Dietmar Schwab, Carsten Hofmann, Nicole Justies, Daniel S Dickerson, Ali Keshavarz, Thijs van Iersel, Kimberly Martens, Beate Bittner
Gantenerumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting amyloid beta plaques in the brain, reduces plaque accumulation and was developed to slow Alzheimer's disease progression. Results from the pivotal GRADUATE I and II studies evaluating gantenerumab in people with early Alzheimer's disease were announced in 2022. The studies did not meet their primary endpoint of slowing clinical decline. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and safety of a high concentration liquid formulation of gantenerumab administered subcutaneously as a single dose using an autoinjector (AI) or a disposable syringe (DS). The DS was employed in pivotal clinical trials, while the AI was developed in parallel to ease SC administration. The study aimed to demonstrate bioequivalence (BE) between AI and DS administration in healthy participants, defined by 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for geometric least square (LS) mean ratios being within the 0.80-1.25 range for maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). Among the 266 healthy participants, 135 received 255 mg gantenerumab via AI and 131 received 255 mg via DS in a parallel group design. BE between AI and DS SC administration was demonstrated with geometric LS mean ratios (90% CIs) for Cmax, AUC0-inf, and AUC0-last of 1.078 (1.006, 1.155), 1.053 (0.986, 1.124), and 1.054 (0.992, 1.121), respectively, all within the 0.80-1.25 BE range. Safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of gantenerumab.
{"title":"Bioequivalence Between a Gantenerumab Disposable Syringe and an Autoinjector: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Healthy Volunteers.","authors":"Dietmar Schwab, Carsten Hofmann, Nicole Justies, Daniel S Dickerson, Ali Keshavarz, Thijs van Iersel, Kimberly Martens, Beate Bittner","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.70038","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gantenerumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting amyloid beta plaques in the brain, reduces plaque accumulation and was developed to slow Alzheimer's disease progression. Results from the pivotal GRADUATE I and II studies evaluating gantenerumab in people with early Alzheimer's disease were announced in 2022. The studies did not meet their primary endpoint of slowing clinical decline. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and safety of a high concentration liquid formulation of gantenerumab administered subcutaneously as a single dose using an autoinjector (AI) or a disposable syringe (DS). The DS was employed in pivotal clinical trials, while the AI was developed in parallel to ease SC administration. The study aimed to demonstrate bioequivalence (BE) between AI and DS administration in healthy participants, defined by 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for geometric least square (LS) mean ratios being within the 0.80-1.25 range for maximum observed plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). Among the 266 healthy participants, 135 received 255 mg gantenerumab via AI and 131 received 255 mg via DS in a parallel group design. BE between AI and DS SC administration was demonstrated with geometric LS mean ratios (90% CIs) for C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-inf</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-last</sub> of 1.078 (1.006, 1.155), 1.053 (0.986, 1.124), and 1.054 (0.992, 1.121), respectively, all within the 0.80-1.25 BE range. Safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of gantenerumab.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 2","pages":"e70038"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146218732","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study evaluated the bioequivalence and safety of two fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet formulations of metformin/empagliflozin (1000 mg/5 mg) in healthy Chinese subjects. A single-center, open-label, randomized, two-period, two-treatment, and two-sequence crossover study was conducted, enrolling 56 subjects who were assigned to either fasting or fed conditions in a 1:1 ratio. Each subject received both the test and reference formulations, with a 7-day washout period between administrations. Blood samples were collected up to 48 h post-dose, and plasma concentrations of metformin and empagliflozin were determined using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Bioequivalence was assessed based on key pharmacokinetic parameters—Cmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0–∞—with the geometric least-squares mean ratios of the test to reference formulation falling within the accepted bioequivalence range of 80.00% to 125.00% for all 90% confidence intervals under both fasting and fed states. High-fat meals significantly reduced the Cmax of metformin and empagliflozin by approximately 47% and 28%, respectively, and their overall exposure (AUC0−∞) by approximately 29% and 15%, respectively. No serious adverse events were reported. In conclusion, the test and reference formulations of metformin/empagliflozin FDC tablets were bioequivalent and well-tolerated under both fasting and fed conditions.
{"title":"Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Metformin/Empagliflozin Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasting and Fed Conditions: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Study","authors":"Yuyan Lei, Qin Yi, Shan Ji, Juli Lu, Zhenya Yang","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70029","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70029","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study evaluated the bioequivalence and safety of two fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet formulations of metformin/empagliflozin (1000 mg/5 mg) in healthy Chinese subjects. A single-center, open-label, randomized, two-period, two-treatment, and two-sequence crossover study was conducted, enrolling 56 subjects who were assigned to either fasting or fed conditions in a 1:1 ratio. Each subject received both the test and reference formulations, with a 7-day washout period between administrations. Blood samples were collected up to 48 h post-dose, and plasma concentrations of metformin and empagliflozin were determined using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Bioequivalence was assessed based on key pharmacokinetic parameters—C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0–t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0–∞</sub>—with the geometric least-squares mean ratios of the test to reference formulation falling within the accepted bioequivalence range of 80.00% to 125.00% for all 90% confidence intervals under both fasting and fed states. High-fat meals significantly reduced the C<sub>max</sub> of metformin and empagliflozin by approximately 47% and 28%, respectively, and their overall exposure (AUC<sub>0−∞</sub>) by approximately 29% and 15%, respectively. No serious adverse events were reported. In conclusion, the test and reference formulations of metformin/empagliflozin FDC tablets were bioequivalent and well-tolerated under both fasting and fed conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146040657","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Ramesh R. Boinpally, Joshua Rowe, Pushpa Chandrasekar, Rebecca B. White, Eugene E. Marcantonio, Nicole Trainor, Yuexia Liang, Cheri Maciolek, James H. Small, Robert Houle, Michael J. Hafey, Huizhi Xie, Jocelyn Yabut, Christine Fandozzi
Ubrogepant is a calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonist approved for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in adults. The mass balance and metabolism of ubrogepant was evaluated in six healthy male adults administered a single oral dose of [14C]-ubrogepant 50 mg (∼200 µCi). Overall, the mean total radioactivity recovery was 92.4% (95% CI: 77.8%-107%) of the administered dose, with 82.9% in feces (95% CI: 66.7%-99.1%) and 9.52% in urine (95% CI: 7.78%-11.3%). Ubrogepant was eliminated mainly via metabolism, primarily via biliary/fecal excretion. Approximately 42% and 6% of the dose was excreted as unchanged parent drug in feces and urine, respectively. The major circulating components of drug-related material (DRM) in pooled plasma samples were ubrogepant (55%), M15 (13%), and M20 (3.5%). M15 (glucuronide of methylated catechol) and M20 (glucuronide of mono-oxygenated ubrogepant [M8]) also were the main metabolites in urine, together representing about 2% of DRM. In feces, the main metabolites were the oxidative metabolites M6 (di-oxygenated ubrogepant) and M8, together representing about 29% of DRM. In vitro assays showed that ubrogepant metabolism occurs predominantly via CYP3A4.
{"title":"A Human Mass Balance and Metabolism Study of [14C]-Ubrogepant in Healthy Male Adults","authors":"Ramesh R. Boinpally, Joshua Rowe, Pushpa Chandrasekar, Rebecca B. White, Eugene E. Marcantonio, Nicole Trainor, Yuexia Liang, Cheri Maciolek, James H. Small, Robert Houle, Michael J. Hafey, Huizhi Xie, Jocelyn Yabut, Christine Fandozzi","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70010","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70010","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ubrogepant is a calcitonin gene–related peptide receptor antagonist approved for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in adults. The mass balance and metabolism of ubrogepant was evaluated in six healthy male adults administered a single oral dose of [<sup>14</sup>C]-ubrogepant 50 mg (∼200 µCi). Overall, the mean total radioactivity recovery was 92.4% (95% CI: 77.8%-107%) of the administered dose, with 82.9% in feces (95% CI: 66.7%-99.1%) and 9.52% in urine (95% CI: 7.78%-11.3%). Ubrogepant was eliminated mainly via metabolism, primarily via biliary/fecal excretion. Approximately 42% and 6% of the dose was excreted as unchanged parent drug in feces and urine, respectively. The major circulating components of drug-related material (DRM) in pooled plasma samples were ubrogepant (55%), M15 (13%), and M20 (3.5%). M15 (glucuronide of methylated catechol) and M20 (glucuronide of mono-oxygenated ubrogepant [M8]) also were the main metabolites in urine, together representing about 2% of DRM. In feces, the main metabolites were the oxidative metabolites M6 (di-oxygenated ubrogepant) and M8, together representing about 29% of DRM. In vitro assays showed that ubrogepant metabolism occurs predominantly via CYP3A4.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12821552/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146009286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva is a rare, progressive autosomal dominant genetic disease caused by an activin receptor-like kinase 2 (ALK2) mutation with a need for effective prophylactic therapies. This single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of DS-6016a, a novel humanized monoclonal anti-ALK2 antibody, in healthy Japanese adults. In each of the 5–1000 mg DS-6016a or placebo single subcutaneous dose cohorts, eight male participants were randomly assigned at a 3:1 ratio. DS-6016a had median times to maximum plasma concentration of 144–240 h and elimination half-lives of 391–844 h. The increase in DS-6016a exposure was greater than dose-proportional across the dose range of 5–1000 mg. The incidence of study drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 17% in the placebo group and 11% across all DS-6016a groups; all were mild and resolved without treatment. No deaths, serious or severe TEAEs, or TEAEs leading to study discontinuation were reported. Ferritin showed a statistically significant dose-dependent decrease from baseline, while serum iron showed no clear dose-dependency. No relationship was observed between DS-6016a dose and the development of anti-drug antibodies. DS-6016a had an acceptable safety profile at single subcutaneous doses of 5–1000 mg.
{"title":"First-In-Human Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of DS-6016a After Single Subcutaneous Injection in Healthy Japanese Adults","authors":"Kei Okita, Hidetoshi Furuie, Akifumi Kurata, Yasuko Owada, Satoshi Yoshiba, Kei Furihata, Takaaki Oka, Yushi Kashihara, Hitoshi Ishizuka, Kazutaka Yoshihara","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70023","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70023","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva is a rare, progressive autosomal dominant genetic disease caused by an activin receptor-like kinase 2 (ALK2) mutation with a need for effective prophylactic therapies. This single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of DS-6016a, a novel humanized monoclonal anti-ALK2 antibody, in healthy Japanese adults. In each of the 5–1000 mg DS-6016a or placebo single subcutaneous dose cohorts, eight male participants were randomly assigned at a 3:1 ratio. DS-6016a had median times to maximum plasma concentration of 144–240 h and elimination half-lives of 391–844 h. The increase in DS-6016a exposure was greater than dose-proportional across the dose range of 5–1000 mg. The incidence of study drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 17% in the placebo group and 11% across all DS-6016a groups; all were mild and resolved without treatment. No deaths, serious or severe TEAEs, or TEAEs leading to study discontinuation were reported. Ferritin showed a statistically significant dose-dependent decrease from baseline, while serum iron showed no clear dose-dependency. No relationship was observed between DS-6016a dose and the development of anti-drug antibodies. DS-6016a had an acceptable safety profile at single subcutaneous doses of 5–1000 mg.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12821564/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146009305","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Seol Ju Moon, Sung Hee Hong, Yirang Lim, Jae-Yong Chung
Antihypertensive drugs are more potent when administered in combinations of two or three different classes of drugs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction among amlodipine, losartan, and chlorthalidone. A randomized, open-label, four-sequence, four-period, four-treatment, single-dose study was conducted in healthy Korean male subjects, with oral administrations of two tablets of amlodipine 5 mg, one tablet of losartan 100 mg, one tablet of chlorthalidone 25 mg, or co-administration of all three investigational products. Plasma drug concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Twenty-six subjects completed the study. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of Cmax and AUClast, respectively, were 1.0928 (1.0412-1.1469) and 1.0360 (0.9958-1.0778) for amlodipine; 1.1016 (0.9136-1.3284) and 1.1606 (1.0885-1.2375) for losartan; 1.0720 (1.0119-1.1356) and 1.0902 (1.0350-1.1148) for EXP3174 (active metabolite of losartan); and 0.9462 (0.8626-1.0379) and 1.0266 (0.9752-1.0807) for chlorthalidone. All the treatments were well tolerated overall. Besides the slight increase in losartan Cmax, the combination therapy did not show clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions in terms of systemic drug exposure.
{"title":"Pharmacokinetic Interaction Among Amlodipine, Losartan, and Chlorthalidone after a Single Oral Administration in Healthy Male Subjects","authors":"Seol Ju Moon, Sung Hee Hong, Yirang Lim, Jae-Yong Chung","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70024","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70024","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Antihypertensive drugs are more potent when administered in combinations of two or three different classes of drugs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction among amlodipine, losartan, and chlorthalidone. A randomized, open-label, four-sequence, four-period, four-treatment, single-dose study was conducted in healthy Korean male subjects, with oral administrations of two tablets of amlodipine 5 mg, one tablet of losartan 100 mg, one tablet of chlorthalidone 25 mg, or co-administration of all three investigational products. Plasma drug concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Twenty-six subjects completed the study. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>last,</sub> respectively, were 1.0928 (1.0412-1.1469) and 1.0360 (0.9958-1.0778) for amlodipine; 1.1016 (0.9136-1.3284) and 1.1606 (1.0885-1.2375) for losartan; 1.0720 (1.0119-1.1356) and 1.0902 (1.0350-1.1148) for EXP3174 (active metabolite of losartan); and 0.9462 (0.8626-1.0379) and 1.0266 (0.9752-1.0807) for chlorthalidone. All the treatments were well tolerated overall. Besides the slight increase in losartan C<sub>max</sub>, the combination therapy did not show clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions in terms of systemic drug exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Jia-ying Wang, Wen-jun Chen, Zou-rong Ruan, Xue-hua Zhang, Jia-qiu Du, Xiao-feng Cui, Rong Shao, Dan-dan Yang, Hong-gang Lou, Bo Jiang
Stains and cholesterol absorption inhibitors are frequently co-administered in the management of dyslipidemia. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between atorvastatin and hybutimibe in healthy Chinese subjects. A randomized, open-label, three-treatment, six-period crossover study was conducted involving 24 participants. Subjects received once-daily treatments for 14 days per period (14-day washout): atorvastatin 20 mg, hybutimibe 10 mg, or their combination. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and their 90% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) of atorvastatin, hybutimibe, and their metabolites, comparing combination therapy with monotherapy. At steady state, the GMRs (90% CI) for atorvastatin were 89.9 (74.6, 108.2) for Cmax and 103.7 (96.0, 112.0) for AUC0-∞ when administered with or without hybutimibe. For total hybutimibe, the corresponding values were 120.6 (102.4, 142.0) and 105.7 (97.1, 115.2), respectively. Considering the limited PK changes and good safety profiles of both drugs, the interaction between atorvastatin and hybutimibe will likely have no significant clinical impact.
{"title":"Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Atorvastatin and Hybutimibe in Healthy Chinese Volunteers","authors":"Jia-ying Wang, Wen-jun Chen, Zou-rong Ruan, Xue-hua Zhang, Jia-qiu Du, Xiao-feng Cui, Rong Shao, Dan-dan Yang, Hong-gang Lou, Bo Jiang","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70017","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70017","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Stains and cholesterol absorption inhibitors are frequently co-administered in the management of dyslipidemia. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between atorvastatin and hybutimibe in healthy Chinese subjects. A randomized, open-label, three-treatment, six-period crossover study was conducted involving 24 participants. Subjects received once-daily treatments for 14 days per period (14-day washout): atorvastatin 20 mg, hybutimibe 10 mg, or their combination. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and their 90% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) and the area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) of atorvastatin, hybutimibe, and their metabolites, comparing combination therapy with monotherapy. At steady state, the GMRs (90% CI) for atorvastatin were 89.9 (74.6, 108.2) for C<sub>max</sub> and 103.7 (96.0, 112.0) for AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> when administered with or without hybutimibe. For total hybutimibe, the corresponding values were 120.6 (102.4, 142.0) and 105.7 (97.1, 115.2), respectively. Considering the limited PK changes and good safety profiles of both drugs, the interaction between atorvastatin and hybutimibe will likely have no significant clinical impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Andrew C. Vendel, Olivier Benichou, Ching-Yun Chang, Gourab Datta, Andrea Ferrante, Indrajit Ghosh, Brian A. Moser, Susan E. Sweeney, Jennifer Witcher, Matthew D. Linnik
Venanprubart (LY3361237), an agonist antibody to B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA), was developed as a potential treatment for autoimmune disorders, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and psoriasis. We tested venanprubart in three human Phase 1 safety studies: a single ascending dose (SAD) study in healthy participants (1/2/5/15/50/150 mg subcutaneously, or 150/400 mg intravenously; n = 64), a multiple ascending dose study in patients with SLE (six doses every 2 weeks at 50/150/450 mg subcutaneously; n = 28), and a randomized controlled study in patients with psoriasis (six doses every 2 weeks at 450 mg subcutaneously; n = 24). Key endpoints across studies included safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, receptor occupancy of BTLA on B cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and immunogenicity as measured by treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies (TE ADA). Venanprubart was well tolerated in healthy participants and in patients with SLE and psoriasis. No participants discontinued treatment due to adverse events, and nearly all treatment-emergent events were mild or moderate. The pharmacokinetic profile of venanprubart was nonlinear. Serum concentrations of venanprubart increased greater than dose proportionally at lower doses, but exposure became more linear after target binding was nearly saturated. Higher doses led to high levels of receptor occupancy on B cells, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells, indicating a high level of target engagement. Irrespective of titer, TE ADA incidence was 79%, 71%, and 71% for healthy participants, patients with SLE, and patients with psoriasis, respectively. ADA titers were lower in the repeat-dose studies compared to the SAD study, especially at higher doses.
{"title":"Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity of a BTLA Agonist Antibody (Venanprubart) in Healthy Participants, Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, and Patients with Psoriasis: Results From Three Phase 1 Studies","authors":"Andrew C. Vendel, Olivier Benichou, Ching-Yun Chang, Gourab Datta, Andrea Ferrante, Indrajit Ghosh, Brian A. Moser, Susan E. Sweeney, Jennifer Witcher, Matthew D. Linnik","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70014","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70014","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Venanprubart (LY3361237), an agonist antibody to B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA), was developed as a potential treatment for autoimmune disorders, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and psoriasis. We tested venanprubart in three human Phase 1 safety studies: a single ascending dose (SAD) study in healthy participants (1/2/5/15/50/150 mg subcutaneously, or 150/400 mg intravenously; n = 64), a multiple ascending dose study in patients with SLE (six doses every 2 weeks at 50/150/450 mg subcutaneously; n = 28), and a randomized controlled study in patients with psoriasis (six doses every 2 weeks at 450 mg subcutaneously; n = 24). Key endpoints across studies included safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, receptor occupancy of BTLA on B cells, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and immunogenicity as measured by treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies (TE ADA). Venanprubart was well tolerated in healthy participants and in patients with SLE and psoriasis. No participants discontinued treatment due to adverse events, and nearly all treatment-emergent events were mild or moderate. The pharmacokinetic profile of venanprubart was nonlinear. Serum concentrations of venanprubart increased greater than dose proportionally at lower doses, but exposure became more linear after target binding was nearly saturated. Higher doses led to high levels of receptor occupancy on B cells, CD4+, and CD8+ T cells, indicating a high level of target engagement. Irrespective of titer, TE ADA incidence was 79%, 71%, and 71% for healthy participants, patients with SLE, and patients with psoriasis, respectively. ADA titers were lower in the repeat-dose studies compared to the SAD study, especially at higher doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.70014","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study assessed the effect of high-fat food on pharmacokinetics and safety of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat in healthy Chinese participants under fasting and fed conditions from a bioequivalence trial. This trial enrolled a total of 92 healthy participants, and there was a significant difference in age between fasting and fed trials (P = .006). These participants received an amlodipine/benazepril capsule containing 5 mg amlodipine and 10 mg benazepril each period with a 21-day washout under fasting or fed conditions. Twenty-four blood samples were obtained from baseline to 168 h after drug administration for pharmacokinetic analyses. The plasma concentrations of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat were determined by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. After controlling for age, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) or Quade’s ANCOVA of pharmacokinetic results indicated that a high-fat meal did not significantly influence the primary pharmacokinetic parameters of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat, except for the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and time to reach maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) for benazepril and benazeprilat. The high-fat food decreased Cmax of benazepril by 64.1% and Cmax of benazeprilat by 30.8%, and increased Tmax of benazepril by 408.2% and Tmax of benazeprilat by 167.8% The incidence of most frequently observed AE of hypotension was significantly different (P = .014, risk ratio = 2.286, and 95% confidence intervals 1.103 to 4.737) under fasting and fed conditions. It suggested that high-fat food containing 800 to 1000 kcal might be the risk factor for healthy Chinese participants taking amlodipine/benazepril capsules.
{"title":"Effect of High-Fat Food on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Amlodipine/Benazepril in Healthy Chinese Participants","authors":"Congyang Ding, Haojing Song, Bo Qiu, Xue Sun, Caihui Guo, Wanjun Bai, Huizhen Wu, Zhanjun Dong","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70022","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70022","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study assessed the effect of high-fat food on pharmacokinetics and safety of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat in healthy Chinese participants under fasting and fed conditions from a bioequivalence trial. This trial enrolled a total of 92 healthy participants, and there was a significant difference in age between fasting and fed trials (<i>P</i> = .006). These participants received an amlodipine/benazepril capsule containing 5 mg amlodipine and 10 mg benazepril each period with a 21-day washout under fasting or fed conditions. Twenty-four blood samples were obtained from baseline to 168 h after drug administration for pharmacokinetic analyses. The plasma concentrations of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat were determined by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. After controlling for age, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) or <i>Quade</i>’s ANCOVA of pharmacokinetic results indicated that a high-fat meal did not significantly influence the primary pharmacokinetic parameters of amlodipine, benazepril, and benazeprilat, except for the maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) and time to reach maximum plasma concentration (T<sub>max</sub>) for benazepril and benazeprilat. The high-fat food decreased C<sub>max</sub> of benazepril by 64.1% and C<sub>max</sub> of benazeprilat by 30.8%, and increased T<sub>max</sub> of benazepril by 408.2% and T<sub>max</sub> of benazeprilat by 167.8% The incidence of most frequently observed AE of hypotension was significantly different (<i>P</i> = .014, risk ratio = 2.286, and 95% confidence intervals 1.103 to 4.737) under fasting and fed conditions. It suggested that high-fat food containing 800 to 1000 kcal might be the risk factor for healthy Chinese participants taking amlodipine/benazepril capsules.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997433","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Adekunle Alabi, Janice S. Kerr, Mita Shah, Adnan Khan, Joseph D. Ma, Raymond T. Suhandynata, Jeremiah D. Momper, Shirley M. Tsunoda
Grapefruit juice (GFJ) is a known inhibitor of intestinal cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) metabolism leading to increased exposure to CYP3A substrates such as tacrolimus. The extended-release tacrolimus formulation Envarsus (LCPT) exhibits prolonged absorption throughout the entire GI tract. Although a clinically significant drug–drug interaction occurs with immediate-release tacrolimus formulations, this has not been evaluated with extended-release formulations. This study assessed the impact of GFJ on LCPT in adult kidney transplant patients. Eleven adult kidney transplant recipients on a stable dose of LCPT were enrolled in a randomized crossover study. Participants were administered either GFJ or water during each pharmacokinetic visit, with midazolam used as a positive control. A washout period of 2–4 weeks was included between visits. Tacrolimus concentrations were determined using validated LC-MS/MS methods. Tacrolimus AUC0–24 was 28% higher with GFJ (GMR = 1.28, 90% CI 1.12–1.44) and Cmax was 73% higher (GMR = 1.73, 90% CI 1.46–2.00) compared to control. GFJ exhibited a clinically meaningful interaction with LCPT. However, the magnitude appears less than those reported with immediate-release formulations, suggesting the extended absorption profile of LCPT may affect susceptibility to drug interactions in the intestine.
葡萄柚汁(GFJ)是一种已知的肠道细胞色素P450 3A (CYP3A)代谢抑制剂,导致CYP3A底物(如他克莫司)暴露增加。缓释他克莫司制剂Envarsus (LCPT)在整个胃肠道中表现出延长的吸收。尽管临床显著的药物-药物相互作用发生在速释他克莫司制剂中,但尚未对缓释制剂进行评估。本研究评估了GFJ对成人肾移植患者LCPT的影响。11名接受稳定剂量LCPT的成人肾移植受者被纳入一项随机交叉研究。在每次药代动力学访问期间,参与者被给予GFJ或水,咪达唑仑作为阳性对照。两次访问之间有2-4周的洗脱期。采用经验证的LC-MS/MS方法测定他克莫司浓度。他克莫司AUC0-24与对照组相比,GFJ升高28% (GMR = 1.28, 90% CI 1.12-1.44), Cmax升高73% (GMR = 1.73, 90% CI 1.46-2.00)。GFJ与LCPT表现出有临床意义的相互作用。然而,其强度似乎小于速释制剂,这表明LCPT的延长吸收可能会影响肠内药物相互作用的敏感性。
{"title":"Assessment of the Intestinal CYP3A Contribution to Drug Interactions with Extended-Release Tacrolimus (LCPT) Using Grapefruit Juice","authors":"Adekunle Alabi, Janice S. Kerr, Mita Shah, Adnan Khan, Joseph D. Ma, Raymond T. Suhandynata, Jeremiah D. Momper, Shirley M. Tsunoda","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70016","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70016","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Grapefruit juice (GFJ) is a known inhibitor of intestinal cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) metabolism leading to increased exposure to CYP3A substrates such as tacrolimus. The extended-release tacrolimus formulation Envarsus (LCPT) exhibits prolonged absorption throughout the entire GI tract. Although a clinically significant drug–drug interaction occurs with immediate-release tacrolimus formulations, this has not been evaluated with extended-release formulations. This study assessed the impact of GFJ on LCPT in adult kidney transplant patients. Eleven adult kidney transplant recipients on a stable dose of LCPT were enrolled in a randomized crossover study. Participants were administered either GFJ or water during each pharmacokinetic visit, with midazolam used as a positive control. A washout period of 2–4 weeks was included between visits. Tacrolimus concentrations were determined using validated LC-MS/MS methods. Tacrolimus AUC<sub>0–24</sub> was 28% higher with GFJ (GMR = 1.28, 90% CI 1.12–1.44) and C<sub>max</sub> was 73% higher (GMR = 1.73, 90% CI 1.46–2.00) compared to control. GFJ exhibited a clinically meaningful interaction with LCPT. However, the magnitude appears less than those reported with immediate-release formulations, suggesting the extended absorption profile of LCPT may affect susceptibility to drug interactions in the intestine.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.70016","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997444","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
<p>As we draw the curtain on 2025 and turn our gaze toward 2026, it is my pleasure to offer this year-in-review and forward-looking editorial on the evolving discipline of clinical pharmacology. The year 2025 has been pivotal for clinical pharmacology: a year when computational innovation, mechanistic modeling, and precision medicine coalesced to fundamentally re-shape drug development. Several themes dominated the landscape, both in our journal's publications and across the broader field. As we enter 2026, it is an opportune moment to reflect on the remarkable transformation clinical pharmacology has undergone in 2025, and to begin a conversation about the year ahead.</p><p>Beginning with this issue, <i>Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development</i> transitions to a continuous publication model. Rather than batching articles into discrete monthly issues, accepted manuscripts will now be published online immediately upon final preparation. This approach offers multiple advantages for our authors and readers: accelerated dissemination of findings and enhanced discoverability through earlier indexing.</p><p>Continuous publication aligns with broader trends in scholarly communication toward real-time knowledge sharing.<span><sup>1</sup></span> As digital platforms increasingly dominate academic publishing, the traditional issue-based model becomes less relevant to how researchers actually access and utilize the literature.<span><sup>2</sup></span> We believe this transition will enhance the impact and accessibility of research published in our journal while maintaining the rigorous peer review standards that define <i>Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development</i>.</p><p>Model-informed drug development (MIDD) achieved demonstrable maturation in 2025.<span><sup>3</sup></span> The publication by Sahasrabudhe and colleagues in <i>Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics</i> provided compelling quantitative evidence that systematic MIDD application yields average savings of approximately 10 months in development cycle time and $5 million per program.<span><sup>4</sup></span> These are not theoretical projections but empirical findings from retrospective portfolio analysis that offer concrete validation of MIDD's value proposition.</p><p>Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, in particular, emerged as an indispensable tool. The FDA workshop on “Advances in PBPK Modeling and its Regulatory Utility for Oral Drug Product Development,” summarized by Cheng et al.<span><sup>5</sup></span> highlighted both the successes and persistent challenges in utilizing PBPK for generic drug development and bioequivalence assessments.</p><p>Our own journal contributed important work in this area. Studies examining pharmacokinetic variability across special populations, drug–drug interactions, and first-in-human dose escalation protocols published throughout 2025 in <i>Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development</i> exemplified the practical application of quant
{"title":"From Reflection to Acceleration: Clinical Pharmacology’s 2025 Lessons and 2026 Opportunities","authors":"Amalia M. Issa","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.70012","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cpdd.70012","url":null,"abstract":"<p>As we draw the curtain on 2025 and turn our gaze toward 2026, it is my pleasure to offer this year-in-review and forward-looking editorial on the evolving discipline of clinical pharmacology. The year 2025 has been pivotal for clinical pharmacology: a year when computational innovation, mechanistic modeling, and precision medicine coalesced to fundamentally re-shape drug development. Several themes dominated the landscape, both in our journal's publications and across the broader field. As we enter 2026, it is an opportune moment to reflect on the remarkable transformation clinical pharmacology has undergone in 2025, and to begin a conversation about the year ahead.</p><p>Beginning with this issue, <i>Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development</i> transitions to a continuous publication model. Rather than batching articles into discrete monthly issues, accepted manuscripts will now be published online immediately upon final preparation. This approach offers multiple advantages for our authors and readers: accelerated dissemination of findings and enhanced discoverability through earlier indexing.</p><p>Continuous publication aligns with broader trends in scholarly communication toward real-time knowledge sharing.<span><sup>1</sup></span> As digital platforms increasingly dominate academic publishing, the traditional issue-based model becomes less relevant to how researchers actually access and utilize the literature.<span><sup>2</sup></span> We believe this transition will enhance the impact and accessibility of research published in our journal while maintaining the rigorous peer review standards that define <i>Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development</i>.</p><p>Model-informed drug development (MIDD) achieved demonstrable maturation in 2025.<span><sup>3</sup></span> The publication by Sahasrabudhe and colleagues in <i>Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics</i> provided compelling quantitative evidence that systematic MIDD application yields average savings of approximately 10 months in development cycle time and $5 million per program.<span><sup>4</sup></span> These are not theoretical projections but empirical findings from retrospective portfolio analysis that offer concrete validation of MIDD's value proposition.</p><p>Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling, in particular, emerged as an indispensable tool. The FDA workshop on “Advances in PBPK Modeling and its Regulatory Utility for Oral Drug Product Development,” summarized by Cheng et al.<span><sup>5</sup></span> highlighted both the successes and persistent challenges in utilizing PBPK for generic drug development and bioequivalence assessments.</p><p>Our own journal contributed important work in this area. Studies examining pharmacokinetic variability across special populations, drug–drug interactions, and first-in-human dose escalation protocols published throughout 2025 in <i>Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development</i> exemplified the practical application of quant","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2026-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://accp1.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.70012","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145997382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}