Globalization might justifiably be considered as today's driving force for world trade and economies, but it has also become identified with the increasingly supra-national context in which healthcare and higher education (HE) institutions are now operating. This new context represents a range of challenges that cannot be seen separately from the ones related to the developments towards a knowledge economy, the role of new technologies and developments towards global citizenship and lifelong learning. However, whilst embracing the advance of globalization, its impact on individual nations has to be balanced by a process of internationalization, in which countries adapt to this phenomenon while preserving their own individuality and respecting that of others. Nowhere is this more pertinent than in the fields of education, health and social care where the effect of globalization is increasingly dictating academic and professional requirements for graduates, and disciplines must adapt to provide adequate preparation, not only in academic and professional knowledge and skills, but also in cross-cultural skills and attitudes, without sacrificing quality and safety. We are likely to see increased expectations from funding and professional bodies that educators can show that they prepare their students well for global citizenship.
It is clear that globalization affects a great many aspects of our lives and we know that it raises many questions. If we take this to mean that the world is being moulded into a shared social space, questions regarding what we do in the design of our curricula (and research endeavours) that equips our students to responsibly occupy that space need to be raised. In health and social care education, we need to give attention to what it is that we seek from education and what we regard as an educated person, acknowledging that education is never value-free. Although internationalization concerns might appear social, cultural, humanistic and educational, they are also directly connected to globalization and the worry that a marketization ethos will lead to a lack of emphasis on teaching and learning and that academic quality will suffer.
Debates on the internationalization of HE have been prefaced by a number of underlying issues ranging from pressure on institutions to internationalize and the kinds of forces that are driving this, to a need for greater clarity or a common definition of the concept. Perhaps I need to delineate what I mean by internationalization, and here I draw on Van der Wende (1996, p. 23), ‘any systematic, sustained effort aimed at making higher education responsive to the requirements and challenges related to the globalization of societies, economy and labour markets.’ In this context, I associate globalization with competition, while internationalization is presumed to be associated with cooperation and collaboration. Internationalization applies to both a process of making something intern