Clinical Spine Surgery最新文献

Study design: A systematic review.

Objective: We characterized the rates of sociodemographic data and social determinants of health (SDOH) reported in spinal surgery randomized control trials (RCTs) and the association between these RCTs' characteristics and their rates of reporting on race, ethnicity, and SDOH variables.

Summary of background data: Although numerous institutions maintain guidelines and recommendations regarding the inclusion and reporting of sociodemographic and SDOH variables in RCTs, the proportion of studies that ultimately report such information is unclear, particularly in spine surgery.

Materials and methods: We searched the MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase databases for published results from spinal surgery RCTs from January 2002 through December 2022, and screened studies according to prespecified inclusion criteria regarding analysis and reporting of sociodemographic and SDOH variables.

Results: We analyzed 421 studies. Ninety-six studies (22.8%) reported race, ethnicity, or SDOH covariates. On multivariate analysis, study size [rate ratio (RR)=1.18; 95% CI, 1.06-1.32], public/institutional funding (RR=2.28; 95% CI, 1.29-4.04), and private funding (RR=3.27; 95% CI, 1.87-5.74) were significantly associated with reporting race, ethnicity, or SDOH variables. Study size (RR=1.26; 95% CI, 1.07-1.48) and North American region (RR=21.84; CI, 5.04-94.64) were associated with a higher probability of reporting race and/or ethnicity. Finally, study size (RR=1.27; 95% CI, 1.10-1.46), public/institutional funding (RR=2.68; 95% CI, 1.33-5.39), focus on rehabilitation/therapy intervention (RR=2.70; 95% CI, 1.40-5.21), and nonblinded study groups (RR=2.70; 95% CI, 1.40-5.21) were associated with significantly higher probability of reporting employment status.

Conclusion: Rates of reporting race, ethnicity, and SDOH variables were lower in the spinal surgery RCTs in our study than in RCTs in other medical disciplines. These reporting rates did not increase over a 20-year period. Trial characteristics significantly associated with higher rates of reporting were larger study size, North American region, private or public funding, and a focus on behavioral/rehabilitation interventions.

Level of evidence: Level III.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of pedicle screw trajectory planning based on artificial intelligence (AI) software in patients with different levels of bone mineral density (BMD).

Summary of background data: AI-based pedicle screw trajectory planning has potential to improve pullout force (POF) of screws. However, there is currently no literature investigating the efficacy of AI-based pedicle screw trajectory planning in patients with different levels of BMD.

Methods: The patients were divided into 5 groups (group A-E) according to their BMD. The AI software utilizes lumbar spine CT data to perform screw trajectory planning and simulate AO screw trajectories for bilateral L3-5 vertebral bodies. Both screw trajectories were subdivided into unicortical and bicortical modes. The AI software automatically calculating the POF and pullout risk of every screw trajectory. The POF and risk of screw pullout for AI-planned screw trajectories and AO standard trajectories were compared and analyzed.

Results: Forty-three patients were included. For the screw sizes, AI-planned screws were greater in diameter and length than those of AO screws (P<0.05). In groups B-E, the AI unicortical trajectories had a POF of over 200N higher than that of AO unicortical trajectories. POF was higher in all groups for the AI bicortical screw trajectories compared with the AO bicortical screw trajectories (P<0.05). AI unicortical trajectories in groups B-E had a lower risk of screw pullout compared with that of AO unicortical trajectories (P<0.05).

Conclusions: AI unicortical screw trajectory planning for lumbar surgery in patients with BMD of 40-120 mg/cm3 can significantly improve screw POF and reduce the risk of screw pullout.

Study design: Retrospective study.

Objective: To determine whether there are significant differences in postoperative dysphagia when using table-mounted versus self-retaining retractor tools.

Summary of background data: Retraction of prevertebral structures during anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS) is commonly associated with postoperative dysphagia or dysphonia. Retractors commonly used include nonfixed self-retaining retraction devices or fixed table-mounted retractor arms. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding differences in dysphagia between retractor types.

Methods: Patients who underwent ACSS and adhered to a minimum of 6-month follow-up were retrospectively evaluated. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were compared between table-mounted and self-retaining retractor groups at the preoperative and final postoperative time points, including the SWAL-QOL survey for dysphagia. Categorical dysphagia was assessed using previously defined values for the minimum clinically important difference (MCID).

Results: Overall, 117 and 75 patients received self-retaining or table-mounted retraction. Average follow-up was significantly longer in the self-retaining cohort (14.8±15.0 mo) than in the table-mounted group (9.4±7.8, P=0.005). No differences were detected in swallowing function (P=0.918) or operative time (P=0.436), although 3-level procedures were significantly shortened with table-mounted retraction (P=0.005). Multivariate analysis trended toward worse swallow function with increased operative levels (P=0.072) and increased retraction time (P=0.054), although the retractor used did not predict swallowing function (P=0.759). However, categorical rates of postoperative dysphagia were lower with table-mounted retraction (13.3% vs. 27.4%, P=0.033).

Conclusions: There was no significant difference observed in long-term swallowing dysfunction between patients who underwent ACSS with self-retaining and table-mounted retractors, although the rate of dysphagia was lower with table-mounted retraction. In addition, the greater number of operated levels per case in the table-mounted group at a similar time suggests improved efficiency.

Study design: Retrospective single-center data analysis.

Objective: The aim of this investigation was to give advises for choosing the LIV in selective fusion to reach the best correction of the minor curve and sagittal profile.

Summary of background data: Scoliotic curves can be classified as structural or nonstructural. If selective fusion is performed, the nonstructural curves are not instrumented. The choice of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) and the impact of different levels of the LIV on the correction of the minor curve in the frontal profile and on the sagittal balance is under debate.

Methods: Forty-seven consecutive patients treated by posterior instrumented fusion were included in this retrospective investigation. Impact of the level of the LIV with regard to distance to end vertebra (EV), to the stable vertebra (StV), to the sagittal infliction point (IP), and to the apex of the lumbar lordosis on the correction of the minor curve was analyzed.

Results: Distance of LIV to EV was significant with regard to correction of the minor curve if it was more than 5 levels (P<0.001). Distance of LIV to StV was significant with regard to correction of the minor curve if it was more than 4 levels (P<0.01). Distance of LIV to IP was significant with regard to correction of the minor curve if it was more than 2 levels (P<0.01).

Conclusions: Choosing a LIV that was more than 2 levels higher or lower than the sagittal infliction point showed a significantly higher correction of the minor curve. We therefore recommend to keep that distance when LIV is chosen.

Study design: A retrospective cohort study.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between disruption of cartilage endplates and postoperative recurrence of lumber disk herniation (LDH) using preoperative T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI-T1WI).

Summary of background data: Recurrence of LDH is a relatively common complication after discectomy. Although several risk factors have been identified, their predictive capability remains limited. Previous histologic studies reported that cartilage endplates were present in 85% of patients with recurrent LDH.

Methods: Patients with a single level of LDH who underwent open or microendoscopic discectomy were retrospectively reviewed. On the basis of preoperative sagittal MRI-T1WI, cartilage endplates were divided into anterior and posterior portions at the center of the disk and evaluated for discontinuity. Patient background characteristics, spinopelvic sagittal parameters, degrees of disk degeneration, and recurrence level were also evaluated.

Results: A total of 100 patients were included in this study (mean age, 50.5 years old; 41% female). Symptomatic recurrence of LDH occurred in 15 patients (15%). There were no significant differences in patient background characteristics (age, 46.9 vs. 51.2 years old; %female, 60% vs. 38%; smoking, 33% vs. 41%; diabetes mellitus, 27% vs. 29%) or spinopelvic parameters (PI, 44.1 vs. 47.0 degrees; PT, 16.8 vs. 19.4 degrees; SS, 27.3 vs. 27.6 degrees; LL, 37.7 vs. 33.7 degrees). In the recurrence group, MRI-T1WI showed a higher rate of cartilage endplate disruption in the posterior portion than in the no-recurrence group (73% vs. 34%, P=0.01). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the disruption of the posterior cartilage endplate remained an independent predictor of recurrence.

Conclusions: Disruption in the posterior cartilage endplate on preoperative MRI-T1WI was closely associated with recurrence after LDH surgery. These results suggest that this MRI finding is a practical and useful predictor of LDH recurrence.

Level of evidence: Level III.

Study design: This is a retrospective cohort study utilizing machine learning to predict postoperative complications in cervical spine metastases surgery.

Objectives: The main objective is to develop a machine learning model that accurately predicts complications following cervical spine metastases surgery.

Summary of background data: Cervical spine metastases surgery can enhance quality of life but carries a risk of complications influenced by various factors. Existing scoring systems may not include all predictive factors. Machine learning offers the potential for a more accurate predictive model by analyzing a broader range of variables.

Methods: Data from January 2012 to December 2020 were retrospectively collected from medical databases. Predictive models were developed using Gradient Boosting, Logistic Regression, and Decision Tree Classifier algorithms. Variables included patient demographics, disease characteristics, and laboratory investigations. SMOTE was used to balance the dataset, and the models were assessed using AUC, F1-score, precision, recall, and SHAP values.

Results: The study included 72 patients, with a 29.17% postoperative complication rate. The Gradient Boosting model had the best performance with an AUC of 0.94, indicating excellent predictive capability. Albumin level, platelet count, and tumor histology were identified as top predictors of complications.

Conclusions: The Gradient Boosting machine learning model showed superior performance in predicting postoperative complications in cervical spine metastases surgery. With continuous data updating and model training, machine learning can become a vital tool in clinical decision-making, potentially improving patient outcomes.

Level of evidence: Level III.

Study design: Retrospective review.

Objective: We sought to characterize complications associated with anterior column release (ACR).

Summary of background data: Correction of positive sagittal imbalance was traditionally completed with anterior column grafts or posterior osteotomies. ACR is a minimally invasive technique for addressing sagittal plane deformity by restoring lumbar lordosis.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent ACR in a prospectively kept database at a tertiary care academic center from January 2012 to December 2018. The prespecified complications were hardware failure (rod fracture, hardware loosening, or screw fracture), proximal junctional kyphosis, ipsilateral thigh numbness, ipsilateral femoral nerve weakness, arterial injury requiring blood transfusion, bowel injury, and abdominal pseudohernia.

Results: Thirty-eight patients were identified. Thirty-five patients had ACR at L3-4, 1 had ACR at L4-5, and 1 patient had ACR at L2-3 and L3-4. Eighteen patients (47.4%) had one of the prespecified complications (10 patients had multiple). Ten patients developed hardware failure (26.3%); 8 patients (21.1%) had rod fracture, 4 (10.5%) had screw fracture, and 1 (2.6%) had screw loosening. At discharge, rates of ipsilateral thigh numbness (37.8%) and hip flexor (37.8%)/quadriceps weakness (29.7%) were the highest. At follow-up, 6 patients (16.2%) had ipsilateral anterolateral thigh numbness, 5 (13.5%) suffered from ipsilateral hip flexion weakness, and 3 patients (5.4%) from ipsilateral quadriceps weakness. Arterial injury occurred in 1 patient (2.7%). Abdominal pseudohernia occurred in 1 patient (2.7%). There were no bowel injuries observed.

Conclusions: ACR is associated with a higher than initially anticipated risk of neurological complications, hardware failure, and proximal junctional kyphosis.

Study design: Level 3 retrospective database study.

Objective: This study aims to compare work RVU (wRVU), practice expense RVU (peRVU), malpractice RVU (mpRVU), and inflation-adjusted facility price alongside MS-DRG relative weight length of stay (LOS) for cervical spine fusions between 2011 and 2023.

Summary of background data: Both RVU and MS-DRG reimbursement have been studied in various surgical subspecialties; however, little investigation has centered on cervical spine fusions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate trends in RVU and MS-DRG reimbursement in cervical spine fusion throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) physician fee schedule was queried between 2011 and 2023 for RVU and facility reimbursement using common single and multilevel anterior and posterior cervical fusion codes. RVU facility prices were inflation adjusted to 2023. MS-DRG reimbursement data from 2011 to 2022 were compiled for cervical spinal fusion procedures with major complication or comorbidity (MCC) 471, complication or comorbidity (CC) 472, and without CC/MCC 473. Compound annual growth rates (CAGRs), Mean Annual Change, and yearly percent changes were calculated.

Results: No changes in wRVU were seen for all cervical CPT codes; however, the CAGR of peRVU (-0.51%±0.60%) and mpRVU (0.69%±0.41%) demonstrated marginal fluctuations. Every CPT code displayed an inflation-adjusted facility price decrease (-2.18%±0.24%). When assessing MS-DRG, there were marginal changes in geometric mean LOS (0.17%±0.45%), arithmetic mean LOS (-0.15%±0.84%), and relative weight (1.09%±0.68%). Unlike RVU reimbursement, the yearly percent change differs between each MS-DRG code.

Conclusions: Inflation-adjusted RVU reimbursement facility prices demonstrated a consistent decrease, while DRG code reimbursement stayed relatively consistent over the study period. This data may help surgeons and hospitals become cognizant of temporal variations in reimbursement patterns as it may affect their personal practice.

Level of evidence: Level III retrospective study.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: This study aimed to assess whether prior bariatric surgery (BS) is associated with higher 10-year surgical complication and revision rates in lumbar spine fusion compared with the general population and morbidly obese patients.

Background: Obesity accelerates degenerative spine processes, often necessitating lumbar fusion for functional improvement. BS is explored for weight loss in lumbar spine cases, but its impact on fusion outcomes remains unclear. Existing literature on BS before lumbar fusion yields conflicting results, with a limited investigation into long-term spine complications.

Methods: Utilizing the PearlDiver database, we examined patients undergoing elective primary single-level lumbar fusion, categorizing them by prior BS. Propensity score matching created cohorts from (1) the general population without BS history and (2) morbidly obese patients without BS history. Using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard modeling, we compared 10-year cumulative incidence rates and hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause revision and specific revision indications.

Results: Patients who underwent BS exhibited a higher cumulative incidence and risk of decompressive laminectomy and irrigation & debridement (I&D) within 10 years postlumbar fusion compared with matched controls from the general population [decompressive laminectomy: HR = 1.32; I&D: HR = 1.35]. Compared with matched controls from a morbidly obese population, patients who underwent BS were associated with lower rates of adjacent segment disease (HR = 0.31) and I&D (HR = 0.64). However, the risk of all-cause revision within 10 years did not increase for patients who underwent BS compared with matched or unmatched controls from the general population or morbidly obese patients (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Prior BS did not elevate the 10-year all-cause revision risk in lumbar fusion compared with the general population or morbidly obese patients. However, patients who underwent BS were associated with a lower 10-year risk of I&D when compared with morbidly obese patients without BS. Our study indicates comparable long-term surgical complication rates between patients who underwent BS and these control groups, with an associated reduction in risk of infectious complications when compared with morbidly obese patients. Although BS may address medical comorbidities, its impact on long-term lumbar fusion revision outcomes is limited.

Study design: Cross-sectional study.

Objective: To evaluate for areas of consensus and divergence of opinion within the spine community regarding the management of cervical spondylotic conditions and acute traumatic central cord syndrome (ATCCS) and the influence of the patient's age, disease severity, and myelomalacia.

Summary of background data: There is ongoing disagreement regarding the indications for, and urgency of, operative intervention in patients with mild degenerative myelopathy, moderate to severe radiculopathy, isolated axial symptomatology with evidence of spinal cord compression, and ATCCS without myelomalacia.

Methods: A survey request was sent to 330 attendees of the Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS) 2021 Annual Meeting to assess practice patterns regarding the treatment of cervical stenosis, myelopathy, radiculopathy, and ATCCS in 16 unique clinical vignettes with associated MRIs. Operative versus nonoperative treatment consensus was defined by a management option selected by >80% of survey participants.

Results: Overall, 116 meeting attendees completed the survey. Consensus supported nonoperative management for elderly patients with axial neck pain and adults with axial neck pain without myelomalacia. Operative management was indicated for adult patients with mild myelopathy and myelomalacia, adult patients with severe radiculopathy, elderly patients with severe radiculopathy and myelomalacia, and elderly ATCCS patients with pre-existing myelopathic symptoms. Treatment discrepancy in favor of nonoperative management was found for adult patients with isolated axial symptomatology and myelomalacia. Treatment discrepancy favored operative management for elderly patients with mild myelopathy, adult patients with mild myelopathy without myelomalacia, elderly patients with severe radiculopathy without myelomalacia, and elderly ATCCS patients without preceding symptoms.

Conclusions: Although there is uncertainty regarding the treatment of mild myelopathy, operative intervention was favored for nonelderly patients with evidence of myelomalacia or radiculopathy and for elderly patients with ATCCS, especially if pre-injury myelopathic symptoms were present.

Level of evidence: Level V.