Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology最新文献

Background and aims: The prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) among Hispanic/Latine communities is increasing. Pharmacogenomic studies reveal genetic markers that influence treatment decisions. The aim of our study was to examine the frequency and impact of genetic polymorphisms on thiopurine-associated leukopenia (NUDT15, TPMT) and anti-TNF immunogenicity (HLA-DQA1*05) in a cohort of Hispanic patients of diverse ancestral backgrounds.

Methods: We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study comprised of 2225 Hispanic participants. We measured the frequency of variation affecting drug response in NUDT15, TPMT, and HLA-DQA1*05, their ancestral origin (European, African, or Amerindian), and the rate of development of myelosuppression and immunogenicity to thiopurines and anti-TNFs, respectively, in exposed patients.

Results: NUDT15 and TPMT variants were rare, except for rs116855232 in NUDT15 which was common only in alleles of Amerindian origin. All NUDT15 variant alleles were inherited on an Amerindian haplotype, and among the Amerindian allele subset, the variant frequency of NUDT15*4 (rs147390019) was a remarkable 23% in patients with leukopenia but only 3% in patients without leukopenia. HLA-DQA1*05 and its European tagging variant rs2097432 were common in alleles from all ancestral origins and demonstrated association with immunogenicity to anti-TNFs. However, rs2097432 was only correlated with HLA-DQA1*05 in the European allele subset.

Conclusion: These findings indicate that NUDT15 testing should become standard clinical practice before prescribing thiopurines in individuals with Amerindian ancestry, including Hispanic individuals. Additionally, rs2097432 should not be used as a surrogate for HLA-DQA1*05 testing for diverse populations. Ultimately, incorporating ancestry in personalized therapeutic approaches is important for treatment of Hispanic patients with IBD.

The rising global prevalence of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), such as Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), underscores the need to examine current and future IBD care costs. Direct healthcare expenses, including ambulatory visits, hospitalizations, and medications, are substantial, averaging $9,000 to $12,000 per person annually in high-income regions. However, these estimates do not fully account for factors such as disease severity, accessibility, and variability in healthcare infrastructure among regions. Indirect costs, predominantly stemming from loss in productivity due to absenteeism, presenteeism, and other intangible costs, further contribute to the financial burden of IBD. Despite efforts to quantify indirect costs, many aspects remain poorly understood, leading to an underestimation of their actual impact. Challenges to achieving cost sustainability include disparities in access, treatment affordability, and the absence of standardized cost-effective care guidelines. Strategies for making IBD care sustainable include early implementation of biologic therapies, focusing on cost-effectiveness in settings with limited resources, and promoting the uptake of biosimilars to reduce direct costs. Multidisciplinary care teams leveraging technology and patient-reported outcomes also hold promise in reducing both direct and indirect costs associated with IBD. Addressing the increasing financial burden of IBD requires a comprehensive approach that tackles disparities, enhances access to cost-effective therapeutics, and promotes collaborative efforts across healthcare systems. Embracing innovative strategies can pave the way for personalized, cost-effective care accessible to all individuals with IBD, ensuring better outcomes and sustainability.

The therapeutic armamentarium for management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) has expanded dramatically in the last 5 years, with the introduction of several medications with different mechanisms of action. These include the oral small molecule drugs Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi, including upadacitinib approved for Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC], as well as tofacitinib, approved for UC) and sphingosphine 1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators (ozanimod and etrasimod, both approved for UC), as well as biologic agents like selective interleukin-23 (IL23) antagonists (risankizumab approved for CD, and mirikizumab approved for UC). The efficacy and safety of these therapies vary. In this review, we discuss practical use of these newer advanced therapies focusing on real-world effectiveness and safety data, dosing and monitoring considerations, as well as special situations for their use such as pregnancy, co-morbid immune-mediated disease, use in hospitalized patients with acute severe UC, and in the perioperative setting. We also propose our approach to positioning these therapies in clinical practice, relying on careful integration of the medication's comparative effectiveness and safety in the context of an individual patient's risk of disease- and treatment-related complications and preferences.

Background & aims: Archaea constitute one of the main 3 domains of the tree of life, distinct from eukaryotes and bacteria. Excessive luminal loads of methanogenic archaea (intestinal methanogen overgrowth [IMO]) have been implicated in the pathophysiology of various diseases, including constipation. To elucidate the phenotypical presentation of IMO, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and severity of gastrointestinal symptoms in subjects with IMO as compared with subjects without IMO.

Methods: Electronic databases, including OVID MEDLINE and Cochrane Database from inception until September 2023, were systematically searched. Prevalence rates, odds ratios (ORs), standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of symptoms were calculated.

Results: Nineteen studies were included (1293 patients with IMO and 3208 controls). Patients with IMO exhibited various gastrointestinal symptoms, including bloating (78%), constipation (51%), diarrhea (33%), abdominal pain (65%), nausea (30%), and flatulence (56%). Patients with IMO had a significantly higher prevalence of constipation as compared with controls (47% vs 38%; OR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.48-2.83; P < .0001) along with lower prevalence of diarrhea (37% vs 52%; OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37-0.90; P = .01) and nausea (32% vs 45%; OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.94; P = .01). Patients with IMO had higher severity of constipation (SMD, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.11-1.43; P = .02) and lower severity of diarrhea (SMD, -0.71; 95% CI, -1.39 to -0.03; P = .04). Significant heterogeneity was detected.

Conclusion: Patients with IMO exhibit a higher rate and severity of constipation along with lower rate and severity of diarrhea. The distinct phenotype of patients with IMO should be incorporated in patient-reported outcome measures and further correlated with mechanistic microbiome studies.