首页 > 最新文献

Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development最新文献

英文 中文
Bioequivalence Between a Gantenerumab Disposable Syringe and an Autoinjector: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Healthy Volunteers. Gantenerumab一次性注射器和自动注射器的生物等效性:一项健康志愿者的随机对照试验
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70038
Dietmar Schwab, Carsten Hofmann, Nicole Justies, Daniel S Dickerson, Ali Keshavarz, Thijs van Iersel, Kimberly Martens, Beate Bittner

Gantenerumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting amyloid beta plaques in the brain, reduces plaque accumulation and was developed to slow Alzheimer's disease progression. Results from the pivotal GRADUATE I and II studies evaluating gantenerumab in people with early Alzheimer's disease were announced in 2022. The studies did not meet their primary endpoint of slowing clinical decline. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and safety of a high concentration liquid formulation of gantenerumab administered subcutaneously as a single dose using an autoinjector (AI) or a disposable syringe (DS). The DS was employed in pivotal clinical trials, while the AI was developed in parallel to ease SC administration. The study aimed to demonstrate bioequivalence (BE) between AI and DS administration in healthy participants, defined by 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for geometric least square (LS) mean ratios being within the 0.80-1.25 range for maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). Among the 266 healthy participants, 135 received 255 mg gantenerumab via AI and 131 received 255 mg via DS in a parallel group design. BE between AI and DS SC administration was demonstrated with geometric LS mean ratios (90% CIs) for Cmax, AUC0-inf, and AUC0-last of 1.078 (1.006, 1.155), 1.053 (0.986, 1.124), and 1.054 (0.992, 1.121), respectively, all within the 0.80-1.25 BE range. Safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of gantenerumab.

Gantenerumab是一种针对大脑中β淀粉样蛋白斑块的单克隆抗体,可减少斑块积累,并被开发用于减缓阿尔茨海默病的进展。关键的GRADUATE I和II研究评估了gantenerumab在早期阿尔茨海默病患者中的应用,结果于2022年公布。这些研究没有达到减缓临床衰退的主要终点。本研究评估了使用自动注射器(AI)或一次性注射器(DS)皮下单剂量给药的高浓度液体制剂的药代动力学、免疫原性和安全性。DS用于关键的临床试验,而AI则同时开发,以简化SC的给药。该研究旨在证明健康受试者中AI和DS给药之间的生物等效性(BE),定义为几何最小二乘(LS)平均比值在0.80-1.25范围内的90%置信区间(CIs),最大观察血浆浓度(Cmax)和血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)。在平行组设计中,266名健康参与者中,135名通过AI接受了255 mg的gantenerumab, 131名通过DS接受了255 mg的gantenerumab。Cmax、AUC0-inf和AUC0-last的几何LS平均比值(90% ci)分别为1.078(1.006,1.155)、1.053(0.986,1.124)和1.054(0.992,1.121),均在0.80-1.25 BE范围内。安全性研究结果与gantenerumab的已知安全性一致。
{"title":"Bioequivalence Between a Gantenerumab Disposable Syringe and an Autoinjector: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Healthy Volunteers.","authors":"Dietmar Schwab, Carsten Hofmann, Nicole Justies, Daniel S Dickerson, Ali Keshavarz, Thijs van Iersel, Kimberly Martens, Beate Bittner","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.70038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gantenerumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting amyloid beta plaques in the brain, reduces plaque accumulation and was developed to slow Alzheimer's disease progression. Results from the pivotal GRADUATE I and II studies evaluating gantenerumab in people with early Alzheimer's disease were announced in 2022. The studies did not meet their primary endpoint of slowing clinical decline. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and safety of a high concentration liquid formulation of gantenerumab administered subcutaneously as a single dose using an autoinjector (AI) or a disposable syringe (DS). The DS was employed in pivotal clinical trials, while the AI was developed in parallel to ease SC administration. The study aimed to demonstrate bioequivalence (BE) between AI and DS administration in healthy participants, defined by 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for geometric least square (LS) mean ratios being within the 0.80-1.25 range for maximum observed plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). Among the 266 healthy participants, 135 received 255 mg gantenerumab via AI and 131 received 255 mg via DS in a parallel group design. BE between AI and DS SC administration was demonstrated with geometric LS mean ratios (90% CIs) for C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-inf</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-last</sub> of 1.078 (1.006, 1.155), 1.053 (0.986, 1.124), and 1.054 (0.992, 1.121), respectively, all within the 0.80-1.25 BE range. Safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of gantenerumab.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 2","pages":"e70038"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146218732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Metformin/Empagliflozin Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Study 两种二甲双胍/恩格列净固定剂量联合片在空腹和进食条件下的生物等效性评价:一项随机、开放标签、交叉研究
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-24 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70029
Yuyan Lei, Qin Yi, Shan Ji, Juli Lu, Zhenya Yang

This study evaluated the bioequivalence and safety of two fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet formulations of metformin/empagliflozin (1000 mg/5 mg) in healthy Chinese subjects. A single-center, open-label, randomized, two-period, two-treatment, and two-sequence crossover study was conducted, enrolling 56 subjects who were assigned to either fasting or fed conditions in a 1:1 ratio. Each subject received both the test and reference formulations, with a 7-day washout period between administrations. Blood samples were collected up to 48 h post-dose, and plasma concentrations of metformin and empagliflozin were determined using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Bioequivalence was assessed based on key pharmacokinetic parameters—Cmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞—with the geometric least-squares mean ratios of the test to reference formulation falling within the accepted bioequivalence range of 80.00% to 125.00% for all 90% confidence intervals under both fasting and fed states. High-fat meals significantly reduced the Cmax of metformin and empagliflozin by approximately 47% and 28%, respectively, and their overall exposure (AUC0−∞) by approximately 29% and 15%, respectively. No serious adverse events were reported. In conclusion, the test and reference formulations of metformin/empagliflozin FDC tablets were bioequivalent and well-tolerated under both fasting and fed conditions.

本研究评价了二甲双胍/恩帕列净(1000 mg/5 mg)两种固定剂量联合片剂在中国健康人体内的生物等效性和安全性。进行了一项单中心、开放标签、随机、两期、两治疗、两序列的交叉研究,纳入56名受试者,他们按1:1的比例被分配到禁食或进食状态。每位受试者同时服用测试配方和参考配方,两次给药之间有7天的洗脱期。给药后48 h采集血液样本,采用经验证的液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)方法测定血浆中二甲双胍和恩格列净的浓度。根据关键药代动力学参数cmax、AUC0-t和AUC0-∞评估生物等效性,在禁食和喂养状态下,试验与参考制剂的几何最小二乘平均比值在所有90%置信区间内均在80.00%至125.00%的可接受生物等效性范围内。高脂肪饮食显著降低二甲双胍和恩格列净的Cmax分别约47%和28%,其总暴露量(AUC0-∞)分别约29%和15%。无严重不良事件报告。综上所述,二甲双胍/恩帕列净FDC片的试验处方和参考处方在禁食和喂养条件下均具有生物等效性和良好的耐受性。
{"title":"Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Metformin/Empagliflozin Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Study","authors":"Yuyan Lei,&nbsp;Qin Yi,&nbsp;Shan Ji,&nbsp;Juli Lu,&nbsp;Zhenya Yang","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70029","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70029","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study evaluated the bioequivalence and safety of two fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet formulations of metformin/empagliflozin (1000 mg/5 mg) in healthy Chinese subjects. A single-center, open-label, randomized, two-period, two-treatment, and two-sequence crossover study was conducted, enrolling 56 subjects who were assigned to either fasting or fed conditions in a 1:1 ratio. Each subject received both the test and reference formulations, with a 7-day washout period between administrations. Blood samples were collected up to 48 h post-dose, and plasma concentrations of metformin and empagliflozin were determined using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Bioequivalence was assessed based on key pharmacokinetic parameters—C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0–t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0–∞</sub>—with the geometric least-squares mean ratios of the test to reference formulation falling within the accepted bioequivalence range of 80.00% to 125.00% for all 90% confidence intervals under both fasting and fed states. High-fat meals significantly reduced the C<sub>max</sub> of metformin and empagliflozin by approximately 47% and 28%, respectively, and their overall exposure (AUC<sub>0−∞</sub>) by approximately 29% and 15%, respectively. No serious adverse events were reported. In conclusion, the test and reference formulations of metformin/empagliflozin FDC tablets were bioequivalent and well-tolerated under both fasting and fed conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146040657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Human Mass Balance and Metabolism Study of [14C]-Ubrogepant in Healthy Male Adults [14C]-生长因子在健康男性体内的质量平衡与代谢研究
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70010
Ramesh R. Boinpally, Joshua Rowe, Pushpa Chandrasekar, Rebecca B. White, Eugene E. Marcantonio, Nicole Trainor, Yuexia Liang, Cheri Maciolek, James H. Small, Robert Houle, Michael J. Hafey, Huizhi Xie, Jocelyn Yabut, Christine Fandozzi

Ubrogepant is a calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonist approved for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in adults. The mass balance and metabolism of ubrogepant was evaluated in six healthy male adults administered a single oral dose of [14C]-ubrogepant 50 mg (∼200 µCi). Overall, the mean total radioactivity recovery was 92.4% (95% CI: 77.8%-107%) of the administered dose, with 82.9% in feces (95% CI: 66.7%-99.1%) and 9.52% in urine (95% CI: 7.78%-11.3%). Ubrogepant was eliminated mainly via metabolism, primarily via biliary/fecal excretion. Approximately 42% and 6% of the dose was excreted as unchanged parent drug in feces and urine, respectively. The major circulating components of drug-related material (DRM) in pooled plasma samples were ubrogepant (55%), M15 (13%), and M20 (3.5%). M15 (glucuronide of methylated catechol) and M20 (glucuronide of mono-oxygenated ubrogepant [M8]) also were the main metabolites in urine, together representing about 2% of DRM. In feces, the main metabolites were the oxidative metabolites M6 (di-oxygenated ubrogepant) and M8, together representing about 29% of DRM. In vitro assays showed that ubrogepant metabolism occurs predominantly via CYP3A4.

Ubrogepant是一种降钙素基因相关肽受体拮抗剂,被批准用于有或无先兆偏头痛的急性治疗。研究人员对6名健康成年男性进行了肥壮剂的质量平衡和代谢评估,这些男性服用单次口服[14C]肥壮剂50 mg(~ 200µCi)。总体而言,平均总放射性回收率为给药剂量的92.4% (95% CI: 77.8%-107%),其中粪便中为82.9% (95% CI: 66.7%-99.1%),尿液中为9.52% (95% CI: 7.78%-11.3%)。膨填充物主要通过代谢消除,主要通过胆汁/粪便排泄。约42%和6%的剂量分别作为未改变的母药随粪便和尿液排出体外。血浆样品中药物相关物质(DRM)的主要循环成分为增稠剂(55%)、M15(13%)和M20(3.5%)。M15(甲基化儿茶酚的葡萄糖醛酸盐)和M20(单氧增殖剂的葡萄糖醛酸盐[M8])也是尿液中的主要代谢物,约占DRM的2%。粪便中主要代谢物为氧化代谢物M6(二氧增殖剂)和M8,约占DRM的29%。体外实验表明,肥胖代谢主要通过CYP3A4发生。
{"title":"A Human Mass Balance and Metabolism Study of [14C]-Ubrogepant in Healthy Male Adults","authors":"Ramesh R. Boinpally,&nbsp;Joshua Rowe,&nbsp;Pushpa Chandrasekar,&nbsp;Rebecca B. White,&nbsp;Eugene E. Marcantonio,&nbsp;Nicole Trainor,&nbsp;Yuexia Liang,&nbsp;Cheri Maciolek,&nbsp;James H. Small,&nbsp;Robert Houle,&nbsp;Michael J. Hafey,&nbsp;Huizhi Xie,&nbsp;Jocelyn Yabut,&nbsp;Christine Fandozzi","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70010","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70010","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ubrogepant is a calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonist approved for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in adults. The mass balance and metabolism of ubrogepant was evaluated in six healthy male adults administered a single oral dose of [<sup>14</sup>C]-ubrogepant 50 mg (∼200 µCi). Overall, the mean total radioactivity recovery was 92.4% (95% CI: 77.8%-107%) of the administered dose, with 82.9% in feces (95% CI: 66.7%-99.1%) and 9.52% in urine (95% CI: 7.78%-11.3%). Ubrogepant was eliminated mainly via metabolism, primarily via biliary/fecal excretion. Approximately 42% and 6% of the dose was excreted as unchanged parent drug in feces and urine, respectively. The major circulating components of drug-related material (DRM) in pooled plasma samples were ubrogepant (55%), M15 (13%), and M20 (3.5%). M15 (glucuronide of methylated catechol) and M20 (glucuronide of mono-oxygenated ubrogepant [M8]) also were the main metabolites in urine, together representing about 2% of DRM. In feces, the main metabolites were the oxidative metabolites M6 (di-oxygenated ubrogepant) and M8, together representing about 29% of DRM. In vitro assays showed that ubrogepant metabolism occurs predominantly via CYP3A4.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12821552/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146009286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
First-In-Human Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of DS-6016a After Single Subcutaneous Injection in Healthy Japanese Adults 日本健康成人单次皮下注射DS-6016a的药代动力学和安全性的首次人体研究
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70023
Kei Okita, Hidetoshi Furuie, Akifumi Kurata, Yasuko Owada, Satoshi Yoshiba, Kei Furihata, Takaaki Oka, Yushi Kashihara, Hitoshi Ishizuka, Kazutaka Yoshihara

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva is a rare, progressive autosomal dominant genetic disease caused by an activin receptor-like kinase 2 (ALK2) mutation with a need for effective prophylactic therapies. This single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of DS-6016a, a novel humanized monoclonal anti-ALK2 antibody, in healthy Japanese adults. In each of the 5–1000 mg DS-6016a or placebo single subcutaneous dose cohorts, eight male participants were randomly assigned at a 3:1 ratio. DS-6016a had median times to maximum plasma concentration of 144–240 h and elimination half-lives of 391–844 h. The increase in DS-6016a exposure was greater than dose-proportional across the dose range of 5–1000 mg. The incidence of study drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 17% in the placebo group and 11% across all DS-6016a groups; all were mild and resolved without treatment. No deaths, serious or severe TEAEs, or TEAEs leading to study discontinuation were reported. Ferritin showed a statistically significant dose-dependent decrease from baseline, while serum iron showed no clear dose-dependency. No relationship was observed between DS-6016a dose and the development of anti-drug antibodies. DS-6016a had an acceptable safety profile at single subcutaneous doses of 5–1000 mg.

进行性骨化纤维发育不良是一种罕见的进行性常染色体显性遗传病,由激活素受体样激酶2 (ALK2)突变引起,需要有效的预防治疗。这项单中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究评估了DS-6016a(一种新型人源化单克隆抗alk2抗体)在健康日本成年人中的药代动力学和安全性。在每组5-1000 mg DS-6016a或安慰剂单次皮下剂量组中,8名男性受试者按3:1的比例随机分配。DS-6016a的最大血药浓度中位时间为144-240小时,消除半衰期为391-844小时。在5-1000 mg剂量范围内,DS-6016a暴露的增加大于剂量正比。研究药物相关治疗不良事件(teae)的发生率在安慰剂组为17%,所有DS-6016a组为11%;所有病例均为轻度,无需治疗即可痊愈。没有死亡、严重或严重teae或teae导致研究中止的报告。铁蛋白从基线开始呈剂量依赖性下降,而血清铁没有明显的剂量依赖性。DS-6016a剂量与抗药物抗体的产生没有关系。DS-6016a单次皮下剂量为5- 1000mg时具有可接受的安全性。
{"title":"First-In-Human Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of DS-6016a After Single Subcutaneous Injection in Healthy Japanese Adults","authors":"Kei Okita,&nbsp;Hidetoshi Furuie,&nbsp;Akifumi Kurata,&nbsp;Yasuko Owada,&nbsp;Satoshi Yoshiba,&nbsp;Kei Furihata,&nbsp;Takaaki Oka,&nbsp;Yushi Kashihara,&nbsp;Hitoshi Ishizuka,&nbsp;Kazutaka Yoshihara","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70023","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70023","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva is a rare, progressive autosomal dominant genetic disease caused by an activin receptor-like kinase 2 (ALK2) mutation with a need for effective prophylactic therapies. This single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of DS-6016a, a novel humanized monoclonal anti-ALK2 antibody, in healthy Japanese adults. In each of the 5–1000 mg DS-6016a or placebo single subcutaneous dose cohorts, eight male participants were randomly assigned at a 3:1 ratio. DS-6016a had median times to maximum plasma concentration of 144–240 h and elimination half-lives of 391–844 h. The increase in DS-6016a exposure was greater than dose-proportional across the dose range of 5–1000 mg. The incidence of study drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 17% in the placebo group and 11% across all DS-6016a groups; all were mild and resolved without treatment. No deaths, serious or severe TEAEs, or TEAEs leading to study discontinuation were reported. Ferritin showed a statistically significant dose-dependent decrease from baseline, while serum iron showed no clear dose-dependency. No relationship was observed between DS-6016a dose and the development of anti-drug antibodies. DS-6016a had an acceptable safety profile at single subcutaneous doses of 5–1000 mg.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12821564/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146009305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pharmacokinetic Interaction Among Amlodipine, Losartan, and Chlorthalidone after a Single Oral Administration in Healthy Male Subjects 健康男性单次口服氨氯地平、氯沙坦和氯噻酮的药代动力学相互作用
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70024
Seol Ju Moon, Sung Hee Hong, Yirang Lim, Jae-Yong Chung

Antihypertensive drugs are more potent when administered in combinations of two or three different classes of drugs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction among amlodipine, losartan, and chlorthalidone. A randomized, open-label, four-sequence, four-period, four-treatment, single-dose study was conducted in healthy Korean male subjects, with oral administrations of two tablets of amlodipine 5 mg, one tablet of losartan 100 mg, one tablet of chlorthalidone 25 mg, or co-administration of all three investigational products. Plasma drug concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Twenty-six subjects completed the study. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of Cmax and AUClast, respectively, were 1.0928 (1.0412-1.1469) and 1.0360 (0.9958-1.0778) for amlodipine; 1.1016 (0.9136-1.3284) and 1.1606 (1.0885-1.2375) for losartan; 1.0720 (1.0119-1.1356) and 1.0902 (1.0350-1.1148) for EXP3174 (active metabolite of losartan); and 0.9462 (0.8626-1.0379) and 1.0266 (0.9752-1.0807) for chlorthalidone. All the treatments were well tolerated overall. Besides the slight increase in losartan Cmax, the combination therapy did not show clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions in terms of systemic drug exposure.

当两种或三种不同类别的药物联合使用时,降压药的效果更强。本研究的目的是评价氨氯地平、氯沙坦和氯噻酮之间的药代动力学相互作用。在健康的韩国男性受试者中进行了一项随机、开放标签、四顺序、四周期、四治疗、单剂量的研究,口服2片氨氯地平(5mg)、1片氯沙坦(100mg)、1片氯噻酮(25mg),或同时给药所有3种研究产品。采用液相色谱/串联质谱法测定血浆药物浓度。26名受试者完成了这项研究。氨氯地平的Cmax和AUClast的几何平均比值和90%置信区间分别为1.0928(1.0412 ~ 1.1469)和1.0360 (0.9958 ~ 1.0778);氯沙坦为1.1016(0.9136-1.3284)、1.1606 (1.0885-1.2375);EXP3174(氯沙坦活性代谢物)的1.0720(1.0119-1.1356)和1.0902 (1.0350-1.1148);氯噻酮为0.9462(0.8626-1.0379)、1.0266(0.9752-1.0807)。所有的治疗总体上耐受良好。除了氯沙坦Cmax略有增加外,联合治疗在全身药物暴露方面没有表现出临床显著的药代动力学相互作用。
{"title":"Pharmacokinetic Interaction Among Amlodipine, Losartan, and Chlorthalidone after a Single Oral Administration in Healthy Male Subjects","authors":"Seol Ju Moon,&nbsp;Sung Hee Hong,&nbsp;Yirang Lim,&nbsp;Jae-Yong Chung","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70024","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70024","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Antihypertensive drugs are more potent when administered in combinations of two or three different classes of drugs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction among amlodipine, losartan, and chlorthalidone. A randomized, open-label, four-sequence, four-period, four-treatment, single-dose study was conducted in healthy Korean male subjects, with oral administrations of two tablets of amlodipine 5 mg, one tablet of losartan 100 mg, one tablet of chlorthalidone 25 mg, or co-administration of all three investigational products. Plasma drug concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Twenty-six subjects completed the study. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>last,</sub> respectively, were 1.0928 (1.0412-1.1469) and 1.0360 (0.9958-1.0778) for amlodipine; 1.1016 (0.9136-1.3284) and 1.1606 (1.0885-1.2375) for losartan; 1.0720 (1.0119-1.1356) and 1.0902 (1.0350-1.1148) for EXP3174 (active metabolite of losartan); and 0.9462 (0.8626-1.0379) and 1.0266 (0.9752-1.0807) for chlorthalidone. All the treatments were well tolerated overall. Besides the slight increase in losartan C<sub>max</sub>, the combination therapy did not show clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions in terms of systemic drug exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Atorvastatin and Hybutimibe in Healthy Chinese Volunteers 阿托伐他汀和布替米比在中国健康志愿者体内的药动学相互作用。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70017
Jia-ying Wang, Wen-jun Chen, Zou-rong Ruan, Xue-hua Zhang, Jia-qiu Du, Xiao-feng Cui, Rong Shao, Dan-dan Yang, Hong-gang Lou, Bo Jiang

Stains and cholesterol absorption inhibitors are frequently co-administered in the management of dyslipidemia. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between atorvastatin and hybutimibe in healthy Chinese subjects. A randomized, open-label, three-treatment, six-period crossover study was conducted involving 24 participants. Subjects received once-daily treatments for 14 days per period (14-day washout): atorvastatin 20 mg, hybutimibe 10 mg, or their combination. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and their 90% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) of atorvastatin, hybutimibe, and their metabolites, comparing combination therapy with monotherapy. At steady state, the GMRs (90% CI) for atorvastatin were 89.9 (74.6, 108.2) for Cmax and 103.7 (96.0, 112.0) for AUC0-∞ when administered with or without hybutimibe. For total hybutimibe, the corresponding values were 120.6 (102.4, 142.0) and 105.7 (97.1, 115.2), respectively. Considering the limited PK changes and good safety profiles of both drugs, the interaction between atorvastatin and hybutimibe will likely have no significant clinical impact.

染色剂和胆固醇吸收抑制剂在治疗血脂异常时经常联合使用。本研究评价了阿托伐他汀和布替米比在中国健康受试者体内的药代动力学相互作用。一项随机、开放标签、三种治疗、六期交叉研究涉及24名参与者。受试者接受每日一次的治疗,每期14天(14天洗脱期):阿托伐他汀20mg,布替麦比10mg,或其组合。计算阿托伐他汀、布替米比及其代谢物的最大血浆浓度(Cmax)和血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)的几何平均比(gmr)及其90%置信区间(CI),比较联合治疗与单药治疗。在稳定状态下,阿托伐他汀的gmr (90% CI)为Cmax为89.9 (74.6,108.2),AUC0-∞为103.7(96.0,112.0)。总杂生物量分别为120.6(102.4、142.0)和105.7(97.1、115.2)。考虑到两种药物有限的PK变化和良好的安全性,阿托伐他汀和布替米比的相互作用可能不会产生显著的临床影响。
{"title":"Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Atorvastatin and Hybutimibe in Healthy Chinese Volunteers","authors":"Jia-ying Wang,&nbsp;Wen-jun Chen,&nbsp;Zou-rong Ruan,&nbsp;Xue-hua Zhang,&nbsp;Jia-qiu Du,&nbsp;Xiao-feng Cui,&nbsp;Rong Shao,&nbsp;Dan-dan Yang,&nbsp;Hong-gang Lou,&nbsp;Bo Jiang","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70017","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70017","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Stains and cholesterol absorption inhibitors are frequently co-administered in the management of dyslipidemia. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between atorvastatin and hybutimibe in healthy Chinese subjects. A randomized, open-label, three-treatment, six-period crossover study was conducted involving 24 participants. Subjects received once-daily treatments for 14 days per period (14-day washout): atorvastatin 20 mg, hybutimibe 10 mg, or their combination. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and their 90% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) and the area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) of atorvastatin, hybutimibe, and their metabolites, comparing combination therapy with monotherapy. At steady state, the GMRs (90% CI) for atorvastatin were 89.9 (74.6, 108.2) for C<sub>max</sub> and 103.7 (96.0, 112.0) for AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> when administered with or without hybutimibe. For total hybutimibe, the corresponding values were 120.6 (102.4, 142.0) and 105.7 (97.1, 115.2), respectively. Considering the limited PK changes and good safety profiles of both drugs, the interaction between atorvastatin and hybutimibe will likely have no significant clinical impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of a BTLA Agonist Antibody (Venanprubart) in Healthy Participants, Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, and Patients with Psoriasis: Results From Three Phase 1 Studies BTLA激动剂抗体(Venanprubart)在健康参与者、系统性红斑狼疮患者和牛皮癣患者中的安全性、耐受性、药代动力学和免疫原性:三项1期研究的结果
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70014
Andrew C. Vendel, Olivier Benichou, Ching-Yun Chang, Gourab Datta, Andrea Ferrante, Indrajit Ghosh, Brian A. Moser, Susan E. Sweeney, Jennifer Witcher, Matthew D. Linnik

Venanprubart (LY3361237), an agonist antibody to B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA), was developed as a potential treatment for autoimmune disorders, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and psoriasis. We tested venanprubart in three human Phase 1 safety studies: a single ascending dose (SAD) study in healthy participants (1/2/5/15/50/150 mg subcutaneously, or 150/400 mg intravenously; n = 64), a multiple ascending dose study in patients with SLE (six doses every 2 weeks at 50/150/450 mg subcutaneously; n = 28), and a randomized controlled study in patients with psoriasis (six doses every 2 weeks at 450 mg subcutaneously; n = 24). Key endpoints across studies included safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, receptor occupancy of BTLA on B cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and immunogenicity as measured by treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies (TE ADA). Venanprubart was well tolerated in healthy participants and in patients with SLE and psoriasis. No participants discontinued treatment due to adverse events, and nearly all treatment-emergent events were mild or moderate. The pharmacokinetic profile of venanprubart was nonlinear. Serum concentrations of venanprubart increased greater than dose proportionally at lower doses, but exposure became more linear after target binding was nearly saturated. Higher doses led to high levels of receptor occupancy on B cells, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells, indicating a high level of target engagement. Irrespective of titer, TE ADA incidence was 79%, 71%, and 71% for healthy participants, patients with SLE, and patients with psoriasis, respectively. ADA titers were lower in the repeat-dose studies compared to the SAD study, especially at higher doses.

Venanprubart (LY3361237)是一种B和T淋巴细胞减毒剂(BTLA)的激动剂抗体,被开发用于治疗自身免疫性疾病,包括系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)和牛皮癣。我们测试了venanprubart三个人类第一阶段安全性研究:一个提升剂量(SAD)研究在健康参与者(1/2/5/15/50/150 mg皮下注射,静脉注射或150/400毫克;n = 64),多个提升剂量研究系统性红斑狼疮患者(6个剂量每2周50/150/450 mg皮下注射;n = 28),和一个随机对照研究银屑病患者(6每2周450毫克剂量皮下注射;n = 24)。这些研究的关键终点包括安全性和耐受性、药代动力学、BTLA在B细胞、CD4+ T细胞、CD8+ T细胞上的受体占用,以及通过治疗产生的抗药物抗体(TE ADA)测量的免疫原性。Venanprubart在健康参与者和SLE和牛皮癣患者中耐受性良好。没有参与者因不良事件而停止治疗,几乎所有治疗发生的事件都是轻度或中度的。维南普鲁巴特的药动学曲线呈非线性。在低剂量下,维南普bart的血清浓度比剂量成比例地增加,但在靶结合接近饱和后,暴露变得更加线性。高剂量导致B细胞、CD4+和CD8+ T细胞上的高水平受体占用,表明高水平的靶标占用。无论滴度如何,健康参与者、SLE患者和牛皮癣患者的TE - ADA发病率分别为79%、71%和71%。与SAD研究相比,重复剂量研究中ADA滴度较低,特别是在高剂量时。
{"title":"Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of a BTLA Agonist Antibody (Venanprubart) in Healthy Participants, Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, and Patients with Psoriasis: Results From Three Phase 1 Studies","authors":"Andrew C. Vendel,&nbsp;Olivier Benichou,&nbsp;Ching-Yun Chang,&nbsp;Gourab Datta,&nbsp;Andrea Ferrante,&nbsp;Indrajit Ghosh,&nbsp;Brian A. Moser,&nbsp;Susan E. Sweeney,&nbsp;Jennifer Witcher,&nbsp;Matthew D. Linnik","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70014","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70014","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Venanprubart (LY3361237), an agonist antibody to B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA), was developed as a potential treatment for autoimmune disorders, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and psoriasis. We tested venanprubart in three human Phase 1 safety studies: a single ascending dose (SAD) study in healthy participants (1/2/5/15/50/150 mg subcutaneously, or 150/400 mg intravenously; n = 64), a multiple ascending dose study in patients with SLE (six doses every 2 weeks at 50/150/450 mg subcutaneously; n = 28), and a randomized controlled study in patients with psoriasis (six doses every 2 weeks at 450 mg subcutaneously; n = 24). Key endpoints across studies included safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, receptor occupancy of BTLA on B cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and immunogenicity as measured by treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies (TE ADA). Venanprubart was well tolerated in healthy participants and in patients with SLE and psoriasis. No participants discontinued treatment due to adverse events, and nearly all treatment-emergent events were mild or moderate. The pharmacokinetic profile of venanprubart was nonlinear. Serum concentrations of venanprubart increased greater than dose proportionally at lower doses, but exposure became more linear after target binding was nearly saturated. Higher doses led to high levels of receptor occupancy on B cells, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells, indicating a high level of target engagement. Irrespective of titer, TE ADA incidence was 79%, 71%, and 71% for healthy participants, patients with SLE, and patients with psoriasis, respectively. ADA titers were lower in the repeat-dose studies compared to the SAD study, especially at higher doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.70014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of High-Fat Food on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Amlodipine/Benazepril in Healthy Chinese Participants 高脂肪食物对氨氯地平/苯那普利在中国健康受试者体内药动学及安全性的影响
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70022
Congyang Ding, Haojing Song, Bo Qiu, Xue Sun, Caihui Guo, Wanjun Bai, Huizhen Wu, Zhanjun Dong

This study assessed the effect of high-fat food on pharmacokinetics and safety of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat in healthy Chinese participants under fasting and fed conditions from a bioequivalence trial. This trial enrolled a total of 92 healthy participants, and there was a significant difference in age between fasting and fed trials (P = .006). These participants received an amlodipine/benazepril capsule containing 5 mg amlodipine and 10 mg benazepril each period with a 21-day washout under fasting or fed conditions. Twenty-four blood samples were obtained from baseline to 168 h after drug administration for pharmacokinetic analyses. The plasma concentrations of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat were determined by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. After controlling for age, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) or Quade’s ANCOVA of pharmacokinetic results indicated that a high-fat meal did not significantly influence the primary pharmacokinetic parameters of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat, except for the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and time to reach maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) for benazepril and benazeprilat. The high-fat food decreased Cmax of benazepril by 64.1% and Cmax of benazeprilat by 30.8%, and increased Tmax of benazepril by 408.2% and Tmax of benazeprilat by 167.8% The incidence of most frequently observed AE of hypotension was significantly different (P = .014, risk ratio = 2.286, and 95% confidence intervals 1.103 to 4.737) under fasting and fed conditions. It suggested that high-fat food containing 800 to 1000 kcal might be the risk factor for healthy Chinese participants taking amlodipine/benazepril capsules.

本研究通过生物等效性试验评估了高脂肪食物对氨氯地平、苯那普利和苯那普利在空腹和进食条件下的药代动力学和安全性的影响。该试验共招募了92名健康参与者,禁食试验和喂养试验在年龄上存在显著差异(P = 0.006)。这些参与者在禁食或进食条件下,每个周期服用含有5mg氨氯地平和10mg苯那普利的氨氯地平/苯那普利胶囊,为期21天。从基线至给药后168 h采集24份血样进行药代动力学分析。采用高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定氨氯地平、苯那普利和苯那普利的血药浓度。在控制年龄后,药代动力学结果的协方差分析(ANCOVA)或Quade's ANCOVA表明,高脂肪膳食对氨氯地平、苯那普利和苯那普利的主要药代动力学参数,除了苯那普利和苯那普利的最大血药浓度(Cmax)和达到最大血药浓度(Tmax)的时间有影响外,均无显著影响。高脂肪食物使苯那普利的Cmax和苯那普利的Cmax分别降低64.1%和30.8%,使苯那普利的Tmax和苯那普利的Tmax分别升高408.2%和167.8%。在空腹和空腹条件下,最常见的低血压AE的发生率有显著差异(P = 0.014,风险比= 2.286,95%可信区间为1.103 ~ 4.737)。这表明含有800至1000千卡的高脂肪食物可能是健康的中国参与者服用氨氯地平/苯那普利胶囊的危险因素。
{"title":"Effect of High-Fat Food on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Amlodipine/Benazepril in Healthy Chinese Participants","authors":"Congyang Ding,&nbsp;Haojing Song,&nbsp;Bo Qiu,&nbsp;Xue Sun,&nbsp;Caihui Guo,&nbsp;Wanjun Bai,&nbsp;Huizhen Wu,&nbsp;Zhanjun Dong","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70022","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70022","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study assessed the effect of high-fat food on pharmacokinetics and safety of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat in healthy Chinese participants under fasting and fed conditions from a bioequivalence trial. This trial enrolled a total of 92 healthy participants, and there was a significant difference in age between fasting and fed trials (<i>P</i> = .006). These participants received an amlodipine/benazepril capsule containing 5 mg amlodipine and 10 mg benazepril each period with a 21-day washout under fasting or fed conditions. Twenty-four blood samples were obtained from baseline to 168 h after drug administration for pharmacokinetic analyses. The plasma concentrations of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat were determined by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. After controlling for age, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) or <i>Quade</i>’s ANCOVA of pharmacokinetic results indicated that a high-fat meal did not significantly influence the primary pharmacokinetic parameters of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat, except for the maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) and time to reach maximum plasma concentration (T<sub>max</sub>) for benazepril and benazeprilat. The high-fat food decreased C<sub>max</sub> of benazepril by 64.1% and C<sub>max</sub> of benazeprilat by 30.8%, and increased T<sub>max</sub> of benazepril by 408.2% and T<sub>max</sub> of benazeprilat by 167.8% The incidence of most frequently observed AE of hypotension was significantly different (<i>P</i> = .014, risk ratio = 2.286, and 95% confidence intervals 1.103 to 4.737) under fasting and fed conditions. It suggested that high-fat food containing 800 to 1000 kcal might be the risk factor for healthy Chinese participants taking amlodipine/benazepril capsules.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Assessment of the Intestinal CYP3A Contribution to Drug Interactions with Extended-Release Tacrolimus (LCPT) Using Grapefruit Juice 肠道CYP3A对葡萄柚汁缓释他克莫司(LCPT)药物相互作用的影响
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70016
Adekunle Alabi, Janice S. Kerr, Mita Shah, Adnan Khan, Joseph D. Ma, Raymond T. Suhandynata, Jeremiah D. Momper, Shirley M. Tsunoda

Grapefruit juice (GFJ) is a known inhibitor of intestinal cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) metabolism leading to increased exposure to CYP3A substrates such as tacrolimus. The extended-release tacrolimus formulation Envarsus (LCPT) exhibits prolonged absorption throughout the entire GI tract. Although a clinically significant drug–drug interaction occurs with immediate-release tacrolimus formulations, this has not been evaluated with extended-release formulations. This study assessed the impact of GFJ on LCPT in adult kidney transplant patients. Eleven adult kidney transplant recipients on a stable dose of LCPT were enrolled in a randomized crossover study. Participants were administered either GFJ or water during each pharmacokinetic visit, with midazolam used as a positive control. A washout period of 2–4 weeks was included between visits. Tacrolimus concentrations were determined using validated LC-MS/MS methods. Tacrolimus AUC0–24 was 28% higher with GFJ (GMR = 1.28, 90% CI 1.12–1.44) and Cmax was 73% higher (GMR = 1.73, 90% CI 1.46–2.00) compared to control. GFJ exhibited a clinically meaningful interaction with LCPT. However, the magnitude appears less than those reported with immediate-release formulations, suggesting the extended absorption profile of LCPT may affect susceptibility to drug interactions in the intestine.

葡萄柚汁(GFJ)是一种已知的肠道细胞色素P450 3A (CYP3A)代谢抑制剂,导致CYP3A底物(如他克莫司)暴露增加。缓释他克莫司制剂Envarsus (LCPT)在整个胃肠道中表现出延长的吸收。尽管临床显著的药物-药物相互作用发生在速释他克莫司制剂中,但尚未对缓释制剂进行评估。本研究评估了GFJ对成人肾移植患者LCPT的影响。11名接受稳定剂量LCPT的成人肾移植受者被纳入一项随机交叉研究。在每次药代动力学访问期间,参与者被给予GFJ或水,咪达唑仑作为阳性对照。两次访问之间有2-4周的洗脱期。采用经验证的LC-MS/MS方法测定他克莫司浓度。他克莫司AUC0-24与对照组相比,GFJ升高28% (GMR = 1.28, 90% CI 1.12-1.44), Cmax升高73% (GMR = 1.73, 90% CI 1.46-2.00)。GFJ与LCPT表现出有临床意义的相互作用。然而,其强度似乎小于速释制剂,这表明LCPT的延长吸收可能会影响肠内药物相互作用的敏感性。
{"title":"Assessment of the Intestinal CYP3A Contribution to Drug Interactions with Extended-Release Tacrolimus (LCPT) Using Grapefruit Juice","authors":"Adekunle Alabi,&nbsp;Janice S. Kerr,&nbsp;Mita Shah,&nbsp;Adnan Khan,&nbsp;Joseph D. Ma,&nbsp;Raymond T. Suhandynata,&nbsp;Jeremiah D. Momper,&nbsp;Shirley M. Tsunoda","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70016","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70016","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Grapefruit juice (GFJ) is a known inhibitor of intestinal cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) metabolism leading to increased exposure to CYP3A substrates such as tacrolimus. The extended-release tacrolimus formulation Envarsus (LCPT) exhibits prolonged absorption throughout the entire GI tract. Although a clinically significant drug–drug interaction occurs with immediate-release tacrolimus formulations, this has not been evaluated with extended-release formulations. This study assessed the impact of GFJ on LCPT in adult kidney transplant patients. Eleven adult kidney transplant recipients on a stable dose of LCPT were enrolled in a randomized crossover study. Participants were administered either GFJ or water during each pharmacokinetic visit, with midazolam used as a positive control. A washout period of 2–4 weeks was included between visits. Tacrolimus concentrations were determined using validated LC-MS/MS methods. Tacrolimus AUC<sub>0–24</sub> was 28% higher with GFJ (GMR = 1.28, 90% CI 1.12–1.44) and C<sub>max</sub> was 73% higher (GMR = 1.73, 90% CI 1.46–2.00) compared to control. GFJ exhibited a clinically meaningful interaction with LCPT. However, the magnitude appears less than those reported with immediate-release formulations, suggesting the extended absorption profile of LCPT may affect susceptibility to drug interactions in the intestine.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.70016","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
From Reflection to Acceleration: Clinical Pharmacology’s 2025 Lessons and 2026 Opportunities 从反思到加速:临床药理学2025的教训和2026的机遇。
IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-01-19 DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.70012
Amalia M. Issa
<p>As we draw the curtain on 2025 and turn our gaze toward 2026, it is my pleasure to offer this year-in-review and forward-looking editorial on the evolving discipline of clinical pharmacology. The year 2025 has been pivotal for clinical pharmacology: a year when computational innovation, mechanistic modeling, and precision medicine coalesced to fundamentally re-shape drug development. Several themes dominated the landscape, both in our journal's publications and across the broader field. As we enter 2026, it is an opportune moment to reflect on the remarkable transformation clinical pharmacology has undergone in 2025, and to begin a conversation about the year ahead.</p><p>Beginning with this issue, <i>Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development</i> transitions to a continuous publication model. Rather than batching articles into discrete monthly issues, accepted manuscripts will now be published online immediately upon final preparation. This approach offers multiple advantages for our authors and readers: accelerated dissemination of findings and enhanced discoverability through earlier indexing.</p><p>Continuous publication aligns with broader trends in scholarly communication toward real-time knowledge sharing.<span><sup>1</sup></span> As digital platforms increasingly dominate academic publishing, the traditional issue-based model becomes less relevant to how researchers actually access and utilize the literature.<span><sup>2</sup></span> We believe this transition will enhance the impact and accessibility of research published in our journal while maintaining the rigorous peer review standards that define <i>Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development</i>.</p><p>Model-informed drug development (MIDD) achieved demonstrable maturation in 2025.<span><sup>3</sup></span> The publication by Sahasrabudhe and colleagues in <i>Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics</i> provided compelling quantitative evidence that systematic MIDD application yields average savings of approximately 10 months in development cycle time and $5 million per program.<span><sup>4</sup></span> These are not theoretical projections but empirical findings from retrospective portfolio analysis that offer concrete validation of MIDD's value proposition.</p><p>Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, in particular, emerged as an indispensable tool. The FDA workshop on “Advances in PBPK Modeling and its Regulatory Utility for Oral Drug Product Development,” summarized by Cheng et al.<span><sup>5</sup></span> highlighted both the successes and persistent challenges in utilizing PBPK for generic drug development and bioequivalence assessments.</p><p>Our own journal contributed important work in this area. Studies examining pharmacokinetic variability across special populations, drug–drug interactions, and first-in-human dose escalation protocols published throughout 2025 in <i>Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development</i> exemplified the practical application of quant
当我们拉开2025年的帷幕,将目光投向2026年,我很高兴就临床药理学这一不断发展的学科提供今年的回顾和前瞻性社论。2025年对临床药理学来说是关键的一年:计算创新、机制建模和精准医学结合在一起,从根本上重塑了药物开发。在我们期刊的出版物和更广泛的领域中,有几个主题占据了主导地位。当我们进入2026年,这是一个恰当的时机来反思临床药理学在2025年所经历的显著转变,并开始讨论未来的一年。从本期开始,药物开发中的临床药理学转变为连续出版模式。现在,接受的手稿将在最后准备后立即在线发布,而不是将文章分批分成离散的每月一期。这种方法为我们的作者和读者提供了多重优势:通过早期索引加速发现的传播和增强可发现性。持续出版符合学术交流向实时知识共享的更广泛趋势随着数字平台日益主导学术出版,传统的基于问题的模型与研究人员如何实际访问和利用文献变得越来越不相关我们相信这一转变将增强我们期刊上发表的研究的影响力和可及性,同时保持严格的同行评审标准,这些标准定义了药物开发中的临床药理学。基于模型的药物开发(MIDD)在2025年实现了明显的成熟。Sahasrabudhe及其同事在《临床药理学与治疗学》杂志上发表的论文提供了令人信服的定量证据,表明系统的MIDD应用平均节省了大约10个月的开发周期时间,每个项目节省了500万美元这些不是理论预测,而是来自回顾性投资组合分析的实证发现,为MIDD的价值主张提供了具体的验证。特别是基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)模型,成为不可或缺的工具。Cheng等人总结的FDA研讨会“PBPK模型的进展及其在口服药物产品开发中的监管效用”5强调了在仿制药开发和生物等效性评估中利用PBPK的成功和持续的挑战。我们自己的期刊在这一领域做出了重要贡献。《药物开发中的临床药理学》杂志于2025年发表了关于特殊人群药代动力学变异性、药物相互作用和首次人体剂量递增方案的研究,这些研究举例说明了定量药理学原理在现实世界药物开发挑战中的实际应用。2025年,也许没有什么发展比将人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)整合到药物开发工作流程中更能吸引我们这个领域的想象力(以及审查)。FDA于2025年1月发布了具有里程碑意义的指导文件《使用人工智能支持药物和生物制品监管决策的考虑》,标志着监管部门接受这些技术的关键时刻该指南建立了一个基于风险的可信度评估框架,以平衡创新与稳健验证的需要。人工智能对药物开发时间表的实际影响已经开始成为现实人工智能正在从理论概念过渡到制度现实,主要制药公司嵌入“实验室在循环”方法,迭代地将实验数据与ML算法结合起来,以加速目标识别和领先优势优化。8然而,正如Kant等人适当警告的那样,在算法可解释性、数据质量要求和潜在的计算偏差方面仍然存在重大挑战。作为临床药理学家,我们有责任确保人工智能应用在强大的临床终点上得到验证,而不仅仅是优化替代措施。人工智能的整合必须加强而不是取代对药物作用的机制理解。药物基因组学的前景终于实现了有意义的临床牵引。2025年,我们见证了包括新加坡和泰国在内的几个国家在卡马西平开始使用前实施国家级HLA-B*15:02筛查计划,显著减少了严重的皮肤不良反应。多组学数据与先进计算模型的集成不断发展。庄在《医学前沿》上的分析探讨了如何利用人工智能方法合成基因组学、转录组学、蛋白质组学和代谢组学,从而更全面地了解药物反应变异性。 临床基因组资源(ClinGen)药物基因组学工作组评估基因药物临床有效性的框架是将基因组学见解转化为实践的关键基础设施。然而,在医疗保健系统中,药物基因组学的实施仍然存在显著差异,国际政策的协调仍然是一个迫切的优先事项。随着我们进入2026年和未来,我们必须接受大多数药物反应表型的多基因复杂性。将真实世界的证据与药物基因组学分析相结合,对于不断完善治疗方案和减少临床处方中仍然存在的试错方法至关重要。2025年的临床药理学在将计算创新和机制理解转化为药物开发效率和患者护理的切实改善方面取得了显著进展。人工智能、MIDD和精准医疗的融合不仅代表了渐进的进步,而且代表了治疗优化的根本转变。随着我们进入2026年,我们的责任是确保这些强大的工具在科学严谨、伦理考虑和坚定不移地关注患者利益的情况下得到应用。挑战是巨大的。我们必须对数据质量、算法透明度、公平获取和监管协调保持警惕。然而,我们共同致力于推进合理的、循证的药物治疗优化也是强大的。我提请大家注意Kruse及其同事在《欧洲临床药理学杂志》上发表的观点,该文对临床药理学如何影响药物开发过程提供了有价值的见解,强调了该学科在现代药物科学中的核心作用他们的分析强调,临床药理学信息占药品标签内容的50%,证明了该领域的根本重要性。过渡到持续出版的临床药理学在药物开发标志着我们的承诺,以保持与该领域的快速发展的步伐。我们将继续为早期研究、首次人体研究和负面发现提供一个独特的论坛,为药物开发企业提供必要的知识。临床药理学的未来不是要在传统方法和新兴技术之间做出选择,而是要深思熟虑地整合这些能力,以服务于我们的基本使命:确保正确的患者在正确的时间以正确的剂量接受正确的药物。这一使命将指导我们在2026年及以后的工作。对于在世界各地的工业、学术界、监管机构和合同研究组织工作的许多临床药理学家:你们是药物开发的无名英雄。你将药物行为的科学转化为剂量策略,你塑造首次人体受试者的安全招募,你驾驭药物-药物相互作用的复杂性,你利用建模来优化试验,最终你帮助确保药物在正确的时间以正确的剂量为正确的患者实现其承诺。在这个快速变化的时代,新模式、人工智能/机器学习、全球试验和精确给药,比以往任何时候都更需要你的专业知识。让我们继续突破界限,同时保持基本的严谨性、健全的PK/PD原则、健全的研究设计、透明的报告和道德行为。我衷心感谢《药物开发中的临床药理学》的众多作者、审稿人和读者。你们的贡献保持了期刊的活力和学科的进步。感谢您一直以来的信任,也感谢您选择《药物开发中的临床药理学》作为您的出版基地。在迈向2026年之际,让我们拥抱未来的机遇:更快的传播、更丰富的建模工具、更广泛的全球参与,以及更深层次的以患者为中心。我祝大家新年快乐、健康、富有成效。愿它带来新的见解、合作和突破。我们期待您继续为药物开发中的临床药理学和该领域的进步做出贡献。2026年快乐!作者声明无利益冲突。这项工作没有获得资金。数据共享不适用于本文,因为在当前研究中没有生成或分析数据集。
{"title":"From Reflection to Acceleration: Clinical Pharmacology’s 2025 Lessons and 2026 Opportunities","authors":"Amalia M. Issa","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70012","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70012","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;As we draw the curtain on 2025 and turn our gaze toward 2026, it is my pleasure to offer this year-in-review and forward-looking editorial on the evolving discipline of clinical pharmacology. The year 2025 has been pivotal for clinical pharmacology: a year when computational innovation, mechanistic modeling, and precision medicine coalesced to fundamentally re-shape drug development. Several themes dominated the landscape, both in our journal's publications and across the broader field. As we enter 2026, it is an opportune moment to reflect on the remarkable transformation clinical pharmacology has undergone in 2025, and to begin a conversation about the year ahead.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Beginning with this issue, &lt;i&gt;Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development&lt;/i&gt; transitions to a continuous publication model. Rather than batching articles into discrete monthly issues, accepted manuscripts will now be published online immediately upon final preparation. This approach offers multiple advantages for our authors and readers: accelerated dissemination of findings and enhanced discoverability through earlier indexing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Continuous publication aligns with broader trends in scholarly communication toward real-time knowledge sharing.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; As digital platforms increasingly dominate academic publishing, the traditional issue-based model becomes less relevant to how researchers actually access and utilize the literature.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; We believe this transition will enhance the impact and accessibility of research published in our journal while maintaining the rigorous peer review standards that define &lt;i&gt;Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Model-informed drug development (MIDD) achieved demonstrable maturation in 2025.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The publication by Sahasrabudhe and colleagues in &lt;i&gt;Clinical Pharmacology &amp; Therapeutics&lt;/i&gt; provided compelling quantitative evidence that systematic MIDD application yields average savings of approximately 10 months in development cycle time and $5 million per program.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; These are not theoretical projections but empirical findings from retrospective portfolio analysis that offer concrete validation of MIDD's value proposition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, in particular, emerged as an indispensable tool. The FDA workshop on “Advances in PBPK Modeling and its Regulatory Utility for Oral Drug Product Development,” summarized by Cheng et al.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;5&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; highlighted both the successes and persistent challenges in utilizing PBPK for generic drug development and bioequivalence assessments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Our own journal contributed important work in this area. Studies examining pharmacokinetic variability across special populations, drug–drug interactions, and first-in-human dose escalation protocols published throughout 2025 in &lt;i&gt;Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development&lt;/i&gt; exemplified the practical application of quant","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.70012","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1