Pub Date : 2022-09-01DOI: 10.1016/j.contre.2022.100014
Samia Aijaz, Novera Chughtai, Urooj Kashif, Summera Malik
Background:
Leiomyoma is a benign fibromuscular neoplasm originating from smooth muscle cells. Paraurethral leiomyoma is an extremely rare, benign, hormone-dependent growth from the mesenchymal cells in paraurethral space of female urethra. They usually appear in the reproductive age group women, mean age of presentation being approximately 41 years.
Case presentation:
A 22-year-old woman presented with palpable mass at vagina and weak urinary stream. She underwent clinical examination and MRI imaging followed by transvaginal excision of the mass. Histopathological examination confirmed paraurethral leiomyoma.
Conclusion:
Paraurethral leiomyoma make up approximately five percent of urethral tumors. This case depicts the presentation and treatment of a paraurethral leiomyoma in one of the youngest women reported in the literature.
{"title":"Paraurethral leiomyoma in a 22-year-old woman: A case report","authors":"Samia Aijaz, Novera Chughtai, Urooj Kashif, Summera Malik","doi":"10.1016/j.contre.2022.100014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.contre.2022.100014","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background:</h3><p>Leiomyoma is a benign fibromuscular neoplasm originating from smooth muscle cells. Paraurethral leiomyoma is an extremely rare, benign, hormone-dependent growth from the mesenchymal cells in paraurethral space of female urethra. They usually appear in the reproductive age group women, mean age of presentation being approximately 41 years.</p></div><div><h3>Case presentation:</h3><p>A 22-year-old woman presented with palpable mass at vagina and weak urinary stream. She underwent clinical examination and MRI imaging followed by transvaginal excision of the mass. Histopathological examination confirmed paraurethral leiomyoma.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>Paraurethral leiomyoma make up approximately five percent of urethral tumors. This case depicts the presentation and treatment of a paraurethral leiomyoma in one of the youngest women reported in the literature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100330,"journal":{"name":"Continence Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772974522000084/pdfft?md5=3148ca495710e6a7fa6e4a6fa7ccd488&pid=1-s2.0-S2772974522000084-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82867650","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-06-01DOI: 10.1016/j.contre.2022.100010
Karthik Gopalakrishnan , Nick Fabrin Nielsen , Andrea L. Ramirez , Jeppe Sørensen , Matthias Walter , Andrei V. Krassioukov
Introduction:
Intermittent catheterization (IC), considered the gold standard for bladder management for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) with sufficient dexterity, is usually performed using hydrophilic (HPC) or non-hydrophilic catheters (non-HPC). Currently, there is little evidence on the temporal burden associated with IC in general. Our objective was to compare both catheters regarding their time requirement for IC and participant satisfaction.
Materials and Methods:
Twenty individuals with chronic (>1-year) SCI were randomized to undergo two cross-over assessments within 10 days (i.e., either starting with HPC or non-HPC). We measured the time taken to perform IC using a 13 step pre-determined protocol. Furthermore, we assessed user satisfaction of both catheters using a Likert scale. Time to perform IC and participant satisfaction were compared using non-parametric statistics. Results are presented as median with lower and upper quartiles.
Results:
Participants using an HPC spent significantly less time overall to perform IC [283 s (242; 352) vs. 373 s (249; 441), ] and to prepare a catheter [15 s (10; 20) vs. 41 (20; 69), , i.e. adjusted for multiple comparisons] compared to non-HPC. No significant differences between both catheters were found with respect to participant satisfaction.
Conclusions:
This crossover RCT revealed that the overall time to perform IC appears to be a significant temporal burden for individuals with SCI independent of the catheter type. Further, we found that the preparation and usage of HPC for IC is faster compared to non-HPC. These findings warrant a larger trial to further assess the temporal burden of IC in this cohort.
导论:间歇性导尿(IC),被认为是灵巧度足够的脊髓损伤(SCI)患者膀胱管理的金标准,通常使用亲水性(HPC)或非亲水性导尿(非HPC)。目前,很少有证据表明与一般IC相关的时间负担。我们的目的是比较两种导管对IC的时间要求和参与者满意度。材料与方法:20例慢性(1年)脊髓损伤患者随机在10天内进行两次交叉评估(即从HPC或非HPC开始)。我们使用预先确定的13步协议测量执行IC所需的时间。此外,我们使用李克特量表评估两种导管的用户满意度。使用非参数统计比较执行IC的时间和参与者满意度。结果以上下四分位数的中位数表示。结果:使用HPC的参与者在执行IC的总体时间上显著缩短[283 s (242;352) vs. 373 s (249;441), p=0.01],准备导管[15 s (10;20) vs. 41 (20;69), p=0.002,即调整多重比较]与非hpc相比。两种导管在受试者满意度方面无显著差异。结论:这项交叉随机对照试验显示,对脊髓损伤患者来说,执行IC的总时间似乎是一个重要的时间负担,与导管类型无关。此外,我们发现HPC在集成电路中的制备和使用速度比非HPC更快。这些发现支持更大规模的试验,以进一步评估该队列中IC的时间负担。
{"title":"Time needed to perform intermittent catheterization in adults with spinal cord injury: A pilot randomized controlled cross-over trial","authors":"Karthik Gopalakrishnan , Nick Fabrin Nielsen , Andrea L. Ramirez , Jeppe Sørensen , Matthias Walter , Andrei V. Krassioukov","doi":"10.1016/j.contre.2022.100010","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contre.2022.100010","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction:</h3><p>Intermittent catheterization (IC), considered the gold standard for bladder management for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) with sufficient dexterity, is usually performed using hydrophilic (HPC) or non-hydrophilic catheters (non-HPC). Currently, there is little evidence on the temporal burden associated with IC in general. Our objective was to compare both catheters regarding their time requirement for IC and participant satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods:</h3><p>Twenty individuals with chronic (>1-year) SCI were randomized to undergo two cross-over assessments within 10 days (i.e., either starting with HPC or non-HPC). We measured the time taken to perform IC using a 13 step pre-determined protocol. Furthermore, we assessed user satisfaction of both catheters using a Likert scale. Time to perform IC and participant satisfaction were compared using non-parametric statistics. Results are presented as median with lower and upper quartiles.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>Participants using an HPC spent significantly less time overall to perform IC [283 s (242; 352) vs. 373 s (249; 441), <span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>01</mn></mrow></math></span>] and to prepare a catheter [15 s (10; 20) vs. 41 (20; 69), <span><math><mrow><mi>p</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0</mn><mo>.</mo><mn>002</mn></mrow></math></span>, i.e. adjusted for multiple comparisons] compared to non-HPC. No significant differences between both catheters were found with respect to participant satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions:</h3><p>This crossover RCT revealed that the overall time to perform IC appears to be a significant temporal burden for individuals with SCI independent of the catheter type. Further, we found that the preparation and usage of HPC for IC is faster compared to non-HPC. These findings warrant a larger trial to further assess the temporal burden of IC in this cohort.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100330,"journal":{"name":"Continence Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772974522000060/pdfft?md5=ca05d1e28503710ac0c471ea98f5df07&pid=1-s2.0-S2772974522000060-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"137156006","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
An unpleasant, inappropriate, and persistent need to urinate (PNU) is a sensory symptom reported by some patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). However, no detailed definition of this symptom exists. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of patients reporting PNU and to discuss the pathophysiology and therapeutic approach.
Methods:
The clinical and urodynamic findings of patients presenting with PNU without chronic bladder pain syndrome or neurological or urological conditions between October 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The treatment efficacy was self-reported at follow-up as “total cure”, “significant improvement” or “no modification”.
Results:
Seventy-nine patients were included (51 women (65%), mean age 49 years (Standard Deviation (SD) 18)). The mean duration of symptoms was 7 years (SD 11). Frequency was commonly associated with PNU (mean interval between voids 103 min (SD 69)) and 50 patients (63%) reported nocturia. Voiding difficulties were described in 33 cases (40%). The mean first desire to void was 112mL (SD 93) with normal maximum cystometric capacity of 397mL (SD 135), and 5 patients had detrusor overactivity. Proposed treatments were tibial nerve stimulation (n=25) with a total cure or significant improvement in 17 cases, alpha-blockers (n=8) with an improvement in 4 patients, antimuscarinics (n=29) with an improvement in only 3 patients, and antidepressant or antiepileptic (n=8) with an improvement in 5 patients.
Conclusion:
PNU is poorly described but could be responsible for LUTS. Further studies to understand the underlying mechanisms and to assess the therapeutic efficacy of the different options are required.
{"title":"Persistent need to urinate: A common sensory symptom leading to urinary discomfort. A study of 79 cases","authors":"Claire Hentzen , Jalesh N. Panicker , Martina Pericolini , Enrico Finazzi Agrò , Camille Chesnel , Emilie Blouet , Frederique Le Breton , Samer Sheikh Ismaël , Rebecca Haddad , Gerard Amarenco","doi":"10.1016/j.contre.2022.100007","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.contre.2022.100007","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims:</h3><p>An unpleasant, inappropriate, and persistent need to urinate (PNU) is a sensory symptom reported by some patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). However, no detailed definition of this symptom exists. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of patients reporting PNU and to discuss the pathophysiology and therapeutic approach.</p></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><p>The clinical and urodynamic findings of patients presenting with PNU without chronic bladder pain syndrome or neurological or urological conditions between October 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The treatment efficacy was self-reported at follow-up as “total cure”, “significant improvement” or “no modification”.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>Seventy-nine patients were included (51 women (65%), mean age 49 years (Standard Deviation (SD) 18)). The mean duration of symptoms was 7 years (SD 11). Frequency was commonly associated with PNU (mean interval between voids 103 min (SD 69)) and 50 patients (63%) reported nocturia. Voiding difficulties were described in 33 cases (40%). The mean first desire to void was 112mL (SD 93) with normal maximum cystometric capacity of 397mL (SD 135), and 5 patients had detrusor overactivity. Proposed treatments were tibial nerve stimulation (n=25) with a total cure or significant improvement in 17 cases, alpha-blockers (n=8) with an improvement in 4 patients, antimuscarinics (n=29) with an improvement in only 3 patients, and antidepressant or antiepileptic (n=8) with an improvement in 5 patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>PNU is poorly described but could be responsible for LUTS. Further studies to understand the underlying mechanisms and to assess the therapeutic efficacy of the different options are required.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100330,"journal":{"name":"Continence Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772974522000047/pdfft?md5=718c703a6e14cf0cab595cdebccc74b8&pid=1-s2.0-S2772974522000047-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85941046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-03-01DOI: 10.1016/j.contre.2022.100004
T. Van den Broeck , B. Crul , J.P. Heesakkers
We present a case of a man who developed a neurogenic detrusor acontractility because of too much Vitamin B6 or pyridoxine intake. He developed voiding dysfunction and sensory neuropathy in both legs (numbness). The analysis gave no other explanation for the development of his complaints than the intake of excessive multivitamins, resulting in a supraphysiologic vitamin B6 level associated with neurotoxicity. Multivitamins are not only regarded as healthy but may also cause severe physical complaints, including voiding LUTS. Caretakers should bear that in mind when they encounter patients with voiding difficulties.
{"title":"Neurogenic voiding dysfunction induced by vitamin B6 overdose","authors":"T. Van den Broeck , B. Crul , J.P. Heesakkers","doi":"10.1016/j.contre.2022.100004","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.contre.2022.100004","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We present a case of a man who developed a neurogenic detrusor acontractility because of too much Vitamin B6 or pyridoxine intake. He developed voiding dysfunction and sensory neuropathy in both legs (numbness). The analysis gave no other explanation for the development of his complaints than the intake of excessive multivitamins, resulting in a supraphysiologic vitamin B6 level associated with neurotoxicity. Multivitamins are not only regarded as healthy but may also cause severe physical complaints, including voiding LUTS. Caretakers should bear that in mind when they encounter patients with voiding difficulties.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100330,"journal":{"name":"Continence Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772974522000023/pdfft?md5=1b22c76ba2f9c710c94d9af7dd486c3b&pid=1-s2.0-S2772974522000023-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82477608","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vaccine-related adverse events have been increasingly reported as the COVID-19 vaccination campaign progresses worldwide. Urological symptoms after COVID-19 vaccination are reported rarely. Herein, we report a case of urinary retention following the second dose of Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine injection.
{"title":"Underactive and low compliance bladder: A possible Presentation of COVID-19 vaccination","authors":"Hanieh Salehi-Pourmehr , Nooriyeh Dalir Akbari , Sakineh Hajebrahimi , Siamak Salehi","doi":"10.1016/j.contre.2022.100002","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.contre.2022.100002","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Vaccine-related adverse events have been increasingly reported as the COVID-19 vaccination campaign progresses worldwide. Urological symptoms after COVID-19 vaccination are reported rarely. Herein, we report a case of urinary retention following the second dose of Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine injection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100330,"journal":{"name":"Continence Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772974522000011/pdfft?md5=6949e3f725e443b832ad6b4ae5e32774&pid=1-s2.0-S2772974522000011-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77219665","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2021-08-18DOI: 10.1101/2021.08.16.21253936
K. Gopalakrishnan, Nick F. Nielsen, Andrea L. Ramirez, J. Sørensen, M. Walter, A. Krassioukov
Background: Intermittent catheterization (IC), considered the gold standard for bladder management for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) with sufficient dexterity, is usually performed using hydrophilic (HPC) or non-hydrophilic (non-HPC) catheters. Currently, there is no evidence on the temporal burden associated with IC with either catheter. Objective: To compare both catheters regarding their time requirement for IC and participant satisfaction. Design, setting and participants: Twenty individuals with chronic (>1-year) SCI at any spinal segment were randomized to undergo two cross-over assessments within 10 days (i.e., either starting with HPC or non-HPC). We measured time taken to perform IC using a 13 step pre-determined IC protocol (e.g., enter bathroom, wash hands, transfer to toilet, etc.). Furthermore, we assessed user satisfaction of both catheters using a Likert scale (i.e., strongly agree=5, strongly disagree=1). Outcome measures and statistical analysis: Time (i.e., for each step and in total) to perform IC and participant satisfaction were compared between catheters using non-parametric statistics, i.e., Wilcoxon rank sign tests. Results are presented as median with interquartile range. Results and limitations: Participants using HPCs spent less time to prepare a catheter [15 s (10-20) vs. 41 (20-69), p=0.002] and overall to perform IC [283 s (242-352) vs. 373 (249-441), p=0.01] compared to non-HPCs. Moreover, participants rated the preparation of HPCs to be easier [5 (4-5) vs. 4 (2-4), p=0.047] compared to non-HPCs. The key limitation of this pilot study was the sample size. Conclusions: Preparation and usage of HPCs for IC is easier and faster compared to non-HPCs. IC can be a significant temporal burden for SCI individuals. Patient summary: We compared coated and uncoated catheters on time needed for intermittent catheterization and user satisfaction in individuals with spinal cord injury. Participants can manually empty their bladder quicker and easier with coated compared to uncoated catheters.
{"title":"Time needed to perform intermittent catheterization in adults with spinal cord injury: A pilot randomized controlled cross-over study","authors":"K. Gopalakrishnan, Nick F. Nielsen, Andrea L. Ramirez, J. Sørensen, M. Walter, A. Krassioukov","doi":"10.1101/2021.08.16.21253936","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.16.21253936","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Intermittent catheterization (IC), considered the gold standard for bladder management for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) with sufficient dexterity, is usually performed using hydrophilic (HPC) or non-hydrophilic (non-HPC) catheters. Currently, there is no evidence on the temporal burden associated with IC with either catheter. Objective: To compare both catheters regarding their time requirement for IC and participant satisfaction. Design, setting and participants: Twenty individuals with chronic (>1-year) SCI at any spinal segment were randomized to undergo two cross-over assessments within 10 days (i.e., either starting with HPC or non-HPC). We measured time taken to perform IC using a 13 step pre-determined IC protocol (e.g., enter bathroom, wash hands, transfer to toilet, etc.). Furthermore, we assessed user satisfaction of both catheters using a Likert scale (i.e., strongly agree=5, strongly disagree=1). Outcome measures and statistical analysis: Time (i.e., for each step and in total) to perform IC and participant satisfaction were compared between catheters using non-parametric statistics, i.e., Wilcoxon rank sign tests. Results are presented as median with interquartile range. Results and limitations: Participants using HPCs spent less time to prepare a catheter [15 s (10-20) vs. 41 (20-69), p=0.002] and overall to perform IC [283 s (242-352) vs. 373 (249-441), p=0.01] compared to non-HPCs. Moreover, participants rated the preparation of HPCs to be easier [5 (4-5) vs. 4 (2-4), p=0.047] compared to non-HPCs. The key limitation of this pilot study was the sample size. Conclusions: Preparation and usage of HPCs for IC is easier and faster compared to non-HPCs. IC can be a significant temporal burden for SCI individuals. Patient summary: We compared coated and uncoated catheters on time needed for intermittent catheterization and user satisfaction in individuals with spinal cord injury. Participants can manually empty their bladder quicker and easier with coated compared to uncoated catheters.","PeriodicalId":100330,"journal":{"name":"Continence Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84863183","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}