首页 > 最新文献

Gynaecological Endoscopy最新文献

英文 中文
Bowel injuries during gynaecological laparoscopy: a multinational survey 妇科腹腔镜手术中肠损伤:一项跨国调查
Pub Date : 2008-06-28 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00432.x
Ivo Brosens, Alan Gordon

Objective

To use the experience of an international group of gynaecological laparoscopists to evaluate the prevalence, causes, sites, management and outcomes of bowel injury occurring during or as a result of laparoscopy.

Design

A questionnaire was sent to members of the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE) requesting details of all laparoscopies complicated by bowel trauma and performed by them over a 2-year period. One year was retrospective and one prospective.

Results

A total of 135 members (24%) replied and reported 45 bowel injuries. The estimated prevalence was 1 in 1652 level 1 laparoscopies and 1 in 280 levels 2 and 3 laparoscopies combined. Injuries were caused by the Veress needle, primary trocar, forceps, scissors and by electro- and laser surgery. Adhesions from previous surgery or endometriosis were present in 78% of cases. Bowel trauma was statistically significantly related to the experience of the surgeon, defined by a cut-off at 100 procedures per year. In experienced hands trauma occurred as frequently during access as during the surgical procedure. The diagnosis was made during the laparoscopy in 38 cases. Expectant treatment was carried out in four cases after Veress needle injury without consequences, laparoscopic suturing in eight cases and conversion to laparotomy in 26 cases. The diagnosis was delayed in seven patients (15%) of whom two (28%) died 7 days after surgery without any further intervention.

Conclusions

Bowel injury during gynaecological laparoscopy is significantly related to the experience of the surgeon. With the experienced group, bowel trauma occurs as frequently during access as during the surgical procedure. The occurrence of two deaths in our study suggests that the mortality due to bowel trauma may be underestimated in reports from highly privileged societies.

目的利用国际妇科腹腔镜专家小组的经验,评估腹腔镜手术中或术后肠损伤的发生率、原因、部位、处理和结局。设计向国际妇科内窥镜学会(ISGE)的成员发送了一份调查问卷,询问他们在2年内进行的所有并发肠外伤的腹腔镜检查的详细情况。一年是回顾性研究,一年是前瞻性研究。结果135名会员(24%)回复并报告45例肠损伤。估计患病率为1652例1级腹腔镜患者中有1例,280例2级和3级腹腔镜患者中有1例。损伤是由Veress针、主套管针、钳子、剪刀和电、激光手术引起的。78%的病例存在先前手术或子宫内膜异位症引起的粘连。肠道创伤在统计上与外科医生的经验显著相关,以每年100例手术为限。经验丰富的手部外伤在手术过程中发生的频率一样高。38例经腹腔镜诊断。Veress针伤后进行保守治疗4例,无不良后果,腹腔镜缝合8例,中转开腹26例。7名患者(15%)的诊断被延迟,其中2名(28%)在手术后7天死亡,没有任何进一步的干预。结论妇科腹腔镜手术中肠损伤与手术经验密切相关。在有经验的人群中,肠外伤发生的频率与手术过程中一样高。本研究中两例死亡的发生表明,在高度特权社会的报告中,肠外伤的死亡率可能被低估了。
{"title":"Bowel injuries during gynaecological laparoscopy: a multinational survey","authors":"Ivo Brosens,&nbsp;Alan Gordon","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00432.x","DOIUrl":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00432.x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Objective</p><p>To use the experience of an international group of gynaecological laparoscopists to evaluate the prevalence, causes, sites, management and outcomes of bowel injury occurring during or as a result of laparoscopy.</p><p>Design</p><p>A questionnaire was sent to members of the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE) requesting details of all laparoscopies complicated by bowel trauma and performed by them over a 2-year period. One year was retrospective and one prospective.</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 135 members (24%) replied and reported 45 bowel injuries. The estimated prevalence was 1 in 1652 level 1 laparoscopies and 1 in 280 levels 2 and 3 laparoscopies combined. Injuries were caused by the Veress needle, primary trocar, forceps, scissors and by electro- and laser surgery. Adhesions from previous surgery or endometriosis were present in 78% of cases. Bowel trauma was statistically significantly related to the experience of the surgeon, defined by a cut-off at 100 procedures per year. In experienced hands trauma occurred as frequently during access as during the surgical procedure. The diagnosis was made during the laparoscopy in 38 cases. Expectant treatment was carried out in four cases after Veress needle injury without consequences, laparoscopic suturing in eight cases and conversion to laparotomy in 26 cases. The diagnosis was delayed in seven patients (15%) of whom two (28%) died 7 days after surgery without any further intervention.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Bowel injury during gynaecological laparoscopy is significantly related to the experience of the surgeon. With the experienced group, bowel trauma occurs as frequently during access as during the surgical procedure. The occurrence of two deaths in our study suggests that the mortality due to bowel trauma may be underestimated in reports from highly privileged societies.</p>","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"10 3","pages":"141-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00432.x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84759688","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49
Comment on: Who is for endoscopic surgery and whom is endoscopic surgery for? (Garry R., Gynaecological Endoscopy 2000; 9: 281–3) 点评:谁应该做内窥镜手术,谁应该做内窥镜手术?(Garry R.,妇科内窥镜2000;9: 281 - 3)
Pub Date : 2008-06-28 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00441-4.x
Glyn Constantine
{"title":"Comment on: Who is for endoscopic surgery and whom is endoscopic surgery for? (Garry R., Gynaecological Endoscopy 2000; 9: 281–3)","authors":"Glyn Constantine","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00441-4.x","DOIUrl":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00441-4.x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"10 5-6","pages":"380-381"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00441-4.x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78021784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rectosigmoid integrity after excision of nodular endometriotic disease: do we test appropriately? 结节性子宫内膜异位症切除后直肠乙状结肠的完整性:我们是否应该进行适当的检查?
Pub Date : 2008-06-28 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00433.x
Simon J. Gordon, Peter J. Maher, Martin Healey

Objective

To highlight the necessity of adequately testing rectosigmoid integrity after resection of infiltrating endometriosis.

Subject

A 25-year-old woman with a past history of ablative treatment for endometriosis, symptoms suggestive of disease progression, and a palpable anterior rectal nodule.

Interventions and outcomes

Excisional treatment of all visible disease, including the rectal nodule was carried out. Rectal integrity was confirmed intraoperatively via the ‘Betadine’ test. The patient presented again 3 days later with clinical findings suggestive of a bowel perforation. Repair of the defect and a de-functioning colostomy were performed.

Conclusion

Although clinical bowel perforation is an uncommon event, the sequelae have far-reaching consequences for the patient's quality of life. The use of electrosurgical dissection may have contributed to delayed tissue necrosis and the subsequent rectal perforation. Current methods for testing colorectal integrity are reviewed.

目的探讨浸润性子宫内膜异位症术后直肠乙状结肠完整性检查的必要性。受试者:25岁女性,既往有子宫内膜异位症的消融治疗史,症状提示疾病进展,直肠前结节可触及。干预措施和结果对包括直肠结节在内的所有可见疾病进行了切除治疗。术中通过“倍他定”试验确认直肠完整性。患者3天后再次出现,临床表现提示肠穿孔。进行了缺损修复和功能性结肠造口术。结论临床肠穿孔虽不常见,但其后遗症对患者的生活质量影响深远。电外科解剖的使用可能导致延迟的组织坏死和随后的直肠穿孔。综述了目前检测结肠直肠完整性的方法。
{"title":"Rectosigmoid integrity after excision of nodular endometriotic disease: do we test appropriately?","authors":"Simon J. Gordon,&nbsp;Peter J. Maher,&nbsp;Martin Healey","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00433.x","DOIUrl":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00433.x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Objective</p><p>To highlight the necessity of adequately testing rectosigmoid integrity after resection of infiltrating endometriosis.</p><p>Subject</p><p>A 25-year-old woman with a past history of ablative treatment for endometriosis, symptoms suggestive of disease progression, and a palpable anterior rectal nodule.</p><p>Interventions and outcomes</p><p>Excisional treatment of all visible disease, including the rectal nodule was carried out. Rectal integrity was confirmed intraoperatively via the ‘Betadine’ test. The patient presented again 3 days later with clinical findings suggestive of a bowel perforation. Repair of the defect and a de-functioning colostomy were performed.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>Although clinical bowel perforation is an uncommon event, the sequelae have far-reaching consequences for the patient's quality of life. The use of electrosurgical dissection may have contributed to delayed tissue necrosis and the subsequent rectal perforation. Current methods for testing colorectal integrity are reviewed.</p>","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"10 3","pages":"147-149"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00433.x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85018361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Forthcoming Events 即将到来的事件
Pub Date : 2008-06-28 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.10_3forth.x
{"title":"Forthcoming Events","authors":"","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.10_3forth.x","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.10_3forth.x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"10 3","pages":"199-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.10_3forth.x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"109177875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing vaginal and coelioscopic total or subtotal hysterectomies: prospective multicentre study including 82 patients 阴道和腹腔镜下全子宫或次全子宫切除术的比较:包括82例患者的前瞻性多中心研究
Pub Date : 2008-06-28 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00472.x
Nathalie Jugnet, Michel Cosson, Armand Wattiez, Jacques Donnez, Valerie Buick, Gerard Mage, Demis Querleu

Three surgical units were involved in a prospective comparative study: the Pavillon Paul Gellé in Roubaix, France for vaginal hysterectomies; the Hôtel Dieu Polyclinic in Clermont-Ferrand, France for total percoelioscopic hysterectomies; and the Saint-Luc Clinic in Brussels, Belgium for subtotal percoelioscopic hysterectomies.

The inclusion criteria were age (38–55 years old), the patients were either not menopausal or else they had received alternative therapies for menopause, and had mild uterine pathology with or without castration signs, but without pelvic pain. The vaginal or coelioscopic approach had to be practicable. Those patients with psychiatric histories, or with prolapses or stress incontinence which demanded surgery were excluded. Contraindications to any of the approaches (uterine volume larger than umbilicus, major previous pelvic surgery, severe endometriosis and virginity) were also considered to be exclusion criteria. A total of 82 patients who had undergone 31 vaginal hysterectomies, 31 total coelioscopic hysterectomies and 20 subtotal coelioscopic hysterectomies were followed up 1 year after the operation.

The population characteristics in the three groups were similar. Operating times were 70.8 min for vaginal hysterectomies (VH), 67.6 min for total percoelioscopic hysterectomies (TPCH) and 111.5 min for subtotal percoelioscopic hysterectomies (SPCH). The mean hospital stay was comparable in the three groups. The mean uterine weight was 225 g for the VH group, 281 g for the TPCH and 206.5 g for the SPCH group (P was not significant). The pain evaluation scales used by the patients during their hospital stay did not show any significant difference between the three groups. The mean times before patients could walk, return to work or resume sexual intercourse showed no significant differences between the groups. Mild urinary signs were reported in the mid-term without any significant difference. Physical activity improved in 38.7% of the patients who had undergone VH, in 46.6% who had undergone TPCH and in 60% who had undergone SPCH (P not significant). Those patients who had undergone SPCH resumed satisfactory sexual intercourse significantly earlier (P = 0.0002). Intercourse was not significantly modified in the three groups. Quality of life was generally and significantly improved for 80.6%, 96.5% and 70%, respectively, of the patients in the VH, TPCH and SPCH groups.

Although some surgical teams are still reluctant to practise coelioscopic hysterectomies, all three hysterectomy types were finally demonstrated to be equivalent in this study. They were proved to be feasible even in patients with a large uterus. Operating times are no longer unfavourable factors when coelioscopies are performed by highly skilled surgeons.

三个外科单位参与了一项前瞻性比较研究:法国鲁贝的Pavillon Paul gell阴道子宫切除术;法国Clermont-Ferrand的Hôtel Dieu Polyclinic进行全腔镜子宫切除术;比利时布鲁塞尔的Saint-Luc诊所进行子宫次全腔镜切除术。纳入标准为年龄(38-55岁),未绝经或接受过更年期替代治疗,有轻度子宫病理伴或不伴去势体征,但无盆腔疼痛。阴道或腹腔镜入路必须可行。那些有精神病史,或有脱垂或压力性尿失禁需要手术的患者被排除在外。任何入路的禁忌症(子宫体积大于脐部,既往盆腔手术,严重子宫内膜异位症和童贞)也被认为是排除标准。82例经阴道子宫切除术31例,全腔镜子宫切除术31例,次全腔镜子宫切除术20例,术后随访1年。三组人群特征相似。阴道子宫切除术(VH)的手术时间为70.8 min,全腔镜子宫切除术(TPCH)的手术时间为67.6 min,次全腔镜子宫切除术(SPCH)的手术时间为111.5 min。三组的平均住院时间具有可比性。VH组平均子宫重量为225 g, TPCH组为281 g, SPCH组为206.5 g (P无统计学意义)。患者在住院期间使用的疼痛评估量表在三组间无显著差异。患者能够行走、恢复工作或恢复性生活的平均时间在两组之间没有显著差异。中期出现轻度尿路体征,差异无统计学意义。VH组38.7%、TPCH组46.6%、SPCH组60%的患者体力活动改善(P无统计学意义)。行SPCH者性生活恢复满意的时间明显早于行SPCH者(P = 0.0002)。三组的性交没有明显改变。VH组、TPCH组和SPCH组患者的生活质量分别有80.6%、96.5%和70%的患者普遍改善和显著改善。尽管一些外科团队仍然不愿意进行腔镜子宫切除术,但在本研究中,所有三种子宫切除术类型最终被证明是等效的。它们被证明是可行的,甚至在患者的大子宫。手术时间不再是不利因素,当肠镜检查是由高度熟练的外科医生进行。
{"title":"Comparing vaginal and coelioscopic total or subtotal hysterectomies: prospective multicentre study including 82 patients","authors":"Nathalie Jugnet,&nbsp;Michel Cosson,&nbsp;Armand Wattiez,&nbsp;Jacques Donnez,&nbsp;Valerie Buick,&nbsp;Gerard Mage,&nbsp;Demis Querleu","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00472.x","DOIUrl":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00472.x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Three surgical units were involved in a prospective comparative study: the Pavillon Paul Gellé in Roubaix, France for vaginal hysterectomies; the Hôtel Dieu Polyclinic in Clermont-Ferrand, France for total percoelioscopic hysterectomies; and the Saint-Luc Clinic in Brussels, Belgium for subtotal percoelioscopic hysterectomies.</p><p>The inclusion criteria were age (38–55 years old), the patients were either not menopausal or else they had received alternative therapies for menopause, and had mild uterine pathology with or without castration signs, but without pelvic pain. The vaginal or coelioscopic approach had to be practicable. Those patients with psychiatric histories, or with prolapses or stress incontinence which demanded surgery were excluded. Contraindications to any of the approaches (uterine volume larger than umbilicus, major previous pelvic surgery, severe endometriosis and virginity) were also considered to be exclusion criteria. A total of 82 patients who had undergone 31 vaginal hysterectomies, 31 total coelioscopic hysterectomies and 20 subtotal coelioscopic hysterectomies were followed up 1 year after the operation.</p><p>The population characteristics in the three groups were similar. Operating times were 70.8 min for vaginal hysterectomies (VH), 67.6 min for total percoelioscopic hysterectomies (TPCH) and 111.5 min for subtotal percoelioscopic hysterectomies (SPCH). The mean hospital stay was comparable in the three groups. The mean uterine weight was 225 g for the VH group, 281 g for the TPCH and 206.5 g for the SPCH group (<i>P</i> was not significant). The pain evaluation scales used by the patients during their hospital stay did not show any significant difference between the three groups. The mean times before patients could walk, return to work or resume sexual intercourse showed no significant differences between the groups. Mild urinary signs were reported in the mid-term without any significant difference. Physical activity improved in 38.7% of the patients who had undergone VH, in 46.6% who had undergone TPCH and in 60% who had undergone SPCH (<i>P</i> not significant). Those patients who had undergone SPCH resumed satisfactory sexual intercourse significantly earlier (<i>P</i> = 0.0002). Intercourse was not significantly modified in the three groups. Quality of life was generally and significantly improved for 80.6%, 96.5% and 70%, respectively, of the patients in the VH, TPCH and SPCH groups.</p><p>Although some surgical teams are still reluctant to practise coelioscopic hysterectomies, all three hysterectomy types were finally demonstrated to be equivalent in this study. They were proved to be feasible even in patients with a large uterus. Operating times are no longer unfavourable factors when coelioscopies are performed by highly skilled surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"10 5-6","pages":"315-321"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00472.x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91063593","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Fragmentation of a disposable trocar during laparoscopy 腹腔镜检查时一次性套管针碎裂
Pub Date : 2008-06-28 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00429.x
Michel Cosson, Jerome Hautefeuille, Denis Querleu

Objective

To report a case of breakage of the tip of a disposable trocar in the course of laparoscopic surgery, and to seek to establish the causes of the incident, analyse the incident itself, and to attempt to draw conclusions, in order to prevent recurrences.

Results

This was an generally difficult laparoscopic procedure in an obese patient, but no notable incident occurred. Towards the end of surgery, we noticed the presence of small plastic fragments and saw that the 10-mm disposable trocar was broken at its tip. Because it would be difficult to locate the small clear fragments, even if the abdomen were incised, and despite the fact that the fragments were sharp, we decided not to convert to laparotomy. We retrieved as many fragments as possible via laparoscopy. The postoperative course was completely normal.

Conclusions

The case illustrates the actual occurrence of a theoretical risk. In order to reduce the risk to a minimum, impacts between plastic trocars and metallic instruments should be avoided. Despite the lack of reaction from the manufacturers, it may be useful to raise the standard of robustness demanded for this product.

目的报告1例腹腔镜手术过程中一次性套管针针尖断裂的病例,探讨事故原因,分析事故本身,总结结论,防止再次发生。结果:在肥胖患者中,腹腔镜手术通常是困难的,但没有明显的事件发生。手术快结束时,我们注意到小塑料碎片的存在,看到10毫米的一次性套管针在尖端断裂。因为即使切开腹部也很难找到清晰的小碎片,尽管碎片很锋利,我们还是决定不进行剖腹手术。我们通过腹腔镜尽可能多地取出了碎片。术后过程完全正常。该案例说明了理论风险的实际发生。为了将风险降至最低,应避免塑料套管针与金属器械之间的碰撞。尽管制造商对此缺乏反应,但提高对该产品的坚固性要求标准可能是有用的。
{"title":"Fragmentation of a disposable trocar during laparoscopy","authors":"Michel Cosson,&nbsp;Jerome Hautefeuille,&nbsp;Denis Querleu","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00429.x","DOIUrl":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00429.x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Objective</p><p>To report a case of breakage of the tip of a disposable trocar in the course of laparoscopic surgery, and to seek to establish the causes of the incident, analyse the incident itself, and to attempt to draw conclusions, in order to prevent recurrences.</p><p>Results</p><p>This was an generally difficult laparoscopic procedure in an obese patient, but no notable incident occurred. Towards the end of surgery, we noticed the presence of small plastic fragments and saw that the 10-mm disposable trocar was broken at its tip. Because it would be difficult to locate the small clear fragments, even if the abdomen were incised, and despite the fact that the fragments were sharp, we decided not to convert to laparotomy. We retrieved as many fragments as possible via laparoscopy. The postoperative course was completely normal.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>The case illustrates the actual occurrence of a theoretical risk. In order to reduce the risk to a minimum, impacts between plastic trocars and metallic instruments should be avoided. Despite the lack of reaction from the manufacturers, it may be useful to raise the standard of robustness demanded for this product.</p>","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"10 3","pages":"197-198"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00429.x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89454903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outpatient microhysteroscopy: why does it fail? 门诊显微宫腔镜:为什么会失败?
Pub Date : 2008-06-28 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00405.x
Osama Salha, Majella Okeahialam, Siân Jones, Peter O'Donovan

Objective

To assess the failure rate of diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy using a 2.5-mm semirigid hysteroscope.

Design

Retrospective cohort analysis.

Setting

Outpatient hysteroscopy unit in a large district general hospital.

Sample

All patients who had a diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy during the study period.

Main outcome measures

Hysteroscopy was considered a failure when the uterine cavity was not accessible or when the view obtained was unsatisfactory.

Results

A total of 1976 patients were seen in the direct-access hysteroscopy unit between November 1994 and May 1999. The procedure was performed successfully in 1898 patients (96.1%) but failed in 78 patients (3.9%). Causes for failure included: cervical stenosis (n = 54; 67.9%), severe discomfort (n = 7; 8.9%), unsatisfactory view (n = 6; 2.6%), obesity (n = 5; 6.4%), large cervical polyp (n = 4; 5.1%) and vagal reaction (n = 2; 2.6%). Overall failure was more likely in postmenopausal (46/894; 5.1%) than in premenopausal patients (32/1082; 2.9%).

Conclusions

Diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy using a 2.5-mm semirigid hysteroscope is a simple, safe, effective and acceptable investigation. The most common reason for a failed outpatient microhysteroscopy was cervical stenosis particularly in postmenopausal women.

目的探讨2.5 mm半刚性宫腔镜在门诊诊断宫腔镜检查中的失败率。设计回顾性队列分析。背景:某大型区级综合医院门诊宫腔镜科室。样本:所有在研究期间接受诊断性门诊宫腔镜检查的患者。主要观察指标:子宫腔无法进入或视野不理想时,子宫镜检查失败。结果1994年11月至1999年5月在宫腔镜直接入路就诊的患者共1976例。1898例(96.1%)患者手术成功,78例(3.9%)患者手术失败。失败的原因包括:颈椎狭窄(n = 54;67.9%),严重不适(n = 7;8.9%),不满意(n = 6;2.6%)、肥胖(n = 5;6.4%),大宫颈息肉(n = 4;5.1%)和迷走神经反应(n = 2;2.6%)。绝经后患者更容易出现总体失败(46/894;5.1%)高于绝经前患者(32/1082;2.9%)。结论门诊诊断性宫腔镜采用2.5 mm半刚性宫腔镜是一种简单、安全、有效、可接受的检查方法。门诊显微宫腔镜检查失败的最常见原因是宫颈狭窄,特别是绝经后妇女。
{"title":"Outpatient microhysteroscopy: why does it fail?","authors":"Osama Salha,&nbsp;Majella Okeahialam,&nbsp;Siân Jones,&nbsp;Peter O'Donovan","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00405.x","DOIUrl":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00405.x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Objective</p><p>To assess the failure rate of diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy using a 2.5-mm semirigid hysteroscope.</p><p>Design</p><p>Retrospective cohort analysis.</p><p>Setting</p><p>Outpatient hysteroscopy unit in a large district general hospital.</p><p>Sample</p><p>All patients who had a diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy during the study period.</p><p>Main outcome measures</p><p>Hysteroscopy was considered a failure when the uterine cavity was not accessible or when the view obtained was unsatisfactory.</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 1976 patients were seen in the direct-access hysteroscopy unit between November 1994 and May 1999. The procedure was performed successfully in 1898 patients (96.1%) but failed in 78 patients (3.9%). Causes for failure included: cervical stenosis (<i>n</i> = 54; 67.9%), severe discomfort (<i>n</i> = 7; 8.9%), unsatisfactory view (<i>n</i> = 6; 2.6%), obesity (<i>n</i> = 5; 6.4%), large cervical polyp (<i>n</i> = 4; 5.1%) and vagal reaction (<i>n</i> = 2; 2.6%). Overall failure was more likely in postmenopausal (46/894; 5.1%) than in premenopausal patients (32/1082; 2.9%).</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Diagnostic outpatient hysteroscopy using a 2.5-mm semirigid hysteroscope is a simple, safe, effective and acceptable investigation. The most common reason for a failed outpatient microhysteroscopy was cervical stenosis particularly in postmenopausal women.</p>","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"10 3","pages":"167-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00405.x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90339191","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Comment on: Twin pregnancy in a rudimentary uterine horn diagnosed by ultrasound and managed laparoscopically before rupture (Morgans & Scott, Gynaecological Endoscopy 1999; 8: 293–5) 评论:双胎妊娠在子宫角的初步超声诊断和腹腔镜处理破裂前(Morgans & Scott,妇科内镜1999;8: 293 - 5)
Pub Date : 2008-06-28 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2508.2001.00439.pp.x
Katharina Anwar, Kirk A.J. Chin
{"title":"Comment on: Twin pregnancy in a rudimentary uterine horn diagnosed by ultrasound and managed laparoscopically before rupture (Morgans & Scott, Gynaecological Endoscopy 1999; 8: 293–5)","authors":"Katharina Anwar,&nbsp;Kirk A.J. Chin","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2508.2001.00439.pp.x","DOIUrl":"10.1111/j.1365-2508.2001.00439.pp.x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"10 4","pages":"273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1365-2508.2001.00439.pp.x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"89906141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Comment on: An unusual clinical and histological consequence of uterine arterial embolization of a fibroid 评论:子宫动脉栓塞子宫肌瘤的一个不寻常的临床和组织学后果
Pub Date : 2008-06-28 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2508.2001.439-3.pp.x
Jean Bernard Dubuisson, Charles Chapron
{"title":"Comment on: An unusual clinical and histological consequence of uterine arterial embolization of a fibroid","authors":"Jean Bernard Dubuisson,&nbsp;Charles Chapron","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2508.2001.439-3.pp.x","DOIUrl":"10.1111/j.1365-2508.2001.439-3.pp.x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"10 4","pages":"273-274"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1365-2508.2001.439-3.pp.x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82630567","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of ultrasound in an outpatient hysteroscopy clinic: does it alter management in premenopausal women? 超声在门诊宫腔镜诊所的评价:它会改变绝经前妇女的管理吗?
Pub Date : 2008-06-28 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00406.x
Sue Taylor, Siân Jones, Anne-Marie Dixon, Peter O'Donovan

Objective

To assess the role of ultrasound with respect to management decisions in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding attending an outpatient hysteroscopy clinic.

Design

Retrospective analysis of ultrasound and hysteroscopic findings, in 264 women referred with abnormal uterine bleeding.

Setting

Outpatient hysteroscopy clinic in a busy district general hospital.

Results

In situations where hysteroscopy findings were normal, additional information gained from a preliminary ultrasound did not affect management decisions. No malignant adnexal pathology was detected, and ultrasound assessment of the endometrium did not correlate well with either hysteroscopic or histological findings.

Conclusion

Ultrasound findings do not alter management decisions in this situation. The presence of irregular bleeding, and patients' prior expectations, are more significant determinants.

目的探讨超声在绝经前宫腔镜门诊异常子宫出血患者诊治决策中的作用。设计回顾性分析264例子宫异常出血妇女的超声和宫腔镜检查结果。地点:繁忙的区级综合医院宫腔镜门诊。结果在宫腔镜检查结果正常的情况下,从初步超声获得的额外信息不影响治疗决策。子宫内膜的超声检查与宫腔镜或组织学检查结果没有很好的相关性。结论超声检查结果不能改变这种情况下的治疗决定。不规则出血的存在和患者先前的期望是更重要的决定因素。
{"title":"Evaluation of ultrasound in an outpatient hysteroscopy clinic: does it alter management in premenopausal women?","authors":"Sue Taylor,&nbsp;Siân Jones,&nbsp;Anne-Marie Dixon,&nbsp;Peter O'Donovan","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00406.x","DOIUrl":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00406.x","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Objective</p><p>To assess the role of ultrasound with respect to management decisions in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding attending an outpatient hysteroscopy clinic.</p><p>Design</p><p>Retrospective analysis of ultrasound and hysteroscopic findings, in 264 women referred with abnormal uterine bleeding.</p><p>Setting</p><p>Outpatient hysteroscopy clinic in a busy district general hospital.</p><p>Results</p><p>In situations where hysteroscopy findings were normal, additional information gained from a preliminary ultrasound did not affect management decisions. No malignant adnexal pathology was detected, and ultrasound assessment of the endometrium did not correlate well with either hysteroscopic or histological findings.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>Ultrasound findings do not alter management decisions in this situation. The presence of irregular bleeding, and patients' prior expectations, are more significant determinants.</p>","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"10 3","pages":"173-178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00406.x","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83387727","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
期刊
Gynaecological Endoscopy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1