Jia-ying Wang, Wen-jun Chen, Zou-rong Ruan, Xue-hua Zhang, Jia-qiu Du, Xiao-feng Cui, Rong Shao, Dan-dan Yang, Hong-gang Lou, Bo Jiang
Stains and cholesterol absorption inhibitors are frequently co-administered in the management of dyslipidemia. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between atorvastatin and hybutimibe in healthy Chinese subjects. A randomized, open-label, three-treatment, six-period crossover study was conducted involving 24 participants. Subjects received once-daily treatments for 14 days per period (14-day washout): atorvastatin 20 mg, hybutimibe 10 mg, or their combination. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and their 90% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) of atorvastatin, hybutimibe, and their metabolites, comparing combination therapy with monotherapy. At steady state, the GMRs (90% CI) for atorvastatin were 89.9 (74.6, 108.2) for Cmax and 103.7 (96.0, 112.0) for AUC0-∞ when administered with or without hybutimibe. For total hybutimibe, the corresponding values were 120.6 (102.4, 142.0) and 105.7 (97.1, 115.2), respectively. Considering the limited PK changes and good safety profiles of both drugs, the interaction between atorvastatin and hybutimibe will likely have no significant clinical impact.
{"title":"Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Atorvastatin and Hybutimibe in Healthy Chinese Volunteers","authors":"Jia-ying Wang, Wen-jun Chen, Zou-rong Ruan, Xue-hua Zhang, Jia-qiu Du, Xiao-feng Cui, Rong Shao, Dan-dan Yang, Hong-gang Lou, Bo Jiang","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70017","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70017","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Stains and cholesterol absorption inhibitors are frequently co-administered in the management of dyslipidemia. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between atorvastatin and hybutimibe in healthy Chinese subjects. A randomized, open-label, three-treatment, six-period crossover study was conducted involving 24 participants. Subjects received once-daily treatments for 14 days per period (14-day washout): atorvastatin 20 mg, hybutimibe 10 mg, or their combination. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and their 90% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) and the area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) of atorvastatin, hybutimibe, and their metabolites, comparing combination therapy with monotherapy. At steady state, the GMRs (90% CI) for atorvastatin were 89.9 (74.6, 108.2) for C<sub>max</sub> and 103.7 (96.0, 112.0) for AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> when administered with or without hybutimibe. For total hybutimibe, the corresponding values were 120.6 (102.4, 142.0) and 105.7 (97.1, 115.2), respectively. Considering the limited PK changes and good safety profiles of both drugs, the interaction between atorvastatin and hybutimibe will likely have no significant clinical impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andrew C. Vendel, Olivier Benichou, Ching-Yun Chang, Gourab Datta, Andrea Ferrante, Indrajit Ghosh, Brian A. Moser, Susan E. Sweeney, Jennifer Witcher, Matthew D. Linnik
Venanprubart (LY3361237), an agonist antibody to B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA), was developed as a potential treatment for autoimmune disorders, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and psoriasis. We tested venanprubart in three human Phase 1 safety studies: a single ascending dose (SAD) study in healthy participants (1/2/5/15/50/150 mg subcutaneously, or 150/400 mg intravenously; n = 64), a multiple ascending dose study in patients with SLE (six doses every 2 weeks at 50/150/450 mg subcutaneously; n = 28), and a randomized controlled study in patients with psoriasis (six doses every 2 weeks at 450 mg subcutaneously; n = 24). Key endpoints across studies included safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, receptor occupancy of BTLA on B cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and immunogenicity as measured by treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies (TE ADA). Venanprubart was well tolerated in healthy participants and in patients with SLE and psoriasis. No participants discontinued treatment due to adverse events, and nearly all treatment-emergent events were mild or moderate. The pharmacokinetic profile of venanprubart was nonlinear. Serum concentrations of venanprubart increased greater than dose proportionally at lower doses, but exposure became more linear after target binding was nearly saturated. Higher doses led to high levels of receptor occupancy on B cells, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells, indicating a high level of target engagement. Irrespective of titer, TE ADA incidence was 79%, 71%, and 71% for healthy participants, patients with SLE, and patients with psoriasis, respectively. ADA titers were lower in the repeat-dose studies compared to the SAD study, especially at higher doses.
{"title":"Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of a BTLA Agonist Antibody (Venanprubart) in Healthy Participants, Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, and Patients with Psoriasis: Results From Three Phase 1 Studies","authors":"Andrew C. Vendel, Olivier Benichou, Ching-Yun Chang, Gourab Datta, Andrea Ferrante, Indrajit Ghosh, Brian A. Moser, Susan E. Sweeney, Jennifer Witcher, Matthew D. Linnik","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70014","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70014","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Venanprubart (LY3361237), an agonist antibody to B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA), was developed as a potential treatment for autoimmune disorders, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and psoriasis. We tested venanprubart in three human Phase 1 safety studies: a single ascending dose (SAD) study in healthy participants (1/2/5/15/50/150 mg subcutaneously, or 150/400 mg intravenously; n = 64), a multiple ascending dose study in patients with SLE (six doses every 2 weeks at 50/150/450 mg subcutaneously; n = 28), and a randomized controlled study in patients with psoriasis (six doses every 2 weeks at 450 mg subcutaneously; n = 24). Key endpoints across studies included safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, receptor occupancy of BTLA on B cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and immunogenicity as measured by treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies (TE ADA). Venanprubart was well tolerated in healthy participants and in patients with SLE and psoriasis. No participants discontinued treatment due to adverse events, and nearly all treatment-emergent events were mild or moderate. The pharmacokinetic profile of venanprubart was nonlinear. Serum concentrations of venanprubart increased greater than dose proportionally at lower doses, but exposure became more linear after target binding was nearly saturated. Higher doses led to high levels of receptor occupancy on B cells, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells, indicating a high level of target engagement. Irrespective of titer, TE ADA incidence was 79%, 71%, and 71% for healthy participants, patients with SLE, and patients with psoriasis, respectively. ADA titers were lower in the repeat-dose studies compared to the SAD study, especially at higher doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.70014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study assessed the effect of high-fat food on pharmacokinetics and safety of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat in healthy Chinese participants under fasting and fed conditions from a bioequivalence trial. This trial enrolled a total of 92 healthy participants, and there was a significant difference in age between fasting and fed trials (P = .006). These participants received an amlodipine/benazepril capsule containing 5 mg amlodipine and 10 mg benazepril each period with a 21-day washout under fasting or fed conditions. Twenty-four blood samples were obtained from baseline to 168 h after drug administration for pharmacokinetic analyses. The plasma concentrations of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat were determined by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. After controlling for age, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) or Quade’s ANCOVA of pharmacokinetic results indicated that a high-fat meal did not significantly influence the primary pharmacokinetic parameters of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat, except for the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and time to reach maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) for benazepril and benazeprilat. The high-fat food decreased Cmax of benazepril by 64.1% and Cmax of benazeprilat by 30.8%, and increased Tmax of benazepril by 408.2% and Tmax of benazeprilat by 167.8% The incidence of most frequently observed AE of hypotension was significantly different (P = .014, risk ratio = 2.286, and 95% confidence intervals 1.103 to 4.737) under fasting and fed conditions. It suggested that high-fat food containing 800 to 1000 kcal might be the risk factor for healthy Chinese participants taking amlodipine/benazepril capsules.
{"title":"Effect of High-Fat Food on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Amlodipine/Benazepril in Healthy Chinese Participants","authors":"Congyang Ding, Haojing Song, Bo Qiu, Xue Sun, Caihui Guo, Wanjun Bai, Huizhen Wu, Zhanjun Dong","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70022","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70022","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study assessed the effect of high-fat food on pharmacokinetics and safety of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat in healthy Chinese participants under fasting and fed conditions from a bioequivalence trial. This trial enrolled a total of 92 healthy participants, and there was a significant difference in age between fasting and fed trials (<i>P</i> = .006). These participants received an amlodipine/benazepril capsule containing 5 mg amlodipine and 10 mg benazepril each period with a 21-day washout under fasting or fed conditions. Twenty-four blood samples were obtained from baseline to 168 h after drug administration for pharmacokinetic analyses. The plasma concentrations of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat were determined by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. After controlling for age, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) or <i>Quade</i>’s ANCOVA of pharmacokinetic results indicated that a high-fat meal did not significantly influence the primary pharmacokinetic parameters of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat, except for the maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) and time to reach maximum plasma concentration (T<sub>max</sub>) for benazepril and benazeprilat. The high-fat food decreased C<sub>max</sub> of benazepril by 64.1% and C<sub>max</sub> of benazeprilat by 30.8%, and increased T<sub>max</sub> of benazepril by 408.2% and T<sub>max</sub> of benazeprilat by 167.8% The incidence of most frequently observed AE of hypotension was significantly different (<i>P</i> = .014, risk ratio = 2.286, and 95% confidence intervals 1.103 to 4.737) under fasting and fed conditions. It suggested that high-fat food containing 800 to 1000 kcal might be the risk factor for healthy Chinese participants taking amlodipine/benazepril capsules.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Adekunle Alabi, Janice S. Kerr, Mita Shah, Adnan Khan, Joseph D. Ma, Raymond T. Suhandynata, Jeremiah D. Momper, Shirley M. Tsunoda
Grapefruit juice (GFJ) is a known inhibitor of intestinal cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) metabolism leading to increased exposure to CYP3A substrates such as tacrolimus. The extended-release tacrolimus formulation Envarsus (LCPT) exhibits prolonged absorption throughout the entire GI tract. Although a clinically significant drug–drug interaction occurs with immediate-release tacrolimus formulations, this has not been evaluated with extended-release formulations. This study assessed the impact of GFJ on LCPT in adult kidney transplant patients. Eleven adult kidney transplant recipients on a stable dose of LCPT were enrolled in a randomized crossover study. Participants were administered either GFJ or water during each pharmacokinetic visit, with midazolam used as a positive control. A washout period of 2–4 weeks was included between visits. Tacrolimus concentrations were determined using validated LC-MS/MS methods. Tacrolimus AUC0–24 was 28% higher with GFJ (GMR = 1.28, 90% CI 1.12–1.44) and Cmax was 73% higher (GMR = 1.73, 90% CI 1.46–2.00) compared to control. GFJ exhibited a clinically meaningful interaction with LCPT. However, the magnitude appears less than those reported with immediate-release formulations, suggesting the extended absorption profile of LCPT may affect susceptibility to drug interactions in the intestine.
葡萄柚汁(GFJ)是一种已知的肠道细胞色素P450 3A (CYP3A)代谢抑制剂,导致CYP3A底物(如他克莫司)暴露增加。缓释他克莫司制剂Envarsus (LCPT)在整个胃肠道中表现出延长的吸收。尽管临床显著的药物-药物相互作用发生在速释他克莫司制剂中,但尚未对缓释制剂进行评估。本研究评估了GFJ对成人肾移植患者LCPT的影响。11名接受稳定剂量LCPT的成人肾移植受者被纳入一项随机交叉研究。在每次药代动力学访问期间,参与者被给予GFJ或水,咪达唑仑作为阳性对照。两次访问之间有2-4周的洗脱期。采用经验证的LC-MS/MS方法测定他克莫司浓度。他克莫司AUC0-24与对照组相比,GFJ升高28% (GMR = 1.28, 90% CI 1.12-1.44), Cmax升高73% (GMR = 1.73, 90% CI 1.46-2.00)。GFJ与LCPT表现出有临床意义的相互作用。然而,其强度似乎小于速释制剂,这表明LCPT的延长吸收可能会影响肠内药物相互作用的敏感性。
{"title":"Assessment of the Intestinal CYP3A Contribution to Drug Interactions with Extended-Release Tacrolimus (LCPT) Using Grapefruit Juice","authors":"Adekunle Alabi, Janice S. Kerr, Mita Shah, Adnan Khan, Joseph D. Ma, Raymond T. Suhandynata, Jeremiah D. Momper, Shirley M. Tsunoda","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70016","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70016","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Grapefruit juice (GFJ) is a known inhibitor of intestinal cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) metabolism leading to increased exposure to CYP3A substrates such as tacrolimus. The extended-release tacrolimus formulation Envarsus (LCPT) exhibits prolonged absorption throughout the entire GI tract. Although a clinically significant drug–drug interaction occurs with immediate-release tacrolimus formulations, this has not been evaluated with extended-release formulations. This study assessed the impact of GFJ on LCPT in adult kidney transplant patients. Eleven adult kidney transplant recipients on a stable dose of LCPT were enrolled in a randomized crossover study. Participants were administered either GFJ or water during each pharmacokinetic visit, with midazolam used as a positive control. A washout period of 2–4 weeks was included between visits. Tacrolimus concentrations were determined using validated LC-MS/MS methods. Tacrolimus AUC<sub>0–24</sub> was 28% higher with GFJ (GMR = 1.28, 90% CI 1.12–1.44) and C<sub>max</sub> was 73% higher (GMR = 1.73, 90% CI 1.46–2.00) compared to control. GFJ exhibited a clinically meaningful interaction with LCPT. However, the magnitude appears less than those reported with immediate-release formulations, suggesting the extended absorption profile of LCPT may affect susceptibility to drug interactions in the intestine.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.70016","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>As we draw the curtain on 2025 and turn our gaze toward 2026, it is my pleasure to offer this year-in-review and forward-looking editorial on the evolving discipline of clinical pharmacology. The year 2025 has been pivotal for clinical pharmacology: a year when computational innovation, mechanistic modeling, and precision medicine coalesced to fundamentally re-shape drug development. Several themes dominated the landscape, both in our journal's publications and across the broader field. As we enter 2026, it is an opportune moment to reflect on the remarkable transformation clinical pharmacology has undergone in 2025, and to begin a conversation about the year ahead.</p><p>Beginning with this issue, <i>Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development</i> transitions to a continuous publication model. Rather than batching articles into discrete monthly issues, accepted manuscripts will now be published online immediately upon final preparation. This approach offers multiple advantages for our authors and readers: accelerated dissemination of findings and enhanced discoverability through earlier indexing.</p><p>Continuous publication aligns with broader trends in scholarly communication toward real-time knowledge sharing.<span><sup>1</sup></span> As digital platforms increasingly dominate academic publishing, the traditional issue-based model becomes less relevant to how researchers actually access and utilize the literature.<span><sup>2</sup></span> We believe this transition will enhance the impact and accessibility of research published in our journal while maintaining the rigorous peer review standards that define <i>Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development</i>.</p><p>Model-informed drug development (MIDD) achieved demonstrable maturation in 2025.<span><sup>3</sup></span> The publication by Sahasrabudhe and colleagues in <i>Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics</i> provided compelling quantitative evidence that systematic MIDD application yields average savings of approximately 10 months in development cycle time and $5 million per program.<span><sup>4</sup></span> These are not theoretical projections but empirical findings from retrospective portfolio analysis that offer concrete validation of MIDD's value proposition.</p><p>Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, in particular, emerged as an indispensable tool. The FDA workshop on “Advances in PBPK Modeling and its Regulatory Utility for Oral Drug Product Development,” summarized by Cheng et al.<span><sup>5</sup></span> highlighted both the successes and persistent challenges in utilizing PBPK for generic drug development and bioequivalence assessments.</p><p>Our own journal contributed important work in this area. Studies examining pharmacokinetic variability across special populations, drug–drug interactions, and first-in-human dose escalation protocols published throughout 2025 in <i>Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development</i> exemplified the practical application of quant
{"title":"From Reflection to Acceleration: Clinical Pharmacology’s 2025 Lessons and 2026 Opportunities","authors":"Amalia M. Issa","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70012","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70012","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As we draw the curtain on 2025 and turn our gaze toward 2026, it is my pleasure to offer this year-in-review and forward-looking editorial on the evolving discipline of clinical pharmacology. The year 2025 has been pivotal for clinical pharmacology: a year when computational innovation, mechanistic modeling, and precision medicine coalesced to fundamentally re-shape drug development. Several themes dominated the landscape, both in our journal's publications and across the broader field. As we enter 2026, it is an opportune moment to reflect on the remarkable transformation clinical pharmacology has undergone in 2025, and to begin a conversation about the year ahead.</p><p>Beginning with this issue, <i>Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development</i> transitions to a continuous publication model. Rather than batching articles into discrete monthly issues, accepted manuscripts will now be published online immediately upon final preparation. This approach offers multiple advantages for our authors and readers: accelerated dissemination of findings and enhanced discoverability through earlier indexing.</p><p>Continuous publication aligns with broader trends in scholarly communication toward real-time knowledge sharing.<span><sup>1</sup></span> As digital platforms increasingly dominate academic publishing, the traditional issue-based model becomes less relevant to how researchers actually access and utilize the literature.<span><sup>2</sup></span> We believe this transition will enhance the impact and accessibility of research published in our journal while maintaining the rigorous peer review standards that define <i>Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development</i>.</p><p>Model-informed drug development (MIDD) achieved demonstrable maturation in 2025.<span><sup>3</sup></span> The publication by Sahasrabudhe and colleagues in <i>Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics</i> provided compelling quantitative evidence that systematic MIDD application yields average savings of approximately 10 months in development cycle time and $5 million per program.<span><sup>4</sup></span> These are not theoretical projections but empirical findings from retrospective portfolio analysis that offer concrete validation of MIDD's value proposition.</p><p>Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, in particular, emerged as an indispensable tool. The FDA workshop on “Advances in PBPK Modeling and its Regulatory Utility for Oral Drug Product Development,” summarized by Cheng et al.<span><sup>5</sup></span> highlighted both the successes and persistent challenges in utilizing PBPK for generic drug development and bioequivalence assessments.</p><p>Our own journal contributed important work in this area. Studies examining pharmacokinetic variability across special populations, drug–drug interactions, and first-in-human dose escalation protocols published throughout 2025 in <i>Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development</i> exemplified the practical application of quant","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.70012","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence, and safety of domestic diclofenac sodium sustained-release tablets (0.1 g) and a reference formulation in healthy Chinese subjects. Two independent trials (fasting and fed conditions) were conducted with a single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-sequence, four-period, fully replicated design. Plasma diclofenac concentrations were determined by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated via a noncompartmental model using Phoenix WinNonlin software (version 7.0). Multivariate analysis of variance was performed on the natural logarithm-transformed pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞) of the test and reference formulations using a mixed linear model. Average bioequivalence (ABE) was used for assessment if the within-subject variability (SWR) of the reference formulation was < 0.294; otherwise, reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) was applied. In the fasting trial, the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric least-squares mean ratios of Cmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞ (test/reference) were 82.35%−106.55%, 99.77%−105.78%, and 99.87%−105.40%, respectively. In the fed trial, the corresponding 90% CIs were 82.07%−101.66%, 93.00%−102.02%, and 99.38%−104.51%, respectively. Seventeen adverse events (AEs) were recorded in 10 subjects (41.7%) in the fasting trial and 17 AEs in 12 subjects (40.0%) in the fed trial. All AEs were grade 1 (mild). These results demonstrate that the test and reference diclofenac sodium sustained-release tablets are bioequivalent and well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects, supporting their clinical interchangeability.
{"title":"Pharmacokinetics, Bioequivalence, and Safety of Diclofenac Sodium Sustained-Release Tablets in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions","authors":"Biao Sun, Li Zhao, Fangliang Gan, Qiong Zhan","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70019","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70019","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence, and safety of domestic diclofenac sodium sustained-release tablets (0.1 g) and a reference formulation in healthy Chinese subjects. Two independent trials (fasting and fed conditions) were conducted with a single-center, randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-sequence, four-period, fully replicated design. Plasma diclofenac concentrations were determined by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated via a noncompartmental model using Phoenix WinNonlin software (version 7.0). Multivariate analysis of variance was performed on the natural logarithm-transformed pharmacokinetic parameters (C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0–t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0–∞</sub>) of the test and reference formulations using a mixed linear model. Average bioequivalence (ABE) was used for assessment if the within-subject variability (S<sub>WR</sub>) of the reference formulation was < 0.294; otherwise, reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) was applied. In the fasting trial, the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric least-squares mean ratios of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0–t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0–∞</sub> (test/reference) were 82.35%−106.55%, 99.77%−105.78%, and 99.87%−105.40%, respectively. In the fed trial, the corresponding 90% CIs were 82.07%−101.66%, 93.00%−102.02%, and 99.38%−104.51%, respectively. Seventeen adverse events (AEs) were recorded in 10 subjects (41.7%) in the fasting trial and 17 AEs in 12 subjects (40.0%) in the fed trial. All AEs were grade 1 (mild). These results demonstrate that the test and reference diclofenac sodium sustained-release tablets are bioequivalent and well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects, supporting their clinical interchangeability.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This first-in-human phase I trial evaluated RL001, a self-emulsifying soft-capsule abiraterone developed to overcome the low bioavailability and food sensitivity associated with the 1000-mg Zytiga tablet that is used with prednisone according to NCCN guidelines. Plasma concentrations were quantified by LC-MS/MS and modeled in Phoenix WinNonlin 8.1 and SAS; GeoMean confidence intervals compared pharmacokinetics. Against 1000-mg abiraterone acetate tablet, the 200 mg RL001 achieved abiraterone Cmax GMR >125% and AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ 80–125%, indicating higher bioavailability and enabling a lower therapeutic dose. The GMR of prednisone and its metabolite remained within 80%–125%, confirming no interaction. Fed/fasted exposure ratios stayed around 80% for AUC and <80% for Cmax, eliminating food spikes. Hyperbilirubinemia and hypertriglyceridemia were significantly less frequent. The abiraterone self-emulsifying soft capsule represents a safer and more convenient therapeutic option in the management of prostate cancer.
{"title":"Evaluation of a New Formulation That Improves the Bioavailability and Food Effect of Abiraterone: An Open-Label, Crossover, Randomized, Controlled, Phase I Clinical Trial","authors":"Mulin Yi, Shiqi Tu, Zeneng Cheng, Kun Xia","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70011","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70011","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This first-in-human phase I trial evaluated RL001, a self-emulsifying soft-capsule abiraterone developed to overcome the low bioavailability and food sensitivity associated with the 1000-mg Zytiga tablet that is used with prednisone according to NCCN guidelines. Plasma concentrations were quantified by LC-MS/MS and modeled in Phoenix WinNonlin 8.1 and SAS; GeoMean confidence intervals compared pharmacokinetics. Against 1000-mg abiraterone acetate tablet, the 200 mg RL001 achieved abiraterone C<sub>max</sub> GMR >125% and AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> 80–125%, indicating higher bioavailability and enabling a lower therapeutic dose. The GMR of prednisone and its metabolite remained within 80%–125%, confirming no interaction. Fed/fasted exposure ratios stayed around 80% for AUC and <80% for C<sub>max</sub>, eliminating food spikes. Hyperbilirubinemia and hypertriglyceridemia were significantly less frequent. The abiraterone self-emulsifying soft capsule represents a safer and more convenient therapeutic option in the management of prostate cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997384","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of LP-001 injection in healthy Chinese subjects. This was a single-center, double-blind, randomized, dose-escalation study. Fifty-six healthy adults were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive LP-001 or matched placebo. A total of 156.0 drug related adverse events occurred during treatment in 38 subjects who received LP-001 injection. The main events were grade 1 serum iron reduction and elevated triglycerides, which were considered related to the drug's erythropoietic effect and reversible. Pharmacokinetic exposure increased with dose (0.5–50 mcg·kg−1), but the increase in maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) was greater than the dose ratio (non-linear). Pharmacodynamics showed dose-dependent increases in hemoglobin (Hb), red blood cell count (RBC), hematocrit (HCT), and reticulocyte count (Rtc). The pharmacodynamic indicators in the 15 and 30 mcg·kg−1 multiple-dose groups were significantly higher than those in the placebo group, and the increase in RBC count was more pronounced in the 30 mcg·kg−1 group. LP001, a long-acting rhEPO, was safe and well-tolerated at all doses in this Phase I study. These findings support its continued development as a treatment for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).
{"title":"LP-001, a Novel Long-Acting EPO-Fc Fusion Protein: A Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability in Healthy Chinese Subjects","authors":"Jie Yang, Jiaxiang Ding, Yuanyuan Xu, Ying Wang, Cuicui Han, Heng Liu, Huan Zhou","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70020","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70020","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of LP-001 injection in healthy Chinese subjects. This was a single-center, double-blind, randomized, dose-escalation study. Fifty-six healthy adults were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive LP-001 or matched placebo. A total of 156.0 drug related adverse events occurred during treatment in 38 subjects who received LP-001 injection. The main events were grade 1 serum iron reduction and elevated triglycerides, which were considered related to the drug's erythropoietic effect and reversible. Pharmacokinetic exposure increased with dose (0.5–50 mcg·kg<sup>−1</sup>), but the increase in maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) was greater than the dose ratio (non-linear). Pharmacodynamics showed dose-dependent increases in hemoglobin (Hb), red blood cell count (RBC), hematocrit (HCT), and reticulocyte count (Rtc). The pharmacodynamic indicators in the 15 and 30 mcg·kg<sup>−1</sup> multiple-dose groups were significantly higher than those in the placebo group, and the increase in RBC count was more pronounced in the 30 mcg·kg<sup>−1</sup> group. LP001, a long-acting rhEPO, was safe and well-tolerated at all doses in this Phase I study. These findings support its continued development as a treatment for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Peter Zannikos, JongHanne Park, Anna Dari, Samiha Takhtoukh, Paul Levesque, Alexei N. Plotnikov, Amitava Mitra, Antoinette Ajavon-Hartmann, Samira Merali, Juan Jose Perez Ruixo, Navin Goyal
Milvexian is an oral factor XIa inhibitor in development for prevention of major thromboembolic conditions. This randomized, double-blind, placebo- and positive-controlled, multiple-dose, four-period crossover study assessed the cardic safety of milvexian (including effects on the QT interval of the electrocardiogram), with a supporting in vitro component. Sixty-six participants were enrolled. In each treatment period, participants received milvexian (100 or 200 mg) or placebo every 12 h for 4 days. A single-dose moxifloxacin (400 mg) served as a positive control. Electrocardiographs and time-matched pharmacokinetic samples were collected during each period. In mixed-effects models, the upper limit of the two-sided 90% confidence interval for the least squares means for change from baseline QTc (Fridericia [QTcF], as the primary correction method) for milvexian versus placebo (ΔΔQTc) was ˂10 ms at all time points after each milvexian regimen. In addition, there was no apparent relationship between ΔΔQTcF and plasma milvexian concentrations. Moxifloxacin response confirmed assay sensitivity. Milvexian inhibited human ether-a-go-go-related gene potassium, sodium, and L-type calcium ion channel currents with weak-to-moderate potency at concentrations exceeding the highest mean unbound maximum plasma concentrations of TQT study participants. Milvexian regimens were safe and well tolerated. These data indicate that milvexian does not prolong the QTc interval at clinically relevant concentrations.
{"title":"A Thorough QT Study to Assess the Effects of Milvexian on Cardiac Repolarization in Healthy Participants","authors":"Peter Zannikos, JongHanne Park, Anna Dari, Samiha Takhtoukh, Paul Levesque, Alexei N. Plotnikov, Amitava Mitra, Antoinette Ajavon-Hartmann, Samira Merali, Juan Jose Perez Ruixo, Navin Goyal","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70015","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70015","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Milvexian is an oral factor XIa inhibitor in development for prevention of major thromboembolic conditions. This randomized, double-blind, placebo- and positive-controlled, multiple-dose, four-period crossover study assessed the cardic safety of milvexian (including effects on the QT interval of the electrocardiogram), with a supporting in vitro component. Sixty-six participants were enrolled. In each treatment period, participants received milvexian (100 or 200 mg) or placebo every 12 h for 4 days. A single-dose moxifloxacin (400 mg) served as a positive control. Electrocardiographs and time-matched pharmacokinetic samples were collected during each period. In mixed-effects models, the upper limit of the two-sided 90% confidence interval for the least squares means for change from baseline QTc (Fridericia [QTcF], as the primary correction method) for milvexian versus placebo (ΔΔQTc) was ˂10 ms at all time points after each milvexian regimen. In addition, there was no apparent relationship between ΔΔQTcF and plasma milvexian concentrations. Moxifloxacin response confirmed assay sensitivity. Milvexian inhibited human ether-a-go-go-related gene potassium, sodium, and L-type calcium ion channel currents with weak-to-moderate potency at concentrations exceeding the highest mean unbound maximum plasma concentrations of TQT study participants. Milvexian regimens were safe and well tolerated. These data indicate that milvexian does not prolong the QTc interval at clinically relevant concentrations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.70015","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Vipul K. Gupta, Brian Yoo, Daniel Weiss, Frank G. Basile, Edgar Schuck, Christopher M. Rubino, Sen Zhang, Stephen E. Maxwell, Wenxin Zheng, Joanne B. L. Tan, David Stenehjem, Paul B. Watkins, Margaret Dugan, Wu Yin, D. Hamish Wright, Karen Akinsanya, Jason Lickliter
SGR-1505 is a novel small-molecule inhibitor of MALT1, a key mediator of NF-κB signaling implicated in the pathogenesis of B-cell malignancies. This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of SGR-1505 in healthy volunteers. In this four-part, open-label study, 73 participants received single or multiple oral doses of SGR-1505 (25–225 mg). A food effect study assessed SGR-1505 exposure with and without a high-calorie, high-fat meal. The CYP3A4 drug–drug interaction potential of SGR-1505 was evaluated by co-administration with posaconazole, a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. SGR-1505 was rapidly absorbed (median Tmax 2–4 h) with a dose-proportional increase in exposure up to 100 mg. Twice daily dosing at 100 mg over 10 days resulted in a 1.6-fold increase in both Cmax and AUC and a 2.5-fold increase in Ctrough compared to once daily dosing at 150 mg. A high-fat, high-calorie meal increased SGR-1505 Cmax 1.6-fold and AUC 1.3-fold compared to the fasted state. Co-administration with posaconazole increased SGR-1505 exposure 3-fold. SGR-1505 inhibited ex vivo stimulated T-cell derived IL-2 production in a concentration-dependent manner. Most adverse events were mild. Asymptomatic, reversible indirect hyperbilirubinemia occurred, consistent with inhibition of UGT1A1. SGR-1505 was well-tolerated and exhibited favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, supporting further clinical development.
{"title":"A Phase 1 Dose-Escalation, Food Effect, and Drug–Drug Interaction Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of the MALT1 Inhibitor, SGR-1505, in Healthy Volunteers","authors":"Vipul K. Gupta, Brian Yoo, Daniel Weiss, Frank G. Basile, Edgar Schuck, Christopher M. Rubino, Sen Zhang, Stephen E. Maxwell, Wenxin Zheng, Joanne B. L. Tan, David Stenehjem, Paul B. Watkins, Margaret Dugan, Wu Yin, D. Hamish Wright, Karen Akinsanya, Jason Lickliter","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70008","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70008","url":null,"abstract":"<p>SGR-1505 is a novel small-molecule inhibitor of MALT1, a key mediator of NF-κB signaling implicated in the pathogenesis of B-cell malignancies. This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of SGR-1505 in healthy volunteers. In this four-part, open-label study, 73 participants received single or multiple oral doses of SGR-1505 (25–225 mg). A food effect study assessed SGR-1505 exposure with and without a high-calorie, high-fat meal. The CYP3A4 drug–drug interaction potential of SGR-1505 was evaluated by co-administration with posaconazole, a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. SGR-1505 was rapidly absorbed (median T<sub>max</sub> 2–4 h) with a dose-proportional increase in exposure up to 100 mg. Twice daily dosing at 100 mg over 10 days resulted in a 1.6-fold increase in both C<sub>max</sub> and AUC and a 2.5-fold increase in C<sub>trough</sub> compared to once daily dosing at 150 mg. A high-fat, high-calorie meal increased SGR-1505 C<sub>max</sub> 1.6-fold and AUC 1.3-fold compared to the fasted state. Co-administration with posaconazole increased SGR-1505 exposure 3-fold. SGR-1505 inhibited ex vivo stimulated T-cell derived IL-2 production in a concentration-dependent manner. Most adverse events were mild. Asymptomatic, reversible indirect hyperbilirubinemia occurred, consistent with inhibition of UGT1A1. SGR-1505 was well-tolerated and exhibited favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, supporting further clinical development.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.70008","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}