Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-01-15DOI: 10.15441/ceem.24.331
Kyung Won Park, Sung Wook Song, Woo Jeong Kim, Jeong Ho Kang, Ji Hwan Bu, Sung Kgun Lee, Seo Young Ko, Soo Hoon Lee, Chang Bae Park, Jin Gu Lee, Jong Yeon Kang, Jaeyoon Ha, Jiwon Kim
Objective: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) often occurs alongside injuries to other body regions, worsening patient outcomes. This study evaluates the impact of concomitant injuries on clinical outcomes in patients with isolated versus non-isolated TBI.
Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional analysis was conducted using data from the Emergency Department-based Injury In-depth Surveillance (EDIIS) for 180,058 TBI patients admitted to 23 tertiary hospitals from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022. Patients were categorized into isolated TBI group (iTBI; n=127,673) and non-isolated TBI group (niTBI; n=52,385) based on injury diagnostic codes. Clinical outcomes-24-hour and 30-day mortality, hospital admission, and interhospital transfer-were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analyses adjusted for potential confounders were performed.
Results: The niTBI patients exhibited significantly higher 24-hour mortality (1.5% vs. 0.4%), 30-day mortality (2.6% vs. 1.0%), hospital admissions (24.5% vs. 8.4%), and interhospital transfers (3.6% vs. 1.1%) than iTBI patients (all P<0.001). Concomitant injuries increased the adjusted odds of 24-hour mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.456; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.286-1.648) and 30-day mortality (aOR, 1.111; 95% CI, 1.022-1.208). Thoracic injuries were the most significant predictor of adverse outcomes in niTBI patients, increasing the odds of 24-hour mortality by nearly sixfold (aOR, 5.958; 95% CI 5.057-7.019).
Conclusion: s: Concomitant injuries significantly worsen clinical outcomes in TBI patients, with thoracic injuries being the most critical predictor of mortality. These findings highlight the importance of comprehensive trauma assessments and targeted prevention strategies to improve survival rates and optimize resource allocation for patients with multiple injuries.
目的:创伤性脑损伤(TBI)经常与身体其他部位的损伤一起发生,使患者的预后恶化。本研究旨在评估并发损伤对孤立性与非孤立性TBI患者临床结果的影响。方法:采用基于急诊科的损伤深度监测系统(EDIIS)的数据进行回顾性横断面分析,其中包括2020年1月1日至2022年12月31日在23家三级医院住院的180,058例TBI患者。根据损伤诊断代码将患者分为孤立性TBI (iTBI, n = 127,673)和非孤立性TBI (niTBI, n = 52,385)组。临床结果——包括24小时和30天死亡率、住院率和院间转院率——进行比较。对潜在混杂因素进行调整后的多变量逻辑回归分析。结果:与iTBI患者相比,niTBI患者的24小时死亡率(1.5% vs. 0.4%)、30天死亡率(2.6% vs. 1.0%)、住院率(24.5% vs. 8.4%)和院间转院率(3.6% vs. 1.1%)显著高于iTBI患者(均p < 0.001)。伴发损伤增加24小时死亡率(aOR = 1.456;95% CI: 1.286-1.648)和30天死亡率(aOR = 1.111;95% ci: 1.022-1.208)。胸部损伤是niTBI患者不良结局最显著的预测因子,使24小时死亡率增加近6倍(aOR = 5.958;95% ci: 5.057-7.019)。结论:伴随损伤显著恶化TBI患者的临床结果,胸部损伤是死亡率最关键的预测指标。这些发现强调了综合创伤评估和有针对性的预防策略对提高多发性损伤患者的生存率和优化资源分配的重要性。
{"title":"Impact of concomitant injuries on clinical outcomes in patients with isolated versus non-isolated traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Kyung Won Park, Sung Wook Song, Woo Jeong Kim, Jeong Ho Kang, Ji Hwan Bu, Sung Kgun Lee, Seo Young Ko, Soo Hoon Lee, Chang Bae Park, Jin Gu Lee, Jong Yeon Kang, Jaeyoon Ha, Jiwon Kim","doi":"10.15441/ceem.24.331","DOIUrl":"10.15441/ceem.24.331","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) often occurs alongside injuries to other body regions, worsening patient outcomes. This study evaluates the impact of concomitant injuries on clinical outcomes in patients with isolated versus non-isolated TBI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional analysis was conducted using data from the Emergency Department-based Injury In-depth Surveillance (EDIIS) for 180,058 TBI patients admitted to 23 tertiary hospitals from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022. Patients were categorized into isolated TBI group (iTBI; n=127,673) and non-isolated TBI group (niTBI; n=52,385) based on injury diagnostic codes. Clinical outcomes-24-hour and 30-day mortality, hospital admission, and interhospital transfer-were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analyses adjusted for potential confounders were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The niTBI patients exhibited significantly higher 24-hour mortality (1.5% vs. 0.4%), 30-day mortality (2.6% vs. 1.0%), hospital admissions (24.5% vs. 8.4%), and interhospital transfers (3.6% vs. 1.1%) than iTBI patients (all P<0.001). Concomitant injuries increased the adjusted odds of 24-hour mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.456; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.286-1.648) and 30-day mortality (aOR, 1.111; 95% CI, 1.022-1.208). Thoracic injuries were the most significant predictor of adverse outcomes in niTBI patients, increasing the odds of 24-hour mortality by nearly sixfold (aOR, 5.958; 95% CI 5.057-7.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>s: Concomitant injuries significantly worsen clinical outcomes in TBI patients, with thoracic injuries being the most critical predictor of mortality. These findings highlight the importance of comprehensive trauma assessments and targeted prevention strategies to improve survival rates and optimize resource allocation for patients with multiple injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"358-368"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12824543/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143001100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-12-23DOI: 10.15441/ceem.24.383
İlknur Şahin, Hasan Kara, Ali Ünlü, Ceyhan Uğurluoğlu, Beyza Saraçlıgil
Objective: The study investigates experimental brain trauma in rabbits, assessing levels of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and interleukin 6 (IL-6) in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and compares these biomarkers among trauma groups.
Methods: Thirty rabbits were randomized to a control group (n=6) or to mild-, moderate-, and severe-trauma groups (n=8 each) created by dropping 200, 350, or 500 g weights, respectively, onto their skulls using a modified Marmarou impact acceleration model. CSF and venous blood samples were collected at 0, 12, and 24 hours after injury; UCH-1 L, GFAP, and IL-6 concentrations in CSF and serum were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, and group differences were analyzed with a Friedman test followed by Dunn-Bonferroni correction.
Results: Neither CSF nor serum concentration of GFAP, IL-6, or UCH-L1 differed from those of controls after mild trauma. Severe head trauma produced markedly higher GFAP and IL-6 concentrations in CSF compared with the control group (P<0.05), with both biomarkers peaking at 12 hours after injury. Serum UCH-L1 increased significantly in both moderate-trauma (peak at 12 hours) and severe-trauma groups (peak at 24 hours) compared with the control group (P<0.05), whereas no intergroup difference in CSF UCH-L1 levels was evident.
Conclusion: Serum UCH-L1 differentiated moderate and severe trauma from controls in a rabbit model, whereas CSF GFAP and IL-6 levels reflected severe injury. Validation in larger preclinical and clinical studies is warranted.
{"title":"Study of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and interleukin-6 levels in an experimental head trauma model in rabbits.","authors":"İlknur Şahin, Hasan Kara, Ali Ünlü, Ceyhan Uğurluoğlu, Beyza Saraçlıgil","doi":"10.15441/ceem.24.383","DOIUrl":"10.15441/ceem.24.383","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study investigates experimental brain trauma in rabbits, assessing levels of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and interleukin 6 (IL-6) in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and compares these biomarkers among trauma groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty rabbits were randomized to a control group (n=6) or to mild-, moderate-, and severe-trauma groups (n=8 each) created by dropping 200, 350, or 500 g weights, respectively, onto their skulls using a modified Marmarou impact acceleration model. CSF and venous blood samples were collected at 0, 12, and 24 hours after injury; UCH-1 L, GFAP, and IL-6 concentrations in CSF and serum were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, and group differences were analyzed with a Friedman test followed by Dunn-Bonferroni correction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neither CSF nor serum concentration of GFAP, IL-6, or UCH-L1 differed from those of controls after mild trauma. Severe head trauma produced markedly higher GFAP and IL-6 concentrations in CSF compared with the control group (P<0.05), with both biomarkers peaking at 12 hours after injury. Serum UCH-L1 increased significantly in both moderate-trauma (peak at 12 hours) and severe-trauma groups (peak at 24 hours) compared with the control group (P<0.05), whereas no intergroup difference in CSF UCH-L1 levels was evident.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Serum UCH-L1 differentiated moderate and severe trauma from controls in a rabbit model, whereas CSF GFAP and IL-6 levels reflected severe injury. Validation in larger preclinical and clinical studies is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":"12 4","pages":"380-390"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12824541/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145965493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2024-10-16DOI: 10.15441/ceem.24.251
Leopold Simma
Objective: To explore and analyze pediatric trauma care practices across designated pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) in Switzerland. The focus was on reception, trauma team activation (TTA), trauma team composition, patient volumes, and infrastructure.
Methods: A national online survey was conducted among all eight PTCs in Switzerland using an 18-item questionnaire. The survey investigated organizational aspects, criteria for TTA, patient volume, and communication modalities in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs).
Results: All PTCs responded, revealing varying methods of TTA, with reception of major trauma patients occurring at either PEDs or adjacent adult trauma facilities. Trauma team composition and activation criteria also differ among centers, with nonsurgeons often leading the teams and anesthesiologists being the default facilitators of airway management. TTA criteria vary widely, with the most common being the request of prehospitalization staff (62.5%) and physician discretion (50%). Trauma resuscitation is predominantly led by PED attendants (75%).
Conclusion: This survey provides insights into the state of pediatric trauma care in Switzerland. The findings underscore the importance of multidisciplinary teams and variability in trauma management practices, which are often tailored to local circumstances. Despite the study limitations of using self-reported data and the small sample size owing to the country's size, the result suggest that a national trauma registry would be helpful to the evaluation and optimization of pediatric trauma care protocols.
{"title":"Pediatric trauma management in Switzerland: insights from a nationwide survey.","authors":"Leopold Simma","doi":"10.15441/ceem.24.251","DOIUrl":"10.15441/ceem.24.251","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore and analyze pediatric trauma care practices across designated pediatric trauma centers (PTCs) in Switzerland. The focus was on reception, trauma team activation (TTA), trauma team composition, patient volumes, and infrastructure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A national online survey was conducted among all eight PTCs in Switzerland using an 18-item questionnaire. The survey investigated organizational aspects, criteria for TTA, patient volume, and communication modalities in pediatric emergency departments (PEDs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All PTCs responded, revealing varying methods of TTA, with reception of major trauma patients occurring at either PEDs or adjacent adult trauma facilities. Trauma team composition and activation criteria also differ among centers, with nonsurgeons often leading the teams and anesthesiologists being the default facilitators of airway management. TTA criteria vary widely, with the most common being the request of prehospitalization staff (62.5%) and physician discretion (50%). Trauma resuscitation is predominantly led by PED attendants (75%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This survey provides insights into the state of pediatric trauma care in Switzerland. The findings underscore the importance of multidisciplinary teams and variability in trauma management practices, which are often tailored to local circumstances. Despite the study limitations of using self-reported data and the small sample size owing to the country's size, the result suggest that a national trauma registry would be helpful to the evaluation and optimization of pediatric trauma care protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"280-286"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12541523/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142459487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Ketamine is a promising drug for analgesia in emergency medicine, but the high rate of side effects is a barrier to widespread usage. We hypothesized that ketamine bolus followed by ketamine infusion would provide a more even and longer duration of analgesia and lower rates of side effects in comparison to bolus-only administration.
Methods: This was a double-blinded clinical trial. Eligible trauma patients were randomly allocated with the numeric rating scale ≥6 in two study groups. The first group received a dose of 0.3 mg/kg of ketamine over 1 minute, followed by an infusion of saline 0.9% over the next 30 minutes (bolus-only group). The second group was given 0.15 mg/kg of ketamine over 1 minute, followed by an infusion of 0.15 mg/kg over the next 30 minutes (bolus-and-infusion group). The primary outcome was to measure the average reduction in pain scores.
Results: In total, 80 patients were recruited. Of these, 77 patients were analyzed. Both groups achieved a statistically significant decrease in pain scores (all P<0.001). After 30 minutes, patients in the bolus-and-infusion group reported lower pain scores in all intervals with lower rates of need for rescue analgesia, but this difference was not statistically significant. Vital signs remained stable during the study in both groups. No statistically significant difference was observed between study groups for any side effect (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Both administration protocols resulted in significant pain control. No statistically significant difference was observed between study groups in terms of analgesic efficacy and side effects.
{"title":"Comparison of the efficacy of bolus low-dose ketamine versus bolus plus infusion low-dose ketamine on pain management in emergency departments: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Reza Azizikhani, Ali Sanaei, Farhad Heydari, Saeed Majidinejad, Keihan Golshani, Fateme Sadeghi, Pardis Rafiei","doi":"10.15441/ceem.24.244","DOIUrl":"10.15441/ceem.24.244","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Ketamine is a promising drug for analgesia in emergency medicine, but the high rate of side effects is a barrier to widespread usage. We hypothesized that ketamine bolus followed by ketamine infusion would provide a more even and longer duration of analgesia and lower rates of side effects in comparison to bolus-only administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a double-blinded clinical trial. Eligible trauma patients were randomly allocated with the numeric rating scale ≥6 in two study groups. The first group received a dose of 0.3 mg/kg of ketamine over 1 minute, followed by an infusion of saline 0.9% over the next 30 minutes (bolus-only group). The second group was given 0.15 mg/kg of ketamine over 1 minute, followed by an infusion of 0.15 mg/kg over the next 30 minutes (bolus-and-infusion group). The primary outcome was to measure the average reduction in pain scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 80 patients were recruited. Of these, 77 patients were analyzed. Both groups achieved a statistically significant decrease in pain scores (all P<0.001). After 30 minutes, patients in the bolus-and-infusion group reported lower pain scores in all intervals with lower rates of need for rescue analgesia, but this difference was not statistically significant. Vital signs remained stable during the study in both groups. No statistically significant difference was observed between study groups for any side effect (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both administration protocols resulted in significant pain control. No statistically significant difference was observed between study groups in terms of analgesic efficacy and side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"259-266"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12541530/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142977885","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-01-14DOI: 10.15441/ceem.24.290
Georgios Mavrovounis, Maria Mermiri, Ioannis Drivas, Konstantinos Drivas, Theodosis Kalamatianos, Sotirios G Zarogiannis, Ioannis Pantazopoulos
This bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited articles on experimental cardiac arrest models in rats identifies key contributors, publication trends, research themes, and collaboration networks. A comprehensive literature search of the Web of Science database was performed on June 11, 2024, using keywords related to cardiac arrest and rat models. The top 100 most cited articles were analyzed using the biblioshiny web application from the bibliometrix R ver. 4.2.3 and categorized by primary research focus. The articles were published from 1980 to 2022 and involved 416 authors and 44 journals, averaging 106.7 citations each. The primary research themes were neurology (72%), organ transplantation (7%), cardiovascular system (6%), Cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes after local anesthetic toxicity (4%), and other topics (5%). The United States, Japan, and Germany were leading contributors. Major clusters identified include "cerebral ischemia and outcomes," "brain imaging metrics," and "blood brain barrier." The most commonly used methodologies for cardiac arrest induction were asphyxia, induction by magnesium or potassium chloride, and electrical stimulation. This first bibliometric analysis on this topic reveals the dominance of neuroscience in experimental cardiac arrest models in rats. High-impact journals such as the Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism play critical roles in disseminating significant research. The study highlights substantial gaps in global research engagement, with minimal contributions from lower income countries and few international collaborations. This analysis provides a roadmap for future research and opportunities for more extensive international and interdisciplinary collaboration, always with a focus on scientific rigor.
本研究旨在对100篇被引用最多的大鼠实验性心脏骤停模型文章进行文献计量学分析,确定主要贡献者、出版趋势、研究主题和合作网络。我们于2024年6月11日在Web of Science (WoS)数据库中检索了与心脏骤停和大鼠模型相关的关键词,进行了全面的文献检索。使用Bibliometrix R软件包(4.2.3版)中的Biblioshiny web应用程序分析了被引用次数最多的前100篇文章,并根据主要研究重点进行了分类。这些文章发表于1980年至2022年,涉及44种期刊的416位作者,平均每人被引用106.7次。主要研究主题为神经病学(72%)、器官移植(7%)、心血管系统(6%)、局麻毒性后CPR结果(4%)和其他主题(5%)。美国、日本和德国是主要捐助国,国际合作有限。确定的主要集群包括“脑缺血和结果”、“脑成像指标”和“血脑屏障”。诱导心脏骤停最常用的方法是窒息、氯化镁或氯化钾诱导和电刺激。这一主题的首次文献计量学分析揭示了神经科学在大鼠心脏骤停实验模型中的主导地位。像《脑血流与代谢杂志》这样的高影响力期刊在传播重要研究方面发挥着关键作用。该研究强调了全球研究参与方面的巨大差距,低收入国家的贡献微乎其微,国际合作也很少。这一分析为未来的研究方向提供了路线图,并为更广泛的国际和跨学科合作提供了机会,始终关注科学的严谨性。
{"title":"The landscape of experimental cardiac arrest research models in rats: a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited articles.","authors":"Georgios Mavrovounis, Maria Mermiri, Ioannis Drivas, Konstantinos Drivas, Theodosis Kalamatianos, Sotirios G Zarogiannis, Ioannis Pantazopoulos","doi":"10.15441/ceem.24.290","DOIUrl":"10.15441/ceem.24.290","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This bibliometric analysis of the 100 most cited articles on experimental cardiac arrest models in rats identifies key contributors, publication trends, research themes, and collaboration networks. A comprehensive literature search of the Web of Science database was performed on June 11, 2024, using keywords related to cardiac arrest and rat models. The top 100 most cited articles were analyzed using the biblioshiny web application from the bibliometrix R ver. 4.2.3 and categorized by primary research focus. The articles were published from 1980 to 2022 and involved 416 authors and 44 journals, averaging 106.7 citations each. The primary research themes were neurology (72%), organ transplantation (7%), cardiovascular system (6%), Cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes after local anesthetic toxicity (4%), and other topics (5%). The United States, Japan, and Germany were leading contributors. Major clusters identified include \"cerebral ischemia and outcomes,\" \"brain imaging metrics,\" and \"blood brain barrier.\" The most commonly used methodologies for cardiac arrest induction were asphyxia, induction by magnesium or potassium chloride, and electrical stimulation. This first bibliometric analysis on this topic reveals the dominance of neuroscience in experimental cardiac arrest models in rats. High-impact journals such as the Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism play critical roles in disseminating significant research. The study highlights substantial gaps in global research engagement, with minimal contributions from lower income countries and few international collaborations. This analysis provides a roadmap for future research and opportunities for more extensive international and interdisciplinary collaboration, always with a focus on scientific rigor.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"198-211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12541529/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142977857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-09-30DOI: 10.15441/ceem.25.107
Robert Nocito, Scott D Weingart
{"title":"The logistics of optimal preoxygenation and peri-intubation oxygenation in critically ill patients.","authors":"Robert Nocito, Scott D Weingart","doi":"10.15441/ceem.25.107","DOIUrl":"10.15441/ceem.25.107","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":"12 3","pages":"291-293"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12541511/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145343971","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-03-04DOI: 10.15441/ceem.24.368
Carissa Du, Daniel Zhao, Latha Ganti
{"title":"Acute right-sided thalamic stroke successfully treated with thrombolytics.","authors":"Carissa Du, Daniel Zhao, Latha Ganti","doi":"10.15441/ceem.24.368","DOIUrl":"10.15441/ceem.24.368","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":"12 3","pages":"296-299"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12541525/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145343968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2024-09-06DOI: 10.15441/ceem.24.249
Christopher D Yang, Christine K Kim, Melissa M Chang, Pooya Khosravi, Ajeet Pal Bayo Bhatia, Amanda Dos Santos, Kyle Dornhofer, Megan Guy, Edmund Hsu, Soheil Saadat, John Christian Fox
Objective: To evaluate the current body of literature pertaining to the use of ocular point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the emergency department (ED).
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases. Inclusion criteria were studies written in English and primary clinical studies involving ocular POCUS scans in an ED setting. Exclusion criteria were nonprimary studies (e.g., reviews or case reports), studies written in a non-English language, nonhuman studies, studies performed in a nonemergency setting, studies involving non-POCUS ocular ultrasound modalities, or studies published more than 10 years prior. Data extraction was guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) recommendations.
Results: The initial search yielded 391 results with 153 duplicates. Of the remaining 238 studies selected for retrieval and screening, 24 met the inclusion criteria. These 24 included studies encompassed 2,448 patients across prospective, retrospective, cross-sectional, and case series study designs. The majority of included studies focused on the use of POCUS in the ED to measure optic nerve sheath diameter as a proxy for papilledema and metabolic aberrations, while a minority of studies used ocular POCUS to assist in the diagnosis of orbital fractures or posterior segment pathology.
Conclusion: The vast majority of studies investigating the use of ocular POCUS in recent years emphasize its utility in measuring optic nerve sheath diameter and fluctuations in intracranial pressure, though additional outcomes of interest include pathology of the posterior segment, orbit, and globe.
{"title":"Applications of ocular point-of-care ultrasound assessment in the emergency setting: a scoping review.","authors":"Christopher D Yang, Christine K Kim, Melissa M Chang, Pooya Khosravi, Ajeet Pal Bayo Bhatia, Amanda Dos Santos, Kyle Dornhofer, Megan Guy, Edmund Hsu, Soheil Saadat, John Christian Fox","doi":"10.15441/ceem.24.249","DOIUrl":"10.15441/ceem.24.249","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the current body of literature pertaining to the use of ocular point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in the emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted on Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases. Inclusion criteria were studies written in English and primary clinical studies involving ocular POCUS scans in an ED setting. Exclusion criteria were nonprimary studies (e.g., reviews or case reports), studies written in a non-English language, nonhuman studies, studies performed in a nonemergency setting, studies involving non-POCUS ocular ultrasound modalities, or studies published more than 10 years prior. Data extraction was guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The initial search yielded 391 results with 153 duplicates. Of the remaining 238 studies selected for retrieval and screening, 24 met the inclusion criteria. These 24 included studies encompassed 2,448 patients across prospective, retrospective, cross-sectional, and case series study designs. The majority of included studies focused on the use of POCUS in the ED to measure optic nerve sheath diameter as a proxy for papilledema and metabolic aberrations, while a minority of studies used ocular POCUS to assist in the diagnosis of orbital fractures or posterior segment pathology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The vast majority of studies investigating the use of ocular POCUS in recent years emphasize its utility in measuring optic nerve sheath diameter and fluctuations in intracranial pressure, though additional outcomes of interest include pathology of the posterior segment, orbit, and globe.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"188-197"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12541526/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142139441","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-09-01Epub Date: 2025-04-30DOI: 10.15441/ceem.25.012
Mohammed Arif Abdul Salam, Varsha Shinde, Suhrith Bhattaram, Maya Jamkar
{"title":"Cyanosis to diagnosis: various causes of methemoglobinemia.","authors":"Mohammed Arif Abdul Salam, Varsha Shinde, Suhrith Bhattaram, Maya Jamkar","doi":"10.15441/ceem.25.012","DOIUrl":"10.15441/ceem.25.012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":"12 3","pages":"300-302"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12541516/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145343969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}