Clinical Spine Surgery最新文献

Study design: Narrative review.

Objective: To provide an updated overview of pediatric cervical spine trauma.

Summary of background data: Pediatric cervical spine trauma can cause debilitating morbidity and mortality and neurological impairment. The unique anatomic features of the developing cervical spine can predispose children to injuries.

Methods: We reviewed the pediatric cervical spine trauma literature in PubMed and EMBASE.

Results: Pediatric cervical spine injury occurs in 1%-2% of pediatric trauma. The most frequent cause is motor vehicle collisions, with sports-related injuries being more common in older children. Larger head-to-body ratios and tissue elasticity can predispose young children to a greater risk of injury higher in the craniocervical junction and cervical spine. Standardized protocols and classification systems, such as the Pediatric Cervical Spine Clearance Working Group protocol and the AO Spine Injury and Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classifications, are valuable in triage as well as for assessing the need for operative versus nonoperative management. In general, operative approaches and principles are similar to those in adults, with modern instrumentation and fusion techniques achieving high rates of successful arthrodesis.

Conclusions: Effective management and treatment of pediatric cervical spine injuries depends on early and accurate diagnosis, a thorough understanding of pediatric spinal anatomy, and a versatile surgical armamentarium.

Study design: Retrospective database study.

Objective: This study aims to quantify and compare mean work RVUs (wRVUs), mean operative time (OpTime), and wRVUs/min in single- and multilevel anterior and posterior cervical spine fusions performed between 2011 and 2020.

Summary of background data: Prior research has demonstrated inconsistencies in technical skill, operative time, and surgical difficulty with reimbursement in various orthopedic subspecialties. Although trends investigating physician effort and reimbursement have been investigated in lumbar spine surgery, less research has examined these relationships with respect to cervical spine procedures.

Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) was queried for Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes reflecting anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF), and the number of levels involved. The cohort was stratified into 10 groups: single-level, 2-level, 3-level, 4-level, 5+ level anterior or posterior cervical fusions. Mean operative times, mean wRVUs, and wRVU/min were calculated and compared by Student t test.

Results: A total of 100,997 patients met inclusion criteria in this study, of which 79,141 (78.36%) underwent ACDF, whereas 21,836 (21.62%) underwent PCDF. One- and 2-level fusions were most common in both ACDF and PCDF. In 1-, 3-, 4-, and 5+ level fusion, the anterior approach demonstrated significantly lower mean wRVU (P<0.001). In 1-, 2-, and 3-level fusions, the anterior approach had significantly lower operation times (P<0.001). The anterior approach demonstrated significantly higher wRVU/min in 1- and 2- levels (P<0.001) but lower wRVU/min in 3- and 4-level fusions (P<0.001).

Conclusions: Clear discrepancies exist between surgical approach and levels of fusion in cervical spine procedures incongruous with markers of surgical difficulty, physician effort, or expertise required. These specific results suggest that the complexity of multi-level anterior cervical fusions are not effectively accounted for by existing RVU measures.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to determine the utility of advanced imaging to confirm the placement of robotic pedicle screws.

Summary of background data: With increasing robotic adoption, certain institutions and surgeons have developed protocols for obtaining 3D intraoperative imaging after robotic pedicle screw placement to ensure proper hardware placement. No studies have assessed the utility of these protocols relative to the potential risks of increased radiation exposure and operative time. The purpose of this study is to determine if we should be obtaining advanced imaging to confirm the placement of robotic pedicle screws.

Methods: This is a single institution retrospective cohort study of patients from May 2022 to July 2023 who underwent lumbar spinal fusion by a high-volume orthopedic spine surgeon at a level 1 metropolitan hospital. All cases used combined robotics and navigation systems for pedicle screw placement and intraoperative 3D imaging for evaluation of screw position. Pedicle screw accuracy was assessed using the Gertzbein and Robbins system (GRS). Acceptable pedicle screw position was defined as GRS A or B.

Results: Seventy patients with 354 robotically placed pedicle screws were assessed with intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy. All pedicle screws were placed in either a GRS type A or type B position. Three hundred fifty-one were placed in a GRS A classification (99.2%, 351/354), and 3 were placed in a GRS B classification (0.08% 3/354). No patients had screw-related complications. The average radiation dosage of 3D imaging was 289.7±164.6 mGy.

Conclusion: The robotic system places pedicle screws accurately without 3D intraoperative imaging. Given the increased radiation and operative time associated with 3D imaging protocols 3D imaging scans should only be obtained in cases with heightened clinical concern.

Level of evidence: Level IV.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate recent trends in the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the United States, (2) assess regional variations in the use of IONM, and (3) assess the association between IONM and clinical outcomes.

Summary of background data: IONM is frequently used during anterior cervical procedures to mitigate the risk of neurological injury. Prior studies have demonstrated decreasing utilization of IONM in ACDFs. However, no recent studies have re-assessed these trends.

Methods: Cases of cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy that underwent ACDF from 2011 to 2021 were identified through the PearlDiver Patient Record Database. Rates of IONM were compared based on patient age, gender, income, and region. Complications, 30-day readmissions, and reimbursement rates were also assessed.

Results: We identified 285,939 patients undergoing isolated ACDF, with 45,943 (16.1%) of these cases using IONM. There was a significant increase in the use of IONM for ACDFs over the study period (R2=0.87, P<0.001). Significant regional variability was observed in the utility of IONM (Northeast; 21.2%, Midwest; 16.3%, South; 14.7%, West; 14.2%; P<0.001). Younger age and higher patient income were associated with increased utility of IONM (P<0.001). IONM was associated with significantly higher costs but no reduction in rates of postoperative neurological complications (P<0.001 and 0.29, respectively).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates a significant increase in IONM utilization during ACDFs over the past decade. Considerable differences exist in IONM use concerning patient demographics, income, and geographic region, with the highest utilization in the Northeast. Notably, despite the association of IONM with over a 20% increase in reimbursement rates, its implementation was not associated with a reduction in rates of neurological complications.

Study design: Retrospective review.

Objective: To use opportunistic computed tomography (CT) screening to determine the prevalence of osteoporosis (OP) in patients presenting with spinal fractures and the rate of identification and treatment at our institution.

Background: OP remains a highly underdiagnosed and undertreated disease. Opportunistic abdominopelvic CT scans offer a feasible, accessible, and cost-effective screening tool for OP.

Methods: Retrospective review of 519 patients presenting as trauma activation to the emergency department of a Level 1 Trauma Center after a spinal fracture. Patients were excluded if under the age of 18 or lacking a CT scan upon arrival in the emergency department. Hounsfield Units (HU) were measured at the L1 vertebral level on CT scans to determine bone density levels. Values of ≤100 HU were considered osteoporotic, whereas 101-150 HU were osteopenic.

Results: A total of 424 patients were included. The average HU was 204.8 ± 74.3 HU. Of the patients, 16.7% were diagnosed as osteopenic and 9.9% as osteoporotic. The mean age was 65 ± 14 years for osteopenic patients and 77 ± 11 years for osteoporotic. A statistically significant inverse relationship was found between age and bone density. Of the patients, 42.5% with low bone density HU measurements had a previously documented history of OP/osteopenia. There was a statistically significant association between females and low bone density. Patients injured in a fall were statistically significantly more likely to have lower bone densities than those in motor vehicle accidents. Of the osteoporotic patients, 9.5% were treated by our institution's fragility fracture team.

Conclusions: Our study shows that among a cohort of patients with spinal fractures, 58% of patients with radiographic signs of OP are currently undiagnosed, resulting in a low treatment rate of OP. Increasing and standardizing the use of opportunistic CT scans would allow an increase in the diagnosis and treatment of OP in patients with spinal fractures. Further, opportunistic CT scans could also be useful for a broader orthopedic population at high risk of fragility fractures.

Level of evidence: Level II-therapeutic.

Study design: Case series.

Objective: Endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy gains attention for cervical radiculopathy due to its feasibility, better outcomes, and lower complications than traditional approaches, enabling efficient multilevel decompression in a single operation while avoiding anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion-related issues. However, with multilevel decompression, the remnant lamina becomes thin and fragile. We propose craniolateral inclinatory foraminotomy to minimize bone removal during laminotomy, reducing the risk of iatrogenic or postoperative lamina fractures in tandem decompression.

Materials and methods: From 2021 to 2022, 8 consecutive patients underwent the procedure and were followed up for at least 6 months. The VAS, NDI, and MacNab scores were recorded for clinical recovery and patient satisfaction evaluations. Preoperative and postoperative CT scans were utilized to measure the lamina preservation percentage at each level.

Results: The clinical outcomes improved significantly in every patient. No postoperative neck pain, segmental instability, or lamina fracture were observed. The mean lamina preservation percentages of C5, C6, C7, and all vertebrae were 68.8%, 73.22%, 71.86%, and 72.18%, respectively.

Conclusions: Ongoing technical adjustments will accompany endoscopic technique development to decrease complications and enhance benefits. Our reported technique avoids extensive laminotomy in multilevel tandem decompression, aiming to prevent lamina fractures and anticipate a reduction in postoperative neck pain.

Level of evidence: Level IV.

Study design: Single-institution retrospective review.

Objective: To establish baseline ranges and variability of 7 radiographic measurements of the cervical spine in a healthy patient population as potential diagnostic tools for craniocervical instability.

Summary of background data: Craniocervical instability, common in patients with connective tissue disease such as Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, often presents with a wide range of symptoms, including neck pain. Current diagnostic methods employ a range of clinical and radiographic features, but diagnostic challenges remain due to missed indications on static imaging and a lack of standardized measurement values and normalized variance.

Methods: Seventy-two healthy patients with cervical imaging were analyzed. Surgimap software was used to annotate supine computed tomography images, flexion, extension, and neutral x-ray images for measurement. These measurements included the atlanto-dental interval, clival-axial angle, basion-dens interval, basion-axis interval, perpendicular basion to the inferior aspect of C2, also known as Grabb Oakes measurement, and the hard palate to C1 and hard palate to C2. Statistical analysis assessed differences among imaging modalities, and coefficients of variation were calculated for each measurement.

Results: Our cohort consisted of a total of 72 patients with a mean age of 64 (SD: 13.54). All measurements except for the basion-axial interval and atlanto-dental interval demonstrated a significant difference between extension and flexion x-ray measurements. clivo-axial angle, hard palate to C1, and hard palate to C2 demonstrated the lowest coefficients of variance across imaging modalities.

Conclusion: Understanding normal variance in cervical measurements is invaluable for accurate CCI diagnosis. Using a cohort of healthy patients, this study delineates the distribution and spread of 7 cervical measurements, delineating reference values and variability in these key measurements and highlighting their potential for use as imaging markers for CCI.

Level of evidence: Level III.

Summary of background data: Although pseudoangina is most commonly caused by cervical disc herniation, several cases have been described where thoracic herniation produced symptoms of pseudoangina. If thoracic herniation can produce angina-like pain, then it is important to consider whether pathology of the thoracolumbar spine, in general, can trigger false pain syndromes distinct from pseudoangina.

Objective: We seek to provide the most comprehensive study regarding the diagnosis and treatment of spinal conditions causing false pain syndromes.

Study design: Systematic review of the current literature using PRISMA 2020 recommendations.

Methods: We queried the literature and systematically selected relevant studies according to PRISMA guidelines.

Results: Across 22 selected studies, the sample size was 30 patients, and a total of 26 met the criteria for statistical analysis. Seven (26.9%) of these patients presented with a chief complaint of pseudoangina resulting from thoracic disc herniation. 73.1% (19/26) of patients exhibited pain mimicking visceral origin. Overall, 13/19 (68.4%) patients exhibited thoracic spine disease only and 4/19 (21.1%) patients were affected at lumbar levels only, while 2 (10.5%) patients exhibited thoracolumbar herniation. Presentations included abdominal pain (11/19) mimicking appendicitis or pancreatitis, flank pain mimicking renal colic (8/19), and 2 cases of scrotal pain/orchalgia. Symptom durations ranged from acute (<24 h) to 7 years. Treatments were reported for 18/19 patients and all treated patients reported alleviated pain. Seven out of 18 patients were managed conservatively while 11/18 were treated surgically. Misdiagnosis resulted in unnecessary surgery (pancreaticojejunostomy) or other invasive procedures.

Conclusions: In spinal disorders manifesting with atypical pain syndromes, delay in proper diagnosis and unnecessary treatments can, unfortunately, cause prolonged patient suffering and increased cost of health care. As a result, some have proposed that spinal screening should be incorporated into clinical examinations involving false pain syndromes.

Study design: Retrospective cohort.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the relationship between the cervical levels fused and the degree of subsidence following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures.

Background: Subsidence following ACDF may worsen clinical outcomes. Previous studies have linked lower cervical levels with higher rates of subsidence, but none have quantified the relative degree of subsidence between levels.

Materials and methods: Patients who underwent ACDF from 2016 to 2021 at a tertiary medical center were included in this study. Lateral cervical radiographs from the immediate postoperative period and the final follow-ups were used to calculate subsidence. Analysis of variance was used to examine the association between cervical levels fused and subsidence. Multivariable linear regression analysis controlled for age, sex, smoking status, osteopenia/osteoporosis, number of fused levels, cage-to-body ratio, and cage type while examining the relationship between the cervical level fused and subsidence.

Results: This study includes 122 patients who underwent 227 levels fused. There were 16 (7.0%) C3-C4 fusions, 55 (24.2%) C4-C5 fusions, 97 (42.7%) C5-C6 fusions, and 59 (26.0%) C6-C7 fusions. There was a significant difference in the degree of anterior subsidence between cervical levels fused (P = 0.013) with a mean subsidence of 1.0 mm (SD: 1.6) for C3-C4, 1.1 mm (SD: 1.4) for C4-C5, 1.8 mm (SD: 1.5) for C5-C6, and 1.8 mm (SD: 1.6) for C6-C7 fusions. Relative to C6-C7 fusions, C4-C5 (P = 0.016), and C3-C4 (P = 0.014) fusions were associated with decreased anterior subsidence, whereas C5-C6 (P = 0.756) fusions were found to have similar degrees of anterior subsidence in the multivariable analysis.

Conclusion: We found upper cervical levels experienced a smaller degree of anterior subsidence than lower levels, after controlling for demographic and implant characteristics. Surgeons can consider using larger cages at lower cervical levels to minimize these risks.

Study design/setting: Single center retrospective cohort study.

Objective: We performed a retrospective study evaluating the incidence and degree of L4-5 anterior spondylolisthesis in patients with standard supine MRI, standing flexion-extension radiographs, and prone CT. We hypothesize that prone CT imaging will provide greater sensitivity for instability compared with conventional flexion extension or supine positions.

Summary of background data: Dynamic lumbar instability evaluated by flexion-extension radiographs may underestimate the degree of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Despite efforts to characterize dynamic instability, significant variability remains in current guidelines regarding the most appropriate imaging modalities to adequately evaluate instability.

Methods: We assessed single-level (L4-5) anterolisthesis between 2014 and 2022 with standing lateral conventional radiographs (CR), flexion-extension images, prone CT images (CT), or supine MRI images (MRI).

Results: We identified 102 patients with L4-5 anterolisthesis. The average translation (±SD) measured were 4.9±2.2 mm (CR), 2.5±2.6 mm (CT), and 3.7±2.6 mm (MRI) (P<0.001). The mean difference in anterolisthesis among imaging modalities was 2.7±1.8 mm between CR and CT (P<0.001), 1.8±1.4 mm between CR and MRI (P<0.001), and 1.6±1.4 mm between CT and MRI (P=0.252). Ninety-two of 102 patients (90.2%) showed greater anterolisthesis on CR compared with CT, 72 of 102 (70.6%) comparing CR to MRI, and 27 of 102 (26.5%) comparing CT to MRI. We found that 17.6% of patients exhibited ≥3 mm anterior translation comparing CR with MRI, whereas 38.2% of patients were identified comparing CR with CT imaging (χ2 test P=0.0009, post hoc Fisher exact test P=0.0006 between CR and CT). Only 5.9% of patients had comparable degrees of instability between flexion-standing.

Conclusions: Prone CT imaging revealed the greatest degree of single L4-5 segmental instability compared with flexion-extension radiographs.