Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-05-15DOI: 10.1177/02692155241254250
Gregory Booth, Amanda Di Rosa, Paula Corcoran, Charlotte Hallisey, Andrew Lucas, Roxaneh Zarnegar
Objective: This study aimed to understand the impact of pain management programmes, focusing on the unwanted effects and their influence on patients' long-term use of self-management strategies.
Design: Qualitative study.
Setting: Specialist musculoskeletal hospital in North London, England.
Participants: Patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain that have completed a pain management programme.
Main measures: Data were collected regarding patients' experiences and unwanted effects from the pain management programme using semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
Results: Fourteen participant interviews were included in the analysis (median age 54 years, 12 females). Four themes were generated from the data: Benefits and burdens, Pain management programme and real life, Social support and Healthcare interventions. Unwanted effects included heightened anxiety related to negative interactions with peers, being in a new environment, worries about ability to cope with the programme, social anxiety from being in a group, the strain on families due to participants being away from home and a sense of abandonment at end of the programme. Burdens associated with implementing pain management strategies were identified, including the emotional burden of imposing their self-management on close family and competing demands with time and energy spent on self-management at the expense of work or home commitments.
Conclusions: Pain management programmes have an important role in helping patients to learn how to self-manage chronic pain. Their unwanted effects and the treatment burdens associated with long-term self-management may be an important consideration in improving the longevity of their beneficial effects.
{"title":"Patient perspectives on the unwanted effects of multidisciplinary pain management programmes: A qualitative study.","authors":"Gregory Booth, Amanda Di Rosa, Paula Corcoran, Charlotte Hallisey, Andrew Lucas, Roxaneh Zarnegar","doi":"10.1177/02692155241254250","DOIUrl":"10.1177/02692155241254250","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to understand the impact of pain management programmes, focusing on the unwanted effects and their influence on patients' long-term use of self-management strategies.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Specialist musculoskeletal hospital in North London, England.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain that have completed a pain management programme.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Multidisciplinary pain management programmes.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Data were collected regarding patients' experiences and unwanted effects from the pain management programme using semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen participant interviews were included in the analysis (median age 54 years, 12 females). Four themes were generated from the data: Benefits and burdens, Pain management programme and real life, Social support and Healthcare interventions. Unwanted effects included heightened anxiety related to negative interactions with peers, being in a new environment, worries about ability to cope with the programme, social anxiety from being in a group, the strain on families due to participants being away from home and a sense of abandonment at end of the programme. Burdens associated with implementing pain management strategies were identified, including the emotional burden of imposing their self-management on close family and competing demands with time and energy spent on self-management at the expense of work or home commitments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pain management programmes have an important role in helping patients to learn how to self-manage chronic pain. Their unwanted effects and the treatment burdens associated with long-term self-management may be an important consideration in improving the longevity of their beneficial effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1118-1129"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140921293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-03-20DOI: 10.1177/02692155241239811
Edwina Sutherland, Gavin Williams, Fiona Dobson, Bridget Hill, Chi Ching Angie Woo, Belinda Lawford
Objective: To determine the common understanding of focal muscle spasticity guidelines amongst clinicians working in spasticity clinics. To examine the facilitators and barriers to their implementation as well as their influence on clinic processes.
Design: A qualitative study based on a phenomenological approach.
Setting: Online videoconferencing platform.
Participants: Sixteen experienced multi-disciplinary clinicians providing specialised care across 12 spasticity clinics in Victoria, Australia.
Intervention: Observational.
Main measures: Two independent reviewers performed line by line coding of transcripts. Reflexive thematic analysis was undertaken with themes/subthemes inductively derived.
Results: Seven key themes emerged. First, knowledge of specific guideline recommendations was low amongst some clinicians. Second, there is a lack of health service resources to support guideline implementation. Third, a limited evidence base for guidelines affected clinicians' willingness to implement the recommendations. Fourth, peer support was highly valued but opportunities to collaborate were limited. Fifth, a large amount of intrinsic motivation and personal time was required from clinicians to successfully implement guideline recommendations. Sixth, the standardisation of clinic processes was one way in which clinicians felt they could better align their clinical practice to guidelines. Lastly, guidelines overall had a moderate influence on spasticity clinic processes.
Conclusions: Knowledge of recommendations varied but, overall, guidelines had an influence on clinic processes and staff perceptions across the state-wide services. Health service resources, limited evidence for guideline recommendations and time constraints were considered barriers to spasticity guideline implementation. Multi-disciplinary expertise and teamwork, the individual's motivation to change and inter-clinic collaboration were considered to be the facilitators.
{"title":"To what extent are guidelines used in spasticity clinics? A qualitative study of facilitators and barriers to spasticity guideline implementation.","authors":"Edwina Sutherland, Gavin Williams, Fiona Dobson, Bridget Hill, Chi Ching Angie Woo, Belinda Lawford","doi":"10.1177/02692155241239811","DOIUrl":"10.1177/02692155241239811","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the common understanding of focal muscle spasticity guidelines amongst clinicians working in spasticity clinics. To examine the facilitators and barriers to their implementation as well as their influence on clinic processes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative study based on a phenomenological approach.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online videoconferencing platform.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Sixteen experienced multi-disciplinary clinicians providing specialised care across 12 spasticity clinics in Victoria, Australia.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Observational.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Two independent reviewers performed line by line coding of transcripts. Reflexive thematic analysis was undertaken with themes/subthemes inductively derived.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven key themes emerged. First, knowledge of specific guideline recommendations was low amongst some clinicians. Second, there is a lack of health service resources to support guideline implementation. Third, a limited evidence base for guidelines affected clinicians' willingness to implement the recommendations. Fourth, peer support was highly valued but opportunities to collaborate were limited. Fifth, a large amount of intrinsic motivation and personal time was required from clinicians to successfully implement guideline recommendations. Sixth, the standardisation of clinic processes was one way in which clinicians felt they could better align their clinical practice to guidelines. Lastly, guidelines overall had a moderate influence on spasticity clinic processes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Knowledge of recommendations varied but, overall, guidelines had an influence on clinic processes and staff perceptions across the state-wide services. Health service resources, limited evidence for guideline recommendations and time constraints were considered barriers to spasticity guideline implementation. Multi-disciplinary expertise and teamwork, the individual's motivation to change and inter-clinic collaboration were considered to be the facilitators.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1101-1108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140174032","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-05-13DOI: 10.1177/02692155241253779
Irene Cortés-Pérez, Laura Moreno-Montilla, Alfonso Javier Ibáñez-Vera, Ángeles Díaz-Fernández, Esteban Obrero-Gaitán, Rafael Lomas-Vega
Objective: To compare the efficacy of extracorporeal shock waves versus corticosteroids injections on pain, thickness of plantar fascia and foot function in patients with plantar fasciitis. Secondarily, to assess the efficacy of radial and focused extracorporeal shock waves and the most appropriated intensity (high, medium or low).
Data sources: PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL and PEDro, until April 2024, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
Review methods: Randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of extracorporeal shock waves versus corticosteroids injections on pain intensity and sensitivity, thickness of plantar fascia and foot function in patients with plantar fasciitis. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using PEDro Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Pooled effect was calculated using the standardized mean difference (SMD) and its 95% confidence interval (95%CI).
Results: Sixteen studies involving 1121 patients, showing a mean of 6 points in PEDro scale, were included. At three months, extracorporeal shock waves were better than corticosteroids injections in reducing pain (SMD -0.6; 95%CI -1.1 to -0.11) and thickness of the plantar fascia (SMD -0.4; 95%CI -0.8 to -0.01) and increasing foot function (SMD 0.27; 95%CI 0.12-0.44). At six months, extracorporeal shock waves are more effective in reducing pain (SMD -0.81; 95%CI -1.6 to -0.06) and increasing foot function (SMD 0.67; 95%CI 0.45-0.89). Local pain and slight erythema were the most frequent adverse events.
Conclusions: Extracorporeal shock waves are a safe therapy, presenting more efficacy than corticosteroids injections in improving pain, thickness of plantar fascia and foot function at mid-term.
{"title":"Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave therapy, compared to corticosteroid injections, on pain, plantar fascia thickness and foot function in patients with plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Irene Cortés-Pérez, Laura Moreno-Montilla, Alfonso Javier Ibáñez-Vera, Ángeles Díaz-Fernández, Esteban Obrero-Gaitán, Rafael Lomas-Vega","doi":"10.1177/02692155241253779","DOIUrl":"10.1177/02692155241253779","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of extracorporeal shock waves versus corticosteroids injections on pain, thickness of plantar fascia and foot function in patients with plantar fasciitis. Secondarily, to assess the efficacy of radial and focused extracorporeal shock waves and the most appropriated intensity (high, medium or low).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, SCOPUS, CINAHL and PEDro, until April 2024, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of extracorporeal shock waves versus corticosteroids injections on pain intensity and sensitivity, thickness of plantar fascia and foot function in patients with plantar fasciitis. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using PEDro Scale and Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Pooled effect was calculated using the standardized mean difference (SMD) and its 95% confidence interval (95%CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies involving 1121 patients, showing a mean of 6 points in PEDro scale, were included. At three months, extracorporeal shock waves were better than corticosteroids injections in reducing pain (SMD -0.6; 95%CI -1.1 to -0.11) and thickness of the plantar fascia (SMD -0.4; 95%CI -0.8 to -0.01) and increasing foot function (SMD 0.27; 95%CI 0.12-0.44). At six months, extracorporeal shock waves are more effective in reducing pain (SMD -0.81; 95%CI -1.6 to -0.06) and increasing foot function (SMD 0.67; 95%CI 0.45-0.89). Local pain and slight erythema were the most frequent adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Extracorporeal shock waves are a safe therapy, presenting more efficacy than corticosteroids injections in improving pain, thickness of plantar fascia and foot function at mid-term.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1023-1043"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140911766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture therapy for neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease.
Methods: We searched eight databases from their inception until 14 April 2024, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Periodical Database, and Wanfang Database. The search aimed to find randomized controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of acupuncture for neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease. Literature screening and data extraction were performed independently by the authors. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan V.5.3 software, and Stata 17.0 software was used for detecting publication bias and performing sensitivity analysis.
Results: Twenty-eight studies, involving 2148 participants, met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that acupuncture therapy improved depression-related scale scores (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.70, 95%CI [-0.98, -0.42], p < 0.00001), anxiety-related scale scores (SMD = -0.78, 95% CI [-1.43, -0.14], p = 0.02), Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores (weighted mean difference (WMD) = 2.74, 95% CI [2.43, 3.05], p < 0.00001), Mini Mental State Examination scores (WMD = 2.36, 95% CI [0.78, 3.94], p = 0.003), Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale scores, and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 scores (WMD = -2.66, 95% CI [-4.83, -0.49], p = 0.02) compared to controls.
Conclusion: This review supports the application of acupuncture to reduce the severity of neuropsychiatric symptoms including depression, anxiety, and impulse control disorders, and to improve cognition and quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease. The adverse effects associated with acupuncture, either alone or as adjunctive therapy, were relatively minor.
目的:系统评估针灸疗法对帕金森病患者神经精神症状的疗效和安全性:系统评估针灸治疗帕金森病患者神经精神症状的有效性和安全性:我们检索了从开始到2024年4月14日的8个数据库,包括PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、Web of Science、SinoMed、中国国家知识基础设施、中国科技期刊数据库和万方数据库。该检索旨在寻找评估针灸对帕金森病患者神经精神症状疗效的随机对照试验。文献筛选和数据提取由作者独立完成。使用RevMan V.5.3软件进行Meta分析,并使用Stata 17.0软件检测发表偏倚和进行敏感性分析:符合纳入标准的研究有 28 项,涉及 2148 名参与者。荟萃分析显示,针灸疗法改善了抑郁相关量表评分(标准化平均差(SMD)= -0.70,95%CI [-0.98,-0.42],P = 0.02)、蒙特利尔认知评估评分(加权平均差(WMD)= 2.74,95% CI [2.43,3.05],p p = 0.003)、耶鲁-布朗强迫量表评分和帕金森病问卷-39评分(WMD = -2.66,95% CI [-4.83,-0.49],p = 0.02)与对照组相比均有显著性差异:本综述支持应用针灸减轻帕金森病患者神经精神症状的严重程度,包括抑郁、焦虑和冲动控制障碍,并改善认知和生活质量。无论是单独使用针灸还是作为辅助疗法,与针灸相关的不良反应都相对较小。
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of acupuncture therapy for neuropsychiatric symptoms among patients with Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Weiqiang Tan, Fengxi Xie, Jixi Zhou, Zhaoquan Pan, Muxi Liao, Lixing Zhuang","doi":"10.1177/02692155241258278","DOIUrl":"10.1177/02692155241258278","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture therapy for neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched eight databases from their inception until 14 April 2024, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Periodical Database, and Wanfang Database. The search aimed to find randomized controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of acupuncture for neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease. Literature screening and data extraction were performed independently by the authors. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan V.5.3 software, and Stata 17.0 software was used for detecting publication bias and performing sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight studies, involving 2148 participants, met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that acupuncture therapy improved depression-related scale scores (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.70, 95%CI [-0.98, -0.42], <i>p </i>< 0.00001), anxiety-related scale scores (SMD = -0.78, 95% CI [-1.43, -0.14], <i>p </i>= 0.02), Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores (weighted mean difference (WMD) = 2.74, 95% CI [2.43, 3.05], <i>p </i>< 0.00001), Mini Mental State Examination scores (WMD = 2.36, 95% CI [0.78, 3.94], <i>p </i>= 0.003), Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale scores, and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 scores (WMD = -2.66, 95% CI [-4.83, -0.49], <i>p </i>= 0.02) compared to controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review supports the application of acupuncture to reduce the severity of neuropsychiatric symptoms including depression, anxiety, and impulse control disorders, and to improve cognition and quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease. The adverse effects associated with acupuncture, either alone or as adjunctive therapy, were relatively minor.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1044-1062"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11348633/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141261252","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-01Epub Date: 2024-05-06DOI: 10.1177/02692155241251844
Cláudio Gregório Nuernberg Back, Rafaela Peron, Camilla Vitória Rios Lopes, João Victor Estevam de Souza, Richard Eloin Liebano
Objective: To compare the immediate effects of shockwave therapy using two different tips in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.
Design: Randomised placebo-controlled study with three intervention groups.
Setting: The patients recruited for this study were sent for physiotherapy treatment at primary care between May and July 2022.
Participants: Eighty-one patients with chronic non-specific low back pain aged 18-80 years with pain for ≥3 months and pain intensity ≥3 were randomly recruited for the study.
Intervention: The patients received a single intervention of radial shockwave therapy with 2000 discharges at 100 mJ energy and 5 Hz frequency using concave or convex tips or placebo treatment.
Main measures: The primary outcome was pain intensity immediately post-intervention. The secondary outcomes were pressure pain threshold, temporal summation of pain, and functional performance. Data were collected at baseline and post-intervention.
Results: The post-intervention pain intensity in the concave tip group is an average of two points lower (95% CI = -3.6, -0.4; p < 0.01) than that in the placebo group. The post-intervention pressure pain threshold for the concave tip group was an average of 62.8 kPa higher (95% CI = 0.4, 125.1; p < 0.05) than for the convex tip group and 76.4 kPa higher (95% CI = 14, 138.7; p < 0.01) than in the placebo group.
Conclusion: The concave tip shockwave therapy is effective in reducing pain and local hyperalgesia in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.
目的比较冲击波疗法对慢性非特异性腰背痛患者的直接效果:随机安慰剂对照研究,分为三个干预组:本研究招募的患者于2022年5月至7月期间在基层医疗机构接受物理治疗:随机招募81名年龄在18-80岁、疼痛时间≥3个月、疼痛强度≥3级的慢性非特异性腰背痛患者参与研究:患者接受一次放射状冲击波治疗,放电2000次,能量100 mJ,频率5 Hz,使用凹面或凸面尖端或安慰剂治疗:主要指标:主要指标是干预后的疼痛强度。次要结果是压力痛阈值、疼痛的时间累加和功能表现。在基线和干预后收集数据:结果:凹面尖端组干预后的疼痛强度平均降低两点(95% CI = -3.6,-0.4;p p p p 结论:凹面冲击波疗法能有效减轻慢性非特异性腰痛患者的疼痛和局部痛觉减退。
{"title":"Immediate effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: A randomised placebo-controlled triple-blind trial.","authors":"Cláudio Gregório Nuernberg Back, Rafaela Peron, Camilla Vitória Rios Lopes, João Victor Estevam de Souza, Richard Eloin Liebano","doi":"10.1177/02692155241251844","DOIUrl":"10.1177/02692155241251844","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the immediate effects of shockwave therapy using two different tips in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomised placebo-controlled study with three intervention groups.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The patients recruited for this study were sent for physiotherapy treatment at primary care between May and July 2022.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Eighty-one patients with chronic non-specific low back pain aged 18-80 years with pain for ≥3 months and pain intensity ≥3 were randomly recruited for the study.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The patients received a single intervention of radial shockwave therapy with 2000 discharges at 100 mJ energy and 5 Hz frequency using concave or convex tips or placebo treatment.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The primary outcome was pain intensity immediately post-intervention. The secondary outcomes were pressure pain threshold, temporal summation of pain, and functional performance. Data were collected at baseline and post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The post-intervention pain intensity in the concave tip group is an average of two points lower (95% CI = -3.6, -0.4; <i>p</i> < 0.01) than that in the placebo group. The post-intervention pressure pain threshold for the concave tip group was an average of 62.8 kPa higher (95% CI = 0.4, 125.1; <i>p</i> < 0.05) than for the convex tip group and 76.4 kPa higher (95% CI = 14, 138.7; <i>p</i> < 0.01) than in the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The concave tip shockwave therapy is effective in reducing pain and local hyperalgesia in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1080-1090"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140851736","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-03-05DOI: 10.1177/02692155241236602
Tom Steverson, Joseph Marsden, Joshua Blake
Objective: To explore the validity, reliability, and clinical utility of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - ten-item version (CORE-10: a ten-item questionnaire designed to measure psychological distress) in a stroke inpatient sample and calculate reliable and clinically significant change scores.
Setting: A post-acute stroke rehabilitation ward in the East of England.
Participants: A total of 53 patients with stroke, capable of completing the CORE-10 as part of their routine clinical assessment. Exclusion criteria included moderate to severe aphasia and/or alexia.
Main measures: Alongside the CORE-10, the Patient Health Questionnaire - 9, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Centre for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, and the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition were used as concurrent measures.
Results: To assess reliability, the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the CORE-10 were calculated. The average number of days between CORE-10 test-retest administrations was 2.84 (SD = 3.12, Mdn = 1). Concurrent validity was assessed by examining correlations between the CORE-10 and comparable measures, and clinical utility was assessed using the criteria of Burton and Tyson (2015). The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) for the CORE-10 was .80, and test-retest reliability interclass correlation coefficient was .81. Total score correlations between the CORE-10 and concurrent measures ranged from r = .49 to r = .89. The CORE-10 achieved the maximum score (i.e. 6/6) on criteria for clinical utility. Calculations demonstrated a reliable change index of nine points and a clinically significant change cut point of 12 on the CORE-10. Percentiles for CORE-10 total scores are reported.
Conclusions: This study provides preliminary support for the CORE-10 as a valid and reliable measure that has clinical utility for screening distress in inpatients with stroke.
{"title":"The reliability, validity and clinical utility of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - ten-item version (CORE-10) in post-acute patients with stroke.","authors":"Tom Steverson, Joseph Marsden, Joshua Blake","doi":"10.1177/02692155241236602","DOIUrl":"10.1177/02692155241236602","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the validity, reliability, and clinical utility of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - ten-item version (CORE-10: a ten-item questionnaire designed to measure psychological distress) in a stroke inpatient sample and calculate reliable and clinically significant change scores.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A post-acute stroke rehabilitation ward in the East of England.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 53 patients with stroke, capable of completing the CORE-10 as part of their routine clinical assessment. Exclusion criteria included moderate to severe aphasia and/or alexia.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Alongside the CORE-10, the Patient Health Questionnaire - 9, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Centre for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, and the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition were used as concurrent measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>To assess reliability, the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the CORE-10 were calculated. The average number of days between CORE-10 test-retest administrations was 2.84 (<i>SD</i> = 3.12, <i>Mdn</i> = 1). Concurrent validity was assessed by examining correlations between the CORE-10 and comparable measures, and clinical utility was assessed using the criteria of Burton and Tyson (2015). The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) for the CORE-10 was .80, and test-retest reliability interclass correlation coefficient was .81. Total score correlations between the CORE-10 and concurrent measures ranged from <i>r</i> = .49 to <i>r</i> = .89. The CORE-10 achieved the maximum score (i.e. 6/6) on criteria for clinical utility. Calculations demonstrated a reliable change index of nine points and a clinically significant change cut point of 12 on the CORE-10. Percentiles for CORE-10 total scores are reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides preliminary support for the CORE-10 as a valid and reliable measure that has clinical utility for screening distress in inpatients with stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"944-954"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11118775/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140027534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-03-31DOI: 10.1177/02692155241241665
Bianca Bigogno Reis Cazeta, Rodrigo Santos de Queiroz, Tais Silva Nacimento, Beatriz Reis Ferreira, Micheli Bernardone Saquetto, Bruno Prata Martinez, Vitor Oliveira Carvalho, Mansueto Gomes-Neto
Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyze the published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the effects of exercise interventions on functioning and health-related quality of life following hospital discharge for recovery from critical illness.
Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
Data sources: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro data base, and SciELO (from the earliest date available to January 2023) for RCTs that evaluated the effects of physical rehabilitation interventions following hospital discharge for recovery from critical illness.
Review methods: Study quality was evaluated using the PEDro Scale. Mean differences (MDs), standard MDs (SMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
Results: Fourteen studies met the study criteria, including 1259 patients. Exercise interventions improved aerobic capacity SMD 0.2 (95% CI: 0.03-0.3, I2 = 0% N = 880, nine studies, high-quality evidence), and physical component score of health-related quality of life MD 3.3 (95% CI: 1.0-5.6, I2 = 57%, six studies N = 669, moderate-quality evidence). In addition, a significant reduction in depression was observed MD -1.4 (95% CI: -2.7 to -0.1, I2 = 0% N = 148, three studies, moderate-quality evidence). No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusion: Exercise intervention was associated with improvement of aerobic capacity, depression, and physical component score of health-related quality of life after hospital discharge for survivors of critical illness.
目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在分析已发表的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验调查了运动干预对危重病人出院后的功能和与健康相关的生活质量的影响:设计:对随机对照试验进行系统回顾和荟萃分析:数据来源:我们检索了PubMed/MEDLINE、Cochrane对照试验中央登记册、PEDro数据库和SciELO(从最早可用日期到2023年1月)中评估危重病人出院后身体康复干预效果的RCT:采用 PEDro 量表评估研究质量。计算平均差(MD)、标准MD(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI):14项研究符合研究标准,包括1259名患者。运动干预改善了有氧运动能力,SMD 0.2(95% CI:0.03-0.3,I2 = 0%,9 项研究 N = 880,高质量证据),改善了健康相关生活质量的身体部分得分,MD 3.3(95% CI:1.0-5.6,I2 = 57%,6 项研究 N = 669,中等质量证据)。此外,还观察到抑郁症明显减轻,MD -1.4 (95% CI: -2.7 to -0.1, I2 = 0% N = 148, 三项研究,中等质量证据)。无严重不良事件报告:运动干预与危重病幸存者出院后有氧运动能力、抑郁和健康相关生活质量的身体成分得分的改善有关。
{"title":"Effects of exercise interventions on functioning and health-related quality of life following hospital discharge for recovery from critical illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.","authors":"Bianca Bigogno Reis Cazeta, Rodrigo Santos de Queiroz, Tais Silva Nacimento, Beatriz Reis Ferreira, Micheli Bernardone Saquetto, Bruno Prata Martinez, Vitor Oliveira Carvalho, Mansueto Gomes-Neto","doi":"10.1177/02692155241241665","DOIUrl":"10.1177/02692155241241665","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyze the published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the effects of exercise interventions on functioning and health-related quality of life following hospital discharge for recovery from critical illness.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro data base, and SciELO (from the earliest date available to January 2023) for RCTs that evaluated the effects of physical rehabilitation interventions following hospital discharge for recovery from critical illness.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Study quality was evaluated using the PEDro Scale. Mean differences (MDs), standard MDs (SMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies met the study criteria, including 1259 patients. Exercise interventions improved aerobic capacity SMD 0.2 (95% CI: 0.03-0.3, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0% <i>N</i> = 880, nine studies, high-quality evidence), and physical component score of health-related quality of life MD 3.3 (95% CI: 1.0-5.6, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 57%, six studies <i>N</i> = 669, moderate-quality evidence). In addition, a significant reduction in depression was observed MD -1.4 (95% CI: -2.7 to -0.1, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0% <i>N</i> = 148, three studies, moderate-quality evidence). No serious adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Exercise intervention was associated with improvement of aerobic capacity, depression, and physical component score of health-related quality of life after hospital discharge for survivors of critical illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"898-909"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140331571","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-03-20DOI: 10.1177/02692155241239879
Emma Patchwood, Hannah Foote, Andy Vail, Sarah Cotterill, Geoff Hill, Audrey Bowen
Objective: Feasibility test a co-developed intervention based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to support psychological adjustment post-stroke, delivered by a workforce with community in-reach.
Design: Observational feasibility study utilising patient, carer, public involvement.
Interventions: The co-developed Wellbeing After Stroke (WAterS) intervention includes: 9-weekly, structured, online, group sessions for stroke survivors, delivered via a training programme to upskill staff without Acceptance and Commitment Therapy experience, under Clinical Psychology supervision.
Main measures: Feasibility of recruitment and retention; data quality from candidate measures; safety. Clinical and demographic information at baseline; patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) via online surveys (baseline, pre- and post-intervention, 3 and 6 months after intervention end) including Mood (hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS)), Wellbeing (ONS4), Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ5D5L), Psychological Flexibility (AAQ-ABI) and Values-Based Living (VQ).
Results: We trained eight staff and recruited 17 stroke survivors with mild-to-moderate cognitive and communication difficulties. 12/17 (71%) joined three intervention groups with 98% attendance and no related adverse events. PROMS data were well-completed. The HADS is a possible future primary outcome (self-reported depression lower on average by 1.3 points: 8.5 pre-group to 7.1 at 3-month follow-up; 95% CI 0.4 to 3.2).
Conclusion: The WAterS intervention warrants further research evaluation. Staff can be trained and upskilled to deliver. It appears safe and feasible to deliver online to groups, and study recruitment and data collection are feasible. Funding has been secured to further develop the intervention, considering implementation and health equality.
{"title":"Wellbeing After Stroke (WAterS): Feasibility Testing of a Co-developed Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Intervention to Support Psychological Adjustment After Stroke.","authors":"Emma Patchwood, Hannah Foote, Andy Vail, Sarah Cotterill, Geoff Hill, Audrey Bowen","doi":"10.1177/02692155241239879","DOIUrl":"10.1177/02692155241239879","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Feasibility test a co-developed intervention based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to support psychological adjustment post-stroke, delivered by a workforce with community in-reach.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational feasibility study utilising patient, carer, public involvement.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online. UK.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Stroke survivors with self-reported psychological distress 4 + months post-stroke.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The co-developed Wellbeing After Stroke (WAterS) intervention includes: 9-weekly, structured, online, group sessions for stroke survivors, delivered via a training programme to upskill staff without Acceptance and Commitment Therapy experience, under Clinical Psychology supervision.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Feasibility of recruitment and retention; data quality from candidate measures; safety. Clinical and demographic information at baseline; patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) via online surveys (baseline, pre- and post-intervention, 3 and 6 months after intervention end) including Mood (hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS)), Wellbeing (ONS4), Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ5D5L), Psychological Flexibility (AAQ-ABI) and Values-Based Living (VQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We trained eight staff and recruited 17 stroke survivors with mild-to-moderate cognitive and communication difficulties. 12/17 (71%) joined three intervention groups with 98% attendance and no related adverse events. PROMS data were well-completed. The HADS is a possible future primary outcome (self-reported depression lower on average by 1.3 points: 8.5 pre-group to 7.1 at 3-month follow-up; 95% CI 0.4 to 3.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The WAterS intervention warrants further research evaluation. Staff can be trained and upskilled to deliver. It appears safe and feasible to deliver online to groups, and study recruitment and data collection are feasible. Funding has been secured to further develop the intervention, considering implementation and health equality.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"979-989"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11118776/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140174033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}