Case:Washburn v. Kingsborough Community College et al., No. 20-cv-0395 (E.D. N.Y. 03/29/23)
Ruling: The US District Court, Eastern District of New York, dismissed a claim in a suit against Kingsborough Community College.
Significance: The Americans with Disabilities Act defines disability as a physical or mental impairment substantially limiting one or more of the major life activities, a record of such an impairment, or being regarded as having such an impairment.
Summary: The plaintiff was a transgender KCC professor who filed a suit, and one of the claims was discrimination in violation of the ADA. The plaintiff claimed a qualifying disability because of gender dysphoria, physical limitations, a significant amount of which were due to gender-confirming surgery, and “other physical and mental impairments.”
The suit alleged that the provost and the department chair had discriminated by rejecting grants, disapproving of a “long-standing teaching arrangement” with Hunter College, preventing a transfer to another CUNY college, switching courses and course times, reducing program benefits, denying access to essential records, removing an administrative assistant, “misgendering” the plaintiff on several occasions, refusing to change the plaintiff's name and gender on Kingsborough records, and moving the plaintiff's office to a moldy storage closet. Kingsborough filed a motion to dismiss.
The district court judge said that there wasn't any indication of a disability within the meaning of ADA because the allegations contradicted any notion of a major life activity impairment since the plaintiff purportedly taught classes, spoke at colleges all over the country, and drafted both an op-ed article and an unspecified public petition. She dismissed the claim.
案件:Washburn诉Kingsborough Community College et al, No. 20-cv-0395 (E.D. N.Y. 03/29/23)判决:纽约东区美国地方法院驳回了对Kingsborough Community College的诉讼请求。意义:《美国残疾人法案》将残疾定义为严重限制一项或多项主要生活活动的身体或精神缺陷,有这种缺陷的记录,或被认为有这种缺陷。摘要:原告是一名跨性别的KCC教授,他提起了诉讼,其中一项指控是违反《美国残疾人法》的歧视。原告声称,由于性别焦虑、身体限制(其中很大一部分是由于性别确认手术造成的)以及“其他身体和精神损伤”,她的残疾符合条件。诉讼称,教务长和系主任存在歧视,包括拒绝拨款、不同意与亨特学院的“长期教学安排”、阻止学生转到纽约市立大学的另一所学院、转换课程和课程时间、减少项目福利、拒绝查看重要记录、解雇一名行政助理、多次“错定”原告、拒绝更改原告在金士伯勒记录上的姓名和性别。把原告的办公室搬到一个发霉的储物间。金斯堡提出了驳回动议。地方法院法官说,在《美国残疾人法》的意义上,没有任何残疾的迹象,因为这些指控与任何关于重大生活活动障碍的概念相矛盾,因为原告据称在全国各地的大学授课,演讲,并起草了一篇专栏文章和一份未指明的公开请愿书。她驳回了这一指控。
{"title":"Washburn v. Kingsborough Community College et al.","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/dch.70018","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dch.70018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Case:</b> <i>Washburn v. Kingsborough Community College et al</i>., No. 20-cv-0395 (E.D. N.Y. 03/29/23)</p><p><b>Ruling:</b> The US District Court, Eastern District of New York, dismissed a claim in a suit against Kingsborough Community College.</p><p><b>Significance:</b> The Americans with Disabilities Act defines disability as a physical or mental impairment substantially limiting one or more of the major life activities, a record of such an impairment, or being regarded as having such an impairment.</p><p><b>Summary:</b> The plaintiff was a transgender KCC professor who filed a suit, and one of the claims was discrimination in violation of the ADA. The plaintiff claimed a qualifying disability because of gender dysphoria, physical limitations, a significant amount of which were due to gender-confirming surgery, and “other physical and mental impairments.”</p><p>The suit alleged that the provost and the department chair had discriminated by rejecting grants, disapproving of a “long-standing teaching arrangement” with Hunter College, preventing a transfer to another CUNY college, switching courses and course times, reducing program benefits, denying access to essential records, removing an administrative assistant, “misgendering” the plaintiff on several occasions, refusing to change the plaintiff's name and gender on Kingsborough records, and moving the plaintiff's office to a moldy storage closet. Kingsborough filed a motion to dismiss.</p><p>The district court judge said that there wasn't any indication of a disability within the meaning of ADA because the allegations contradicted any notion of a major life activity impairment since the plaintiff purportedly taught classes, spoke at colleges all over the country, and drafted both an op-ed article and an unspecified public petition. She dismissed the claim.</p>","PeriodicalId":101228,"journal":{"name":"The Department Chair","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dch.70018","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146136562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>The glow of screens in the classroom is as familiar as the rustle of turning pages in previous decades. But something new has emerged. Generative AI (GenAI) is forcing instructors to reconsider the tried-and-true formats for course materials, engagement activities, and assessments. For administrators, this requires proactive leadership to guide faculty through this significant shift, with particular attention to faculty workload and developing necessary GenAI competencies.</p><p>The inevitable integration of GenAI into the educational landscape compels adaptation. As we revisit core aspects of our teaching practice, light will shine on areas where our expertise does not yet align with the capabilities and implications of this technology. This raises a question for careful consideration: Can traditional professional development frameworks empower us to engage with such a disruptive and transformative force?</p><p>Often faculty professional development is a one-size-fits-all approach, and it's easy to revert to the passive one-direction information flow and subsequent overreliance on slide decks. These development opportunities are frequently led internally, but they fail to effectively leverage internal expertise to its full potential. Just as sustainability education emphasizes the critical role of knowledge brokers in connecting diverse stakeholders and translating complex information into actionable insights, a similar approach holds promise for empowering faculty in the age of GenAI.</p><p>In this context, knowledge brokerage within professional development is a dynamic process of connection, facilitation, and linking. This involves bringing together faculty with diverse experiences and needs related to GenAI, facilitating the sharing of insights and best practices in GenAI use in curriculum design and teaching, and linking individuals with specific resources and expertise (within the institution and beyond) that can address their learning gaps and pedagogical challenges. Grounded in building pathways and relationships, not simply disseminating information, this can bridge the gap between the emerging educational research and practice and connect those facing similar challenges, making the professional development responsive and relevant (see figure 1). Participants should ideally leave the development opportunity with increased confidence, deeper knowledge, an expanded personal learning network, and a foundation for an agile approach to GenAI in teaching and learning.</p><p>These examples show how knowledge brokerage moves beyond workshops and into shared discovery and community-driven solutions to this emerging issue in higher education.</p><p>This collaborative and responsive approach warrants evaluation, with the potential to yield more impactful and relevant professional development opportunities that build community and challenge silos, ultimately increasing the pace of adoption of innovative practices in using GenAI in higher educati
{"title":"Build Bridges, Not Decks: Using Knowledge Brokerage to Inform Faculty Professional Development","authors":"Emily Faulconer","doi":"10.1002/dch.70005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dch.70005","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The glow of screens in the classroom is as familiar as the rustle of turning pages in previous decades. But something new has emerged. Generative AI (GenAI) is forcing instructors to reconsider the tried-and-true formats for course materials, engagement activities, and assessments. For administrators, this requires proactive leadership to guide faculty through this significant shift, with particular attention to faculty workload and developing necessary GenAI competencies.</p><p>The inevitable integration of GenAI into the educational landscape compels adaptation. As we revisit core aspects of our teaching practice, light will shine on areas where our expertise does not yet align with the capabilities and implications of this technology. This raises a question for careful consideration: Can traditional professional development frameworks empower us to engage with such a disruptive and transformative force?</p><p>Often faculty professional development is a one-size-fits-all approach, and it's easy to revert to the passive one-direction information flow and subsequent overreliance on slide decks. These development opportunities are frequently led internally, but they fail to effectively leverage internal expertise to its full potential. Just as sustainability education emphasizes the critical role of knowledge brokers in connecting diverse stakeholders and translating complex information into actionable insights, a similar approach holds promise for empowering faculty in the age of GenAI.</p><p>In this context, knowledge brokerage within professional development is a dynamic process of connection, facilitation, and linking. This involves bringing together faculty with diverse experiences and needs related to GenAI, facilitating the sharing of insights and best practices in GenAI use in curriculum design and teaching, and linking individuals with specific resources and expertise (within the institution and beyond) that can address their learning gaps and pedagogical challenges. Grounded in building pathways and relationships, not simply disseminating information, this can bridge the gap between the emerging educational research and practice and connect those facing similar challenges, making the professional development responsive and relevant (see figure 1). Participants should ideally leave the development opportunity with increased confidence, deeper knowledge, an expanded personal learning network, and a foundation for an agile approach to GenAI in teaching and learning.</p><p>These examples show how knowledge brokerage moves beyond workshops and into shared discovery and community-driven solutions to this emerging issue in higher education.</p><p>This collaborative and responsive approach warrants evaluation, with the potential to yield more impactful and relevant professional development opportunities that build community and challenge silos, ultimately increasing the pace of adoption of innovative practices in using GenAI in higher educati","PeriodicalId":101228,"journal":{"name":"The Department Chair","volume":"36 3","pages":"7-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dch.70005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146139201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Access to higher education through online learning platforms at colleges and universities has grown significantly over the past decade, enabling educational opportunities for both students and faculty. In addition, the online delivery of courses has given students great flexibility in learning and pursuing degrees while also increasing flexibility for online instructors. This is especially true in relation to teaching schedules and the ability to reach a more diverse and global student audience. Although online education offers flexibility and accessibility within the higher education realm, institutions face persistent concerns about student retention. Students who primarily study online often face many struggles related to academic preparedness, motivation, and feelings of isolation, all of which can lead to higher drop, fail, and withdrawal rates. Challenges such as these compel colleges and universities to explore innovative strategies to support student success and persistence. This article argues for the strategic integration of academic coaches as a useful tool and approach to enhance student retention in online classes. It also emphasizes the importance of addressing work-life balance for online instructors whose demanding roles require effective self-management and institutional support.</p><p>However, despite these efforts, student retention remains a concern, highlighting the need for innovative solutions.</p><p>An innovative solution may lie in the simple form of human connection through academic coaches. When an academic coach works alongside students in the online course, it helps them engage in and connect to the course material, making them feel seen and heard. A human connection can make all the difference for students.</p><p>Academic coaching is a powerful tool for enhancing student retention and success in online learning environments. By providing personalized support, academic coaches address the diverse challenges that students face, which are significant factors in student attrition. This proactive support fosters student engagement, promotes a sense of belonging, and cultivates a positive learning environment, ultimately increasing persistence and improving overall academic performance. Crucially, academic coaching establishes human-to-human connections that cannot be replicated by AI, as they involve empathy, personalized interaction, and the development of meaningful relationships, which are vital for student motivation and support.</p><p>The University of Texas at Arlington (UTA) College of Nursing and Health Innovation (CONHI), in collaboration with Academic Partnerships, implemented an online RN-to-BSN program in 2008 to provide flexibility for working RNs seeking to further their education. This program, referred to as the accelerated online (AO) program, uses academic coaches to support student learning and engagement. Academic coaches in the UTA CONHI's AO program are required to have a minimum of a master's deg
{"title":"Enhancing Online Learning Using Academic Coaches for Retention, Student Success, and Instructor Well-Being","authors":"Jacquelyn Cato, Harriet Watkins","doi":"10.1002/dch.70010","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dch.70010","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Access to higher education through online learning platforms at colleges and universities has grown significantly over the past decade, enabling educational opportunities for both students and faculty. In addition, the online delivery of courses has given students great flexibility in learning and pursuing degrees while also increasing flexibility for online instructors. This is especially true in relation to teaching schedules and the ability to reach a more diverse and global student audience. Although online education offers flexibility and accessibility within the higher education realm, institutions face persistent concerns about student retention. Students who primarily study online often face many struggles related to academic preparedness, motivation, and feelings of isolation, all of which can lead to higher drop, fail, and withdrawal rates. Challenges such as these compel colleges and universities to explore innovative strategies to support student success and persistence. This article argues for the strategic integration of academic coaches as a useful tool and approach to enhance student retention in online classes. It also emphasizes the importance of addressing work-life balance for online instructors whose demanding roles require effective self-management and institutional support.</p><p>However, despite these efforts, student retention remains a concern, highlighting the need for innovative solutions.</p><p>An innovative solution may lie in the simple form of human connection through academic coaches. When an academic coach works alongside students in the online course, it helps them engage in and connect to the course material, making them feel seen and heard. A human connection can make all the difference for students.</p><p>Academic coaching is a powerful tool for enhancing student retention and success in online learning environments. By providing personalized support, academic coaches address the diverse challenges that students face, which are significant factors in student attrition. This proactive support fosters student engagement, promotes a sense of belonging, and cultivates a positive learning environment, ultimately increasing persistence and improving overall academic performance. Crucially, academic coaching establishes human-to-human connections that cannot be replicated by AI, as they involve empathy, personalized interaction, and the development of meaningful relationships, which are vital for student motivation and support.</p><p>The University of Texas at Arlington (UTA) College of Nursing and Health Innovation (CONHI), in collaboration with Academic Partnerships, implemented an online RN-to-BSN program in 2008 to provide flexibility for working RNs seeking to further their education. This program, referred to as the accelerated online (AO) program, uses academic coaches to support student learning and engagement. Academic coaches in the UTA CONHI's AO program are required to have a minimum of a master's deg","PeriodicalId":101228,"journal":{"name":"The Department Chair","volume":"36 3","pages":"20-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dch.70010","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146139200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Adjunct instructors are essential to higher education because they provide critical instructional support, offer industry experience, and help reduce institutions' expenses. According to an American Association of University Professors' report, approximately 48 percent of faculty members in US colleges and universities were employed part time in fall 2021 (Colby <span>2023</span>, 2). As a result, one of the roles for a department chair has become to foster an adjunct culture that is rewarding, inclusive, communicative, and fair, despite institutional limitations. We present two perspectives for best practices in hiring and retaining adjunct instructors.</p><p>Manyiu Tse is in his sixth year as chair of the mathematics and computer science department at Molloy University. Molloy is a medium-size Roman Catholic university located in Rockville Centre, New York. Approximately 72 percent of the faculty at Molloy are adjuncts. His department offers, on average, 70 to 100 sections per academic year. These sections are taught by 6 full-time faculty (including the chair) and between 14 and 16 adjunct instructors.</p><p>Evelina Lapierre is in her seventh year as chair of the mathematics department at Johnson & Wales University (JWU) at the Providence campus. JWU is a medium-size private teaching-focused university with two campuses: one in Providence, Rhode Island, and the other in Charlotte, North Carolina. Approximately 48 percent of the faculty at JWU are adjuncts. The Providence mathematics department offers between 100 and 110 sections per academic year. These sections are taught by 5 full-time faculty (including the chair), 4 lecturers, and between 8 and 11 adjunct instructors.</p><p>Searching for and hiring adjuncts is different from searching for and hiring full-time faculty members, since there is more emphasis on teaching and less on research and university service. At Molloy, most math adjuncts are either retired high school teachers or recent graduates with a master's degree. Molloy has an extensive network of local math educators to draw from. Adjuncts also come from other departments at Molloy, alumni, and referrals from colleagues.</p><p>The math department at JWU keeps their online application perpetually open because they hire year-round. Final year graduate students or newly awarded master's degree students from local research universities can make great candidates. JWU also uses adjuncts and full-time faculty from other departments on campus (science, social sciences, and business).</p><p>It is important that newly hired adjuncts go through proper onboarding and mentoring to ensure that they feel welcomed in the role and understand the expectations. The Faculty Professional Center at Molloy holds a new faculty orientation before the start of the academic year. New faculty gain access to resources and support services that include technical support and professional development. The chair gives adjuncts a campus tour and provides t
{"title":"A Chair's Guide to Adjuncts","authors":"Manyiu Tse, Evelina Lapierre","doi":"10.1002/dch.70014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dch.70014","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Adjunct instructors are essential to higher education because they provide critical instructional support, offer industry experience, and help reduce institutions' expenses. According to an American Association of University Professors' report, approximately 48 percent of faculty members in US colleges and universities were employed part time in fall 2021 (Colby <span>2023</span>, 2). As a result, one of the roles for a department chair has become to foster an adjunct culture that is rewarding, inclusive, communicative, and fair, despite institutional limitations. We present two perspectives for best practices in hiring and retaining adjunct instructors.</p><p>Manyiu Tse is in his sixth year as chair of the mathematics and computer science department at Molloy University. Molloy is a medium-size Roman Catholic university located in Rockville Centre, New York. Approximately 72 percent of the faculty at Molloy are adjuncts. His department offers, on average, 70 to 100 sections per academic year. These sections are taught by 6 full-time faculty (including the chair) and between 14 and 16 adjunct instructors.</p><p>Evelina Lapierre is in her seventh year as chair of the mathematics department at Johnson & Wales University (JWU) at the Providence campus. JWU is a medium-size private teaching-focused university with two campuses: one in Providence, Rhode Island, and the other in Charlotte, North Carolina. Approximately 48 percent of the faculty at JWU are adjuncts. The Providence mathematics department offers between 100 and 110 sections per academic year. These sections are taught by 5 full-time faculty (including the chair), 4 lecturers, and between 8 and 11 adjunct instructors.</p><p>Searching for and hiring adjuncts is different from searching for and hiring full-time faculty members, since there is more emphasis on teaching and less on research and university service. At Molloy, most math adjuncts are either retired high school teachers or recent graduates with a master's degree. Molloy has an extensive network of local math educators to draw from. Adjuncts also come from other departments at Molloy, alumni, and referrals from colleagues.</p><p>The math department at JWU keeps their online application perpetually open because they hire year-round. Final year graduate students or newly awarded master's degree students from local research universities can make great candidates. JWU also uses adjuncts and full-time faculty from other departments on campus (science, social sciences, and business).</p><p>It is important that newly hired adjuncts go through proper onboarding and mentoring to ensure that they feel welcomed in the role and understand the expectations. The Faculty Professional Center at Molloy holds a new faculty orientation before the start of the academic year. New faculty gain access to resources and support services that include technical support and professional development. The chair gives adjuncts a campus tour and provides t","PeriodicalId":101228,"journal":{"name":"The Department Chair","volume":"36 3","pages":"22-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dch.70014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146136557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>University of Texas Press, 2024</p><p>256 pp., $34.95</p><p>For department chairs working with marginalized and minoritized faculty, graduate students, and emerging scholars across career stages, this book offers implementable strategies, best practices, and concrete language for supporting, valuing, and amplifying the work of minoritized colleagues.</p><p>In part 1, contributors explore mentoring and visibility. Castor and Louis Jr., for example, offer strategies for supporting faculty in navigating joint appointments across multiple departments or programs, prompting home department chairs to remain mindful of supporting faculty in receiving credit for this work without taking on double faculty loads.</p><p>Blain addresses mentoring support beyond tenure, especially for women faculty of color. In addition to providing professional resources, Blain's chapter creates space for chairs to consider what this mentoring looks like at the department or local level.</p><p>Hoover's interview drawing on lived experience in economics prompts chairs to consider how biased and harmful norms about faculty and their work manifest and what role chairs play in disrupting these norms, supporting faculty, and allowing faculty talents and intellectual contributions to flourish.</p><p>The significance of visibility is consistently reinforced in part 1, including in Fong's exploration of “muted invisibility” (p. 66) through intersectional racialized experiences as an Asian American woman and contingent faculty in a predominantly white field, and in Winn's interview through the persistent dualism of racism that results in “invisibility” or “hypervisibility” (p. 85). Chairs will find much to work with in mentoring faculty through the kinds of coaching questions that Winn shares (see pages 89, 98, 99).</p><p>Extending this discussion of invisibility and its implications, opening part 2, Dutt-Ballerstadt explores responses to the #BlackInTheIvory hashtag created in June 2020, “detailing the myriad ways that Black scholars, scholarship, and excellence have been undermined and undervalued” (p. 106).</p><p>In the next chapter, Zape-Tah-Hol-Ah Starr Minthorn provides actionable steps and language for addressing the “invisibilization of Indigenous people” with strategies for “center[ing] our (Indigenous) voices and experiences” (p. 119). Significant for chairs and other administrators, the author points to missed opportunities in land acknowledgments for meaningful action (p. 120) and advocates for increased efforts to build relationships with Indigenous communities “and creat[e] safe spaces for Native students on campus” (p. 127).</p><p>Exploring ableism within a disability studies framework, Manchanda's chapter is especially relevant for chairs actively working to grow, diversify, and increase the accessibility of graduate programming.</p><p>In “Dealing with Sexual Harassment as a Junior Black Woman Scholar,” Buggs issues a direct call to action: “Advisers and department
{"title":"Conditionally Accepted: Navigating Higher Education from the Margins","authors":"Eric Joy Denise, Bertin M. Louis","doi":"10.1002/dch.70016","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dch.70016","url":null,"abstract":"<p>University of Texas Press, 2024</p><p>256 pp., $34.95</p><p>For department chairs working with marginalized and minoritized faculty, graduate students, and emerging scholars across career stages, this book offers implementable strategies, best practices, and concrete language for supporting, valuing, and amplifying the work of minoritized colleagues.</p><p>In part 1, contributors explore mentoring and visibility. Castor and Louis Jr., for example, offer strategies for supporting faculty in navigating joint appointments across multiple departments or programs, prompting home department chairs to remain mindful of supporting faculty in receiving credit for this work without taking on double faculty loads.</p><p>Blain addresses mentoring support beyond tenure, especially for women faculty of color. In addition to providing professional resources, Blain's chapter creates space for chairs to consider what this mentoring looks like at the department or local level.</p><p>Hoover's interview drawing on lived experience in economics prompts chairs to consider how biased and harmful norms about faculty and their work manifest and what role chairs play in disrupting these norms, supporting faculty, and allowing faculty talents and intellectual contributions to flourish.</p><p>The significance of visibility is consistently reinforced in part 1, including in Fong's exploration of “muted invisibility” (p. 66) through intersectional racialized experiences as an Asian American woman and contingent faculty in a predominantly white field, and in Winn's interview through the persistent dualism of racism that results in “invisibility” or “hypervisibility” (p. 85). Chairs will find much to work with in mentoring faculty through the kinds of coaching questions that Winn shares (see pages 89, 98, 99).</p><p>Extending this discussion of invisibility and its implications, opening part 2, Dutt-Ballerstadt explores responses to the #BlackInTheIvory hashtag created in June 2020, “detailing the myriad ways that Black scholars, scholarship, and excellence have been undermined and undervalued” (p. 106).</p><p>In the next chapter, Zape-Tah-Hol-Ah Starr Minthorn provides actionable steps and language for addressing the “invisibilization of Indigenous people” with strategies for “center[ing] our (Indigenous) voices and experiences” (p. 119). Significant for chairs and other administrators, the author points to missed opportunities in land acknowledgments for meaningful action (p. 120) and advocates for increased efforts to build relationships with Indigenous communities “and creat[e] safe spaces for Native students on campus” (p. 127).</p><p>Exploring ableism within a disability studies framework, Manchanda's chapter is especially relevant for chairs actively working to grow, diversify, and increase the accessibility of graduate programming.</p><p>In “Dealing with Sexual Harassment as a Junior Black Woman Scholar,” Buggs issues a direct call to action: “Advisers and department","PeriodicalId":101228,"journal":{"name":"The Department Chair","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dch.70016","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146136646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>We are witnessing some never before seen occurrences in higher education. Whether it is a mandate coming from your state or executive orders coming from the government, it is important to think clearly and holistically about academia and to not lose sight of what we do, which is to educate. It can be easy to be overwhelmed by the stress of the onslaught of events, requests, and reactions. Yet, although it is important to remain calm and not lose sight of what we do as educators (and as department chairs to assist our faculty), it is also important to think strategically and, if possible, proactively.</p><p>In the case of our institution, we recently experienced an academic program review in which every unit on campus underwent a thorough analysis of our offerings. Although we are not the only campus to undergo this event, there were some nuances on our campus and within our unit. Our unit used an approach in which our leadership team worked together to analyze various dashboards provided to us by our university.</p><p>Although not a particularly fun process, we both felt prepared to engage in meaningful discussions because of our anticipatory leadership styles. What exactly is an anticipatory leadership style? Stated simply, it is a style that includes paying consistent attention to student enrollment and trends, listening to faculty feedback, partnering with upper administrators to understand yearly data, and collaborating with other chairs. It also includes making strategic decisions and actions based on these conversations and collaborations in ways that will impact programmatic and departmental data when events such as an academic program review take place. This anticipatory leadership style also uses certain practical elements, which you can define for yourself.</p><p>In our case, the practical elements fall under the umbrella of professional programs, one in teacher education and the other in counselor education. Each of our programs includes accreditation considerations from outside agencies as well as a host of metrics from inside the university, hence the practical portion of what we do.</p><p>As department chairs, we made informed decisions and implemented changes prior to and during academic program review, ahead of the budget reductions. Stated differently, we focused on student credit hour generation, student enrollment, less spending on part-time lecturers, and more instructional/supervisory opportunities for doctoral students and full-time faculty.</p><p>In the case of our teacher education program, we used the COVID-19 pandemic as a marker of significant upcoming change. On a campus of 18,000, 51 percent of whom are first-generation college students, 54 percent are people of color, and 57 percent receive Pell grants, we knew a significant enrollment drop was about to occur, and up until that point, we had been using an expensive model of educating and supervising preservice teachers. The old model was excellent in many ways, bu
{"title":"Leading Through the Fog: How Chairs Can Anticipate and Align During Institutional Change","authors":"Kerri Richardson, Kelly Wester","doi":"10.1002/dch.70012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dch.70012","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We are witnessing some never before seen occurrences in higher education. Whether it is a mandate coming from your state or executive orders coming from the government, it is important to think clearly and holistically about academia and to not lose sight of what we do, which is to educate. It can be easy to be overwhelmed by the stress of the onslaught of events, requests, and reactions. Yet, although it is important to remain calm and not lose sight of what we do as educators (and as department chairs to assist our faculty), it is also important to think strategically and, if possible, proactively.</p><p>In the case of our institution, we recently experienced an academic program review in which every unit on campus underwent a thorough analysis of our offerings. Although we are not the only campus to undergo this event, there were some nuances on our campus and within our unit. Our unit used an approach in which our leadership team worked together to analyze various dashboards provided to us by our university.</p><p>Although not a particularly fun process, we both felt prepared to engage in meaningful discussions because of our anticipatory leadership styles. What exactly is an anticipatory leadership style? Stated simply, it is a style that includes paying consistent attention to student enrollment and trends, listening to faculty feedback, partnering with upper administrators to understand yearly data, and collaborating with other chairs. It also includes making strategic decisions and actions based on these conversations and collaborations in ways that will impact programmatic and departmental data when events such as an academic program review take place. This anticipatory leadership style also uses certain practical elements, which you can define for yourself.</p><p>In our case, the practical elements fall under the umbrella of professional programs, one in teacher education and the other in counselor education. Each of our programs includes accreditation considerations from outside agencies as well as a host of metrics from inside the university, hence the practical portion of what we do.</p><p>As department chairs, we made informed decisions and implemented changes prior to and during academic program review, ahead of the budget reductions. Stated differently, we focused on student credit hour generation, student enrollment, less spending on part-time lecturers, and more instructional/supervisory opportunities for doctoral students and full-time faculty.</p><p>In the case of our teacher education program, we used the COVID-19 pandemic as a marker of significant upcoming change. On a campus of 18,000, 51 percent of whom are first-generation college students, 54 percent are people of color, and 57 percent receive Pell grants, we knew a significant enrollment drop was about to occur, and up until that point, we had been using an expensive model of educating and supervising preservice teachers. The old model was excellent in many ways, bu","PeriodicalId":101228,"journal":{"name":"The Department Chair","volume":"36 3","pages":"16-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dch.70012","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146140077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lisa K. Hanasono, W. John Koolage, Mary-Jon Ludy, M. Elise Radina, Jerry C. Schnepp, Jolie A. Sheffer
<p>We've all been there: A new mandate from senior leadership requires swift operationalization. Time and resources are limited. Department chairs must translate top-down decisions into meaningful actions that align with the institutional mission and prioritize student success. But there are constraints and obstacles in place that may not be apparent to upper administration. Here we attempt to unpack the distinct perspectives and roles that chairs and associate deans have in making change on campus to chart a path toward more productive collaboration.</p><p>Using a Dear Colleague approach, our goal is to clarify the priorities of chairs versus assistant/associate deans in the hopes of helping colleagues better understand one another's perspectives. Although both roles are essential to the academic mission, they often operate at different organizational altitudes. Chairs are embedded in the daily life of departments, managing personnel, supporting faculty and students, and keeping programs running smoothly. Associate deans, on the other hand, are tasked with implementing broader strategic initiatives, ensuring compliance with institutional goals, and reporting progress up the chain of command. These distinct vantage points can sometimes lead to friction, especially when decisions made at one level seem to disrupt the delicate balance of responsibilities at another. If we can empathize and communicate more effectively across our academic leader roles, we can collaborate and problem-solve more productively. Consider the following email exchanges.</p><p><i>Dear Associate Dean,</i></p><p><i>As you might have anticipated, I am writing to express some deep concerns about the “new” fall course scheduling process. It is frustrating to receive half-baked mandates with unrealistic deadlines from the college. I am not sure you recall how difficult it is to change department culture.</i></p><p><i>Obviously, difficulties with the new scheduling process will vary by department, but we have some particularly rigid, but also quite important, faculty. Professor William Granderman, world leader in thaumaturgy studies, is just one example. His expectation, as with many senior faculty, is to maintain a two-day-a-week teaching schedule. This is necessary to maintain his research productivity. I am sure I don't have to remind you how important his grants are.</i></p><p><i>With a course schedule that has to be live for students by this Friday, I am begging for leniency with respect to the new schedule development process. I am confident that with a few more semesters, I can move our department culture, but I can't transform faculty overnight.</i></p><p><i>I know it's been several years since you transitioned from depart</i><i>ment chair to associate dean. Is there no way to phase in the new pro</i><i>cess, permitting time for faculty to adjust?</i></p><p><i>Help me be helped by you.</i></p><p><i>Sincerely,</i></p><p><i>Beleaguered Chair</i></p><p><i>Dear Chair,</i></p><
{"title":"Academic Leadership from Ten Thousand Feet or Under a Rock? Finding the Right Elevation Through Empathy","authors":"Lisa K. Hanasono, W. John Koolage, Mary-Jon Ludy, M. Elise Radina, Jerry C. Schnepp, Jolie A. Sheffer","doi":"10.1002/dch.70008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dch.70008","url":null,"abstract":"<p>We've all been there: A new mandate from senior leadership requires swift operationalization. Time and resources are limited. Department chairs must translate top-down decisions into meaningful actions that align with the institutional mission and prioritize student success. But there are constraints and obstacles in place that may not be apparent to upper administration. Here we attempt to unpack the distinct perspectives and roles that chairs and associate deans have in making change on campus to chart a path toward more productive collaboration.</p><p>Using a Dear Colleague approach, our goal is to clarify the priorities of chairs versus assistant/associate deans in the hopes of helping colleagues better understand one another's perspectives. Although both roles are essential to the academic mission, they often operate at different organizational altitudes. Chairs are embedded in the daily life of departments, managing personnel, supporting faculty and students, and keeping programs running smoothly. Associate deans, on the other hand, are tasked with implementing broader strategic initiatives, ensuring compliance with institutional goals, and reporting progress up the chain of command. These distinct vantage points can sometimes lead to friction, especially when decisions made at one level seem to disrupt the delicate balance of responsibilities at another. If we can empathize and communicate more effectively across our academic leader roles, we can collaborate and problem-solve more productively. Consider the following email exchanges.</p><p><i>Dear Associate Dean,</i></p><p><i>As you might have anticipated, I am writing to express some deep concerns about the “new” fall course scheduling process. It is frustrating to receive half-baked mandates with unrealistic deadlines from the college. I am not sure you recall how difficult it is to change department culture.</i></p><p><i>Obviously, difficulties with the new scheduling process will vary by department, but we have some particularly rigid, but also quite important, faculty. Professor William Granderman, world leader in thaumaturgy studies, is just one example. His expectation, as with many senior faculty, is to maintain a two-day-a-week teaching schedule. This is necessary to maintain his research productivity. I am sure I don't have to remind you how important his grants are.</i></p><p><i>With a course schedule that has to be live for students by this Friday, I am begging for leniency with respect to the new schedule development process. I am confident that with a few more semesters, I can move our department culture, but I can't transform faculty overnight.</i></p><p><i>I know it's been several years since you transitioned from depart</i><i>ment chair to associate dean. Is there no way to phase in the new pro</i><i>cess, permitting time for faculty to adjust?</i></p><p><i>Help me be helped by you.</i></p><p><i>Sincerely,</i></p><p><i>Beleaguered Chair</i></p><p><i>Dear Chair,</i></p><","PeriodicalId":101228,"journal":{"name":"The Department Chair","volume":"36 3","pages":"9-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dch.70008","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146148298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>The Chronicle of Higher Education, 2024</p><p>68 pp., $59.00</p><p>Being a dean requires incredible multitasking skills, savvy relationship-building tools, and minute-by-minute problem-solving. <i>A Toolbox for Deans: Essential Advice for</i> <i>Academic Leaders</i> is an excellent resource for current deans, department chairs, aspiring administrators, and deans moving to new roles and organizations. This book is easy to read and gives digestible tips on how to manage things like meetings, data, and the constant push and pull of being in the faculty world and the administrator world (sections 1 and 4). This collection of articles represents several authors and perspectives on areas like mentoring, imposter syndrome, and building social and political capital (section 2).</p><p>I've worked in two different state systems in Colorado and Minnesota. My dean roles have been only in community colleges, and I also taught in a university for more than five years. I collaborated closely with chairs and faculty for about ten years before becoming a dean. I work hard to be a scholar-practitioner, presenting at conferences at least once a year, working on my PhD, and contributing to publications. My expertise is so far outside of what the faculty teach, and I am one of few females on the team. I'm always learning, asking questions, and providing guidance based on my teaching style that can apply to many areas. This toolbox hits on the importance of building relationships through things like thoughtfully planned retreats, how to train and build leaders, and the importance of running a good meeting (section 4). All of these are tasks I work on daily in a variety of contexts.</p><p>It's critical to consider several areas before entering into a dean role, such as an honest look at the budget; the role of collective bargaining contracts; an overview of recent accreditation visits; the level of support you'll receive from deans in the institution, within the system, and from the key campus decision-makers; how the institution has handled change and overcome challenges; and the roles deans play in all levels of leadership. As Akakawa notes in the “Dare to Lead” article, “In applying for leadership positions, it's important to carefully reflect on how your experiences and skills may (or may not) align with an institution's expectations and opportunities for leadership” (p. 20).</p><p>This toolbox provides an overview of the dean's role as well as powerful questions to ask about the position. Running meetings, finding solid mentors, and knowing the boundaries and nuances of your faculty and organization are key. As Anft describes in his article, getting off to a strong start is critical in a new role. I spent the first year really listening, and it has helped me build relationships in many areas.</p><p>Another essential skill set needed by deans is project management. I often call myself the dean of whatever comes my way, and flexibility is key. It's also critical
《高等教育纪事报》(Chronicle of Higher Education), 202468页,59.00美元。作为一名院长,需要出色的多任务处理能力、精明的人际关系建立工具,以及分分秒秒解决问题的能力。《院长工具箱:学术领袖的基本建议》是一本优秀的资源,适用于现任院长、系主任、有抱负的管理人员和即将担任新角色和组织的院长。这本书很容易阅读,并提供了一些易于理解的建议,比如如何管理会议、数据,以及在教员世界和管理员世界中不断的推拉(第1和第4部分)。这篇文章的集合代表了几位作者对指导、冒名顶替综合症以及建立社会和政治资本等领域的观点(第2部分)。我在科罗拉多州和明尼苏达州两个不同的州系统工作过。我的院长职位只在社区学院,我也在大学里教了五年多的书。在成为院长之前,我与主席和教职员工密切合作了大约10年。我努力成为一名学者实践者,每年至少在会议上发表一次演讲,攻读博士学位,并为出版物撰稿。我的专业知识远远超出了老师们所教的范围,而且我是团队中为数不多的女性之一。我总是在学习,提出问题,并根据我的教学风格提供指导,这可以应用于许多领域。这个工具箱强调了建立人际关系的重要性,比如精心策划的务虚会,如何培训和培养领导者,以及组织一场好的会议的重要性(第4部分)。所有这些都是我每天在各种环境下工作的任务。在担任院长之前,考虑几个方面是至关重要的,比如诚实地看待预算;集体谈判合同的作用;最近的认证访问概述;你将从学院院长、系统内部以及校园主要决策者那里得到多少支持;该机构如何应对变化和克服挑战;以及院长在各级领导中所扮演的角色。正如Akakawa在“敢于领导”的文章中指出的那样,“在申请领导职位时,仔细思考你的经验和技能是否符合机构的期望和领导机会是很重要的”(第20页)。这个工具箱提供了院长角色的概述,以及关于该职位的有力问题。召开会议,寻找可靠的导师,了解你的教员和组织的界限和细微差别是关键。正如安弗特在他的文章中所描述的那样,在一个新的角色中,有一个良好的开端是至关重要的。第一年我真的在倾听,这帮助我在很多方面建立了人际关系。院长们需要的另一项基本技能是项目管理。无论遇到什么,我都称自己为“院长”,而灵活性是关键。跟踪项目、流程、时间表和任务的数量,并找到那些可以帮助你跟踪和组织的人,这一点也很重要。我喜欢读其他院长的建议,他们认为这个职位可能不适合他们,或者相反,这是他们可以享受的(第1和3部分)。我曾与一些管理者共事过,他们回到教师岗位,发现他们喜欢这种节奏和进行大规模变革的能力,现在一所私立大学的主席也是如此。跟随、面试以及与其他院长的交流都有助于了解这份工作。我想说的是,这本书缺少了院长对教师、学生和校园文化的影响。院长可以通过提供指导、专业发展和支持系统,以强有力的方式影响教师和学生。有一位老师告诉我:“你对我们很尊重,很有尊严,这让我专注于支持和关心我班上的学生。”作为一名院长,重要的是要看看你能为教员提供什么资源。是否有唾手可得的成果可以让你鼓舞士气,支持你的愿景?院长们常常在幕后帮助别人发光发热。尽管困难重重,但我们将继续致力于解决冲突,如何在增长和挑战的时代建立关系,以及如何在公平实践方面最好地教育教师。就像珀尔马特在《你做的事重要吗?》一书中指出的那样,在场、出现、深入研究工作真的很重要。新冠肺炎疫情导致高等教育发生了巨大变化,在如何帮助管理教职员工(包括院长)的职业倦怠方面,我们还有很多工作要做。高层领导必须与院长保持联系,帮助他们提高工作满意度,评估工作水平和倦怠程度。整个行业如何做出一些调整来支持这些重要角色?这本书是一个很好的开始。由圣保罗学院贸易与技术学院院长VA Hayman Barber审阅。邮箱:[Email protected]
{"title":"A Toolbox for Deans: Essential Advice for Academic Leaders","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/dch.70017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dch.70017","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Chronicle of Higher Education, 2024</p><p>68 pp., $59.00</p><p>Being a dean requires incredible multitasking skills, savvy relationship-building tools, and minute-by-minute problem-solving. <i>A Toolbox for Deans: Essential Advice for</i> <i>Academic Leaders</i> is an excellent resource for current deans, department chairs, aspiring administrators, and deans moving to new roles and organizations. This book is easy to read and gives digestible tips on how to manage things like meetings, data, and the constant push and pull of being in the faculty world and the administrator world (sections 1 and 4). This collection of articles represents several authors and perspectives on areas like mentoring, imposter syndrome, and building social and political capital (section 2).</p><p>I've worked in two different state systems in Colorado and Minnesota. My dean roles have been only in community colleges, and I also taught in a university for more than five years. I collaborated closely with chairs and faculty for about ten years before becoming a dean. I work hard to be a scholar-practitioner, presenting at conferences at least once a year, working on my PhD, and contributing to publications. My expertise is so far outside of what the faculty teach, and I am one of few females on the team. I'm always learning, asking questions, and providing guidance based on my teaching style that can apply to many areas. This toolbox hits on the importance of building relationships through things like thoughtfully planned retreats, how to train and build leaders, and the importance of running a good meeting (section 4). All of these are tasks I work on daily in a variety of contexts.</p><p>It's critical to consider several areas before entering into a dean role, such as an honest look at the budget; the role of collective bargaining contracts; an overview of recent accreditation visits; the level of support you'll receive from deans in the institution, within the system, and from the key campus decision-makers; how the institution has handled change and overcome challenges; and the roles deans play in all levels of leadership. As Akakawa notes in the “Dare to Lead” article, “In applying for leadership positions, it's important to carefully reflect on how your experiences and skills may (or may not) align with an institution's expectations and opportunities for leadership” (p. 20).</p><p>This toolbox provides an overview of the dean's role as well as powerful questions to ask about the position. Running meetings, finding solid mentors, and knowing the boundaries and nuances of your faculty and organization are key. As Anft describes in his article, getting off to a strong start is critical in a new role. I spent the first year really listening, and it has helped me build relationships in many areas.</p><p>Another essential skill set needed by deans is project management. I often call myself the dean of whatever comes my way, and flexibility is key. It's also critical ","PeriodicalId":101228,"journal":{"name":"The Department Chair","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dch.70017","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146136559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Case:Burt v. Fuchs et al., No. 1:22cv75 (N.D. Fla. 06/21/23)
Ruling: The US District Court, Northern District of Florida, dismissed a claim in a suit against the University of Florida president and other administrators.
Significance: A professor employed by a state university doesn't have a right of free speech with respect to statements he makes pursuant to his official duties.
Summary: The plaintiff was a tenured UF English professor. One day before classes were to begin in August 2021, the plaintiff sent an email to the students scheduled to attend his upcoming classes, stating that he had been ordered to teach face-to-face instead of remotely and that it was against his will to teach in person because of the possibility of contracting COVID-19. The email also included reproductions of an email string between himself and the department chair on the subject.
In January 2022, both the dean and the department chair sent a letter to the plaintiff accusing him of misconduct because the August 2021 email was improper, unprofessional, provocative, and adversarial. The letter also directed him to make student-related communications professional and to take courses in email effectiveness and cultivating judgment. The letter concluded by stating that any future violations would result in the termination of his employment.
The plaintiff filed a suit against the president and others, and one of his claims was a violation of the First Amendment. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the email wasn't protected because it had been sent pursuant to his responsibilities as a public employee.
The district court judge said that a government employee had no right of free speech with respect to statements he made as a part of his official duties. He then dismissed the claim, ruling that the August 2021 email was sent pursuant to the plaintiff's official duties because it dealt with the format of the courses he was employed to teach and went only to those students who were going to be in his classes.
案例:Burt v. Fuchs et al., No. 1:22cv75 (n.d Fla. 06/21/23)裁决:美国佛罗里达北区地方法院驳回了对佛罗里达大学校长和其他管理人员的诉讼请求。意义:被州立大学聘用的教授没有言论自由的权利,因为他是根据自己的职责发表言论的。原告是佛罗里达大学的终身英语教授。在2021年8月开学的前一天,原告给预定参加他即将到来的课程的学生发了一封电子邮件,称他被要求面对面授课,而不是远程授课,而且由于有可能感染COVID-19,亲自授课违背了他的意愿。这封电子邮件还包括他和系主任之间关于这个主题的电子邮件的副本。2022年1月,院长和系主任都给原告发了一封信,指控他行为不端,因为2021年8月的那封电子邮件不恰当、不专业、具有挑衅性和对抗性。这封信还要求他将与学生有关的沟通变得专业化,并参加电子邮件有效性和培养判断力的课程。这封信最后指出,今后任何违反规定的行为都将导致他被解雇。原告对总统和其他人提起诉讼,其中一项指控违反了宪法第一修正案。被告提出了驳回的动议,辩称这封电子邮件不受保护,因为它是根据他作为公职人员的职责发送的。地区法院法官说,一名政府雇员没有言论自由的权利,就他作为公务的一部分所作的陈述而言。他随后驳回了这一指控,裁定这封2021年8月的电子邮件是根据原告的公务发送的,因为它涉及到他受雇教授的课程的格式,并且只发给了那些将要上他的课的学生。
{"title":"Burt v. Fuchs et al.","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/dch.70020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dch.70020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Case:</b> <i>Burt v. Fuchs et al.</i>, No. 1:22cv75 (N.D. Fla. 06/21/23)</p><p><b>Ruling:</b> The US District Court, Northern District of Florida, dismissed a claim in a suit against the University of Florida president and other administrators.</p><p><b>Significance:</b> A professor employed by a state university doesn't have a right of free speech with respect to statements he makes pursuant to his official duties.</p><p><b>Summary:</b> The plaintiff was a tenured UF English professor. One day before classes were to begin in August 2021, the plaintiff sent an email to the students scheduled to attend his upcoming classes, stating that he had been ordered to teach face-to-face instead of remotely and that it was against his will to teach in person because of the possibility of contracting COVID-19. The email also included reproductions of an email string between himself and the department chair on the subject.</p><p>In January 2022, both the dean and the department chair sent a letter to the plaintiff accusing him of misconduct because the August 2021 email was improper, unprofessional, provocative, and adversarial. The letter also directed him to make student-related communications professional and to take courses in email effectiveness and cultivating judgment. The letter concluded by stating that any future violations would result in the termination of his employment.</p><p>The plaintiff filed a suit against the president and others, and one of his claims was a violation of the First Amendment. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the email wasn't protected because it had been sent pursuant to his responsibilities as a public employee.</p><p>The district court judge said that a government employee had no right of free speech with respect to statements he made as a part of his official duties. He then dismissed the claim, ruling that the August 2021 email was sent pursuant to the plaintiff's official duties because it dealt with the format of the courses he was employed to teach and went only to those students who were going to be in his classes.</p>","PeriodicalId":101228,"journal":{"name":"The Department Chair","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dch.70020","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146140079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>The precarity of the higher education sector endangers faculty morale. Declining enrollments, shrinking budgets, institutional reorganizations, attacks on diversity initiatives, and threats to free speech require knowledge workers to summon extraordinary resilience, endurance, adaptability, and creativity. Academic leaders need a repertoire of strategies for building and preserving faculty morale. This article shares ten strategies for morale-building, including collaborative grant writing and open educational resource building. Collaborative productivity mitigates faculty distress by reducing isolation and supporting the social and emotional energy necessary for successful adaptation to the increased stress of uncertainty.</p><p>Like many institutions, Columbia College Chicago, a four-year private arts and communications school in Chicago's south loop, faces numerous challenges to faculty vitality. As a Hispanic-serving institution in an urban environment, our institution, like many others, finds the current administration's hostility toward diversity initiatives and undocumented or recently documented students acutely challenging. Even before these latest threats to institutional vitality, the now proverbial demographic cliff, along with postpandemic reassessment of the value of college degrees, has resulted in lower enrollments and, therefore, declining travel budgets, fewer course releases, larger class sizes, and job uncertainty.</p><p>When I (Jeanne) unexpectedly stepped into an interim chair position in this context, the English department at my institution had been struggling for years to adjust to budgetary austerities. To complicate matters, our dean and provost had called for us to consider moving from a two-course first-year writing sequence to a core curriculum with just one required writing course—a shocking request for English department faculty. I wanted to shift what felt like reflex opposition and general unhappiness. What might make people feel excited and collaborative again? My answer: money that we control.</p><p>I worked with my first-year writing colleagues, librarians, development folks, and a biologist to apply for a US Department of Education grant to fund the creation of an open-access online writing textbook. Faculty were paid to write and build this textbook together (<i>Authoring Culture: The Foundations of Twenty-First Century Writing</i>). Getting paid and adding another peer reviewed publication to their vita made faculty readier to reimagine the first-year writing curriculum. Working with colleagues outside our department connected English faculty more deeply to other parts of the college community. We all worked closely with colleagues we barely knew before, which made us less lonely. We forged closer ties between adjunct faculty and tenured faculty—both groups of faculty worked on the book and both groups of faculty became eligible for travel funds to talk about the textbook. The next year, using the same m
高等教育部门的不稳定危及教师的士气。入学人数下降、预算缩减、机构重组、多样性倡议受到攻击以及言论自由受到威胁,都要求知识工作者具备非凡的韧性、忍耐力、适应能力和创造力。学术领袖需要一整套策略来建立和保持教员的士气。本文分享了十种建立士气的策略,包括合作拨款的撰写和开放教育资源的建设。通过减少孤立和支持成功适应不确定性增加的压力所必需的社会和情感能量,协作生产力减轻了教师的痛苦。像许多机构一样,芝加哥哥伦比亚学院(Columbia College Chicago)是一所位于芝加哥南部环线的四年制私立艺术和传播学院,它在师资活力方面面临着许多挑战。作为一个在城市环境中为西班牙裔服务的机构,我们的机构和许多其他机构一样,发现当前政府对多样性倡议和无证或最近有证学生的敌意极具挑战性。甚至在这些对机构活力的最新威胁之前,现在众所周知的人口悬崖,以及大流行后对大学学位价值的重新评估,已经导致入学率下降,因此,旅行预算下降,课程减少,班级规模扩大,就业不确定性增加。当我(珍妮)意外地在这种背景下担任临时主席时,我所在学院的英语系多年来一直在努力适应预算紧缩。更复杂的是,我们的院长和教务长要求我们考虑从第一年的两门写作课程改为核心课程,只有一门必修的写作课程——这对英语系教员来说是一个令人震惊的要求。我想要改变那种感觉像是反射性的对立和普遍的不快乐。什么能让人们再次感到兴奋和合作?我的回答是:我们控制的钱。我与一年级的写作同事、图书管理员、开发人员和一位生物学家一起申请了美国教育部的拨款,以资助创建一个开放获取的在线写作教科书。教师们受雇共同编写这本教材(《创作文化:二十一世纪写作的基础》)。获得报酬并在他们的简历中添加另一篇同行评议的出版物,使教师们更愿意重新构想第一年的写作课程。与系外同事的合作将英语教师与学院社区的其他部分更深入地联系起来。我们都与以前几乎不认识的同事密切合作,这让我们不那么孤独。我们在兼职教员和终身教员之间建立了更紧密的联系——两组教员都参与了这本书的编写,两组教员都有资格获得旅行基金来讨论这本教科书。第二年,使用相同的模型和类似的项目设计,我们的机构获得了一笔拨款来编写一本数学教科书。长期以来,学生们一直抱怨数学必修课程的课本太贵。在疫情期间,出版商免费提供了他们的作业软件。大流行后,教师不想回到不能向学生提供即时反馈的纸质作业。作为科学和数学系的新主任,我(贝丝)很快发现一些学生没有钱买书:学生们不及格是因为他们买不起书。教师们有机会创建一个免费的、开放获取的教科书,将解决数学教科书的费用问题。我说服教职员工和我一起写一份助学金,通过节省学生的钱和让教职员工控制自己的材料来改善学生的体验。一开始,教师们并不想申请资助。现在,同一批教员定期开会讨论这个项目,他们对我们开发了一个让学生如此直接受益的资源表示感谢。提高学生的负担能力和可及性可以激励教师。我们的数学教科书是一个复杂的项目,它帮助我们建立一个更加经济公平的未来,包括并支持那些买不起书的学生。此外,由于三个主要的数学课有一些共同的课程元素,编写这本教科书可以激发关于每个课的重要对话。如果没有这笔拨款,我们可能不会如此深入地讨论课程。我们还学习了使用Microsoft Teams、开放教育资源构建软件和辅助软件进行在线协作的新技能。在这个不确定的时期,投资企业给了我们一些积极的东西。想象积极的未来能维持一定程度的乐观,即使对没有直接参与资助的教员来说也是如此。我们并不是说我们学校的教职工士气都很好。 字典对士气的定义多种多样,包括热情、快乐、纪律和对使命的信念。士气是不可量化的,千变万化的,而且经常不受我们的管理控制。在我们学院,像许多学院一样,面临着真正令人生畏的挑战,尽管在会议上、社交媒体上和私下里表达不满,但大多数教师仍然给课堂带来了欢乐和非凡的热情。教职员工与主席和其他管理人员一起,对我们的课程进行了全面改革,重组了整个机构,并实施了重新设计的专业,这证明了教职员工对使命的持续信念。你今天在做什么来建立、重建、维持或加强教师士气?本文基于第81届美国学术院长年会的圆桌讨论,该会议于2025年2月19日至21日在亚利桑那州凤凰城举行。伊丽莎白·戴维斯-伯格(Elizabeth Davis-Berg)是生物学教授兼设计学院联席主任,珍妮·佩特勒(Jeanne Petrolle)是芝加哥哥伦比亚学院教务代理院长。邮箱:[Email protected], [Email protected]
{"title":"Ten Strategies for Preserving Faculty Morale During Institutional Transition","authors":"Elizabeth Davis-Berg, Jeanne Petrolle","doi":"10.1002/dch.70004","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dch.70004","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The precarity of the higher education sector endangers faculty morale. Declining enrollments, shrinking budgets, institutional reorganizations, attacks on diversity initiatives, and threats to free speech require knowledge workers to summon extraordinary resilience, endurance, adaptability, and creativity. Academic leaders need a repertoire of strategies for building and preserving faculty morale. This article shares ten strategies for morale-building, including collaborative grant writing and open educational resource building. Collaborative productivity mitigates faculty distress by reducing isolation and supporting the social and emotional energy necessary for successful adaptation to the increased stress of uncertainty.</p><p>Like many institutions, Columbia College Chicago, a four-year private arts and communications school in Chicago's south loop, faces numerous challenges to faculty vitality. As a Hispanic-serving institution in an urban environment, our institution, like many others, finds the current administration's hostility toward diversity initiatives and undocumented or recently documented students acutely challenging. Even before these latest threats to institutional vitality, the now proverbial demographic cliff, along with postpandemic reassessment of the value of college degrees, has resulted in lower enrollments and, therefore, declining travel budgets, fewer course releases, larger class sizes, and job uncertainty.</p><p>When I (Jeanne) unexpectedly stepped into an interim chair position in this context, the English department at my institution had been struggling for years to adjust to budgetary austerities. To complicate matters, our dean and provost had called for us to consider moving from a two-course first-year writing sequence to a core curriculum with just one required writing course—a shocking request for English department faculty. I wanted to shift what felt like reflex opposition and general unhappiness. What might make people feel excited and collaborative again? My answer: money that we control.</p><p>I worked with my first-year writing colleagues, librarians, development folks, and a biologist to apply for a US Department of Education grant to fund the creation of an open-access online writing textbook. Faculty were paid to write and build this textbook together (<i>Authoring Culture: The Foundations of Twenty-First Century Writing</i>). Getting paid and adding another peer reviewed publication to their vita made faculty readier to reimagine the first-year writing curriculum. Working with colleagues outside our department connected English faculty more deeply to other parts of the college community. We all worked closely with colleagues we barely knew before, which made us less lonely. We forged closer ties between adjunct faculty and tenured faculty—both groups of faculty worked on the book and both groups of faculty became eligible for travel funds to talk about the textbook. The next year, using the same m","PeriodicalId":101228,"journal":{"name":"The Department Chair","volume":"36 3","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dch.70004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146136561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}