首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Rehabilitation最新文献

英文 中文
Reliability, validity and usability of the K-force® grip dynamometer to evaluate handgrip-strength in patients with intensive care unit-acquired weakness. 用 K-force® 握力器评估重症监护室乏力患者手握强度的可靠性、有效性和可用性。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI: 10.1177/02692155241295979
Ingrid D van Iperen, Daphne Stegink, Barbara L Tempert-de Haan, Marleen Flim, Robert van der Stoep, Peter E Spronk

Objective: Handgrip dynamometry is recognised as a method for evaluating volitional muscle strength in the intensive care, but conventional handgrip dynamometers cannot accurately measure grip strength in very weak patients. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability, validity and usability of the K-force® grip in patients with intensive care unit-acquired weakness.

Design: Evaluation of measurement properties of the K-force® grip.

Setting: Two Intensive Care Units in The Netherlands.

Participants: Patients diagnosed with intensive care unit-acquired weakness according to a Medical Research Council sum score <48.

Intervention & main measures: Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the K-force® grip were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Concurrent validity was examined using calibration weights. The usability was evaluated with the System Usability Scale.

Results: Intra-rater reliability showed an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.987 for the dominant hand and 0.972 for the non-dominant hand. Inter-rater reliability showed coefficients of 0.944 for the dominant hand and 0.942 for the non-dominant hand. There was a perfect correlation (r = 1) between the K-force® grip and the calibration weights. The usability of the K-force® grip was rated excellent by 11 healthcare professionals with a System Usability Scale score of 86.

Conclusions: The K-force® grip is a promising new tool for the evaluation of muscle strength in intensive care unit-acquired weakness patients who are too weak to use conventional hand dynamometers.

目的:手握力测定法被认为是重症监护中评估意志肌力的一种方法,但传统的手握力测定法无法准确测量非常虚弱的患者的握力。本研究旨在确定 K-force® 握力器在重症监护室乏力患者中的可靠性、有效性和可用性:设计:评估 K-force® 握力器的测量特性:环境: 荷兰两家重症监护病房:根据医学研究委员会的总分诊断为重症监护室获得性乏力的患者:使用类内相关系数评估K-force®握力器的内部和评分者之间的可靠性。同时有效性采用校准权重进行检验。使用系统可用性量表对可用性进行评估:评分者内部信度显示,惯用手的类内相关系数为 0.987,非惯用手的类内相关系数为 0.972。评分者之间的可靠性显示,优势手的相关系数为 0.944,非优势手的相关系数为 0.942。K-force® 握力器与校准砝码之间存在完美的相关性(r = 1)。11名专业医护人员对K-force®握把的可用性进行了评分,系统可用性量表得分为86.结论为 "优秀":结论:K-force®握力器是一种很有前途的新工具,可用于评估重症监护室因虚弱而无法使用传统手部测力计的患者的肌力。
{"title":"Reliability, validity and usability of the K-force<sup>®</sup> grip dynamometer to evaluate handgrip-strength in patients with intensive care unit-acquired weakness.","authors":"Ingrid D van Iperen, Daphne Stegink, Barbara L Tempert-de Haan, Marleen Flim, Robert van der Stoep, Peter E Spronk","doi":"10.1177/02692155241295979","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241295979","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Handgrip dynamometry is recognised as a method for evaluating volitional muscle strength in the intensive care, but conventional handgrip dynamometers cannot accurately measure grip strength in very weak patients. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability, validity and usability of the K-force<sup>®</sup> grip in patients with intensive care unit-acquired weakness.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Evaluation of measurement properties of the K-force<sup>®</sup> grip.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two Intensive Care Units in The Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients diagnosed with intensive care unit-acquired weakness according to a Medical Research Council sum score <48.</p><p><strong>Intervention & main measures: </strong>Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the K-force<sup>®</sup> grip were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Concurrent validity was examined using calibration weights. The usability was evaluated with the System Usability Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intra-rater reliability showed an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.987 for the dominant hand and 0.972 for the non-dominant hand. Inter-rater reliability showed coefficients of 0.944 for the dominant hand and 0.942 for the non-dominant hand. There was a perfect correlation (<i>r</i> = 1) between the K-force® grip and the calibration weights. The usability of the K-force® grip was rated excellent by 11 healthcare professionals with a System Usability Scale score of 86.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The K-force<sup>®</sup> grip is a promising new tool for the evaluation of muscle strength in intensive care unit-acquired weakness patients who are too weak to use conventional hand dynamometers.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155241295979"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142615883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Oswestry Disability Index is not a good measure for low back pain in adolescents: A Rasch analysis of data from 200 people. 奥斯韦特里残疾指数(Oswestry Disability Index)并不能很好地衡量青少年的腰背痛:对 200 人数据的 Rasch 分析。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI: 10.1177/02692155241296802
Mitchell Selhorst, Todd Degenhart, Michael Jackowski, Samuel Meyer, Alexander Rospert

Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the modified Oswestry Disability Index in adolescents with low back pain through Rasch analysis.

Design: This is a psychometric study.

Setting: Physical therapy clinics of a large pediatric hospital in Columbus, Ohio (United States).

Subjects: Two hundred adolescent patients with low back pain (112 female, 15.4 ± 1.9 years old).

Main measure: The modified Oswestry Disability Index.

Results: The mean modified Oswestry Disability Index score was 17.1 ± 12.1, with scores ranging from 0 to 56 on the 100-point scale. The Rasch person reliability for the Oswestry Disability Index was 0.70, representing minimal acceptable person reliability. The Oswestry Disability Index demonstrated poor item spacing, hierarchy, and targeting of the adolescents' disability level (>1 logit between person mean and item mean). A significant misfit was observed in three of 10 items. There were significant issues with the functioning of responses on all items of the Oswestry Disability Index. Principal component analysis of residuals revealed a ratio of 5.3:1, demonstrating acceptable unidimensionality.

Conclusion: Due to multiple psychometric issues, the Oswestry Disability should not be used to assess disability in adolescents with low back pain. The Oswestry Disability Index significantly mistargets adolescent ability and only provides an acceptable assessment of the most disabled adolescents.

目的通过 Rasch 分析法评估腰背痛青少年改良 Oswestry 残疾指数的心理计量特性:设计:这是一项心理测量研究:美国俄亥俄州哥伦布市一家大型儿科医院的理疗诊所:主要测量指标:改良 Oswestry 残疾指数:结果:改良 Oswestry 残疾指数的平均值为(17.1 ± 12.1)分,100 分制的评分范围为 0 至 56 分。Oswestry 失能指数的 Rasch 人信度为 0.70,代表最低可接受的人信度。奥斯韦特里残疾指数的项目间距、层次性和青少年残疾程度的针对性都很差(个人平均值与项目平均值之间的对数大于 1)。在 10 个项目中,有 3 个出现了明显的不匹配。在 Oswestry 残疾指数的所有项目中,回答的功能都存在重大问题。残差的主成分分析显示比率为 5.3:1,显示了可接受的单维性:结论:由于存在多种心理测量问题,Oswestry残疾指数不应用于评估青少年腰背痛患者的残疾情况。Oswestry残疾指数严重误导了青少年的能力,只能对残疾程度最严重的青少年进行可接受的评估。
{"title":"The Oswestry Disability Index is not a good measure for low back pain in adolescents: A Rasch analysis of data from 200 people.","authors":"Mitchell Selhorst, Todd Degenhart, Michael Jackowski, Samuel Meyer, Alexander Rospert","doi":"10.1177/02692155241296802","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241296802","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the psychometric properties of the modified Oswestry Disability Index in adolescents with low back pain through Rasch analysis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a psychometric study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Physical therapy clinics of a large pediatric hospital in Columbus, Ohio (United States).</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Two hundred adolescent patients with low back pain (112 female, 15.4 ± 1.9 years old).</p><p><strong>Main measure: </strong>The modified Oswestry Disability Index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean modified Oswestry Disability Index score was 17.1 ± 12.1, with scores ranging from 0 to 56 on the 100-point scale. The Rasch person reliability for the Oswestry Disability Index was 0.70, representing minimal acceptable person reliability. The Oswestry Disability Index demonstrated poor item spacing, hierarchy, and targeting of the adolescents' disability level (>1 logit between person mean and item mean). A significant misfit was observed in three of 10 items. There were significant issues with the functioning of responses on all items of the Oswestry Disability Index. Principal component analysis of residuals revealed a ratio of 5.3:1, demonstrating acceptable unidimensionality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Due to multiple psychometric issues, the Oswestry Disability should not be used to assess disability in adolescents with low back pain. The Oswestry Disability Index significantly mistargets adolescent ability and only provides an acceptable assessment of the most disabled adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155241296802"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142603596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Several components of postural control are affected by benign paroxysmal positional vertigo but improve after particle-repositioning maneuvers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 良性阵发性位置性眩晕会影响姿势控制的几个组成部分,但在进行粒子定位操作后会有所改善:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI: 10.1177/02692155241292662
Sara Pauwels, Laura Casters, Pieter Meyns, Nele Lemkens, Winde Lemmens, Kenneth Meijer, Raymond van de Berg, Joke Spildooren

Objective: Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo is a vestibular disorder causing vertigo and imbalance. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore the impact of benign paroxysmal positioning vertigo and repositioning maneuvers on postural control.

Data sources: In September 2024, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and reference lists of included studies were systematically searched. Articles comparing measures of postural control between patients and controls, and/or pre- and posttreatment were considered relevant.

Methods: Study selection, data extraction and identification of risk of bias were done by two researchers. If possible, meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager version 5.4.1 and standardized mean differences were calculated with a random-effects model.

Results: Twenty-one of the 37 included studies were useful for meta-analyses. Meta-analyses revealed that benign paroxysmal positional vertigo negatively affects perception of verticality (p < .001; SMD = 0.73; 95% CI = [0.39;1.08]) and sensory orientation (p < .001; SMD = -1.66; 95% CI = [-2.08, -1.23]). The perception of verticality (p < .001; SMD = 0.99; 95% CI = [0.76;1.21]) and sensory orientation (p < .001; SMD = -0.77; 95% CI = [-1.11, -0.44]) improved after treatment with repositioning maneuvers. Results of systematic review indicate stability in gait was impaired, vertigo but improve after repositioning maneuvers. Limits of stability were impaired in older patients, but did not improved after repositioning maneuvers.

Conclusion: Benign paroxysmal positioning vertigo affects several underlying components of postural control. Repositioning maneuvers can significantly improve the related postural control impairments. This may partly explain the increased odds of falling in these patients, and the positive treatment effect of repositioning maneuvers on falls and fear of falling.

目的:良性阵发性位置性眩晕是一种导致眩晕和失衡的前庭疾病。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在探讨良性阵发性位置性眩晕和复位手法对姿势控制的影响:2024 年 9 月,系统检索了 PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus 和纳入研究的参考文献列表。比较患者与对照组之间和/或治疗前与治疗后姿势控制测量的文章被认为是相关的:研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险识别由两名研究人员完成。在可能的情况下,使用Review Manager 5.4.1版本进行荟萃分析,并使用随机效应模型计算标准化均值差异:在纳入的 37 项研究中,有 21 项有助于进行荟萃分析。荟萃分析表明,良性阵发性位置性眩晕会对垂直感产生负面影响(p 结论:良性阵发性位置性眩晕会对垂直感产生负面影响:良性阵发性位置性眩晕会影响姿势控制的多个基本组成部分。重新定位操作可明显改善相关的姿势控制障碍。这可能是这些患者跌倒几率增加的部分原因,也是调整体位疗法对跌倒和跌倒恐惧有积极治疗效果的部分原因。
{"title":"Several components of postural control are affected by benign paroxysmal positional vertigo but improve after particle-repositioning maneuvers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Sara Pauwels, Laura Casters, Pieter Meyns, Nele Lemkens, Winde Lemmens, Kenneth Meijer, Raymond van de Berg, Joke Spildooren","doi":"10.1177/02692155241292662","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241292662","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo is a vestibular disorder causing vertigo and imbalance. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore the impact of benign paroxysmal positioning vertigo and repositioning maneuvers on postural control.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>In September 2024, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and reference lists of included studies were systematically searched. Articles comparing measures of postural control between patients and controls, and/or pre- and posttreatment were considered relevant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study selection, data extraction and identification of risk of bias were done by two researchers. If possible, meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager version 5.4.1 and standardized mean differences were calculated with a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one of the 37 included studies were useful for meta-analyses. Meta-analyses revealed that benign paroxysmal positional vertigo negatively affects perception of verticality (p < .001; SMD = 0.73; 95% CI = [0.39;1.08]) and sensory orientation (p < .001; SMD = -1.66; 95% CI = [-2.08, -1.23]). The perception of verticality (p < .001; SMD = 0.99; 95% CI = [0.76;1.21]) and sensory orientation (p < .001; SMD = -0.77; 95% CI = [-1.11, -0.44]) improved after treatment with repositioning maneuvers. Results of systematic review indicate stability in gait was impaired, vertigo but improve after repositioning maneuvers. Limits of stability were impaired in older patients, but did not improved after repositioning maneuvers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Benign paroxysmal positioning vertigo affects several underlying components of postural control. Repositioning maneuvers can significantly improve the related postural control impairments. This may partly explain the increased odds of falling in these patients, and the positive treatment effect of repositioning maneuvers on falls and fear of falling.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155241292662"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142582413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response to letter to the editor "Standardizing blood flow restriction research-the crucial role of identifying apparatus methodology and analysis". 回应致编辑的信 "血流限制研究的标准化--确定仪器方法和分析的关键作用"。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-11-03 DOI: 10.1177/02692155241296131
Stuart A Warmington, Matthew J Clarkson
{"title":"Response to letter to the editor \"Standardizing blood flow restriction research-the crucial role of identifying apparatus methodology and analysis\".","authors":"Stuart A Warmington, Matthew J Clarkson","doi":"10.1177/02692155241296131","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241296131","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155241296131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142567340","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Standardizing blood flow restriction research-the crucial role of identifying apparatus in methodology and analysis: A letter to the editor. 血流受限研究的标准化--识别仪器在方法和分析中的关键作用:致编辑的一封信。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-11-03 DOI: 10.1177/02692155241293247
Nicholas Rolnick, Jim McEwen, Victor De Queiros, Tim Werner
{"title":"Standardizing blood flow restriction research-the crucial role of identifying apparatus in methodology and analysis: A letter to the editor.","authors":"Nicholas Rolnick, Jim McEwen, Victor De Queiros, Tim Werner","doi":"10.1177/02692155241293247","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155241293247","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155241293247"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142567523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Predictors of return to work among postoperative patients with colorectal cancer. 结直肠癌术后患者重返工作岗位的预测因素。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI: 10.1177/02692155241264773
Ning Zhang, Fan Yang, Wenlong Di, Shujie Wang, Zijing Wu

Objective: To describe the status of return to work and identify predictors of return to work among Chinese postoperative patients with colorectal cancer.

Design: A cross-sectional study.

Setting: Conducted in two tertiary hospitals in China.

Participants: A total of 210 postoperative patients with colorectal cancer were included in the study.

Main measures: Two hundred and ten postoperative patients with colorectal cancer who were working at the time of their diagnosis were assessed with the Perceived Social Support Scale, the Return-To-Work Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, Cancer Fatigue Scale, and Social Impact Scale. Descriptive statistics, univariate logistic regression analysis, and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used for data analysis in SPSS 26.0.

Results: Around a third of participants (n = 74, 35.2%) returned to work after surgery. Multiple stepwise regression analysis indicated that more family income (odds ratio (OR) = 5.769, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.666-19.972), time span after surgery 5-10 months, and ≥10 months (OR = 3.546, 95% CI = 1.084-11.598; OR = 3.077, 95% CI = 1.074-8.818), with a stoma (OR = 0.221, 95% CI = 0.075-0.653), psychological distress (OR = 0.912, 95% CI = 0.843-0.987), cancer fatigue (OR = 0.924, 95% CI = 0.872-0.978), and stigma (OR = 0.928, 95% CI = 0.886-0.971) were significantly associated with return to work.

Conclusions: A high proportion of patients with colorectal cancer did not return to work within 1 year after diagnosis. Those with shorter postoperative time, lower family income, stoma, greater psychological stress, higher level of cancer fatigue, and more stigma may have a higher risk in delayed work resumption.

目的描述中国结直肠癌术后患者重返工作岗位的情况,并确定重返工作岗位的预测因素:设计:横断面研究:在中国两家三级医院进行:研究共纳入 210 名结直肠癌术后患者:采用感知社会支持量表、重返工作岗位自我效能问卷、凯斯勒心理压力量表、癌症疲劳量表和社会影响量表对210名确诊时有工作的结直肠癌术后患者进行评估。在 SPSS 26.0 中使用描述性统计、单变量逻辑回归分析和多变量逻辑回归分析进行数据分析:约三分之一的参与者(n = 74,35.2%)在术后重返工作岗位。多元逐步回归分析表明,家庭收入越高(几率比(OR)= 5.769,95% 置信区间(CI)= 1.666-19.972)、术后时间跨度为 5-10 个月和≥10 个月(OR = 3.546,95% CI = 1.084-11.598; OR = 3.077,95% CI = 1.074-8.818)、有造口(OR = 0.221,95% CI = 0.075-0.653)、心理困扰(OR = 0.912,95% CI = 0.843-0.987)、癌症疲劳(OR = 0.924,95% CI = 0.872-0.978)和耻辱感(OR = 0.928,95% CI = 0.886-0.971)与重返工作岗位显著相关:结论:很大一部分结直肠癌患者在确诊后一年内无法重返工作岗位。那些术后时间较短、家庭收入较低、有造口、心理压力较大、癌症疲劳程度较高以及耻辱感较强的患者可能有更高的延迟恢复工作的风险。
{"title":"Predictors of return to work among postoperative patients with colorectal cancer.","authors":"Ning Zhang, Fan Yang, Wenlong Di, Shujie Wang, Zijing Wu","doi":"10.1177/02692155241264773","DOIUrl":"10.1177/02692155241264773","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the status of return to work and identify predictors of return to work among Chinese postoperative patients with colorectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Conducted in two tertiary hospitals in China.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 210 postoperative patients with colorectal cancer were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Two hundred and ten postoperative patients with colorectal cancer who were working at the time of their diagnosis were assessed with the Perceived Social Support Scale, the Return-To-Work Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, Kessler Psychological Distress Scale, Cancer Fatigue Scale, and Social Impact Scale. Descriptive statistics, univariate logistic regression analysis, and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used for data analysis in SPSS 26.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Around a third of participants (n = 74, 35.2%) returned to work after surgery. Multiple stepwise regression analysis indicated that more family income (odds ratio (OR) = 5.769, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.666-19.972), time span after surgery 5-10 months, and ≥10 months (OR = 3.546, 95% CI = 1.084-11.598; OR = 3.077, 95% CI = 1.074-8.818), with a stoma (OR = 0.221, 95% CI = 0.075-0.653), psychological distress (OR = 0.912, 95% CI = 0.843-0.987), cancer fatigue (OR = 0.924, 95% CI = 0.872-0.978), and stigma (OR = 0.928, 95% CI = 0.886-0.971) were significantly associated with return to work.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A high proportion of patients with colorectal cancer did not return to work within 1 year after diagnosis. Those with shorter postoperative time, lower family income, stoma, greater psychological stress, higher level of cancer fatigue, and more stigma may have a higher risk in delayed work resumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1559-1568"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141757572","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy, safety of and adherence to adjustable compression wraps in the control phase of breast cancer-related lymphedema: A randomized controlled trial. 在乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的控制阶段使用可调节压力裹布的有效性、安全性和依从性:随机对照试验。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-09 DOI: 10.1177/02692155241270921
Jéssica Malena Pedro da Silva, Raul Denner Duarte Araújo, Suzana Sales de Aguiar, Erica Alves Nogueira Fabro, Marcus Vinicius de Mello Pinto, Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler, Anke Bergmann

Objective: To evaluate efficacy, safety, and adherence to using adjustable compression wraps (ACWs) for upper limb volume control in women with breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Design and setting: Randomized controlled trial at a reference hospital for breast cancer treatment in Brazil.

Participants: Women in control phase of the breast cancer-related lymphedema.

Interventions: Compared use of ACWs versus compressive mesh.

Main measures: Evaluated before treatment, at 30 days, and 6 months after initiating therapy. The primary outcome was the change in excess limb volume. Secondary outcomes included adherence, incidence of adverse events, functionality, quality of life, and hand grip. Statistical analysis involved calculating the effect size (ES) with a 95% confidence interval.

Results: Were included 71 women with mean excess limb volume of 321.79 mL (±194.98). In the 30-day analysis (Time 1), a reduction of 37.6 mL in volume was observed only in the ACW group (p = .041, ES 0.20), with improved functionality (p = .013, ES 0.22). In the six months analysis (Time 2), the compressive mesh group increased by 2.48% in volume (p = .023, ES 0.26) and demonstrated improvement functionality (p = .036, ES 0.27). Mild adverse events and satisfactory adherence were observed. However, in the intergroup comparison, no statistically significant difference was observed for any evaluated outcome-excess volume, incidence of adverse events, adherence, hand grip, quality of life, and functionality between the groups (p > .05) at both times.

Conclusions: Both compression therapies achieved satisfactory adherence, were safe, effective and equivalent for controlling limb volume in breast cancer-related lymphedema.

目的评估使用可调节压力裹布(ACW)控制乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿妇女上肢水肿的疗效、安全性和依从性:在巴西一家乳腺癌治疗参考医院进行的随机对照试验:干预措施:主要测量指标:治疗前、治疗后30天的评估:主要测量指标:在治疗前、治疗后30天和6个月进行评估。主要结果是肢体多余体积的变化。次要结果包括依从性、不良事件发生率、功能、生活质量和手部握力。统计分析包括计算效应大小(ES)和 95% 的置信区间:共纳入 71 名女性,她们的平均肢体超重量为 321.79 毫升(±194.98)。在 30 天的分析(时间 1)中,只观察到 ACW 组的体积减少了 37.6 毫升(p = 0.041,ES 0.20),功能得到改善(p = 0.013,ES 0.22)。在六个月的分析中(时间 2),压缩网片组的体积增加了 2.48%(p = .023,ES 0.26),功能也有所改善(p = .036,ES 0.27)。不良反应轻微,依从性令人满意。然而,在组间比较中,没有观察到两组之间在任何评估结果上有统计学意义的差异(p > .05):结论:两种压力疗法在控制乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿患者肢体体积方面的依从性、安全性、有效性和等效性均令人满意。
{"title":"Efficacy, safety of and adherence to adjustable compression wraps in the control phase of breast cancer-related lymphedema: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Jéssica Malena Pedro da Silva, Raul Denner Duarte Araújo, Suzana Sales de Aguiar, Erica Alves Nogueira Fabro, Marcus Vinicius de Mello Pinto, Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler, Anke Bergmann","doi":"10.1177/02692155241270921","DOIUrl":"10.1177/02692155241270921","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate efficacy, safety, and adherence to using adjustable compression wraps (ACWs) for upper limb volume control in women with breast cancer-related lymphedema.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Randomized controlled trial at a reference hospital for breast cancer treatment in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Women in control phase of the breast cancer-related lymphedema.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Compared use of ACWs versus compressive mesh.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Evaluated before treatment, at 30 days, and 6 months after initiating therapy. The primary outcome was the change in excess limb volume. Secondary outcomes included adherence, incidence of adverse events, functionality, quality of life, and hand grip. Statistical analysis involved calculating the effect size (ES) with a 95% confidence interval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Were included 71 women with mean excess limb volume of 321.79 mL (±194.98). In the 30-day analysis (Time 1), a reduction of 37.6 mL in volume was observed only in the ACW group (<i>p</i> = .041, ES 0.20), with improved functionality (<i>p</i> = .013, ES 0.22). In the six months analysis (Time 2), the compressive mesh group increased by 2.48% in volume (<i>p</i> = .023, ES 0.26) and demonstrated improvement functionality (<i>p</i> = .036, ES 0.27). Mild adverse events and satisfactory adherence were observed. However, in the intergroup comparison, no statistically significant difference was observed for any evaluated outcome-excess volume, incidence of adverse events, adherence, hand grip, quality of life, and functionality between the groups (<i>p</i> > .05) at both times.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both compression therapies achieved satisfactory adherence, were safe, effective and equivalent for controlling limb volume in breast cancer-related lymphedema.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1481-1494"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141906116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The impact of delays in transfer to specialist rehabilitation on outcomes in patients with acquired brain injury. 后天性脑损伤患者延迟转入专科康复治疗对疗效的影响。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-25 DOI: 10.1177/02692155241284866
Lloyd Bradley, Sally Wheelwright

Objective: To determine the effect of time waiting for admission to inpatient neurorehabilitation following acquired brain injury on rehabilitation outcomes.

Design: A retrospective observational case series.

Setting: A specialist brain injury inpatient rehabilitation service.

Subjects: Consecutive 235 admissions to specialist brain injury rehabilitation following acutely-acquired brain injury between 2019 and 2022.

Main measures: Waiting time from the point of injury to admission, diagnostic category, admission complexity (patient categorisation tool), functional status (functional independence measure/functional attainment measure), care needs (Northwick Park Care Needs Assessment), change in functional status and care needs over duration of admission (efficiency). Subgroup analysis was performed for patients with a tracheostomy, enteral feeding, anticonvulsant treatment and prior neurosurgery.

Results: There was no relationship between admission wait and initial complexity (rs = 0.006; p = 0.923), functional status (rs = -0.070; p = 0.284) or care needs (rs = 0.019; p = 0.768). Longer waiting times were significantly associated with reduced efficiency of rehabilitation (rs = -0.240; p = 0.0002) and change of care needs (rs = -0.246; p = 0.0001). Longer waits were associated with reduced rehabilitation efficiency for patients prescribed anticonvulsants (n = 115; rs = -0.243; p = 0.009), with a tracheostomy (n = 46; rs = -0.362; p = 0.013), requiring enteral nutrition (n = 137; rs = -0.237; p = 0.005) or having had intracranial surgery (n = 97; rs = -0.344; p = 0.0006). There was a negative association between waiting times and reduction in care needs for patients admitted on anticonvulsants (rs = -0.319; p = 0.0005) and requiring enteral nutrition (rs = -0.269; p = 0.001).

Conclusion: Longer wait for transfer to rehabilitation following brain injury is associated with reduced improvement in functional status and care needs over time. Attention should be given to ensuring rapid transfer into inpatient rehabilitation services.

目的确定后天性脑损伤住院神经康复治疗的等待时间对康复效果的影响:设计:回顾性观察病例系列:环境:脑损伤专科住院康复服务:2019年至2022年期间连续235名急性获得性脑损伤后入住脑损伤专科康复的患者:从受伤到入院的等待时间、诊断类别、入院复杂性(患者分类工具)、功能状态(功能独立性测量/功能达到测量)、护理需求(诺斯维克公园护理需求评估)、入院期间功能状态和护理需求的变化(效率)。对气管造口术、肠道喂养、抗惊厥治疗和既往接受过神经外科手术的患者进行了分组分析:入院等待时间与初始复杂程度(rs = 0.006; p = 0.923)、功能状态(rs = -0.070; p = 0.284)或护理需求(rs = 0.019; p = 0.768)之间没有关系。等待时间较长与康复效率降低(rs = -0.240;p = 0.0002)和护理需求改变(rs = -0.246;p = 0.0001)明显相关。对于服用抗惊厥药(n = 115;rs = -0.243;p = 0.009)、使用气管造口术(n = 46;rs = -0.362;p = 0.013)、需要肠内营养(n = 137;rs = -0.237;p = 0.005)或接受过颅内手术(n = 97;rs = -0.344;p = 0.0006)的患者,等待时间较长与康复效率降低有关。对于服用抗惊厥药物(rs = -0.319;p = 0.0005)和需要肠内营养(rs = -0.269;p = 0.001)的患者,等待时间与护理需求的减少呈负相关:结论:脑损伤后转入康复中心的等待时间越长,随着时间的推移,功能状态和护理需求的改善程度就越低。应注意确保快速转入住院康复服务。
{"title":"The impact of delays in transfer to specialist rehabilitation on outcomes in patients with acquired brain injury.","authors":"Lloyd Bradley, Sally Wheelwright","doi":"10.1177/02692155241284866","DOIUrl":"10.1177/02692155241284866","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the effect of time waiting for admission to inpatient neurorehabilitation following acquired brain injury on rehabilitation outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective observational case series.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A specialist brain injury inpatient rehabilitation service.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Consecutive 235 admissions to specialist brain injury rehabilitation following acutely-acquired brain injury between 2019 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Waiting time from the point of injury to admission, diagnostic category, admission complexity (patient categorisation tool), functional status (functional independence measure/functional attainment measure), care needs (Northwick Park Care Needs Assessment), change in functional status and care needs over duration of admission (efficiency). Subgroup analysis was performed for patients with a tracheostomy, enteral feeding, anticonvulsant treatment and prior neurosurgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no relationship between admission wait and initial complexity (<i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= 0.006; <i>p</i> = 0.923), functional status (<i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.070; <i>p</i> = 0.284) or care needs (<i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= 0.019; <i>p</i> = 0.768). Longer waiting times were significantly associated with reduced efficiency of rehabilitation (<i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.240; <i>p</i> = 0.0002) and change of care needs (<i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.246; <i>p</i> = 0.0001). Longer waits were associated with reduced rehabilitation efficiency for patients prescribed anticonvulsants (<i>n</i> = 115; <i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.243; <i>p</i> = 0.009), with a tracheostomy (<i>n</i> = 46; <i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.362; <i>p</i> = 0.013), requiring enteral nutrition (<i>n</i> = 137; <i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.237; <i>p</i> = 0.005) or having had intracranial surgery (<i>n</i> = 97; <i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.344; <i>p</i> = 0.0006). There was a negative association between waiting times and reduction in care needs for patients admitted on anticonvulsants (<i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.319; <i>p</i> = 0.0005) and requiring enteral nutrition (<i>r</i><sub>s </sub>= -0.269; <i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Longer wait for transfer to rehabilitation following brain injury is associated with reduced improvement in functional status and care needs over time. Attention should be given to ensuring rapid transfer into inpatient rehabilitation services.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1552-1558"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142342924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to reduce burden, stress, and strain in informal stroke caregivers. 减少中风非正式照护者负担、压力和紧张的随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI: 10.1177/02692155241271047
Melissa Jammal, Gregory S Kolt, Karen P Y Liu, Justin M Guagliano, Nariman Dennaoui, Emma S George

Objectives: To understand the nature and effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving informal stroke caregiver burden, stress, and strain.

Data sources: In line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic search of CENTRAL, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycInfo, and Web of Science was conducted in May 2022.

Review methods: Studies were eligible if they included an intervention designed for informal stroke caregivers, reported on caregiver burden, strain, or stress, were published in English, and used a randomized controlled trial design. An updated search was conducted in June 2024. The methodological quality of studies was appraised using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The data were pooled, and a meta-analysis was completed for caregiver burden and strain outcomes.

Results: Nineteen studies met inclusion criteria and were meta-analyzed. Interventions ranged from 4 days to 12 months. Most studies incorporated educational and/or support components. Meta-analyses revealed nonsignificant effects on caregiver burden or strain. Significant between-group differences for caregiver strain and burden were, however, found in seven studies.

Conclusion: Limited studies, small sample sizes, and conflicting results made definitive conclusions on the most effective intervention characteristics for improving caregiver outcomes difficult. Of the 19 studies, seven found significant between-group differences for caregiver outcomes postintervention, and these tended to incorporate educational components and comprised between seven and nine sessions. Further high-quality research is required to identify optimal format, duration, and frequency for improving caregiver outcomes.

目的了解旨在改善非正式卒中照护者负担、压力和紧张的干预措施的性质和有效性:根据《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》指南,于 2022 年 5 月对 CENTRAL、CINAHL、MEDLINE、Embase、APA PsycInfo 和 Web of Science 进行了系统检索:符合条件的研究必须包括为卒中非正式照护者设计的干预措施,报告了照护者的负担、压力或紧张,以英语发表,并采用随机对照试验设计。2024 年 6 月进行了更新检索。研究的方法学质量采用 Cochrane 随机试验偏倚风险工具进行评估。对数据进行了汇总,并完成了对照顾者负担和劳累结果的荟萃分析:19项研究符合纳入标准,并进行了荟萃分析。干预时间从 4 天到 12 个月不等。大多数研究纳入了教育和/或支持内容。荟萃分析表明,干预对照顾者的负担或压力没有显著影响。然而,有七项研究发现,照顾者的压力和负担在组间存在显著差异:有限的研究、较小的样本量以及相互矛盾的结果使得我们很难就改善照顾者结果的最有效干预特征得出明确的结论。在 19 项研究中,有 7 项研究发现干预后照护者的结果在组间存在显著差异,这些研究往往包含教育内容,并包含 7 到 9 个疗程。需要进一步开展高质量的研究,以确定改善照顾者效果的最佳形式、持续时间和频率。
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to reduce burden, stress, and strain in informal stroke caregivers.","authors":"Melissa Jammal, Gregory S Kolt, Karen P Y Liu, Justin M Guagliano, Nariman Dennaoui, Emma S George","doi":"10.1177/02692155241271047","DOIUrl":"10.1177/02692155241271047","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To understand the nature and effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving informal stroke caregiver burden, stress, and strain.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>In line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic search of CENTRAL, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycInfo, and Web of Science was conducted in May 2022.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Studies were eligible if they included an intervention designed for informal stroke caregivers, reported on caregiver burden, strain, or stress, were published in English, and used a randomized controlled trial design. An updated search was conducted in June 2024. The methodological quality of studies was appraised using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The data were pooled, and a meta-analysis was completed for caregiver burden and strain outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen studies met inclusion criteria and were meta-analyzed. Interventions ranged from 4 days to 12 months. Most studies incorporated educational and/or support components. Meta-analyses revealed nonsignificant effects on caregiver burden or strain. Significant between-group differences for caregiver strain and burden were, however, found in seven studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Limited studies, small sample sizes, and conflicting results made definitive conclusions on the most effective intervention characteristics for improving caregiver outcomes difficult. Of the 19 studies, seven found significant between-group differences for caregiver outcomes postintervention, and these tended to incorporate educational components and comprised between seven and nine sessions. Further high-quality research is required to identify optimal format, duration, and frequency for improving caregiver outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1429-1445"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528954/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142079498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Relationships between physical activities performed under free-living conditions and non-motor symptoms in people with Parkinson's: A systematic review and meta-analysis. 帕金森病患者在自由生活条件下进行的体力活动与非运动症状之间的关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-23 DOI: 10.1177/02692155241272967
Amanda Still, Leigh Hale, Sarfaraz Alam, Meg E Morris, Prasath Jayakaran

Background: Physical activities performed under free-living conditions that are unsupervised in the home or community have the potential to modulate non-motor symptoms in people with Parkinson's disease.

Objective: This systematic review investigates the relationships between physical activities performed in free-living conditions and non-motor symptoms in people with Parkinson's disease: cognition, anxiety, apathy, depression, sleep disturbances, fatigue, and pain.

Data sources: A database search was performed on Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid (PsycINFO), CINAHL, PubMed, and ProQuest (Health and Medicine).

Review methods: Observational studies published from 2000 to 2024 that examined the relationships between physical activity and non-motor symptoms were included. The methodological quality of reports was evaluated using critical appraisal checklists appropriate to the study design. Where appropriate, a meta-analysis was conducted to combine data from the included articles.

Results: A total of 14 articles met the criteria and used various tools to evaluate non-motor symptoms and physical activity. Meta-analyses showed that people with Parkinson's who are more physically active have better global cognition [β ranged from 0.12 to 0.28; p = 0.00-0.02] and less affective disorders [β -0.20, p = 0.00]. Increased physical activity levels were also associated with better sleep quality (n = 1) and less chronic pain (n = 1). The overall methodological quality of the included articles was considered high.

Conclusion: Engagement in increased levels of physical activities performed under free-living conditions is associated with better cognition and less anxiety, apathy, and depression in people with Parkinson's disease.

背景:在家庭或社区中,在无人监督的自由生活条件下进行的体育活动有可能调节帕金森病患者的非运动症状:本系统综述调查了在自由生活条件下进行的体育活动与帕金森病患者非运动症状(认知、焦虑、冷漠、抑郁、睡眠障碍、疲劳和疼痛)之间的关系:在 Scopus、Web of Science、Ovid(PsycINFO)、CINAHL、PubMed 和 ProQuest(健康与医学)数据库中进行了检索:综述方法:纳入了 2000 年至 2024 年间发表的观察性研究,这些研究探讨了体育锻炼与非运动症状之间的关系。采用与研究设计相适应的批判性评估清单对报告的方法学质量进行评估。在适当的情况下,对所纳入文章的数据进行了荟萃分析:共有 14 篇文章符合标准,并使用了各种工具来评估非运动症状和体力活动。荟萃分析表明,体力活动较多的帕金森病患者有较好的整体认知能力[β在0.12至0.28之间;p = 0.00-0.02],情感障碍也较少[β-0.20,p = 0.00]。体育锻炼水平的提高还与睡眠质量的改善(n = 1)和慢性疼痛的减少(n = 1)有关。所纳入文章的总体方法学质量较高:结论:帕金森病患者在自由生活条件下参与更多体育活动与改善认知、减少焦虑、冷漠和抑郁有关。
{"title":"Relationships between physical activities performed under free-living conditions and non-motor symptoms in people with Parkinson's: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Amanda Still, Leigh Hale, Sarfaraz Alam, Meg E Morris, Prasath Jayakaran","doi":"10.1177/02692155241272967","DOIUrl":"10.1177/02692155241272967","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activities performed under free-living conditions that are unsupervised in the home or community have the potential to modulate non-motor symptoms in people with Parkinson's disease.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review investigates the relationships between physical activities performed in free-living conditions and non-motor symptoms in people with Parkinson's disease: cognition, anxiety, apathy, depression, sleep disturbances, fatigue, and pain.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A database search was performed on Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid (PsycINFO), CINAHL, PubMed, and ProQuest (Health and Medicine).</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Observational studies published from 2000 to 2024 that examined the relationships between physical activity and non-motor symptoms were included. The methodological quality of reports was evaluated using critical appraisal checklists appropriate to the study design. Where appropriate, a meta-analysis was conducted to combine data from the included articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 articles met the criteria and used various tools to evaluate non-motor symptoms and physical activity. Meta-analyses showed that people with Parkinson's who are more physically active have better global cognition [<i>β</i> ranged from 0.12 to 0.28; <i>p </i>= 0.00-0.02] and less affective disorders [<i>β</i> -0.20, <i>p </i>= 0.00]. Increased physical activity levels were also associated with better sleep quality (<i>n</i> = 1) and less chronic pain (<i>n</i> = 1). The overall methodological quality of the included articles was considered high.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Engagement in increased levels of physical activities performed under free-living conditions is associated with better cognition and less anxiety, apathy, and depression in people with Parkinson's disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1534-1551"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528973/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142035412","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical Rehabilitation
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1