首页 > 最新文献

Nature-Based Solutions最新文献

英文 中文
Human, or nature-led? A spectrum of nature-based solutions 人类还是自然?一系列基于自然的解决方案
Pub Date : 2025-06-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100249
Alan Puttock, Roger E. Auster, Naomi Gatis, Richard E. Brazier
In the face of a global climate and biodiversity crisis, alongside intensifying natural hazards, there is growing interest in solutions that work with nature rather than against it—often referred to as Nature-based Solutions (NbS).
NbS encompass a spectrum of approaches addressing diverse challenges. Based on our research in water resources, landscape management, and climate mitigation, in this perspective piece we identify two forms of NbS: (1) human-led interventions (HNbS) that are actively designed and maintained, and (2) nature-led solutions (NNbS) that allow natural processes to function with minimal human intervention.
Drawing on our experience working with practitioners and policymakers, we highlight four key factors influencing the uptake and implementation of HNbS and NNbS: (1) the need for certainty, (2) balancing co-benefits and risks, (3) governance structures, and (4) societal perceptions of NbS.
We propose that viewing NbS on a spectrum—from human-led to nature-led—offers a valuable framework for integrating these approaches alongside engineered solutions in policy and management. Recognising and leveraging the strengths of nature-led solutions can enhance sustainable, multi-benefit resilience in the face of environmental challenges.
面对全球气候和生物多样性危机,以及不断加剧的自然灾害,人们越来越关注与自然合作而不是对抗自然的解决方案——通常被称为基于自然的解决方案(NbS)。国家统计局包含了一系列应对各种挑战的方法。基于我们在水资源、景观管理和气候减缓方面的研究,在这篇观点文章中,我们确定了两种形式的NbS:(1)积极设计和维护的人为主导的干预(HNbS),以及(2)自然主导的解决方案(NNbS),允许自然过程在最小的人为干预下发挥作用。根据我们与从业人员和政策制定者合作的经验,我们强调了影响HNbS和NNbS吸收和实施的四个关键因素:(1)确定性的需要;(2)平衡共同利益和风险;(3)治理结构;(4)社会对NbS的看法。我们建议,从人类主导到自然主导的范围来看国家统计局,为将这些方法与政策和管理中的工程解决方案结合起来提供了一个有价值的框架。认识到并利用以自然为主导的解决方案的优势,可以在面临环境挑战时增强可持续的、多方受益的复原力。
{"title":"Human, or nature-led? A spectrum of nature-based solutions","authors":"Alan Puttock,&nbsp;Roger E. Auster,&nbsp;Naomi Gatis,&nbsp;Richard E. Brazier","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100249","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100249","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the face of a global climate and biodiversity crisis, alongside intensifying natural hazards, there is growing interest in solutions that work with nature rather than against it—often referred to as Nature-based Solutions (NbS).</div><div>NbS encompass a spectrum of approaches addressing diverse challenges. Based on our research in water resources, landscape management, and climate mitigation, in this perspective piece we identify two forms of NbS: (1) human-led interventions (H<img>NbS) that are actively designed and maintained, and (2) nature-led solutions (N<img>NbS) that allow natural processes to function with minimal human intervention.</div><div>Drawing on our experience working with practitioners and policymakers, we highlight four key factors influencing the uptake and implementation of H<img>NbS and N<img>NbS: (1) the need for certainty, (2) balancing co-benefits and risks, (3) governance structures, and (4) societal perceptions of NbS.</div><div>We propose that viewing NbS on a spectrum—from human-led to nature-led—offers a valuable framework for integrating these approaches alongside engineered solutions in policy and management. Recognising and leveraging the strengths of nature-led solutions can enhance sustainable, multi-benefit resilience in the face of environmental challenges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144522621","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Targeted irrigation to improve the cooling potential of urban trees as a nature-based solution: Insights from a field trail in Hanover 有针对性的灌溉,以提高城市树木的冷却潜力,作为一种基于自然的解决方案:来自汉诺威田野小径的见解
Pub Date : 2025-06-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100247
Janina Haupt , Jochen Hack , Antje Backhaus
With regard to the rising temperatures due to climate change and the intensification of the urban heat island effect (UHIE), nature-based solutions (NbS) are becoming increasingly important. In particular trees can mitigate the effects of the UHIE by shading and through transpiration. As trees suffering from heat and drought decrease their cooling properties under stress, this study investigates the effects of supplementary irrigation to increase the cooling capacities. The research focus is on how different irrigation practices can directly support the cooling effects of young urban trees as a NbS. The novelty of our study is the direct field trial comparison of irrigation quantities in combination with the quantification of their microclimatic effects. From May to September 2024, we observed three groups of Tilia cordata (unirrigated, monthly irrigated, weekly irrigated) in the city of Hanover, Germany, and measured air temperature and relative humidity (RH) within the tree crowns. The results show, that an investment in tree irrigation results in an increase of cooling capability of up to -0.67 °C and up to +5.98 %RH on hot days over 30 °C. Urban tree care is more than just keeping trees alive by minimizing water use, trees are a valuable resource that we can benefit from by using water wisely. Future-oriented tree irrigation, which not only ensures the survival of the trees but also promotes their natural functions, optimises the urban climate in a natural way.
针对气候变化导致的气温上升和城市热岛效应(UHIE)的加剧,基于自然的解决方案(NbS)变得越来越重要。特别是树木可以通过遮阳和蒸腾作用减轻UHIE的影响。由于树木在高温和干旱胁迫下冷却性能下降,本研究探讨了补充灌溉对提高冷却能力的影响。研究的重点是不同的灌溉方式如何直接支持城市幼树作为NbS的冷却效果。我们研究的新颖之处在于直接田间试验比较灌溉量,并结合其小气候效应的量化。2024年5月至9月,在德国汉诺威市对三组灌水、月灌水、周灌水的椴树进行了观测,测量了树冠内的温度和相对湿度。结果表明,在30°C以上的高温天气中,树木灌溉的投资可增加高达-0.67°C和+ 5.98% RH的冷却能力。城市树木护理不仅仅是通过减少用水来保持树木的活力,树木是一种宝贵的资源,我们可以通过明智地利用水来受益。面向未来的树木灌溉,既保证了树木的生存,又促进了树木的自然功能,以自然的方式优化了城市气候。
{"title":"Targeted irrigation to improve the cooling potential of urban trees as a nature-based solution: Insights from a field trail in Hanover","authors":"Janina Haupt ,&nbsp;Jochen Hack ,&nbsp;Antje Backhaus","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100247","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100247","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With regard to the rising temperatures due to climate change and the intensification of the urban heat island effect (UHIE), nature-based solutions (NbS) are becoming increasingly important. In particular trees can mitigate the effects of the UHIE by shading and through transpiration. As trees suffering from heat and drought decrease their cooling properties under stress, this study investigates the effects of supplementary irrigation to increase the cooling capacities. The research focus is on how different irrigation practices can directly support the cooling effects of young urban trees as a NbS. The novelty of our study is the direct field trial comparison of irrigation quantities in combination with the quantification of their microclimatic effects. From May to September 2024, we observed three groups of <em>Tilia cordata</em> (unirrigated, monthly irrigated, weekly irrigated) in the city of Hanover, Germany, and measured air temperature and relative humidity (RH) within the tree crowns. The results show, that an investment in tree irrigation results in an increase of cooling capability of up to -0.67 °C and up to +5.98 %RH on hot days over 30 °C. Urban tree care is more than just keeping trees alive by minimizing water use, trees are a valuable resource that we can benefit from by using water wisely. Future-oriented tree irrigation, which not only ensures the survival of the trees but also promotes their natural functions, optimises the urban climate in a natural way.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100247"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144517100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nature-based solutions for urban climate resilience: implementation, contribution, and effectiveness 基于自然的城市气候适应能力解决方案:实施、贡献和有效性
Pub Date : 2025-06-09 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100245
Gemechis B Mosisa , Bobe Bedadi , Gemedo Dalle , Nega Tassie
Driven by the need to enhance urban climate resilience, there is a growing preference for nature-based solutions (NbS) over conventional architecture, mostly attributed to their ecological benefits and economic advantages. This systematic review analyzed global knowledge and research gaps regarding the implementation, contribution, and effectiveness (ICE) of NbS. Using Publish and Perish version 8 software, across Google Scholar and Elsevier Scopus, 749 publications were initially retrieved (2014 – 2025), with 84 (11.20 % of the initial search results) meeting inclusion criteria. Additionally, a qualitative analysis was conducted on a sample of 26 publications, selected from the initial 84 articles. The review demonstrates that though NbS hold substantial promise for optimizing urban climate resilience, their successful implementation is contingent upon addressing a complex relationship between factors like data-driven planning, stakeholder awareness and engagement, resource availability, institutional framework, and context-specific considerations. Moreover, it highlights the significance of integrating ecological, economic, and social dimensions, tailoring interventions to local needs, and utilizing rigorous evaluation methodologies to ensure the effectiveness and long-term contribution of NbS in fostering resilient urban environments to the climate change impacts. Though the scope of this review was constrained by various factors like language and database, it identified significant research gaps, including limited geographical case studies, reliance on secondary data and sources, methodological inconsistencies, lack of standardized approaches, and inadequate understanding of the complex functions of NbS in urban climate resilience. For instance, of the 26 qualitative sample publications selected for this systematic review, almost 54 % employed only secondary data sources, and eight publications lacked clear and specified data analysis techniques. Hence, future research should prioritize primary data, robust methodologies, transdisciplinary collaboration, and a broader geographical focus to promote the effectiveness and successful implementation of NbS.
在增强城市气候适应能力的需求的推动下,人们越来越倾向于基于自然的解决方案(NbS),而不是传统的建筑,这主要归功于它们的生态效益和经济优势。本系统综述分析了国家统计局的实施、贡献和有效性方面的全球知识和研究差距。使用Publish and Perish version 8软件,在b谷歌Scholar和Elsevier Scopus中,最初检索了749篇出版物(2014 - 2025),其中84篇(占初始搜索结果的11.20%)符合纳入标准。此外,从最初的84篇文章中选取了26篇出版物作为样本进行了定性分析。回顾表明,尽管国家统计局在优化城市气候适应能力方面有着巨大的希望,但其成功实施取决于解决数据驱动型规划、利益相关者意识和参与、资源可用性、制度框架和具体情况考虑等因素之间的复杂关系。此外,本文还强调了整合生态、经济和社会维度、根据当地需求定制干预措施以及利用严格的评估方法的重要性,以确保国家统计局在培养抵御气候变化影响的城市环境方面的有效性和长期贡献。尽管本综述的范围受到语言和数据库等各种因素的限制,但它发现了重大的研究空白,包括地理案例研究有限,对二手数据和来源的依赖,方法不一致,缺乏标准化方法,以及对NbS在城市气候适应能力中的复杂功能的理解不足。例如,在为本系统综述选择的26个定性样本出版物中,近54%仅使用二手数据源,8个出版物缺乏明确和指定的数据分析技术。因此,未来的研究应优先考虑原始数据、稳健的方法、跨学科合作和更广泛的地理关注点,以促进国家统计局的有效性和成功实施。
{"title":"Nature-based solutions for urban climate resilience: implementation, contribution, and effectiveness","authors":"Gemechis B Mosisa ,&nbsp;Bobe Bedadi ,&nbsp;Gemedo Dalle ,&nbsp;Nega Tassie","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100245","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100245","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Driven by the need to enhance urban climate resilience, there is a growing preference for nature-based solutions (NbS) over conventional architecture, mostly attributed to their ecological benefits and economic advantages. This systematic review analyzed global knowledge and research gaps regarding the implementation, contribution, and effectiveness (ICE) of NbS. Using Publish and Perish version 8 software, across Google Scholar and Elsevier Scopus, 749 publications were initially retrieved (2014 – 2025), with 84 (11.20 % of the initial search results) meeting inclusion criteria. Additionally, a qualitative analysis was conducted on a sample of 26 publications, selected from the initial 84 articles. The review demonstrates that though NbS hold substantial promise for optimizing urban climate resilience, their successful implementation is contingent upon addressing a complex relationship between factors like data-driven planning, stakeholder awareness and engagement, resource availability, institutional framework, and context-specific considerations. Moreover, it highlights the significance of integrating ecological, economic, and social dimensions, tailoring interventions to local needs, and utilizing rigorous evaluation methodologies to ensure the effectiveness and long-term contribution of NbS in fostering resilient urban environments to the climate change impacts. Though the scope of this review was constrained by various factors like language and database, it identified significant research gaps, including limited geographical case studies, reliance on secondary data and sources, methodological inconsistencies, lack of standardized approaches, and inadequate understanding of the complex functions of NbS in urban climate resilience. For instance, of the 26 qualitative sample publications selected for this systematic review, almost 54 % employed only secondary data sources, and eight publications lacked clear and specified data analysis techniques. Hence, future research should prioritize primary data, robust methodologies, transdisciplinary collaboration, and a broader geographical focus to promote the effectiveness and successful implementation of NbS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144306723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Households’ perceptions on resilience building interventions towards enhancing community socio-economic development in Southern Zimbabwe 家庭对增强津巴布韦南部社区社会经济发展的复原力建设干预措施的看法
Pub Date : 2025-06-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100246
Defe Rameck, Matsa Mark, Mavugara Roberta
The study assessed households’ perceptions on the contribution of climate resilience interventions to attain community socio-economic development in Southern Zimbabwe. The researcher adopted a mixed method design which utilized both qualitative and quantitative paradigms. Data was collected from 352 households from the 4 Enhancing Community Resilience and Sustainability Projects (ECRAS) wards. Qualitative data was subjected to content analysis while quantitative data was subjected to SPSS version 22.0 for analysis. Climate change and variability impacts in Mwenezi District of Southern Zimbabwe have contributed to failure of the livestock production sector and crop production sector which are the main livelihood options of households in the District. Eventually this retarded community socio-economic development. In response, Government departments, Non-Governmental Organisations and communities collaborated to initiate interventions to manage climate change impacts on community socio-economic development. The efforts made by the stakeholders have evidenced that building climate resilience is contributing significantly to community socio-economic development. The interventions initiated have contributed to food security and dietary diversity, clean water availability, enhanced livestock production and improvement on the community sanitation and hygiene. The households interviewed and some stakeholders’ perceived resilience building as a panacea to climate change induced impacts in communities since households largely depend on climate sensitive sectors. The study therefore recommends adoption of climate smart interventions for all development agendas since majority of households in Southern Zimbabwe largely depend on climate sensitive sectors.
该研究评估了津巴布韦南部家庭对气候恢复干预措施对实现社区社会经济发展的贡献的看法。本研究采用定性与定量相结合的混合方法设计。数据来自4个增强社区复原力和可持续性项目(ECRAS)病房的352户家庭。定性资料采用内容分析,定量资料采用SPSS 22.0进行分析。津巴布韦南部Mwenezi地区的气候变化和多变性影响导致该地区作为家庭主要生计选择的畜牧生产部门和作物生产部门的失败。最终,这阻碍了社区的社会经济发展。为此,政府部门、非政府机构和社区合作,采取措施,管理气候变化对社区社会经济发展的影响。利益攸关方所做的努力证明,建立气候适应能力对社区社会经济发展作出了重大贡献。所开展的干预措施有助于粮食安全和饮食多样性、提供清洁水、提高牲畜生产以及改善社区环境卫生和个人卫生。受访的家庭和一些利益相关者认为,由于家庭在很大程度上依赖于气候敏感部门,韧性建设是应对社区气候变化影响的灵丹妙药。因此,该研究建议在所有发展议程中采用气候智能型干预措施,因为津巴布韦南部的大多数家庭在很大程度上依赖于气候敏感部门。
{"title":"Households’ perceptions on resilience building interventions towards enhancing community socio-economic development in Southern Zimbabwe","authors":"Defe Rameck,&nbsp;Matsa Mark,&nbsp;Mavugara Roberta","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100246","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100246","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study assessed households’ perceptions on the contribution of climate resilience interventions to attain community socio-economic development in Southern Zimbabwe. The researcher adopted a mixed method design which utilized both qualitative and quantitative paradigms. Data was collected from 352 households from the 4 Enhancing Community Resilience and Sustainability Projects (ECRAS) wards. Qualitative data was subjected to content analysis while quantitative data was subjected to SPSS version 22.0 for analysis. Climate change and variability impacts in Mwenezi District of Southern Zimbabwe have contributed to failure of the livestock production sector and crop production sector which are the main livelihood options of households in the District. Eventually this retarded community socio-economic development. In response, Government departments, Non-Governmental Organisations and communities collaborated to initiate interventions to manage climate change impacts on community socio-economic development. The efforts made by the stakeholders have evidenced that building climate resilience is contributing significantly to community socio-economic development. The interventions initiated have contributed to food security and dietary diversity, clean water availability, enhanced livestock production and improvement on the community sanitation and hygiene. The households interviewed and some stakeholders’ perceived resilience building as a panacea to climate change induced impacts in communities since households largely depend on climate sensitive sectors. The study therefore recommends adoption of climate smart interventions for all development agendas since majority of households in Southern Zimbabwe largely depend on climate sensitive sectors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144279781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Coastal resilience could be enhanced by co-interventions and synergistic Nature-based Solutions 通过联合干预和基于自然的协同解决方案,沿海恢复力可以得到增强
Pub Date : 2025-06-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100244
Paulina Filz , Rodrigo Beas-Luna , Luca Rindi , Julio Lorda , Jan Freiwald , Luis Malpica-Cruz
Human activities and climate change drive the degradation of marine ecosystems, which provide essential services such as carbon sequestration, coastal protection, and fisheries. This loss amplifies societal challenges, including climate change mitigation, disaster risk reduction, and socio-economic vulnerability. Nature-based Solutions (NbS) offer a strategic approach to address these challenges by protecting, managing, and restoring coastal ecosystems, enhancing biodiversity and human well-being. Despite growing recognition of NbS, large-scale implementation remains hindered by funding constraints, policy integration barriers, and difficulty scaling effective strategies. Here, we present a systematic literature review investigating these factors in marine ecosystems to improve our understanding of investment motivations and co-interventions. We analyzed 39 case studies of NbS interventions and 32 studies on implementation opportunities and barriers. Our findings indicate that ecosystem restoration is the most prevalent NbS intervention in marine systems, often initiated in response to extreme climate events and disaster risk reduction. However, successful implementation frequently requires complementary strategies, such as income diversification, to reduce anthropogenic pressures and enhance livelihood resilience. Moreover, we identify synergies between addressing societal challenges and promoting ecosystem recovery, offering valuable insights for managers and researchers. To scale NbS effectively, barriers related to financing, policy integration, and technical expertise must be addressed. Our findings highlight the need for integrated, adaptive solutions linking ecological restoration with community-based management and sustainable economic development, ensuring resilience and social justice. Future research should explore innovative marine NbS approaches that support human well-being and acknowledge nature’s intrinsic value.
人类活动和气候变化推动了海洋生态系统的退化,而海洋生态系统提供了碳封存、海岸保护和渔业等基本服务。这一损失加剧了社会挑战,包括减缓气候变化、减少灾害风险和社会经济脆弱性。基于自然的解决方案(NbS)通过保护、管理和恢复沿海生态系统,增强生物多样性和人类福祉,为应对这些挑战提供了一种战略方法。尽管人们越来越认识到国家统计局,但大规模实施仍然受到资金限制、政策整合障碍和难以扩大有效战略的阻碍。本文对海洋生态系统中的这些因素进行了系统的文献综述,以提高我们对投资动机和共同干预措施的理解。我们分析了39个国家统计局干预的案例研究和32个关于实施机会和障碍的研究。我们的研究结果表明,生态系统恢复是海洋系统中最普遍的国家统计局干预措施,通常是为了应对极端气候事件和减少灾害风险而启动的。然而,成功的实施往往需要补充战略,如收入多样化,以减少人为压力和增强生计复原力。此外,我们确定了解决社会挑战和促进生态系统恢复之间的协同作用,为管理者和研究人员提供了有价值的见解。为了有效扩大国家统计局的规模,必须解决与融资、政策整合和技术专长相关的障碍。我们的研究结果强调了将生态恢复与社区管理和可持续经济发展联系起来,确保复原力和社会正义的综合适应性解决方案的必要性。未来的研究应探索创新的海洋NbS方法,以支持人类福祉并承认自然的内在价值。
{"title":"Coastal resilience could be enhanced by co-interventions and synergistic Nature-based Solutions","authors":"Paulina Filz ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Beas-Luna ,&nbsp;Luca Rindi ,&nbsp;Julio Lorda ,&nbsp;Jan Freiwald ,&nbsp;Luis Malpica-Cruz","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100244","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100244","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human activities and climate change drive the degradation of marine ecosystems, which provide essential services such as carbon sequestration, coastal protection, and fisheries. This loss amplifies societal challenges, including climate change mitigation, disaster risk reduction, and socio-economic vulnerability. Nature-based Solutions (NbS) offer a strategic approach to address these challenges by protecting, managing, and restoring coastal ecosystems, enhancing biodiversity and human well-being. Despite growing recognition of NbS, large-scale implementation remains hindered by funding constraints, policy integration barriers, and difficulty scaling effective strategies. Here, we present a systematic literature review investigating these factors in marine ecosystems to improve our understanding of investment motivations and co-interventions. We analyzed 39 case studies of NbS interventions and 32 studies on implementation opportunities and barriers. Our findings indicate that ecosystem restoration is the most prevalent NbS intervention in marine systems, often initiated in response to extreme climate events and disaster risk reduction. However, successful implementation frequently requires complementary strategies, such as income diversification, to reduce anthropogenic pressures and enhance livelihood resilience. Moreover, we identify synergies between addressing societal challenges and promoting ecosystem recovery, offering valuable insights for managers and researchers. To scale NbS effectively, barriers related to financing, policy integration, and technical expertise must be addressed. Our findings highlight the need for integrated, adaptive solutions linking ecological restoration with community-based management and sustainable economic development, ensuring resilience and social justice. Future research should explore innovative marine NbS approaches that support human well-being and acknowledge nature’s intrinsic value.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144471899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Valuing present and future benefits provided by coastal wetlands and living shorelines 评估沿海湿地和有生命的海岸线所提供的现在和未来的利益
Pub Date : 2025-06-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100243
Donna Marie Bilkovic , Andrew M. Scheld , Robert Isdell , Pamela Mason , Sarah Stafford , Molly Mitchell , Cirse Gonzalez-Dorantes , Randolph Chambers , Matthias Leu , Susanna Musick , Sean Gregory , Jessica Hendricks , Oluwakemi Dada , Gabriel Benson
Marshes are important natural capital assets for many coastal communities, providing a range of ecosystem services such as coastal protection, nutrient removal, habitat, and recreational opportunities. We explored the present and future distribution and economic value of tidal marsh (natural marsh and living shorelines) ecosystem services for coastal communities in Virginia, US, using an interdisciplinary mixed-methods, spatially explicit valuation approach. First, a benefit transfer analysis was conducted using literature-derived values adjusted for site-specific conditions. Then, two stated preference surveys were implemented, targeting recreational users and individuals engaged in shoreline management decision-making. We leveraged a wide range of spatial information on the local environment to both adjust values and also develop realistic scenarios in surveys. Survey responses were used to assess service values as well as tradeoffs in shoreline decisions. Marsh values were found to be a significant asset for communities, amounting to ∼$90M/yr in benefits, or 3.3 % of annual GDP for the region. Assuming marsh migration into undeveloped lands and the installation of living shorelines for coastal protection where suitable, future discounted service values were predicted to increase slightly. Marsh service values varied spatially, with storm risk reduction (the highest ranked service by community decision-makers) displaying the greatest variation. Recreational opportunities were ranked low by community decision-makers, yet recreational fishers placed a high value on marshes. This highlights that without consideration of locally important services, shoreline management decisions may unknowingly affect local economies. Valuing marsh services can improve social efficiency in shoreline management decisions while also advancing natural capital accounting.
沼泽是许多沿海社区重要的自然资本资产,提供了一系列生态系统服务,如海岸保护、养分去除、栖息地和娱乐机会。我们利用跨学科混合方法、空间明确的评估方法,探索了美国弗吉尼亚州沿海社区潮汐沼泽(天然沼泽和活海岸线)生态系统服务的现在和未来分布和经济价值。首先,利用根据具体情况调整的文献推导值进行了利益转移分析。然后,针对休闲用户和参与海岸线管理决策的个人进行了两次声明偏好调查。我们利用当地环境的广泛空间信息来调整数值,并在调查中开发现实场景。调查结果被用来评估服务价值以及海岸线决策中的权衡。研究发现,Marsh价值是社区的一项重要资产,每年可带来约9000万美元的收益,占该地区年GDP的3.3%。假设沼泽迁移到未开发的土地,并在适当的情况下为海岸保护设置活的海岸线,预计未来的贴现服务价值将略有增加。湿地服务价值在空间上存在差异,减少风暴风险(社区决策者排名最高的服务)表现出最大的变化。社区决策者对休闲机会的评价很低,但休闲渔民对湿地的评价很高。这突出表明,如果不考虑当地重要的服务,海岸线管理决策可能会在不知不觉中影响当地经济。对沼泽服务进行评估可以提高岸线管理决策的社会效率,同时也可以推进自然资本核算。
{"title":"Valuing present and future benefits provided by coastal wetlands and living shorelines","authors":"Donna Marie Bilkovic ,&nbsp;Andrew M. Scheld ,&nbsp;Robert Isdell ,&nbsp;Pamela Mason ,&nbsp;Sarah Stafford ,&nbsp;Molly Mitchell ,&nbsp;Cirse Gonzalez-Dorantes ,&nbsp;Randolph Chambers ,&nbsp;Matthias Leu ,&nbsp;Susanna Musick ,&nbsp;Sean Gregory ,&nbsp;Jessica Hendricks ,&nbsp;Oluwakemi Dada ,&nbsp;Gabriel Benson","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100243","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100243","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Marshes are important natural capital assets for many coastal communities, providing a range of ecosystem services such as coastal protection, nutrient removal, habitat, and recreational opportunities. We explored the present and future distribution and economic value of tidal marsh (natural marsh and living shorelines) ecosystem services for coastal communities in Virginia, US, using an interdisciplinary mixed-methods, spatially explicit valuation approach. First, a benefit transfer analysis was conducted using literature-derived values adjusted for site-specific conditions. Then, two stated preference surveys were implemented, targeting recreational users and individuals engaged in shoreline management decision-making. We leveraged a wide range of spatial information on the local environment to both adjust values and also develop realistic scenarios in surveys. Survey responses were used to assess service values as well as tradeoffs in shoreline decisions. Marsh values were found to be a significant asset for communities, amounting to ∼$90M/yr in benefits, or 3.3 % of annual GDP for the region. Assuming marsh migration into undeveloped lands and the installation of living shorelines for coastal protection where suitable, future discounted service values were predicted to increase slightly. Marsh service values varied spatially, with storm risk reduction (the highest ranked service by community decision-makers) displaying the greatest variation. Recreational opportunities were ranked low by community decision-makers, yet recreational fishers placed a high value on marshes. This highlights that without consideration of locally important services, shoreline management decisions may unknowingly affect local economies. Valuing marsh services can improve social efficiency in shoreline management decisions while also advancing natural capital accounting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144271526","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mapping multiple benefits in large-scale freshwater restoration: A theory of change approach 大规模淡水恢复的多重利益映射:一种变化理论方法
Pub Date : 2025-06-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100240
Laura Pott , Yaron Hershkovitz , Sebastian Birk
The study explores the application of a Theory of Change (ToC) framework in 18 large-scale freshwater restoration projects within the context of the European Green Deal and the recently adopted Nature Restoration Regulation. By leveraging a participatory approach, the research examines the effects of freshwater restoration measures across three ecosystem clusters: peatlands and wetlands, small streams, and large rivers. In a conceptual model, restoration measures were connected with transdisciplinary goals, assessing biophysical, social and economic outcomes. The findings highlight the effectiveness of Nature-based Solutions in advancing climate resilience, biodiversity gains, and social equity while identifying potential trade-offs and negative effects. The ToC framework proved valuable in guiding restoration planning, facilitating stakeholder engagement, and enabling adaptive management in accordance with the Nature Restoration Regulation’s requirements. However, the study underscores the need for clearly defined quantitative targets to enhance systematic monitoring and evaluation, ensuring full and sustainable alignment with broader European objectives.
该研究在《欧洲绿色协议》和最近通过的《自然恢复条例》的背景下,探讨了变化理论框架在18个大型淡水恢复项目中的应用。通过利用参与式方法,该研究考察了淡水恢复措施对三个生态系统集群的影响:泥炭地和湿地、小河和大河。在概念模型中,恢复措施与跨学科目标相关联,评估生物物理、社会和经济成果。研究结果强调了基于自然的解决方案在促进气候适应能力、生物多样性增加和社会公平方面的有效性,同时确定了潜在的权衡和负面影响。事实证明,ToC框架在指导恢复规划、促进利益相关者参与和实现符合《自然恢复条例》要求的适应性管理方面具有重要价值。然而,该研究强调需要明确定义的量化目标,以加强系统的监测和评估,确保与更广泛的欧洲目标充分和可持续地保持一致。
{"title":"Mapping multiple benefits in large-scale freshwater restoration: A theory of change approach","authors":"Laura Pott ,&nbsp;Yaron Hershkovitz ,&nbsp;Sebastian Birk","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100240","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100240","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study explores the application of a Theory of Change (ToC) framework in 18 large-scale freshwater restoration projects within the context of the European Green Deal and the recently adopted Nature Restoration Regulation. By leveraging a participatory approach, the research examines the effects of freshwater restoration measures across three ecosystem clusters: peatlands and wetlands, small streams, and large rivers. In a conceptual model, restoration measures were connected with transdisciplinary goals, assessing biophysical, social and economic outcomes. The findings highlight the effectiveness of Nature-based Solutions in advancing climate resilience, biodiversity gains, and social equity while identifying potential trade-offs and negative effects. The ToC framework proved valuable in guiding restoration planning, facilitating stakeholder engagement, and enabling adaptive management in accordance with the Nature Restoration Regulation’s requirements. However, the study underscores the need for clearly defined quantitative targets to enhance systematic monitoring and evaluation, ensuring full and sustainable alignment with broader European objectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144321596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
“Spongetown” Christiania as an urban living lab: Nature-based solutions for resilient, circular, symbiotic, and regenerative transitions in urban waters “海绵镇”克里斯蒂安尼亚作为城市生活实验室:基于自然的解决方案,用于城市水域的弹性、循环、共生和再生过渡
Pub Date : 2025-06-06 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100237
Manuel Higgs Morgado , Despoina Vasiliki Vastardi , Flore-Eva Baudot Almeida , Hanaa Dahy
Rising sea levels and stormwater flooding threaten coastal ecosystems like wetlands, exacerbating urban sustainability challenges. Urban Living Labs and NBS propose decentralised, community-driven approaches emphasising resilience, circularity, symbiosis, and regeneration. This study examines Freetown Christiania, a pioneering community-led urban laboratory and countercultural enclave within Copenhagen’s socio-technical-ecological systems, as they pursue SDGs within planetary boundaries. We analyse Christiania’s urban niche using participatory observation and sociotechnical frameworks—including Actor-network Theory, the Multi-Level Perspective, and Sociotechnical Imaginaries. We investigate NBS innovations, such as reed bed systems, constructed wetlands, green roofs, and green-blue infrastructure, which exemplify Christiania’s integrated urban water management—innovations reshaping Copenhagen’s grey infrastructure path dependency, driven by Danish agendas and Sino-European sponge city partnerships.
Identifying key actors, drivers, barriers, and scenarios, our thematic analysis codes problems, interests, and strategies to articulate a proposal for expanding Christiania’s NBS niches through urban planning and governance. Findings highlight Christiania’s contributions to NBS in wastewater treatment, habitat preservation, biodiversity monitoring, and sustainability ideology. The Freetown bridges community-led innovations with municipal and international strategies, positioning itself as a potential pilot for further integrating socio-technical, techno-economic, socio-ecological, and institutional design approaches to urban and coastal sustainability.
We propose a replicable multi-criteria methodology for territorial transitions in Copenhagen, the Baltic, and globally. Based upon IUCN and DGNB standards, we outline criteria for urban NBS proposals developed with Christiania’s Building Office and local stakeholders. These criteria inform scenario planning in our project, “Spongetown Christiania,” forecasting trajectories and pathways for local governance of infrastructure, urban renewal and development.
海平面上升和暴雨洪水威胁着湿地等沿海生态系统,加剧了城市可持续性的挑战。城市生活实验室和NBS提出了分散的、社区驱动的方法,强调弹性、循环、共生和再生。本研究考察了弗里敦克里斯蒂安尼亚,这是一个开创性的社区主导的城市实验室,也是哥本哈根社会技术生态系统中的反文化飞地,因为他们在地球范围内追求可持续发展目标。我们使用参与式观察和社会技术框架(包括行动者网络理论、多层次视角和社会技术想象)来分析克里斯蒂安尼亚的城市生态位。我们研究了NBS创新,如芦苇床系统、人工湿地、绿色屋顶和绿蓝基础设施,这些创新体现了克里斯蒂亚尼亚的综合城市水管理创新,在丹麦议程和中欧海绵城市合作伙伴关系的推动下,重塑了哥本哈根的灰色基础设施路径依赖。我们的专题分析确定了关键因素、驱动因素、障碍和情景,对问题、利益和策略进行了编码,以阐明通过城市规划和治理扩大克里斯蒂安尼亚国家统计局利基的建议。研究结果强调了Christiania在废水处理、栖息地保护、生物多样性监测和可持续发展思想方面对国家统计局的贡献。弗里敦将社区主导的创新与市政和国际战略相结合,将自己定位为进一步整合社会技术、技术经济、社会生态和制度设计方法的潜在试点,以实现城市和沿海的可持续性。我们为哥本哈根、波罗的海和全球的领土过渡提出了一种可复制的多标准方法。根据IUCN和DGNB的标准,我们概述了与Christiania建筑办公室和当地利益相关者共同制定的城市NBS提案的标准。这些标准为我们的项目“Spongetown Christiania”中的情景规划提供了信息,预测了基础设施、城市更新和发展的地方治理的轨迹和途径。
{"title":"“Spongetown” Christiania as an urban living lab: Nature-based solutions for resilient, circular, symbiotic, and regenerative transitions in urban waters","authors":"Manuel Higgs Morgado ,&nbsp;Despoina Vasiliki Vastardi ,&nbsp;Flore-Eva Baudot Almeida ,&nbsp;Hanaa Dahy","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100237","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100237","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rising sea levels and stormwater flooding threaten coastal ecosystems like wetlands, exacerbating urban sustainability challenges. Urban Living Labs and NBS propose decentralised, community-driven approaches emphasising <em>resilience, circularity, symbiosis</em>, and <em>regeneration</em>. This study examines Freetown Christiania, a pioneering community-led urban laboratory and countercultural enclave within Copenhagen’s socio-technical-ecological systems, as they pursue SDGs within planetary boundaries. We analyse Christiania’s urban <em>niche</em> using participatory observation and <em>sociotechnical</em> frameworks—including <em>Actor-network Theory</em>, the <em>Multi-Level Perspective</em>, and <em>Sociotechnical Imaginaries</em>. We investigate NBS innovations, such as reed bed systems, constructed wetlands, green roofs, and green-blue infrastructure, which exemplify Christiania’s integrated urban water management—innovations reshaping Copenhagen’s grey infrastructure path dependency, driven by Danish agendas and Sino-European sponge city partnerships.</div><div>Identifying key actors, drivers, barriers, and scenarios, our thematic analysis codes problems, interests, and strategies to articulate a proposal for expanding Christiania’s NBS niches through urban planning and governance. Findings highlight Christiania’s contributions to NBS in wastewater treatment, habitat preservation, biodiversity monitoring, and sustainability ideology. The <em>Freetown</em> bridges community-led innovations with municipal and international strategies, positioning itself as a potential pilot for further integrating socio-technical<em>,</em> techno-economic, socio-ecological, and institutional design approaches to urban and coastal sustainability.</div><div>We propose a replicable multi-criteria methodology for territorial transitions in Copenhagen, the Baltic, and globally. Based upon IUCN and DGNB standards, we outline criteria for urban NBS proposals developed with Christiania’s Building Office and local stakeholders. These criteria inform scenario planning in our project, “Spongetown Christiania,” forecasting trajectories and pathways for local governance of infrastructure, urban renewal and development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100237"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144502050","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Quantifying and valuing forests as a nature-based solution for ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction: A systematic review 量化和评估森林作为基于自然的解决方案以减少基于生态系统的灾害风险:系统回顾
Pub Date : 2025-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100242
Elham Ashrafizadeh, Rasoul Yousefpour
Forests play a significant role in mitigating natural hazards and are increasingly recognized as nature-based solutions (NBS) for ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction (Eco-DRR). However, their protective effects remain under-quantified, limiting their integration into mainstream risk management practices.
This systematic review investigates the current state of quantitative and monetary assessments of forests as Eco-DRR measures. To this end, we focused exclusively on studies reporting quantitative outcomes for forests across a broad range of gravitational and hydroclimatic hazards. The review aims to: 1) provide a comprehensive overview of the concepts and methodologies used to quantify the protective effects of forests; 2) summarize and analyze quantitative evidence and its variation across forest types, methodologies and hazard types; 3) identify research gaps; and 4) synthesize a conceptual framework to facilitate further research.
We screened 3568 papers, from which 77 studies were selected, comprising 155 data points. Drawing on the insights from these studies, we developed a conceptual framework to guide future research in this field. Methodologies for the quantification of protective effects were categorized into three main groups: hazard-based, risk-based, and economic valuation methods, with hazard-based approaches being the most frequently applied, followed by economic valuation. Reported monetary values for forest protective effects varied significantly, ranging from less than 1 USD to over 41,000 USD per hectare per year. We investigated potential sources of this variation, including forest type, hazard type, and the methodologies employed.
Our findings underscore the need for more robust hazard models tailored to specific hazard types that integrate forest characteristics, climate change impacts, and post-disturbance forest recovery. We emphasize the importance of applying risk-based methods when evaluating the protective effect of forests. To this end, the review provides a framework to guide future efforts and support the integration of forests into disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation strategies.
森林在减轻自然灾害方面发挥着重要作用,并日益被认为是基于自然的解决方案,以实现基于生态系统的灾害风险减少。然而,它们的保护作用仍然没有得到充分的量化,限制了它们融入主流风险管理实践。本系统综述调查了作为生态减灾措施的森林数量和货币评估的现状。为此,我们专注于报告森林在广泛的重力和水文气候灾害中的定量结果的研究。审查的目的是:1)提供用于量化森林保护作用的概念和方法的全面概述;2)总结和分析定量证据及其在森林类型、方法和灾害类型之间的差异;3)识别研究空白;4)综合一个概念框架,以便于进一步的研究。我们筛选了3568篇论文,从中选择了77项研究,包括155个数据点。根据这些研究的见解,我们开发了一个概念框架来指导该领域的未来研究。用于量化保护效果的方法主要分为三大类:基于危害、基于风险和经济评价方法,其中基于危害的方法是最常用的,其次是经济评价。报告的森林保护效果的货币价值差异很大,从每年每公顷不到1美元到超过41,000美元不等。我们调查了这种变化的潜在来源,包括森林类型、危害类型和采用的方法。我们的研究结果强调,需要针对具体的灾害类型建立更强大的灾害模型,将森林特征、气候变化影响和干扰后的森林恢复结合起来。我们强调在评价森林的保护作用时采用基于风险的方法的重要性。为此,审查提供了一个框架,指导未来的努力,并支持将森林纳入减少灾害风险和气候适应战略。
{"title":"Quantifying and valuing forests as a nature-based solution for ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction: A systematic review","authors":"Elham Ashrafizadeh,&nbsp;Rasoul Yousefpour","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100242","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100242","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forests play a significant role in mitigating natural hazards and are increasingly recognized as nature-based solutions (NBS) for ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction (Eco-DRR). However, their protective effects remain under-quantified, limiting their integration into mainstream risk management practices.</div><div>This systematic review investigates the current state of quantitative and monetary assessments of forests as Eco-DRR measures. To this end, we focused exclusively on studies reporting quantitative outcomes for forests across a broad range of gravitational and hydroclimatic hazards. The review aims to: 1) provide a comprehensive overview of the concepts and methodologies used to quantify the protective effects of forests; 2) summarize and analyze quantitative evidence and its variation across forest types, methodologies and hazard types; 3) identify research gaps; and 4) synthesize a conceptual framework to facilitate further research.</div><div>We screened 3568 papers, from which 77 studies were selected, comprising 155 data points. Drawing on the insights from these studies, we developed a conceptual framework to guide future research in this field. Methodologies for the quantification of protective effects were categorized into three main groups: hazard-based, risk-based, and economic valuation methods, with hazard-based approaches being the most frequently applied, followed by economic valuation. Reported monetary values for forest protective effects varied significantly, ranging from less than 1 USD to over 41,000 USD per hectare per year. We investigated potential sources of this variation, including forest type, hazard type, and the methodologies employed.</div><div>Our findings underscore the need for more robust hazard models tailored to specific hazard types that integrate forest characteristics, climate change impacts, and post-disturbance forest recovery. We emphasize the importance of applying risk-based methods when evaluating the protective effect of forests. To this end, the review provides a framework to guide future efforts and support the integration of forests into disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144263086","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transformative nature-based urban and architectural design values for socio-ecological wellbeing and adaptation in New Caledonia 新喀里多尼亚以自然为基础的城市和建筑设计价值,以促进社会生态健康和适应
Pub Date : 2025-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100239
Amanda Yates , Maibritt Pedersen Zari , Qatrenë Juni
Working with nature in urban settings as a strategy for improving wellbeing offers significant potential for effective climate change adaptation. It is increasingly being explored and utilized in the region of Moananui Oceania. In New Caledonia, ongoing social issues pervade many aspects of life, particularly for Indigenous Kanak peoples, including the appropriateness and effectiveness of housing and the urban built environment in general. This paper examines and suggests eco-relational practices for urban and architectural design in a New Caledonian context. To explore transformative nature-based built environment design agendas that link closely to Indigenous ecological knowledge and understandings of wellbeing, research was carried out through a series of interviews and workshops with local people. We examine the usefulness of starting from understanding worldview, local notions of wellbeing, and relationships to nature in urban climate change adaptation work, and suggest a conceptual framework for transformative built environment design practice. We discuss using the Mauri Ora compass research co-design methodologies to bridge cultural differences, political agendas, and varying worldviews and encourage meaningful engagement with eco-centric local and/or Indigenous communities. Key findings include that the communities engaged with, who are largely Kanak, see that fundamental changes must occur in the design and construction of built environments, and that the nature of the changes is not just technical, but fundamentally requires a cultural shift in how people understand themselves to be in and of the living world. The necessary shift, particularly for non-indigenous, was identified as a collective rather than individual reorientation towards a more care-full, respectful, and ecologically regenerative relationship with living socio-ecological systems.
在城市环境中与自然合作,作为改善福祉的战略,为有效适应气候变化提供了巨大的潜力。在大洋洲莫阿纳努伊地区正越来越多地对其进行探索和利用。在新喀里多尼亚,持续存在的社会问题遍及生活的许多方面,特别是土著卡纳克人民,包括住房的适当性和有效性以及一般的城市建筑环境。本文研究并建议在新喀里多尼亚的背景下进行城市和建筑设计的生态关系实践。为了探索与土著生态知识和对福祉的理解密切相关的基于自然的建筑环境设计议程,通过与当地人的一系列访谈和研讨会进行了研究。我们研究了在城市气候变化适应工作中从理解世界观、当地的幸福观念以及与自然的关系开始的有用性,并提出了一个转型建筑环境设计实践的概念框架。我们讨论了使用毛里奥拉指南针研究协同设计方法来弥合文化差异、政治议程和不同的世界观,并鼓励与以生态为中心的当地和/或土著社区进行有意义的接触。主要发现包括参与的社区(主要是卡纳克人)认为,建筑环境的设计和建造必须发生根本性的变化,这种变化的本质不仅仅是技术上的,而是从根本上要求人们如何理解自己在生活世界中的文化转变。必要的转变,特别是对非土著居民来说,被确定为集体而不是个人的重新定位,以与生活的社会生态系统建立更谨慎、更尊重和生态再生的关系。
{"title":"Transformative nature-based urban and architectural design values for socio-ecological wellbeing and adaptation in New Caledonia","authors":"Amanda Yates ,&nbsp;Maibritt Pedersen Zari ,&nbsp;Qatrenë Juni","doi":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100239","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.nbsj.2025.100239","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Working with nature in urban settings as a strategy for improving wellbeing offers significant potential for effective climate change adaptation. It is increasingly being explored and utilized in the region of <em>Moananui</em> Oceania. In New Caledonia, ongoing social issues pervade many aspects of life, particularly for Indigenous Kanak peoples, including the appropriateness and effectiveness of housing and the urban built environment in general. This paper examines and suggests eco-relational practices for urban and architectural design in a New Caledonian context. To explore transformative nature-based built environment design agendas that link closely to Indigenous ecological knowledge and understandings of wellbeing, research was carried out through a series of interviews and workshops with local people. We examine the usefulness of starting from understanding worldview, local notions of wellbeing, and relationships to nature in urban climate change adaptation work, and suggest a conceptual framework for transformative built environment design practice. We discuss using the Mauri Ora compass research co-design methodologies to bridge cultural differences, political agendas, and varying worldviews and encourage meaningful engagement with eco-centric local and/or Indigenous communities. Key findings include that the communities engaged with, who are largely Kanak, see that fundamental changes must occur in the design and construction of built environments, and that the nature of the changes is not just technical, but fundamentally requires a cultural shift in how people understand themselves to be in and of the living world. The necessary shift, particularly for non-indigenous, was identified as a collective rather than individual reorientation towards a more care-full, respectful, and ecologically regenerative relationship with living socio-ecological systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100945,"journal":{"name":"Nature-Based Solutions","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144230007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Nature-Based Solutions
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1