Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-12DOI: 10.1177/02692155251374575
Gemma Foley, Rose Galvin, Frances Horgan
ObjectiveTo explore the attitudes and practice of allied health professionals working in stroke care in Ireland regarding recommended amounts of therapy set out in the National Clinical Guideline for Stroke (2023).DesignQualitative descriptive study using one-to-one semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.SettingFive large acute teaching hospitals in Dublin, Ireland.ParticipantsThe 11 participants were allied health professionals working in acute and subacute stroke care in Dublin, and were recruited using a combination of purposive and snowball sampling.ResultsTwo main themes emerged: 'Barriers and enablers to achieving guideline recommended therapy time' and 'Methods of increasing therapeutic time'. Patient factors and clinical resources impact on the provision of therapy post-stroke. Overall, participants felt positive about the recent guideline recommendation for increased therapeutic time. Various methods are employed to augment patient therapeutic time, including technology and semi-supervised practice. Participants perceived that Therapy Assistants play an important role in achieving greater amounts of therapy.ConclusionsAllied health professionals view the new Stroke Guidelines recommendation for increased therapy intensity as challenging but are generally positive in trying to achieve it, citing the benefits of increased therapy time for patient outcomes. They utilise a wide range of methods to optimise therapeutic time for stroke survivors. The role of the therapy assistant in supporting the delivery of larger amounts of therapy time warrants further evaluation.
{"title":"Exploring allied health professionals' perceptions and practice in Ireland regarding guideline recommendations for intensity of multidisciplinary therapy for stroke survivors: A qualitative study.","authors":"Gemma Foley, Rose Galvin, Frances Horgan","doi":"10.1177/02692155251374575","DOIUrl":"10.1177/02692155251374575","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo explore the attitudes and practice of allied health professionals working in stroke care in Ireland regarding recommended amounts of therapy set out in the National Clinical Guideline for Stroke (2023).DesignQualitative descriptive study using one-to-one semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.SettingFive large acute teaching hospitals in Dublin, Ireland.ParticipantsThe 11 participants were allied health professionals working in acute and subacute stroke care in Dublin, and were recruited using a combination of purposive and snowball sampling.ResultsTwo main themes emerged: 'Barriers and enablers to achieving guideline recommended therapy time' and 'Methods of increasing therapeutic time'. Patient factors and clinical resources impact on the provision of therapy post-stroke. Overall, participants felt positive about the recent guideline recommendation for increased therapeutic time. Various methods are employed to augment patient therapeutic time, including technology and semi-supervised practice. Participants perceived that Therapy Assistants play an important role in achieving greater amounts of therapy.ConclusionsAllied health professionals view the new Stroke Guidelines recommendation for increased therapy intensity as challenging but are generally positive in trying to achieve it, citing the benefits of increased therapy time for patient outcomes. They utilise a wide range of methods to optimise therapeutic time for stroke survivors. The role of the therapy assistant in supporting the delivery of larger amounts of therapy time warrants further evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1504-1514"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145039271","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-23DOI: 10.1177/02692155251372114
Anne-Fleur Domensino, Johanna Ma Visser-Meily, Jacoba M Spikman, Caroline van Heugten
ObjectiveEvaluate the internal consistency, inter-rater and test-retest reliability, convergent and divergent validity and clinical usability of the Cognition in Daily Life scale for patients with acquired brain injury.DesignValidation study.ParticipantsA total of 75 patients with acquired brain injury (mostly male [n = 47, 68%]; mean age 67 years) were recruited from inpatient care facilities. Sixty participants (81%) had sustained a stroke.Main measuresOutcome measure: Cognition in Daily Life scale. Reference measures: Utrecht Scale for Rehabilitation-Cognition subscale, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Barthel Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Fatigue Severity Scale.ResultsAfter removing redundant items, all subscales of the Cognition in Daily Life scale demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was good (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.847), and inter-rater reliability was moderate (ICC = 0.615). Convergent validity was confirmed through moderately strong correlations between most subscales of the Cognition in Daily Life Scale and other measures of cognition. Cognition in Daily Life subscales generally did not correlate with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Fatigue Severity Scale, indicating divergent validity. Moderate correlations with the Barthel Index suggested related, but distinct constructs. Clinicians found the Cognition in Daily Life scale easy to administer and relevant for practice, though time-consuming. They suggested layout improvements for greater usability.ConclusionThe Cognition in Daily Life scale is adequately valid, reliable and clinically usable for assessing cognition in daily life in patients with acquired brain injury in a clinical setting. Future research needs to evaluate the scale's sensitivity to change and its performance in other settings and populations.
{"title":"Psychometric properties and clinical usability of the cognition in daily life scale in patients with acquired brain injury in clinical care settings.","authors":"Anne-Fleur Domensino, Johanna Ma Visser-Meily, Jacoba M Spikman, Caroline van Heugten","doi":"10.1177/02692155251372114","DOIUrl":"10.1177/02692155251372114","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveEvaluate the internal consistency, inter-rater and test-retest reliability, convergent and divergent validity and clinical usability of the Cognition in Daily Life scale for patients with acquired brain injury.DesignValidation study.ParticipantsA total of 75 patients with acquired brain injury (mostly male [<i>n</i> = 47, 68%]; mean age 67 years) were recruited from inpatient care facilities. Sixty participants (81%) had sustained a stroke.Main measures<i>Outcome measure:</i> Cognition in Daily Life scale. <i>Reference measures:</i> Utrecht Scale for Rehabilitation-Cognition subscale, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Barthel Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Fatigue Severity Scale.ResultsAfter removing redundant items, all subscales of the Cognition in Daily Life scale demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was good (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.847), and inter-rater reliability was moderate (ICC = 0.615). Convergent validity was confirmed through moderately strong correlations between most subscales of the Cognition in Daily Life Scale and other measures of cognition. Cognition in Daily Life subscales generally did not correlate with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Fatigue Severity Scale, indicating divergent validity. Moderate correlations with the Barthel Index suggested related, but distinct constructs. Clinicians found the Cognition in Daily Life scale easy to administer and relevant for practice, though time-consuming. They suggested layout improvements for greater usability.ConclusionThe Cognition in Daily Life scale is adequately valid, reliable and clinically usable for assessing cognition in daily life in patients with acquired brain injury in a clinical setting. Future research needs to evaluate the scale's sensitivity to change and its performance in other settings and populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1452-1466"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145124498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-16DOI: 10.1177/02692155251378371
Wenming Chu, Xiaoman Deng, Ling Gao, Xiyan Gao
{"title":"Response letter to \"Letter to the editor on a recent paper on acupuncture with pelvic floor rehabilitation training\".","authors":"Wenming Chu, Xiaoman Deng, Ling Gao, Xiyan Gao","doi":"10.1177/02692155251378371","DOIUrl":"10.1177/02692155251378371","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1543-1544"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145074341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-05DOI: 10.1177/02692155251374911
Someka Hijikuro, Takao Kaneko, Kohei Ikeda
ObjectiveThis scoping review aimed to comprehensively map interventions for post-stroke apathy and their effects.Data sourcesThe literature search for this review was performed using PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Web of Science, targeting studies published until August 7, 2025.Review methodsThis scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. The population included patients with post-stroke apathy; the concept focused on post-stroke apathy assessment and interventions and their effects. The context covered both general and community healthcare settings. Controlled vocabulary (e.g., MeSH terms) such as "post-stroke apathy," "intervention," and "effect" was used to formulate the search strategy. The eligible studies were independently screened by three reviewers, and final inclusion was determined through discussion.ResultsOf the 565 studies identified, 13 met the inclusion criteria (n = 13). The mapping revealed that pharmacological interventions not only improved and prevented post-stroke apathy symptoms but also alleviated emotional blunting, reduced loss of motivation and interest, and enhanced social behavior and participation. Non-pharmacological interventions were associated with symptom relief and recovery over time. Furthermore, combined pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches contributed to improvements not only in post-stroke apathy but also in depression, language function, and behavioral aspects.ConclusionThe findings suggest that appropriate treatment for post-stroke apathy may lead to symptom relief, improvement, and prevention while enhancing language function, behavior, and social participation. Future research should focus on systematic reviews and meta-analyses to establish evidence-based recommendations for post-stroke apathy treatment strategies and their optimal combinations.
目的:本综述旨在全面了解脑卒中后冷漠的干预措施及其效果。数据来源本综述的文献检索使用PubMed、护理和相关健康文献累积索引和Web of Science,目标是2025年8月7日之前发表的研究。综述方法:本综述按照系统综述和荟萃分析扩展的首选报告项目进行。人群包括卒中后冷漠患者;该概念侧重于脑卒中后冷漠的评估和干预措施及其效果。背景包括一般和社区卫生保健环境。控制词汇(例如MeSH术语)如“中风后冷漠”、“干预”和“效果”被用来制定搜索策略。符合条件的研究由三位审稿人独立筛选,并通过讨论确定最终纳入。结果纳入的565项研究中,13项符合纳入标准(n = 13)。该图谱显示,药物干预不仅可以改善和预防中风后的冷漠症状,还可以缓解情绪迟钝,减少动机和兴趣的丧失,增强社会行为和参与。随着时间的推移,非药物干预与症状缓解和恢复有关。此外,药物和非药物相结合的方法不仅有助于改善中风后的冷漠,还有助于改善抑郁、语言功能和行为方面。结论适当治疗脑卒中后冷漠可缓解、改善和预防症状,同时提高语言功能、行为和社会参与能力。未来的研究应侧重于系统评价和荟萃分析,以建立卒中后冷漠治疗策略及其最佳组合的循证建议。
{"title":"Interventions for post-stroke apathy and their effects: A scoping review.","authors":"Someka Hijikuro, Takao Kaneko, Kohei Ikeda","doi":"10.1177/02692155251374911","DOIUrl":"10.1177/02692155251374911","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis scoping review aimed to comprehensively map interventions for post-stroke apathy and their effects.Data sourcesThe literature search for this review was performed using PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Web of Science, targeting studies published until August 7, 2025.Review methodsThis scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. The population included patients with post-stroke apathy; the concept focused on post-stroke apathy assessment and interventions and their effects. The context covered both general and community healthcare settings. Controlled vocabulary (e.g., MeSH terms) such as \"post-stroke apathy,\" \"intervention,\" and \"effect\" was used to formulate the search strategy. The eligible studies were independently screened by three reviewers, and final inclusion was determined through discussion.ResultsOf the 565 studies identified, 13 met the inclusion criteria (<i>n</i> = 13). The mapping revealed that pharmacological interventions not only improved and prevented post-stroke apathy symptoms but also alleviated emotional blunting, reduced loss of motivation and interest, and enhanced social behavior and participation. Non-pharmacological interventions were associated with symptom relief and recovery over time. Furthermore, combined pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches contributed to improvements not only in post-stroke apathy but also in depression, language function, and behavioral aspects.ConclusionThe findings suggest that appropriate treatment for post-stroke apathy may lead to symptom relief, improvement, and prevention while enhancing language function, behavior, and social participation. Future research should focus on systematic reviews and meta-analyses to establish evidence-based recommendations for post-stroke apathy treatment strategies and their optimal combinations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1425-1437"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144999864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-31DOI: 10.1177/02692155251391669
Annick Van Gils, Yue Zou, Sarah Meyer, Marc Michielsen, Christophe Lafosse, Hilde Beyens, Fabienne Schillebeeckx, Daphne Kos, Geert Verheyden
ObjectiveTo characterize the trajectory and identify early predictors of bimanual performance at 6 and 12 months post-stroke.DesignProspective longitudinal study with assessments at admission, 6, and 12 months post-stroke.SettingInpatient rehabilitation centre.ParticipantsFirst-ever stroke survivors with unilateral upper limb motor impairment.Main MeasuresBimanual performance was assessed using the Adult Assisting Hand Assessment Stroke. Potential predictors were collected at admission through comprehensive clinical and functional assessments. We used multivariate linear regression to identify key predictors and a Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detection analysis to derive a clinical decision tree.ResultsNinety-two participants (mean age 67 ± 12 years; 22 ± 8 days post-stroke) participated. Bimanual performance improved over time (p < 0.001), with median scores increasing from 8 (interquartile range 0-52) at admission to 48 (8-70) at 6 months, and 48 (8-75) at 12 months. At 6 months, admission grasp function and stroke severity (64% and 9%) jointly explained 73% of the variance in bimanual performance scores. At 12 months, admission stroke severity, grasp function, and Barthel Index (66%, 10%, and 2%) accounted for 78% of the variance. Decision tree analysis confirmed stroke severity and grasp function as the primary predictors and generated a clinically interpretable model.ConclusionBimanual performance improves most within the first 6 months post-stroke. Grasp function and stroke severity at admission strongly predict long-term bimanual outcomes. The decision tree derived from the Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detection analysis may support stratified rehabilitation and realistic goal-setting for daily bimanual use.
{"title":"Tracking bimanual recovery after stroke: Grasp function and stroke severity predict 1-year performance.","authors":"Annick Van Gils, Yue Zou, Sarah Meyer, Marc Michielsen, Christophe Lafosse, Hilde Beyens, Fabienne Schillebeeckx, Daphne Kos, Geert Verheyden","doi":"10.1177/02692155251391669","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251391669","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo characterize the trajectory and identify early predictors of bimanual performance at 6 and 12 months post-stroke.DesignProspective longitudinal study with assessments at admission, 6, and 12 months post-stroke.SettingInpatient rehabilitation centre.ParticipantsFirst-ever stroke survivors with unilateral upper limb motor impairment.Main MeasuresBimanual performance was assessed using the Adult Assisting Hand Assessment Stroke. Potential predictors were collected at admission through comprehensive clinical and functional assessments. We used multivariate linear regression to identify key predictors and a Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detection analysis to derive a clinical decision tree.ResultsNinety-two participants (mean age 67 ± 12 years; 22 ± 8 days post-stroke) participated. Bimanual performance improved over time (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with median scores increasing from 8 (interquartile range 0-52) at admission to 48 (8-70) at 6 months, and 48 (8-75) at 12 months. At 6 months, admission grasp function and stroke severity (64% and 9%) jointly explained 73% of the variance in bimanual performance scores. At 12 months, admission stroke severity, grasp function, and Barthel Index (66%, 10%, and 2%) accounted for 78% of the variance. Decision tree analysis confirmed stroke severity and grasp function as the primary predictors and generated a clinically interpretable model.ConclusionBimanual performance improves most within the first 6 months post-stroke. Grasp function and stroke severity at admission strongly predict long-term bimanual outcomes. The decision tree derived from the Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detection analysis may support stratified rehabilitation and realistic goal-setting for daily bimanual use.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155251391669"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145421313","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-08-06DOI: 10.1177/02692155251363439
Amanda Strawson, Jill J Francis, Fran Brander, Kate Kelly, Mark Haddad, Nick S Ward
ObjectiveTo evaluate changes in quality-of-life and explore psychosocial influences on social participation and recovery in chronic stroke survivors following intensive upper limb neurorehabilitation.DesignMixed-methods design with quantitative (pre-post design with follow-up) and qualitative (semi-structured interview) phases.SettingThree-week Queen Square upper limb neurorehabilitation programme.Participants65 stroke survivors who participated in the programme from July 2016 to March 2018.Main measuresStroke Impact Scale (3.0) (SIS) and Action Research Arm Test, collected on admission, discharge, 6-week and 6-month follow-up (n = 65). Beliefs and psychosocial factors influencing quality-of-life were investigated through thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews in two subgroups, based whether the SIS-participation domain change from admission to follow-up was high (> 20, n = 5) or low (<-24, n = 5).ResultsSeven out of eight SIS domains, overall self-rated recovery (p < 0.001) and Action Research Arm Test (p < 0.001) improved from admission to discharge. The emotion domain improved from admission to discharge (p < 0.001) and reduced from discharge to 6-month follow-up (p < 0.001). Interviews highlighted four key psychosocial themes with contrasting positive and negative perspectives between higher change and lower change groups; themes 'hidden negative effects' and 'loneliness' were evident in the lower change group and 'getting on with my life' in the higher change group.ConclusionThe Queen Square upper limb neurorehabilitation programme led to measurable therapeutic benefits on physical and non-physical quality-of-life outcomes. However, the lack of sustained improvement in self-reported emotion contrasts with the clear benefits in other domains. This indicates a need for ongoing psychosocial support for some stroke survivors, supported by the qualitative findings.
目的评价慢性脑卒中患者上肢神经强化康复后生活质量的变化,探讨社会心理对患者社会参与和康复的影响。设计混合方法设计,包括定量(前后设计和后续)和定性(半结构化访谈)阶段。三周皇后广场上肢神经康复计划。参与者:2016年7月至2018年3月期间参加该项目的65名中风幸存者。主要测量方法:脑卒中影响量表(SIS)(3.0)和行动研究臂测试,于入院、出院、随访6周和6个月时采集(n = 65)。基于从入院到随访的sis参与域变化是高(bbb20, n = 5)还是低(p p p p),通过半结构化访谈的主题分析,对影响生活质量的信念和心理社会因素进行了调查
{"title":"Investigating changes in quality-of-life after high-dose high-intensity upper limb rehabilitation in chronic stroke survivors: A mixed-methods analysis of the Queen Square Programme.","authors":"Amanda Strawson, Jill J Francis, Fran Brander, Kate Kelly, Mark Haddad, Nick S Ward","doi":"10.1177/02692155251363439","DOIUrl":"10.1177/02692155251363439","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate changes in quality-of-life and explore psychosocial influences on social participation and recovery in chronic stroke survivors following intensive upper limb neurorehabilitation.DesignMixed-methods design with quantitative (pre-post design with follow-up) and qualitative (semi-structured interview) phases.SettingThree-week Queen Square upper limb neurorehabilitation programme.Participants65 stroke survivors who participated in the programme from July 2016 to March 2018.Main measuresStroke Impact Scale (3.0) (SIS) and Action Research Arm Test, collected on admission, discharge, 6-week and 6-month follow-up (n = 65). Beliefs and psychosocial factors influencing quality-of-life were investigated through thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews in two subgroups, based whether the SIS-participation domain change from admission to follow-up was high (> 20, n = 5) or low (<-24, n = 5).ResultsSeven out of eight SIS domains, overall self-rated recovery (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and Action Research Arm Test (<i>p</i> < 0.001) improved from admission to discharge. The emotion domain improved from admission to discharge (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and reduced from discharge to 6-month follow-up (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Interviews highlighted four key psychosocial themes with contrasting positive and negative perspectives between higher change and lower change groups; themes 'hidden negative effects' and 'loneliness' were evident in the lower change group and 'getting on with my life' in the higher change group.ConclusionThe Queen Square upper limb neurorehabilitation programme led to measurable therapeutic benefits on physical and non-physical quality-of-life outcomes. However, the lack of sustained improvement in self-reported emotion contrasts with the clear benefits in other domains. This indicates a need for ongoing psychosocial support for some stroke survivors, supported by the qualitative findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1324-1339"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144793635","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-08-25DOI: 10.1177/02692155251371429
Annie Tapp, David Griswold, Jennifer Bent, Susan Linder
ObjectiveTo identify common barriers and facilitators among physical therapists to implementing high-intensity gait training for patients post-stroke during inpatient rehabilitation.DesignA three-round Delphi study using free text responses and five-point Likert scales for agreement.Participants60 physical therapists with expertise treating patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation were invited. 33 participants completed all three rounds of surveys.Main MeasuresRound 1 consisted of two free text questions. Qualitative responses from round one were coded using the Theoretical Domains Framework and used to generate Likert scale survey items for rounds two and three. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥75% agreement. Response stability was evaluated with the Wilcoxon rank sum test.ResultsAnalysis identified 24 themes (12 facilitators, 12 barriers). Seven facilitators reached consensus: access to equipment (84.9%), built environment (78.8%), administrative support (78.8%), peer support (75.8%), team commitment to evidence-based practice (75.8%), high-intensity gait training-specific training (75.8%), and observable patient improvement (75.8%). Only one barrier reached consensus: treatment time interruptions (97.9%), including delays from toileting, hygiene, and medication administration. Other themes ranged from 18.2% to 57.6% agreement. No significant change in responses was found between rounds (p > 0.05).ConclusionsMore facilitators than barriers reached consensus, with treatment time interruptions as the primary agreed-upon barrier. Despite knowledge of high-intensity gait training and supportive factors, fewer than half of participants reported daily use. Targeted implementation strategies addressing time and workflow disruptions are needed to increase high-intensity gait training adoption in inpatient rehabilitation.
{"title":"Perceived barriers and facilitators to high-intensity gait training in stroke rehabilitation: A Delphi study.","authors":"Annie Tapp, David Griswold, Jennifer Bent, Susan Linder","doi":"10.1177/02692155251371429","DOIUrl":"10.1177/02692155251371429","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo identify common barriers and facilitators among physical therapists to implementing high-intensity gait training for patients post-stroke during inpatient rehabilitation.DesignA three-round Delphi study using free text responses and five-point Likert scales for agreement.Participants60 physical therapists with expertise treating patients with stroke in inpatient rehabilitation were invited. 33 participants completed all three rounds of surveys.Main MeasuresRound 1 consisted of two free text questions. Qualitative responses from round one were coded using the Theoretical Domains Framework and used to generate Likert scale survey items for rounds two and three. Consensus was defined a priori as ≥75% agreement. Response stability was evaluated with the Wilcoxon rank sum test.ResultsAnalysis identified 24 themes (12 facilitators, 12 barriers). Seven facilitators reached consensus: access to equipment (84.9%), built environment (78.8%), administrative support (78.8%), peer support (75.8%), team commitment to evidence-based practice (75.8%), high-intensity gait training-specific training (75.8%), and observable patient improvement (75.8%). Only one barrier reached consensus: treatment time interruptions (97.9%), including delays from toileting, hygiene, and medication administration. Other themes ranged from 18.2% to 57.6% agreement. No significant change in responses was found between rounds (p > 0.05).ConclusionsMore facilitators than barriers reached consensus, with treatment time interruptions as the primary agreed-upon barrier. Despite knowledge of high-intensity gait training and supportive factors, fewer than half of participants reported daily use. Targeted implementation strategies addressing time and workflow disruptions are needed to increase high-intensity gait training adoption in inpatient rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1390-1401"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144945133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-07-31DOI: 10.1177/02692155251363417
Jonathan Zavala-Gonzalez, Gustavo López-Alarcón, Diego Martinez, Sergio Jara, Igor Cigarroa, Héctor Gutiérrez-Espinoza
ObjectiveCompare the effectiveness of integrating virtual reality systems, Nintendo Wii and Microsoft Kinect, integrated with conventional physiotherapy versus conventional physiotherapy alone, in improving lower limb physical function in people over 60 years of age undergoing total hip arthroplasty.DesignRandomised, single-blind clinical trial.SettingSan Borja Arriaran Clinical Hospital, Santiago, Chile.Participants111 individuals over 60 years of age, divided into three groups (n = 37 each).InterventionsFor six weeks, the control group received conventional physiotherapy. The Wii and Kinect groups received the same physiotherapy programme plus 15 min of exercise using virtual reality platforms.Outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the function subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Secondary outcomes included WOMAC pain, Berg Balance Scale, Six-Minute Walk Test, and weight-bearing.ResultsAll groups improved. For WOMAC function, the Wii group surpassed the Kinect group (mean difference: 40.48 points; p < 0.001; minimum clinically important difference MCID: 11.9 points) but not the control group. The Wii group also led in balance (Berg Balance Scale mean difference: 19.41 points; p < 0.001; MCID: 11.5 points). The Kinect group was superior in the Six-Minute Walk Test (mean difference: 133.10 metres; p = 0.001) and WOMAC pain reduction (mean difference: 11.45 points; p < 0.003) exceeding the MCID of 2.2 points. No significant changes were observed in weight-bearing.ConclusionVirtual reality combined with physiotherapy improves clinically meaningful outcomes following hip arthroplasty. The Wii favours balance, while Kinect enhances pain and gait, supporting personalised rehabilitation.Trial registrationThis research was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry of Australia and New Zealand (ACTRN12618001252202).
目的比较虚拟现实系统、任天堂Wii和微软Kinect与常规物理治疗相结合对60岁以上全髋关节置换术患者下肢功能改善的效果。随机、单盲临床试验。背景:智利圣地亚哥san Borja Arriaran临床医院。参与者111名60岁以上的人,分为三组(每组37人)。干预措施对照组接受常规物理治疗6周。Wii组和Kinect组接受了相同的物理治疗计划,外加15分钟的虚拟现实平台锻炼。主要终点是安大略省西部和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)的功能量表。次要结果包括WOMAC疼痛、Berg平衡量表、6分钟步行测试和负重。结果各组均有改善。在WOMAC功能上,Wii组优于Kinect组(平均差40.48分;p p p = 0.001)和WOMAC疼痛减轻(平均差值:11.45分;p
{"title":"Virtual reality for total hip arthroplasty rehabilitation: Kinect versus Nintendo Wii, a single-blind randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Jonathan Zavala-Gonzalez, Gustavo López-Alarcón, Diego Martinez, Sergio Jara, Igor Cigarroa, Héctor Gutiérrez-Espinoza","doi":"10.1177/02692155251363417","DOIUrl":"10.1177/02692155251363417","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveCompare the effectiveness of integrating virtual reality systems, Nintendo Wii and Microsoft Kinect, integrated with conventional physiotherapy versus conventional physiotherapy alone, in improving lower limb physical function in people over 60 years of age undergoing total hip arthroplasty.DesignRandomised, single-blind clinical trial.SettingSan Borja Arriaran Clinical Hospital, Santiago, Chile.Participants111 individuals over 60 years of age, divided into three groups (n = 37 each).InterventionsFor six weeks, the control group received conventional physiotherapy. The Wii and Kinect groups received the same physiotherapy programme plus 15 min of exercise using virtual reality platforms.Outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the function subscale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Secondary outcomes included WOMAC pain, Berg Balance Scale, Six-Minute Walk Test, and weight-bearing.ResultsAll groups improved. For WOMAC function, the Wii group surpassed the Kinect group (mean difference: 40.48 points; <i>p</i> < 0.001; minimum clinically important difference MCID: 11.9 points) but not the control group. The Wii group also led in balance (Berg Balance Scale mean difference: 19.41 points; <i>p</i> < 0.001; MCID: 11.5 points). The Kinect group was superior in the Six-Minute Walk Test (mean difference: 133.10 metres; <i>p</i> = 0.001) and WOMAC pain reduction (mean difference: 11.45 points; <i>p</i> < 0.003) exceeding the MCID of 2.2 points. No significant changes were observed in weight-bearing.ConclusionVirtual reality combined with physiotherapy improves clinically meaningful outcomes following hip arthroplasty. The Wii favours balance, while Kinect enhances pain and gait, supporting personalised rehabilitation.Trial registrationThis research was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry of Australia and New Zealand (ACTRN12618001252202).</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1311-1323"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144752616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-08-08DOI: 10.1177/02692155251365193
Sergio Núñez de Arenas-Arroyo, Dimitris Mavridis, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno, Ana Torres-Costoso, Sara Reina-Gutiérrez, Eva Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Iván Cavero-Redondo, Irene Sequí-Domínguez
ObjectivesTo estimate the comparative efficacy of rehabilitation interventions for pain reduction in cervical radiculopathy and evaluate the individual components of combined treatments to support clinical decision-making.Data sourcesA systematic search was conducted across the Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, WOS, and PEDro databases up to 1 July 2025, for randomized controlled trials comparing rehabilitation interventions against no intervention or other rehabilitation approaches for cervical radiculopathy-related pain.Review methodsWe conducted a frequentist random effects network meta-analysis and a component network meta-analysis to isolate the effects of individual treatment components. We used CINeMA software to assess the confidence in our estimates.ResultsWe included 36 trials comparing 25 interventions composed by eight active components. The components associated with a decrease in pain were neurodynamic techniques (SMD = -1.45; 95%CI: -1.88 to -1.02), cervical traction(SMD = -0.66; 95%CI: -1.08 to -0.25), articular treatment (SMD = -0.72; 95%CI:-1.29 to -0.15), and dry needling(SMD = -3.40; 95%CI: -5.40 to -1.39). The most promising interventions for reducing pain in cervical radiculopathy patients were a combination of the above components (except dry needling) with analgesic electrotherapy and strengthening exercises with a moderate confidence rating.ConclusionsA combination of articular treatment, analgesic electrotherapy neurodynamic techniques strengthening exercises and cervical traction appears to offer the most effective pain relief for patients with cervical radiculopathy, with a moderate confidence rating. Individually, neurodynamic techniques, cervical traction, and articular treatment were the components associated with a significant reduction in pain. Although dry needling showed encouraging results, its limited presence in the network prevents drawing firm conclusions about its effectiveness.
{"title":"What components and formats of rehabilitation interventions are more effective to reduce pain in patients with cervical radiculopathy? A Systematic review and component network meta-analysis.","authors":"Sergio Núñez de Arenas-Arroyo, Dimitris Mavridis, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno, Ana Torres-Costoso, Sara Reina-Gutiérrez, Eva Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Iván Cavero-Redondo, Irene Sequí-Domínguez","doi":"10.1177/02692155251365193","DOIUrl":"10.1177/02692155251365193","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesTo estimate the comparative efficacy of rehabilitation interventions for pain reduction in cervical radiculopathy and evaluate the individual components of combined treatments to support clinical decision-making.Data sourcesA systematic search was conducted across the Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, WOS, and PEDro databases up to 1 July 2025, for randomized controlled trials comparing rehabilitation interventions against no intervention or other rehabilitation approaches for cervical radiculopathy-related pain.Review methodsWe conducted a frequentist random effects network meta-analysis and a component network meta-analysis to isolate the effects of individual treatment components. We used CINeMA software to assess the confidence in our estimates.ResultsWe included 36 trials comparing 25 interventions composed by eight active components. The components associated with a decrease in pain were neurodynamic techniques (SMD = -1.45; 95%CI: -1.88 to -1.02), cervical traction(SMD = -0.66; 95%CI: -1.08 to -0.25), articular treatment (SMD = -0.72; 95%CI:-1.29 to -0.15), and dry needling(SMD = -3.40; 95%CI: -5.40 to -1.39). The most promising interventions for reducing pain in cervical radiculopathy patients were a combination of the above components (except dry needling) with analgesic electrotherapy and strengthening exercises with a moderate confidence rating.ConclusionsA combination of articular treatment, analgesic electrotherapy neurodynamic techniques strengthening exercises and cervical traction appears to offer the most effective pain relief for patients with cervical radiculopathy, with a moderate confidence rating. Individually, neurodynamic techniques, cervical traction, and articular treatment were the components associated with a significant reduction in pain. Although dry needling showed encouraging results, its limited presence in the network prevents drawing firm conclusions about its effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1296-1310"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144798362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-07-31DOI: 10.1177/02692155251362999
Beatriz Hernández-Méndez, Àlex Ginés-Puertas, Javier Jerez-Roig, Joan-Daniel Martí-Romeu, David Cámara-Menoyo, Jordi Cuartero-Archs, Mercedes Piqueras-Céspedes, María Llaberia-Marcual, Esperanza Zuriguel-Pérez
ObjectiveThe aim was to adapt and validate the Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire of 109 items in four dimensions, for its application in physiotherapists in Spain.DesignDescriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter psychometric study carried out in two phases: phase 1, adaptation of the Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire to the physiotherapy setting and analysis of its content validity; phase 2, evaluation of the psychometric properties of the new instrument.SettingPhysiotherapists from a variety of work environments (public and private hospitals, geriatric institutions, home care services, clinics, and primary care, social health, educational and sports centers).ParticipantsA sample of 235 physiotherapists participated, of whom 108 completed the questionnaire for a second time after a two-week interval.Main measuresConstruct validity was analyzed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis, convergent validity and discriminant validity; reliability was analyzed using internal consistency and temporal stability (test-retest method).ResultsThe Average Scale Content Validity Index of 0.96 indicated high content validity. Confirmatory Factor Analysis confirmed the four-dimensional structure on which the original questionnaire is based, with acceptable model fit indices. Cronbach's alpha for the total questionnaire was 0.97, reaching values above 0.70 in each of the dimensions. Lin's Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was 0.71.ConclusionsThe Physiotherapy Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire showed appropriate psychometric properties. Its use among Spanish physiotherapists is recommended.ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT05059483.URLhttps://clinicaltrials.gov.
{"title":"Psychometric evaluation of the Spanish version of the physiotherapy critical thinking in clinical practice questionnaire.","authors":"Beatriz Hernández-Méndez, Àlex Ginés-Puertas, Javier Jerez-Roig, Joan-Daniel Martí-Romeu, David Cámara-Menoyo, Jordi Cuartero-Archs, Mercedes Piqueras-Céspedes, María Llaberia-Marcual, Esperanza Zuriguel-Pérez","doi":"10.1177/02692155251362999","DOIUrl":"10.1177/02692155251362999","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThe aim was to adapt and validate the Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire of 109 items in four dimensions, for its application in physiotherapists in Spain.DesignDescriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter psychometric study carried out in two phases: phase 1, adaptation of the Nursing Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire to the physiotherapy setting and analysis of its content validity; phase 2, evaluation of the psychometric properties of the new instrument.SettingPhysiotherapists from a variety of work environments (public and private hospitals, geriatric institutions, home care services, clinics, and primary care, social health, educational and sports centers).ParticipantsA sample of 235 physiotherapists participated, of whom 108 completed the questionnaire for a second time after a two-week interval.Main measuresConstruct validity was analyzed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis, convergent validity and discriminant validity; reliability was analyzed using internal consistency and temporal stability (test-retest method).ResultsThe Average Scale Content Validity Index of 0.96 indicated high content validity. Confirmatory Factor Analysis confirmed the four-dimensional structure on which the original questionnaire is based, with acceptable model fit indices. Cronbach's alpha for the total questionnaire was 0.97, reaching values above 0.70 in each of the dimensions. Lin's Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was 0.71.ConclusionsThe Physiotherapy Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice Questionnaire showed appropriate psychometric properties. Its use among Spanish physiotherapists is recommended.ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT05059483.URLhttps://clinicaltrials.gov.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1355-1365"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144752615","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}