首页 > 最新文献

The Department Chair最新文献

英文 中文
Washburn v. Kingsborough Community College et al. 沃什伯恩诉金斯堡社区学院案等。
Pub Date : 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1002/dch.70018

Case: Washburn v. Kingsborough Community College et al., No. 20-cv-0395 (E.D. N.Y. 03/29/23)

Ruling: The US District Court, Eastern District of New York, dismissed a claim in a suit against Kingsborough Community College.

Significance: The Americans with Disabilities Act defines disability as a physical or mental impairment substantially limiting one or more of the major life activities, a record of such an impairment, or being regarded as having such an impairment.

Summary: The plaintiff was a transgender KCC professor who filed a suit, and one of the claims was discrimination in violation of the ADA. The plaintiff claimed a qualifying disability because of gender dysphoria, physical limitations, a significant amount of which were due to gender-confirming surgery, and “other physical and mental impairments.”

The suit alleged that the provost and the department chair had discriminated by rejecting grants, disapproving of a “long-standing teaching arrangement” with Hunter College, preventing a transfer to another CUNY college, switching courses and course times, reducing program benefits, denying access to essential records, removing an administrative assistant, “misgendering” the plaintiff on several occasions, refusing to change the plaintiff's name and gender on Kingsborough records, and moving the plaintiff's office to a moldy storage closet. Kingsborough filed a motion to dismiss.

The district court judge said that there wasn't any indication of a disability within the meaning of ADA because the allegations contradicted any notion of a major life activity impairment since the plaintiff purportedly taught classes, spoke at colleges all over the country, and drafted both an op-ed article and an unspecified public petition. She dismissed the claim.

案件:Washburn诉Kingsborough Community College et al, No. 20-cv-0395 (E.D. N.Y. 03/29/23)判决:纽约东区美国地方法院驳回了对Kingsborough Community College的诉讼请求。意义:《美国残疾人法案》将残疾定义为严重限制一项或多项主要生活活动的身体或精神缺陷,有这种缺陷的记录,或被认为有这种缺陷。摘要:原告是一名跨性别的KCC教授,他提起了诉讼,其中一项指控是违反《美国残疾人法》的歧视。原告声称,由于性别焦虑、身体限制(其中很大一部分是由于性别确认手术造成的)以及“其他身体和精神损伤”,她的残疾符合条件。诉讼称,教务长和系主任存在歧视,包括拒绝拨款、不同意与亨特学院的“长期教学安排”、阻止学生转到纽约市立大学的另一所学院、转换课程和课程时间、减少项目福利、拒绝查看重要记录、解雇一名行政助理、多次“错定”原告、拒绝更改原告在金士伯勒记录上的姓名和性别。把原告的办公室搬到一个发霉的储物间。金斯堡提出了驳回动议。地方法院法官说,在《美国残疾人法》的意义上,没有任何残疾的迹象,因为这些指控与任何关于重大生活活动障碍的概念相矛盾,因为原告据称在全国各地的大学授课,演讲,并起草了一篇专栏文章和一份未指明的公开请愿书。她驳回了这一指控。
{"title":"Washburn v. Kingsborough Community College et al.","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/dch.70018","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dch.70018","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Case:</b> <i>Washburn v. Kingsborough Community College et al</i>., No. 20-cv-0395 (E.D. N.Y. 03/29/23)</p><p><b>Ruling:</b> The US District Court, Eastern District of New York, dismissed a claim in a suit against Kingsborough Community College.</p><p><b>Significance:</b> The Americans with Disabilities Act defines disability as a physical or mental impairment substantially limiting one or more of the major life activities, a record of such an impairment, or being regarded as having such an impairment.</p><p><b>Summary:</b> The plaintiff was a transgender KCC professor who filed a suit, and one of the claims was discrimination in violation of the ADA. The plaintiff claimed a qualifying disability because of gender dysphoria, physical limitations, a significant amount of which were due to gender-confirming surgery, and “other physical and mental impairments.”</p><p>The suit alleged that the provost and the department chair had discriminated by rejecting grants, disapproving of a “long-standing teaching arrangement” with Hunter College, preventing a transfer to another CUNY college, switching courses and course times, reducing program benefits, denying access to essential records, removing an administrative assistant, “misgendering” the plaintiff on several occasions, refusing to change the plaintiff's name and gender on Kingsborough records, and moving the plaintiff's office to a moldy storage closet. Kingsborough filed a motion to dismiss.</p><p>The district court judge said that there wasn't any indication of a disability within the meaning of ADA because the allegations contradicted any notion of a major life activity impairment since the plaintiff purportedly taught classes, spoke at colleges all over the country, and drafted both an op-ed article and an unspecified public petition. She dismissed the claim.</p>","PeriodicalId":101228,"journal":{"name":"The Department Chair","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dch.70018","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146136562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Build Bridges, Not Decks: Using Knowledge Brokerage to Inform Faculty Professional Development 搭建桥梁,而非铺盖:利用知识中介来指导教师的专业发展
Pub Date : 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1002/dch.70005
Emily Faulconer
<p>The glow of screens in the classroom is as familiar as the rustle of turning pages in previous decades. But something new has emerged. Generative AI (GenAI) is forcing instructors to reconsider the tried-and-true formats for course materials, engagement activities, and assessments. For administrators, this requires proactive leadership to guide faculty through this significant shift, with particular attention to faculty workload and developing necessary GenAI competencies.</p><p>The inevitable integration of GenAI into the educational landscape compels adaptation. As we revisit core aspects of our teaching practice, light will shine on areas where our expertise does not yet align with the capabilities and implications of this technology. This raises a question for careful consideration: Can traditional professional development frameworks empower us to engage with such a disruptive and transformative force?</p><p>Often faculty professional development is a one-size-fits-all approach, and it's easy to revert to the passive one-direction information flow and subsequent overreliance on slide decks. These development opportunities are frequently led internally, but they fail to effectively leverage internal expertise to its full potential. Just as sustainability education emphasizes the critical role of knowledge brokers in connecting diverse stakeholders and translating complex information into actionable insights, a similar approach holds promise for empowering faculty in the age of GenAI.</p><p>In this context, knowledge brokerage within professional development is a dynamic process of connection, facilitation, and linking. This involves bringing together faculty with diverse experiences and needs related to GenAI, facilitating the sharing of insights and best practices in GenAI use in curriculum design and teaching, and linking individuals with specific resources and expertise (within the institution and beyond) that can address their learning gaps and pedagogical challenges. Grounded in building pathways and relationships, not simply disseminating information, this can bridge the gap between the emerging educational research and practice and connect those facing similar challenges, making the professional development responsive and relevant (see figure 1). Participants should ideally leave the development opportunity with increased confidence, deeper knowledge, an expanded personal learning network, and a foundation for an agile approach to GenAI in teaching and learning.</p><p>These examples show how knowledge brokerage moves beyond workshops and into shared discovery and community-driven solutions to this emerging issue in higher education.</p><p>This collaborative and responsive approach warrants evaluation, with the potential to yield more impactful and relevant professional development opportunities that build community and challenge silos, ultimately increasing the pace of adoption of innovative practices in using GenAI in higher educati
教室里屏幕的光芒就像几十年前翻页时的沙沙声一样熟悉。但是一些新的东西出现了。生成式人工智能(GenAI)正在迫使教师重新考虑课程材料、参与活动和评估的可靠格式。对于管理人员来说,这需要积极主动的领导来指导教师完成这一重大转变,特别关注教师的工作量和发展必要的GenAI能力。基因人工智能不可避免地融入了教育领域,这迫使人们进行适应。当我们重新审视我们教学实践的核心方面时,我们的专业知识还没有与这项技术的能力和影响相一致的领域将得到启发。这就提出了一个需要仔细考虑的问题:传统的专业发展框架是否能够使我们与这种破坏性和变革性的力量接触?通常,教师的专业发展是一种放之四海而皆准的方法,很容易回到被动的单向信息流,然后过度依赖幻灯片。这些发展机会往往是由内部领导的,但它们未能有效地利用内部专门知识来充分发挥其潜力。正如可持续发展教育强调知识经纪人在连接不同利益相关者和将复杂信息转化为可操作见解方面的关键作用一样,类似的方法也有望在GenAI时代赋予教师权力。在此背景下,专业发展中的知识中介是一个动态的连接、促进、衔接的过程。这包括将与GenAI相关的不同经验和需求的教师聚集在一起,促进在课程设计和教学中使用GenAI的见解和最佳实践的分享,并将个人与特定的资源和专业知识联系起来(在机构内外),以解决他们的学习差距和教学挑战。以建立途径和关系为基础,而不仅仅是传播信息,这可以弥合新兴教育研究和实践之间的差距,并将面临类似挑战的人联系起来,使专业发展具有响应性和相关性(见图1)。理想情况下,参与者应该带着增强的信心、更深入的知识、扩展的个人学习网络以及在教学和学习中使用GenAI敏捷方法的基础离开开发机会。这些例子表明,知识中介如何超越研讨会,进入共享发现和社区驱动的解决方案,以解决高等教育中的这一新兴问题。这种协作和响应的方法值得评估,有可能产生更有影响力和相关的专业发展机会,建立社区和挑战孤岛,最终加快采用创新实践的步伐,在高等教育中使用GenAI。这些努力可以很容易地与围绕学生成功或机构适应性的共同机构目标保持一致。最终,我们提倡的转变是建造桥梁,而不是甲板。传统的专业发展通常类似于静态演示的交付——向被动的观众展示一叠幻灯片,偶尔会有参与的时刻。相反,知识经纪积极地在人、需求、资源、新想法和实际应用之间建立联系。知识中介的原则有可能改变教师的专业发展,创造一个共享学习和专业知识的动态生态系统。这种网络化、自适应的方法可以在GenAI快速发展的环境中得到很好的利用,在GenAI中,分享见解和敏捷响应的能力日益紧迫。面对GenAI的挑战,让我们超越传统的工作坊,走向网络化学习。Emily Faulconer是莫纳什大学生物科学学院的高级讲师。邮箱:[Email protected]
{"title":"Build Bridges, Not Decks: Using Knowledge Brokerage to Inform Faculty Professional Development","authors":"Emily Faulconer","doi":"10.1002/dch.70005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dch.70005","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The glow of screens in the classroom is as familiar as the rustle of turning pages in previous decades. But something new has emerged. Generative AI (GenAI) is forcing instructors to reconsider the tried-and-true formats for course materials, engagement activities, and assessments. For administrators, this requires proactive leadership to guide faculty through this significant shift, with particular attention to faculty workload and developing necessary GenAI competencies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The inevitable integration of GenAI into the educational landscape compels adaptation. As we revisit core aspects of our teaching practice, light will shine on areas where our expertise does not yet align with the capabilities and implications of this technology. This raises a question for careful consideration: Can traditional professional development frameworks empower us to engage with such a disruptive and transformative force?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Often faculty professional development is a one-size-fits-all approach, and it's easy to revert to the passive one-direction information flow and subsequent overreliance on slide decks. These development opportunities are frequently led internally, but they fail to effectively leverage internal expertise to its full potential. Just as sustainability education emphasizes the critical role of knowledge brokers in connecting diverse stakeholders and translating complex information into actionable insights, a similar approach holds promise for empowering faculty in the age of GenAI.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this context, knowledge brokerage within professional development is a dynamic process of connection, facilitation, and linking. This involves bringing together faculty with diverse experiences and needs related to GenAI, facilitating the sharing of insights and best practices in GenAI use in curriculum design and teaching, and linking individuals with specific resources and expertise (within the institution and beyond) that can address their learning gaps and pedagogical challenges. Grounded in building pathways and relationships, not simply disseminating information, this can bridge the gap between the emerging educational research and practice and connect those facing similar challenges, making the professional development responsive and relevant (see figure 1). Participants should ideally leave the development opportunity with increased confidence, deeper knowledge, an expanded personal learning network, and a foundation for an agile approach to GenAI in teaching and learning.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;These examples show how knowledge brokerage moves beyond workshops and into shared discovery and community-driven solutions to this emerging issue in higher education.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This collaborative and responsive approach warrants evaluation, with the potential to yield more impactful and relevant professional development opportunities that build community and challenge silos, ultimately increasing the pace of adoption of innovative practices in using GenAI in higher educati","PeriodicalId":101228,"journal":{"name":"The Department Chair","volume":"36 3","pages":"7-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dch.70005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146139201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Enhancing Online Learning Using Academic Coaches for Retention, Student Success, and Instructor Well-Being 利用学术教练加强在线学习,促进学生的保留,学生的成功和教师的幸福
Pub Date : 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1002/dch.70010
Jacquelyn Cato, Harriet Watkins
<p>Access to higher education through online learning platforms at colleges and universities has grown significantly over the past decade, enabling educational opportunities for both students and faculty. In addition, the online delivery of courses has given students great flexibility in learning and pursuing degrees while also increasing flexibility for online instructors. This is especially true in relation to teaching schedules and the ability to reach a more diverse and global student audience. Although online education offers flexibility and accessibility within the higher education realm, institutions face persistent concerns about student retention. Students who primarily study online often face many struggles related to academic preparedness, motivation, and feelings of isolation, all of which can lead to higher drop, fail, and withdrawal rates. Challenges such as these compel colleges and universities to explore innovative strategies to support student success and persistence. This article argues for the strategic integration of academic coaches as a useful tool and approach to enhance student retention in online classes. It also emphasizes the importance of addressing work-life balance for online instructors whose demanding roles require effective self-management and institutional support.</p><p>However, despite these efforts, student retention remains a concern, highlighting the need for innovative solutions.</p><p>An innovative solution may lie in the simple form of human connection through academic coaches. When an academic coach works alongside students in the online course, it helps them engage in and connect to the course material, making them feel seen and heard. A human connection can make all the difference for students.</p><p>Academic coaching is a powerful tool for enhancing student retention and success in online learning environments. By providing personalized support, academic coaches address the diverse challenges that students face, which are significant factors in student attrition. This proactive support fosters student engagement, promotes a sense of belonging, and cultivates a positive learning environment, ultimately increasing persistence and improving overall academic performance. Crucially, academic coaching establishes human-to-human connections that cannot be replicated by AI, as they involve empathy, personalized interaction, and the development of meaningful relationships, which are vital for student motivation and support.</p><p>The University of Texas at Arlington (UTA) College of Nursing and Health Innovation (CONHI), in collaboration with Academic Partnerships, implemented an online RN-to-BSN program in 2008 to provide flexibility for working RNs seeking to further their education. This program, referred to as the accelerated online (AO) program, uses academic coaches to support student learning and engagement. Academic coaches in the UTA CONHI's AO program are required to have a minimum of a master's deg
在过去十年中,通过高校在线学习平台接受高等教育的人数显著增加,为学生和教师提供了受教育的机会。此外,课程的在线交付给了学生学习和攻读学位的极大灵活性,同时也增加了在线教师的灵活性。这在教学计划和接触更多样化和全球学生的能力方面尤其如此。尽管在线教育在高等教育领域提供了灵活性和可访问性,但院校一直面临着学生留用的问题。主要在网上学习的学生经常面临许多与学术准备、动机和孤立感有关的斗争,所有这些都可能导致更高的辍学、失败和退学率。这些挑战迫使学院和大学探索创新的策略来支持学生的成功和坚持。本文认为,学术教练的战略整合是提高在线课程学生留存率的有效工具和途径。它还强调了解决在线教师的工作与生活平衡的重要性,他们的角色要求有效的自我管理和制度支持。然而,尽管做出了这些努力,学生留存率仍然是一个令人担忧的问题,这凸显了创新解决方案的必要性。一个创新的解决方案可能在于通过学术教练建立人际联系的简单形式。当学术教练在在线课程中与学生一起工作时,这有助于他们参与并与课程材料联系起来,让他们感到被关注和被倾听。人际关系对学生来说意义重大。学术指导是一个强大的工具,提高学生的保留和成功的在线学习环境。通过提供个性化的支持,学术教练解决了学生面临的各种挑战,这些挑战是导致学生流失的重要因素。这种积极的支持促进了学生的参与,促进了归属感,培养了一个积极的学习环境,最终增加了持久性,提高了整体学习成绩。至关重要的是,学术指导建立了人工智能无法复制的人与人之间的联系,因为它们涉及移情、个性化互动和有意义关系的发展,这对学生的动机和支持至关重要。德克萨斯大学阿灵顿分校(UTA)护理与健康创新学院(CONHI)与学术伙伴合作,于2008年实施了一项在线注册护士转bsn计划,为在职注册护士寻求进一步教育提供灵活性。这个项目被称为加速在线(AO)项目,使用学术教练来支持学生的学习和参与。UTA CONHI的AO课程的学术教练要求至少拥有护理硕士学位,并具有根据课程内容和水平量身定制的特定资格。这些教练是由教学联系公司招聘和筛选的,该公司是为学院和大学提供高质量教学支持服务的领先供应商,我们都为其领导团队服务。学术教练的主要作用是为教师提供支持,并在在线环境中为学生创造一个小组学习体验。学术教练促进学生互动,提供反馈,协助评分,以及其他职责。教师和学生都对他们进行评估,并根据需要提供补救措施。一项研究分析了UTA CONHI加速在线课程中学术教练的特点及其对学生和教师评估的影响(Cipher et al. 2018)。调查对象包括94名教练、166门课程、14004名学生,结果显示,学术教练以女性居多(97.9%),平均年龄为44.4岁。大部分教练拥有硕士学位(93.6%),教练的平均经验超过3年。教师和学生对教练的评价总体上是有利的,平均评分在4.5分以上(满分5分)。研究发现,教练经历与教师对坚持课程大纲的评分呈正相关。该研究得出结论,学术教练通过支持学生和教师,在在线RN-BSN项目中发挥了重要作用。使用教练可以帮助扩大在线课程的规模,同时保持质量和积极的学生成果。教育支持服务,如教学联系,促进了大学课程中学术教练的实施。学术教练是在其领域具有硕士或更高学位的经验丰富的从业人员。他们帮助学生学习,讨论,并引导课程进展。 学术教练还可以通过批改作业和管理交流来支持教师。这使得教师有更多的时间专注于课程和成果。教学连接模式为他们的合作机构提供持续的支持,帮助学院和大学管理和扩展在线教室和课程。将学术教练整合到在线项目和课程中有几个好处。提高学生留存率。导致人员流失的因素可以在教师和学术教练之间进行讨论,以制定解决方案。引用教员的话:“学术教练帮助我为学习困难的学生制定了改进计划,从而提高了学生的保留率。”提高学习成绩。学术教练有经验,有助于有效的学习策略,他们提供详细的反馈作业,以帮助学生成功。引用教师的话:“许多学术教练都是经验丰富的从业者,我经常听取他们对课程更新的意见。他们成为创新和变革的第二意见来源。”提高学生参与度。学术教练有助于减少孤立感,促进与学生的互动。引用教师的话:“我觉得学术教练为我的学生提供了另一种人际关系,或者说是倾听的耳朵。这项服务还为我提供了一个间接的联系,让我更好地了解我的学生在想什么或在为什么而挣扎。”增加持久性和完成度。为了帮助学生克服课堂上的学术挑战,学术教练为学生提供学习策略并鼓励他们继续学习。可扩展性和成本效益。使用学术教练来扩展课程以满足不断增长的入学需求是可以实现的,因为它允许学生在他们的时间表中添加课程,而不会因为之前较低的课程上限而推迟。教师的支持。学术教练协助完成许多日常任务,使教师能够将更多的时间集中在提供课程内容上,同时确保课程和学生的成果。引用教师的话:“学术导师可以是一个很好的缓冲,所以我只会问主要问题,但他们仍然让我了解当前的对话和评分问题。”然而,这个列表并没有提到学术教练为教师的工作与生活平衡需求提供的额外好处。对于在线工作的大学教师来说,工作与生活的平衡是至关重要的,因为他们的角色需要多方面的要求,包括教学、研究、指导和行政责任。使用学术教练来抵消一些教师工作量问题、设定明确的界限、优先处理任务以及寻求机构支持等策略可以帮助教师更有效地管理他们的职责。最近的一项研究表明,教师认为在他们的在线课程中使用学术教练有很多好处(Cato 2024)。从这项研究中出现了以下主题:加强沟通,更好地支持教师和学生,增加学生保留率,提高学生参与度和满意度,以及为教师节省时间带来更好的工作与生活平衡。通过优先考虑工作与生活的平衡,机构支持教师,创造一个更可持续、更有效的在线学习环境。将学术教练纳入教师的课堂可以带来重要的支持,允许使用额外的技能来帮助教师在课堂和高等教育中茁壮成长。使用学术教练是提高学生保留率和在线学习成功的一种有价值的策略。通过提供个性化的支持和解决关键挑战,学术教练可以提高学生的成绩,为学生和教师创造一个更支持性的学习环境。此外,解决在线教师的工作与生活平衡对他们的福祉和在线教育的整体质量至关重要。教学联系的学术教练模式对教师和学生来说都是一个无价的工具,因为它增加了对整个课程成功至关重要的支持层。这篇文章是基于学术主席年度会议上的演讲,该会议将于2025年2月5-7日在印第安纳州的印第安纳波利斯举行。杰奎琳·卡托是教学联系有限责任公司的首席战略官,也是众多高等教育机构的兼职讲师。哈丽特·沃特金斯是教学联系有限责任公司的首席学术官,也是德克萨斯大学格兰德谷分校的兼职讲师。邮箱:[Email protected], [Email protected]
{"title":"Enhancing Online Learning Using Academic Coaches for Retention, Student Success, and Instructor Well-Being","authors":"Jacquelyn Cato,&nbsp;Harriet Watkins","doi":"10.1002/dch.70010","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dch.70010","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Access to higher education through online learning platforms at colleges and universities has grown significantly over the past decade, enabling educational opportunities for both students and faculty. In addition, the online delivery of courses has given students great flexibility in learning and pursuing degrees while also increasing flexibility for online instructors. This is especially true in relation to teaching schedules and the ability to reach a more diverse and global student audience. Although online education offers flexibility and accessibility within the higher education realm, institutions face persistent concerns about student retention. Students who primarily study online often face many struggles related to academic preparedness, motivation, and feelings of isolation, all of which can lead to higher drop, fail, and withdrawal rates. Challenges such as these compel colleges and universities to explore innovative strategies to support student success and persistence. This article argues for the strategic integration of academic coaches as a useful tool and approach to enhance student retention in online classes. It also emphasizes the importance of addressing work-life balance for online instructors whose demanding roles require effective self-management and institutional support.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, despite these efforts, student retention remains a concern, highlighting the need for innovative solutions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;An innovative solution may lie in the simple form of human connection through academic coaches. When an academic coach works alongside students in the online course, it helps them engage in and connect to the course material, making them feel seen and heard. A human connection can make all the difference for students.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Academic coaching is a powerful tool for enhancing student retention and success in online learning environments. By providing personalized support, academic coaches address the diverse challenges that students face, which are significant factors in student attrition. This proactive support fosters student engagement, promotes a sense of belonging, and cultivates a positive learning environment, ultimately increasing persistence and improving overall academic performance. Crucially, academic coaching establishes human-to-human connections that cannot be replicated by AI, as they involve empathy, personalized interaction, and the development of meaningful relationships, which are vital for student motivation and support.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The University of Texas at Arlington (UTA) College of Nursing and Health Innovation (CONHI), in collaboration with Academic Partnerships, implemented an online RN-to-BSN program in 2008 to provide flexibility for working RNs seeking to further their education. This program, referred to as the accelerated online (AO) program, uses academic coaches to support student learning and engagement. Academic coaches in the UTA CONHI's AO program are required to have a minimum of a master's deg","PeriodicalId":101228,"journal":{"name":"The Department Chair","volume":"36 3","pages":"20-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dch.70010","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146139200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Chair's Guide to Adjuncts 客座教授指南
Pub Date : 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1002/dch.70014
Manyiu Tse, Evelina Lapierre
<p>Adjunct instructors are essential to higher education because they provide critical instructional support, offer industry experience, and help reduce institutions' expenses. According to an American Association of University Professors' report, approximately 48 percent of faculty members in US colleges and universities were employed part time in fall 2021 (Colby <span>2023</span>, 2). As a result, one of the roles for a department chair has become to foster an adjunct culture that is rewarding, inclusive, communicative, and fair, despite institutional limitations. We present two perspectives for best practices in hiring and retaining adjunct instructors.</p><p>Manyiu Tse is in his sixth year as chair of the mathematics and computer science department at Molloy University. Molloy is a medium-size Roman Catholic university located in Rockville Centre, New York. Approximately 72 percent of the faculty at Molloy are adjuncts. His department offers, on average, 70 to 100 sections per academic year. These sections are taught by 6 full-time faculty (including the chair) and between 14 and 16 adjunct instructors.</p><p>Evelina Lapierre is in her seventh year as chair of the mathematics department at Johnson & Wales University (JWU) at the Providence campus. JWU is a medium-size private teaching-focused university with two campuses: one in Providence, Rhode Island, and the other in Charlotte, North Carolina. Approximately 48 percent of the faculty at JWU are adjuncts. The Providence mathematics department offers between 100 and 110 sections per academic year. These sections are taught by 5 full-time faculty (including the chair), 4 lecturers, and between 8 and 11 adjunct instructors.</p><p>Searching for and hiring adjuncts is different from searching for and hiring full-time faculty members, since there is more emphasis on teaching and less on research and university service. At Molloy, most math adjuncts are either retired high school teachers or recent graduates with a master's degree. Molloy has an extensive network of local math educators to draw from. Adjuncts also come from other departments at Molloy, alumni, and referrals from colleagues.</p><p>The math department at JWU keeps their online application perpetually open because they hire year-round. Final year graduate students or newly awarded master's degree students from local research universities can make great candidates. JWU also uses adjuncts and full-time faculty from other departments on campus (science, social sciences, and business).</p><p>It is important that newly hired adjuncts go through proper onboarding and mentoring to ensure that they feel welcomed in the role and understand the expectations. The Faculty Professional Center at Molloy holds a new faculty orientation before the start of the academic year. New faculty gain access to resources and support services that include technical support and professional development. The chair gives adjuncts a campus tour and provides t
兼职教师对高等教育至关重要,因为他们提供关键的教学支持,提供行业经验,并帮助减少机构的开支。根据美国大学教授协会的一份报告,在2021年秋季,大约48%的美国学院和大学教师是兼职的(Colby 2023, 2)。因此,系主任的角色之一是培养一种辅助文化,这种文化是有益的,包容的,沟通的,公平的,尽管有制度上的限制。我们提出了雇用和保留兼职教师的最佳实践的两个观点。谢万耀担任莫洛伊大学数学与计算机科学系系主任已是第六年。莫洛伊大学是一所中等规模的罗马天主教大学,位于纽约罗克维尔中心。莫洛伊学院大约72%的教员是兼职教师。他的院系每学年平均开设70到100个小组。这些部分由6名全职教师(包括主席)和14至16名兼职教师授课。伊芙琳娜·拉皮埃尔是威尔士约翰逊大学普罗维登斯校区数学系的主任,这是她担任数学系主任的第七年。JWU是一所中等规模的私立教学型大学,有两个校区:一个在罗德岛州的普罗维登斯,另一个在北卡罗来纳州的夏洛特。JWU大约48%的教员是兼职教员。普罗维登斯数学系每学年提供100到110个课程。这些部分由5名全职教师(包括主席),4名讲师和8至11名兼职讲师授课。寻找和雇用兼职教师与寻找和雇用全职教师不同,因为兼职教师更强调教学,而较少强调研究和大学服务。在莫洛伊大学,大多数数学副教授要么是退休的高中教师,要么是刚毕业的硕士。莫洛伊有一个广泛的当地数学教育网络可供借鉴。兼职人员也来自莫洛伊的其他部门、校友和同事推荐。JWU数学系的在线申请永远开放,因为他们全年招聘。来自当地研究型大学的应届研究生或新获得硕士学位的学生都是很好的候选人。JWU还从校园其他部门(科学,社会科学和商业)聘请兼职和全职教师。重要的是,新聘用的兼职教师要经过适当的培训和指导,以确保他们在这个职位上感到受欢迎,并理解公司的期望。莫洛伊学院专业中心在学年开始前举行新的教师培训。新教师可以获得资源和支持服务,包括技术支持和专业发展。主席带领兼职教师参观校园,并为他们提供课程大纲模板和教科书。由于部门很小,主席通过培养一个支持性和开放的环境非正式地指导兼职人员,并积极倡导他们。在JWU数学系采取动手的方法。它有一个完善的教授/兼职指导计划。导师提供建议,分享课程材料,监督助教的课程页面,并每隔一年进行一次课堂观察。该部门保持一个在线存储库,其中包含部门会议议程,录音和会议记录,部门期末考试,课程教学大纲模板,个性化教学大纲样本,建议的每周课程安排,以及所有核心课程的低风险和高风险评估。兼职教授被邀请参加部门会议。如果任何一个分数低于部门平均水平一个标准差,那么主席将开始与助教就教学和学习进行对话,为他们提供可用于改善教学和学生参与度的工具。所有学生的投诉都作为第一个投诉点直接提交给主席。师生之间的误解包括评分标准、电子邮件或反馈的语气以及学术诚信问题。不管投诉的类型是什么,主席都会从学生和老师那里收集信息,然后准备一个行动计划。行动计划可能包括课堂观察,学生和教师之间的调解,在极少数情况下,向院长汇报。JWU的学生投诉由主席处理,无论讲师的级别如何,过程都是一样的。学生必须与主席会面,以确定具体的行动点。然后,主席与教职员工会面,并根据这些要点设定目标。两周后,由导师或主席进行课堂观察。为了留住助教,我们必须理解他们为什么离开。有时是经济上的。 根据美国教师联合会(American Federation of Teachers) 2022年发布的一份报告,43%的临时教师(兼职、全职、非终身教职教师、讲师、讲师和研究生雇员)每门课程的收入低于3500美元,近28%的人年收入低于26500美元。有时他们会找到全职工作。这份报告还发现,63%的受访者想要全职工作,但只能找到兼职工作。在莫洛伊学院,兼职教师每门课程的收入在3300美元到3600美元之间。显然,这是不可持续的,尤其是在纽约长岛。有些兼职教授在其他地方机构任教,特别是社区大学。然而,许多兼职教授已经在莫洛伊工作了15年以上。他们长寿的常见原因包括教学作为一种与学生重新联系的手段,通过社会活动与系里的联系感,通过让他们参与入门课程的课程审查和协助高中对molloy等效课程的观察来培养一个包容的环境。此外,兼职人员的服务年数得到承认,并有晋升的机会。因为许多兼职教授有多个工作,所以安排时间对他们来说很困难。教学时间表提前完成并与教师共享(秋季时间表在3月准备,春季时间表在4月准备)。兼职教师通常有两个背靠背的部分。在他们喜欢的时间里,他们被分配到他们喜欢的课程(根据他们每年填写的调查显示)。兼职教师在高等教育中起着至关重要的作用。尽管收入有限,但他们都是敬业的教育者。虽然有办法将附庸文化转变为更具包容性的学术社区,但变革往往是一个复杂的制度过程,受到预算限制、制度惯性和缺乏发言权等因素的限制。然而,在系一级,支持性的主席可以在不改变机构政策的情况下改变助理的经验。本文基于学术主席会议上的一份报告,该会议于2025年2月5日至7日在印第安纳州印第安纳波利斯举行。谢曼瑶,美国莫洛伊大学数学与计算机科学系副教授兼系主任。Evelina Lapierre是威尔士约翰逊大学普罗维登斯校区数学系的教授和系主任。邮箱:[Email protected], [Email protected]
{"title":"A Chair's Guide to Adjuncts","authors":"Manyiu Tse,&nbsp;Evelina Lapierre","doi":"10.1002/dch.70014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dch.70014","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Adjunct instructors are essential to higher education because they provide critical instructional support, offer industry experience, and help reduce institutions' expenses. According to an American Association of University Professors' report, approximately 48 percent of faculty members in US colleges and universities were employed part time in fall 2021 (Colby &lt;span&gt;2023&lt;/span&gt;, 2). As a result, one of the roles for a department chair has become to foster an adjunct culture that is rewarding, inclusive, communicative, and fair, despite institutional limitations. We present two perspectives for best practices in hiring and retaining adjunct instructors.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Manyiu Tse is in his sixth year as chair of the mathematics and computer science department at Molloy University. Molloy is a medium-size Roman Catholic university located in Rockville Centre, New York. Approximately 72 percent of the faculty at Molloy are adjuncts. His department offers, on average, 70 to 100 sections per academic year. These sections are taught by 6 full-time faculty (including the chair) and between 14 and 16 adjunct instructors.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Evelina Lapierre is in her seventh year as chair of the mathematics department at Johnson &amp; Wales University (JWU) at the Providence campus. JWU is a medium-size private teaching-focused university with two campuses: one in Providence, Rhode Island, and the other in Charlotte, North Carolina. Approximately 48 percent of the faculty at JWU are adjuncts. The Providence mathematics department offers between 100 and 110 sections per academic year. These sections are taught by 5 full-time faculty (including the chair), 4 lecturers, and between 8 and 11 adjunct instructors.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Searching for and hiring adjuncts is different from searching for and hiring full-time faculty members, since there is more emphasis on teaching and less on research and university service. At Molloy, most math adjuncts are either retired high school teachers or recent graduates with a master's degree. Molloy has an extensive network of local math educators to draw from. Adjuncts also come from other departments at Molloy, alumni, and referrals from colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The math department at JWU keeps their online application perpetually open because they hire year-round. Final year graduate students or newly awarded master's degree students from local research universities can make great candidates. JWU also uses adjuncts and full-time faculty from other departments on campus (science, social sciences, and business).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It is important that newly hired adjuncts go through proper onboarding and mentoring to ensure that they feel welcomed in the role and understand the expectations. The Faculty Professional Center at Molloy holds a new faculty orientation before the start of the academic year. New faculty gain access to resources and support services that include technical support and professional development. The chair gives adjuncts a campus tour and provides t","PeriodicalId":101228,"journal":{"name":"The Department Chair","volume":"36 3","pages":"22-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dch.70014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146136557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conditionally Accepted: Navigating Higher Education from the Margins 有条件录取:从边缘引导高等教育
Pub Date : 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1002/dch.70016
Eric Joy Denise, Bertin M. Louis
<p>University of Texas Press, 2024</p><p>256 pp., $34.95</p><p>For department chairs working with marginalized and minoritized faculty, graduate students, and emerging scholars across career stages, this book offers implementable strategies, best practices, and concrete language for supporting, valuing, and amplifying the work of minoritized colleagues.</p><p>In part 1, contributors explore mentoring and visibility. Castor and Louis Jr., for example, offer strategies for supporting faculty in navigating joint appointments across multiple departments or programs, prompting home department chairs to remain mindful of supporting faculty in receiving credit for this work without taking on double faculty loads.</p><p>Blain addresses mentoring support beyond tenure, especially for women faculty of color. In addition to providing professional resources, Blain's chapter creates space for chairs to consider what this mentoring looks like at the department or local level.</p><p>Hoover's interview drawing on lived experience in economics prompts chairs to consider how biased and harmful norms about faculty and their work manifest and what role chairs play in disrupting these norms, supporting faculty, and allowing faculty talents and intellectual contributions to flourish.</p><p>The significance of visibility is consistently reinforced in part 1, including in Fong's exploration of “muted invisibility” (p. 66) through intersectional racialized experiences as an Asian American woman and contingent faculty in a predominantly white field, and in Winn's interview through the persistent dualism of racism that results in “invisibility” or “hypervisibility” (p. 85). Chairs will find much to work with in mentoring faculty through the kinds of coaching questions that Winn shares (see pages 89, 98, 99).</p><p>Extending this discussion of invisibility and its implications, opening part 2, Dutt-Ballerstadt explores responses to the #BlackInTheIvory hashtag created in June 2020, “detailing the myriad ways that Black scholars, scholarship, and excellence have been undermined and undervalued” (p. 106).</p><p>In the next chapter, Zape-Tah-Hol-Ah Starr Minthorn provides actionable steps and language for addressing the “invisibilization of Indigenous people” with strategies for “center[ing] our (Indigenous) voices and experiences” (p. 119). Significant for chairs and other administrators, the author points to missed opportunities in land acknowledgments for meaningful action (p. 120) and advocates for increased efforts to build relationships with Indigenous communities “and creat[e] safe spaces for Native students on campus” (p. 127).</p><p>Exploring ableism within a disability studies framework, Manchanda's chapter is especially relevant for chairs actively working to grow, diversify, and increase the accessibility of graduate programming.</p><p>In “Dealing with Sexual Harassment as a Junior Black Woman Scholar,” Buggs issues a direct call to action: “Advisers and department
第241页),丹尼斯强调需要支持,扩大,并使这种承诺和工作可见,这是主席指导和领导的重要组成部分。作为对当前学术对话的重要干预,这本合集是系主任必不可少的读物。由肯尼索州立大学英语和跨学科研究教授莱蒂齐亚·古列尔莫(Letizia Guglielmo)审阅。邮箱:[Email protected]
{"title":"Conditionally Accepted: Navigating Higher Education from the Margins","authors":"Eric Joy Denise,&nbsp;Bertin M. Louis","doi":"10.1002/dch.70016","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dch.70016","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;University of Texas Press, 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;256 pp., $34.95&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For department chairs working with marginalized and minoritized faculty, graduate students, and emerging scholars across career stages, this book offers implementable strategies, best practices, and concrete language for supporting, valuing, and amplifying the work of minoritized colleagues.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In part 1, contributors explore mentoring and visibility. Castor and Louis Jr., for example, offer strategies for supporting faculty in navigating joint appointments across multiple departments or programs, prompting home department chairs to remain mindful of supporting faculty in receiving credit for this work without taking on double faculty loads.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Blain addresses mentoring support beyond tenure, especially for women faculty of color. In addition to providing professional resources, Blain's chapter creates space for chairs to consider what this mentoring looks like at the department or local level.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hoover's interview drawing on lived experience in economics prompts chairs to consider how biased and harmful norms about faculty and their work manifest and what role chairs play in disrupting these norms, supporting faculty, and allowing faculty talents and intellectual contributions to flourish.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The significance of visibility is consistently reinforced in part 1, including in Fong's exploration of “muted invisibility” (p. 66) through intersectional racialized experiences as an Asian American woman and contingent faculty in a predominantly white field, and in Winn's interview through the persistent dualism of racism that results in “invisibility” or “hypervisibility” (p. 85). Chairs will find much to work with in mentoring faculty through the kinds of coaching questions that Winn shares (see pages 89, 98, 99).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Extending this discussion of invisibility and its implications, opening part 2, Dutt-Ballerstadt explores responses to the #BlackInTheIvory hashtag created in June 2020, “detailing the myriad ways that Black scholars, scholarship, and excellence have been undermined and undervalued” (p. 106).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the next chapter, Zape-Tah-Hol-Ah Starr Minthorn provides actionable steps and language for addressing the “invisibilization of Indigenous people” with strategies for “center[ing] our (Indigenous) voices and experiences” (p. 119). Significant for chairs and other administrators, the author points to missed opportunities in land acknowledgments for meaningful action (p. 120) and advocates for increased efforts to build relationships with Indigenous communities “and creat[e] safe spaces for Native students on campus” (p. 127).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Exploring ableism within a disability studies framework, Manchanda's chapter is especially relevant for chairs actively working to grow, diversify, and increase the accessibility of graduate programming.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In “Dealing with Sexual Harassment as a Junior Black Woman Scholar,” Buggs issues a direct call to action: “Advisers and department","PeriodicalId":101228,"journal":{"name":"The Department Chair","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dch.70016","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146136646","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Leading Through the Fog: How Chairs Can Anticipate and Align During Institutional Change 在迷雾中领导:主席如何在制度变革中预测和协调
Pub Date : 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1002/dch.70012
Kerri Richardson, Kelly Wester
<p>We are witnessing some never before seen occurrences in higher education. Whether it is a mandate coming from your state or executive orders coming from the government, it is important to think clearly and holistically about academia and to not lose sight of what we do, which is to educate. It can be easy to be overwhelmed by the stress of the onslaught of events, requests, and reactions. Yet, although it is important to remain calm and not lose sight of what we do as educators (and as department chairs to assist our faculty), it is also important to think strategically and, if possible, proactively.</p><p>In the case of our institution, we recently experienced an academic program review in which every unit on campus underwent a thorough analysis of our offerings. Although we are not the only campus to undergo this event, there were some nuances on our campus and within our unit. Our unit used an approach in which our leadership team worked together to analyze various dashboards provided to us by our university.</p><p>Although not a particularly fun process, we both felt prepared to engage in meaningful discussions because of our anticipatory leadership styles. What exactly is an anticipatory leadership style? Stated simply, it is a style that includes paying consistent attention to student enrollment and trends, listening to faculty feedback, partnering with upper administrators to understand yearly data, and collaborating with other chairs. It also includes making strategic decisions and actions based on these conversations and collaborations in ways that will impact programmatic and departmental data when events such as an academic program review take place. This anticipatory leadership style also uses certain practical elements, which you can define for yourself.</p><p>In our case, the practical elements fall under the umbrella of professional programs, one in teacher education and the other in counselor education. Each of our programs includes accreditation considerations from outside agencies as well as a host of metrics from inside the university, hence the practical portion of what we do.</p><p>As department chairs, we made informed decisions and implemented changes prior to and during academic program review, ahead of the budget reductions. Stated differently, we focused on student credit hour generation, student enrollment, less spending on part-time lecturers, and more instructional/supervisory opportunities for doctoral students and full-time faculty.</p><p>In the case of our teacher education program, we used the COVID-19 pandemic as a marker of significant upcoming change. On a campus of 18,000, 51 percent of whom are first-generation college students, 54 percent are people of color, and 57 percent receive Pell grants, we knew a significant enrollment drop was about to occur, and up until that point, we had been using an expensive model of educating and supervising preservice teachers. The old model was excellent in many ways, bu
我们正在目睹高等教育中前所未有的现象。无论是来自你所在州的命令还是来自政府的行政命令,重要的是要对学术界进行清晰而全面的思考,不要忽视我们的工作,那就是教育。我们很容易被事件、请求和反应的冲击所带来的压力压垮。然而,尽管保持冷静、不忽视我们作为教育者(以及作为协助教员的系主任)的工作很重要,但战略性思考也很重要,如果可能的话,积极主动地思考也很重要。就我们学院而言,我们最近经历了一次学术课程审查,校园里的每个单元都对我们提供的课程进行了彻底的分析。虽然我们并不是唯一一个经历这一事件的校园,但我们的校园和我们的单位内部都有一些细微的差别。我们的单位使用了一种方法,我们的领导团队一起工作来分析我们大学提供给我们的各种仪表板。虽然这不是一个特别有趣的过程,但我们都觉得准备好了参与有意义的讨论,因为我们的预期式领导风格。预见性领导风格到底是什么?简单地说,这是一种风格,包括持续关注学生的入学情况和趋势,听取教师的反馈,与高层管理人员合作了解年度数据,并与其他主席合作。它还包括在这些对话和合作的基础上制定战略决策和行动,这些决策和行动将在学术项目审查等事件发生时影响项目和部门数据。这种预见性领导风格也使用了一些你可以自己定义的实际元素。在我们的案例中,实践元素属于专业课程的保护伞下,一个是教师教育,另一个是咨询师教育。我们的每个项目都包括外部机构的认证考虑以及大学内部的一系列指标,因此我们所做的实际部分。作为系主任,我们在学术项目审查之前和期间做出了明智的决定,并在预算削减之前实施了改革。换句话说,我们关注的是学生学分的产生、学生入学、减少兼职讲师的支出,以及为博士生和全职教师提供更多的教学/监督机会。在我们的教师教育项目中,我们将COVID-19大流行作为即将发生重大变化的标志。在一个1.8万名学生的校园里,51%是第一代大学生,54%是有色人种,57%接受佩尔助学金,我们知道入学率将大幅下降,在那之前,我们一直在使用一种昂贵的模式来教育和监督职前教师。旧的模式在很多方面都很出色,但我们制定了一个流程,通知教员我们可能面临的一场金融危机,并开始对话。委员会成立了,教师被授权设计一种新的模式,导致更多的教师参与,这导致兼职和全职讲师的预算大幅减少。在上级行政部门评估这些削减之前,该部将这些削减作为一个集体进行。在我们只招收研究生的咨询师教育项目中,认证标准有严格的师生比例。因此,我们知道我们的学生注册和学分生产是有上限的。因此,我们需要找到一种不同的方式来增加学生的学分产生和入学率,而不影响我们的认证比例。通过教师合作,这导致创建了额外的本科课程和辅修课程,将由我们的博士生导师和学士学位后项目教授。这两个项目都被认为对学生群体很重要,不仅考虑到学生在疫情后的需求、心理健康要求和专业培训,而且从机构数据的角度来看,包括学分和学生入学生产数据,这些数据被用来制定校园预算决策。特别是考虑到我们州的研究生资助模式正在转变为全面削减,研究生和本科生之间没有区别。在分析我们的工作时,我们意识到尽管我们的程序非常不同,但我们的过程非常相似。由于我们发现了许多交叉点,我们认为在2025年学术主席会议上分享我们的经验是很重要的。在那里,我们提出了一个规划模型,即协作预期对齐计划(CAAP),我们认为任何主席都可以适应他们特定的学生、学术、部门和项目需求。 下面是你在准备任何重大改变时的三个必要行动的描述。尽管五年前我们没有正式的CAAP逐步流程,但我们都和我们的项目教师一起使用了这个流程。通过对挑战及其对我们的项目和部门的潜在影响保持透明,与教师进行真正的共享治理时,我们发现教师们愿意参与头脑风暴过程,提出可以作为解决方案的多种想法。其中一些想法是短期解决办法,可以立即解决即将出现的问题,而其他已确定的解决办法则是更长期的解决办法,目前仍在考虑之中。通过合作,教师们已经在我们的预期范围内接受了这个过程和变化,并与大学和我们的项目的需求保持一致。在反思的过程中,我们为协作预期校准计划概述和发展了之前的问题,以帮助我们自己和他人在这些动荡和不断变化的时代中导航。高等教育机构面临着不断的变化,这使得系主任的职位既复杂又具有强大的影响力。在这里,我们提供了一种方法,将协作领导与前瞻性决策以及与机构和计划需求相结合。我们的合作预期调整计划作为一个灵活的框架,可以帮助您在变化时期与您的教师和领导团队建立有意义的关系。该模型使您能够制定包括同事积极参与的计划,而不是只考虑他们的需求的计划。大学的使命包括提供教育、进行研究和从事公共服务,以培养对社会有贡献的个人。考虑到大学面临的前所未有的变化和挑战,推动入学率下降,经济转变,学生需求和人口结构的变化,通过有意的规划,参与合作并发展伙伴关系,共同领导比以往任何时候都更加迫切。我们的集体经验表明,复杂的体制变革需要明确的目标和共同的目标。这篇文章是基于学术主席年度会议上的演讲,该会议将于2025年2月5-7日在印第安纳州的印第安纳波利斯举行。克里·理查森(Kerri Richardson)是北卡罗来纳大学格林斯博罗分校教师教育和高等教育主席,凯利·韦斯特(Kelly Wester)是北卡罗来纳大学咨询和教育发展教授兼主席。邮箱:[Email protected], [Email protected]
{"title":"Leading Through the Fog: How Chairs Can Anticipate and Align During Institutional Change","authors":"Kerri Richardson,&nbsp;Kelly Wester","doi":"10.1002/dch.70012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dch.70012","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;We are witnessing some never before seen occurrences in higher education. Whether it is a mandate coming from your state or executive orders coming from the government, it is important to think clearly and holistically about academia and to not lose sight of what we do, which is to educate. It can be easy to be overwhelmed by the stress of the onslaught of events, requests, and reactions. Yet, although it is important to remain calm and not lose sight of what we do as educators (and as department chairs to assist our faculty), it is also important to think strategically and, if possible, proactively.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the case of our institution, we recently experienced an academic program review in which every unit on campus underwent a thorough analysis of our offerings. Although we are not the only campus to undergo this event, there were some nuances on our campus and within our unit. Our unit used an approach in which our leadership team worked together to analyze various dashboards provided to us by our university.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Although not a particularly fun process, we both felt prepared to engage in meaningful discussions because of our anticipatory leadership styles. What exactly is an anticipatory leadership style? Stated simply, it is a style that includes paying consistent attention to student enrollment and trends, listening to faculty feedback, partnering with upper administrators to understand yearly data, and collaborating with other chairs. It also includes making strategic decisions and actions based on these conversations and collaborations in ways that will impact programmatic and departmental data when events such as an academic program review take place. This anticipatory leadership style also uses certain practical elements, which you can define for yourself.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In our case, the practical elements fall under the umbrella of professional programs, one in teacher education and the other in counselor education. Each of our programs includes accreditation considerations from outside agencies as well as a host of metrics from inside the university, hence the practical portion of what we do.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As department chairs, we made informed decisions and implemented changes prior to and during academic program review, ahead of the budget reductions. Stated differently, we focused on student credit hour generation, student enrollment, less spending on part-time lecturers, and more instructional/supervisory opportunities for doctoral students and full-time faculty.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the case of our teacher education program, we used the COVID-19 pandemic as a marker of significant upcoming change. On a campus of 18,000, 51 percent of whom are first-generation college students, 54 percent are people of color, and 57 percent receive Pell grants, we knew a significant enrollment drop was about to occur, and up until that point, we had been using an expensive model of educating and supervising preservice teachers. The old model was excellent in many ways, bu","PeriodicalId":101228,"journal":{"name":"The Department Chair","volume":"36 3","pages":"16-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dch.70012","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146140077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Academic Leadership from Ten Thousand Feet or Under a Rock? Finding the Right Elevation Through Empathy 一万英尺下还是岩石下的学术领导?通过同理心找到正确的提升
Pub Date : 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1002/dch.70008
Lisa K. Hanasono, W. John Koolage, Mary-Jon Ludy, M. Elise Radina, Jerry C. Schnepp, Jolie A. Sheffer
<p>We've all been there: A new mandate from senior leadership requires swift operationalization. Time and resources are limited. Department chairs must translate top-down decisions into meaningful actions that align with the institutional mission and prioritize student success. But there are constraints and obstacles in place that may not be apparent to upper administration. Here we attempt to unpack the distinct perspectives and roles that chairs and associate deans have in making change on campus to chart a path toward more productive collaboration.</p><p>Using a Dear Colleague approach, our goal is to clarify the priorities of chairs versus assistant/associate deans in the hopes of helping colleagues better understand one another's perspectives. Although both roles are essential to the academic mission, they often operate at different organizational altitudes. Chairs are embedded in the daily life of departments, managing personnel, supporting faculty and students, and keeping programs running smoothly. Associate deans, on the other hand, are tasked with implementing broader strategic initiatives, ensuring compliance with institutional goals, and reporting progress up the chain of command. These distinct vantage points can sometimes lead to friction, especially when decisions made at one level seem to disrupt the delicate balance of responsibilities at another. If we can empathize and communicate more effectively across our academic leader roles, we can collaborate and problem-solve more productively. Consider the following email exchanges.</p><p><i>Dear Associate Dean,</i></p><p><i>As you might have anticipated, I am writing to express some deep concerns about the “new” fall course scheduling process. It is frustrating to receive half-baked mandates with unrealistic deadlines from the college. I am not sure you recall how difficult it is to change department culture.</i></p><p><i>Obviously, difficulties with the new scheduling process will vary by department, but we have some particularly rigid, but also quite important, faculty. Professor William Granderman, world leader in thaumaturgy studies, is just one example. His expectation, as with many senior faculty, is to maintain a two-day-a-week teaching schedule. This is necessary to maintain his research productivity. I am sure I don't have to remind you how important his grants are.</i></p><p><i>With a course schedule that has to be live for students by this Friday, I am begging for leniency with respect to the new schedule development process. I am confident that with a few more semesters, I can move our department culture, but I can't transform faculty overnight.</i></p><p><i>I know it's been several years since you transitioned from depart</i><i>ment chair to associate dean. Is there no way to phase in the new pro</i><i>cess, permitting time for faculty to adjust?</i></p><p><i>Help me be helped by you.</i></p><p><i>Sincerely,</i></p><p><i>Beleaguered Chair</i></p><p><i>Dear Chair,</i></p><
我们都有过这样的经历:高层领导的新任务需要迅速实施。时间和资源是有限的。系主任必须将自上而下的决定转化为有意义的行动,与机构使命保持一致,优先考虑学生的成功。但也存在一些限制和障碍,而这些限制和障碍可能不会被上层政府察觉。在这里,我们试图揭示主席和副院长在校园变革中所扮演的不同视角和角色,以规划一条通往更富有成效的合作之路。使用“亲爱的同事”方法,我们的目标是澄清主席与助理/副院长的优先级,希望帮助同事更好地理解彼此的观点。尽管这两个角色对于学术使命都是必不可少的,但它们通常在不同的组织高度上运作。椅子嵌入到部门的日常生活中,管理人员,支持教师和学生,并保持项目顺利进行。另一方面,副院长的任务是实施更广泛的战略举措,确保符合机构目标,并向上级汇报进展情况。这些独特的优势有时会导致摩擦,特别是当一个级别的决策似乎破坏了另一个级别的微妙责任平衡时。如果我们能在学术领导角色中更有效地交流,我们就能更有效地合作和解决问题。考虑以下的电子邮件交流。正如你所预料的,我写这封信是为了表达对“新的”秋季课程安排过程的一些深切关注。从学校收到不成熟的授权和不切实际的截止日期是令人沮丧的。我不确定你是否还记得改变部门文化有多困难。显然,新的日程安排过程的困难会因系而异,但我们有一些特别严格,但也非常重要的教员。威廉·格兰德曼(William Granderman)教授是世界上医学研究的领军人物,他就是其中一个例子。和许多资深教师一样,他的期望是维持每周两天的教学计划。这对于保持他的研究效率是必要的。我相信我不需要提醒你他的资助有多重要。由于课程安排必须在本周五之前发布给学生,我请求对新的时间表制定过程给予宽大处理。我相信,再过几个学期,我就能改变我们系的文化,但我不可能在一夜之间改变教员。我知道你从系主任升任副院长已经有好几年了。难道就没有办法分阶段实施新流程,让教员有时间适应吗?帮助我得到你的帮助。亲爱的主席,感谢您分享您对新课程安排流程的担忧。我明白这迫使你们改变既定的做法,但让我们面对现实——这是确保机构长期健康的必要条件。最终,这是为了满足不同学生群体的需求,而不仅仅是迎合我们资深教师的一时兴起。让我提醒你们,在过去的五年里,我们一直在谈论如何优化教室的使用。如你所知,我们学院正面临招生挑战,我们必须满足所有学习者的需求,包括那些想要夜校和在线课程的非传统学生。这不是新闻。这不是“一夜之间改变……文化”。是时候采取行动了。这个新的日程安排过程将在各部门、院系、教师职业阶段和级别之间创造更大的公平。我认识到,这些做法的过渡将是困难的,但缓慢推进这些变化不会帮助我们到达我们需要去的地方。事实上,如果我们不能更有效地利用现有资源,我们将被迫进行伤害更大、目标更少的削减。所以,除非你和你系里的老师想看到更严厉的措施,我建议你加入。至于你的抱怨和不成熟的命令,欢迎来到管理部门。感谢您的理解与合作。恼怒的副院长:这种电子邮件交流对我们大多数人来说应该很熟悉。主席对新的日程安排过程感到沮丧。这是可以理解的,因为他们在紧迫的时间内工作,并努力解决相互竞争的需求,以制定满足学生需求的课程时间表,满足教员同事的喜好,并改变部门的文化。副院长对他们认为的拖延和不必要的拖延感到沮丧,因为这是一个常识性的解决方案。双方对各自的关切都是正确的,但都以自己的优先事项为中心,没有帮助解决对方的问题。为了更有成效地前进,他们必须认识到他们都在同一个团队中。
{"title":"Academic Leadership from Ten Thousand Feet or Under a Rock? Finding the Right Elevation Through Empathy","authors":"Lisa K. Hanasono,&nbsp;W. John Koolage,&nbsp;Mary-Jon Ludy,&nbsp;M. Elise Radina,&nbsp;Jerry C. Schnepp,&nbsp;Jolie A. Sheffer","doi":"10.1002/dch.70008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dch.70008","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;We've all been there: A new mandate from senior leadership requires swift operationalization. Time and resources are limited. Department chairs must translate top-down decisions into meaningful actions that align with the institutional mission and prioritize student success. But there are constraints and obstacles in place that may not be apparent to upper administration. Here we attempt to unpack the distinct perspectives and roles that chairs and associate deans have in making change on campus to chart a path toward more productive collaboration.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Using a Dear Colleague approach, our goal is to clarify the priorities of chairs versus assistant/associate deans in the hopes of helping colleagues better understand one another's perspectives. Although both roles are essential to the academic mission, they often operate at different organizational altitudes. Chairs are embedded in the daily life of departments, managing personnel, supporting faculty and students, and keeping programs running smoothly. Associate deans, on the other hand, are tasked with implementing broader strategic initiatives, ensuring compliance with institutional goals, and reporting progress up the chain of command. These distinct vantage points can sometimes lead to friction, especially when decisions made at one level seem to disrupt the delicate balance of responsibilities at another. If we can empathize and communicate more effectively across our academic leader roles, we can collaborate and problem-solve more productively. Consider the following email exchanges.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Dear Associate Dean,&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;As you might have anticipated, I am writing to express some deep concerns about the “new” fall course scheduling process. It is frustrating to receive half-baked mandates with unrealistic deadlines from the college. I am not sure you recall how difficult it is to change department culture.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Obviously, difficulties with the new scheduling process will vary by department, but we have some particularly rigid, but also quite important, faculty. Professor William Granderman, world leader in thaumaturgy studies, is just one example. His expectation, as with many senior faculty, is to maintain a two-day-a-week teaching schedule. This is necessary to maintain his research productivity. I am sure I don't have to remind you how important his grants are.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;With a course schedule that has to be live for students by this Friday, I am begging for leniency with respect to the new schedule development process. I am confident that with a few more semesters, I can move our department culture, but I can't transform faculty overnight.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;I know it's been several years since you transitioned from depart&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;ment chair to associate dean. Is there no way to phase in the new pro&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;cess, permitting time for faculty to adjust?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Help me be helped by you.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Sincerely,&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Beleaguered Chair&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Dear Chair,&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;","PeriodicalId":101228,"journal":{"name":"The Department Chair","volume":"36 3","pages":"9-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dch.70008","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146148298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Toolbox for Deans: Essential Advice for Academic Leaders 院长的工具箱:给学术领袖的重要建议
Pub Date : 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1002/dch.70017
<p>The Chronicle of Higher Education, 2024</p><p>68 pp., $59.00</p><p>Being a dean requires incredible multitasking skills, savvy relationship-building tools, and minute-by-minute problem-solving. <i>A Toolbox for Deans: Essential Advice for</i> <i>Academic Leaders</i> is an excellent resource for current deans, department chairs, aspiring administrators, and deans moving to new roles and organizations. This book is easy to read and gives digestible tips on how to manage things like meetings, data, and the constant push and pull of being in the faculty world and the administrator world (sections 1 and 4). This collection of articles represents several authors and perspectives on areas like mentoring, imposter syndrome, and building social and political capital (section 2).</p><p>I've worked in two different state systems in Colorado and Minnesota. My dean roles have been only in community colleges, and I also taught in a university for more than five years. I collaborated closely with chairs and faculty for about ten years before becoming a dean. I work hard to be a scholar-practitioner, presenting at conferences at least once a year, working on my PhD, and contributing to publications. My expertise is so far outside of what the faculty teach, and I am one of few females on the team. I'm always learning, asking questions, and providing guidance based on my teaching style that can apply to many areas. This toolbox hits on the importance of building relationships through things like thoughtfully planned retreats, how to train and build leaders, and the importance of running a good meeting (section 4). All of these are tasks I work on daily in a variety of contexts.</p><p>It's critical to consider several areas before entering into a dean role, such as an honest look at the budget; the role of collective bargaining contracts; an overview of recent accreditation visits; the level of support you'll receive from deans in the institution, within the system, and from the key campus decision-makers; how the institution has handled change and overcome challenges; and the roles deans play in all levels of leadership. As Akakawa notes in the “Dare to Lead” article, “In applying for leadership positions, it's important to carefully reflect on how your experiences and skills may (or may not) align with an institution's expectations and opportunities for leadership” (p. 20).</p><p>This toolbox provides an overview of the dean's role as well as powerful questions to ask about the position. Running meetings, finding solid mentors, and knowing the boundaries and nuances of your faculty and organization are key. As Anft describes in his article, getting off to a strong start is critical in a new role. I spent the first year really listening, and it has helped me build relationships in many areas.</p><p>Another essential skill set needed by deans is project management. I often call myself the dean of whatever comes my way, and flexibility is key. It's also critical
《高等教育纪事报》(Chronicle of Higher Education), 202468页,59.00美元。作为一名院长,需要出色的多任务处理能力、精明的人际关系建立工具,以及分分秒秒解决问题的能力。《院长工具箱:学术领袖的基本建议》是一本优秀的资源,适用于现任院长、系主任、有抱负的管理人员和即将担任新角色和组织的院长。这本书很容易阅读,并提供了一些易于理解的建议,比如如何管理会议、数据,以及在教员世界和管理员世界中不断的推拉(第1和第4部分)。这篇文章的集合代表了几位作者对指导、冒名顶替综合症以及建立社会和政治资本等领域的观点(第2部分)。我在科罗拉多州和明尼苏达州两个不同的州系统工作过。我的院长职位只在社区学院,我也在大学里教了五年多的书。在成为院长之前,我与主席和教职员工密切合作了大约10年。我努力成为一名学者实践者,每年至少在会议上发表一次演讲,攻读博士学位,并为出版物撰稿。我的专业知识远远超出了老师们所教的范围,而且我是团队中为数不多的女性之一。我总是在学习,提出问题,并根据我的教学风格提供指导,这可以应用于许多领域。这个工具箱强调了建立人际关系的重要性,比如精心策划的务虚会,如何培训和培养领导者,以及组织一场好的会议的重要性(第4部分)。所有这些都是我每天在各种环境下工作的任务。在担任院长之前,考虑几个方面是至关重要的,比如诚实地看待预算;集体谈判合同的作用;最近的认证访问概述;你将从学院院长、系统内部以及校园主要决策者那里得到多少支持;该机构如何应对变化和克服挑战;以及院长在各级领导中所扮演的角色。正如Akakawa在“敢于领导”的文章中指出的那样,“在申请领导职位时,仔细思考你的经验和技能是否符合机构的期望和领导机会是很重要的”(第20页)。这个工具箱提供了院长角色的概述,以及关于该职位的有力问题。召开会议,寻找可靠的导师,了解你的教员和组织的界限和细微差别是关键。正如安弗特在他的文章中所描述的那样,在一个新的角色中,有一个良好的开端是至关重要的。第一年我真的在倾听,这帮助我在很多方面建立了人际关系。院长们需要的另一项基本技能是项目管理。无论遇到什么,我都称自己为“院长”,而灵活性是关键。跟踪项目、流程、时间表和任务的数量,并找到那些可以帮助你跟踪和组织的人,这一点也很重要。我喜欢读其他院长的建议,他们认为这个职位可能不适合他们,或者相反,这是他们可以享受的(第1和3部分)。我曾与一些管理者共事过,他们回到教师岗位,发现他们喜欢这种节奏和进行大规模变革的能力,现在一所私立大学的主席也是如此。跟随、面试以及与其他院长的交流都有助于了解这份工作。我想说的是,这本书缺少了院长对教师、学生和校园文化的影响。院长可以通过提供指导、专业发展和支持系统,以强有力的方式影响教师和学生。有一位老师告诉我:“你对我们很尊重,很有尊严,这让我专注于支持和关心我班上的学生。”作为一名院长,重要的是要看看你能为教员提供什么资源。是否有唾手可得的成果可以让你鼓舞士气,支持你的愿景?院长们常常在幕后帮助别人发光发热。尽管困难重重,但我们将继续致力于解决冲突,如何在增长和挑战的时代建立关系,以及如何在公平实践方面最好地教育教师。就像珀尔马特在《你做的事重要吗?》一书中指出的那样,在场、出现、深入研究工作真的很重要。新冠肺炎疫情导致高等教育发生了巨大变化,在如何帮助管理教职员工(包括院长)的职业倦怠方面,我们还有很多工作要做。高层领导必须与院长保持联系,帮助他们提高工作满意度,评估工作水平和倦怠程度。整个行业如何做出一些调整来支持这些重要角色?这本书是一个很好的开始。由圣保罗学院贸易与技术学院院长VA Hayman Barber审阅。邮箱:[Email protected]
{"title":"A Toolbox for Deans: Essential Advice for Academic Leaders","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/dch.70017","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dch.70017","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The Chronicle of Higher Education, 2024&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;68 pp., $59.00&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Being a dean requires incredible multitasking skills, savvy relationship-building tools, and minute-by-minute problem-solving. &lt;i&gt;A Toolbox for Deans: Essential Advice for&lt;/i&gt; &lt;i&gt;Academic Leaders&lt;/i&gt; is an excellent resource for current deans, department chairs, aspiring administrators, and deans moving to new roles and organizations. This book is easy to read and gives digestible tips on how to manage things like meetings, data, and the constant push and pull of being in the faculty world and the administrator world (sections 1 and 4). This collection of articles represents several authors and perspectives on areas like mentoring, imposter syndrome, and building social and political capital (section 2).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've worked in two different state systems in Colorado and Minnesota. My dean roles have been only in community colleges, and I also taught in a university for more than five years. I collaborated closely with chairs and faculty for about ten years before becoming a dean. I work hard to be a scholar-practitioner, presenting at conferences at least once a year, working on my PhD, and contributing to publications. My expertise is so far outside of what the faculty teach, and I am one of few females on the team. I'm always learning, asking questions, and providing guidance based on my teaching style that can apply to many areas. This toolbox hits on the importance of building relationships through things like thoughtfully planned retreats, how to train and build leaders, and the importance of running a good meeting (section 4). All of these are tasks I work on daily in a variety of contexts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's critical to consider several areas before entering into a dean role, such as an honest look at the budget; the role of collective bargaining contracts; an overview of recent accreditation visits; the level of support you'll receive from deans in the institution, within the system, and from the key campus decision-makers; how the institution has handled change and overcome challenges; and the roles deans play in all levels of leadership. As Akakawa notes in the “Dare to Lead” article, “In applying for leadership positions, it's important to carefully reflect on how your experiences and skills may (or may not) align with an institution's expectations and opportunities for leadership” (p. 20).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This toolbox provides an overview of the dean's role as well as powerful questions to ask about the position. Running meetings, finding solid mentors, and knowing the boundaries and nuances of your faculty and organization are key. As Anft describes in his article, getting off to a strong start is critical in a new role. I spent the first year really listening, and it has helped me build relationships in many areas.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another essential skill set needed by deans is project management. I often call myself the dean of whatever comes my way, and flexibility is key. It's also critical ","PeriodicalId":101228,"journal":{"name":"The Department Chair","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dch.70017","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146136559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Burt v. Fuchs et al. Burt v. Fuchs等。
Pub Date : 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1002/dch.70020

Case: Burt v. Fuchs et al., No. 1:22cv75 (N.D. Fla. 06/21/23)

Ruling: The US District Court, Northern District of Florida, dismissed a claim in a suit against the University of Florida president and other administrators.

Significance: A professor employed by a state university doesn't have a right of free speech with respect to statements he makes pursuant to his official duties.

Summary: The plaintiff was a tenured UF English professor. One day before classes were to begin in August 2021, the plaintiff sent an email to the students scheduled to attend his upcoming classes, stating that he had been ordered to teach face-to-face instead of remotely and that it was against his will to teach in person because of the possibility of contracting COVID-19. The email also included reproductions of an email string between himself and the department chair on the subject.

In January 2022, both the dean and the department chair sent a letter to the plaintiff accusing him of misconduct because the August 2021 email was improper, unprofessional, provocative, and adversarial. The letter also directed him to make student-related communications professional and to take courses in email effectiveness and cultivating judgment. The letter concluded by stating that any future violations would result in the termination of his employment.

The plaintiff filed a suit against the president and others, and one of his claims was a violation of the First Amendment. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the email wasn't protected because it had been sent pursuant to his responsibilities as a public employee.

The district court judge said that a government employee had no right of free speech with respect to statements he made as a part of his official duties. He then dismissed the claim, ruling that the August 2021 email was sent pursuant to the plaintiff's official duties because it dealt with the format of the courses he was employed to teach and went only to those students who were going to be in his classes.

案例:Burt v. Fuchs et al., No. 1:22cv75 (n.d Fla. 06/21/23)裁决:美国佛罗里达北区地方法院驳回了对佛罗里达大学校长和其他管理人员的诉讼请求。意义:被州立大学聘用的教授没有言论自由的权利,因为他是根据自己的职责发表言论的。原告是佛罗里达大学的终身英语教授。在2021年8月开学的前一天,原告给预定参加他即将到来的课程的学生发了一封电子邮件,称他被要求面对面授课,而不是远程授课,而且由于有可能感染COVID-19,亲自授课违背了他的意愿。这封电子邮件还包括他和系主任之间关于这个主题的电子邮件的副本。2022年1月,院长和系主任都给原告发了一封信,指控他行为不端,因为2021年8月的那封电子邮件不恰当、不专业、具有挑衅性和对抗性。这封信还要求他将与学生有关的沟通变得专业化,并参加电子邮件有效性和培养判断力的课程。这封信最后指出,今后任何违反规定的行为都将导致他被解雇。原告对总统和其他人提起诉讼,其中一项指控违反了宪法第一修正案。被告提出了驳回的动议,辩称这封电子邮件不受保护,因为它是根据他作为公职人员的职责发送的。地区法院法官说,一名政府雇员没有言论自由的权利,就他作为公务的一部分所作的陈述而言。他随后驳回了这一指控,裁定这封2021年8月的电子邮件是根据原告的公务发送的,因为它涉及到他受雇教授的课程的格式,并且只发给了那些将要上他的课的学生。
{"title":"Burt v. Fuchs et al.","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/dch.70020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dch.70020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Case:</b> <i>Burt v. Fuchs et al.</i>, No. 1:22cv75 (N.D. Fla. 06/21/23)</p><p><b>Ruling:</b> The US District Court, Northern District of Florida, dismissed a claim in a suit against the University of Florida president and other administrators.</p><p><b>Significance:</b> A professor employed by a state university doesn't have a right of free speech with respect to statements he makes pursuant to his official duties.</p><p><b>Summary:</b> The plaintiff was a tenured UF English professor. One day before classes were to begin in August 2021, the plaintiff sent an email to the students scheduled to attend his upcoming classes, stating that he had been ordered to teach face-to-face instead of remotely and that it was against his will to teach in person because of the possibility of contracting COVID-19. The email also included reproductions of an email string between himself and the department chair on the subject.</p><p>In January 2022, both the dean and the department chair sent a letter to the plaintiff accusing him of misconduct because the August 2021 email was improper, unprofessional, provocative, and adversarial. The letter also directed him to make student-related communications professional and to take courses in email effectiveness and cultivating judgment. The letter concluded by stating that any future violations would result in the termination of his employment.</p><p>The plaintiff filed a suit against the president and others, and one of his claims was a violation of the First Amendment. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the email wasn't protected because it had been sent pursuant to his responsibilities as a public employee.</p><p>The district court judge said that a government employee had no right of free speech with respect to statements he made as a part of his official duties. He then dismissed the claim, ruling that the August 2021 email was sent pursuant to the plaintiff's official duties because it dealt with the format of the courses he was employed to teach and went only to those students who were going to be in his classes.</p>","PeriodicalId":101228,"journal":{"name":"The Department Chair","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dch.70020","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146140079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ten Strategies for Preserving Faculty Morale During Institutional Transition 机构转型中保持教师士气的十大策略
Pub Date : 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1002/dch.70004
Elizabeth Davis-Berg, Jeanne Petrolle
<p>The precarity of the higher education sector endangers faculty morale. Declining enrollments, shrinking budgets, institutional reorganizations, attacks on diversity initiatives, and threats to free speech require knowledge workers to summon extraordinary resilience, endurance, adaptability, and creativity. Academic leaders need a repertoire of strategies for building and preserving faculty morale. This article shares ten strategies for morale-building, including collaborative grant writing and open educational resource building. Collaborative productivity mitigates faculty distress by reducing isolation and supporting the social and emotional energy necessary for successful adaptation to the increased stress of uncertainty.</p><p>Like many institutions, Columbia College Chicago, a four-year private arts and communications school in Chicago's south loop, faces numerous challenges to faculty vitality. As a Hispanic-serving institution in an urban environment, our institution, like many others, finds the current administration's hostility toward diversity initiatives and undocumented or recently documented students acutely challenging. Even before these latest threats to institutional vitality, the now proverbial demographic cliff, along with postpandemic reassessment of the value of college degrees, has resulted in lower enrollments and, therefore, declining travel budgets, fewer course releases, larger class sizes, and job uncertainty.</p><p>When I (Jeanne) unexpectedly stepped into an interim chair position in this context, the English department at my institution had been struggling for years to adjust to budgetary austerities. To complicate matters, our dean and provost had called for us to consider moving from a two-course first-year writing sequence to a core curriculum with just one required writing course—a shocking request for English department faculty. I wanted to shift what felt like reflex opposition and general unhappiness. What might make people feel excited and collaborative again? My answer: money that we control.</p><p>I worked with my first-year writing colleagues, librarians, development folks, and a biologist to apply for a US Department of Education grant to fund the creation of an open-access online writing textbook. Faculty were paid to write and build this textbook together (<i>Authoring Culture: The Foundations of Twenty-First Century Writing</i>). Getting paid and adding another peer reviewed publication to their vita made faculty readier to reimagine the first-year writing curriculum. Working with colleagues outside our department connected English faculty more deeply to other parts of the college community. We all worked closely with colleagues we barely knew before, which made us less lonely. We forged closer ties between adjunct faculty and tenured faculty—both groups of faculty worked on the book and both groups of faculty became eligible for travel funds to talk about the textbook. The next year, using the same m
高等教育部门的不稳定危及教师的士气。入学人数下降、预算缩减、机构重组、多样性倡议受到攻击以及言论自由受到威胁,都要求知识工作者具备非凡的韧性、忍耐力、适应能力和创造力。学术领袖需要一整套策略来建立和保持教员的士气。本文分享了十种建立士气的策略,包括合作拨款的撰写和开放教育资源的建设。通过减少孤立和支持成功适应不确定性增加的压力所必需的社会和情感能量,协作生产力减轻了教师的痛苦。像许多机构一样,芝加哥哥伦比亚学院(Columbia College Chicago)是一所位于芝加哥南部环线的四年制私立艺术和传播学院,它在师资活力方面面临着许多挑战。作为一个在城市环境中为西班牙裔服务的机构,我们的机构和许多其他机构一样,发现当前政府对多样性倡议和无证或最近有证学生的敌意极具挑战性。甚至在这些对机构活力的最新威胁之前,现在众所周知的人口悬崖,以及大流行后对大学学位价值的重新评估,已经导致入学率下降,因此,旅行预算下降,课程减少,班级规模扩大,就业不确定性增加。当我(珍妮)意外地在这种背景下担任临时主席时,我所在学院的英语系多年来一直在努力适应预算紧缩。更复杂的是,我们的院长和教务长要求我们考虑从第一年的两门写作课程改为核心课程,只有一门必修的写作课程——这对英语系教员来说是一个令人震惊的要求。我想要改变那种感觉像是反射性的对立和普遍的不快乐。什么能让人们再次感到兴奋和合作?我的回答是:我们控制的钱。我与一年级的写作同事、图书管理员、开发人员和一位生物学家一起申请了美国教育部的拨款,以资助创建一个开放获取的在线写作教科书。教师们受雇共同编写这本教材(《创作文化:二十一世纪写作的基础》)。获得报酬并在他们的简历中添加另一篇同行评议的出版物,使教师们更愿意重新构想第一年的写作课程。与系外同事的合作将英语教师与学院社区的其他部分更深入地联系起来。我们都与以前几乎不认识的同事密切合作,这让我们不那么孤独。我们在兼职教员和终身教员之间建立了更紧密的联系——两组教员都参与了这本书的编写,两组教员都有资格获得旅行基金来讨论这本教科书。第二年,使用相同的模型和类似的项目设计,我们的机构获得了一笔拨款来编写一本数学教科书。长期以来,学生们一直抱怨数学必修课程的课本太贵。在疫情期间,出版商免费提供了他们的作业软件。大流行后,教师不想回到不能向学生提供即时反馈的纸质作业。作为科学和数学系的新主任,我(贝丝)很快发现一些学生没有钱买书:学生们不及格是因为他们买不起书。教师们有机会创建一个免费的、开放获取的教科书,将解决数学教科书的费用问题。我说服教职员工和我一起写一份助学金,通过节省学生的钱和让教职员工控制自己的材料来改善学生的体验。一开始,教师们并不想申请资助。现在,同一批教员定期开会讨论这个项目,他们对我们开发了一个让学生如此直接受益的资源表示感谢。提高学生的负担能力和可及性可以激励教师。我们的数学教科书是一个复杂的项目,它帮助我们建立一个更加经济公平的未来,包括并支持那些买不起书的学生。此外,由于三个主要的数学课有一些共同的课程元素,编写这本教科书可以激发关于每个课的重要对话。如果没有这笔拨款,我们可能不会如此深入地讨论课程。我们还学习了使用Microsoft Teams、开放教育资源构建软件和辅助软件进行在线协作的新技能。在这个不确定的时期,投资企业给了我们一些积极的东西。想象积极的未来能维持一定程度的乐观,即使对没有直接参与资助的教员来说也是如此。我们并不是说我们学校的教职工士气都很好。 字典对士气的定义多种多样,包括热情、快乐、纪律和对使命的信念。士气是不可量化的,千变万化的,而且经常不受我们的管理控制。在我们学院,像许多学院一样,面临着真正令人生畏的挑战,尽管在会议上、社交媒体上和私下里表达不满,但大多数教师仍然给课堂带来了欢乐和非凡的热情。教职员工与主席和其他管理人员一起,对我们的课程进行了全面改革,重组了整个机构,并实施了重新设计的专业,这证明了教职员工对使命的持续信念。你今天在做什么来建立、重建、维持或加强教师士气?本文基于第81届美国学术院长年会的圆桌讨论,该会议于2025年2月19日至21日在亚利桑那州凤凰城举行。伊丽莎白·戴维斯-伯格(Elizabeth Davis-Berg)是生物学教授兼设计学院联席主任,珍妮·佩特勒(Jeanne Petrolle)是芝加哥哥伦比亚学院教务代理院长。邮箱:[Email protected], [Email protected]
{"title":"Ten Strategies for Preserving Faculty Morale During Institutional Transition","authors":"Elizabeth Davis-Berg,&nbsp;Jeanne Petrolle","doi":"10.1002/dch.70004","DOIUrl":"10.1002/dch.70004","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The precarity of the higher education sector endangers faculty morale. Declining enrollments, shrinking budgets, institutional reorganizations, attacks on diversity initiatives, and threats to free speech require knowledge workers to summon extraordinary resilience, endurance, adaptability, and creativity. Academic leaders need a repertoire of strategies for building and preserving faculty morale. This article shares ten strategies for morale-building, including collaborative grant writing and open educational resource building. Collaborative productivity mitigates faculty distress by reducing isolation and supporting the social and emotional energy necessary for successful adaptation to the increased stress of uncertainty.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Like many institutions, Columbia College Chicago, a four-year private arts and communications school in Chicago's south loop, faces numerous challenges to faculty vitality. As a Hispanic-serving institution in an urban environment, our institution, like many others, finds the current administration's hostility toward diversity initiatives and undocumented or recently documented students acutely challenging. Even before these latest threats to institutional vitality, the now proverbial demographic cliff, along with postpandemic reassessment of the value of college degrees, has resulted in lower enrollments and, therefore, declining travel budgets, fewer course releases, larger class sizes, and job uncertainty.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When I (Jeanne) unexpectedly stepped into an interim chair position in this context, the English department at my institution had been struggling for years to adjust to budgetary austerities. To complicate matters, our dean and provost had called for us to consider moving from a two-course first-year writing sequence to a core curriculum with just one required writing course—a shocking request for English department faculty. I wanted to shift what felt like reflex opposition and general unhappiness. What might make people feel excited and collaborative again? My answer: money that we control.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I worked with my first-year writing colleagues, librarians, development folks, and a biologist to apply for a US Department of Education grant to fund the creation of an open-access online writing textbook. Faculty were paid to write and build this textbook together (&lt;i&gt;Authoring Culture: The Foundations of Twenty-First Century Writing&lt;/i&gt;). Getting paid and adding another peer reviewed publication to their vita made faculty readier to reimagine the first-year writing curriculum. Working with colleagues outside our department connected English faculty more deeply to other parts of the college community. We all worked closely with colleagues we barely knew before, which made us less lonely. We forged closer ties between adjunct faculty and tenured faculty—both groups of faculty worked on the book and both groups of faculty became eligible for travel funds to talk about the textbook. The next year, using the same m","PeriodicalId":101228,"journal":{"name":"The Department Chair","volume":"36 3","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/dch.70004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146136561","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
The Department Chair
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1