首页 > 最新文献

Continence Reports最新文献

英文 中文
Paraurethral leiomyoma in a 22-year-old woman: A case report 22岁女性尿道旁平滑肌瘤1例报告
Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.contre.2022.100014
Samia Aijaz, Novera Chughtai, Urooj Kashif, Summera Malik

Background:

Leiomyoma is a benign fibromuscular neoplasm originating from smooth muscle cells. Paraurethral leiomyoma is an extremely rare, benign, hormone-dependent​ growth from the mesenchymal cells in paraurethral space of female urethra. They usually appear in the reproductive age group women, mean age of presentation being approximately 41 years.

Case presentation:

A 22-year-old woman presented with palpable mass at vagina and weak urinary stream. She underwent clinical examination and MRI imaging followed by transvaginal excision of the mass. Histopathological examination confirmed paraurethral leiomyoma.

Conclusion:

Paraurethral leiomyoma make up approximately five percent of urethral tumors. This case depicts the presentation and treatment of a paraurethral leiomyoma in one of the youngest women reported in the literature.

背景:平滑肌瘤是一种起源于平滑肌细胞的良性纤维肌肉肿瘤。尿道旁平滑肌瘤是一种极为罕见的良性肿瘤,生长于女性尿道旁间隙的间充质细胞,依赖激素。通常出现在育龄妇女,平均发病年龄约为41岁。病例介绍:22岁女性,阴道可触及肿块,尿流弱。她接受了临床检查和MRI成像,然后经阴道切除肿块。组织病理学检查证实为尿道旁平滑肌瘤。结论:尿道旁平滑肌瘤约占尿道肿瘤的5%。本病例描述的介绍和治疗的尿道旁平滑肌瘤在一个最年轻的妇女在文献报道。
{"title":"Paraurethral leiomyoma in a 22-year-old woman: A case report","authors":"Samia Aijaz,&nbsp;Novera Chughtai,&nbsp;Urooj Kashif,&nbsp;Summera Malik","doi":"10.1016/j.contre.2022.100014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.contre.2022.100014","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background:</h3><p>Leiomyoma is a benign fibromuscular neoplasm originating from smooth muscle cells. Paraurethral leiomyoma is an extremely rare, benign, hormone-dependent​ growth from the mesenchymal cells in paraurethral space of female urethra. They usually appear in the reproductive age group women, mean age of presentation being approximately 41 years.</p></div><div><h3>Case presentation:</h3><p>A 22-year-old woman presented with palpable mass at vagina and weak urinary stream. She underwent clinical examination and MRI imaging followed by transvaginal excision of the mass. Histopathological examination confirmed paraurethral leiomyoma.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>Paraurethral leiomyoma make up approximately five percent of urethral tumors. This case depicts the presentation and treatment of a paraurethral leiomyoma in one of the youngest women reported in the literature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100330,"journal":{"name":"Continence Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772974522000084/pdfft?md5=3148ca495710e6a7fa6e4a6fa7ccd488&pid=1-s2.0-S2772974522000084-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82867650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Time needed to perform intermittent catheterization in adults with spinal cord injury: A pilot randomized controlled cross-over trial 在脊髓损伤的成人中进行间歇导尿所需的时间:一项随机对照交叉试验
Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.contre.2022.100010
Karthik Gopalakrishnan , Nick Fabrin Nielsen , Andrea L. Ramirez , Jeppe Sørensen , Matthias Walter , Andrei V. Krassioukov

Introduction:

Intermittent catheterization (IC), considered the gold standard for bladder management for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) with sufficient dexterity, is usually performed using hydrophilic (HPC) or non-hydrophilic catheters (non-HPC). Currently, there is little evidence on the temporal burden associated with IC in general. Our objective was to compare both catheters regarding their time requirement for IC and participant satisfaction.

Materials and Methods:

Twenty individuals with chronic (>1-year) SCI were randomized to undergo two cross-over assessments within 10 days (i.e., either starting with HPC or non-HPC). We measured the time taken to perform IC using a 13 step pre-determined protocol. Furthermore, we assessed user satisfaction of both catheters using a Likert scale. Time to perform IC and participant satisfaction were compared using non-parametric statistics. Results are presented as median with lower and upper quartiles.

Results:

Participants using an HPC spent significantly less time overall to perform IC [283 s (242; 352) vs. 373 s (249; 441), p=0.01] and to prepare a catheter [15 s (10; 20) vs. 41 (20; 69), p=0.002, i.e. adjusted for multiple comparisons] compared to non-HPC. No significant differences between both catheters were found with respect to participant satisfaction.

Conclusions:

This crossover RCT revealed that the overall time to perform IC appears to be a significant temporal burden for individuals with SCI independent of the catheter type. Further, we found that the preparation and usage of HPC for IC is faster compared to non-HPC. These findings warrant a larger trial to further assess the temporal burden of IC in this cohort.

导论:间歇性导尿(IC),被认为是灵巧度足够的脊髓损伤(SCI)患者膀胱管理的金标准,通常使用亲水性(HPC)或非亲水性导尿(非HPC)。目前,很少有证据表明与一般IC相关的时间负担。我们的目的是比较两种导管对IC的时间要求和参与者满意度。材料与方法:20例慢性(1年)脊髓损伤患者随机在10天内进行两次交叉评估(即从HPC或非HPC开始)。我们使用预先确定的13步协议测量执行IC所需的时间。此外,我们使用李克特量表评估两种导管的用户满意度。使用非参数统计比较执行IC的时间和参与者满意度。结果以上下四分位数的中位数表示。结果:使用HPC的参与者在执行IC的总体时间上显著缩短[283 s (242;352) vs. 373 s (249;441), p=0.01],准备导管[15 s (10;20) vs. 41 (20;69), p=0.002,即调整多重比较]与非hpc相比。两种导管在受试者满意度方面无显著差异。结论:这项交叉随机对照试验显示,对脊髓损伤患者来说,执行IC的总时间似乎是一个重要的时间负担,与导管类型无关。此外,我们发现HPC在集成电路中的制备和使用速度比非HPC更快。这些发现支持更大规模的试验,以进一步评估该队列中IC的时间负担。
{"title":"Time needed to perform intermittent catheterization in adults with spinal cord injury: A pilot randomized controlled cross-over trial","authors":"Karthik Gopalakrishnan ,&nbsp;Nick Fabrin Nielsen ,&nbsp;Andrea L. Ramirez ,&nbsp;Jeppe Sørensen ,&nbsp;Matthias Walter ,&nbsp;Andrei V. Krassioukov","doi":"10.1016/j.contre.2022.100010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contre.2022.100010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction:</h3><p>Intermittent catheterization (IC), considered the gold standard for bladder management for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) with sufficient dexterity, is usually performed using hydrophilic (HPC) or non-hydrophilic catheters (non-HPC). Currently, there is little evidence on the temporal burden associated with IC in general. Our objective was to compare both catheters regarding their time requirement for IC and participant satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods:</h3><p>Twenty individuals with chronic (&gt;1-year) SCI were randomized to undergo two cross-over assessments within 10 days (i.e., either starting with HPC or non-HPC). We measured the time taken to perform IC using a 13 step pre-determined protocol. Furthermore, we assessed user satisfaction of both catheters using a Likert scale. Time to perform IC and participant satisfaction were compared using non-parametric statistics. Results are presented as median with lower and upper quartiles.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>Participants using an HPC spent significantly less time overall to perform IC [283 s (242; 352) vs. 373 s (249; 441), <span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>01</mn></mrow></math></span>] and to prepare a catheter [15 s (10; 20) vs. 41 (20; 69), <span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>002</mn></mrow></math></span>, i.e. adjusted for multiple comparisons] compared to non-HPC. No significant differences between both catheters were found with respect to participant satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><p>This crossover RCT revealed that the overall time to perform IC appears to be a significant temporal burden for individuals with SCI independent of the catheter type. Further, we found that the preparation and usage of HPC for IC is faster compared to non-HPC. These findings warrant a larger trial to further assess the temporal burden of IC in this cohort.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100330,"journal":{"name":"Continence Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772974522000060/pdfft?md5=ca05d1e28503710ac0c471ea98f5df07&pid=1-s2.0-S2772974522000060-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"137156006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Persistent need to urinate: A common sensory symptom leading to urinary discomfort. A study of 79 cases 持续需要小便:导致泌尿系统不适的常见感觉症状。一项对79例病例的研究
Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.contre.2022.100007
Claire Hentzen , Jalesh N. Panicker , Martina Pericolini , Enrico Finazzi Agrò , Camille Chesnel , Emilie Blouet , Frederique Le Breton , Samer Sheikh Ismaël , Rebecca Haddad , Gerard Amarenco

Aims:

An unpleasant, inappropriate, and persistent need to urinate (PNU) is a sensory symptom reported by some patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). However, no detailed definition of this symptom exists. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of patients reporting PNU and to discuss the pathophysiology and therapeutic approach.

Methods:

The clinical and urodynamic findings of patients presenting with PNU without chronic bladder pain syndrome or neurological or urological conditions between October 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The treatment efficacy was self-reported at follow-up as “total cure”, “significant improvement” or “no modification”.

Results:

Seventy-nine patients were included (51 women (65%), mean age 49 years (Standard Deviation (SD) 18)). The mean duration of symptoms was 7 years (SD 11). Frequency was commonly associated with PNU (mean interval between voids 103 min (SD 69)) and 50 patients (63%) reported nocturia. Voiding difficulties were described in 33 cases (40%). The mean first desire to void was 112mL (SD 93) with normal maximum cystometric capacity of 397mL (SD 135), and 5 patients had detrusor overactivity. Proposed treatments were tibial nerve stimulation (n=25) with a total cure or significant improvement in 17 cases, alpha-blockers (n=8) with an improvement in 4 patients, antimuscarinics (n=29) with an improvement in only 3 patients, and antidepressant or antiepileptic (n=8) with an improvement in 5 patients.

Conclusion:

PNU is poorly described but could be responsible for LUTS. Further studies to understand the underlying mechanisms and to assess the therapeutic efficacy of the different options are required.

目的:不愉快的、不适当的、持续的尿需要(PNU)是一些下尿路症状(LUTS)患者报告的一种感觉症状。然而,这种症状没有详细的定义。本研究旨在描述报告PNU的患者的特征,并讨论病理生理和治疗方法。方法:回顾性分析2019年10月至2020年12月期间无慢性膀胱疼痛综合征或神经系统或泌尿系统疾病的PNU患者的临床和尿动力学表现。治疗效果在随访时自我报告为“完全治愈”、“显著改善”或“无改变”。结果:纳入79例患者(女性51例(65%),平均年龄49岁(标准差(SD) 18)。平均症状持续时间为7年(SD 11)。尿频通常与PNU(平均排尿间隔103分钟(标准差69))相关,50例(63%)患者报告夜尿。33例(40%)出现排尿困难。平均首次排尿欲望为112mL (SD 93),正常最大膀胱容量为397mL (SD 135), 5例患者有逼尿肌过度活动。建议的治疗方法是胫骨神经刺激(n=25), 17例完全治愈或显著改善,α -受体阻滞剂(n=8)改善4例,抗毒菌素(n=29)改善3例,抗抑郁或抗癫痫药物(n=8)改善5例。结论:对PNU的描述较差,但可能导致LUTS。需要进一步的研究来了解潜在的机制并评估不同选择的治疗效果。
{"title":"Persistent need to urinate: A common sensory symptom leading to urinary discomfort. A study of 79 cases","authors":"Claire Hentzen ,&nbsp;Jalesh N. Panicker ,&nbsp;Martina Pericolini ,&nbsp;Enrico Finazzi Agrò ,&nbsp;Camille Chesnel ,&nbsp;Emilie Blouet ,&nbsp;Frederique Le Breton ,&nbsp;Samer Sheikh Ismaël ,&nbsp;Rebecca Haddad ,&nbsp;Gerard Amarenco","doi":"10.1016/j.contre.2022.100007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.contre.2022.100007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims:</h3><p>An unpleasant, inappropriate, and persistent need to urinate (PNU) is a sensory symptom reported by some patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). However, no detailed definition of this symptom exists. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of patients reporting PNU and to discuss the pathophysiology and therapeutic approach.</p></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><p>The clinical and urodynamic findings of patients presenting with PNU without chronic bladder pain syndrome or neurological or urological conditions between October 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The treatment efficacy was self-reported at follow-up as “total cure”, “significant improvement” or “no modification”.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>Seventy-nine patients were included (51 women (65%), mean age 49 years (Standard Deviation (SD) 18)). The mean duration of symptoms was 7 years (SD 11). Frequency was commonly associated with PNU (mean interval between voids 103 min (SD 69)) and 50 patients (63%) reported nocturia. Voiding difficulties were described in 33 cases (40%). The mean first desire to void was 112mL (SD 93) with normal maximum cystometric capacity of 397mL (SD 135), and 5 patients had detrusor overactivity. Proposed treatments were tibial nerve stimulation (n=25) with a total cure or significant improvement in 17 cases, alpha-blockers (n=8) with an improvement in 4 patients, antimuscarinics (n=29) with an improvement in only 3 patients, and antidepressant or antiepileptic (n=8) with an improvement in 5 patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>PNU is poorly described but could be responsible for LUTS. Further studies to understand the underlying mechanisms and to assess the therapeutic efficacy of the different options are required.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100330,"journal":{"name":"Continence Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772974522000047/pdfft?md5=718c703a6e14cf0cab595cdebccc74b8&pid=1-s2.0-S2772974522000047-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85941046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neurogenic voiding dysfunction induced by vitamin B6 overdose 维生素B6过量致神经源性排尿功能障碍
Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.contre.2022.100004
T. Van den Broeck , B. Crul , J.P. Heesakkers

We present a case of a man who developed a neurogenic detrusor acontractility because of too much Vitamin B6 or pyridoxine intake. He developed voiding dysfunction and sensory neuropathy in both legs (numbness). The analysis gave no other explanation for the development of his complaints than the intake of excessive multivitamins, resulting in a supraphysiologic vitamin B6 level associated with neurotoxicity. Multivitamins are not only regarded as healthy but may also cause severe physical complaints, including voiding LUTS. Caretakers should bear that in mind when they encounter patients with voiding difficulties.

我们提出了一个病例的男子谁开发了神经源性逼尿肌收缩,因为过多的维生素B6或吡哆醇摄入。他出现排尿功能障碍和双腿感觉神经病变(麻木)。分析除了过量摄入多种维生素,导致与神经毒性相关的超生理维生素B6水平外,没有给出其他解释。多种维生素不仅被认为是健康的,而且可能导致严重的身体不适,包括排尿。当护理人员遇到排尿困难的病人时,应牢记这一点。
{"title":"Neurogenic voiding dysfunction induced by vitamin B6 overdose","authors":"T. Van den Broeck ,&nbsp;B. Crul ,&nbsp;J.P. Heesakkers","doi":"10.1016/j.contre.2022.100004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.contre.2022.100004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We present a case of a man who developed a neurogenic detrusor acontractility because of too much Vitamin B6 or pyridoxine intake. He developed voiding dysfunction and sensory neuropathy in both legs (numbness). The analysis gave no other explanation for the development of his complaints than the intake of excessive multivitamins, resulting in a supraphysiologic vitamin B6 level associated with neurotoxicity. Multivitamins are not only regarded as healthy but may also cause severe physical complaints, including voiding LUTS. Caretakers should bear that in mind when they encounter patients with voiding difficulties.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100330,"journal":{"name":"Continence Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772974522000023/pdfft?md5=1b22c76ba2f9c710c94d9af7dd486c3b&pid=1-s2.0-S2772974522000023-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82477608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Underactive and low compliance bladder: A possible Presentation of COVID-19 vaccination 膀胱不活跃和低顺应性:COVID-19疫苗接种的可能表现
Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.contre.2022.100002
Hanieh Salehi-Pourmehr , Nooriyeh Dalir Akbari , Sakineh Hajebrahimi , Siamak Salehi

Vaccine-related adverse events have been increasingly reported as the COVID-19 vaccination campaign progresses worldwide. Urological symptoms after COVID-19 vaccination are reported rarely. Herein, we report a case of urinary retention following the second dose of Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine injection.

随着全球COVID-19疫苗接种运动的进展,疫苗相关不良事件的报告越来越多。COVID-19疫苗接种后泌尿系统症状很少报道。在此,我们报告一例牛津/阿斯利康第二剂COVID-19疫苗注射后尿潴留。
{"title":"Underactive and low compliance bladder: A possible Presentation of COVID-19 vaccination","authors":"Hanieh Salehi-Pourmehr ,&nbsp;Nooriyeh Dalir Akbari ,&nbsp;Sakineh Hajebrahimi ,&nbsp;Siamak Salehi","doi":"10.1016/j.contre.2022.100002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.contre.2022.100002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Vaccine-related adverse events have been increasingly reported as the COVID-19 vaccination campaign progresses worldwide. Urological symptoms after COVID-19 vaccination are reported rarely. Herein, we report a case of urinary retention following the second dose of Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine injection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100330,"journal":{"name":"Continence Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772974522000011/pdfft?md5=6949e3f725e443b832ad6b4ae5e32774&pid=1-s2.0-S2772974522000011-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77219665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Time needed to perform intermittent catheterization in adults with spinal cord injury: A pilot randomized controlled cross-over study 对脊髓损伤的成人进行间歇导尿所需的时间:一项试点随机对照交叉研究
Pub Date : 2021-08-18 DOI: 10.1101/2021.08.16.21253936
K. Gopalakrishnan, Nick F. Nielsen, Andrea L. Ramirez, J. Sørensen, M. Walter, A. Krassioukov
Background: Intermittent catheterization (IC), considered the gold standard for bladder management for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) with sufficient dexterity, is usually performed using hydrophilic (HPC) or non-hydrophilic (non-HPC) catheters. Currently, there is no evidence on the temporal burden associated with IC with either catheter. Objective: To compare both catheters regarding their time requirement for IC and participant satisfaction. Design, setting and participants: Twenty individuals with chronic (>1-year) SCI at any spinal segment were randomized to undergo two cross-over assessments within 10 days (i.e., either starting with HPC or non-HPC). We measured time taken to perform IC using a 13 step pre-determined IC protocol (e.g., enter bathroom, wash hands, transfer to toilet, etc.). Furthermore, we assessed user satisfaction of both catheters using a Likert scale (i.e., strongly agree=5, strongly disagree=1). Outcome measures and statistical analysis: Time (i.e., for each step and in total) to perform IC and participant satisfaction were compared between catheters using non-parametric statistics, i.e., Wilcoxon rank sign tests. Results are presented as median with interquartile range. Results and limitations: Participants using HPCs spent less time to prepare a catheter [15 s (10-20) vs. 41 (20-69), p=0.002] and overall to perform IC [283 s (242-352) vs. 373 (249-441), p=0.01] compared to non-HPCs. Moreover, participants rated the preparation of HPCs to be easier [5 (4-5) vs. 4 (2-4), p=0.047] compared to non-HPCs. The key limitation of this pilot study was the sample size. Conclusions: Preparation and usage of HPCs for IC is easier and faster compared to non-HPCs. IC can be a significant temporal burden for SCI individuals. Patient summary: We compared coated and uncoated catheters on time needed for intermittent catheterization and user satisfaction in individuals with spinal cord injury. Participants can manually empty their bladder quicker and easier with coated compared to uncoated catheters.
背景:间歇性导尿(IC),被认为是灵巧的脊髓损伤(SCI)患者膀胱管理的金标准,通常使用亲水性(HPC)或非亲水性(非HPC)导尿管。目前,没有证据表明使用任何一种导管与IC相关的时间负担。目的:比较两种导尿管对IC的时间要求和参与者满意度。设计、环境和参与者:20名任何脊柱节段慢性(>1年)脊髓损伤患者在10天内随机接受两次交叉评估(即从HPC或非HPC开始)。我们使用预先确定的13步集成电路协议(例如,进入浴室,洗手,转移到厕所等)测量执行集成电路所需的时间。此外,我们使用李克特量表评估了两种导管的用户满意度(即,强烈同意=5,强烈不同意=1)。结果测量和统计分析:使用非参数统计,即Wilcoxon秩号检验,比较导管执行IC的时间(即每一步和总时间)和参与者满意度。结果以四分位数范围的中位数表示。结果和局限性:与非HPCs相比,使用HPCs的参与者准备导管的时间更短[15秒(10-20)对41秒(20-69),p=0.002],总的来说,执行IC[283秒(242-352)对373 (249-441),p=0.01]。此外,参与者认为与非HPCs相比,HPCs的制备更容易[5 (4-5)vs. 4 (2-4), p=0.047]。本初步研究的主要限制是样本量。结论:与非HPCs相比,HPCs用于IC的制备和使用更容易、更快。对于脊髓损伤患者来说,IC可能是一个重大的时间负担。患者总结:我们比较了脊髓损伤患者间歇置管所需时间和用户满意度的涂膜导管和未涂膜导管。与未涂覆导尿管相比,涂覆导尿管的参与者可以更快、更容易地手动排空膀胱。
{"title":"Time needed to perform intermittent catheterization in adults with spinal cord injury: A pilot randomized controlled cross-over study","authors":"K. Gopalakrishnan, Nick F. Nielsen, Andrea L. Ramirez, J. Sørensen, M. Walter, A. Krassioukov","doi":"10.1101/2021.08.16.21253936","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.16.21253936","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Intermittent catheterization (IC), considered the gold standard for bladder management for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) with sufficient dexterity, is usually performed using hydrophilic (HPC) or non-hydrophilic (non-HPC) catheters. Currently, there is no evidence on the temporal burden associated with IC with either catheter. Objective: To compare both catheters regarding their time requirement for IC and participant satisfaction. Design, setting and participants: Twenty individuals with chronic (>1-year) SCI at any spinal segment were randomized to undergo two cross-over assessments within 10 days (i.e., either starting with HPC or non-HPC). We measured time taken to perform IC using a 13 step pre-determined IC protocol (e.g., enter bathroom, wash hands, transfer to toilet, etc.). Furthermore, we assessed user satisfaction of both catheters using a Likert scale (i.e., strongly agree=5, strongly disagree=1). Outcome measures and statistical analysis: Time (i.e., for each step and in total) to perform IC and participant satisfaction were compared between catheters using non-parametric statistics, i.e., Wilcoxon rank sign tests. Results are presented as median with interquartile range. Results and limitations: Participants using HPCs spent less time to prepare a catheter [15 s (10-20) vs. 41 (20-69), p=0.002] and overall to perform IC [283 s (242-352) vs. 373 (249-441), p=0.01] compared to non-HPCs. Moreover, participants rated the preparation of HPCs to be easier [5 (4-5) vs. 4 (2-4), p=0.047] compared to non-HPCs. The key limitation of this pilot study was the sample size. Conclusions: Preparation and usage of HPCs for IC is easier and faster compared to non-HPCs. IC can be a significant temporal burden for SCI individuals. Patient summary: We compared coated and uncoated catheters on time needed for intermittent catheterization and user satisfaction in individuals with spinal cord injury. Participants can manually empty their bladder quicker and easier with coated compared to uncoated catheters.","PeriodicalId":100330,"journal":{"name":"Continence Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84863183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
期刊
Continence Reports
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1