming of Pacific oysters (Crassostrea [Magallana] gigas) is a rapidly growing industry in Alaska, where farms represent some of the highest latitude oyster cultivation efforts in the world. Little is known about the nearshore oceanography where Alaskan farms are located, or how the subarctic marine context influences oyster tissue quality. This research begins to elucidate those relationships and seasonal variation therein through regular sampling of water column parameters, phytoplankton community composition, and Pacific oyster tissue. Results suggest both benefits and challenges to cultivating Pacific oysters in this dynamic region in Alaska. Benefits included low temperatures that inhibited spawning, resulting in Pacific oysters with year-round high levels of lipids and polyunsaturated fatty acids. Challenges included a later onset of the spring phytoplankton bloom, resulting in a short growing season compared to other growing regions, occasional blooms of the harmful algal genus Alexandrium spp. that resulted in periods of elevated levels of paralytic shellfish toxins, and intensifying climate variability and ocean acidification. The results of this study provide a better understanding of nearshore dynamics in the estuarine environment of Southeast Alaska's inside waters, which will aid in future site suitability analyses and improve our understanding of cultivating Pacific oysters in this region. As increasingly extreme summer heatwaves contribute to oyster mortality events and other challenges at lower latitude farms, the relatively cold waters at Southeast Alaska oyster farms may offer a buffer against stressors associated with climate variability.
{"title":"Oceanography and Pacific Oyster Biochemical Composition in a Novel Oyster-Growing Region","authors":"Rebecca Cates, Juliana Cornett, Courtney Hart, Cody Pinger, John Harley, Kate Laboda, Kelly Koehler, Muriel Dittrich, Jordan Hollarsmith","doi":"10.1002/aff2.70114","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aff2.70114","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The farming of Pacific oysters (<i>Crassostrea [Magallana] gigas</i>) is a rapidly growing industry in Alaska, where farms represent some of the highest latitude oyster cultivation efforts in the world. Little is known about the nearshore oceanography where Alaskan farms are located, or how the subarctic marine context influences oyster tissue quality. This research begins to elucidate those relationships and seasonal variation therein through regular sampling of water column parameters, phytoplankton community composition, and Pacific oyster tissue. Results suggest both benefits and challenges to cultivating Pacific oysters in this dynamic region in Alaska. Benefits included low temperatures that inhibited spawning, resulting in Pacific oysters with year-round high levels of lipids and polyunsaturated fatty acids. Challenges included a later onset of the spring phytoplankton bloom, resulting in a short growing season compared to other growing regions, occasional blooms of the harmful algal genus <i>Alexandrium</i> spp. that resulted in periods of elevated levels of paralytic shellfish toxins, and intensifying climate variability and ocean acidification. The results of this study provide a better understanding of nearshore dynamics in the estuarine environment of Southeast Alaska's inside waters, which will aid in future site suitability analyses and improve our understanding of cultivating Pacific oysters in this region. As increasingly extreme summer heatwaves contribute to oyster mortality events and other challenges at lower latitude farms, the relatively cold waters at Southeast Alaska oyster farms may offer a buffer against stressors associated with climate variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":100114,"journal":{"name":"Aquaculture, Fish and Fisheries","volume":"5 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aff2.70114","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144918707","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The cover image is based on the Original Article by Earthworm (Eisenia fetida) Meal as Fishmeal Replacement in the diet of Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758) fingerlings by Belay Abdissa et al., https://doi.org/10.1002/aff2.70105.