Asciminib is the first BCR::ABL1 inhibitor that Specifically Targets the ABL Myristoyl Pocket (STAMP) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. This phase 1, two-treatment-period, drug-drug interaction study evaluated the effect of steady-state asciminib on the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin. A single dose of atorvastatin (20 mg) was administered on day 1 (period 1: days 1-4). On days 5-11 (period 2: days 5-12), 80 mg asciminib was administered once daily, with a single dose of atorvastatin co-administered on day 9. Pharmacokinetic sampling for atorvastatin was performed on days 1-4 in period 1 and days 9-12 in period 2. Twenty-two healthy participants were enrolled. Twenty participants completed the study, and two discontinued due to adverse events (AEs). Asciminib increased the adjusted geometric mean (Gmean) of maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), the area under the curve (AUC) from zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUClast), and the AUC from zero to infinity (AUCinf) of atorvastatin by 24%, 16%, and 14%, respectively, and did not affect these parameters for its active metabolites, o-hydroxy-atorvastatin and p-hydroxy-atorvastatin. Plasma concentrations of coproporphyrin-1 (CP-1), an endogenous substrate of the atorvastatin transporter OATP1B, were not affected by asciminib. Thirteen participants reported at least one AE, all being grade 1/2, except for one grade 3 AE (increased alanine aminotransferase). No serious AEs were reported. In conclusion, concomitant administration of steady-state asciminib and atorvastatin resulted in a small, clinically irrelevant increase in atorvastatin exposure and no change in CP-1 concentrations. Both drugs were well tolerated. These data support co-administration of asciminib and atorvastatin.
{"title":"Assessment of Pharmacokinetic Drug Interaction of Asciminib with Atorvastatin in Healthy Participants","authors":"Matthias Hoch, Wendy Weis, Felix Huth, Seshulatha Jamalapuram, Michelle Quinlan, Amarnath Bandaru, Suleyman Eralp Bellibas, Asmae Mirkou, Shruti Kapoor, Shefali Kakar","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1611","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.1611","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Asciminib is the first BCR::ABL1 inhibitor that Specifically Targets the ABL Myristoyl Pocket (STAMP) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. This phase 1, two-treatment-period, drug-drug interaction study evaluated the effect of steady-state asciminib on the pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin. A single dose of atorvastatin (20 mg) was administered on day 1 (period 1: days 1-4). On days 5-11 (period 2: days 5-12), 80 mg asciminib was administered once daily, with a single dose of atorvastatin co-administered on day 9. Pharmacokinetic sampling for atorvastatin was performed on days 1-4 in period 1 and days 9-12 in period 2. Twenty-two healthy participants were enrolled. Twenty participants completed the study, and two discontinued due to adverse events (AEs). Asciminib increased the adjusted geometric mean (G<sub>mean</sub>) of maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>), the area under the curve (AUC) from zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC<sub>last</sub>), and the AUC from zero to infinity (AUC<sub>inf</sub>) of atorvastatin by 24%, 16%, and 14%, respectively, and did not affect these parameters for its active metabolites, <i>o</i>-hydroxy-atorvastatin and <i>p</i>-hydroxy-atorvastatin. Plasma concentrations of coproporphyrin-1 (CP-1), an endogenous substrate of the atorvastatin transporter OATP1B, were not affected by asciminib. Thirteen participants reported at least one AE, all being grade 1/2, except for one grade 3 AE (increased alanine aminotransferase). No serious AEs were reported. In conclusion, concomitant administration of steady-state asciminib and atorvastatin resulted in a small, clinically irrelevant increase in atorvastatin exposure and no change in CP-1 concentrations. Both drugs were well tolerated. These data support co-administration of asciminib and atorvastatin.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12856970/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145343948","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jace C. Nielsen, Masako Saito, Xuegong Wang, Megumi Iwai, Graeme L. Fraser, Steven Ramael, Jiayin Huang
Fezolinetant is a non-hormonal, selective neurokinin-3 receptor antagonist that blocks neurokinin B activation of kisspeptin/neurokinin B/dynorphin neurons to thereby modulate neuronal activity in the thermoregulatory center. Fezolinetant has been approved in many regions, including North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause at a dose of 45 mg once daily (QD). The risk of potential QT prolongation for fezolinetant was assessed prior to the initiation of the phase 3 trials. A concentration–QTc (C–QTc) analysis was performed in accordance with recommendations from ICH E14 Guideline and utilized data from a phase 1 single and multiple ascending dose study, which tested single doses up to 900 mg and multiple daily doses up to 720 mg in healthy male and female participants. The fezolinetant C–QTc relationship indicated no clinically relevant QT prolongation at therapeutic or supra-therapeutic doses of fezolinetant. Based on these modeling results as well as data from other clinical and non-clinical studies, no thorough QT/QTc (TQT) study was required for fezolinetant.
{"title":"Concentration–QTc Modeling to Support Clinical Development of Fezolinetant","authors":"Jace C. Nielsen, Masako Saito, Xuegong Wang, Megumi Iwai, Graeme L. Fraser, Steven Ramael, Jiayin Huang","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1613","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.1613","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fezolinetant is a non-hormonal, selective neurokinin-3 receptor antagonist that blocks neurokinin B activation of kisspeptin/neurokinin B/dynorphin neurons to thereby modulate neuronal activity in the thermoregulatory center. Fezolinetant has been approved in many regions, including North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause at a dose of 45 mg once daily (QD). The risk of potential QT prolongation for fezolinetant was assessed prior to the initiation of the phase 3 trials. A concentration–QTc (C–QTc) analysis was performed in accordance with recommendations from ICH E14 Guideline and utilized data from a phase 1 single and multiple ascending dose study, which tested single doses up to 900 mg and multiple daily doses up to 720 mg in healthy male and female participants. The fezolinetant C–QTc relationship indicated no clinically relevant QT prolongation at therapeutic or supra-therapeutic doses of fezolinetant. Based on these modeling results as well as data from other clinical and non-clinical studies, no thorough QT/QTc (TQT) study was required for fezolinetant.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.1613","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145318139","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vaishali Gupte, Sandesh Sawant, Senthilnathan Mohanasundaram, Rohit Malabade, Anup Warrier, M. N. Sivakumar, Yogendra Pal Singh, Pradeep Bhattacharya, Rajesh Chawla, Jaideep Gogtay
Multidrug–resistant Enterobacteriaceae are a primary cause of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) worldwide. This study compared pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of plazomicin among Indian versus non–India participants. This was a post hoc analysis of PK data from the Phase 2 study (ACHN–490-002), a multicenter, double–blind, randomized, comparator–controlled study. Eligible participants (aged 18-85 years, body weight ≤100 kg) with documented/suspected cUTI or acute pyelonephritis received either 10 or 15 mg/kg plazomicin. Among 91 participants, 70 were non–Indian and 21 were Indian. For the 15 mg/kg dose, plazomicin demonstrated a higher area under the plasma time–concentration curve from time 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24) and maximum concentration (Cmax) compared to the 10 mg/kg dose, which showed greater variability. At the 10 mg/kg dose, Indian participants had a mean AUC0-24 of 163.0 mg•h/L, while non–Indian participants had a mean AUC0-24 of 185.0 mg•h/L. The estimated mean plazomicin AUC0-24 values were comparable between Indian and non–Indian participants. The mean Cmax for Indian participants was 17.2 mg•h/L, and for non–Indian participants it was 15.7 mg•h/L. Dose–normalized AUC0-24 and Cmax point estimates were 110% and 103%, respectively. This showed comparable plazomicin exposure in Indian and non–Indian patients.
{"title":"Plazomicin Pharmacokinetics in Indian Complicated Urinary Tract Infections Patients: A Subgroup Analysis from a Phase 2 Study","authors":"Vaishali Gupte, Sandesh Sawant, Senthilnathan Mohanasundaram, Rohit Malabade, Anup Warrier, M. N. Sivakumar, Yogendra Pal Singh, Pradeep Bhattacharya, Rajesh Chawla, Jaideep Gogtay","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1616","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.1616","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Multidrug–resistant Enterobacteriaceae are a primary cause of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) worldwide. This study compared pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of plazomicin among Indian versus non–India participants. This was a post hoc analysis of PK data from the Phase 2 study (ACHN–490-002), a multicenter, double–blind, randomized, comparator–controlled study. Eligible participants (aged 18-85 years, body weight ≤100 kg) with documented/suspected cUTI or acute pyelonephritis received either 10 or 15 mg/kg plazomicin. Among 91 participants, 70 were non–Indian and 21 were Indian. For the 15 mg/kg dose, plazomicin demonstrated a higher area under the plasma time–concentration curve from time 0 to 24 h (AUC<sub>0-24</sub>) and maximum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) compared to the 10 mg/kg dose, which showed greater variability. At the 10 mg/kg dose, Indian participants had a mean AUC<sub>0-24</sub> of 163.0 mg•h/L, while non–Indian participants had a mean AUC<sub>0-24</sub> of 185.0 mg•h/L. The estimated mean plazomicin AUC<sub>0-24</sub> values were comparable between Indian and non–Indian participants. The mean C<sub>max</sub> for Indian participants was 17.2 mg•h/L, and for non–Indian participants it was 15.7 mg•h/L. Dose–normalized AUC<sub>0-24</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> point estimates were 110% and 103%, respectively. This showed comparable plazomicin exposure in Indian and non–Indian patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"14 12","pages":"903-910"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145318127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Zavegepant is the only calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist approved as a nasal spray in the United States for acute treatment of migraine in adults with or without aura. This Phase 1, open-label study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a single intranasal dose of zavegepant 10 mg in 12 healthy Chinese adults. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic assessment prior to dosing and from 5 min to 24 h post dose. Geometric mean values for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters were 53.53 ng h/mL for area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity, 44.25 ng h/mL for AUC from time zero to time of last quantifiable concentration, and 20.32 ng/mL for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax). Secondary parameters included time to Cmax (median, 0.58 h), apparent clearance (geometric mean, 186.8 L/h), apparent volume of distribution (geometric mean, 2943 L), and terminal half-life (arithmetic mean, 11.0 h). Results were comparable to exposures observed previously in non-Asian healthy participants following a single intranasal dose of zavegepant 10 mg. Zavegepant demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with no serious or severe adverse events and no clinically relevant findings regarding laboratory tests, vital signs, or electrocardiograms observed.
Zavegepant是唯一一种降钙素基因相关肽拮抗剂,在美国被批准作为鼻喷雾剂用于有或无先兆的成人偏头痛的急性治疗。这项1期开放标签研究评估了12名健康中国成年人单次鼻内给药10mg zavegepent的药代动力学、安全性和耐受性。在给药前和给药后5分钟至24小时采集血样进行药代动力学评估。主要药代动力学参数从时间0到无穷远的血药浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)几何平均值为53.53 ng h/mL,从时间0到最后可量化浓度时间(AUC)几何平均值为44.25 ng h/mL,最大血药浓度(Cmax)几何平均值为20.32 ng/mL。次要参数包括到达Cmax的时间(中位数,0.58 h)、表观间隙(几何平均值,186.8 L/h)、表观分布体积(几何平均值,2943 L)和终末半衰期(算术平均值,11.0 h)。结果与先前在非亚洲健康参与者中观察到的单次鼻内给药10mg zavegepent的暴露相当。Zavegepant显示出良好的安全性,没有严重或严重的不良事件,也没有在实验室检查、生命体征或心电图方面观察到临床相关发现。
{"title":"A Phase 1 Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of a Single Intranasal Dose of Zavegepant in Healthy Chinese Adults","authors":"Qiong Wei, Jufang Wu, Yangyi Dai, Jiaye Lin, Beikang Ge, Yanhui Sun, Jing Zhang, Jing Wang, Chen Li, Ding Ding, Jing Liu, Mohamed H. Shahin","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1617","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.1617","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Zavegepant is the only calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist approved as a nasal spray in the United States for acute treatment of migraine in adults with or without aura. This Phase 1, open-label study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a single intranasal dose of zavegepant 10 mg in 12 healthy Chinese adults. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic assessment prior to dosing and from 5 min to 24 h post dose. Geometric mean values for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters were 53.53 ng h/mL for area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity, 44.25 ng h/mL for AUC from time zero to time of last quantifiable concentration, and 20.32 ng/mL for maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>). Secondary parameters included time to C<sub>max</sub> (median, 0.58 h), apparent clearance (geometric mean, 186.8 L/h), apparent volume of distribution (geometric mean, 2943 L), and terminal half-life (arithmetic mean, 11.0 h). Results were comparable to exposures observed previously in non-Asian healthy participants following a single intranasal dose of zavegepant 10 mg. Zavegepant demonstrated a favorable safety profile, with no serious or severe adverse events and no clinically relevant findings regarding laboratory tests, vital signs, or electrocardiograms observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.1617","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145318192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Amir S. Youssef, Poonam Shah, Maxwell Hu, Helene Plein, Abhishek Roy, Ravi Sharma, Sarah Mole, Magdalena Blazejczyk, Wendy Cross, Brian Spears, Samuel Pak, Rejbinder Kaur, Robert Elston, Dickens Theodore, Marjan Hezareh, Ahmed Nader
Bepirovirsen, an antisense oligonucleotide in development for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, is administered from glass vials as a subcutaneous (SC) injection by healthcare professionals (HCPs). A ready-to-use prefilled syringe (PFS) assembled with a safety syringe device (SSD) has been developed to make administration more convenient and facilitate patient self-administration. This Phase 1, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study evaluated the relative bioavailability of bepirovirsen delivered from a vial or PFS SSD, assessed the viability of PFS SSD self-administration, and evaluated the safety and tolerability of SC bepirovirsen in healthy participants. Participants (N = 159) received a single 300 mg SC dose of bepirovirsen administered by a HCP (vial [n = 46] or PFS SSD [n = 49]), or self-administered (PFS SSD, with [n = 32] or without [n = 32] training from a HCP). Relative bioavailability (primary endpoint) of HCP-administered bepirovirsen delivered by vial versus PFS SSD was assessed using maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration–time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC(0-inf)). Participants were monitored for adverse events. Bepirovirsen exposure was bioequivalent when HCP-administered either by vial or PFS SSD; the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) were within the standard bioequivalence reference range, 0.80-1.25, for both Cmax (1.02 [0.91-1.14]) and AUC(0-inf) (1.05 [0.96-1.15]). Self-administration using PFS SSD achieved bioequivalence for bepirovirsen exposure compared with HCP administration. No new safety concerns were identified. These findings confirm that PFS SSD is a viable alternative to vials for bepirovirsen administration, when HCP- or self-administered, for the treatment of chronic HBV.
{"title":"A Phase 1, Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Relative Bioavailability and Safety of Subcutaneous Bepirovirsen when Delivered from a Vial or Prefilled Syringe Fitted with a Safety Syringe Device in Healthy Adult Participants","authors":"Amir S. Youssef, Poonam Shah, Maxwell Hu, Helene Plein, Abhishek Roy, Ravi Sharma, Sarah Mole, Magdalena Blazejczyk, Wendy Cross, Brian Spears, Samuel Pak, Rejbinder Kaur, Robert Elston, Dickens Theodore, Marjan Hezareh, Ahmed Nader","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1615","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.1615","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bepirovirsen, an antisense oligonucleotide in development for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, is administered from glass vials as a subcutaneous (SC) injection by healthcare professionals (HCPs). A ready-to-use prefilled syringe (PFS) assembled with a safety syringe device (SSD) has been developed to make administration more convenient and facilitate patient self-administration. This Phase 1, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study evaluated the relative bioavailability of bepirovirsen delivered from a vial or PFS SSD, assessed the viability of PFS SSD self-administration, and evaluated the safety and tolerability of SC bepirovirsen in healthy participants. Participants (N = 159) received a single 300 mg SC dose of bepirovirsen administered by a HCP (vial [n = 46] or PFS SSD [n = 49]), or self-administered (PFS SSD, with [n = 32] or without [n = 32] training from a HCP). Relative bioavailability (primary endpoint) of HCP-administered bepirovirsen delivered by vial versus PFS SSD was assessed using maximum observed plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) and area under the concentration–time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUC<sub>(0-inf)</sub>). Participants were monitored for adverse events. Bepirovirsen exposure was bioequivalent when HCP-administered either by vial or PFS SSD; the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) were within the standard bioequivalence reference range, 0.80-1.25, for both C<sub>max</sub> (1.02 [0.91-1.14]) and AUC<sub>(0-inf)</sub> (1.05 [0.96-1.15]). Self-administration using PFS SSD achieved bioequivalence for bepirovirsen exposure compared with HCP administration. No new safety concerns were identified. These findings confirm that PFS SSD is a viable alternative to vials for bepirovirsen administration, when HCP- or self-administered, for the treatment of chronic HBV.</p><p><b>Clinical trial identifier</b>: NCT06058390</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12856967/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145285640","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kar Ming Yee, Elton Sagim, Chuei Wuei Leong, Ivan Liew, Muhammad Najib Mahathar, Nurul Anis Zulhuda, Shahnun Ahmad, Nida Asnida Baharin, Narender Miryala, Narender Gaddamedi, Viresh Kumar Yarramshetti
This study aimed to assess the bioequivalence of a newly developed generic formulation of empagliflozin in comparison with the reference product. A total of 32 healthy adult volunteers participated in an open-label, randomized, balanced, two-treatment, two-sequence, two-period crossover study. Following an overnight fast, each participant received a 25 mg single oral dose of either the test or the reference empagliflozin with a 1-week washout period between treatments. Safety was monitored throughout the study, and 21 blood samples were collected at pre-dose and at multiple time points from 0.5 to 48 h post-dose. Plasma concentrations of empagliflozin were quantified using a validated LCMS/MS method following liquid–liquid extraction. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis and statistically compared between formulations using multivariate analysis of variance. The test formulation was well tolerated under fasting conditions, with no serious adverse events reported. The pharmacokinetic parameters, including Cmax and AUC0–t, were not significantly different between the test and reference products. The 90% confidence intervals of the Ln-transformed pharmacokinetic parameters fell within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80.00% to 125.00%. In conclusion, the test and reference formulations of empagliflozin 25 mg are bioequivalent under fasting conditions in healthy individuals.
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of two Empagliflozin Tablet Formulations: Results From a Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Study in Fasting Healthy Volunteers","authors":"Kar Ming Yee, Elton Sagim, Chuei Wuei Leong, Ivan Liew, Muhammad Najib Mahathar, Nurul Anis Zulhuda, Shahnun Ahmad, Nida Asnida Baharin, Narender Miryala, Narender Gaddamedi, Viresh Kumar Yarramshetti","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1614","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.1614","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to assess the bioequivalence of a newly developed generic formulation of empagliflozin in comparison with the reference product. A total of 32 healthy adult volunteers participated in an open-label, randomized, balanced, two-treatment, two-sequence, two-period crossover study. Following an overnight fast, each participant received a 25 mg single oral dose of either the test or the reference empagliflozin with a 1-week washout period between treatments. Safety was monitored throughout the study, and 21 blood samples were collected at pre-dose and at multiple time points from 0.5 to 48 h post-dose. Plasma concentrations of empagliflozin were quantified using a validated LCMS/MS method following liquid–liquid extraction. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis and statistically compared between formulations using multivariate analysis of variance. The test formulation was well tolerated under fasting conditions, with no serious adverse events reported. The pharmacokinetic parameters, including <i>C</i><sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>0–</sub><i><sub>t</sub></i>, were not significantly different between the test and reference products. The 90% confidence intervals of the Ln-transformed pharmacokinetic parameters fell within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80.00% to 125.00%. In conclusion, the test and reference formulations of empagliflozin 25 mg are bioequivalent under fasting conditions in healthy individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145279143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yu Peng, Ming Zhou, Hegui Yan, Zhixiang Pan, Yiyi Wang, Shuang Wei, Guan Liu
This randomized, open-label, single-dose crossover study evaluated the bioequivalence of a Chinese-manufactured oseltamivir phosphate oral suspension (7.5 mg/12.5 mL) against Tamiflu under fasting and fed conditions. A total of 42 healthy Chinese adults were enrolled in each group, with 39 completing the fasting group (3 withdrew) and 40 completing the fed group (1 withdrew in washout, 1 lost to follow-up). Plasma concentrations of oseltamivir and its active metabolite oseltamivir carboxylate were measured via LC-MS/MS, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental models. The 90% confidence intervals of key parameters fell within the 80.00-125.00% range, confirming bioequivalence. No serious adverse events occurred, indicating similar safety profiles. The test formulation is bioequivalent to Tamiflu under both fasting and fed conditions.
{"title":"Bioequivalence and Safety of Two Oseltamivir Phosphate for Oral Suspension in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions: A Randomized, Open‑Label, Single‑Dose, Crossover Study","authors":"Yu Peng, Ming Zhou, Hegui Yan, Zhixiang Pan, Yiyi Wang, Shuang Wei, Guan Liu","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1612","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.1612","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This randomized, open-label, single-dose crossover study evaluated the bioequivalence of a Chinese-manufactured oseltamivir phosphate oral suspension (7.5 mg/12.5 mL) against Tamiflu under fasting and fed conditions. A total of 42 healthy Chinese adults were enrolled in each group, with 39 completing the fasting group (3 withdrew) and 40 completing the fed group (1 withdrew in washout, 1 lost to follow-up). Plasma concentrations of oseltamivir and its active metabolite oseltamivir carboxylate were measured via LC-MS/MS, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental models. The 90% confidence intervals of key parameters fell within the 80.00-125.00% range, confirming bioequivalence. No serious adverse events occurred, indicating similar safety profiles. The test formulation is bioequivalent to Tamiflu under both fasting and fed conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145225045","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>Model-informed drug development (MIDD) has evolved from a promising innovation to a regulatory imperative in drug development. Over the past year, the regulatory landscape shifted. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) finalized guidance on oncology dose optimization under Project Optimus<span><sup>1, 2</sup></span> and institutionalized its MIDD Paired Meeting Program,<span><sup>3</sup></span> while ICH issued E11A for pediatric extrapolation<span><sup>4</sup></span> and released a draft guideline M15, developed under ICH auspices, on generalized MIDD principles.<span><sup>5</sup></span> These developments collectively transform early drug development: the goal is no longer just identifying a tolerated dose but quantitatively justifying optimal dosing for pivotal trials. By integrating pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), systems pharmacology, and real-world data, MIDD reduces development risks, accelerates first-in-human studies, and enables rational dose selection. Its expanding influence on decision-making underscores its role not only as a technical methodology but as a paradigm shift in early-phase development strategy.</p><p>In the last decade, the utility of MIDD has expanded significantly, driven by advances in computational modeling and an increasingly favorable regulatory environment. The FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have articulated frameworks encouraging the use of MIDD in early development, with the FDA's <i>MIDD Pilot Program</i> serving as a cornerstone initiative fostering sponsor–regulator dialogue.<span><sup>3, 5-7</sup></span> In 2025, such efforts have matured, with MIDD now recognized as central to regulatory submissions in oncology, rare diseases, and immunology.</p><p>Recent literature emphasizes that MIDD enables the translation of preclinical data into clinically relevant predictions with unprecedented precision. For example, Ren et al<span><sup>8</sup></span> highlight how PK/PD modeling refines dose optimization strategies in discovery and development, allowing earlier identification of optimal therapeutic windows.<span><sup>3</sup></span> This has relevance in first-in-human trials, where dose escalation strategies can now be informed by quantitative predictions rather than empirical trial-and-error. This shift reframes early-phase development from “first safe dose” thinking to “first scientifically informative dose.”</p><p>1. <i>First-in-Human Dose Prediction</i>. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling has revolutionized first-in-human dose selection, particularly for biologics and small molecules with complex metabolism. PBPK models incorporate variability in absorption, metabolism, and clearance across virtual populations, offering mechanistic insights that go beyond traditional allometric scaling.<span><sup>9</sup></span> In oncology and rare diseases, such models are increasingly used to support starting dose rationalization, minimizing both underdosing and toxicity risk
{"title":"Model-Informed Drug Development in Early-Phase Development: Navigating Complexity With Quantitative Clarity","authors":"Amalia M. Issa","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1607","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1607","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Model-informed drug development (MIDD) has evolved from a promising innovation to a regulatory imperative in drug development. Over the past year, the regulatory landscape shifted. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) finalized guidance on oncology dose optimization under Project Optimus<span><sup>1, 2</sup></span> and institutionalized its MIDD Paired Meeting Program,<span><sup>3</sup></span> while ICH issued E11A for pediatric extrapolation<span><sup>4</sup></span> and released a draft guideline M15, developed under ICH auspices, on generalized MIDD principles.<span><sup>5</sup></span> These developments collectively transform early drug development: the goal is no longer just identifying a tolerated dose but quantitatively justifying optimal dosing for pivotal trials. By integrating pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), systems pharmacology, and real-world data, MIDD reduces development risks, accelerates first-in-human studies, and enables rational dose selection. Its expanding influence on decision-making underscores its role not only as a technical methodology but as a paradigm shift in early-phase development strategy.</p><p>In the last decade, the utility of MIDD has expanded significantly, driven by advances in computational modeling and an increasingly favorable regulatory environment. The FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have articulated frameworks encouraging the use of MIDD in early development, with the FDA's <i>MIDD Pilot Program</i> serving as a cornerstone initiative fostering sponsor–regulator dialogue.<span><sup>3, 5-7</sup></span> In 2025, such efforts have matured, with MIDD now recognized as central to regulatory submissions in oncology, rare diseases, and immunology.</p><p>Recent literature emphasizes that MIDD enables the translation of preclinical data into clinically relevant predictions with unprecedented precision. For example, Ren et al<span><sup>8</sup></span> highlight how PK/PD modeling refines dose optimization strategies in discovery and development, allowing earlier identification of optimal therapeutic windows.<span><sup>3</sup></span> This has relevance in first-in-human trials, where dose escalation strategies can now be informed by quantitative predictions rather than empirical trial-and-error. This shift reframes early-phase development from “first safe dose” thinking to “first scientifically informative dose.”</p><p>1. <i>First-in-Human Dose Prediction</i>. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling has revolutionized first-in-human dose selection, particularly for biologics and small molecules with complex metabolism. PBPK models incorporate variability in absorption, metabolism, and clearance across virtual populations, offering mechanistic insights that go beyond traditional allometric scaling.<span><sup>9</sup></span> In oncology and rare diseases, such models are increasingly used to support starting dose rationalization, minimizing both underdosing and toxicity risk","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"14 10","pages":"738-741"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.1607","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145196454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
To investigate the pharmacokinetic characteristics of bromocriptine mesylate tablets in healthy Chinese subjects and to assess their bioequivalence and safety. A randomized, open-label, single-dose, four-period, two-sequence, complete crossover study was conducted. Forty healthy volunteers were enrolled and administered a single oral dose of 2.5 mg of either the test formulation (T) or the reference formulation (R) of bromocriptine mesylate tablets under fed conditions, with a 7-day washout period between treatments. Plasma concentrations of bromocriptine mesylate were measured using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using Phoenix WinNonlin software for bioequivalence evaluation. Geometric mean ratios of maximum concentration, the area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration, and the area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity were calculated: maximum concentration by reference-scaled average bioequivalence using a 95% upper confidence bound, and the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration and the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity by average bioequivalence with 90% confidence intervals. Data from the fed trial met the bioequivalence criteria. No serious adverse reactions were observed, indicating that the test and reference bromocriptine mesylate tablets have similar safety profiles under fed conditions.
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics, Bioequivalence, and Safety of Bromocriptine Mesylate Tablets in Healthy Chinese Subjects","authors":"Huan Song, Yujun Chen, Lianlian Chen, Xianmiao Yin, Huan Li, Fangliang Gan","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1610","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.1610","url":null,"abstract":"<p>To investigate the pharmacokinetic characteristics of bromocriptine mesylate tablets in healthy Chinese subjects and to assess their bioequivalence and safety. A randomized, open-label, single-dose, four-period, two-sequence, complete crossover study was conducted. Forty healthy volunteers were enrolled and administered a single oral dose of 2.5 mg of either the test formulation (T) or the reference formulation (R) of bromocriptine mesylate tablets under fed conditions, with a 7-day washout period between treatments. Plasma concentrations of bromocriptine mesylate were measured using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using Phoenix WinNonlin software for bioequivalence evaluation. Geometric mean ratios of maximum concentration, the area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration, and the area under the concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity were calculated: maximum concentration by reference-scaled average bioequivalence using a 95% upper confidence bound, and the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration and the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity by average bioequivalence with 90% confidence intervals. Data from the fed trial met the bioequivalence criteria. No serious adverse reactions were observed, indicating that the test and reference bromocriptine mesylate tablets have similar safety profiles under fed conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145184740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Paul Rolan, Elizabeth Doolin, Dharam Paul, Julia Crossman, Michael Odontiadis, Philippe Danjou, Mark Smith, Spyros Papapetropoulos
BNC210 is an investigational small molecule selective negative allosteric modulator of the alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7 nAChR). It is an anxiolytic compound with a novel mechanism of action. In a series of Phase 1 clinical trials in healthy volunteers, psychometric test batteries showed that BNC210 did not cause attention, cognition, or memory impairment, negative effects on mood or emotional stability, sedation, or addiction, ruling out undesirable side effects of known anxiolytic compounds. In healthy volunteers, target engagement at the α7 nAChR was demonstrated in a nicotine shift assay using quantitative electroencephalography, and BNC210 demonstrated improvement in panic-like symptoms in a cholecystokinin tetrapeptide panic model. Initial clinical trials used an aqueous suspension formulation of BNC210 to cover a wide dosage range; however, its pharmacokinetic parameters were consistent with solubility-limited absorption and a significant food effect. A dispersible tablet formulation was then developed with improved bioavailability and is being used in Phases 2 and 3 clinical trials. Collectively, the Phase 1 data demonstrated desired properties of BNC210 supporting proof-of-concept clinical trials. BNC210 is currently being developed for acute, as-needed treatment of social anxiety disorder and chronic treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder.
{"title":"The Pathway to Proof-of-Concept for BNC210, a Negative Allosteric Modulator of the Alpha-7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor (nAChR), for Treatment of Psychiatric Disease","authors":"Paul Rolan, Elizabeth Doolin, Dharam Paul, Julia Crossman, Michael Odontiadis, Philippe Danjou, Mark Smith, Spyros Papapetropoulos","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1609","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.1609","url":null,"abstract":"<p>BNC210 is an investigational small molecule selective negative allosteric modulator of the alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7 nAChR). It is an anxiolytic compound with a novel mechanism of action. In a series of Phase 1 clinical trials in healthy volunteers, psychometric test batteries showed that BNC210 did not cause attention, cognition, or memory impairment, negative effects on mood or emotional stability, sedation, or addiction, ruling out undesirable side effects of known anxiolytic compounds. In healthy volunteers, target engagement at the α7 nAChR was demonstrated in a nicotine shift assay using quantitative electroencephalography, and BNC210 demonstrated improvement in panic-like symptoms in a cholecystokinin tetrapeptide panic model. Initial clinical trials used an aqueous suspension formulation of BNC210 to cover a wide dosage range; however, its pharmacokinetic parameters were consistent with solubility-limited absorption and a significant food effect. A dispersible tablet formulation was then developed with improved bioavailability and is being used in Phases 2 and 3 clinical trials. Collectively, the Phase 1 data demonstrated desired properties of BNC210 supporting proof-of-concept clinical trials. BNC210 is currently being developed for acute, as-needed treatment of social anxiety disorder and chronic treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12856972/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145173715","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}