Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-04-05DOI: 10.1016/j.martra.2024.100108
Shambhu Sajith , Totakura Bangar Raju , RS Aswani
Seaports are exposed to multiple risks that may affect security and operations. This research aims to develop a framework for identifying, ranking, and prioritizing the risks. Also, this study ranks the 12 major Indian ports based on the identified risk factors. The study follows an extensive literature review, prioritization by Fuzzy TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution), and sensitivity analysis for robustness. Thirty-two risks were identified and classified into five categories: natural disasters, geographical risks, security risks, operational and financial risks, and socio-political risks. The analysis suggests that the most important risk that the ports in India should consider is natural disasters. The risk of cyclones and tsunamis occupied the first two ranks among the global risks. Operational and financial risks, such as complex and lengthy approval procedures and infrastructure risks, are ranked third and fourth. Mumbai is ranked first as the riskiest Indian port, followed by Kolkata, JNPT (Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust), and Vishakapatnam Port
{"title":"Are Indian ports safe? Identifying, analysing and prioritizing the risks affecting India's major ports","authors":"Shambhu Sajith , Totakura Bangar Raju , RS Aswani","doi":"10.1016/j.martra.2024.100108","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2024.100108","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Seaports are exposed to multiple risks that may affect security and operations. This research aims to develop a framework for identifying, ranking, and prioritizing the risks. Also, this study ranks the 12 major Indian ports based on the identified risk factors. The study follows an extensive literature review, prioritization by Fuzzy TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution), and sensitivity analysis for robustness. Thirty-two risks were identified and classified into five categories: natural disasters, geographical risks, security risks, operational and financial risks, and socio-political risks. The analysis suggests that the most important risk that the ports in India should consider is natural disasters. The risk of cyclones and tsunamis occupied the first two ranks among the global risks. Operational and financial risks, such as complex and lengthy approval procedures and infrastructure risks, are ranked third and fourth. Mumbai is ranked first as the riskiest Indian port, followed by Kolkata, JNPT (Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust), and Vishakapatnam Port</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100885,"journal":{"name":"Maritime Transport Research","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666822X24000066/pdfft?md5=71c7f0af12dbf36caabf071b91cb1eb2&pid=1-s2.0-S2666822X24000066-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140347067","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-05-20DOI: 10.1016/j.martra.2024.100112
Tore Longva, Magnus S. Eide, Øyvind Endresen, Øyvind Sekkesæter, Henrik Helgesen, Nikolai Hydle Rivedal
The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has stated an ambition to achieve net-zero GHG emissions by 2050 and new regulations are under development to achieve this. To inform decisions on GHG regulations, this study has modeled the CO2 emission abatement potentials and costs towards 2050 for all ships above 400 gross tons. We explore CO2 reduction pathways based on marginal abatement cost curves (MACC) for 2030, 2040 and 2050. MACC is an important tool to assess the potential impact of regulations and can inform current policy debates as well as ship owners that need to develop their decarbonization strategies. Compared to previous work, we provide global MACCs taking into account the latest technologies and cost development, including alternative fuels. The updated MACC is based on more than 50 state-of-the-art abatement measures, 10 fuel systems and 8 fuels. The results indicate that the revised IMO GHG strategy ambition of 20–30 % GHG emission reduction in 2030, relative to 2008, can be reached at a marginal cost of 50–100 USD/tCO2; 70–80 % emission reduction in 2040 can be achieved at 230–240 USD/tCO2 and net-zero emissions in 2050 at a marginal cost of 300 USD/tCO2. The two inputs which have the highest impact on the results are the future cost of carbon-neutral fuels and growth in seaborne trade.
{"title":"Marginal abatement cost curves for CO2 emission reduction from shipping to 2050","authors":"Tore Longva, Magnus S. Eide, Øyvind Endresen, Øyvind Sekkesæter, Henrik Helgesen, Nikolai Hydle Rivedal","doi":"10.1016/j.martra.2024.100112","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2024.100112","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has stated an ambition to achieve net-zero GHG emissions by 2050 and new regulations are under development to achieve this. To inform decisions on GHG regulations, this study has modeled the CO<sub>2</sub> emission abatement potentials and costs towards 2050 for all ships above 400 gross tons. We explore CO<sub>2</sub> reduction pathways based on marginal abatement cost curves (MACC) for 2030, 2040 and 2050. MACC is an important tool to assess the potential impact of regulations and can inform current policy debates as well as ship owners that need to develop their decarbonization strategies. Compared to previous work, we provide global MACCs taking into account the latest technologies and cost development, including alternative fuels. The updated MACC is based on more than 50 state-of-the-art abatement measures, 10 fuel systems and 8 fuels. The results indicate that the revised IMO GHG strategy ambition of 20–30 % GHG emission reduction in 2030, relative to 2008, can be reached at a marginal cost of 50–100 USD/tCO<sub>2</sub>; 70–80 % emission reduction in 2040 can be achieved at 230–240 USD/tCO<sub>2</sub> and net-zero emissions in 2050 at a marginal cost of 300 USD/tCO<sub>2</sub>. The two inputs which have the highest impact on the results are the future cost of carbon-neutral fuels and growth in seaborne trade.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100885,"journal":{"name":"Maritime Transport Research","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666822X24000108/pdfft?md5=fc5858e06c676f52b240d235e45222d5&pid=1-s2.0-S2666822X24000108-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141072646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-01-23DOI: 10.1016/j.martra.2024.100103
Olav Loennechen , Kjetil Fagerholt , Benjamin Lagemann , Magnus Stålhane
This paper studies the maritime fleet composition problem with uncertain future fuel and carbon prices under the restriction of complying with future greenhouse gas (GHG) emission restrictions. We propose a two-stage stochastic programming model that can be adapted to two different variants of this problem. The first variant considers the Maritime Fleet Renewal Problem where there is an existing initial fleet to be renewed through scrapping and acquisitions, as well as retrofitting of ships in the current fleet. The second variant considers the Maritime Fleet Size and Mix Problem, where also the initial fleet must be determined. When applying the model to a fleet of Supramax bulk carriers as a case study, we find that LNG- and methanol-based power systems are favorable initial choices. Two different scenario sets, with 50% and 90% reduction restrictions by 2045, are investigated. Depending on the ambition level, retrofits towards ammonia can be cost-effective.
{"title":"Maritime fleet composition under future greenhouse gas emission restrictions and uncertain fuel prices","authors":"Olav Loennechen , Kjetil Fagerholt , Benjamin Lagemann , Magnus Stålhane","doi":"10.1016/j.martra.2024.100103","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2024.100103","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper studies the maritime fleet composition problem with uncertain future fuel and carbon prices under the restriction of complying with future greenhouse gas (GHG) emission restrictions. We propose a two-stage stochastic programming model that can be adapted to two different variants of this problem. The first variant considers the Maritime Fleet Renewal Problem where there is an existing initial fleet to be renewed through scrapping and acquisitions, as well as retrofitting of ships in the current fleet. The second variant considers the Maritime Fleet Size and Mix Problem, where also the initial fleet must be determined. When applying the model to a fleet of Supramax bulk carriers as a case study, we find that LNG- and methanol-based power systems are favorable initial choices. Two different scenario sets, with 50% and 90% reduction restrictions by 2045, are investigated. Depending on the ambition level, retrofits towards ammonia can be cost-effective.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100885,"journal":{"name":"Maritime Transport Research","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666822X24000017/pdfft?md5=1744d22e05f186b00b76fa29e2c952b9&pid=1-s2.0-S2666822X24000017-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139548628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-03-18DOI: 10.1016/j.martra.2024.100107
Xuanhe Zhang , Tao Liu , Yan Li , Junzhong Bao
Expert judgment has been widely utilized in ship risk assessment. The traditional method is believed to be capable of processing only designated linguistic variables, which fails to capture the degree of expert hesitation in assessing a complex system. A novel model, the bi-independent hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set (BHFLTS), based on the hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set (HFLTS), is proposed to incorporate this hesitation. This paper also identifies ten navigational hazards to maritime autonomous surface ship (MASS) operation based on a literature review. In addition, the BHFLTS approach combined with the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) is utilized for hazard assessment and ranking, and with this method, “Collision avoidance decision algorithm malfunction”, “Ship situation awareness system failure” and “Command transmission system failure” are rated as the top three navigational hazards that threaten MASS operation.
专家判断已被广泛应用于船舶风险评估。传统方法被认为只能处理指定的语言变量,无法捕捉专家在评估复杂系统时的犹豫程度。本文在犹豫模糊语言项集(HFLTS)的基础上,提出了一种新型模型--双独立犹豫模糊语言项集(BHFLTS),以纳入这种犹豫。本文还在文献综述的基础上确定了海上自主水面舰艇(MASS)运行的十大航行危险。此外,还利用 BHFLTS 方法结合与理想解相似度排序偏好技术(TOPSIS)进行了危险评估和排序,并通过该方法将 "避撞决策算法故障"、"船舶态势感知系统故障 "和 "指挥传输系统故障 "评为威胁 MASS 运行的前三大航行危险。
{"title":"A novel approach to hazard evaluation for MASS operation based on a hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set","authors":"Xuanhe Zhang , Tao Liu , Yan Li , Junzhong Bao","doi":"10.1016/j.martra.2024.100107","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2024.100107","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Expert judgment has been widely utilized in ship risk assessment. The traditional method is believed to be capable of processing only designated linguistic variables, which fails to capture the degree of expert hesitation in assessing a complex system. A novel model, the bi-independent hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set (BHFLTS), based on the hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set (HFLTS), is proposed to incorporate this hesitation. This paper also identifies ten navigational hazards to maritime autonomous surface ship (MASS) operation based on a literature review. In addition, the BHFLTS approach combined with the technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) is utilized for hazard assessment and ranking, and with this method, “Collision avoidance decision algorithm malfunction”, “Ship situation awareness system failure” and “Command transmission system failure” are rated as the top three navigational hazards that threaten MASS operation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100885,"journal":{"name":"Maritime Transport Research","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100107"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666822X24000054/pdfft?md5=ae34c464bd8d3549c65452a9e96aba3b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666822X24000054-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140145232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-02-28DOI: 10.1016/j.martra.2024.100104
Spencer August Dugan, Ingrid Bouwer Utne
Vessel losses of command (e.g., propulsion, electrical power, or steering failure) can serve as the initiating event for significant maritime accidents, such as grounding. It is therefore important to estimate the frequency of such events for navigational risk assessments. Despite the existence of previous studies, new data have become available that may reveal more precise and useful information for risk estimations and accident prevention. This paper analyzes two databases of vessel losses of command within Norway’s economic exclusive area over a five year period. The study utilizes a novel database of incidents observed by the Norwegian Coastal Administration’s (NCA) Vessel Traffic Services (VTS), in addition to incidents reported to IHS Markit over the same five year period. Automatic identification system (AIS) data is used to construct activity metrics of vessel activity, which are used to compute vessel loss of command incidence rates for ship types. To account for under-reporting, capture–recapture methods are used to calculate adjusted incidence-rates. The duration of each incident is recorded and used to construct distributions of repair times. Probabilities of towing and anchoring are computed for ship types and incident location. The results indicate that previous studies may have underestimated the incidence of vessel loss of command. Using the best-case scenario, cargo ships and tankers suffer losses of command more frequently than other ship types. Significant under-reporting of losses of command was observed in the IHS Markit database.
{"title":"Statistical analysis of vessel loss of command frequency","authors":"Spencer August Dugan, Ingrid Bouwer Utne","doi":"10.1016/j.martra.2024.100104","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2024.100104","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Vessel losses of command (e.g., propulsion, electrical power, or steering failure) can serve as the initiating event for significant maritime accidents, such as grounding. It is therefore important to estimate the frequency of such events for navigational risk assessments. Despite the existence of previous studies, new data have become available that may reveal more precise and useful information for risk estimations and accident prevention. This paper analyzes two databases of vessel losses of command within Norway’s economic exclusive area over a five year period. The study utilizes a novel database of incidents observed by the Norwegian Coastal Administration’s (NCA) Vessel Traffic Services (VTS), in addition to incidents reported to IHS Markit over the same five year period. Automatic identification system (AIS) data is used to construct activity metrics of vessel activity, which are used to compute vessel loss of command incidence rates for ship types. To account for under-reporting, capture–recapture methods are used to calculate adjusted incidence-rates. The duration of each incident is recorded and used to construct distributions of repair times. Probabilities of towing and anchoring are computed for ship types and incident location. The results indicate that previous studies may have underestimated the incidence of vessel loss of command. Using the best-case scenario, cargo ships and tankers suffer losses of command more frequently than other ship types. Significant under-reporting of losses of command was observed in the IHS Markit database.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100885,"journal":{"name":"Maritime Transport Research","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666822X24000029/pdfft?md5=16ec93eb9a61d01b2313c6ebf1aa6a41&pid=1-s2.0-S2666822X24000029-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139992426","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-04-24DOI: 10.1016/j.martra.2024.100111
Jiann-Haw Liou , Po-Hsing Tseng
Port safety plays an important role in port operations. Ship size has become larger and the port environment has rapidly changed in recent years. Ship accidents occur in the port area due to the complex environment in the port area. To improve past decision analysis methods on port operation safety fields and reduce fatalities and financial loss for potential accidents, the novelty of this study is to construct a safety index of ports with the application of the Best Worst Method (BWM). Four dimensions and 14 indicators were summarized based on an intensive literature review. The BWM was implemented to prioritize the weights of dimensions and indicators. Based on 21 expert questionnaires, the results indicate that the ranking of dimensions is ‘human’, ‘ship facilities’, ‘port facilities’, and ‘documentation check’. Regarding the ranking of indicators, the top three are ‘fire-fighting and life-saving equipment’, ‘captain’, and ‘pilot’. Safety improvement strategies (e.g. revising inappropriate operational rules and strengthening human safety education and training) based on these research findings are provided. The merits of this paper are presenting a simpler questionnaire-filling method and overcoming the traditional complicated questionnaire survey process and research limitations (e.g. indicator independence problems in the Analytic Hierarchy Process, and the complexation of filling out a questionnaire in the Analytic Network Process). In addition, the findings can help decision-making for port management authorities, port practitioners, and shipping operators (shipowners) regarding policy implementations of port safety.
{"title":"Exploring the ship operation safety indicators of international ports in Taiwan","authors":"Jiann-Haw Liou , Po-Hsing Tseng","doi":"10.1016/j.martra.2024.100111","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2024.100111","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Port safety plays an important role in port operations. Ship size has become larger and the port environment has rapidly changed in recent years. Ship accidents occur in the port area due to the complex environment in the port area. To improve past decision analysis methods on port operation safety fields and reduce fatalities and financial loss for potential accidents, the novelty of this study is to construct a safety index of ports with the application of the Best Worst Method (BWM). Four dimensions and 14 indicators were summarized based on an intensive literature review. The BWM was implemented to prioritize the weights of dimensions and indicators. Based on 21 expert questionnaires, the results indicate that the ranking of dimensions is ‘human’, ‘ship facilities’, ‘port facilities’, and ‘documentation check’. Regarding the ranking of indicators, the top three are ‘fire-fighting and life-saving equipment’, ‘captain’, and ‘pilot’. Safety improvement strategies (e.g. revising inappropriate operational rules and strengthening human safety education and training) based on these research findings are provided. The merits of this paper are presenting a simpler questionnaire-filling method and overcoming the traditional complicated questionnaire survey process and research limitations (e.g. indicator independence problems in the Analytic Hierarchy Process, and the complexation of filling out a questionnaire in the Analytic Network Process). In addition, the findings can help decision-making for port management authorities, port practitioners, and shipping operators (shipowners) regarding policy implementations of port safety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100885,"journal":{"name":"Maritime Transport Research","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666822X24000091/pdfft?md5=6b7294b425897d5900f78628638c4068&pid=1-s2.0-S2666822X24000091-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140644683","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-03-26DOI: 10.1016/j.martra.2024.100109
Albert Veenstra , Arjen de Waal
We present an analysis of the impact of large container ship call sizes on the operational efficiency of container terminals as well as on hinterland modes of transport. We use standard container terminal simulation software, that can represent a realistic terminal operation. We include dynamic crane productivity, arrival time uncertainty, and deepsea vessel prioritisation in our model.
Our experiments investigate the impact of introducing larger call sizes of container ships, increasing the uncertainty in arrival times of deepsea ships, and the impact of the phenomenon of split calls that are employed by the largest container ships in certain regions in the world. We differentiate between the impact on terminal operations, land-based hinterland traffic, and hinterland traffic over water, through barges and feeder vessels.
Our results show that introducing large ships with large container call sizes comes with benefits and drawbacks. Benefits can be found in planning advantages for both the deepsea ships and barges and feeders handled in the terminal. Drawbacks occur as a result of operational peaks in subsystems such as the quay cranes, the stack and the land side gates. Higher uncertainty deteriorates the performance of the terminal, but the impact on the hinterland modes of transport is greater than on the large deepsea vessels. The impact of the split call is that it brings all the disadvantages of large vessels, but none of the benefits.
Our analysis shows the operational impact of large call sizes on terminal operations and hinterland transport operations, based on container terminal simulations with a higher degree of realism than previous work. In addition, we offer, for the first time, insights in the impact of split calls of container ships at container terminals.
{"title":"The impact of container call size evidence from simulation modelling","authors":"Albert Veenstra , Arjen de Waal","doi":"10.1016/j.martra.2024.100109","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2024.100109","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We present an analysis of the impact of large container ship call sizes on the operational efficiency of container terminals as well as on hinterland modes of transport. We use standard container terminal simulation software, that can represent a realistic terminal operation. We include dynamic crane productivity, arrival time uncertainty, and deepsea vessel prioritisation in our model.</p><p>Our experiments investigate the impact of introducing larger call sizes of container ships, increasing the uncertainty in arrival times of deepsea ships, and the impact of the phenomenon of split calls that are employed by the largest container ships in certain regions in the world. We differentiate between the impact on terminal operations, land-based hinterland traffic, and hinterland traffic over water, through barges and feeder vessels.</p><p>Our results show that introducing large ships with large container call sizes comes with benefits and drawbacks. Benefits can be found in planning advantages for both the deepsea ships and barges and feeders handled in the terminal. Drawbacks occur as a result of operational peaks in subsystems such as the quay cranes, the stack and the land side gates. Higher uncertainty deteriorates the performance of the terminal, but the impact on the hinterland modes of transport is greater than on the large deepsea vessels. The impact of the split call is that it brings all the disadvantages of large vessels, but none of the benefits.</p><p>Our analysis shows the operational impact of large call sizes on terminal operations and hinterland transport operations, based on container terminal simulations with a higher degree of realism than previous work. In addition, we offer, for the first time, insights in the impact of split calls of container ships at container terminals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100885,"journal":{"name":"Maritime Transport Research","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666822X24000078/pdfft?md5=d33cdcde3c87105e0f060a70eca23259&pid=1-s2.0-S2666822X24000078-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140290366","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-05-25DOI: 10.1016/j.martra.2024.100113
Michael Hanowsky , Kenneth Ned Mitchell , Keshav Kothari , William Jeff Lillycrop , Drew Loney
A maritime transportation system is a network of ports and commercial terminals connected by navigation channels and navigable inland rivers that enables international trade and the global supply chain. The channels and rivers are subject to recurring sedimentation, which reduces available depths, sailing drafts, and volumes of cargo that vessels can transport between ports. To maintain this network at sufficient depths and enable cost-effective maritime transportation, a specialized fleet of dredging vessels, or dredges, periodically remove accumulated sediment and restore capacity. Scheduling dredges to perform work requires simultaneous consideration of factors specific to the location, dredge, and underlying maritime network and, in practice, often results in significant inefficiencies and delays. Previous models proposed in the literature to optimize dredge scheduling are either intractable or consider only limited aspects of the problem. This paper defines the problem of tactical dredging portfolio scheduling, introduces the General Dredge Scheduling Model (GDSM) as a constraint programming model to solve this problem, and applies GDSM to a realistic problem composed of a portfolio of dredging jobs, fleet of dredges, and sets of seasonal and environmental restrictions.
{"title":"Optimal scheduling of maintenance dredging in a maritime transportation system","authors":"Michael Hanowsky , Kenneth Ned Mitchell , Keshav Kothari , William Jeff Lillycrop , Drew Loney","doi":"10.1016/j.martra.2024.100113","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2024.100113","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A maritime transportation system is a network of ports and commercial terminals connected by navigation channels and navigable inland rivers that enables international trade and the global supply chain. The channels and rivers are subject to recurring sedimentation, which reduces available depths, sailing drafts, and volumes of cargo that vessels can transport between ports. To maintain this network at sufficient depths and enable cost-effective maritime transportation, a specialized fleet of dredging vessels, or dredges, periodically remove accumulated sediment and restore capacity. Scheduling dredges to perform work requires simultaneous consideration of factors specific to the location, dredge, and underlying maritime network and, in practice, often results in significant inefficiencies and delays. Previous models proposed in the literature to optimize dredge scheduling are either intractable or consider only limited aspects of the problem. This paper defines the problem of tactical dredging portfolio scheduling, introduces the General Dredge Scheduling Model (GDSM) as a constraint programming model to solve this problem, and applies GDSM to a realistic problem composed of a portfolio of dredging jobs, fleet of dredges, and sets of seasonal and environmental restrictions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100885,"journal":{"name":"Maritime Transport Research","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666822X2400011X/pdfft?md5=7cb1c18d1727cead9d4a407b2b2945ef&pid=1-s2.0-S2666822X2400011X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141096171","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-01Epub Date: 2024-04-10DOI: 10.1016/j.martra.2024.100110
Julia Burgén, Staffan Bram
Many advancements are being made within the domain of autonomous shipping, motivating discussions of corresponding amendments to international safety regulations within the International Maritime Organization. Near-coastal passenger ferries are a form of sea traffic that has been the target of automation trials due to their short voyages and relatively protected waters of operation. This study investigated emergency evacuation from a range of such ships, covering both the current situation (focused on crew tasks, external rescue actors and interactions) and safety aspects that should be considered when automation brings about new work patterns, such as remote supervision and control. The study employed qualitative methods – interviews, field visits and a stakeholder workshop. Results give insight into ferry evacuation processes and challenges in their current form. In addition, results from the application of different automated evacuation scenarios suggest that more detailed studies are needed within the areas of remote operation situation awareness, remote operator and onboard personnel competencies, passenger safety information and communication, simple and robust evacuation equipment, technical means allowing assistance between autonomous and regular ships, and lastly, both procedures and interfaces for collaboration in a changing rescue network.
{"title":"Safety on automated passenger ships: Exploration of evacuation scenarios for coastal vessels","authors":"Julia Burgén, Staffan Bram","doi":"10.1016/j.martra.2024.100110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2024.100110","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many advancements are being made within the domain of autonomous shipping, motivating discussions of corresponding amendments to international safety regulations within the International Maritime Organization. Near-coastal passenger ferries are a form of sea traffic that has been the target of automation trials due to their short voyages and relatively protected waters of operation. This study investigated emergency evacuation from a range of such ships, covering both the current situation (focused on crew tasks, external rescue actors and interactions) and safety aspects that should be considered when automation brings about new work patterns, such as remote supervision and control. The study employed qualitative methods – interviews, field visits and a stakeholder workshop. Results give insight into ferry evacuation processes and challenges in their current form. In addition, results from the application of different automated evacuation scenarios suggest that more detailed studies are needed within the areas of remote operation situation awareness, remote operator and onboard personnel competencies, passenger safety information and communication, simple and robust evacuation equipment, technical means allowing assistance between autonomous and regular ships, and lastly, both procedures and interfaces for collaboration in a changing rescue network.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100885,"journal":{"name":"Maritime Transport Research","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666822X2400008X/pdfft?md5=e0d5a08158d9686618e70c08ea1542e2&pid=1-s2.0-S2666822X2400008X-main.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140542604","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-12-01Epub Date: 2023-06-29DOI: 10.1016/j.martra.2023.100095
Thalis P.V. Zis , Harilaos N. Psaraftis , Martina Reche-Vilanova
The European Union (EU) transport policy recognizes the importance of the waterborne transport systems as key elements for sustainable growth in Europe. By 2030, 30% of total road freight over 300 km should shift to rail or waterborne transport, and more than 50% by 2050. Thus far, this ambition has failed but there have been several project initiatives within the EU to address these issues. In one of these projects, we consider a new waterborne transport system for Europe that is green, robust, flexible, more automated and autonomous, and able to connect both rural and urban terminals. The purpose of this paper is to describe work and preliminary results from this project. To that effect, and in order to assess any solutions contemplated, a comprehensive set of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) has been defined, and three specific use cases within Europe are examined and evaluated according to these KPIs. KPIs represent the criteria under which the set of solutions developed are evaluated, and also compared to non-autonomous solutions. They are grouped under economic, environmental and social KPIs. KPIs have been selected after a consultation process involving project partners and external Advisory Group members. Links to EU transport and other regulatory action are also discussed.
{"title":"Design and application of a key performance indicator (KPI) framework for autonomous shipping in Europe","authors":"Thalis P.V. Zis , Harilaos N. Psaraftis , Martina Reche-Vilanova","doi":"10.1016/j.martra.2023.100095","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2023.100095","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The European Union (EU) transport policy recognizes the importance of the waterborne transport systems as key elements for sustainable growth in Europe. By 2030, 30% of total road freight over 300 km should shift to rail or waterborne transport, and more than 50% by 2050. Thus far, this ambition has failed but there have been several project initiatives within the EU to address these issues. In one of these projects, we consider a new waterborne transport system for Europe that is green, robust, flexible, more automated and autonomous, and able to connect both rural and urban terminals. The purpose of this paper is to describe work and preliminary results from this project. To that effect, and in order to assess any solutions contemplated, a comprehensive set of Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) has been defined, and three specific use cases within Europe are examined and evaluated according to these KPIs. KPIs represent the criteria under which the set of solutions developed are evaluated, and also compared to non-autonomous solutions. They are grouped under economic, environmental and social KPIs. KPIs have been selected after a consultation process involving project partners and external Advisory Group members. Links to EU transport and other regulatory action are also discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100885,"journal":{"name":"Maritime Transport Research","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100095"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49878818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}