Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development最新文献

A fixed-dose combination (FDC) of ezetimibe, atorvastatin, and amlodipine has been developed to improve medication adherence among patients with cardiovascular diseases. In a randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, fixed-sequence study involving 34 participants (Study 1), the potential drug-drug interaction between ezetimibe/atorvastatin FDC and amlodipine was evaluated. Additionally, a randomized, open-label, crossover study with 60 participants (Study 2) compared the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of ezetimibe/atorvastatin/amlodipine FDC to those of individual formulations. Co-administration of the ezetimibe/atorvastatin FDC and amlodipine did not significantly alter the PKs of either drug. However, amlodipine resulted in a slight increase in systemic exposure to atorvastatin by approximately 23%. Geometric mean ratios (FDC to individual formulations) and 90% confidence intervals of area under the time-concentration curve at steady state during dosing interval (AUC_{τ, ss}) and maximum concentration at steady state (C_{max, ss}) or amlodipine, atorvastatin, and ezetimibe were all within the bioequivalent range (0.8-1.25), confirming bioequivalence. Moreover, the FDC of ezetimibe, atorvastatin, and amlodipine exhibited comparable tolerability to corresponding individual formulations.

Two trials were performed to evaluate the effect of renal and hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of pritelivir and its metabolites. The renal impairment trial included subjects with mild, moderate, and severe impairment, while the hepatic impairment trial included subjects with moderate impairment. Both trials recruited a matched control group of healthy subjects. Following a single oral dose of 100 mg of pritelivir, mild and moderate renal impairment and moderate hepatic impairment did not have a clinically relevant effect on the pharmacokinetics of pritelivir. In subjects with severe renal impairment, pritelivir exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC_{0- inf}) was 57% higher compared with controls. Pritelivir plasma protein binding was similar in subjects and controls with renal impairment, while the free fraction was higher in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment, increasing unbound pritelivir exposure by 23%. For the metabolites pyridinyl phenyl acetic acid (PPA), amino thiazole sulfonamide (ATS), and PPA-acyl glucuronide, generally higher exposure was observed with increasing degree of renal impairment (ie, moderate to severe), but not with mild impairment. A modest effect of moderate hepatic impairment was observed for PPA and ATS. Pritelivir was safe and well tolerated in healthy subjects and subjects with renal or hepatic impairment.

Itepekimab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin-33, has demonstrated clinical utility in previous studies in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. An autoinjector (AI) has been developed for administering itepekimab to facilitate further development. This study compared pharmacokinetics of single 300-mg itepekimab subcutaneous administration via an AI versus a prefilled syringe (PFS). Of 90 healthy volunteers enrolled in this Phase 1, parallel-design, randomized study and stratified by body weight (50 to <70 kg, ≥70 to <80 kg, ≥80 to 100 kg) and injection site (abdomen, thigh, or arm), 84 completed the study. Systemic exposure of itepekimab was similar for both groups. Point estimates for geometric mean ratios of pharmacokinetic parameters for AI versus PFS groups were 1.01 for maximum serum concentration, 1.06 for area under the serum concentration-time curve to the last quantifiable concentration, and 1.04 for area under the serum concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity. The exposure was similar for both devices in each body weight and injection site subgroup. Overall, systemic exposure of 300-mg single-dose itepekimab in healthy participants was comparable when administered subcutaneously via an AI device and PFS, with an acceptable safety profile in both device groups.

AMPA-type glutamate receptors (AMPARs) mediate the majority of fast excitatory synaptic transmission in the mammalian brain. Ampakines, positive allosteric modulators of AMPAR, hold significant potential for the treatment of a wide range of neurological/neuropsychiatric disorders in which excitatory synaptic transmission is compromised. Low-impact ampakines are a distinct subset of ampakines that accelerate channel opening yet minimally affect receptor desensitization, which may explain their lack of seizurogenic effects at therapeutic doses in preclinical models. CX1739 is a low-impact ampakine that has shown efficacy in preclinical studies. The current clinical study examined the tolerability and pharmacokinetics of CX1739 in healthy male volunteers in a 2-part study. Part A was a single dose escalation study (100-1200 mg, 48 patients) and Part B was a multiple dose ascending study (300-600 mg BID for 7-10 days, 32 patients). CX1739 was well tolerated up to 900 mg once daily (QD) and 450 mg twice a day, with the prominent side effects being headache and nausea. Importantly, the half-life of CX1739 was 6-9 hours, and T_max was 1-5 hours. CX1739 C_max and AUC were dose-proportional. These findings thus set the stage for further explorations of this drug candidate in phase 2 clinical studies.

In the RUSTIC trial, pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity between the proposed ustekinumab biosimilar FYB202 and EU-approved (EU-Ref) and US-licensed ustekinumab (US-Ref) as well as between both reference drugs was assessed after a single 45-mg subcutaneous injection. Safety analyses comprised immunogenicity (antidrug antibodies, neutralizing antibodies), adverse events, and local tolerability. Overall, 491 healthy adults were randomized 1:1:1 and observed for up to 112 days; 486 completed the trial, and 478 were included in the PK analysis. All 3 comparisons showed PK similarity, since the 90% confidence intervals of the respective geometric mean ratios for area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity and maximum serum concentration were contained within the acceptance interval of 80%-125%. No clinically meaningful differences regarding overall safety, immunogenicity, and local tolerability were observed. Notably, after FYB202 administration, in fewer subjects at least 1 positive antidrug antibody result was observed compared to the reference groups (FYB202, 20%; EU-Ref, 42%; US-Ref, 51%). In conclusion, the RUSTIC trial demonstrated equivalent PK characteristics for FYB202 when compared to both EU-Ref and US-Ref ustekinumab and between both reference drugs. It provides the basis for the marketing authorization of FYB202, together with an extensive analytical characterization and the results of a confirmatory efficacy and safety trial in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

This single-center, randomized, open, two-preparation, single-dose, two-period, self-crossover trial aimed to assess the bioequivalence and safety of the test (T) preparation compared to the reference (R) preparation following intravenous injection in healthy subjects under fasting conditions. Twenty-four healthy subjects were enrolled in the study and subjects were randomly divided into two groups at a 1:1 ratio and were administered once per period, with an 8-day washout period. During each period, serum drug concentrations were detected for pharmacokinetic analysis and adverse events were recorded for safety analysis. The 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios (T:R) of maximum serum concentration, area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration, and area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to infinite time fell within the predefined bioequivalence range of 80%-125%, indicating bioequivalence between the T and R preparation under fasting conditions. Additionally, four subjects (16.7%) experienced five instances of adverse events in the T group, while five subjects (21.7%) experienced five instances of adverse events in the R group. This trial indicated the potential bioequivalence between the T and R products under fasting conditions, based on pharmacokinetic and safety profile.

Sotorasib is approved to be taken as 960 mg orally once daily (8 × 120-mg tablets) for the treatment of KRAS G12C-mutated nonsmall cell lung cancer. Dispersion of tablets in water could be an alternative method for patients who require a liquid formulation due to dysphagia and enteral administration. A clinical study was conducted to assess the pharmacokinetics of 960 mg of sotorasib administered as tablets and as tablets dispersed in water in healthy volunteers. Each subject received 960 mg of sotorasib by mouth, as tablets and as tablets dispersed in water on Days 1 and 4. Sotorasib median time to maximum observed plasma concentration was similar when administered as tablets and as tablets predispersed in water. The geometric least squares mean ratios (water dispersion/tablets) for area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity and maximum observed plasma concentration were 1.049 and 1.080, respectively. Sotorasib 960 mg was well tolerated. Administration of 960 mg of sotorasib as tablets predispersed in water achieved similar systemic exposures to that of sotorasib administered as oral tablets. In vitro evaluations were performed to assess the feasibility of administering sotorasib through an enteral feeding tube. Approximately 98% of sotorasib was recovered, with no new impurities, from enteral feeding tubes. Collectively, these results support that sotorasib can be administered by mouth and via enteral feeding tubes as tablets predispersed in water.